Month: April 2024

An unidentified man carries a sign echoing the Nazi plan to eradicate Jews. Image: @zach_kessel/X

An unidentified anti-Israel protester was photographed at George Washington University (GWU) with a sign calling for the “final solution,” echoing the Nazi plan to exterminate all Jews.

The man was seen carrying a large Palestinian flag with a sign using the verbiage of Adolf Hitler to describe his plans for the “annihilation of the Jews” as anti-Israel protesters on Thursday occupied GWU’s campus.

Image: @zach_kessel/X

Sent from @GWtweets: a man at the encampment carrying a sign that says “Final Solution” pic.twitter.com/XTyaamsN4D

— Zach Kessel (@zach_kessel) April 25, 2024

The New York Post reports:

The school said Friday that the remaining protesters “and any who attempt to join them are trespassing on private property and violating university regulations.”

“We are aware that individuals who are not GW students have joined the protest, and we have taken steps to restrict access to University Yard,” said the uni.

“We continue to work with the [Metropolitan Police Department] to ensure the safety and security of our campus.

“We are aware that individuals who are not GW students have joined the protest, and we have taken steps to restrict access to University Yard.

“We will pursue disciplinary actions against the GW students involved in these unauthorized demonstrations that continue to disrupt university operations.”, which is working with police said.”

Princeton: Hezbollah terror flags

George Washington: “final solution”

Ilhan Omar & AOC: “but these are peaceful protests” pic.twitter.com/BjGUTUFr3G

— StopAntisemitism (@StopAntisemites) April 26, 2024

NGO Monitor provides extensive research on the NGO network that is orchestrating the antisemitic incitement on American college campuses.

In the wake of October 7, the exponential rise in antisemitic violence, incitement, intimidation, and harassment on and around campuses in the United States is not the product of spontaneous protests of individuals. Rather, they are tightly coordinated and well-funded by a network of radical and often antisemitic non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), Within Our Lifetime, US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, and Samidoun. Under the guise of human rights and justice, these NGOs work to undermine the economic, military and other ties between US and Israel, and to besiege and divide the US Jewish community.

All of these groups have supported and justified the October 7th massacre, as well as other attacks. Many of the NGOs in the network are directly linked to designated Palestinian terror organizations.

Read their extensive analysis here.

The post George Washington University Anti-Israel Protestor Carries Sign Calling for “Final Solution” Against Jews appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Earlier this week, 11 Presidential electors in Arizona from the 2020 Election were indicted after a grand jury.  The Gateway Pundit reported on this weaponization of the “attorney general” in Arizona.  This is in addition to the criminal cases being brought in Georgia and Michigan, but also the lesser-known criminal and civil cases in Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and a settlement in Wisconsin. 

It is worth noting that while it seems easy to bring charges against these electors, it was infinitely more difficult to litigate the election claims themselves.  Most cases were dismissed on procedural grounds rather than merit.  See a list of lawsuits and their outcomes here.

Kris Mayes “won” the Attorney General race against Republican Abe Hamadeh by 280 votes, despite a major discrepancy in Maricopa County that disproportionately impacted predominantly Republican precincts when the Ballot-On-Demand printers printed 19″ ballots on 20″ paper.  This caused massive delays as voters tried to feed ballots through the tabulators over and over as the machines rejected them.  In addition to voters being forced to place their ballots in “Door #3” to (hopefully) be properly counted later in the evening, lines also began to wrap around buildings and parking lots filled up as delays began to surpass an hour to cast a ballot.  Many voters attested that they had to leave because they had other obligations and couldn’t wait in an hours-long line to vote.

Just In,

Katie Hobbs on behalf of the 2022 Maricopa County General Election recommends adjudicating the 2023 South Carolina Primary,

Just drop it to box 3 or slide it into a trash can, pic.twitter.com/2cDYRSuPl7

— RealRobert (@Real_RobN) February 24, 2024

Here is the problem w/ what happened in Maricopa County on Election Day. This is Anthem, north of Phoenix at about 1:15 pm. Ruby red district of about 30K people. Only one polling location. Ballot tabulators not working in the morning. 2 hr wait to vote midday and still at 6 pm. pic.twitter.com/CY35yQWwq5

— Randy DeSoto (@RandyDeSoto) November 14, 2022

 

In July 2023, The Gateway Pundit published an article about lawfare being used against the alternate electors in the states with contested elections, specifically Georgia, as those electors were the ones being indicted at the time.  The article originally was to focus around the declaration of Professor Todd Zywicki, the George Mason Foundation Professor of Law at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University.  Zywicki is a well-accomplished legal scholar with several published academic papers specifically on laws governing presidential elections and transitions.

