Uncovering the Agenda Behind Snow White’s Evil Queen Being Portrayed as Transgender

The classic tale of Snow White has recently come under fire for its portrayal of the iconic villain, the Evil Queen, being played by a transgender actor. Many are applauding this move as a step towards diversity and representation in Hollywood. However, from a conservative standpoint, there is a deeper agenda at play here.

First and foremost, let’s address the elephant in the room: the blatant disregard for the original story. Snow White is a timeless fairy tale that has been enjoyed by generations. It is a story of good versus evil, beauty versus vanity. Changing the gender of the Evil Queen goes against the core message of the story and undermines the impact it has on young minds.

Woke Disney makes Snow White Characters Trans at Disney World Park https://t.co/P3qwsucX2E pic.twitter.com/cwIK1Niyy1

— Fandom Pulse (@fandompulse) April 23, 2024

Moreover, this casting choice raises questions about the motive behind it. Is it truly about inclusivity, or is it just another way for the liberal agenda to push their beliefs onto society? It is no secret that the entertainment industry has a history of promoting progressive ideals, and this latest move only adds to the concern.

One cannot help but wonder, what is the purpose of this change? Is it to normalize transgender individuals in the eyes of the public? While conservatives believe in treating all individuals with respect and equality, we also value the importance of preserving traditional values and beliefs. This forced inclusion can do more harm than good, as it may confuse and even influence impressionable young minds.

Pedoville, already losing lots of money due to woke policy, just can’t stop.https://t.co/xXlYNbs4Fp

— Donna Patriot Ancestor (@DonnaAncestor) April 25, 2024

Additionally, let’s not forget that this casting decision also has practical implications. The Evil Queen is a character known for her beauty and seduction, qualities that may be more fitting for a female actress. By casting a transgender actor, the film is essentially rewriting the character and changing the dynamics of the story. This raises the question of whether this is a necessary change or just another attempt at being politically correct.

But beyond the surface-level concerns, this casting choice also brings up larger issues within the transgender community. By promoting the idea that anyone can play any role regardless of their biological sex, are we not diminishing the struggles and experiences of those who identify as transgender? This narrative reinforces the idea that gender is fluid and can be changed at will, which goes against the beliefs of many conservatives.

In the end, the decision to cast a transgender actor as the Evil Queen in Snow White may seem like a small, insignificant detail. However, when we look at it from a conservative point of view, we see the bigger picture and the potential consequences it may have. It is important to question and critically analyze the motives behind such changes, and not simply accept them blindly in the name of progress.

In conclusion, while diversity and inclusivity are important, it should not come at the expense of altering classic stories and promoting a certain agenda. Snow White’s Evil Queen being portrayed as transgender is just another example of the liberal agenda seeping into the entertainment industry. It is time to take a step back and reevaluate the impact of such decisions on our society.

What are YOUR thoughts on Disney?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.

The post Uncovering the Agenda Behind Snow White’s Evil Queen Being Portrayed as Transgender appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Beautiful Eva Vlaardingerbroek Delivers Historic Speech “The Great Replacement Reality” at CPAC Hungary and Euro Elites Are Losing It – Elon Musk Weighs In – VIDEO

Eva Vlaardinbroek exposes the end game of the globalist elites and their Great Replacement Theory at CPACHungary in April 2024.

CPAC Hungary was held this weekend in Budapest, Hungary.

The conference was attended by conservatives from though out the continent and America.

The unexpected highlight of the weekend conference may have been the riveting speech by the beautiful Eva Vlaardingerbroek.

Eva did not hold back in her defense of Christian Europe and the current assault by the globalist left to destroy our civilization.

Here is the transcript from Eva Vlaardingerbroek’s CPAC speech.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek: Hello, Hungary. Hello, Budapest. Hello, fellow Europeans and American friends. Thank you so much for having me. Allow me to skip from Mathies for a moment and dive right into a subject that is not so cheerful, but very, very necessary to discuss. Let me walk you through the past seven days in Europe.

This week in Stockholm, three Three elderly women in their 70s were stabbed in broad daylight on the streets. In London, four people were stabbed in a time span of just 42 hours. In Paris, hundreds of Afghan migrants took to the street to riot. And – also in France, yet another church was burned down to the ground. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is just a few incidents in just a couple of days on our beautiful continent. But we all know that these incidents aren’t incidents anymore. If there’s one thing that’s for sure is that we know, and our governments also know, that there is a link between mass migration and crime.

In a Dutch city of Dordrecht, something interesting happened the other day. They announced, and this is a small city in the Netherlands, in my home country, that a new asylum center will be put in that little town. And what did the municipality do? They said, We are going to offer citizens who live in the vicinity of this center, a thousand euros to take extra safety measures. Our new reality in Europe consists of frequent rapes, stabbings, killings, murders, shootings, even beheadings. But let me be clear about one thing. This did not used to happen before. This is a newly imported problem.

Samuel P. Huntington predicted this over 25 years ago when he wrote, and I quote, In the new world of mass migration, the most pervasive, important, and dangerous conflict will not be between the social classes. They will not be between the rich and the poor. They will be between peoples belonging to different cultural entities. Tribal wars and ethnic conflicts will occur within civilizations. Well, boy, was he right? And the worst part is, we as a society seem to have become indifferent to it. When another white boy or a white girl dies at the hand of an immigrant, We might shake our head, we might let out a sigh, we might even get angry for a minute or two, and then we go on with our lives. We offer the family thoughts and prayers, but nothing ever changes.

Ladies and gentlemen, what does that say about us? This is the response of a society that has already given up, a society that has already accepted its defeat. But is this true? Have we given up? Do we really accept the new reality that our globalist leaders have in mind for us? I know one thing for sure, and that is that if nothing changes, if we don’t start to seriously fight for our continent, for our religion, for our people, our countries, then this time that we live in will go down in history as the in which Western nations no longer had to get invaded by hostile armies in order to be conquered. This time will then go down in history as the period in which the invader was actively invited in by a corrupt elite. And not only did this corrupt elite invite the enemy in, they made the native population pay for it, too.

Everyone who has eyes can see it. The native, white, Christian, European population is being replaced at an ever-accelerating rate. Let me back this up for you with some statistics from my home country. Let’s take Amsterdam, the capital. Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants. Of course, most of these immigrants come from non-Christian, non-western, African and Middle Eastern countries. Conclusion, the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities. But let’s look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion, native population outnumbered. Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants. Conclusion, native population, majorly outnumbered. Other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon if they haven’t already.

I’m going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The great replacement theory is no longer a theory, it’s reality. What’s interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say that it’s a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent. Dutch national disgrace, and dubbed Climate Pope, Frantz Timmermans, already stated in 2015 that diversity is humanity’s destiny, and that Europe will be diverse.

