Here are the 42 Questions Judge Merchan will Ask Potential Jurors For Stormy Daniels ‘Hush Money’ Trial

Far-left New York Judge Juan Merchan late Monday night released his questionnaire for potential jurors in the Stormy Daniels ‘hush money’ trial set to begin April 15.

Trump’s attorneys argued that potential jurors and their political affiliations are important.

Judge Merchan pushed back and said questions about prospective jurors’ political affiliations and whether they like Trump are “irrelevant.”

“Such questions are irrelevant because they do not go to the issue of the prospective juror’s qualifications,” Merchan wrote. “The ultimate issue is whether the prospective juror can ensure us that they will set aside any personal feelings or biases and render a decision that is based on the evidence and the law.”

Because rabid, Trump-hating leftists can ‘set aside’ their personal feelings about Trump and render a fair decision.

Here are the 42 questions Judge Juan Merchan will ask potential jurors:

Page 1:

On Page 2, Judge Merchan asked the potential jurors which cable networks they watch and which blogs they read. Merchan also asked the potential jurors if they listen to any podcasts.

Page 3:

On Page 4 Judge Merchan asked the potential jurors if they have ever attended a Trump rally.

On Page 5, Judge Merchan asked the potential jurors if they follow President Trump on social media. They were also asked if they have ever supported Q Anon, Proud Boys, Antifa, Boogaloo Boys, Three Percenters or Oath Keepers.

Page 6:

Potential jurors were asked if there is any reason that would prevent them from being fair and impartial.

A New York appellate court judge on Tuesday rejected Trump’s 11th-hour bid to delay the Stormy Daniels ‘hush money’ trial which is set to begin April 15.

Tuesday’s ruling comes one day after another New York appeals court judge rejected Trump’s request to delay the trial on a separate argument.

A judge however granted Trump’s request for a review of the gag order imposed by Judge Merchan.

The post Here are the 42 Questions Judge Merchan will Ask Potential Jurors For Stormy Daniels ‘Hush Money’ Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

HORROR: Illegal Alien in Illinois Brutally Stabs Wife to Death in Front of Their Two Children, Nearly Decapitating Her

Baltazar Perez-Estrada
Credit: DuPage County State Attorney

An illegal alien from Mexico who walked across the open U.S.-Mexico border last month committed one of the most heinous crimes imaginable.

As Fox News reported Thursday, 33-year-old Baltazar Perez-Estrada walked into the Carol Stream Police Department in Illinois on April 1 at 11:30 A.M. and informed them that he had stabbed his 26-year-old wife, Maricela Simon Franco, to death.

The incident occurred on March 31 at 10 p.m. when Perez-Estrada and Franco argued. Perez-Estrada was infuriated when he found out his wife had a boyfriend about two weeks after he crossed into the U.S., according to Law and Crime.

Perez-Estrada proceeded to stab Franco dozens of times in her head, neck, body, and hands in front of their two young children. Prosecutors revealed the attack was so brutal that Franco was nearly decapitated.

Franco was pronounced dead at the scene.

Prosecutors also discovered that the violent alien crossed into the United States from Mexico before the murder. But instead of being sent back, Perez-Estrada was just given a notice to appear before a court and allowed him to continue his journey.

DuPage County State’s Attorney Robert Berlin released a statement mourning Simon Franco’s death and expressing condolences to her loved ones.

“First and foremost, I offer my sincerest condolences to Maricela’s surviving family and friends on their loss and wish them strength as they continue their lives without the love and support provided by Maricela,” Berlin said.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene (R-GA) posted a statement on X slamming Joe Biden and disgraced Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for contributing to this evil crime via their open border policies:

Biden is letting monsters in our country. Animal is too nice of a word to describe this man. He’s a monster.

Mayorkas is running the open border that is letting these things in America. When we deliver the articles, Schumer better hold a trial.

Biden is letting monsters in our country. Animal is too nice of a word to describe this man. He’s a monster.

Mayorkas is running the open border that is letting these things in America.

When we deliver the articles, Schumer better hold a trial. https://t.co/qNOIM8QgwU

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) April 5, 2024

Perez-Estrada has been charged with first-degree murder. His arraignment is set for April 25.