However, there were at least two articles from Mockingbird Media outlets that reinforced the position Professor Zywicki was taking regarding sending an alternate slate of electors in a contested election.  One was from CNN, before the days-long counting process ensued and Biden ‘prevailed’.  Around the same time we all went to bed on November 3rd with President Trump in a commanding lead in Pennsylvania (Trump up by 600,000 votes, or 11 points), Georgia (Trump up by 117,000 votes), and Michigan (Trump up by 6 points in Michigan at 4:50am, according to NPR).

In a November 4th, 2020 article, CNN’s Van Jones and Lawrences Lessig tried to show that Biden “still has a path to victory” and stated that:

The key – and this is the critical fact for 2020 as well  –  is that the Democratic slate [of electors] had also met on December 19 [1960], and had also cast their ballots in the manner specified by the Constitution. When they voted, no one knew whether their votes would matter. But at least someone recognized that the only way their votes could matter was if they were cast on the day that Congress had set.

The other outlet, Politico, was a little more researched in their reporting.  The 2022 article titled “See the 1960 Electoral College Certificates That the False Trump Electors Say Justify Their Gambit” claims that the difference between 1960 Hawaii alternate electors and the 2020 alternates was that election challenges in Hawaii 1960 were successful:

“Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next.  Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.“

I guess ‘criminality’ is ‘outcome-determinative’.

However, this is where it gets interesting.  Politico went on to write:

One crucial feature of the 1960 episode is that a state court weighed in on Jan. 4, 1961, two days before Nixon (then vice-president) oversaw the electoral vote count.

In that case, Judge Ronald Jamieson agreed that the certified Kennedy electors were legitimate. But, more significantly, Jamieson said it was important that those electors met and gathered on Dec. 19, 1960, as prescribed by the Electoral Count Act.

Rather than suggest the Democratic electors committed fraud, the judge pointed to their meeting as a key step that preserved their ability to be counted after the recount showed Kennedy had actually won the state.

The highlighted portions would unequivocally suggest that President Trump’s electors were justified in their actions based on past precedent.  However, those highlighted portions no longer exist in the current form of the Politico article that can be found here.  But the internet is forever and those quotes remain on the Wayback Machine archives that can be found here.

Sometime in the month following The Gateway Pundit publishing this piece that cited the above quote specifically, as well as Professor Zywicki’s expert declaration, Politico edited their article to remove (or edit) the highlighted segments.

At the bottom of the article, they write:

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story incorrectly indicated that Jamieson acknowledged the unofficial slate of Democratic electors when he ruled that Kennedy had prevailed in the recount. He made no mention of the “contingent” slate in his ruling or judgment. The story also gave the incorrect date of Jamieson’s ruling. It was Dec. 30, 1960.

The author, Kyle Cheney, wrote on X:

Updating the story was also an opportunity to add a whole range of new primary source documents from 1960 that we obtained from NARA. They include Hawaii judge, Ronald Jamieson’s actual ruling and findings.

And then posted this screenshot, purportedly of the judgement from Judge Ronald B. Jamieson:

 

Politico also removed the last sentence The Gateway Pundit cited (“Rather than suggest the Democratic electors committed fraud…”) despite a strikingly similar citation being made in the Atlanta Journal Constitution and credited to Holly Pierson, counsel for defendant David Shafer and others:

“Rather than suggest the uncertified Democratic electors had committed crimes, Judge Jamieson hailed them as heroes, describing their meeting as a critically important step that preserved their ability for their presidential ballots to be counted after the Democrats prevailed in their election contest and the Governor certified the Democratic contingent presidential electors as having been elected,” Pierson and Gillen said.

The above-referenced quote comes from a letter that was sent to Fulton County DA Fani Willis’s office on March 26th, 2023 from Holly Pierson, counsel for David Shafer.  In the letter, in a footnote on page 4, it states:

In so holding, Judge Ronald Jamieson specifically noted that it was important that the uncertified Democrat presidential electors had met on Dec. 19, 1960, as prescribed by the Electoral Count Act, to cast their ballots. Rather than suggest the uncertified Democratic electors had committed crimes, Judge Jamieson hailed them as heroes, describing their meeting as a critically important step that preserved their ability for their presidential ballots to be counted after the Democrats prevailed in their election contest and the Governor certified the Democratic contingent presidential electors as having been elected.