And of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the word diversity. It means less white people, less of you. Imagine this in an Asian or an African country. Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable, unimaginable. Reasonable. So what in the world is wrong with our leaders? The underlying sentiment of what they say is always the same. Our establishment claims that white people are evil and that Our history is somehow fundamentally different from that of others. Consciously or unconsciously, they have sucked up the lies and the anti-white dogmas of the neo-Marxist critical race theory.

That’s what the totalitarians in Brussels are trying to force you, the Hungarian people, a sovereign nation, to accept immigrants despite the fact that the population has said no, and so has the government. But make no mistake, the majority of the Dutch people haven’t asked for this either. Just like Brussels is forcing Hungary to accept these words of immigrants, they are doing the same now, even in the smallest of towns in the Netherlands. No part may remain remain Dutch in the traditional sense of the word. No part of Europe may remain European. It’s not difficult to understand why. If the old Europe still exists in certain places, then people will be able to compare the new Europe to the old, and news flash, they will prefer the old. That’s why the Eurocrats hate Hungary so much.

And their message is clear. Our way of life, our Christian religion, our nations, they have to go without exception. Their vision of the future is the neoliberal, unrecognizable Europe, where every city becomes like Brussels. Ugly, dirty, unsafe, zero social cohesion, where the buildings are constantly under construction and they never, ever seem to finish. Even when they do, the end result is ugly or somehow than what they started with. What are we left with? A permanent state of isolation, confusion, and disorientation. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the New World Order.

So what’s the antidote? A strong Christian Europe of sovereign Nation States. That’s why we need to outright reject the lie that nationalism causes war. It’s not nationalism or national sovereignty that causes war. It’s expansionism. Where in Europe do we find that nowadays? In one place and one place only, Brussels. Isn’t it funny how the same people who erode our national sovereignty and love to do it, give it all up to the Eurocrats there, that those people are now telling us that we need to spend billions and billions of euros on the national sovereignty of Ukraine? It’s a joke, honestly, and it’s a pretty sick, expensive, and dangerous joke.

During a recent interview, I got asked by an interviewer, Do you think that you ever go too far? Do you think that you’re ever too radical? I thought about it for a second and I said, No, I don’t think I go too far. Truth be told, ladies and gentlemen, I think we in Europe do not go far enough. I think that if we really think about the organized structural attack on our civilization, that we don’t do enough. Do we do enough to stop the attack on our families, on our continent, on our countries, on our religion. When we hear about another murder, another stabbing of a young innocent child, do we do enough? When we know that our national sovereignty has been given up in last than a century to Brussels, Do we do enough? When we hear that Christian kids in Germany are now converting to Islam to fit in, do we do enough? I don’t think so. The Totalitarian Institute of the European Union needs to come down. Let me be clear, I don’t believe in reforms. When the foundation of your institution is rotten, and that is the case in Brussels, you can rebuild the house on top of it all you want, but it’s still going to crumble.

So the only answer is the Tower of Babel needs to be destroyed. Ladies and gentlemen, we are the daughters and sons of the greatest nations on Earth. And we need to ask ourselves, what has happened to us? Where do we come from? And more importantly, where are we going? Our elites have declared a war on us, and now it is time for us to put on the full armor of God, fight back, and win. Thank you so much.

Here it is! The full speech I gave at #CPACHungary that the establishment is losing its absolute mind about.

I spoke the forbidden truth: The Great Replacement is no longer a theory – it’s reality. White Europeans are being replaced in their own countries at an ever… pic.twitter.com/L33UE3P6tv

— Eva Vlaardingerbroek (@EvaVlaar) April 27, 2024

Elon Musk later weighed in on Eva’s remarks.

“The problem with “Great Replacement Theory” is that it fails to address the foundational issue of low birth rates.

Record low birth rates are leading to population collapse in Europe and even faster population collapse in most of Asia. Immigration is low in Asia, so there is no “replacement” going on, the countries are simply shrinking away.

If this doesn’t turn around, then any countries on Earth with low birth rates will become empty of people and fall into ruin, like the remains we see of the many long dead civilizations.”

The problem with “Great Replacement Theory” is that it fails to address the foundational issue of low birth rates.

Record low birth rates are leading to population collapse in Europe and even faster population collapse in most of Asia. Immigration is low in Asia, so there is no… https://t.co/ddGM5R6vWh

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 28, 2024

Eva’s speech already has 36.7 million views in less than 48 hours.

This speech is the reason why the Biden administration and Western elites are so desperate to control speech. They can’t allow the people to have access to free thoughts and differing ideas. Because the elites are leading Western civilization to ruin. It appears that was their plan all along.

The post Beautiful Eva Vlaardingerbroek Delivers Historic Speech “The Great Replacement Reality” at CPAC Hungary and Euro Elites Are Losing It – Elon Musk Weighs In – VIDEO appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

RINO Utah Governor Cox Runs from Reporter Tayler Hansen and Hides in Vehicle Rather Than Answer Questions on Utah’s Sanctuary State Practices

TENET reporter Taylor Hansen is held back by security at the Utah GOP Convention when he tried to ask Governor Cox a few questions.

The Utah Republican Party State Convention was held Saturday in Salt Lake City.

The theme this year appeared to be TAKE BACK YOUR RED STATE.

During introductions on Saturday woke Governor Spencer Cox was LOUDLY BOOED by the Republican crowd. Cox is famous for introducing himself with his pronouns when speaking to school children.

Challenger Phil Lyman was cheered enthusiastically by the same Utah crowd.

Phil Lyman later picked up 67% of the convention votes to defeat sitting Governor Spencer Cox!

Loudly booed, @GovCox loses Utah’s GOP Convention with @phil_lyman receiving 67.54% of the vote!

TAKE BACK YOUR RED STATE UTAH!
Phil Lyman for Governor!#utleg #utpol #GOP pic.twitter.com/0GNGSZjzJb

— EMBER (@upliftandlift) April 27, 2024

Nate Lyman was thrilled with the win telling supporters, “I am proud to announce that I have won Utah’s Republican State Nominating Convention in my campaign for Governor. I am beyond grateful for the unwavering support that I have received. I mean it from the bottom of my heart when I say we could not have done this without committed grassroots patriots across the state. Our victory tonight gives us the momentum we need going into the June 25th primary election. Together, we can ensure Better Roads Ahead for Utah. Thank you again for your support today.”

I am proud to announce that I have won Utah’s Republican State Nominating Convention in my campaign for Governor.

I am beyond grateful for the unwavering support that I have received. I mean it from the bottom of my heart when I say we could not have done this without committed… pic.twitter.com/NXOBc7TJ9I

— Phil Lyman for Governor (@phil_lyman) April 28, 2024

Sadly, the booing and the election loss was not the end of Governor Cox’s bad day.

Reporter Tayler Hansen followed Governor Spencer from the venue hoping to get the unpopular governor to answer questions on his secret sanctuary state policies.

Governor Spencer ran outside and hid in his vehicle behind tinted windows.

