Sen. Rand Paul: 15 Federal Agencies Knew in 2018 that Wuhan Lab Was Trying to Create COVID 19 – NOT ONE PERSON Came Forward and Spoke the Truth to the American Public

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), a US Senator and Doctor of Ophthalmology, released a stunning report on Tuesday where he discovered that 15 different federal agencies knew that the Wuhan laboratory in China was trying to create a COVID-19 virus and they knew this since 2018.

Not one single official or employee in these 15 agencies revealed the truth to the American public during the pandemic. They should all be fired.

In 2019 the virus escaped from the Wuhan laboratory at the same time US President Donald Trump had crippled the Chinese economy with his economic policies. The rest is history.

Dr. Tony Fauci, who funded the Wuhan laboratory for some reason, repeatedly lied to the American public about the origins of the virus.

As The Gateway Pundit reported back in May 2023, Fauci gave a $1.88 million grant and $16.5 million in NIH funding to a British scientist in January 2020 if he kept his mouth shut about the origins of the COVID-19 virus.

On January 31, 2020, Danish-born and British-educated scientist Kristian Andersen, emailed Dr. Tony Fauci saying the virus looks lab-made.

Kristian Anderson, “Some of the features look engineered” and the “genome looks inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”

Then on February 4, 2020, after a call with Dr. Tony Fauci, British scientist Kristian Anderson wrote that the lab leak theory was a conspiracy theory.

Kristian Anderson, “The main crackpot theories going around at the moment related to this virus being somehow engineered… and that is demonstrably false.”

So what happened between January 31, 2020 and February 4, 2020?

Dr. Tony Fauci called Dr. Kristian Anderson and ordered him to publicly say the COVID virus was NOT lab-made.

The New York Times reported on Anderson’s early email to Dr. Fauci in an article published in June 2021.

Over the past year, Dr. Andersen has been one of the most outspoken proponents of the theory that the coronavirus originated from a natural spillover from an animal to humans outside of a lab. But in the email to Dr. Fauci in January 2020, Dr. Andersen hadn’t yet come to that conclusion. He told Dr. Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease expert, that some features of the virus made him wonder whether it had been engineered, and noted that he and his colleagues were planning to investigate further by analyzing the virus’s genome.

The researchers published those results in a paper in the scientific journal Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, concluding that a laboratory origin was very unlikely. Dr. Andersen has reiterated this point of view in interviews and on Twitter over the past year, putting him at the center of the continuing controversy over whether the virus could have leaked from a Chinese lab.

When his early email to Dr. Fauci was released, the media storm around Dr. Andersen intensified, and he deactivated his Twitter account. He answered written questions from The New York Times about the email and the fracas. The exchange has been lightly edited for length.

Dr. Anderson switched his story in 4 days after his call with Tony Fauci.

But, The New York Times conveniently omitted that after his call with Dr. Fauci on February 1, 2020, Dr. Anderson was given a $1.88 million grant and $16.5 million in funding from NIAID, Dr. Fauci’s personal piggy bank.

Dr. Andrew Huff testified to this fact back in 2022. He released this information in a legal report he signed created by the Renz Law Group.

Dr. Andrew Huff reported that Dr. Anderson’s funding at the Scripps Research Institute increased from $393,079 per month, to $800,139 per month after he backed down on the COVID lab-leak theory.
(page 56)

Scientists later discovered the first victims of the COVID 19 pandemic were researchers from the Fauci-funded Wuhan lab.

And it was also discovered that a Fauci-run Montana laboratory conducted experiments with the Wuhan Coronavirus strain over a year before the global outbreak.

Now we learn from Senator Rand Paul that 15 different federal agencies knew in 2018 that the Wuhan laboratory was trying to create a coronavirus strain like COVID-19. Not one person had the guts to step forward and tell the truth to the American public.

And we all know it is likely that they will never be indicted or punished.

Via FOX News.

How vast was the Great COVID Cover-up? Well, my investigation has recently discovered government officials from 15 federal agencies knew in 2018 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was trying to create a coronavirus like COVID-19.

These officials knew that the Chinese lab was proposing to create a COVID 19-like virus and not one of these officials revealed this scheme to the public. In fact, 15 agencies with knowledge of this project have continuously refused to release any information concerning this alarming and dangerous research.

Government officials representing at least 15 federal agencies were briefed on a project proposed by Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

This project, the DEFUSE project, proposed to insert a furin cleavage site into a coronavirus to create a novel chimeric virus that would have been shockingly similar to the COVID-19 virus.

For years, I have been fighting to obtain records from dozens of federal agencies relating to the origins of COVID-19 and the DEFUSE project. Under duress, the administration finally released documents that show that the DEFUSE project was pitched to at least 15 agencies in January 2018.

What does this mean?

It means that at least 15 federal agencies knew from the beginning of the pandemic that EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology were seeking federal funding in 2018 to create a virus genetically very similar if not identical to COVID-19.

The post Sen. Rand Paul: 15 Federal Agencies Knew in 2018 that Wuhan Lab Was Trying to Create COVID 19 – NOT ONE PERSON Came Forward and Spoke the Truth to the American Public appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Musk Says X Will ‘Dump’ All the Draconian Censure Requests by Unhinged Brazilian Supreme Court, Once Employees Are Safe From Arbitrary Arrests

The struggle between free-speech champion Elon Musk and the censure lovers of the regrettable current Brazilian government is still raging, with developments from each side.