The post HORROR: Illegal Alien in Illinois Brutally Stabs Wife to Death in Front of Their Two Children, Nearly Decapitating Her appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Biden Gets Angry When Heckler Interrupts His Speech, Randomly Shouts Out of Nowhere (VIDEO)

Joe Biden on Tuesday delivered remarks on his dumpster fire economy during a campaign event at Union Station in Washington, DC.

As usual, Biden’s speech was full of lies and gaffes.

“Why did I commute every single day? Over a million miles round trip over the time I was in the United States Senate!” Biden said confusing this tall tale with another one he tells about the time he traveled as Vice President.

Biden falsely claimed his “administration has already cut the deficit by $1 trillion!”

This is a lie. Biden’s tax-and-spend policies have added to the deficit.

“Nobody earning less than $400K,000 per year will pay an extra penny in taxes!” Biden said.

This is a lie. Biden has already raised taxes on Americans earning as little as $20,000 per year. Inflation is also a tax that is hurting tens of millions of hardworking Americans.

At one point a heckler interrupted Biden’s speech.

“Well I’ll tell you what…you wanna come make a speech or shush up, okay?” Biden said to the heckler. “I’m not messing around with him! He looks like he could take me!”

VIDEO:

Cognitively impaired Biden gets angry when a heckler interrupts him pic.twitter.com/Dnrix6uZyU

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 9, 2024

Biden started shouting out of nowhere.

“We’re the United States of America! There is nothing beyond our capacity, nothing!” Biden shouted as he coughed in his hand.

So inspiring!

WATCH:

Biden starts yelling as he wraps up his incoherent speech:

“WE’RE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! THERE IS NOTHING BEYOND OUR CAPACITY, NOTHING…”

*violently coughs*

“…IF WE DO IT TOGETHER” pic.twitter.com/ttDsFvuCIk

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 9, 2024

The post Biden Gets Angry When Heckler Interrupts His Speech, Randomly Shouts Out of Nowhere (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

State Investigation Clears Christian School, But Feds Don’t Drop Case

This article originally appeared on WND.com

Guest by post by Bob Unruh 

‘Zero findings. Not a single one. Not one’

It was all over the headlines only months ago when the Joe Biden administration sued Grand Canyon University, the largest Christian school in the nation, as part of what school officials described as a coordinated attack by Biden.

It was the Federal Trade Commission that filed a lawsuit against the school, making allegations that it didn’t reveal how long it would take for doctoral students to finish its accelerated program and marketed itself as a nonprofit.

The Department of Education, earlier claiming misinformation about the doctoral program, announced a fine of $37.7 million against the school.

Now a report from the Georgia Star News confirms that a state investigation has confirmed there’s no proof of any wrongdoing by the school.

So the federal agencies decided to continue their agenda against the Christian organization anyway.

The report revealed a review from the state auditor, through the Arizona State Approving Agency, found that risks identified by Biden’s allegations “could not be substantiated, which means the private nonprofit’s students can still use GI bill funding to pay tuition.”

The report said University President Brian Mueller told KSTAR, “They said, ‘Zero findings. Not a single one. Not one.’”

School spokesman Bob Romantic said in an interview with The College Fix that the audit covered all three allegations charged by the Biden regulators.

But he said the school still is being “targeted” by “systemic attacks … against GCU that we believe are retaliation for filing our lawsuit against the DOE.”

The school sued after the Department of Education brought out a list of its complaints and announced that $37.7 million fine.

Then the FTC sued, claiming telemarketing and marketing violations, concerns that now have been addressed by the state investigation.

Mueller suggested Biden is “maliciously targeting” the school, the report explained.

While the FTC claims the school misrepresented its cost, the report said “a degree calculator function on their website currently states the average number of continuation courses required for past students for each doctoral degree program in clear, red font above the program’s price listings.”

Copyright 2024 WND News Center

The post State Investigation Clears Christian School, But Feds Don’t Drop Case appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Russia’s Top Investigative Body Accuses U.S. Senior Officials and Hunter Biden-Linked Burisma of Terror Attacks

Russia’s highest investigative body announced on Tuesday that it has launched an official criminal probe into senior officials in the United States and other NATO countries who are suspected of financing terrorism acts.

According to The Moscow Times, Russia’s Investigative Committee, which is the primary federal investigating authority of Russia, has accused U.S. Senior officials, NATO members, and the Hunter Biden-linked Bursima Holdings of financing terror attacks that have occurred both inside and outside of Russia.

