Associated Press Admits Bogus Charges Against Trump 2020 Alternative Electors Are ‘Part of a Campaign to Deter’ Republicans in 2024

The Associated Press admitted the obvious in a report on Friday: “Charges against Trump’s 2020 ‘fake electors’ are expected to deter a repeat this year.”

Author Nicholas Riccardi goes even further, suggesting the latest indictment of 18 people in Arizona “could help shape the landscape of challenges to the 2024 election.”

81 Million vote-getter Joe Biden must be proud of his comrades in Arizona, Michigan, Georgia, and New York.

The Gateway Pundit reported that the still questionably elected Kris Mayes announced felony charges against 18 Trump allies and alternative electors on Wednesday afternoon for the non-crime of questioning the 2020 election. She defended her witch hunt and the curious timing of the indictment – just months before the 2024 general election.

The charges include nine counts of conspiracy, fraudulent schemes and artifices, fraudulent schemes and practices, and forgery. “Defendants and unindicted coconspirators schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency to keep Unindicted Coconspirator 1 in office against the will of Arizona’s voters,” the indictment alleges.

Elen leftist operatives and leftwing media admit the charges are a warning shot to anyone who may want to challenge the 2024 election. See the full list of 18 defendants facing felony charges in Arizona here.

Mayes recently said the quiet part out loud late last month, declaring, “We absolutely have to get President Biden reelected,” before announcing the indictment by an Arizona grand jury in the latest election interference lawfare.

WATCH: “We Absolutely Have to Get President Biden Reelected” – Leftist Arizona AG Kris Mayes Says The Quiet Part Out Loud Before Announcing Grand Jury Indictment Against Trump 2020 Alternate Electors

However, the alleged crime is perfectly legal and has legal precedent.

Per Politico:

By December 1960, it was clear Kennedy had won. Only Hawaii’s result remained in doubt. Nixon had prevailed by just 140 votes, according to the initial results, which were certified by the governor. A recount was underway on Dec. 19, 1960, when presidential electors across the nation were required by law to meet and cast their ballots.

Nixon’s Hawaii electors met and cast their three votes in an official ceremony. But nearby, Kennedy’s three elector nominees gathered and signed their own certificates, delivering them to Washington as though Kennedy had won the state.

As was done in Hawaii, Arizona’s Trump electors met and cast their votes in case of a successful legal challenge while lawsuits challenging the stolen 2020 election were still ongoing.

Recall that the Arizona Attorney General at the time, Mark Brnovich, released a report on his investigation in April 2022, stating that “between 100,000 and 200,000 ballots were transported without a proper chain of custody,” and individuals would be prosecuted for election fraud. However, the weak, lethargic AG never followed through.

Even the election officials in Maricopa County, which accounts for roughly 60% of Arizona’s voters, knew the election was rigged with dead voters, ballot harvesting, and shady machine software and admitted that the County’s in-house audit of the 2020 election was “bulsh*t.” Former Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri previously stated that his colleagues lied because they were too scared to do a real audit in conversations while the Arizona 2020 election audit was ongoing.

The AP article also cites David Becker, the far-left operative who founded the Soros-funded ERIC system, and Justin Levitt of the Brennan Center, one of the organizations that petitioned the Biden Department of Justice to shut down the 2020 election audit in Arizona, to drive home the point that the reason behind the indictments is deterrence.

The same people who have been trying to deter election investigations since November 2020 are finally getting their wish thanks to the Marxist Attorneys General and District Attorneys the Biden Regime sent in to go after Republicans.

The Federalist reports,

The outlet cited Center for Election Innovation & Research founder David Becker — whose organization helped dump hundreds of millions of dollars in “Zuckbucks” into local election offices to influence election administration — to emphasize the “deterrent effect.”

“People are going to have to think twice about doing things to undermine the election,” Becker told the AP. “The deterrent effect is real.”

Riccardi also quoted Justin Levitt, a veteran of the left-wing Brennan Center who was tapped as a senior adviser for “democracy and voting rights” by the Biden White House in 2021, to cheer the “severity” of the lawfare being waged against Republicans.

“One of the things that fosters deterrence most is swiftness and severity,” Levitt reportedly said. “Though the wheels of justice are turning slow, they are turning, and we are seeing consequences for the lieutenants in this conspiracy.”