Musk has made it clear that the judicial orders by tyrannical Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ‘are the most draconian demands of any country on Earth’.

Support for his courageous stand is coming from a myriad of freedom-loving Brazilians, with many thousands of memes celebrating the fact that someone has said ENOUGH to the Lula administration’s out-of-control actions.

Many foreigners are also joining the good fight, from the American General Flynn to the Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin.

Of course, many globalists, socialists, and tyrannical-minded people are out to get him.

Now, X will show the world what is really happening behind the curtains, and the abuse from the Brazilian court:

Coming shortly, will publish everything demanded by @Alexandre and how those requests violate Brazilian law.

This judge has brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached.

Shame @Alexandre, shame.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 7, 2024

Bu to do so, Musk needs “to get our employees in Brazil to a safe place or otherwise not in a position of responsibility” because they “have been told they will be arrested.”

We need to get our employees in Brazil to a safe place or otherwise not in a position of responsibility, then we will do a full data dump

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 9, 2024

Forbes reported:

“The comments add to an escalating row over disinformation between Brazilian authorities, X and Musk after the billionaire ordered the company to reinstate accounts blocked by the government.

Musk also slammed Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes as the ‘Dictator of Brazil’, days after de Moraes accused the billionaire of waging a ‘disinformation campaign’ against the court and its actions.”

The whole world will know how Brazilian justices are overstepping his authority to censor free speech.

Moraes’ order levied ‘massive fines’ and besides threatening to arrest X employees, he also says he may cut off access to X in Brazil.

Musk is now included in the investigations about ‘disinformation’, and he laughed this ridiculous threats the way only a powerful billionaire can.

Now, the Brazilian government is threatening to cancel all contracts with Musk’s Starlink, which is a childish reaction, since the satellite service is taking broadband internet to schools in remote areas of the Amazon.

But Musk has struck a major PR goal against the socialist tyrants by saying that, if the Lula government doesn’t ‘honor’ the contract, he will nevertheless provide the service for those schools – for free! At this point he behaves like a real hero.

Read more:

The Crackdown: Brazilian Communist Supreme Court Issues Arrest Warrants for Opposition Leaders Including a Comedian and a Journalist

The post Musk Says X Will ‘Dump’ All the Draconian Censure Requests by Unhinged Brazilian Supreme Court, Once Employees Are Safe From Arbitrary Arrests appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Finishing Hamas: The Only Way the War Can End

 

 

Smoke and flames billow after Israeli forces struck a high-rise tower in Gaza City, October 7, 2023. Palestinian militants have begun a “war” against Israel which they infiltrated by air, sea and land from the blockaded Gaza Strip, Israeli officials said, a major escalation in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Photo by Ali Hamad apaimages

 

A proportional response means it will happen again and again until Israel is destroyed.

The liberals want Israel to “show restraint.” The most unthinking are those calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. As long as Hamas continues to exist, this war can never end. A ceasefire would be followed by countless billions in developmental aid flowing from the globalist establishment into Gaza. It would be a huge win for Hamas. Terrorist attacks against Israel would continue. And if Israel reacted again in the future, they would immediately be attacked by the globalists. Both Hezbollah and Hamas will continue to attack Israel, provoking, wounding, occasionally killing, and the world will continue telling Israel to restrain itself.

Terrorist attacks against Israel would continue. And if Israel reacted again in the future, they would immediately be attacked by the globalists. Both Hezbollah and Hamas will continue to attack Israel, provoking, wounding, occasionally killing, and the world will continue telling Israel to restrain itself.

The Covenant of Hamas clearly states Hamas’s goal of killing all of the Jews and eliminating Israel. “HAMAS” is an Arabic acronym for the Islamic Resistance Movement. The movement issued the Covenant of HAMAS on August 18, 1988. Hamas, an extremist fundamentalist Islamic organization, has been designated a terrorist organization by the US and many Western powers. The group was elected as the official authority in Gaza in 2006.

Hamas operates with the expressed intent of destroying the State of Israel through Jihad (Islamic Holy War). The HAMAS Covenant states: ‘The Islamic Resistance Movement is a distinguished Palestinian movement, whose allegiance is to Allah, and whose way of life is Islam. It strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine.’ (Article 6). This suggests that not only does Hamas seek to eradicate Israel in Gaza, but also in the territory currently known as Israel, as well as the West Bank, where Hamas holds no authority.

Article 7 of the Hamas Covenant is interpreted as a call for genocide against Jews: “The Day of Judgment will not come about until Muslims fight Jews and kill them. Then, the Jews will hide behind rocks and trees, and the rocks and trees will cry out: ‘O Muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him.’”

There is no way to negotiate with a group whose aim is genocide. Liberals calling for compromise are actually just calling for Israel’s capitulation. What compromise would be possible? Hamas wants to kill 100% of the Jews. Should the two parties haggle and agree for Hamas to kill 40% instead? Given Hamas’s genocidal intent, there is no way that the two sides can coexist.