The statement was made in a video released by the Committee but did not refer to a specific terror attack.

The Investigative Committee’s probe comes just a month after 144 people were killed in a terrorist attack at the Crocus City Hall in Krasnogorsk, Russia last month.

In a video, the Investigative Committee shared that money from commercial organizations has been used in Russia to “eliminate prominent political and public figures.”

The Investigative Committee then singled out Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings for being one of the organizations that have allegedly financed terrorism.

WATCH:

Big news via ⁦@IntelRepublic⁩! MOSCOW OPENS CRIMINAL CASE ON TERRORISM-FINANCING BY U.S. & NATO OFFICIALS following Crocus bloodbath – Investigation finds funds funneled through Hunter Biden-linked Ukrainian Burisma Holdings gas company, used for terrorist attacks in Russia pic.twitter.com/1an7ivfn3h

— Dan Kovalik (@danielmkovalik) April 9, 2024

Per The Moscow Times:

Russia’s top investigative body announced Tuesday that it has launched a criminal probe into senior officials in the United States and NATO member countries who are suspected of “financing terrorism.”

Russia’s Investigative Committee, which probes major crimes, said it has “established” that money from commercial organizations had been used to “eliminate prominent political and public figures” inside and outside Russia in recent years, as well as to “inflict economic damage” against the country.

While the Investigative Committee did not specify which terrorist attacks it suspects were funded by Western organizations, the announcement comes as top Russian officials double down on claims that Ukraine and the West were involved in the deadly Crocus City Hall attack last month.

The top law enforcement body named the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings as one of the implicated organizations. U.S. President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden served as a member of Burisma’s board of directors between 2014 and 2019.

This isn’t the first time Burisma Holdings has been accused of financing terrorism.

Richard Abelson of the Gateway Pundit previously reported that Ukrainian court documents from April of 2022 reveal Burisma was linked to a $5,950,000 payment sent to the Ukrainian foreign intel service GUR.

GUR chief General Kirill Budanov has previously claimed responsibility for assassinating high-profile  Russians.

READ:

Hunter Biden’s Burisma Suspected of Funding Terrorist Killings in Russia

The post Russia’s Top Investigative Body Accuses U.S. Senior Officials and Hunter Biden-Linked Burisma of Terror Attacks appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

JUST IN: Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s 11th-Hour Request to Delay Stormy Daniels ‘Hush Payment’ Trial

A New York appellate court judge on Tuesday rejected Trump’s 11th-hour bid to delay the Stormy Daniels ‘hush money’ trial which is set to begin April 15.

Tuesday’s ruling comes one day after another New York appeals court judge rejected Trump’s request to delay the trial on a separate argument.

A ruling on Trump’s request to stay Judge Juan Merchan’s gag order is still pending.

CNBC reported:

A state appeals court judge on Tuesday denied Donald Trump’s bid to halt his criminal trial while he appeals his gag order in the case, a ruling that came less than 24 hours after another judge rejected the former president’s request to delay his impending criminal trial on other grounds.

Tuesday’s ruling came roughly one hour after Trump attorney Emil Bove argued his client is entitled to a stay of the proceedings while he challenges the “unconstitutional” partial gag order Judge Juan Merchan handed down against Trump last month and expanded days later.

Bove contended the gag order — which prohibits Trump from bashing witnesses, individual prosecutors, court staff and their relatives, the judge’s relatives and jurors and potential jurors — means his client can’t comment on publicly filed motions and that it violates the former president’s Sixth and First Amendment rights.

His court filing contended the order is causing “ongoing, irreparable harm to Petitioner and the voting public.”

President Trump on Monday sued Juan Merchan, the far-left judge overseeing the Stormy Daniels ‘hush payment’ trial.

The lawsuit is currently under seal, but the court docket reveals Trump requested a change of venue and asked for a stay on the expanded gag order.

The appellate judge did not address Trump’s request for a change of venue or his request to stay the gag order.

The gag order motion will come on Tuesday.

The post JUST IN: Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s 11th-Hour Request to Delay Stormy Daniels ‘Hush Payment’ Trial appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

FRAUDULENT Fani: Gets Threatened with PERJURY Charges, Asked to RECUSE Herself | Beyond the Headlines

Fani Willis has once again been thrown into the spotlight — this time by Harrison Floyd, one of the defendants in the lawfare of the RICO case Willis has opened up against Trump. We already have concrete evidence Fani LIED in her testimony, is it time she RECUSES herself in the case?