It’s not just the AP drawing the connection. A well-known election integrity advocate told The Federalist she was contacted by a New York Times reporter on Thursday and was asked whether the Arizona indictments and other “state elections cases impact your strategy/approach to the 2024 election?”

Additionally, as the Federalist notes, Peter Beinart wrote an article in The Atlantic on November 21, 2016, titled “The Electoral College Was Meant to Stop Men Like Trump From Being President,” as many Democrats urged electors to vote for Hillary Clinton following her 2016 defeat. Larry Lessig also wrote for The Washington Post on November 24, 2016, an article titled “The Constitution lets the electoral college choose the winner. They should choose Clinton.”

The post Associated Press Admits Bogus Charges Against Trump 2020 Alternative Electors Are ‘Part of a Campaign to Deter’ Republicans in 2024 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Buckingham Palace Announces That King Charles Will Return to His Public Duties, but Rumors About His Poor Health Are Generating Major Controversy

It is a running mystery in the United Kingdom and around the world: what exactly is the state of King Charles’ health?

Everyone is considering that, but it is anathema to ask.

Read: Britain’s King Charles Diagnosed With Cancer

On the surface, Buckingham Palace has announced that the King is returning to his public duties, which would of course imply that he is improving in health.

But reports arise that are commenting on the increasing chatter that King Charles’ health is much worse than his aides are suggesting.

Daily Beast reported:

“Speaking to friends of the king in recent weeks about his health, the most common response is a lowering of the voice by half an octave or so, followed by the sombre, drawn-out pronouncement: ‘It’s not good’.”

Palace officials won’t publicly comment on that, of course.

Since his aides disclosed the King’s cancer diagnosis earlier this year, they also specified that they wouldn’t be providing a ‘running commentary on his health’.

“The king has never said what specific type of cancer he has been diagnosed with, apart from to say it was not prostate cancer. He is understood to be making regular visits to London for radiotherapy treatment, which can be used to treat many different types of cancer.

Of course, were Charles a private individual, his health would be nobody’s business but his own. But he is the leader of a hereditary monarchy, a head of state who can only be removed by death (or abdication, but that doesn’t seem likely to happen given the late Queen Elizabeth’s precedent). Much as his office may not wish to acknowledge it, his prognosis is very much a matter of public interest. It is certainly preoccupying some individuals in certain branches of government.”

Charles’ funeral plans are being regularly updated, it is reported.

“One old friend of the family, for example, told The Daily Beast, ‘Of course he is determined to beat it and they are throwing everything at it. Everyone is staying optimistic, but he is really very unwell. More than they are letting on’.”

The possibility of the King’s death is not openly mentioned by the U.K. press.

Christopher Andersen, the New York Times best-selling royal writer: “King Charles’ reign will by definition be short, but it’s anyone’s guess at this time just how short. In the meantime, the tried-and-true practice of revising funeral plans should not be used to make that determination. What would be enormously helpful is for the palace to be transparent about the king’s condition and his prognosis. Until that happens, gossip and speculation will continue to swirl, and conspiracy theories will abound.”

Read more:

King Charles Appears In Public For First Time Since Cancer Diagnosis On Easter Sunday

 

The post Buckingham Palace Announces That King Charles Will Return to His Public Duties, but Rumors About His Poor Health Are Generating Major Controversy appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

POLL: Biden Trails Trump in Six Swing States – 70% Say Economy is on the “Wrong Track”

According to a recent poll, President Trump currently holds a lead in six of the seven key swing states that are expected to determine the 2024 Presidential Election.

The results of the Bloomberg/Morning Consult swing state poll  are as follows:

Trump leads Biden by seven points in Arizona (49%-42%).
Trump leads Biden by six points in Georgia (49%-43%).
Trump leads Biden by eight points in Nevada (51%-43%).
Trump leads Biden by ten points in North Carolina (51%-41%).
Trump leads Biden by four points in Wisconsin (48%-44%).
Trump leads Biden by one point in Pennsylvania (47%-46%).

Biden only leads Trump in Michigan by just two points with 47%-45%.

Joe Biden won with massive voter fraud in all of these states in 2020 except for North Carolina.