The two-state solution is complete nonsense. Gaza and the West Bank are not contiguous; they cannot be a single country. It would be impossible for Israel to ensure its security because they would be pressured by globalists to not impede Palestinians passing through Israel from one state to the other.

 

The liberals keep stressing that Gazaa and the Palestinians are not Hamas. However, there appears to be no anti-Hamas movement in Gaza. There is no anti-Hamas resistance. The Gazans looked very happy when they were celebrating after the October 7th attack on Israel. So, it is unclear how the liberals see Hamas as distinct from Gaza. And if they are distinct, why have the liberals not condemned Hamas? There don’t seem to be protests in the US or Europe stating “We support Gaza, but condemn Hamas.”

Even the liberals, even the Queers for Palestine are refusing to condemn Hamas. If they do not differentiate between Hamas and Gaza, then why should everyone else?

Iran and Qatar must also be held accountable for their support of Hamas and other militias. Qatar has provided financial and political support to Hamas, and Hamas’s political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, was based in Qatar for a period. Additionally, Qatar has hosted a Hamas office, which serves as a political bureau and facilitates communication and coordination with the international community. This office has been involved in diplomatic efforts and media relations on behalf of Hamas.

Right now, the Houthis, an Iran-backed militia, are disrupting global shipping. Hezbollah is also ratcheting up their harassment of Israel, firing missiles into Israeli territory and trying to instigate a war. Given Israel’s current posture of seeking a military solution to finally end these insurgencies, Hezbollah may get the war they are asking for.

The world must not just sit on the sidelines, but should take an active role in targeting Iran, destroying the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) preventing China from supporting Iran economically, and disabling Iran’s ability to fund and train regional militias. This would decrease China and Russia’s access to oil and drones, respectively, which would help the US achieve foreign policy objectives in Asia, as well as in Ukraine.

One way to alleviate the burden on American taxpayers funding Ukraine would be to end the war. If China’s support for Russia were cut, the end would come much sooner. If Russia did not have Iranian drones, that would also help level the field and bring the end nearer.

Attacks on Iran would also serve to destroy Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

The only way that Israel can survive is to eliminate Hamas. The only way for the region to be stabilized is for Iran’s destabilizing force to be eliminated.

The post Finishing Hamas: The Only Way the War Can End appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Radical Democrat Congresswoman Suggests Exempting Black People from Paying Taxes (VIDEO)

Rep. Jasmine Crockett, left, expresses openness to allowing blacks to be exempt from paying taxes. Credit: @EndWokeness

A far-left Democrat Congresswoman has suggested she is supportive of one the most shocking forms of racial discrimination: exempting black people in America from having to pay taxes as a form of reparations while other racial groups have to fork over money to Uncle Sam.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) made the suggestion to host Jehan “J” Carter on ‘The Black Lawyers Podcast’ last week, as the Daily Mail reported.

When Carter asked Crockett about reparations for black people, she told the host, “I don’t know, that’s not necessarily a bad idea” and that it may not be as objectionable to simply handing out money to people.

She goes on to argue that reparations in some form are necessary. “We end up being so far behind,” she whines.

Crockett then admits that the no-tax scheme may face challenges because poorer blacks are not paying taxes to begin with. She agrees with Carter that poorer blacks may just want checks from the government, like what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

WATCH:

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) suggests exempting blacks from taxes.

She then says maybe it’s not the best idea because many blacks don’t pay any taxes anyway… so maybe give free checks. pic.twitter.com/hPCNleGl1p

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 9, 2024

TRANSCRIPT:

CROCKETT: Just this past week I saw, I don’t remember which celebrity, but it was actually a celebrity, and I was like, I don’t know that that’s not necessarily a bad idea, but I’d have to think it through a lot,” she began in a clip circulating social media. One of the things that they propose is black folk not have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time.

But at the same time, it may not be as objectionable to some people about actually giving out dollars. But obviously, then you start dealing with the different tax brackets and things like that, and that’s one of the reasons that you know, we argue that reparations make sense because so many black folks — not only do you owe for the labor that was stolen, killed and all the other things, right? — but the fact is, we end up being so far behind.

If you do the no-tax thing for people that are already, say, struggling and not paying taxes in the first place…

CARTER (laughing): They may want those checks like they got from COVID…

CROCKETT: Exactly!

Here is Crockett’s full interview:

The post Radical Democrat Congresswoman Suggests Exempting Black People from Paying Taxes (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

MUST SEE: FOX News Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Nails Karine Jean Pierre on Biden Administration’s Complete Lack of Morals – Ignoring Dearborn Islamists While Calling Republicans Murderers (VIDEO)

FOX News reporter Jacqui Heinrich exposes Karine Jean-Pierre and Biden administration at White House presser.

FOX News reporter Jacqui Heinrich exposed the Biden Administration’s complete absence of moral clarity at the latest White House press briefing.

Jacqui Heinrich asked White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre to explain why they were not condemning the anti-American chants by Dearborn Islamists but instead were calling Republicans “murderers” for opposing the failures and climbing costs of Obamacare.

Curtis Houck, the Managing Editor of Newsbusters, posted the transcript of this questioning in a thread on Twitter-X.