After being boo’ed throughout his speech at the Utah Nominating Convention @GovCox RAN outside and hid in his vehicle behind security to avoid questioning from TENET Reporter @TaylerUSA about his lies regarding Utah not being a sanctuary state. (It is)

Tayler attempted to… pic.twitter.com/8VG0g6NKFU

— TENET Media (@watchTENETnow) April 28, 2024

The post RINO Utah Governor Cox Runs from Reporter Tayler Hansen and Hides in Vehicle Rather Than Answer Questions on Utah’s Sanctuary State Practices appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

“Obviously We’ll Wait for Leader Jeffries to Figure Out That Solution” – Reps Jared Moskowitz, Hakeem Jeffries Suggest Democrats Would Likely Save The Speaker After $61 Billion Ukraine Aid Deal

Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) led the House Republican Caucus in prayer after he was elected as their candidate for U.S. House Speaker.

Mike Johnson’s betrayal of Republican voters may have saved him the Speakership as his Democrat colleagues plan to come to his rescue amidst a threat of Motion to Vacate by America First Republicans in the House.

Now that the GOP only has a one-vote majority in the House thanks to the selfish early resignations by Kevin McCarthy (RINO-CA), Ken Buck (RINO-CO), and Mike Gallagher (RINO-WI) along with the stupid ousting of George Santos (R-NY), Johnson needs only to appeal to the Democrats and overwhelming majority of RINOs within the Republican conference.

The news that Democrats are backing Johnson comes as Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) recently announced he will co-sponsor Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Motion to Vacate the Chair and remove Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House over his ongoing support for Ukraine as our southern border remains wide open.

Greene filed and announced her motion after the House passed a $1.2 trillion spending bill with more support from Democrats than Republicans. The vote – 286 to 134 – had 185 Democrats and 101 Republicans voting ‘yay.’ It was later passed by the Democrat-controlled Senate.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Johnson recently cut a deal with Democrats in passing three bills to hand out $95 Billion in “foreign aid” to Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, and other non-U.S.-involved conflict zones around the world. Of the $95 Billion, $61 Billion was allocated for Ukraine.

Rep. Andy Biggs said last week, “The Speaker actually put together a coalition with Democrats to get the Ukraine funding that was $65 billion or so.” Prior to this and the passage of $95 billion in aid, The Gateway Pundit reported that Johnson was negotiating with the Biden regime to introduce a substantial funding package for foreign conflicts and whip up opposition from the Democrats to a Motion to Vacate against him.

The handout to Ukraine was sold to the American people as a “loan.” However, as The Gateway Pundit reported, the package Johnson announced Wednesday includes terms that will allow the President to cancel 50% of Ukraine’s debt after November 15, 2024, and the remaining 50% after January 1, 2024. No wonder Joe Biden came out “strongly” in support of the package, urging the House and Senate to pass it.

This means after President Trump wins the 2024 election, as expected, Joe Biden can cancel 50% of Ukraine’s debt before his term ends in January. However, if Biden and the Democrats pull off another stolen election, they can forgive 100% of Ukraine’s debt a little over one year later. This isn’t a loan. It’s a handout. It was a total surrender on the part of Mike Johnson.

Johnson’s surrender and betrayal of the conservative agenda could be explained by the fact that one of his top handlers aides, Policy Director Dan Ziegler, is a former lobbyist with clients who have a financial interest in Ukraine aid.

Additionally, as The Gateway Pundit reported, Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) revealed that only $44 to $47 billion–40%–of the $113 billion that the United States has handed out to Ukraine is lethal aid.” So what was the other 66 to $69 billion for?” Roy asked on Bannon’s War Room.

Two bills from the latest handout package, the Indo-Pacific Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 and the Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024, both passed the House with more support from Democrats than Republicans. This comes after Republicans under Mike Johnson’s leadership gave up a $1.2 trillion spending bill, also with more support from Democrats than Republicans, and reauthorization for warrantless searches of Americans under FISA Section 702.

All 112 “Nay” votes on a bill to send $60 billion to Ukraine came from Republicans, with 101 Republicans voting “AYE” with 210 Democrats. Every single Democrat voted in favor of sending additional taxpayer money to secure a foreign border, more than doubling the number of Republican votes in favor.

Speaker Johnson arrogantly declared himself a “wartime speaker” before announcing the massive foreign aid package to fund multiple countries oceans away — but not the United States. The United States is not even at war with anyone!

In a more recent development, the Pentagon confirmed on Wednesday that the U.S. secretly sent long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems to Ukraine as part of the $61 billion dollar package passed by Democrats, RINOs, and Speaker Johnson and signed by Joe Biden.

Steve Bannon on Saturday told Ben Harnwell he is “very disturbed about Johnson,” calling the latest move a “criminal conspiracy.”

Then, on Sunday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that the U.S. and Ukraine are “working on fixing specific levels of support for this year and for the next ten years,” seemingly taking away President Trump’s power to do anything once passed.

JUST IN: $61 Billion Was Just The Beginning – Ukrainian President Zelenskyy Announces 10 Year Funding Agreement with U.S.: “GLORY TO UKRAINE” (VIDEO)

Per Axios, “many Democrats have gone on the record to say they would not support ousting Johnson, especially after he passed aid to Ukraine.”

Axios reports,

A centrist House Democrat said Sunday there is “no way” his colleagues will allow Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to remove House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.).

Why it matters: Greene has not ruled out forcing a vote on her motion to vacate against Johnson when the House returns to session on Monday.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) has also suggested Democrats would likely save the speaker.

What he’s saying: Asked on MSNBC’s “The Weekend” how Democrats feel about Greene’s motion to vacate, Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said “obviously we’ll wait for Leader Jeffries to figure out that solution.”

The post “Obviously We’ll Wait for Leader Jeffries to Figure Out That Solution” – Reps Jared Moskowitz, Hakeem Jeffries Suggest Democrats Would Likely Save The Speaker After $61 Billion Ukraine Aid Deal appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

POS Mitch McConnell Bashes Trump on Meet the Press – Will Stay on as Senate Leader Until After Election So He Can Work Diligently to Keep Trump from White House

Let’s all quit pretending, the Republican Party is dead.
Dirty Trump-hater Mitch McConnell trashed President Trump on Meet the Press.

If GOP members of Congress are not already voting with Democrats, they’re too weak to stand up to the Marxist mob destroying our country.

On Sunday morning Mitch McConnell sat down for an interview with far-left Meet the Press, a virulently anti-Trump “news” program.

During his interview POS McConnell blamed President Trump for the events on January 6, 2021.

Via Kyle Becker.

“I don’t regret anything I said… I haven’t taken anything I said then back.”

Mitch McConnell stands by remarks that former President Trump is “practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of January 6” and should potentially be held “criminally responsible” pic.twitter.com/UvUz9GvjkG

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) April 28, 2024

It is widely known at this time that President Trump called for 10,000 to 20,000 National Guard troops to the US Capitol two days before the January 6 protests.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi turned them down. DC Mayor Muriel Bowser also turned them down!