Trump’s lead from a December 2023 Bloomberg/Morning Consult poll has increased by three points in Arizona, five points in Nevada, and one point in North Carolina.

POLL: Donald Trump Leads Biden in Seven Swing States Heading Into 2024

70% of voters in these states said the United States economy is on the “wrong track,” and 51% of voters say they trust Trump more on the economy, while just 36% say Biden.

This comes as the GDP dropped faster than expected in the first quarter of 2024 and at half the rate of Q4 2023. Real GDP increased 1.6% after rising 3.7% in the fourth quarter of 2023.

Meanwhile, inflation rose to 3.7% in the first quarter – squeezing consumers who are already strapped in the Biden economy.

Per New York Post,

Swing-state voters said the economy was the top issue with almost six months to go before Election Day, with 82% saying it will be “very important” in deciding whom they vote for and 34% saying it would be their single most important issue.

Immigration ranked second, with 15% saying it was their top issue, while abortion and democracy were tied for third at 9% each.

Seven in 10 respondents said they viewed the US economy as going in the “wrong direction,” while 57% said the same about the economy in their own state.

The bad poll numbers for Biden come despite his campaign spending $30 million in the month after his March 7 State of the Union address on ad buys and campaign stops in critical swing states — a push that Democrats dubbed the “Month of Action.”

Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt told The New York, “Americans realize if they want to make gas cheap again and keep more money in their pockets, they must vote Trump.” Leavitt added, “Joe Biden’s economic policies are robbing people of thousands every month, and Biden is doubling down, promising to sign the largest tax hike in American history if given another four years in the White House.”

 

The post POLL: Biden Trails Trump in Six Swing States – 70% Say Economy is on the “Wrong Track” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

BREAKING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps’ FBI Call to the American Public

After the release of this incriminating audio, federal agents raided J6 political prisoner Ryan Samsel’s jail cell and dragged him to solitary confinement in the hole of the Metropolitan Detention Center Brooklyn on Thursday night.

Earlier today, Alicia Powe at The Gateway Pundit exposed J6 insurrection leader Ray Epps lying to the FBI in a leaked interview to The Gateway Pundit.

Epps repeatedly lied to authorities saying he was listening to President Trump’s speech at the Ellipse when there is numerous video clips proving Epps was not being truthful.

Ray Epps was directing Trump supporters to the US Capitol for hours before the protests on Capitol Hill.  Epps later was one of the leading protesters who broke through the first and second set of barriers going to the US Capitol.

J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel Exposes James Ray Epps Breaking Federal Law In Leaked FBI Call: ‘We Were Listening To The, Uh, Speech’ [Part 2]

Samsel was removed from his jail cell hours after TGP published the leaked audio of Epps’ phone call to the feds.

He is now being held in solitary confinement in one of the most notoriously dangerous jail systems in the country. 

Ryan Samsel suspected he would face government retaliation for exposing the truth. He was right.

“I challenge the government. Even if they may retaliate and assault me for exposing the truth like they usually do —  you can’t fear, folks. I’m curious as to why I am being treated like this, and guys like Ray Epps are free?” Samsel told TGP while reviewing the uncovered audio.

“Epps is a free man with his family at home when I’ve been constantly moved to dozens of different jails – I’ve been in New York; I’ve been in Philly, I’ve been in Virginia, moved everywhere –and each place I’ve gone I’ve been extremely mistreated. Still to this day, I haven’t gotten any medical treatment.

“I put God first. If they want to take my life, all they can do is destroy my body. I want to take care of it as best I can, but if they want to kill it, you can have it. Come get it. The soul — you can’t destroy my soul.”

***Please support political prisoner Ryan Samsel’s legal defense here *** 

The post BREAKING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps’ FBI Call to the American Public appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

BREAKING: ANOTHER BANK FAILURE: Regulators Seize Philadelphia-Based Republic First Bancorp

Another one!

Regulators seized Philadelphia-based Republic First Bancorp on Friday.

“Republic First operated branches in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York under the name Republic Bank. It had around $6 billion in total assets at the end of 2023.” – The Wall Street Journal reported.