Here is the transcript of the exchange:

Jacqui Heinrich: “A couple days ago in Deaborn, there were protesters chanting, ‘Death to America!’ and, ‘Death to Israel!’ Does the President condemn that?”

Karine Jean Pierre (KJP): “Yes.”

Heinrich: “Is the President at all concerned that Dearborn is becoming – is facing a risk of becoming a hotbed of any sort of homegrown threats?”

KJP: “I don’t have any intelligence to share with you on that. Obviously, that’s something that we’re always very vigilant about, but don’t have any national intelligence to share with you.”

Heinrich: “And then…”

KJP: “But, obviously, we will condemn any – any of violent rhetoric…”

Heinrich: “…Would we be seeing a statement?”

KJP: “…Which …which we have been very, I mean, you’re hearing from me, right? You’re asking me a question. I’m answering it and we’ve been very vigilant about… or very consistent about denouncing that type of that type of rhetoric.”

JACQUI TIME: : “A couple days ago in Deaborn, there were protesters chanting, ‘death to America’ and ‘death to Israel.’ Does the President condemn that?”

KJP: “Yes.”

.@JacquiHeinrich: “Is the President at all concerned that Dearborn is becoming – is facing a risk of becoming a… pic.twitter.com/WX2XYeWtzB

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 9, 2024

Heinrich: “Should we see a – should we expect a statement from the President on that? It was a pretty significant display.”

KJP: “I mean, you’re hearing from me. I think that’s important. The other part, too, that I do want to be very clear about – you know, peaceful protest is something that the President has also been very, very clear that is important for – to give folks space to peacefully protest, but any type of violent rhetoric, we are going to denounce.”

.@JacquiHeinrich: “Should we see a – should we expect a statement from the President on that? It was a pretty significant display.”

KJP: “I mean, you’re hearing from me. I think that’s important. The other part, too, that I do want to be very clear about – you know, peaceful… pic.twitter.com/cVk7prsRjb

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 9, 2024

After setting up KDP, Jacqui Heinrich then goes for the kill shot.

Heinrich: “And then, on some of the comments he made today, did – did the President mean to, essentially accuse Republicans of – of murder? I mean, the – the language that he was using to describe opposition to the Affordable Care Act – the quote was, um, ‘They want to terminate the Affordable Care Act. Terminate will – guess what – kill millions of Americans.’ Does he think that Republicans are trying to kill Americans?”

KJP: “I think you’re – I think you’re taking the most extreme – extreme definition or extreme evaluation of what the President said. Here’s the reality. The Affordable Care Act, which obviously started in the Obama-Biden administration, the President expanded on that, making sure that people have affordable health care that saves lives. It does. It is important.”

Heinrich: “[Inaudible] use other language, though? It – it’s a stronger than usual…”

KJP: “But you’re taking what he said to the most extreme part of – of your definition or your realization.”

Heinrich: “Well, he said it.”

KJP: “I know, but let’s be – let’s be really clear.”

Heinrich: “…He – he said –”

KJP: “Let’s…”

Heinrich: “…harm and…”

KJP: “…Let’s be really clear. People having health care is important. It saves lives. It is important to have that.”

.@JacquiHeinrich: “And then, on some of the comments he made today, did – did the President mean to – essentially accuse Republicans of – of murder? I mean, the – the language that he was using to describe opposition to the Affordable Care Act – the quote was, um, ‘they want to… pic.twitter.com/fLFPJUCPSG

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 9, 2024

The post MUST SEE: FOX News Reporter Jacqui Heinrich Nails Karine Jean Pierre on Biden Administration’s Complete Lack of Morals – Ignoring Dearborn Islamists While Calling Republicans Murderers (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Caitlin Clark and Iowa Women’s Team Draw 4 Million More Viewers than Men’s NCAA Championship Game – But Ignorant WNBA ‘Stars’ Still Throw Shade at Clark – Jason Whitlock Weighs In

The NCAA Men’s Basketball Final drew 14.82 million viewers on Monday night. The game between Purdue and UConn men surpassed the previous year’s final by 4%.

The men’s number was 4 million viewers short from the women’s final with Caitlin Clark and the Iowa Hawkeyes.

The Iowa women drew in 18.87 million viewers in their NCAA final game against the South Carolina women’s basketball juggernaut.

Caitlin Clark and her Iowa teammates were involved in the four most-viewed games in women’s college basketball history.

Nicole Auerback reported:

A massive WBB viewership record was set a year ago, with Iowa-LSU drawing 9.9M viewers. Then it was broken by the Iowa-LSU rematch in the Elite Eight, broken again by Iowa-UConn in the Final Four, and broken again by Iowa-South Carolina in the title game.

The Caitlin Clark effect:
** 2023 NCAA Championship with Iowa vs. LSU — 9.9 million viewers.
** April 1 2024 NCAA quarterfinal game with Iowa vs. reigning champions LSU — 12.3 million viewers

Another record for Caitlin Clark – The LSU-Iowa game was the most-watched women’s basketball game EVER!