Earlier this month National Guard whistleblowers testified before Congress that NOT ONLY was the National Guard turned away by Nancy Pelosi before January 6, but the National Guard was ready to be deployed on January 6th but the Pentagon delayed their orders until HOURS AFTer the violence started.

PELOSI’S INSURRECTION: National Guard Whistleblowers to Testify They Were Ready to Be Deployed on Jan.6 But Pentagon Delayed Orders – Will DESTROY J6 Committee’s BIG LIE!

Mitch McConnell knows this yet he lied again about President Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021.
Now you know why he is referred to here as a POS.

McConnell is determined to screw Trump in the 2024 election just like his pal Paul Ryan did in 2018.

More…

Former Capitol Police CHIEF Steven Sund reveals what REALLY HAPPENED on J6. Democrats have been LYING about J6 the ENTIRE Time. J6 will FOREVER be remembered as the day Nancy Pelosi FORCED Capitol police to stand down AFTER President Trump ordered 20,000 troops to be there…

— Kenny (@Kennykwh1120) April 28, 2024

The post POS Mitch McConnell Bashes Trump on Meet the Press – Will Stay on as Senate Leader Until After Election So He Can Work Diligently to Keep Trump from White House appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Beatrix Potter: Drawn to Nature

Beatrix Potter: Drawn to Nature

Peter Rabbit’s world is cozy but rife with peril.

The Morgan Library & Museum

February 23–June 9

Like a lot of kids with discerning parents, when I was growing up, I owned a box set containing all twenty-three of Beatrix Potter’s Peter Rabbit tales for children. It is sitting beside me as I write these words, though of course some of the books are missing and all the white slipcovers have long since disappeared. I have loved these books since before I could read, for the same reason that everyone else loves them: The illustrations are comforting and cozy, just like the chamomile tea which old Mrs. Rabbit gives Peter after his misadventure in the McGregor garden. 

As soon as I learned to read, I found that Potter’s words are often even more entertaining than her pictures. The charming art sometimes belies the content of the stories. Beatrix Potter’s world is comforting and cozy, but it is also rife with peril. Animals behave like animals: rats hunt kittens; foxes trick hens; and pigs live in constant fear of the butcher. Potter’s human beings are amusingly lifelike as well. When they get involved in these affairs, they often prove themselves not much more civilized than the animals. Sometimes they are only dolls, playacting as human beings. 

For children reading these books for the first time (and for parents rereading them for the ten thousandth time), Potter’s charm derives largely from the wry seriousness with which she treats her artificial little world. Her characters wear waistcoats and smoke pipes and worry about their taxes, but they also claw and bite at each other, just as we do in real life. “Old Mr. Bunny had no opinion whatever of cats,” she writes of Benjamin Bunny’s father before he thrashes a cat that has imprisoned his son under a basket. He then switches his son for his recklessness. My daughter laughs every time I read that sequence aloud; I smile whenever I remember it. This is just what it means to grow up. 

I think everyone who grew up on Beatrix Potter has some similar memory of a story or even of one line. Once made, her impression on the mind is lasting. Steven Runciman, who wrote a wildly popular revisionist history of the Crusades in the 1950s (these days generally unread), often claimed that she taught him everything he knew about storytelling. I don’t know if most people would go that far, but every now and then, I’m sure, those who read her as a child find themselves remembering at odd hours a stray line from Peter Rabbit or Squirrel Nutkin or Jeremy Fisher

For myself, my favorite of Potter’s books is probably The Tale of Ginger and Pickles, which is less a story and more a diatribe against the credit economy with a few pictures attached. It concerns a yellow tom-cat (Ginger) and a terrier (Pickles) who run a store frequented by moles, mice, rabbits, and the like. Ginger cannot bear to serve the mice—he wants to eat them—and Pickles feels the same way about the rats. In any case, the store is popular with these animals all the same because its owners never collect on anyone’s line of credit. Obviously, this is no way to run a business, and soon Ginger and Pickles are forced to eat their own goods. Pickles has no money for a dog license and lives in constant terror of the police. Ginger falls behind on the store’s taxes, and so the two close up shop. A succession of stores follow them, each with their own fatal flaws, until a chicken named Sally Henny-Penny opens up a successful shop, advertising her services with some lines artfully lifted from Christina Rossetti’s “Goblin Market.” 

The humor in all this is the utmost seriousness with which the vagaries of running a small business are related. “It would never do to eat our customers,” Pickles remarks sadly. “They would leave us and go to Tabitha Twitchit’s.” “On the contrary, they would go nowhere,” Ginger replies gloomily. And later, Potter writes of another failing shop: “When Mr. John Dormouse was complained to, he stayed in bed, and would say nothing but ‘very snug’; which is no way to carry on a retail business.” I should add here that Potter herself was a shrewd businesswoman, a natural inventor who played a large role in inventing modern kids’ books merchandising.

In fact, Potter was a woman of many gifts, among them a knack for sheep farming, a passion for land conservation, and the ability to organize groups of Girl Guides. In all things, she was guided by her keen powers of observation, both of the natural world and of the ways in which people interact with it. There was nothing sentimental or childish about her. She was not maternal, but she was said to have been warm all the same. It comes as no surprise that she had no children of her own.

This side of Potter comes through clearly at an exhibition of her artwork on view at the Morgan Library in New York through June. It includes, in addition to the original illustrations for the Peter Rabbit books, her botanical and mycological studies (she was fascinated by mushrooms) and many of her personal belongings (her gardening shoes were clearly the basis for Benjamin’s clogs). When I took my two-year-old daughter, she made a beeline for the box set of the children’s books placed out on display. Before anyone could stop her, she opened the box and pulled out the copy of Benjamin Bunny and showed it to me—“just like at home,” she said. The security guards at the Morgan were kind enough to let her carry the book around the exhibition until we left. I was once thrown out of a museum for attempting to play George Gershwin’s piano, so I was a bit surprised by this response. But I think it was just the Potter effect: Her work brings out the best in people—a little warmth, generosity, and likely a recollection of one’s own childhood.

The post Beatrix Potter: Drawn to Nature appeared first on The American Conservative.

Breaking: Rioting Pro-Hamas Students Tear Down Barricades at George Washington University Just Blocks From White House; Palestinian Flag and Keffiyeh Draped on Statue of Nation’s First President

Several hundred pro-Hamas students, angered by an attempted arrest of a protester by police, rioted at George Washington University overnight, located a few blocks west of the White House in Washington, D.C. The students tore down barricades that had blocked off an earlier attempted ‘occupy’ protest on campus grounds at University Yard (U-Yard). The students retook U-Yard, erecting tents and planting Palestinian flags on the pile of barricades. A Palestinian flag and keffiyeh draped on a statue of our nation’s first President George Washington at the start of the protest several days ago were still desecrating America’s founding father.

The protest is part of an attempt to foment communist revolution in the U.S., using college campuses as a focal point, with an alliance of terrorist supporting communists and Islamists.

