Britain’s ‘Turkish Barber’ Phenomenon

Britain’s ‘Turkish Barber’ Phenomenon

Organized crime flourishes in deep Britain under the state’s benign neglect.

13_Bridge_Street,_Mansfield
UK Special Coverage
url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:13_Bridge_Street,_Mansfield.jpg

Credit: Alan Murray-Rust / ‘Thirteen’, Bridge Street, Mansfield / CC BY-SA 2.0

Most visitors to Britain will probably head straight for Buckingham Palace, the Tower of London, or Shakespeare’s Stratford. But should you wander off the tourist trail, you’ll soon notice a curious abundance of Turkish barbershops. It might seem strange enough that these hairdressers are literally everywhere. Stranger still is that there’s rarely anyone in any of them who is actually having their hair cut.

There are at least 13 Turkish-style barbers on a one-mile length of Streatham High Road in south London. Along Kingsland Road in Dalston, east London, there are over 16. All of them offer similar services: sharp haircuts, skin fades, wet shaves with a straight-razor and hot towel, and ear- and nose-waxing—and at tantalizingly cheap prices. None of this, it seems, is of much interest to passing customers.

If this were a phenomenon confined to London, it would hardly be worth commenting on. But Turkish barbers are proliferating well beyond the capital, across the length and breadth of the UK. You’ll see them in plush market towns, fading former coal-mining villages, out-of-town shopping parades. Settlements that would struggle to sustain a few pubs and grocery stores have all got a Turkish barber. Porth, a town in south Wales with a population of fewer than 6,000, is now home to 14 barbershops, many of them Turkish-style. That’s one for every 426 residents. 

There has been a 50 percent climb in the number of barbershops in the UK since 2018, and I dare say this has nothing to do with men taking better care of themselves. (Meanwhile, women’s hair salons have actually been in decline.) Pity the fool who actually pays a fiver or a tenner in exchange for a haircut. A former intern of mine, new to the UK, will never make that mistake again. The best-case scenario is that your new hairstyle will draw widespread mockery. Unluckier clients have caught ringworm, as the untrained “stylists” tend not to sterilize their tools between jobs. TikTok is ablaze with videos of angry Gen Z-ers with messed-up hairlines, saying they’ve been ‘done dirty’ and are now ‘cooked’, courtesy of their local Turkish barber.

It doesn’t take an MI5 intelligence officer to work out what is really going on here. Many of these Turkish-style barbers are money-laundering fronts for gangs, usually involved in drugs or human trafficking. In this sense, the “Turkish” moniker is unfair. The fronts are more likely to be operated by Albanians (the undisputed kingpins of Britain’s drug trade), Iraqi Kurds, or Iranians. Some of these ‘businesses’ report takings of £100,000 to £150,000 per month—even those outside of London and on streets with multiple “competitors.”

There’s no doubt that the public feels unsettled by all this. For many parts of the UK, it is the clearest sign they have that the nation they grew up in has changed irrevocably—and one of the clearest manifestations of the rapid, seismic changes in Britain that have elevated the Reform Party to lead the national polls. The illegal boats in the English Channel they read about in the papers, or the urban crime waves they see on the nightly news, have spread out of the cities and now touch their lives directly. The tentacles of organized crime have stretched into places that, even if not well-to-do, at least had a certain innocence. And you would have to be spectacularly unobservant not to notice all this change.

For many, the Turkish barber phenomenon is an embodiment of “broken Britain.” It speaks not only to demographic change and crime, but also to a stagnating economy and to an unresponsive government. 

Thanks to Britain’s economic decay, especially outside of London, would-be tenants have access to vast numbers of empty locations and boarded-up storefronts. These can then be snapped up easily and cheaply. And while regular, honest businesses may be buckling, the black markets in illicit substances and labor are positively booming.