This is the fourth bank failure since last March on Joe Biden’s watch.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was appointed as receiver by Pennsylvania state regulators and immediately entered into an agreement with Fulton Bank to assume assets and deposits of Republic First Bancorp.

“Philadelphia-based Republic Bank was closed late today by Pennsylvania bank regulators, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. To protect depositors, we entered into an agreement with Fulton Bank to assume substantially all deposits and assets of Republic,” the FDIC said in a statement on Friday.

“Republic Bank’s 32 branches in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New York will reopen as branches of Fulton Bank on Saturday (for branches with normal Saturday hours) or on Monday during normal business hours. This evening and over the weekend, depositors of Republic Bank can access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on Republic Bank will continue to be processed and loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual,” the FDIC said.

“Depositors of Republic Bank will become depositors of Fulton Bank so customers do not need to change their banking relationship in order to retain their deposit insurance coverage. Customers of Republic Bank should continue to use their existing branches until they receive notice from Fulton Bank that it has completed systems changes that will allow its branch offices to process their accounts as well,” the FDIC said.

Philadelphia-based Republic Bank was closed late today by Pennsylvania bank regulators, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. To protect depositors, we entered into an agreement with Fulton Bank to assume substantially all deposits and assets of Republic.https://t.co/Fzusk2L74Q pic.twitter.com/b91USjtr4Z

— FDIC (@FDICgov) April 26, 2024

Last month trading of Long Island lender New York Community Bancorp halted on the New York Stock Exchange after its shares tumbled more than 40%.

The regional bank announced a $1 billion capital raise later that day.

Last March Moody’s Investors Service cut its outlook for the entire US banking sector to negative and put six banks on ‘downgrade’ watch.

Silicon Valley Bank, First Republic Bank and Signature Bank failed last year after depositors withdrew billions of dollars from the lending institutions.

The post BREAKING: ANOTHER BANK FAILURE: Regulators Seize Philadelphia-Based Republic First Bancorp appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In Rare Move, SCOTUS Justices Signal They May Grant Certiorari in Case of Peaceful J6 Protestor Russell Alford Who Received Maximum Sentence! Justices Ask DOJ to Defend Their Conviction of Alford by May 23

President Trump salutes as the song Justice for All, for the January 6 prisoners, is played at the start of a campaign rally in Dayton, Ohio, march 16, 2024, photo by Kristinn Taylor.

The United States Supreme Court reportedly signaled that they are considering granting Russell Alford, one of the few J6 defendants to refuse a plea deal, his petition for writ of certiorari, a move that only happens for roughly 1% of cases brought to SCOTUS.

Alford is one of the 75 January 6 defendants who joined The Gateway Pundit in our official request to RINO Speaker McCarthy last year for the government’s January 6 footage.

UPDATE: 75 January 6 Defendants Join Gateway Pundit in Our Official Request to Speaker McCarthy for January 6 Government Footage

Despite walking into the Capitol for just 13 minutes on January 6, where “he mostly stood to the side and observed” and “filmed protestors chanting,” then leaving, according to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Alford was given the maximum sentence for four crimes, including Remaining in a restricted building, Disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building, Disorderly or disruptive conduct in the Capitol Building and parading, and Demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol Building. The Court also ruled that “trespassers in the Capitol during the riot did not need to be acting ‘disorderly’ or ‘disruptive’ to be found guilty of disorderly conduct, because such definitions ‘are nebulous but time has given them concrete contours in two ways important here,’” per Frontline News.

Alford is appealing the ruling from the trial court and Appeals Court that “passive, quiet and nonviolent conduct can be disorderly.”  Though the Supreme Court may not be able to help Alford in his other charges of for “remaining” and “demonstrating” in the Capitol, this could undermine the convictions of thousands of peaceful protesters who were charged with disorderly conduct.

According to Frontline News, “1,156 peaceful January 6 protesters have been charged with engaging in disorderly or disruptive conduct. 1,021 have been charged with disorderly or disruptive conduct in a Capitol building. About 1,000 of them have been hit with both misdemeanor charges. These are the most common charges that the 1,300+ total January 6 peaceful protesters have been hit with.”

The Department of Justice reportedly waived their right to file a response to Alford’s petition, likely because they know the charges are bullsh*t and they will lose!