** April 5, 2024 NCAA semifinal with Iowa vs. UConn Huskies – 14.2 million viewers (Almost topping the men’s final game)
** April 7, 2024 NCAA final with Iowa vs. UC – 18.87 million viewers almost doubling the previous year’s record!

A massive WBB viewership record was set a year ago, with Iowa-LSU drawing 9.9M viewers. Then it was broken by the Iowa-LSU rematch in the Elite Eight, broken again by Iowa-UConn in the Final Four, and broken again by Iowa-South Carolina in the title game. https://t.co/jJTHe03rMZ

— Nicole Auerbach (@NicoleAuerbach) April 8, 2024

Despite Caitlin Clark’s enormous success and the record interest in women’s basketball for the first time EVER — the old stars of yesteryear showed nothing but jealousy and disgust for Caitlin this year.

Iowa’s Caitlin Clark broke every record imaginable this year in women’s AND men’s basketball.

• D-I scoring leader (3,951 pts)
• only D-I player w/ 3,500 pts, 1,000 ast & 850 reb in a career
• most pts in single season in D-I WBB (1,234)
• most 3pt in single season in D-I hist (201)
• most pts (491), ast (152), 3pt (78) in NCAAT in career
• only player w/ 40 pts, 10 ast in NCAAT gm (she has 2)
• only player w/ 30+ pt trip-dbl in NCAAT
• only D-I player to led CBB in pts & ast in single season 2x
• B1G all-time ast leader (1,144)
• only player w/ > 3 career 25+ pt trip-dbl (she has 10)

Caitlin Clark also brought excitement to the game of women’s basketball – something unimaginable before she entered college.

Look at how Caitlin compared to the rest of the women’s league in her performance.

Dorktown: Caitlin Clark! pic.twitter.com/fN5S1f4D1x

— Secret Base (@secretbase) April 8, 2024

Former women’s record holder Lynette Woodard trashed Clark’s all-time scoring record.

Male jocks have seen their records broken thanks to a series of rule changes over decades without displaying the level of jealousy we’ve seen Caitlin Clark ignite.

Men destroy themselves. Women destroy the world. pic.twitter.com/ZwZSvR3I14

— Jason Whitlock (@WhitlockJason) April 7, 2024

Woodard forgot to mention that she played against much smaller schools when she was in college. But whatever.

Caitlin may have a 3 point line but she didn’t play Wayne State, Delta State, Central Missouri, Northwest Missouri State, Grand View, Northwest Oklahoma State and Wayland Baptist for regular season games like you did. she would’ve broken your record a lot quicker if she did https://t.co/0g0SDB8p7w

— Hawkeye Historian (@Hawk_Historian) April 7, 2024

Clark and her Iowa teammates sold out every home game and sold out or set attendance records at nearly every major venue they played at all season.

Clark and Iowa broke audience records on ESPN on Monday and then broke that record on Friday in the semi-final.

Via ClutchPoints.

Caitlin Clark single-handedly remade women’s basketball from unwatchable to must-see television.

WNBA elites trashed Clark. Former players diminished her accomplishments for some reason. Even many announcers minimized Clark’s popularity.

Dave Portnoy posted this on Sunday on all the hatred hurled at Caitlin Clark.

Jealousy is a stinky cologne. Nobody wants to give Caitlin Clark her flowers @stoolpresidente pic.twitter.com/yWAP5tVje1

— Barstool Sports (@barstoolsports) April 7, 2024

The women would rather destroy Caitlin Clark than admit to her greatness.

Jason Whitlock may have offered Caitlin the most logical advice telling Caitlin to stay at Iowa for another year, make millions, and then bypass the WNBA and retire.

Caitlin Clark should return to Iowa next season, make about $20 million in NIL, retire from basketball, marry her boyfriend, and avoid the nastiness that awaits her in the WNBA. I’m not joking.

— Jason Whitlock (@WhitlockJason) April 7, 2024

Don’t miss Jason Whitlock’s on point discussion on the WNBA’s horrible attacks on Caitlin Clark.

The post Caitlin Clark and Iowa Women’s Team Draw 4 Million More Viewers than Men’s NCAA Championship Game – But Ignorant WNBA ‘Stars’ Still Throw Shade at Clark – Jason Whitlock Weighs In appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

MOST POWERFUL PRO-TRUMP AD OF THE YEAR! Claremont Institute Chairman Tom Klingenstein Produces the MOST AMAZING VIDEO – “TRUMP’S VIRTUES, Part II”

Tom Klingenstein is the Chairman of the Claremont Institute. He is also a philanthropist, public speaker, writer, and playwright.

On April 4, 2024, Tom released an incredible new video, “Trump’s Virtues, Part II.”

This is the most powerful argument for Donald Trump for President we have seen in years!  It is that good.

Tom Klingenstein also wisely defines in detail the current war we are fighting against ‘woke’ revolutionaries that kick and spit on America.

And, Klingenstein argues that this is Trump’s time, adding, “Lincoln spoke of Americans as the almost chosen people. Trump gives us hope that the God who has never forsaken his almost chosen people will not do so now.”

This video was beautifully produced.

It just happened to pop up as an ad on X and it captured my eye… and then my heart.

Here is the transcript – “TRUMP’S VIRTUES, Part II.”