Indeed, once a gang has acquired a money-laundering storefront, they will put the illegal migrants to work, either in the fake barbershops, usually just to stand around and look busy, or to push drugs—often, it has to be said, just as ineffectively as they cut hair. In one infamous case, an illiterate Iraqi former goat herder was caught selling cocaine in the small Welsh seaside town of Aberystwyth (population: 14,000). The man could barely speak English and was so illiterate that he needed his own name tattooed on his arm. He was arrested within five days of arriving in the town. The gang that trafficked him to Britain used barbershops and car washes as fronts. 

But drug dealing and trafficking are arguably the least of it. The owner of Boss Crew Barbers in Hammersmith in west London was convicted in 2022 of funding ISIS terrorists. To add the icing on the cake, he had claimed government grants for his store being closed during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Although the public has long smelled a rat when it comes to Turkish barbers, the authorities have been slow to respond at scale, beyond investigating individual fronts or gangs. It’s not hard to conclude that, as with the now internationally notorious “grooming gangs” scandal, political correctness has played a role in this paralysis. No officer who wants to keep his career wants to be the one to suggest interrogating hard-working and enterprising migrants. Police chiefs insist it is far too “complex” to nail these criminal enterprises, even those that are operating in plain sight. But reality can only be ignored for so long.

The National Crime Agency (the closest thing the UK has to the FBI) finally began large-scale investigations into the barbershop phenomenon in early 2025. By the autumn, “Operation Machinize” had led to more than 900 arrests and around £10.7 million of suspected criminal proceeds seized. This was barely enough to scratch the surface of this vast criminal underbelly that now stretches across the UK, but it was at least the first clear acknowledgement that something not only should be done, but also could be done, with enough political will there. 

Yet even now that it is well established that many of these premises are fronts for organized crime, it is still uncouth in polite society to say so. Only this week, a minister in the Labour government accused Nigel Farage of dog-whistle racism for promising harsher crackdowns on Turkish barbershops. Robert Jenrick, a former Conservative shadow minister who recently defected to Farage’s Reform UK, was roundly chastised by the media last year merely for saying the proliferation of these barbershops seemed “weird.” He clearly spoke for many across the country who, if not yet full converts to Reform, are becoming Reform-curious. Much of life in Britain seems increasingly “weird,” yet no one in the political mainstream seems willing to acknowledge this. 

Anyone who boards a train in the UK will have heard the same government slogan repeatedly played over the PA system: “If you see something that doesn’t look right: see it, say it, sorted.” Officially, we are supposed to tell the authorities about literally anything that arouses our suspicions. Unofficially, if that “something” involves illegal migration or some protected group, we all know we’re expected to simply keep it to ourselves. To keep calm and carry on.

The post Britain’s ‘Turkish Barber’ Phenomenon appeared first on The American Conservative.

Lessons for Venezuela From Two Afghanistan Wars

Lessons for Venezuela From Two Afghanistan Wars

The dysfunctions of Soviet and American interventions in Central Asia could be replicated closer to home.

AFGHANISTAN-TALIBAN-ONEYEAR-AIRPORT
(Photo by WAKIL KOHSAR/AFP via Getty Images)

The 20-year American adventure in Afghanistan, just a little younger than your humble author, came to an end a few years ago. It ended far more unceremoniously than it began: People clinging to the final planes departing from the airport and the almost immediate collapse of the hilariously corrupt government we helped empower were the final humiliations. 

This is not to say there was an alternative on the table; the American exit was always going to be chaotic. Yet it was still what the people voted for: The winning candidates in both 2016 and 2020 vowed to end the war. The former signed the withdrawal agreement, and the latter executed it—a far cry from the Freedom Agenda undergirding the 2005 inaugural address.

The closest analogue for the American invasion of Afghanistan was the Soviet one 20-odd years earlier. Unlike the Soviets, American troops went in initially as invading forces, whereas the Soviets initially entered to stabilize an incumbent Afghan government that had overthrown the last one. Like the Soviets, the Americans found themselves unable to extricate themselves from the country or its politics, although, to their credit, the Soviet-installed leader lasted post-occupation for a few years, whereas the American-backed one didn’t last as long as some milk. 