We’ve reached out to Pierson as well as Professor Zywicki for more information regarding the footnote from the letter to DA Willis.

Either way, the declaration (below) from Prof. Zywicki in and of itself is a thorough explanation to the necessity of sending alternate electors in a contested election, especially electors that claim they are alternates, as was done in 2020.  He also points out that Democrats did the same thing on December 14th, 2020 in the contested Presidential Election of Bush v. Gore.

Zywicki Declaration by CannCon

 

 

The post POLITICO and CNN Previously Justified ‘False Electors’ Using Hawaii’s 1960 Precedent – Politico Edited That Part Out Six Months Later, After TGP Cited It appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Tucker Carlson recently spoke with Justin Haskins, a senior fellow at the Heartland Institute, to discuss the findings from a recent poll showing that one in five voters admitted to breaking the law regarding voting practices in the 2020 election.

As the famous Kari Lake song goes, “81 million votes, my ass!”

As The Gateway Pundit’s Brian Lupo previously reported, the poll conducted by The Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports “found one in five voters who cast mail-in ballots during the 2020 presidential election admit to participating in at least one kind of voter fraud.”

Keep in mind that 43% of 2020 voters cast ballots by mail. There were approximately 155M ballots cast in the 2020 Presidential Election. 43% of that would mean over 66M voted by mail.

The poll consisted of 1,085 likely voters. Republicans made up 33% of those polled, while 36% and 31% were Democrats and “other,” respectively. When broken down by age, 32% were 18-39, 46% were 40-64, and 22% were 65 or older:

SHOCKING: New Poll Finds ONE IN FIVE Voters Who Voted by Mail-in Ballots Admitted to Committing Fraud in 2020 Election

“One in five” of 66M would amount to potentially over 13.33M ballots that were illegally cast. But 2020 was “the safest and most secure election in history.”

Additionally, The Gateway Pundit reported on the phony mail-in ballot signatures on 2022 ballots after receiving access to likely fraudulent 2022 ballot envelopes and historical signatures through a legal public records request. See the obviously fake signatures here.

According to the results of the poll:

17% of mail-in voters admit that in 2020 they voted in a state where they are “no longer a permanent resident”
21% of mail-in voters admitted that they filled out a ballot for a friend or family member
17% of mail-in voters said they signed a ballot for a friend or family member “with or without his or her permission”
8% of likely voters say they were offered “pay” or a “reward” for voting in 2020.
10% of respondents – not just those who voted by mail – claimed that they know “a friend, family member, co-worker, or other acquaintance who has admitted…that he or she cast a mail-in ballot in 2020 in a state other than his or her state of permanent residence.”

“About one in five mail-in ballots in the last election was fraudulent, handing Biden the presidency. We know this because the people who committed the fraud have admitted it in a new poll,” said Tucker in the caption of his latest episode.

Watch below:

Tucker: It’s now apparently a criminal offense, a felony in this country, to suggest the 2020 presidential campaign was not on the level. That crime appears to form the basis of one of Donald Trump’s pending indictments. But actually, it’s worth denying the legitimacy of that election because it was not fair. Critical information was withheld from voters through censorship and yes by the government. That is a fact. It’s also a fact that Mark Zuckerberg spent $400 million to control voting in various places around the country and affect the outcome. That’s not legitimate. It was also conducted in many places through electronic voting machines, and no country should ever use electronic voting machines because, fundamentally, they cannot be trusted. Why would you trust them? But then there’s the question of outright cheating, voter fraud. Was there voter fraud? Well, we know there was some, but was it widespread? That is a hard allegation to prove, though, of course, many people believe there was widespread fraud. Well, now it turns out we know for a fact that there was, and in fact, it can be proven with a poll. Just ask people, did you personally commit voter fraud? Well, that has just been done. And the answer is a huge percentage of people asked in the poll admitted, “yes. I committed voter fraud.” It’s remarkable. Justin Haskins is a senior fellow at the Heartland Institute. He joins us now with details. Justin, thanks so much for coming on. If you could just start by giving us the results, the shocking results of this poll, and we’ll go from there.