More from Frontline News:

The Supreme Court has requested a response from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to a petition from a peaceful J6 protestor who is appealing his conviction for disorderly conduct.

99% rejected

The High Court only agrees to grant certiorari, i.e., review a request for appeal, in about eighty out of seven to eight thousand petitions for “a writ of certiorari” each year. Normally, the justices do not give an indication of whether they are inclined to include a particular case in the one percent that get to the next stage, which includes additional briefs and oral arguments, until after receiving a response to the petition and the petitioner’s reply to the response.

Confident feds

In the case of J6 protestor Russell Alford, however, the justices may have already signaled that they are inclined to grant certiorari, a decision which would require the agreement of four of the nine justices. Alford filed his petition to cancel his conviction with SCOTUS in early April and the government had 30 days to respond. Instead of responding, however, the DOJ penned a single sentence to the High Court:

The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court.

The justices then announced that they do indeed want the DOJ to respond, giving it a May 23, 2024 deadline, indicating their interest in the matter.

As Josh Gerstein just reported at Politico, SCOTUS requested a response from DOJ in petition for writ of cert filed by Russell Alford, convicted by a DC jury of 4 misdemeanors for J6.

This doesn’t mean SCOTUS will take up the case but it does mean they want some answers.

The… pic.twitter.com/esI7QgEbam

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 23, 2024

1 act, 13 minutes, 4 convictions

Most J6 defendants, facing multiple charges for the one act of trespassing, waived their right to argue that their entrance into the Capital was an unknowing trespass, fearing the potential for multiple prison sentences. Alford, like America’s Frontline Doctors’ (AFLDS) Creative Director John Strand, was one of the few J6 defendants to refuse a plea deal.

Alford’s trespass was described by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Alford remained inside the Capitol for approximately thirteen minutes…

While inside, he mostly stood to the side and observed. He filmed protestors chanting “stop the steal” and pounding on a door that led to the floor of the House, behind which sheltered dozens of Congress members. [Emphasis added.]

The court added that Alford left within three minutes of police telling the crowd to leave:

Police arrived within about ten minutes of Alford’s entry and began physically and verbally directing the crowd back out through the Upper House Door. Alford initially moved further down the hallway before turning and making for the exit … He left once someone managed to open the second double door.

For this, the trial court convicted Alford on four separate counts, all stemming from that 13-minute walk during which he did not so much as yell. He was given the maximum sentence for each charge, to be served concurrently, resulting in a 12-month sentence for:

Remaining in a restricted building
Disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building
Disorderly or disruptive conduct in the Capitol Building and parading
Demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol Building [Emphasis added.]

Overcharging banned; not banned

The DOJ is actually prohibited from engaging in so-called overcharging, particularly in the the District of Columbia Circuit, in which Alford’s trial court sits, where the circuit’s appellate court has, for more than 50 years, explicitly banned the practice of overcharging defendants where the intent is to coerce a guilty plea on a lesser charge:

. . . the prosecutor clearly cannot have carte blanche to apply whatever tactics he wishes to induce a guilty plea. A policy of deliberately overcharging defendants with no intention of prosecuting on all counts simply in order to have chips at the bargaining table would, for example, constitute improper harassment of the defendant. [Emphasis added.]

Nonetheless, J6 protestors have been uniformly subjected to multiple charges in the absence of separate actions. Technically, though, Alford’s case does not fit this classic definition of overcharging, since the DOJ, perhaps sensing a jury pool antagonistic to J6 protestors, did in fact prosecute Alford on multiple charges. But it is not, in any case, overcharging that is at issue in the petition to the Supreme Court.

Not disorderly; disorderly

Alford appealed his convictions on the two charges requiring the government to prove “disorderly or disruptive conduct.” The trial court refused Alford’s motion to acquit on those charges, despite the lack of any evidence of such conduct, arguing that he should be held guilty on account of the actions of (a small minority) the other protestors:

Mr. Alford’s mere presence inside the Capitol disturbed the public peace or undermined public safety” and that “his presence was an aspect of the disorder and disruption of the Capitol.” [Emphasis added].