Like the Soviets, the Americans dreamed of liberating and liberalizing institutions. Vladimir Snegirev, a Soviet advisor pointed out the clash of civilizations set up by the communist invasion when he argued that there 

is a striking contrast, which is only possible here: many of the women on the terraces conceal their faces under the chador—a primitive, medieval superstition; but parachutists are landing in the stadium and they are women too, who grew up in this country. The chador and the parachute. You don’t have to be a prophet to foretell the victory of the parachute.

Thirty years later, the U.S. envoy to Afghanistan argued to widespread mockery that the women of the beleaguered country required “black girl magic”—though, to her credit, she was no less wrong than the Soviets.

Both invasions also engendered significant domestic opposition. Some of the most powerful civilian organizations in the history of the Soviet Union came about as a result of those killed in action, and the mismanagement of the Afghanistan war is arguably one of the things that led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union as a whole. American opposition to the invasion was initially muted, though it also grew as the scale and mismanagement of the conflict became more widely known. By the end, Soviet correspondents sounded as annoyed as your standard mid-2000s paleocon; some argued that “the blood of our sons is being spilled in a foreign land for the interests of foreigners,” which is not dissimilar to an antiwar line taken by some in the United States. 

The Russian experience is more than a historical footnote. It could end up being instructive for the U.S. today. The Soviets couldn’t sustain enthusiasm for a war happening in a country separated from theirs by a bridge; is it any wonder the US was unable to muster continuous support 30 years later in the same place? More to the point, what does this suggest about the U.S. ability to wage war closer to the homeland today, and what citizens may or may not be willing to tolerate?

American enthusiasm for limited strikes in Venezuela is present but muted, especially compared to public opinion in the early days of shock and awe. Sustained occupation of the sort required to ensure skittish capital to commit seems to be more than what either American politicians or the American people are interested in. This is without the general consequence of regime-change operations: the refugees that tend to follow. There is a case to be made that Nicolas Maduro’s downfall could reverse the nearly 8 million refugee outflow under his rule. Yet, given that his vice president and other leaders involved with human-rights abuses are leading a far more paranoid and fragile regime, it seems unlikely there will be a mass return. Given the lack of clarity around the future of the nation, it is more likely that more refugees will be the result. 

In recent history, one benefit of U.S.-backed regime change in the Middle East was that the inevitable refugee crises wound up being far bigger problems for our European or Middle Eastern allies, who were less geographically fortunate than for those of us an ocean away. But if we choose to engage in these activities without that ocean in between, we’d be foolish to think we’d be immune to the consequences of these actions out of a desire to own the hemisphere. The Soviets entered Afghanistan looking to project their empire over more of the continent. They instead wound up destroying the entire thing. 

The post Lessons for Venezuela From Two Afghanistan Wars appeared first on The American Conservative.

BREAKING: Two People Taken Into Custody After SWAT, FBI Raid Tucson Residence Near Nancy Guthrie’s Home… Pima County Sheriff Statement Incoming

NewsNation coverage of a SWAT situation in Pima County, Arizona, featuring reporters discussing developments in the Nancy Guthrie case.

NewsNation coverage of a SWAT situation in Pima County, Arizona, featuring reporters discussing developments in the Nancy Guthrie case.

Update: At 9:50 pm local time, the Pima County Sheriff’s Department said a written statement about tonight’s law enforcement activity near Nancy Guthrie’s home is forthcoming.

Two people have been taken into custody after SWAT and FBI raided a Tucson residence near Nancy Guthrie’s home.

NewsNation reporter Brian Entin is on scene at the location of the raid which is approximately two miles from Nancy Guthrie’s home.

Brian Entin said the raid is connected to the Nancy Guthrie investigation.

According to Brian Entin, two people have been taken into custody.

“We saw dozens of SWAT members. We saw FBI and Sheriff’s out here,” Brian Entin said.

WATCH:

Fox News also reported on this development: A large law enforcement operation is unfolding about two miles from Nancy Guthrie’s home on the eve of the 13th night of the search.