GWU had cleared the ‘occupy’ protest at U-Yard several days ago and was allowing only about twenty protesters to remain. The D.C. government refused to help, reportedly fearing bad optics. D.C. allowed the protesters to take over a city street in front of the campus area for the weekend. Like magic, dozens of tents looking just the ones at other campus protests sprung up on H Street.

Before the riot, GWU had sent out a statement to alumni Sunday night explaining their handling of the protest:

GWU administration sent out this update to alumni this evening on their flailing response to the sprawling protests pic.twitter.com/0lSP083Xqn

— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) April 29, 2024

Late Sunday night, campus police officers were prevented by the protesters from arresting one of the activists. A riot ensued where the barricades were torn down.

Around just before midnight the barricades surrounding the encampment fell at #GWU and people flooded into the plaza. Tossing the barricades into a pile in the center of University Yard. ( for @GettyImages) pic.twitter.com/4FMz4EpWD2

— Kent Nishimura (@kentnish) April 29, 2024

Video of the H Street weekend encampment before the riot, “Outside groups are providing all kinds of help to radical students”:

Encampment has taken over and closed H Street. Does @MayorBowser and @CMBrookePinto support anti-Semitism? pic.twitter.com/chOx7cVqz0

— CapitolIntel (@CapitolIntel) April 27, 2024

Pro-Hamas students at @GWtweets expanded their encampment tent on H Street in D.C., blocking the road. GWU requested that the @DCPoliceDept remove them, but @dcmayorsoffice opposed fearing negative publicity. Outside groups are providing all kinds of help to radical students. pic.twitter.com/AJoxSUmgXb

— Navid Mohebbi نوید محبی (@navidmohebbi) April 28, 2024

organizers call for protection of people’s encampment – protesters who have set up tents in H street

video: gabrielle mcnamee pic.twitter.com/x9mOdSUGQn

— tyler davis (@tylerrdavis_) April 27, 2024

Video of the “de-arrest” that set off the riot:

George Washington University now
COPS ATTEMPT TO ARREST STUDENT IN DMV SJP ENCAMPMENT AND COMMUNITY SUCCESSFULLY DEARRESTS!
COMMUNITY SUPPORT IS ESSENTIAL! ALL OUT TO GW pic.twitter.com/qhiWDHFYbe

— Kholoud (@Kholoud24583790) April 29, 2024

Photos and videos of the torn down barricades. Heavy use of chanting to foment revolution on campus:

Students and community members have re-taken the George Washington University occupation in DC, breaking through barriers and piling them onto the middle of the occupied yard.

After the DC police attempted to arrest a student, the community also successfully de-arrested them. pic.twitter.com/yOQNyAb6Li

— The News Room (@TheNewsRoom0) April 29, 2024

current scene inside encampment, protesters standing on top of pile of pulled down barricades pic.twitter.com/Rvndf7RFzj

— tyler davis (@tylerrdavis_) April 29, 2024

GWU students have torn down the barricades surrounding their encampment and piled them in the middle of the U Yard quad on campus. pic.twitter.com/9pNkhvXcNO

— Andrew Leyden (@PenguinSix) April 29, 2024

“Say it loud and say it clear, liberation is near!”

protesters on street forming human chain to protect those inside U-Yard pic.twitter.com/8OoBHyXnUR

— tyler davis (@tylerrdavis_) April 29, 2024

more shots of tents across the entirety of U-Yard pic.twitter.com/WRcVIdivOG

— tyler davis (@tylerrdavis_) April 29, 2024

“From U-Yard to Palestine, globalize the intifada!”

At George Washington University. “Peaceful protesters” broke through the barricades and chant “globalize the intifada” pic.twitter.com/7at76fQSKB

— Ariiiiii (@mommysmaztoball) April 29, 2024

Protesters at GWU have smashed through the barricades and retake U-Yard. pic.twitter.com/ZRoOpfRoFs

— Andrew Leyden (@PenguinSix) April 29, 2024

“I believe that we will win!”

“I believe we will win”

What the students of George Washington University chanted during the pro-Palestine sit-in. pic.twitter.com/aEG3PH5FMr

— stand4justice (@JayZee1948) April 29, 2024

The student newspaper GW Hatchet is posting live reports:

IMAGES FROM THE SCENE: https://t.co/55ShsSZTeW pic.twitter.com/7yrQj0Vbgl

— The GW Hatchet (@gwhatchet) April 29, 2024

Action by police is expected in the morning–or not.

Until then, “Who’s not leaving? We’re not leaving!”

“Whose Not Leaving! We’re Not Leaving!”

Mood. 2am. GWU Campus. #FreePalestine pic.twitter.com/ABvhgENOiS

— #StopCopCity (@ChuckModi1) April 29, 2024

The post Breaking: Rioting Pro-Hamas Students Tear Down Barricades at George Washington University Just Blocks From White House; Palestinian Flag and Keffiyeh Draped on Statue of Nation’s First President appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Giorgia Meloni’s Soft Revolution

Giorgia Meloni’s Soft Revolution

Italy’s prime minister may not cut the most radical figure, but she has shown a way to advance her cause against daunting odds.

Fratelli D’Italia party leader Giorgia Meloni attends a rally for the elections in Piazza Roma on May 30, 2022 in Monza, Italy. (Photo by Alessandro Bremec/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

When Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party won the largest share of the vote in September 2022, the mainstream media were horrified that the far right was on the brink of power; “fascism has returned to Southern Europe” was the general theme of op-eds on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Meloni, with her right-wing coalition that included the fellow populist Matteo Salvini, represented the best opportunity for a true nationalist government in Western Europe. 

Yet, 18 months after her swearing in, populists are left deflated and betrayed by the first female Prime Minister. They expected Meloni to be a wrecking ball to the EU, the European Courts, and Italy’s political establishment; but, rather than destroy the powers that be, she seems to have joined them.

In less than two years, Meloni has forged an alliance with the President of the EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, supported Ukraine in the war against Russia, and never made good on her vow to use the Italian navy to sink migrant boats as they cross the Mediterranean. Her tenure has been marked by a series of disappointments for her international supporters as Italy’s birth rate sinks and immigration climbs, with boats of illegal aliens from Africa continuing to land on the Italian shore. In short, her tenure is viewed as business as usual.

It raises the question of how the most “far-right” politician in Italy became seduced by Europe’s political blob. Or are the skeptics wrong? Is Meloni navigating the course of a soft revolution despite the obstacles that have been laid before her?

Governing, Italian Style

It’s no secret that Italy has one of the most chaotic governments in Europe. 

Since the end of World War II, Italy has had almost 70 governments—more than Germany and the United Kingdom combined. This is in part due to the instability of coalition governments, but also because of the way the nation’s constitution is written and the excessive powers given to the bureaucratic state and officials not directly elected by the people.