“Even passive, quiet and nonviolent conduct can be disorderly”

The appellate court agreed with prosecutors and the lower court:

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that trespassers in the Capitol during the riot did not need to be acting “disorderly” or “disruptive” to be found guilty of disorderly conduct, because such definitions “are nebulous but time has given them concrete contours in two ways important here.”

“First, it is well-established that whether conduct qualifies as disorderly depends on the surrounding circumstances,” the court wrote …

“Second, it is equally clear from caselaw that even passive, quiet and nonviolent conduct can be disorderly,” the ruling continued. [Emphases added].

JUST IN: #SCOTUS signals it may undermine more common #Jan6 charges as justices ask DOJ to respond to petition challenging ‘disorderly or disruptive’ charges v. Russell Alford. DC Cir ruled charges valid even for nonviolent protesters. Earlier: https://t.co/QMDbF9UM7z

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) April 23, 2024

It is this ruling, that “passive, quiet and nonviolent conduct can be disorderly,” that is at issue in Alford’s appeal to the Supreme Court.

High Court may help … others

Should the nation’s highest court rule that such peaceful behavior as Alford’s cannot be the basis for a disorderly conduct conviction, it may not actually benefit Alford, as his two convictions for “remaining” and “demonstrating” in the Capital would still stand and for each he was sentenced to the maximum prison time, as mentioned above, to run concurrently.

Since the maximum sentence for the charge of merely remaining in a restricted building is one year, even vacating the two disorderly charges would still leave Alford facing a year in prison, though he could argue that, without the disorderly charges, one year is excessive for trespassing.

Alford is far from the only peaceful J6 protestor to be charged with disorderly conduct, however. According to Conservative Zone, 1,156 of those protestors were charged with disorderly conduct despite their peaceful conduct.

1,156 peaceful January 6 protesters have been charged with engaging in disorderly or disruptive conduct. 1,021 have been charged with disorderly or disruptive conduct in a Capitol building. About 1,000 of them have been hit with both misdemeanor charges. These are the most common charges that the 1,300+ total January 6 peaceful protesters have been hit with.

None of the people facing these charges did anything violent or caused any property damage. They were welcomed into the building by police officers who were high-fiving them and holding doors open for them, they wandered around for a while, and they peacefully left when asked to do so.

The post In Rare Move, SCOTUS Justices Signal They May Grant Certiorari in Case of Peaceful J6 Protestor Russell Alford Who Received Maximum Sentence! Justices Ask DOJ to Defend Their Conviction of Alford by May 23 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NYC Construction Worker Has STRONG Message for President Biden… | Beyond the Headlines

NYC Construction Worker Has STRONG Message for President Biden… | Beyond the Headlines

There’s middle America — AKA the “Flyover” states — and then there’s the coastal metropolises, such as Los Angeles, Seattle and New York City. Typically, these areas have leaned heavily democrat over the past few decades, but given Joe Biden’s extremely poor performance, things could change RADICALLY in the upcoming election. One construction worker in NYC is a prime example of this… what did he have to say to Joe?

Elijah Schaffer gets into all this and more on today’s Beyond the Headlines!

The post NYC Construction Worker Has STRONG Message for President Biden… | Beyond the Headlines appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Biden Border Crisis: Border Patrol Agent in El Paso Shot at By Armed Thugs from Mexican Side of Border

The never-ending border crisis in Joe Biden’s America.

A Border Patrol agent was shot at by armed thugs near El Paso, Texas in San Elizario early Thursday afternoon. The shots were fired from the Mexican side of the border. The agent returned fire according to the CBP while no injuries were reported.

According to a CBP internal alert, the armed thugs never entered the US.

El Paso Times reported:

A person in Mexico shot at a U.S. Border Patrol agent during a “use of force” incident near San Elizario, authorities said.

The shooting happened before 1:30 p.m. Thursday, April 25, at the U.S.-Mexico border near the San Elizario area.

The agent came “under fire from the Mexican side” of the border, a law enforcement source told the El Paso Times. The shooting was described as a “use of force incident.”

According to Ali Bradley, in addition to Thursday’s incident, another incident happened last week involving an illegal alien who was stabbing other illegals in the El Paso sector. A National Guard soldier that was deployed under Operation Lonestar shot the illegal.