Only one person has been detained, according to Fox News.

Earlier Friday, TGP reported that investigators found DNA in Nancy Guthrie’s home that does not belong to Nancy or anyone close to her.

“DNA other than Nancy Guthrie’s and those in close contact to her has been collected from the property,” the Pima County Sheriff’s Department said on Friday.

“Investigators are working to identify who it belongs to,” they said.

Fox News reported earlier Friday evening that a mobile command center and SWAT vehicle rolled out of the Pima County Sheriff’s Department parking lot.

BREAKING…please check back for updates.

The post BREAKING: Two People Taken Into Custody After SWAT, FBI Raid Tucson Residence Near Nancy Guthrie’s Home… Pima County Sheriff Statement Incoming appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Zohran Mamdani Backtracks on Campaign Promise for Rental Assistance, Claiming it’s too Expensive

Screencap of YouTube video.

New York City’s new socialist mayor is already running out of other people’s money.

In addition to being unable to remove snow or get the trash picked up, Mamdani is now backtracking on a campaign promise to expand the city’s rental assistance program.

He just got grilled by New York lawmakers in Albany who are nervous about his ‘tax the rich’ policies and now this. How long before his base turns on him?

The Post Millennial reports:

Mamdani reverses campaign promise for rental assistance program—turns out it’s too expensive

Socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has reversed on one of his campaign promises to expand a rental assistance program in the Big Apple. The expansion has turned out to be too costly.

As the mayor is confronting a steep fiscal situation in managing the city during his second month in office, Mamdani does not intend to back the growth of a $1 billion-plus initiative known as CityFHEPS, per the New York Times. The plan to initiate the expansion of the program was previously upheld in court after being proposed by the city council.

Mamdani, during his campaign, had promised to expand the voucher program, but in a news conference on Wednesday, he suggested that the expansion of the program is too costly as the city is facing a budget deficit over two years that is around $7 billion.

His administration is now negotiating with activists to settle a lawsuit that sought to force the expansion of the program. The move may stir tensions between himself and his base of support from those in the Democratic Socialists of America, the organization he is also a part of.

No one seems very surprised by this news.

It’s fun and a little terrifying to imagine what New York City is going to look like a year from now.

The post Zohran Mamdani Backtracks on Campaign Promise for Rental Assistance, Claiming it’s too Expensive appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Don’t Trade Away America for Some Soybeans

Don’t Trade Away America for Some Soybeans

Beijing is playing the long game. Washington needs to do the same.

Small,Scale,Farming,With,Tractor,And,Plow,In,Field
(Frank Bach/Shutterstock)

The cliché holds that China plans in decades while America plans in election cycles.

Increasingly, though, our thinking seems to stop even sooner—around the length of a crop cycle.

Not as an agricultural policy, but as a governing instinct.

Soybeans are a solid proxy for how the United States deals with China: small, transactional, immediately legible “wins” pitched as strategic breakthroughs. A shipment resumes, a statistic ticks up, a headline declares progress. Meanwhile, Beijing quietly continues accumulating long-term advantages.

Take the most recent “win.”

China “resumes” U.S. soybean purchases and the headlines dutifully follow. But the underlying data tells a different story. Even after this supposed thaw, U.S. soybean exports to China remain down roughly 99 percent from historical levels. Despite all the hype, China is on track to register its lowest share of U.S. soybean exports since 2002.

The soybean theory rests on a simple insight: America evaluates success through events, while China evaluates success through positioning. We ask whether something happened. They ask whether something became permanent.

China doesn’t need to win negotiations. It shapes the environment in which negotiations occur. That means controlling inputs, bottlenecks, and systems that persist regardless of who occupies office in Washington.

This pattern is not new. It is how U.S.–China diplomacy has operated for decades.

Consider the Phase One trade deal from 2020. It was heralded as a turning point and proof that tough negotiation had forced Beijing to change course. China pledged to purchase an additional $200 billion in U.S. goods and services. The enforcement mechanism, however, relied largely on consultations and discretionary “snapback” tariffs.