For example, Italy’s president, who is not directly elected by the people, has some extraordinary powers. He has the right to call or not call elections; is able to send bills back to parliament for reconsideration; and is given the right to appoint the prime minister and the cabinet. This has led to the president outright rejecting political appointments and democratic elections.

If a president decides to oust the elected prime minister, the constitution allows for technocratic governments, crafted by experts and not elected members of the parties or politicians elected by voters, to control the government during political turmoil. From 1993 to 2021, four technocratic or semi-technocratic governments controlled Italy, including the Monti government from 2011 to 2013, which presided over Italy’s financial crisis and brought Italy further under the influence of Brussels. During most of these governments, Italy’s economy weakened, its industrial capacity shrunk, and international politics became a bigger part of Italy’s domestic policy. 

Domestic politics aside, Italy’s prime minister also has to contend with international organizations. Migration policy has to be in line with the European Convention on Human Rights, its budget must stay in line with EU budgetary rules, and the threat of an unstable coalition can usher in another technocratic government of experts that have little interest in Italian nationalism.

So the day Meloni won her election, the daggers were out for her. The pro-EU President Sergio Mattarella made her guarantee she would not damage Italy’s reputation within the European Union, or she may suffer the same fate as Silvio Belusconi, who was ousted and replaced by a technocratic government. The courts dared her to defy international policy around migrants in the same way that landed Salvini in court. The European Union was ready to sanction Italy if she steered too far off course with the national budget.

Much as Donald Trump faced a deep state set on slowing or stopping his agenda, Meloni walked into office knowing that a wrong move could end her time in office before it began.

Even when choosing her cabinet, Meloni had to receive the blessing of Mattarella. In 2018, when Salvini attempted to appoint the economist Paolo Savona as Finance Minister, Matarella blocked him because Savona wrote a paper about how Italy might go about abandoning the euro. It did not matter that Savona repeatedly said he would make no effort to leave the EU’s currency; he couldn’t earn the president’s support.

So the foreign observers who wondered why Meloni wasn’t acting like a human bulldozer against the EU and the nation’s political establishment failed to realize that she simply couldn’t. Safeguards were put in place everywhere to prevent her from veering too far off course. 

Europe’s Empty Nest

Meloni, however, has seized on Europe’s current weakness. 

When Berlusconi took office the second time from 2001 to 2006 and again from 2008 to 2011, he was considered the only man who could unite the fractured and impoverished nation.

Yet he was in the shadows of other giants on the international scene in Europe. Tony Blair was leading the new Labour revolution in the UK, followed by the Conservative Party’s David Cameron. Angela Merkel of Germany governed her country for 16 years, becoming the most transformational leader on the continent. Even France had Jacques Chirac, who became the most well-known European critic of the Iraq War, and then President Nicolas Sarkozy, who became an influential advocate for regime change in the Middle East. Berlusconi never reached the heights of political influence that his fellow European leaders did, let alone matching other heads of state on the international stage like George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Hu Jinato. 

The Europe of today is a shell of the one Berlusconi knew. The UK is shuffling around prime ministers like a banana republic. Emmanuel Macron has lost his legislative majority and is worried about a rising Marine Le Pen. Olaf Scholz, Germany’s chancellor and a relative unknown to international audiences, has underwater approval ratings. Leaders across the EU are wondering how to stem the growing rise of national populism.

Meloni has met this moment by becoming Europe’s essential leader, gaining influence within Europe that few other Italian leaders have ever enjoyed.

Rather than snubbing von der Leyen or taking Italy out of the Eurozone, a promise she probably could not have kept, she’s developed a working relationship and influence over the President of the EU Commission.

It has been joked that von der Leyen spends more time in Italy than in any other country in Europe, and it’s beginning to show. Meloni positioned herself as an ambassador to the nationalist right, getting Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban to agree to a landmark EU fund for Ukraine in exchange for 10.2 billion euros that had previously been withheld from his country. She also managed to secure a similar payout from the EU for Italy.

She also was pivotal in passing a near decade-long debated EU migration compact that had been opposed by Hungary and Poland; she brokered a deal whereby Germany’s left-wing government agreed to drop pro-NGO language around the rights of migrants. While the bill wasn’t considered satisfactory to many on the New Right, it earned worse condemnation from humanitarian organizations because it reflected Meloni’s efforts to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. 

“After years of negotiations, EU institutions are now shamefully co-signing an agreement that they know will lead to greater human suffering,” said Eve Geddie, Amnesty International’s head of the European institutions office and director of advocacy.

It’s not just EU leaders who have praised Meloni. Her decision to exit Italy from China’s Belt and Road Initiative won large support from American leaders on both sides of the political aisle.

Meloni’s statecraft, far less bombastic than that of other right-wing nationalists, is helping to set the agenda in Europe, rather than just screaming into the wind.

The Long Reformation

The foil to Meloni is her coalition partner and Italy’s former deputy prime minister, Matteo Salvini.

One of Italy’s largest personalities, Salvini’s popularity and meteoric rise was followed by an equally disastrous collapse. His Lega Nord became the largest right-wing party following the 2018 election, in which it earned 17.8 percent of the vote. Salvini formed a coalition government with the left-wing populist Five Star Movement.

His efforts to combat illegal immigration and his theatrical performance on the national stage earned him wide praise from Italians. By August 2019, polls had his party in the high 30s, and he gambled that he could win enough seats in the next election to have an outright majority; he announced a motion of no confidence in the government to trigger a special election. Mattarella, however, refused to call the election, fearing a populist and anti-EU wave across Italy. So the Five Star Movement created a new coalition government with the center-left Democratic Process. 

The political instability caused Salivini’s support to crater, and his voters moved to Meloni and the Brothers of Italy. He has yet to recover. 

While the bombastic Salvini earned wide praise for his effort to stop illegal immigration by refusing to allow NGOs to dock their ships at Italian ports, the gambit did not work, and he was put on trial for his efforts.

Meloni’s nationalism is much quieter and more disciplined. After seeing the number of illegal aliens coming to the Italian shores double from 2022 to 2023, Meloni signed a slew of new crackdown initiatives, including tougher punishments on human smugglers, stricter procedures to grant humanitarian protection, longer waiting periods in detention centers, and more detention centers. 

With the EU’s blessing and von der Leyen’s assistance, Meloni created bilateral agreements with Tunisia, Turkey, and Libya, as well as an agreement with Albania’s government to house illegal aliens coming to Italy. As a result, illegal immigration dropped by 67 percent from 2023 to 2024. 

On legal immigration, however, Meloni has taken a step back from earlier campaign promises by approving 452,000 non-EU foreign workers from 2023 to 2025, increasing the annual number from 136,000 to 165,000. While the New Right sees this as a betrayal, Meloni is in a precarious situation. Italy’s fertility rate fell below replacement rates in 1976 and has been below 1.6 children per woman since 1980, hitting 1.25 in 2021. The low birthrate has started to take a toll. Italy’s population shrunk from 60.79 million in 2014 to 58.94 million in 2022. The nation’s aging population is forcing her hand, and she has acknowledged that turning around Italy’s low birth rates is paramount.