Haskins: It was pretty straightforward. We asked people a series of questions. The first of which is or one of the first questions was, did you vote in the 2020 election? And did you vote with an absentee ballot? And if they answered yes to both of those questions, then we asked a bunch of questions related to voter fraud. We didn’t tell them that we were asking did you commit voter fraud. We just asked them about various behaviors. So, for example, we asked people, did you vote in a state where you’re no longer a legal resident? That’s a pretty straightforward question. If you’re not a permanent resident of a state, you can’t vote there. 17% of people, nearly one in five, said yes, they did do that. We asked people, did you fill out a ballot for someone else on their behalf? That’s also illegal. You’re not allowed to fill out someone else’s ballot. 21% of people said yes to that question. We asked if people forged the signature of a friend or family member on their behalf with or without their permission. We actually put that in the poll question. And 17% of people said yes to that. So, all told, it’s at least, and I say at least, one in five mail-in ballots involve some kind of fraudulent activity, but we didn’t just stop there. We also asked everyone whether they voted via mail-in ballot or not, so in-person voting as well, do you know anyone who personally, in your personal life, a friend, a family member, an acquaintance, or someone from work, has anyone ever admitted to you that they did one of these kinds of forms of voter fraud and 10% and 11% — e asked two different questions on that — said yes, people admitted to me that they committed voter fraud.

About one in five mail-in ballots in the last election was fraudulent, handing Biden the presidency. We know this because the people who committed the fraud have admitted it in a new poll. pic.twitter.com/fxHL9hT4sw

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) April 26, 2024

The post WATCH: Tucker Carlson Discusses Poll Finding ONE IN FIVE Voters Who Voted by Mail-in Ballots Admitted to Committing Fraud in 2020 With Heartland Institute’s Justin Haskins appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

This article originally appeared on WND.com

Guest by post by Bob Unruh 

‘They simply want to be part of current protest movements’

There are hundreds, no thousands, of university-age students participating now in the anti-Israel protests on campuses across the nation.

Most of them have little idea of the reason for their protests, according to longtime liberal lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

He said they’re “useful idiots” to those who have a more nefarious motive behind the protests and the violence.

But the threat is that they are being groomed for future terrorists.

Dershowitz, the Felix Frankfurther Professor of Law, emeritus at Harvard, wrote in a column at the Gatestone Institute, where he is a fellow, that those protesters include university, high school and even middle school students.

They are protesting Israel, the U.S., and Jews.

“Some of the signs say ‘pro-Palestine,’ ‘ceasefire now’ and ‘end the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.’ But these benign statements hide a far more malignant agenda, the end of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, the end of America as the world’s leading power and the end of democracy and the free market economy. Even if there were a unilateral ceasefire, accompanied by massive humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza, many of these protests would continue, because Gaza is merely an excuse for a much wider agenda: to destroy Israel and destroy America,” he warned.

New York protesters, he pointed out, recently called to repeat the atrocities of Hamas’ attack on Israeli civilians on Oct. 7, “a thousand times.”

“There were shouts of ‘We are Hamas,’ ‘Death to America,’ ‘Burn Tel Aviv to the ground,’ ‘Israel go to hell’ and ‘Jews to back to Poland.’ The chant of ‘from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ is pervasive. Free of what? Free of Jews,” he said.

Nobody, he said, has been caught with a sign calling for a two-state peace solution.

The calls for “revolution” actually bypass the Middle East issues and aim directly at America, he said.

“As in the 1960s, many of these students are being groomed to be the terrorists of the future – in the manner of Kathy Boudin and Bernardine Dohrn back then – and, in the United States, a fifth column, the aim of which is taking down America,” he said.

The are four players in the protests: Arabs and Muslims who hate Israel and Jews, “old line radicals,” anarchists and America-haters, organizers who handle money and organize violence, and then those “useful idiots.”

They have “little or no knowledge of the substantive issues. They simply want to be part of current protest movements, which are popular on campuses and among many of their peers. It is this last group that is most troubling, because many of its members are good and decent people who are being led into dangerous territory by their elders.”

He said, “That these useful idiots are young does not make them less dangerous. Young students were instrumental in bringing to power tyrants such as Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Pol Pot and Mao.”

He conceded that because they’re young, they still can change ideologies. But he said consequences should accrue to those who are violent.