In practice, China never came close to meeting its commitments. Independent tracking found Beijing fulfilled only about 58–60 percent of its promised purchases across 2020 and 2021. There were no meaningful penalties. The deal expired. The headlines moved on. China’s industrial assault on America continued.

The soybean theory played out perfectly: a visible agreement, a short-term sense of resolution, and no lasting shift in position.

Go back further and the pattern scales up.

When China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, the argument in Washington was that integration would produce convergence toward liberalization and rules-based behavior. Instead, China used WTO access to accelerate a state-led, mercantilist model while exploiting weak enforcement mechanisms and asymmetric compliance.

Even U.S. trade officials now acknowledge that China retained extensive state control, subsidized national champions, and evaded meaningful discipline while benefiting from open Western markets. The United States gained cheaper consumer goods. China gained industrial dominance.

Once again, America focused on the transaction, while China focused on the system.

Chinese leaders have repeatedly framed competition with the United States as a long historical process in which “time and momentum” favor China. Short-term economic pain is acceptable if it advances long-term positioning. Small concessions are trivial if they buy strategic breathing room.

That is why soybeans are such effective currency.

They are economically marginal to China’s long-term objectives. Beijing can source them elsewhere tomorrow. That makes them a perfect symbolic gesture to absorb attention while larger, irreversible gains continue elsewhere.

The same logic governs rare earths. 

China has secured dominance across the entire supply chain, not just one link. Today, it accounts for roughly 60 to 70 percent of global rare-earth mining and more than 85 to 90 percent of global processing and refining capacity, giving Beijing leverage at both the extraction and transformation stages. That control is not abstract. China has repeatedly shown a willingness to weaponize access through export restrictions, licensing requirements, and informal slowdowns to extract political and economic concessions. 

That leverage has already surfaced in recent talks, where Beijing has quietly floated rare-earth export controls—including what Chinese officials themselves have described as a “nuclear option”—as a reminder that negotiations do not take place on neutral terrain.

The Belt and Road Initiative, China’s global investment strategy, follows the same logic.

It is about geopolitical positioning, not development. Ports, railways, power grids, and debt structures do not disappear when administrations change or trade agreements expire. While America negotiates deals and pushes unpopular cultural programs, China accumulates leverage.

And through all of this, Washington keeps falling for the soybeans. Still.

Empires do not collapse because they fail to negotiate. They collapse because they lose the ability to distinguish between tactics and strategy, symbols and structure.

Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned.

America celebrates soybeans while the architecture of the world is quietly being rearranged.

The post Don’t Trade Away America for Some Soybeans appeared first on The American Conservative.

WATCH: US Strikes Caribbean Drug Boat Killing 3

Infrared imagery showing an unclassified military operation, with a highlighted target on the left and an explosion on the right.

The Department of War announced on Friday evening that Joint Task Force Southern Spear took out another drug boat in the Caribbean Sea earlier, killing three narco-terrorists. 

Nearly 40 drug boats have been destroyed in Operation Southern Spear since September 2, 2025.

Over 120 narco-terrorists have been killed in these strikes.

Video from the strike shows a missile beaming down from the sky and turning the vessel into a smoldering pile of rubble.

WATCH:

US Southern Command posted the following statement on X:

On Feb. 13, at the direction of #SOUTHCOM commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations. Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations. Three narco-terrorists were killed during this action. No U.S. military forces were harmed.

This is the third drug boat taken out by US forces since Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro was captured by US forces in early January.

Trump sent the US Special Forces into Venezuela just days into the new year, to capture Nicolas Maduro, who is now in a New York prison awaiting trial on charges of narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and Destructive Devices against the United States. No American military members were killed in the daring, middle-of-the-night operation.

The US has since seized control of Venezuela’s oil supply and is working with the new government, headed by Delcy Rodriguez, which President Trump recently described as an “extraordinary” relationship.