USA!… USA!… USA!… USA!…

Tom Klingenstein: Now that President Trump is the Republican nominee for President in 2024, it’s time for Republicans, including those who doubt him or even can’t stand him to get behind him. The times demand it. We are in a war fighting an enemy of revolutionaries that kick and spit on America. I call our enemy the Woke regime or the Group quota regime. This war is a contest between those who love America and those who hate it. But we do not have a commander-in-chief. You can’t win a war without one. We shouldn’t much care whether our commander-in-chief is a real conservative, whether he is a role model for children, or says lots of silly things, or whether he is modest or dignified.

What we should care about is whether he knows we are in a war, knows who the enemy is, and knows how to win.

Trump does. His policies are important but not as important as the rest of him. Trump grasps the essential things. He understands the Group Joueur de Regime is evil and will not stop until it destroys America. He is a fighter, bold, brave, and decisive, who has confidence in himself and his country.

Trump never apologizes for America. He rightly believes America is the greatest country in history. Trump says, in effect, we have our culture. It’s exceptional, and that’s the way we want to keep it. And we won’t keep it if we usher in millions of immigrants with cultures different from our own. Trump knows his job is to protect Americans and just Americans. Protect them not just from enemies abroad, but from the woke globalists within. He knows that America does not need more diversity. It needs more cohesion. The woke radicals tell the Trump voters they are a threat to democracy. Think about that. They’re saying, You Trumpsters are a threat to democracy. The woke radicals also tell us ad nauseam that America is systemically racist. Trump knows this is deadly nonsense, and he says so. This charge of systemic racism bounces off Trump because he has no white guilt, or any guilt for that matter. Trump tells his supporters what they already know. They are not racist, and they do not have white privilege. The woke radicals shut up those who disagree. Trump will not be shut up. If they manage to put him in jail, he will still roar like a lion.

The woke radicals have the moral arrogance of fanatics. Trump, God bless him, knows we are all sinners. Trump rejects the utopian fanaticism of the woke radicals. He is a businessman who takes the world on its own terms and navigates by facts and common sense. Trump’s base knows firsthand the America that Trump wants to recover. They love him, and they know he loves them. They will fight for him because they know he will fight for them. Trump speaks to his supporters as fellow citizens without any condescension or poll-tested BS. Despite his billions, he is one of them, an outsider looking in, a man who takes catsup on his steak. And is as disgusted as they are with the anti-American elite.

This natural appeal has molded everyday patriotic Americans into an army. We cannot stop the left’s revolution and retake the nation without these men and women. Unlike most Conservatives, they will actually fight for America. But they follow Trump. Without him, they stay home. With him, they are united and determined. At his rallies, his audience invariably breaks into chance of USA, USA. In these moments, Trump and his audience mutually pledge to each other their fidelity and their sacred honor.

His enemies hate him with an indescribable fierceness. Another Hitler, they say. Elect him and he will be a dictator. We should take this hysteria as reason for hope.

The America-haters rightly fear that Trump and his party are on the threshold of a successful counter-revolution. Trump hates his enemies every bit as much as they hate him. His enemies are America’s enemies. Trump is the most towering figure of our time. He has changed politics, not just in America, but in the West. If we are to take back America, we need someone who is unmovable, who has proven that he can stand up against the immensely powerful army of woke modernity that will attack him with all its might. Someone who will go after the deep state without pity or compassion. And someone who has the conviction that America is still the last best hope of Earth. That someone is Trump. Trump, the politician, came out of the blue. An unconventional commander against an unconventional enemy. Almost inconceivable as President at any other time.

Trump fits this turbulent moment to a T. Is it too much to wonder whether the appearance of this most unconventional man is providential?

Lincoln spoke of Americans as the almost chosen people. Trump gives us hope that the God who has never forsaken his almost chosen people will not do so now.

Thank you,

USA!… USA!… USA!… USA!…

The post MOST POWERFUL PRO-TRUMP AD OF THE YEAR! Claremont Institute Chairman Tom Klingenstein Produces the MOST AMAZING VIDEO – “TRUMP’S VIRTUES, Part II” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Hans Von Spakovsky: Chuck Schumer Is Violating Senate Rules by Not Holding an Impeachment Trial of DHS Secretary Mayorkas – He Knows It Will Expose the Crimes (VIDEO)

Hans Von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, joined Grant Stinchfield on Stinchfield Tonight on RAV Tuesday night to discuss Joe Biden’s open borders and the impeachment of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

So far Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has refused to hold the Senate trial for DHS Secretary Mayorkas.

During their conversation, Hans Von Spakovsky detailed the numerous violations of the law by the Biden regime and DHS Secretary Mayorkas regarding the millions of illegal aliens they have allowed in the country.

Hans Von Spakovsky: Last year, me and several other senior analysts at Heritage, we wrote an almost 50-page paper listing all of the violations of federal immigration law that Mayorkas has committed. It’s not just violating the law himself, but it’s directing staff, the Border Patrol, to violate federal law. The idea this is just a policy dispute is just wrong. This is a deliberate policy. Just one item, mass paroling illegal aliens coming across the border, the ones they catch, they immediately release, they parole them, that violates federal immigration law.