Those should include “arrest and prosecution – for physically intimidating, blocking and harassing Jews or any minorities. Such actions are not protected by the First Amendment, university disciplinary rules, or employers after graduation.”

Copyright 2024 WND News Center

The post Dershowitz Warns the ‘Useful Idiots’ Now Protesting are Being Groomed for Terrorism appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Another Joe Biden foreign policy disaster is in the works.

Joe Biden already turned over the Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan to Taliban terrorists in September 2021.

Biden abandoned Afghanistan’s Bagram Airfield after nearly 20 years in July by shutting off the electricity and slipping away in the night without notifying the base’s Afghan commander, who discovered the Americans’ secret departure more than two hours after they left.

The Taliban quickly took control of Bagram Air Base, which is only 30 miles north of Kabul, on August 15th and released thousands of terrorists held at its prison. The Americans and Afghans left the Taliban military equipment, uniforms, rations and even sports drinks.

The ISIS suicide bomber who murdered 13 US servicemen and women and 169 Afghans was released by the Taliban from the Bagram Base prison in July.

ISIS suicide bomber Abdul Rehman was incarcerated at the Bagram prison for the past four years until he was set free by the Taliban terrorists.

Abdul Rehman then murdered 13 Americans and 173 Afghans in a suicide bombing outside the Kabul Airport.

Last week we learned about Joe Biden’s latest foreign policy disaster.  The situation in Niger could top the Afghanistan withdrawal – if that is possible.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) totally embarrassed the US Army Secretary and exposed Joe Biden’s latest foreign policy catastrophe during questioning this week in the US House of Representatives’ Armed Services Committee hearing.

Gaetz exposed the latest Biden foreign policy failure – this time in Niger, Africa.

US troops are trapped in the country allegedly without water and medicine. The Army was likely hiding this to protect itself from embarrassment. Deployed Americans are in limbo and unable to do their jobs and the Biden State Department is completely outmaneuvered once again.

Matt Gaetz Embarrasses Army Secretary – Exposes Biden Regime’s Cover-Up in Niger! – Embassy Silent on the Hundreds of US Troops Stuck in Niger Reportedly without Medicine and Water

Secretary Wormuth and General Randy George testified before the House Armed Services Committee on April 16th.

Matt Gaetz posted the report on his congressional webpage.

US Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, a potential DEI hire, was stunned and speechless when Matt Gaetz confronted her about the trapped US soldiers in Niger a country in tremendous turmoil.

It now appears the US has a trade offer from the military junta in Niger.  The Russian-backed military junta in Niger will release the 1,000 US soldiers trapped at the base in exchange for the keys to the $100 million  American airbase in the country.

WAR: Niger’s Russian-backed military junta has agreed to release 1,000 US troops it was effectively holding hostage in exchange for Biden’s agreement to turn over our $100M airbase to Niger and Russian forces. The US media will barely mention this humiliation today. pic.twitter.com/UpmnsMMI2g

— @amuse (@amuse) April 21, 2024

How is it possible that the Biden regime could be so inept?

How is it possible that the US military could be so incompetent?

Should Americans expect more from our Billion dollar investment into the military industrial complex?

Now Chad is forcing a majority of US troops out of the country.

JUST IN: US military forced to withdraw troops from Chad, NYT reports.

“The departure of US military personnel in Chad and Niger comes as both countries are turning away from years of cooperation with the United States and forming partnerships with Russia.” pic.twitter.com/3AmNU9S3pa

— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) April 25, 2024

The Biden-Obama regime is destroying US credibility around the world.

This report is unbelievable. The US is no longer respected under Joe Biden.
The AP reported:

The United States will pull the majority of its troops from Chad and Niger as it works to restore key agreements governing what role there might be there for the American military and its counterterrorism operations, the Pentagon said Thursday.

Both African countries have been integral to the U.S. military’s efforts to counter violent extremist organizations across the Sahel region, but Niger’s ruling junta ended an agreement last month that allows U.S. troops to operate in the West African country. In recent days, neighboring Chad also has questioned whether an existing agreement covered the U.S. troops operating there.

The U.S. will relocate most of the approximately 100 forces it has deployed in Chad for now, Pentagon press secretary Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said Thursday at a press briefing.

“As talks continue with Chadian officials, U.S. AFRICOM is currently planning to reposition some U.S. military forces from Chad, some portions of which were already scheduled to depart. This is a temporary step as part of the ongoing review of our security cooperation, which will resume after Chad’s May 6th presidential election,” Ryder said.