“My mother always used to tell me… you must always remember that you have the opportunity to do whatever you want, but you must never forget that your first aspiration must be to be a mother yourself,” said Senator Lavinia Mennuni of the Brothers of Italy, earning the scorn from centerists and far-left parties. 

Meloni’s government has moved 1 billion euros to encourage increasing birth rates in the forms of financial aid to female workers with at least two children, extending parental leave, and increasing daycare but only for two children families. 

Hungary’s pro-natalist policies has led to a marginal increase in their nation’s fertility rate from 1.23 in 2011 to 1.59 in 2021. Yet all the effort to reverse falling fertility with economic handouts have never been proven to be effective as a religious revival. When Georgia’s Patriarch Ilia II announced in 2007 that he would personally baptize any third-or-higher Orthodox child born to married parents, the fertility rate rose from 1.67 to 2.2 in 2016, and has remained around replacement levels for half a decade.

It’s yet to be seen if Meloni’s financial incentive can do anything to reverse the falling birth rates, or she can force Pope Francis to start doing personal baptisms; yet she recognizes that the stability of the West rests on increasing fertility rates.

Meloni understands Italy’s fragility as it faces declining fertility, illegal immigration, and a government that seeks to deny the will of the people. That is why her most ambitious political effort is rewriting the Italian constitution.

Under her new changes to Italy’s constitution, the party that secures the most votes will receive 55 percent of all seats in Parliament, similar to Greece’s model. It will also allow voters to directly elect the prime minister to a five-year term in order to ensure more political stability and give politicians mandates to move forward with their agenda. 

“We want to take advantage of the stability of this government to give Italians a reform that will allow them to choose who is going to govern them and allow the ones chosen by Italians to have five years to realize their program,” Meloni said in a social media video explaining the reforms.

The reforms would also abolish the president’s ability to form a technocratic government, thus delivering more democratic control to voters. It would also decentralize more power to each of Italy’s individual regions and reduce the bureaucracy of the central government.

The EU’s parliamentary elections are about a month away, and Meloni’s ECR coalition is expected to gain seats, expanding her influence abroad and if her constitutional amendments pass, domestically as well.

Her soft nationalist revolution that seeks to move the needle from within the system is a significant departure from European politics of the past, but, if it succeeds, it will be the model for leaders as the New Right forges its way. Meloni may not be the loudest in the group, but in the end she could be the most important. 

The post Giorgia Meloni’s Soft Revolution appeared first on The American Conservative.

The Only Question That Matters in the Trump Trial

The Only Question That Matters in the Trump Trial

Proving intent will be difficult—but, even if the prosecutors do, it may not matter.

The critical element in the Trump “hush money” trial, and the factor most likely to result in a reasonable doubt, is intent. What did Trump intend by paying Stormy (if indeed he did) to keep quiet about an affair (if indeed they had one)?

For a guilty verdict, the prosecution must prove Trump had an affair with Stormy Daniels, paid her to be quiet about that affair, that the principal purpose of the payment was to influence the outcome of the election, that the payment was made from campaign funds (itself illegal in the amounts paid and lack of disclosure), and that Trump falsified business records with the intent to characterize the payment not as hush money but as legal expenses. Believe it or not, that’s the actual charge here when all the dust is blown away: falsifying business records.

Before we get to the meat of the case—intent—a warm-up point. There is nothing illegal about paying out “hush money” per se. It is called a settlement, and lawyers negotiate them all the time for clients via non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). A person receives a sum of money to not speak about some event, usually as a way to avoid a lengthy and often embarrassing public trial. So the term “hush money” itself is a bit disingenuous.

As for the affair itself, the jury will need to weigh the statements of the only two people on earth who know the truth, Trump and Stormy. If there was nothing to “hush,” there is no case. The jury will also need to weigh whether money was paid to Stormy by Trump. The so-called receipts for the payments are checks signed by Michael Cohen, Don Jr., and the former (and convicted) Trump CFO, but not Trump. It is claimed that the checks were payments to keep Stormy quiet; this is denied by Trump. Cohen said he created fake invoices for legal services to cover up the money.

Further, the money must also have come from campaign funds to end up as being illegal; it cannot have been Trump’s personal money. (Campaign finance laws limit the amount of a personal donation and require disclosure for a candidate’s own money donated to the campaign.) Where did the money come from? Lastly, the prosecution must convince a jury that all of this—alleged events from up to nine years ago that would usually be charged as a misdemeanor—is actually worthy of a felony conviction. The prosecution must find a way, past the hoopla, to prove these points.

But even if the jury can be convinced of the above points—largely on personal claims by a disbarred lawyer and convicted felon and perjurer, Michael Cohen—the case hinges on what Trump’s intent was all along.

Trump may claim he need not discuss intent because there was no underlying affair to begin with. More likely, however, is that at some point he will state (in legalese) something along the lines of this: If some sort of affair took place and if he paid Stormy to be quiet about it, his purpose was only to spare his wife and son further embarrassment. He was simply a cheater.

Besides, with the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape already out there, how much influence could one more affair have on the campaign? Trump’s lawyer has already proposed another sweeping explanation in his opening statement to the court, saying, “There’s nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. It’s called democracy. They put something sinister on this idea as if it were a crime.” 

“You’ll learn it’s not,” he added.

So the problem is—and it is a big one—proving intent. You have to intend to violate campaign finance laws; it’s not just a matter of making a mistake or even just acting like a sleaze. Any illegality comes from the assertion by Michael Cohen about Trump’s intent: that the NDA was not, say, to spare Trump’s marriage from new embarrassment, but “for the principal purpose of influencing an election” amid everyone already knowing Trump was a serial philanderer. If the whole was primarily for the purpose of hiding Stormy from voters instead of hiding Stormy from Trump’s wife and kids, then the money was essentially a campaign contribution, and a new set of laws kick in.

“It should be clear,” said the New York Law Journal, “Cohen’s plea, obtained under pressure and with the ultimate aim of developing a case against the president, cannot in and of itself establish whether Trump had the requisite mental state.”

The prosecution has already begun setting the stage for the jury as to Trump’s intent with its first witness, the National Enquirer’s former publisher, David Pecker. Pecker testified at a meeting he and Trump (and Cohen) discussed how they might “catch and kill” negative stories during the campaign. If someone seemed ready to come forth with something that might hurt Trump, Pecker could “buy” the story from that person with the intent to simply hold on to it and never actually publish anything. That, the prosecution claims in what some lawyers call “storytelling,” will show Trump already had hiding stuff on his mind and worked out a mechanism to hush up a negative story. 

But if that all is so, why wasn’t the same mechanism—the Enquirer route of checkbook journalism—used with Stormy? The jury will need to decide. (FYI, prosecutors gave Pecker and another Enquirer executive immunity from prosecution so that they remain unindicted co-conspirators acting as witnesses.)