Grant Stinchfield: They’re giving them, I know, some of them, two-year work permits. I don’t think they have the authority to issue those two-year work permits?

Hans Von Spakovsky: No, they do not. That’s another straight-out violation federal immigration law. Federal immigration statutes very carefully lay out who can be issued work permits. Illegal aliens who have come into this country cannot be issued work permit. It just can’t be done. So again, a straight out violation of federal law by Mayorkas.

Hans Von Spakovsky also reminded Grant that holding the US Senate impeachment trial is not an option it is the law.

Grant Stinchfield: I think one of the things this puts the spotlight on is the importance for Republicans to control the Senate and, of course, the House. Because even I was not aware. I’ve been doing this for a while, and I was not aware that they can just dismiss this with 51 votes, that it doesn’t even have to go to trial, where, of course, you’d need much more than that to convict this guy. But 51 votes, I don’t think this sees the light of day as far as a trial goes. I think this will get dismissed by Schumer very quickly.

Hans Von Spakovsky:  Yeah, but in order to do that, he will have to violate the Senate’s rules. The Senate has a special rule that it put in place, a parliamentary rule, to handle impeachments. The rule was implemented back in the 1980s. That rule calls for a trial. There is no language in there whatsoever that simply allows a motion to dismiss and a vote on a motion to dismiss. Plus, look, the Constitution says the House votes on whether to impeach a federal official, and the Senate then is responsible for holding a trial and determining whether they are guilty or should be acquitted. There’s nothing in there about not holding a trial and simply throwing it out.

On Chuck Schumer disregarding senate rules to dismiss the Mayorkas impeachment

Hans Von Spakovsky:  Oh, I think he’ll violate his own parliamentary rules to bring up a motion to dismiss, and they’ll throw it out. Because, as I think you said earlier, if they actually hold a trial and they start bringing in all of the evidence of not only all the violations of federal law that have occurred, but the results of those violations, the things that have happened all over the country, like the murder of Laken Reilly, because this alien, he was stopped at the border, processed and released. So that is directly the fault of Mayorkas’ policies.

The laws and rules only apply to conservatives and Trump supporters.  The Democrats really don’t care if they break the rules.  Just like they don’t care if they destroy the country with their open borders.

God help us.

Via Stinchfield Tonight:

Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) blasted Senator Schumer on Tuesday for refusing his duty to hold an impeachment trial for DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

This chart alone could decide the election.

That’s why Senator Schumer does not want to hold a trial. pic.twitter.com/iA0TVJROIH

— Ron Johnson (@RonJohnsonWI) April 10, 2024

The post Hans Von Spakovsky: Chuck Schumer Is Violating Senate Rules by Not Holding an Impeachment Trial of DHS Secretary Mayorkas – He Knows It Will Expose the Crimes (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

“B*tch, Do You Think I’m Taking Horse Medicine?” – Joe Rogan GOES OFF over CNN’s Ivermectin Smear Campaign (VIDEO)

Via The Vigilant Fox.

Joe Rogan went off on CNN again this week over their famous Ivermectin smear campaign.

Joe Rogan: “I never thought that I would get sucked into something like that where people would be lying about me. But when you watch it on CNN, just flat-out lying. That’s a function of power, dude. But it’s wild. The dumbest lie.

B*tch, do you think I’m taking horse medicine? You don’t think I know really good doctors that are telling me what to take? How about the fact that I got better quick? That doesn’t freak you out at all? I got better real quick. You were so happy, I bet, when that shit kicked. What was it, 48 hours then you were done. Yeah. Three days later, after I was sick, I made that video, and I was fine. Three days after that, I did 10 rounds on the bag. Six days in, I did 10 rounds on the bag. I’m like, Let’s see how I feel. I worked out five days in. I felt pretty good. I said, All right, tomorrow, let’s get after it. I did 10 fucking rounds on the back. Full clip. No problems. No problems. No lack of energy. I felt 100% six days later. Yeah. 100%.

But I’m on top of my f*cking health all day long, all year round. I’m always in shape. I always take vitamins. I’m always eating well. I sleep good. I do a lot of things. You can’t say that everyone has to adhere to the rules of this thing when you’re lying about the results, you’re lying about the studies, you’re influencing all these talking heads to say these things that turn out to not even be remotely true. Not only that, there’s no studies behind it. They had to admit when they were speaking in front of whatever it was in the UK, that they tested these drugs for transmission. They just tested them to see if they created the antibodies. Then all that other stuff they said was bullshit.”

This is not the first time Joe Rogan went after CNN for smearing him and lying about Ivermectin.

Rogan threatened to sue CNN back in September 2021 after they, “kept making sh*t up,” and kept repeating that he was taking a horse dewormer for COVID 19.

The FDA finally admitted in March 2024 that people who took Ivermectin for COVID 19 recovered faster.

THEY LIED TO YOU: New Study Finds People Who Took Ivermectin for COVID Recovered Faster – As TGP Reported Over Two Years Ago!

Via The Joe Rogan Experience.

This comes years after the FDA ran a public campaign against the drug and tens of thousands died as a result.

Joe Rogan ERUPTS Over CNN’s Ivermectin Smear Campaign

“B*tch, do you think I’m taking horse medicine? … How about the fact that I got better quick? That doesn’t freak you out at all?”