In Niger, the majority of the 1,000 U.S. personnel assigned there also are expected to depart, Ryder said.

U.S. and Nigerien officials were expected to meet Thursday in Niger’s capital, Niamey, “to initiate discussions on an orderly and responsible withdrawal of U.S. forces,” the State Department said in a statement late Wednesday. Follow-up meetings between senior Pentagon and Niger officials are expected next week “to coordinate the withdrawal process in a transparent manner and with mutual respect,” Ryder said.

Interesting information from the African reporter on RT.

The American Exodus: US withdraws troops from Chad

Follow us on Rumble: https://t.co/Nuc9nUzlmx pic.twitter.com/zSYrTHnq9n

— RT (@RT_com) April 27, 2024

The post Another Biden Disaster: US Troops Now Being Forced Out of Chad – As a Majority of Troops are Being Forced Out of Neighboring Niger – Abandoning a $100 Million Airbase appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

As the winds of change sweep through the political landscape, a disturbing plot has emerged to sabotage the efforts towards peace in the Middle East. According to a recent report, a group of anti-Israel protesters are planning to shut down the White House in a bold attempt to disrupt diplomatic progress. This insidious plan, if successful, could have dire consequences for the region and the world at large. Let us delve deeper into this unsettling revelation from a conservative perspective.

The report reveals that a coalition of anti-Israel activists is mobilizing to stage a massive protest in front of the White House, with the aim of obstructing the ongoing peace negotiations between Israel and its neighboring countries.

Risking my life to promote tonight’s special coverage of the White House Correspondents Dinner – see you on the Red Carpet at *9 PM EASTERN* pic.twitter.com/nQGkVAzHNo

— Jimmy Failla (@jimmyfailla) April 27, 2024

This brazen move is not only a blatant attack on democracy but also a clear indication of their anti-Semitic agenda. It is evident that these protesters have no regard for the fragile state of affairs in the Middle East and are willing to jeopardize the progress towards stability and peace.

The timing of this planned protest is also highly suspect. With the recent signing of the Abraham Accords, which saw the normalization of relations between Israel and several Arab countries, it is no coincidence that these anti-Israel forces are now attempting to disrupt the peace talks. This only goes to show their disdain for any efforts towards achieving lasting peace in the region. It is clear that their true intentions are not to promote peace, but rather to sow seeds of discord and chaos.

SATURDAY

Join us to SHUT DOWN the White House Correspondents’ Dinner and honor Palestinian journalists!

5PM
1865 Kalorama Rd NWhttps://t.co/TicR9ltcfC pic.twitter.com/vRZmTjBpdQ

— CODEPINK (@codepink) April 24, 2024

Furthermore, the report also exposes the involvement of foreign actors in funding and orchestrating these protests. This raises questions about the real agenda behind this disruptive movement. Is it a mere coincidence that these protests are being organized at a time when the Biden administration is making efforts to rebuild relationships with traditional US allies in the Middle East? It is alarming to think that foreign entities may be using these protesters as pawns to serve their own interests, with no regard for the safety and stability of the region.

The ramifications of this planned protest are far-reaching and could have serious consequences for the US and its allies. Not only would it hinder the progress towards peace, but it would also send a message to other countries that the US is vulnerable to such acts of sabotage.

This could embolden other anti-Israel forces to follow suit and further destabilize the region. As a conservative, it is concerning to see the US being used as a pawn in a larger game of political maneuvering.

In conclusion, the report on the planned disruption of White House peace by anti-Israel protesters is a cause for great concern. It is a calculated move to derail the progress towards peace in the Middle East and serves as a reminder of the dangers posed by foreign interference in domestic affairs.

As we continue to witness the unfolding events, it is imperative that the US government takes swift action to protect its interests and uphold its commitment towards achieving peace in the region. Let us stand firm against any attempts to undermine democracy and disrupt the delicate balance of power in the Middle East.

What are YOUR thoughts on the plan?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.

The post The Planned Disruption of White House Peace by Anti-Israel Protesters appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

As the 2020 presidential election draws near, the stakes are higher than ever. With the American people eagerly waiting to hear the candidates’ positions on crucial issues, the first presidential debate was nothing short of a battlefield.