US forces conducted another strike earlier this week that killed two narco-terrorists and left one alive.

MORE:

US Blows Up Another Drug Boat in Eastern Pacific, Killing Two Narco-Terrorists (VIDEO)

The post WATCH: US Strikes Caribbean Drug Boat Killing 3 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Cory Booker Pretends Not to Know What Replacement Theory is While Questioning Trump Nominee (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/x video.

There was a confirmation hearing today for Jeremy Carl, a scholar who Trump has nominated to fill a position at the State Department.

During one line of questioning, Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey asked Carl about ‘Replacement Theory’ and then played dumb, as if he didn’t know what it is.

We know that Booker knows what it is because it’s exactly what the Democrats tried to do to America during Joe Biden’s presidency.

When asked about it, Carl says:

“Senator, I think the Democratic Party through its immigration policies has certainly shown signs of that.”

Watch:

Again, this is exactly what the Democrats tried to do under Biden. Booker is fooling no one. We can see it happening in Europe right now. Look at what just happened in Spain.

From The Federalist:

Mass Amnesty In Spain Heralds The End Of Nationhood

A remarkably candid column appeared in the New York Times this week by Spain’s left-wing Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who recently announced his government would grant amnesty to half a million illegal immigrants living in Spain. Framed as an argument for “why the West needs migrants,” Sánchez’s essay is really an admission of moral collapse, and a frank declaration that he intends to destroy his nation in exchange for short-term economic gain.

It is an admission of moral collapse because the Spanish government has signaled its willingness to erase their country, put the interests of foreigners above those of native citizens, and turn Spain into a magnet for Third World migration.

There is some irony in this, because Sánchez claims the primary reason to enact mass amnesty is moral. He argues that because so many Spaniards emigrated to the United States and Europe beginning in the middle of the last century, and because Spain’s economy is now flourishing, the country must grant amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants: “It is our duty to become the welcoming and tolerant society that our own relatives would have hoped to find on the other side of our borders.”

And what about this recent viral moment from Eugene Wu?

Democrats absolutely want to replace American voters. They want a more compliant electorate that depends on them for handouts.

The post Cory Booker Pretends Not to Know What Replacement Theory is While Questioning Trump Nominee (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Slams Trump, Says He ‘Squandered’ America’s Global Leadership (VIDEO)

Business professional speaking at a press conference, wearing glasses and a blue suit, with a focused expression against a light background featuring a logo.

Business professional speaking at a press conference, wearing glasses and a blue suit, with a focused expression against a light background featuring a logo.
Screensoht of Freidrich Merz addressing the Munich Security Conference.

German Chancellor Freidrich Merz has launched an attack on President Trump at the Munich Security Conference.

Merz, who is ironically one of Europe’s more conservative leaders, said that under the Trump presidency, America’s claim to global leadership “has been challenged, and possibly squandered.”

“A divide has opened up between Europe and the United States,” Merz said.

“Vice President JD Vance said this very openly here in Munich a year ago. He was right. The culture war of the MAGA movement is not ours.”

“Freedom of speech ends here with us when that speech goes against human dignity and the constitution.

”We do not believe in tariffs and protectionism, but in free trade.”

Having given most his speech in German, Merz then addressed his American counterparts directly in English.

“In the era of great power rivalry, even the United States will not be powerful enough to go it alone.

”Dear friends, being a part of NATO is not only Europe’s competitive advantage,” he continued. “It is also the United States’ competitive advantage.”

Meanwhile, Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Söder accused Trump of showing disrespect toward Europe.

“We will respect your leadership,” Soder said. “But maybe you pay us a little more respect.”

Back in December, Merz denounced parts of the latest U.S. National Security strategy as “unacceptable.”

“Some of it is comprehensible, some of it is understandable,” he said at the time. “Some of it is unacceptable to us from a European perspective.”

“I see no need for the Americans to now want to save democracy in Europe.“

”If it would need to be saved, we would manage on our own.”