#BREAKING A Border Patrol agent in the El Paso sector was shot at today by 2-3 armed subjects on the Mexico side—The agent fired back, no injuries were reported—According to CBP sources.

The armed subjects never entered the U.S. according to an internal alert sent out in the… https://t.co/l26911CGrk pic.twitter.com/5EqIrgpIiR

— Ali Bradley (@AliBradleyTV) April 26, 2024

The root of the problem is the Federal Government’s unwillingness to secure our border which is their role under the US Constitution in Article IV, Section 4.

In February, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas was on NBCs “Meet the Press.” In his interview he dodged all responsibility for the border crisis.

“Do you bear responsibility for what is happening at the border?” Kristin Welker asked.

“We don’t bear responsibility for a broken system,” Mayorkas continued.

Watch:

WATCH: DHS Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas says that DHS doesn’t “bear responsibility” for the “broken” immigration system.@SecMayorkas: “The system has not been fixed for 30 years. … Congress is the only one who can fix it.” pic.twitter.com/dzDH0GQPQW

— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) February 11, 2024

Under the Biden regime, a shocking 10 to 12 million illegals have entered the United States since January 2021.

That number equals about the population of 41 individual states

The post Biden Border Crisis: Border Patrol Agent in El Paso Shot at By Armed Thugs from Mexican Side of Border appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Florida Man Arrested for Theft While Dressed Like a Woman to Avoid Police

In a plot that sounds straight out of a 1980s movie, a Florida man has been arrested for theft while dressed as a woman to avoid being noticed by police.

Joshua Kolotka, 33, was arrested by police in Glades County on Wednesday for allegedly trying to steal a boat.

Gulf Live reports, “Glades County Sheriff’s Office deputies were actively searching for a man they suspected of stealing a boat in the old Calusa Lodge area of Lakeport, Florida when they noticed someone exiting a nearby home.”

Though Kolotka wore a long blonde wig and a blue dress, deputies immediately recognized him.

In a post on Facebook, the Glades County Sheriff’s Office wrote, “The deputies were able to apprehend Joshua Kolotka and he was arrested for two Okeechobee County warrants, along with the theft of a John Deere Gator and the stolen boat.”

“It should also be noted that numerous other items were located on-scene,” the post continued. “These items were possibly stolen from the same area.”

The Glades County Sheriff’s Office is now working with the Seminole Police Department to identify some of the stolen items from other theft cases in that area.

The post Florida Man Arrested for Theft While Dressed Like a Woman to Avoid Police appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WATCH: Joe Rogan Mocks CNN’s Bad Ratings, ‘Way More People Listen to My Podcast’

Joe Rogan mocked CNN’s poor ratings while talking about how the network attacked him in 2021 for taking ivermectin to treat COVID.

CNN had allegedly played Rogan’s video discussing his treatment plan, after editing it to make him appear more yellow and sickly.

Rogan took a dig at the network by noting that he was not worried about their negative coverage because his podcast has more viewers.

“They didn’t understand that I have way more people that listen to my podcast than they have, way more,” Rogan said.

“That’s crazy if you think you’re going to make me look yellow. Like, the video’s still on my Instagram, you f-cking idiots,” he said. “Everybody can see what I really looked like.”

Rogan noted that there are still people who believe he took veterinary medicines.

“There’s still people who think I took veterinary medicine. There’s still people that think I was an idiot for taking ivermectin. There’s a bunch of people, they’re surface-level readers, they read headlines, they watch a quick clip on CNN. That’s their consumption of media,” he said. “But most people are not like that anymore. Most people have a real keen understanding that these people are viciously corrupt and coordinated.”

Mediaite reports:

It’s difficult to gauge the total audiences of Rogan and CNN since both are spread onto multiple platforms. Bloomberg reported last month that Spotify tested a feature disclosing podcast numbers, and Rogan had 14.5 million followers, making him nearly three times more popular than the next most popular podcast. That number would also massively dwarf CNN’s cable numbers, which did see an uptick in Q1.

Rogan has also begun posting episodes to YouTube again after a more exclusive arrangement with Spotify. The episode with Singh has brought in more than 600,000 viewers there.

The post WATCH: Joe Rogan Mocks CNN’s Bad Ratings, ‘Way More People Listen to My Podcast’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.