However, what unfolded on that stage was not just a clash of ideologies, but a revelation of the true intentions behind the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden. As a conservative, it is impossible to ignore the blatant manipulation and control exhibited by Biden’s team, as seen in his recent interview with Howard Stern on “The Howard Stern Show.”

Watch President Trump roast Joe Biden during the first Presidential Debate of 2020 pic.twitter.com/dw31DYk3te

— Jonas Viereck (@jonas_viereck) April 21, 2024

In what can only be described as a moment of truth, Biden admitted to being coached by his handlers before the debate, agreeing to their commands without question. This display of puppetry left the American people wondering who is really pulling the strings behind the scenes. With the entire nation watching, Biden’s handlers were exposed for what they truly are – the masterminds behind his campaign.

But this is not the first time that Biden’s handlers have come under fire for their attempts to control the Democratic nominee. During the debate, it was clear that Biden’s responses were carefully crafted and rehearsed, leaving little room for authenticity. It was evident that his team’s primary concern was not to present Biden’s true beliefs, but rather to appease their own agenda. This raises the question – who is the real candidate here? Is it Biden or his handlers?

REPORTER: “Are you ready to debate Trump now?”

BIDEN (surrounded by handlers): *shuffles inside* pic.twitter.com/UPgjXXMH6R

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 26, 2024

As a conservative, it is concerning to see a potential president being controlled by a group of individuals who have their own personal and political motives. It is not just about who won or lost the debate, but the underlying implications of a leader who cannot think for himself. How can we trust someone to lead our country when they are unable to make decisions without their handlers’ approval? Biden’s lack of independence is a clear indication that he is not fit to be the leader of the free world.

Furthermore, it is alarming to see the media’s attempt to cover up Biden’s lackluster performance and the manipulation of his handlers. Despite the obvious evidence, mainstream media outlets have failed to address this issue and have instead focused on attacking President Trump. This biased coverage only further reinforces the idea that the media is complicit in this facade of a campaign, choosing to protect Biden’s image rather than present the truth.

As we reflect on the debate, it is evident that Biden’s handlers have failed to present a strong and capable leader. Their desperate attempts to control Biden’s every move only reveal their lack of confidence in his abilities. As a conservative, it is clear that we cannot entrust our country to a candidate who is not in control of his own campaign. We need a leader who can make independent and informed decisions, not one who is controlled by his handlers.

In the end, Biden’s performance in the debate was not just a disappointment, but a wake-up call for the American people. It exposed the true intentions of his handlers and their attempts to manipulate the Democratic nominee for their own gain. As we move closer to the election, it is essential to look beyond the surface and critically evaluate the candidates and their teams. We must not be blinded by the media’s biased coverage and instead seek the truth – a truth that was revealed on that debate stage.

What are YOUR thoughts on the debate?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.

The post How Biden’s Debate Performance Exposed His Puppeteer Handlers appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

In the midst of the constant barrage of liberal rhetoric, one voice has emerged to call out their double standards and false claims. Former Republican Governor Chris Christie has boldly spoken out against the left’s constant attacks on conservative principles. In a recent article, he addresses the hypocrisy of their tactics and their ultimate goal: the downfall of the conservative movement. As we dive into Christie’s powerful words, let us uncover the truth behind the liberal agenda and its destructive consequences.

With a pointed title, “Where They Both Die Nasty,” Christie exposes the vicious nature of liberal attacks and their ultimate desire to silence the voices of the right. As he dives deeper into his argument, he reveals the true intentions behind the left’s divisive tactics. He boldly calls out their attempts to demonize and vilify conservative leaders, painting them as the enemy rather than engaging in meaningful discourse. Christie challenges us to see through the veil of false accusations and recognize the true enemy at hand: liberal hypocrisy.

Chris Christie has fully lost it.

This week, the morbidly obese failed Presidential candidate openly called for the deaths of Donald Trump and Vivek Ramaswamy:

“I’d hope for a death match where they both die.”

These are the words of a sad man with no purpose. pic.twitter.com/2t3l3rGchn

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) April 26, 2024

The article goes on to highlight the stark contrast between the left and the right when it comes to handling criticism and debate. While conservatives are often subjected to harsh and unfair scrutiny, they are expected to handle it with grace and civility.