The post German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Slams Trump, Says He ‘Squandered’ America’s Global Leadership (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Cause of Death Revealed for Doctor Found Dead and Naked in Miami Dollar Tree Freezer

Woman in a pink dress holding a book, standing on a staircase in a stylish interior with red accents.

Woman in a pink dress holding a book, standing on a staircase in a stylish interior with red accents.
Female doctor found in Dollar Tree freezer: Helen Massiell Garay Sanchez.

The cause of death for the woman who was found dead and naked inside a walk-in freezer in a Miami Dollar Tree store last year was revealed this week.

As previously reported, a female doctor was found dead in a Dollar Tree freezer in Miami in December.

32-year-old Helen Massiell Garay Sanchez was found deceased and naked inside the store’s walk-in freezer in Little Havana.

Sanchez reportedly entered the Dollar Tree the night before she was found. She made no purchases and was found in an area designated for employees only.

At the time, authorities said no foul play was suspected.

It was revealed on Wednesday that Sanchez died of environmental hypothermia, with ethanol use (alcohol) being a contributory cause.

“According to the Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner’s Office, the cause of death for 32-year-old Helen Massiell Garay Sanchez was environmental hypothermia, with ethanol use being a contributory cause,” NBC Miami reported.

“Her toxicology report showed that her ethanol levels were 0.112%. Ethanol is the active ingredient in alcoholic beverages,” the outlet reported.

A medical expert said Sanchez may have taken her clothes off after she became confused and disoriented as the hypothermia set in.

“Originally from Nicaragua, Dr. Garay dedicated her life to medicine, earning recognition as a Anesthesiologist specializing in congenital heart disease whose work brought hope and healing to countless children and families,” the Sanchez family said on GoFundMe.

“Her compassion, skill, and commitment to saving young lives defined both her career and her character,” Sanchez’s family said on GoFundMe.

“Beyond her profession, she was a loving mother to two children, who remain in Nicaragua and were the center of her world. Her strength, warmth, and unwavering love for her family will always be remembered,” the family said.

“Dr. Helen Garay passed away following a tragic accident while abroad. Her family’s greatest wish is to bring her home to Nicaragua so she may receive a proper funeral and final resting place surrounded by loved ones,” the family said.

More on this story from Law&Crime Network:

The post Cause of Death Revealed for Doctor Found Dead and Naked in Miami Dollar Tree Freezer appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Gavin Newsom Tells European Leaders Trump is Temporary, Will be Gone in Three Years (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

California Governor Gavin Newsom was at the Munich Security conference this week, along with other Democrat hopefuls like AOC.

During his remarks, he stressed to European leaders that Trump is temporary and will leave office in three years, which is interesting because Democrats are constantly claiming that Trump is a dictator who will never leave office.

He seems to be telling these people that they can just wait out Trump’s presidency.

Newsom doesn’t seem to understand that he is also in office temporarily.

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

GAVIN NEWSOM: Never in the history of the United States of America has there been a more destructive president than the current occupant in the White House in Washington, D.C. He’s trying to recreate the 19th century. He’s a wholly owned subsidiary of big oil, gas, and coal. He’s quite literally reopening coal plants in the United States of America…

We’re proving at scale that we can implement, we can compete, and we can dominate. But Donald Trump is trying to turn back the clock. And so we’re showing up, but we’re also showing what can be accomplished — the power of emulation.

We are in the great implementation in my state.

Final word. I hope, if there’s nothing else I can communicate today: Donald Trump is temporary. He’ll be gone in three years. California is a stable and reliable partner in this space, and it’s important for folks to understand the temporary nature of this current administration in relationship to the issue of climate change and climate policy.

Here’s the video:

In this clip, Newsom praises China’s climate policies.

Newsom is such a snake. You get the sense that he’d step over his own mother to gain power. Perhaps he should spend some more time in his own state, helping to get homes rebuilt from the fires over a year ago.

The post Gavin Newsom Tells European Leaders Trump is Temporary, Will be Gone in Three Years (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.