Elijah Schaffer discusses all this and MORE on today’s episode of Beyond the Headlines!

The post FRAUDULENT Fani: Gets Threatened with PERJURY Charges, Asked to RECUSE Herself | Beyond the Headlines appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Arizona Supreme Court Revives 160-Year-Old Law, Bans Most Abortion Except to Save a Woman’s Life

The Arizona Supreme Court has reinstated a pre-statehood abortion law from 1864, effectively outlawing the procedure except in instances where it is necessary to save the life of the mother.

It can be recalled that Katie Hobbs signed a new Executive Order Friday that will delegate abortion-related prosecution to Attorney General Kris Mayes, who previously vowed not to enforce any current Arizona abortion laws if she is elected.

It will also restrict state agencies from assisting in other state investigations, ban extraditions of doctors wanted in other states, and establish a council to expand access to abortion.

The Gateway Pundit reported in September 2022 that a judge ruled that Arizona could enforce its ban on abortion following the Supreme Court’s ruling on Roe v. Wade. This law made abortion legal if the mother’s life was at risk.

Doctors who perform abortions on a healthy woman would be “punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two years nor more than five years” under the pre-Roe law. However, The Arizona Court of Appeals later overturned this ruling and ruled that Arizona could impose a more recent law banning abortion after 15 weeks.

Katie Hobbs and Kris Mayes are pro-abortion, pro-infanticide radicals.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Hobbs vetoed Senator Janae Shamp’s SB1600, which would require doctors to care for an infant that is born alive and entitle them to be treated as a legal person under Arizona law.

As a legislator, Hobbs voted against similar legislation requiring doctors to maintain a baby’s life if they survive an abortion. Further, she voted against abortion limitations every chance she was given as a State Legislator.

Katie Hobbs and Kris Mayes are pro-abortion, pro-infanticide radicals.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Hobbs vetoed Senator Janae Shamp’s SB1600, which would require doctors to care for an infant that is born alive and entitle them to be treated as a legal person under Arizona law.

As a legislator, Hobbs voted against similar legislation requiring doctors to maintain a baby’s life if they survive an abortion. Further, she voted against abortion limitations every chance she was given as a State Legislator.

The appeal’s court decision from December 2022, which had previously protected doctors from being prosecuted under the pre-statehood abortion ban, was overturned by the state’s highest court. The historic 1864 statute will become active once again 14 days following the ruling.

In a 4-2 split decision, Justice John R. Lopez IV clarified that the Arizona law permitting abortions up to the 15th week of pregnancy was contingent on the federal constitutional right to abortion.

This right was abolished by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization two years prior. Without this federal right, the 1864 law revives and stands as the governing statute.

Justice Lopez indicated that the 15-week law does not independently authorize abortions, and because there is no current federal or state law counteracting the 1864 statute, it is now enforceable. This decision effectively makes the performance of an abortion illegal in every case except to save a woman’s life.

Justice Lopez indicated that the 15-week law does not independently authorize abortions, and because there is no current federal or state law counteracting the 1864 statute, it is now enforceable. This decision effectively makes the performance of an abortion illegal in every case except to save a woman’s life.

AZ Central reported:

The decision was 4-2, with Justices John R. Lopez IV, Clint Bolick, James P. Beene and Kathryn H. King in the majority. Lopez wrote the majority opinion, while Vice Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer penned a dissent. Chief Justice Robert M. Brutinel joined Timmer.

“Physicians are now on notice that all abortions, except those necessary to save a woman’s life, are illegal … and that additional criminal and regulatory sanctions may apply to abortions performed after fifteen weeks’ gestation,” the ruling reads.

The majority ruled that a law passed in 2022, which prohibited abortions after 15 weeks, did not repeal the pre-statehood law nor create a right to abortion. The justices said the 2022 law was enacted by the Legislature because the prior law was at the time enjoined in court.

“Life is a human right, and today’s decision allows the state to respect that right and fully protect life again—just as the legislature intended,” said Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Jake Warner, who argued the case before the court in favor of the pre-statehood ban.