Instead of asking Joe Rogan how he got better after contracting COVID-19, CNN decided to… pic.twitter.com/ugB1ueW3O8

— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) April 10, 2024

The post “B*tch, Do You Think I’m Taking Horse Medicine?” – Joe Rogan GOES OFF over CNN’s Ivermectin Smear Campaign (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Is There A CIA Link To The Crocus City Center Terrorist Attack?

Real life is better than the movies. No doubt. Today’s surprise comes out of Moscow, with an announcement from the State organization charged with investigating major crimes that the Ukrainian company Burisma was involved with financing terrorists:

Russia’s top investigative body announced Tuesday that it has launched a criminal probe into senior officials in the United States and NATO member countries who are suspected of “financing terrorism.”

Russia’s Investigative Committee, which probes major crimes, said it has “established” that money from commercial organizations had been used to “eliminate prominent political and public figures” inside and outside Russia in recent years, as well as to “inflict economic damage” against the country. . . .

The top law enforcement body named the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings as one of the implicated organizations. U.S. President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden served as a member of Burisma’s board of directors between 2014 and 2019.

So, what’s the big deal. We already knew about Hunter. What does that have to do with the CIA? Does the name Cofer Black ring a bell?

International Energy Group Burisma has expanded its Board of Directors to include an expert in the field of security and strategic development. Joseph Cofer Black, a former Director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center and Ambassador at Large for counter-terrorism recently joined the Board as an independent director at Burisma Group. Ambassador Black resigned from public service in 2005 after a 30 year career  and is considered a  leading expert and significant figure on  U.S. and international security issues.  

How about that. A career CIA officer, with no experience in the oil and gas industry beyond pumping gas for his own vehicles, gets a sweet spot on a board alongside Hunter Biden. Before joining the board of Burisma, Mr. Black snagged a spot on the board of a Latvian Bank:

The extraordinary meeting of the shareholders of joint-stock company Baltic International Bank (‘the Bank’) was held on 11 October 2016 where decisions on changes in the composition of the Bank’s Supervisory Board were adopted.

Joseph Cofer Black has been invited to join the existing members of the Bank’s Supervisory Board– Valērijs Belokoņs, Vlada Belokoņa, Andris Ozoliņš and Dr. Hans – Friedrich Von Ploetz – as of November 1, 2016.

Cofer Black’s ostensible qualification for serving on the Bank’s board was his background in counter terrorism. In an interview with DELFI, a business magazine, Cofer claimed expertise in terrorist financing:

What does counterterrorism have in common with banking? How much time do you have? Actually [they are] shockingly similar. I spent the last 12 years of my time [at the CIA] in counterterrorism, but before that I worked in other fields [of intelligence]. An important thing in counterterrorism is what we now call financial counterterrorism. At the beginning of my career, there was little if any combating of terrorism in the financial area. It was my responsibility, but I wasn’t very eager to get into it, because it’s timeconsuming, labor-intensive and expensive. In that time you are trying to outsmart and stop terrorists before they kill people.

Turns out, Cofer was of no help to the Latvian bank on this issue. In 2018 the bank was fined:

Latvia’s financial regulator, the Financial and Capital Market Commission (FKTK) said December 6 it was imposing a 1.5 million euro fine on Baltic International Bank (BIB) “for deficiencies in the Bank’s internal control system.”. . .

“In 2018 the FKTK carried out an on-site inspection of the Bank, as well as a targeted inspection, during which the FCMC identified that the Bank’s internal control system does not fully comply to the regulatory requirements governing the prevention of money laundering and terrorism and proliferation financing (hereinafter – AML/CTPF),” the FKTK said.

“The Bank had not established an adequate internal control system to meet its risks in the field of prevention of money laundering and terrorism and proliferation financing, which would ensure effective compliance with the regulatory requirements,” it added, explaning that “in several cases” the bank had not taken sufficient measures to make certain that a beneficial owner indicated was the beneficial owner; had not obtained documentation and had not taken necessary measures to make certain of the origin of financial means in its customer accounts and had not documented conclusions; had not ensured appropriate and high-quality enhanced customer due diligence; had not duly decided on termination of business relationships with customers and, in a particularly damning comment “had not paid sufficient and special attention to untypical large, complex, inter-related transactions with no apparent economic purpose or clear legal purpose.”

Going back to the charges leveled by Russia’s Investigative Committee, if Cofer Black was on the Burisma Board during the time that Burisma funds were being transferred to groups with ties to terrorists, then it is quite understandable that Russia will be inclined to believe the CIA is implicated, at least indirectly, in terrorist attacks in Russia. Too bad that Latvian bank did not hire me and my partner instead of Cofer. We actually wrote and implemented compliance programs for banks and investment firms that kept them out of this kind of trouble. I can’t wait to see the evidence.

A couple of interesting and unusual interviews today. The first was with Marcos Soares, a Brazilian who lives and works in Italy. The second was with Sarah at DD Geopolitics. We discussed CIA links to terrorist organizations.

 

The post Is There A CIA Link To The Crocus City Center Terrorist Attack? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.