What you are likely to hear in the media, and from the prosecution, is that this trial is really about something much bigger than false business records. It is about Trump trying to steal the election, something they’ll claim has plenty of proof of intent behind it (see January 6.)

Never mind all the technicalities of campaign finance law and all the salacious details provided by ex-con disbarred lawyers and porn stars, the argument goes. This is about something we all know to be true, election fraud, the desire by Trump to win at any cost. He was afraid of what effect Stormy might have. He laid out plans with the Enquirer, used with another alleged extra-marital girlfriend, Karen McDougal, to kill bad news. He directed Michael Cohen to pay off Stormy. He had records altered with an intent to conceal the real crime. He created a criminal conspiracy to help manipulate the election. He is guilty of something.

At this early point, we’re already left with the question that nags everything to do with Trump: so what? It has long been established that Trump’s slimy personal life matters little to voters. Trump himself has done a masterful job of setting the stage for all of his trials, labeling them in bulk election interference and an attempt to use “lawfare” to prevent him from even campaigning for the presidency. The “so what” question here is, So what if Trump is found guilty? In whatever form this all shakes out, guilty or not, will it matter on the one day it matters, Election Day 2024?

The post The Only Question That Matters in the Trump Trial appeared first on The American Conservative.

Snow White’s Evil Queen Being Played by Transgender Biological Male at Disney World Resort in Florida (VIDEO)

A transgender biological male is playing Snow White’s Evil Queen at Walt Disney World Resort’s Wilderness Lodge in Florida.

One family who went and filmed the character said they had paid $300 for a meet-and-greet photo opportunity after their themed dinner at Story Book Dining at Artist Point — only to be greeted by what the father referred to as a drag queen.

A family has reached out to That Park Place claiming they spent over $300 on a character meet and greet dinner at Walt Disney World… only to discover the Evil Queen character was almost certainly a biological male. This represents the first time we’ve heard of Disney using a… pic.twitter.com/jHRt64wl4O

— wdwpro (@wdwpro1) April 23, 2024

The father spoke to the Disney news site That Park Place, which broke the news that a man is playing a female character.

The upset parent explained, “While we were waiting for the desserts to come out we received our invitation to meet the Evil Queen which we were really looking forward to. Keep in mind we’ve had other meet and greets with other Villains and they are truly the best character experiences that we’ve ever had so we had high hopes for the Evil Queen leading up.”

“So we all walked over towards the Evil Queen area and while my kids and wife were interacting with the character I was doing some video and took a few pictures from about 10 feet away then handed my iPhone over to the cast member to take some pics for me so I could get in the picture. It was kind of loud inside so I couldn’t really hear what the character was saying until I got face to face (typical conversation distance of a few feet) and then it hit me that the Evil Queen without a doubt had a man’s voice.”

The father explained that when he returned to the table he complained to his waiter about the Evil Queen being a man dressed in drag.

“The waiter immediately said he was going to get a manager and he looked panicked…” the father explained. “At first I said I wanted to formally complain about the Evil Queen being a man and that I felt very disrespected by Disney because this is not the sort of thing my family values and they didn’t give us any type of notice that this sort of thing was even a possibility.”

He explained to the manager that they are a conservative Christian family and are spending $8,000 on the current trip. The manager, however, never once apologized.

“At one point the manager stated ‘I can assure you that she is a woman.’ She went even further, trying to shame me, informing me that ‘she’ was so excited to get the part as the Evil Queen,” the father recalled. “For a brief moment I thought ‘oh… maybe I’m wrong’ but then I realized that I was just being gaslighted. I politely told the manager that ‘I know what you are doing and that I do not appreciate the fact that you are trying to be funny and disingenuous.’ So since the manager doubled down I also doubled down and asked ‘is the Evil Queen a biological male?’ The manager’s reply was, ‘I’m sorry sir, I cannot answer that.’”

It appears that the Evil Queen has been portrayed by a man for at least the last several months, as there are multiple videos featuring him on YouTube.

Last year, Disney faced a similar scandal by allowing men to wear dresses and greet children at Bibbidy Bobbidi Boutique Dress Shop.

The high-priced shop takes children through getting princess-ready, complete with “magic mirrors” and a salon where they can get their hair and makeup done after selecting the perfect princess dress to wear while they visit the theme park.

Makeovers at the boutique are limited to children ages 3 to 12.

In previous years, little girls and their parents were met at the door by one of the “fairy godmothers in training,” usually a young woman who helped them decide on their perfect princess makeover.

Now, they appear to be being met by drag queens.

Disney has men dressed as women, wearing dresses greeting children at some of their attractions.

Received both of these this week from disturbed visitors. pic.twitter.com/c0NGDhRKh3

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 25, 2023

In a video posted to Twitter at the end of May, a mustached man in heavy makeup is seen introducing himself to a child as one of the fairy godmother’s apprentices.

Disney has a man in a dress working in the dress store for little girls at Disneyland. This is who Disney wants girls to see when they first walk in to pick out a dress. pic.twitter.com/Ta2dwyAaSa

— Jason Jones (@jonesville) May 30, 2023

In 2022, Inside the Magic reported, “Boutique Cast Members were formerly called ‘Fairy Godmothers in Training’ but will now be called ‘Fairy Godmother’s Apprentices,’ according to an update on Disneyland Resort and Walt Disney World Resort’s websites.”

The report added, “This change is more gender inclusive and will allow Cast Members who don’t identify as female to participate in magical Bibbidi Bobbidi Boutique makeovers.”

“This is just one of the many ways Disney is trying to push more inclusivity. Recently Disney changed the opening to the fireworks shows as they removed the phrase ‘Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls.’ Disney Cast Members also have a less strict dress code as it, too, has become more gender-inclusive.”

Disney also partnered with TikTok influencer Seann Altman, a biological male who identifies as “gender fluid,” to promote a line of girls’ apparel.

In the video, Altman does a tutorial on dressing like Minnie Mouse.

A new Disney ad features a male (@seannaltman) dressing up in women’s clothes so that he can be like Minnie Mouse. pic.twitter.com/Y0EabqG0W4

— Leftism (@LeftismForU) August 7, 2023

Altman dons a red Minnie Mouse print dress, big red bow, and a white petticoat before putting his hair in two high buns to simulate the children’s character’s ears.

“I literally look like Minnie Mouse!” Altman declares.

@seannaltman “Clara, It’s you! You are the Sugarplum Princess!” – King Eric, Barbie in the Nutcracker (2001) #nutcracker #sugarplumfairy #barbie #balletcore #fantasy ♬ The Nutcracker, Op. 71, Act II: No. 14a, Pas de deux. Andante maestoso – Sir Simon Rattle & Berliner Philharmoniker

The transgender influencer has 717,000 followers on the platform and frequently makes videos where he is dressed up as a young girl, including a recent one where he is skipping around in fairy wings.

The post Snow White’s Evil Queen Being Played by Transgender Biological Male at Disney World Resort in Florida (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.