One immediate effect of the ruling could be more support for a potential ballot measure in the works for this year. Advocates say they’ve already got more than 500,000 signatures, well above the threshold of 383,923 signatures needed by an early July deadline.

The post Arizona Supreme Court Revives 160-Year-Old Law, Bans Most Abortion Except to Save a Woman’s Life appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

EXCLUSIVE: Former AG John Ashcroft and Constitutional Coalition File Brief with US Supreme Court on Presidential Immunity

Credit: The Gateway Pundit Photo

The Constitutional Coalition and former Attorney General John Ashcroft filed an amicus curiae (Friend of the Court) in the United States Supreme Court in the case United States v. Trump.  The appeal to the Supreme Court concerns the question of presidential immunity. More specifically, whether a subsequent president may criminally prosecute his (or her) predecessor, and current political rival, for official acts the previous president took while in office.  This amicus brief was not filed on behalf of either party – Special Counsel Jack Smith (hired by Attorney General Merrick Garland to prosecute former President Trump) nor on behalf of former President Trump.  Rather, this amicus brief was filed to defend the constitutional principle that a President of the United States, as the Nation’s chief executive, must have immunity from criminal prosecution for those official acts the President takes during the President’s term in office.  Otherwise, the President’s fear of a subsequent political rival bringing a criminal prosecution after the President leaves office will impair the President’s ability to make those decisions necessary to protect our national interest and discharge the duties of the office of Chief Executive.

This does not mean the President is “above the law” or is unaccountable.  Quite to the contrary.  The Founders adopted a very specific method for holding the President accountable.  That method is in Article One of the Impeachment Clause of the Constitution, which provides that, after impeached by the House and conviction by the Senate, the President may be subject to criminal prosecution.  The Constitutional principle at issue in United States v. Trump transcends Donald J. Trump individual and the immediate passions surrounding the 2024 Presidential Election.  How the Supreme Court decides this case could shift the balance in the Separation of Powers between the three branches of our government.  And, how the Supreme Court decides this constitutional issue will determine how future presidents fulfill their duty to act as the Nation’s Chief Executive.

The amicus brief former Attorney General Ashcroft and the Constitutional Coalition filed provides a historical context to this appeal that will assist the Supreme Court in answering this question. It is. not hyperbole to suggest that United States v. Trump is of a constitutional magnitude equivalent to Chief Justice John Marshall’s decision for the Court in Marbury v. Madison.

The post EXCLUSIVE: Former AG John Ashcroft and Constitutional Coalition File Brief with US Supreme Court on Presidential Immunity appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Illegal Alien From El Salvador Arrested For Murdering Man, Dismembering His Body

Joe Biden’s America.

An illegal alien from El Salvador was arrested last Friday in California for murdering a man and dismembering his body in January.

Police did not identify the suspect because he was 17 at the time of the murder. He turned 18 in February, but law enforcement is still protecting his identity.

“On Friday, April 5th, homicide detectives with the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office arrested an 18 year old from Mendota,” the Fresno County Sheriff said.

“He has been booked into the Fresno County Juvenile Justice Campus and faces one count of murder. His name is not being released due to him currently being in the juvenile court system. The court has the discretion to transfer this matter to an adult court. That decision will be made at a later time,” the sheriff said.

“On January 17th, 2024, deputies responded to check on a car parked in the middle of an orchard located near Belmont and Washoe Avenues, just west of Mendota. Inside the vehicle was a deceased man whose body had been dismembered. He was later identified as 25 year old Fraylee Hernandez of Mendota,” the Fresno sheriff added.

The suspect is an illegal alien from El Salvador who is on probation for assaulting his mother. It is unclear when or where he illegally entered the US.

The victim, Fraylee Hernandez, and the suspect were acquaintances according to law enforcement.

“During the investigation, detectives identified a primary suspect in this murder. They learned the actual killing took place on January 6th, 2024. At the time, the suspect was 17 years old. He turned 18 in February. The suspect is an undocumented immigrant from El Salvador who is also currently on probation for assaulting his mother. He and the murder victim were acquaintances,” the sheriff said.

MIGRANT CRIME: An 18-year-old illegal alien from El Salvador has been arrested in California for murdering a man and dismembering his body. pic.twitter.com/qhfAkljZjo

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 9, 2024

The post Illegal Alien From El Salvador Arrested For Murdering Man, Dismembering His Body appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.