On the other hand, liberals use aggressive and underhanded tactics to silence any opposition, refusing to engage in meaningful dialogue. As Christie aptly puts it, “the left wants us dead, but they don’t want to have to explain why.” This sheds light on their true intentions, to silence any opposition and further their own agenda.

Chris Christie being hauled off to jail after Trump takes office… pic.twitter.com/Ts6u1JS3Bi

— Joey Mannarino (@JoeyMannarinoUS) April 27, 2024

Christie also delves into the issue of cancel culture, a growing trend in the liberal community. He calls out the hypocrisy of those who claim to champion free speech and open dialogue, yet resort to silencing and censoring any differing opinions. He argues that this kind of behavior is antithetical to true democracy and only serves to further divide our nation. This thought-provoking argument raises the question: who are the true champions of free speech and democracy?

Furthermore, Christie addresses the liberal narrative of victimhood and how it is used to manipulate and control the masses. He challenges the notion that one’s race or gender determines their worth and argues that true equality can only be achieved through merit and hard work. He boldly proclaims, “victimhood is a currency and the left is handing it out like candy.” This powerful statement exposes the true agenda behind the left’s push for identity politics.

In his final paragraphs, Christie calls on his fellow conservatives to stand strong and united against the relentless attacks from the left. He urges us to continue speaking out and fighting for our beliefs, despite the backlash we may face. He reminds us that the conservative movement is about individual freedom and personal responsibility, principles that are often disregarded by the left. As we stand firm in our beliefs, we must also continue to hold the left accountable for their hypocrisy and divisive tactics.

In conclusion, Chris Christie’s article serves as a wake-up call to the conservative community to see through the liberal lies and stand strong against their attacks. As we continue to navigate through the ever-changing political landscape, let us remember the words of one of our own, “we need to stand up and fight back, and not be afraid to engage in the battle.” With this in mind, we can continue to defend our beliefs and preserve the values that make America great.

What are YOUR thoughts on Chris Christie?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.

The post Unmasking the Liberal Hypocrisy: The Truth Behind Chris Christie’s Divisive Words appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Russell Brand shares he will be baptized on Sunday.

Popular actor and podcaster Russell Brand has embarked on a spiritual journey in recent months, increasingly focusing on Christianity and Catholicism.

Breitbart News reports that “Last year, he expressed his need for God in his life, insisting without Him he ‘cannot cope in this world.’”

Earlier this year, he began wearing a crucifix around his neck.

The Gateway Pundit reported that he recently taught his viewers how to pray the rosary during an episode of his show.

Baptism. This Sunday I’m taking the plunge! How was it for you? pic.twitter.com/DnwcUrzoqa

— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) April 26, 2024

The post Russell Brand Announces He Will Be Baptized This Sunday (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Another one!

Florida GOP Rep. Bill Posey on Friday abruptly announced he will be retiring from Congress at the end of the year.

The 76-year-old was first elected to represent Florida’s 8th Congressional District in 2008.

“It has been the greatest honor of Katie’s and my life to represent you in Congress,” Bill Posey said in a statement. “And, polls suggest that because of YOUR support, I could remain in the job forever, and we were looking forward to another spirited campaign for a final term in office. However, earlier this week circumstances beyond my control now require me to suspect my re-election campaign.”

“I will continue to devote all possible resources to continue representing you through the end of my current term, helping President Donald Trump return to the oval office, and supporting former Florida Senate President Mike Haridopolos, in whom I have the greatest trust and confidence, to take up my battles against the swamp and replace me as your Congressman,” he said.

Bill Posey endorsed Mike Haridopolos to replace his seat.

“For many years, Mike has served as my Congressional Finance Committee Chairman, while I have mentored him to replace me,” Posey said. “Mike was, and remains, my first choice to represent you, me, and our district in Congress.”

Last week GOP Rep. Jake LaTurner (KS) announced he won’t seek reelection in November. He was first elected to the House of Representatives in 2020.

According to Axios, more Republican lawmakers are expected to announce retirements in the next few weeks.

More than 23 House Republicans have announced they will not seek reelection in 2024.

Last month RINO Representative Mike Gallagher (WI) announced he would exit the House in mid-April.

Following the resignation of Mike Gallagher, Kevin McCarthy, Bill Johnson, Ken Buck and the ousting of George Santos, the Republicans are left with a one-seat majority!

The post Another Republican Rep. Abruptly Announces Retirement! Florida Rep. Bill Posey Won’t Seek Reelection appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.