HILARIOUS: Biden With Embarrassing GAFFE, Crowd Cheers Anyway | Beyond the Headlines

HILARIOUS: Biden With Embarrassing GAFFE, Crowd Cheers Anyway | Beyond the Headlines

We all know Joe Biden isn’t exactly the sharpest tool in the shed. Despite the MSM trying to cover up for him and attribute his gaffes to a “stutter”, one recent mistake proves that’s not the case – and ol’ Joe just isn’t cognitively fit to serve as Commander in Chief anymore, much less ever. What did Biden do this time?

Elijah Schaffer discusses all this and more on today’s Beyond the Headlines!

The post HILARIOUS: Biden With Embarrassing GAFFE, Crowd Cheers Anyway | Beyond the Headlines appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Attorney Humiliates Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson During Oral Arguments on Immunity Claim (AUDIO)

John Sauer, the Missouri-based attorney for Trump, humiliated liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson during Thursday’s oral arguments on Trump’s immunity claim before the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court on Thursday heard oral arguments on Trump’s presidential immunity claim in Jack Smith’s January 6 case in DC after a federal appeals court ruled Trump was not immune from prosecution.

Trump’s lawyers previously argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President.

At issue before the Supreme Court is whether a US President is immune from criminal prosecution for official (not personal) acts.

Ketanji Brown Jackson, the dumbest woman on the high court (who can’t define a woman), set herself up when she tried to argue that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes if they had immunity from prosecution.

“Presidents from the beginning of time had understood that that’s a possibility, that might be what has kept this office from turning into the kind of crime center that I’m envisioning, but once we say, ‘no criminal liability Mr. President – you can do whatever you want.’ – I’m worried that we would have a worse problem than the problem of the president feeling constrained to follow the law while he’s in office,” Ketanji Brown Jackson said.

This woman is truly stupid. She walked right into it.

John Sauer dunked on Ketanji Brown Jackson.

“I respectfully disagree with that because the regime you’ve described is the regime we’ve operated under for over 234 years,” John Sauer said. “There has not been an expectation based on 234 years of unbroken political…”

Mic drop.

Ketanji Brown Jackson stuttered as she interrupted John Sauer.

AUDIO:

Former Gorsuch law clerk Mike Davis on Thursday predicted the Supreme Court will likely rule 5-4 or 6-3 in favor of President Trump in his presidential immunity case because it puts the court in a safer position.

WATCH:

This Is So Much Bigger Than President Trump

.@Article3Project President and Founder @mrddmia says SCOTUS will likely rule 5-4 or 6-3 on President Donald Trump’s presidential immunity case because it puts the court in a safer position, especially on a novel legal issue. Davis… pic.twitter.com/ZsnP8V8Nzr

— Real America’s Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) April 25, 2024

The post Trump Attorney Humiliates Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson During Oral Arguments on Immunity Claim (AUDIO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Justice Alito Destroys Jack Smith’s Prosecutor During Trump Immunity Oral Arguments with One Question (AUDIO)

The Supreme Court on Thursday heard oral arguments on Trump’s presidential immunity claim in Jack Smith’s January 6 case in DC.

The case made its way to the Supreme Court after the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Trump was not immune from prosecution.

Trump’s lawyers previously argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ committed while he served as US President.

John Sauer, a Missouri-based attorney for Trump, gave an opening statement on Thursday and argued that Jack Smith’s indictment uses vague statutes to criminalize “core authority” of the presidency.

Sauer argued that immunity protects past presidents such as George W. Bush and Barack Obama from being prosecuted for crimes they committed while in federal office.

AUDIO:

As expected, the liberal justices, similar to the appellate court judges, floated absurd hypotheticals.

The justices then had the opportunity to grill Jack Smith’s prosecutor Michael Dreeben. Recall that Dreeben was one of Mueller’s goons in the special counsel’s ‘Trump-Russia’ inquisition.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito destroyed DOJ prosecutor Michael Dreeben with one question.

“If the president gets advice from the attorney general, that something is lawful, is that an absolute defense?” Alito asked Dreeben.

“Yes, I think that it is,” Dreeben said.

“But won’t that give presidents incentive to be sure to pick an Attorney General who will reliably tell the president that it is lawful to do whatever the president wants to do if there’s any possible argument in favor of it?” Alito asked Dreeben.

“I think the Constitutional structure protects against that risk. The president nominates the attorney general and the Senate provides advice and consent,” Dreeben said.

This line of questioning also dovetails other questions asked by Gorsuch related to subordinate liability.

AUDIO:

Justice Alito also asked about FDR’s decision to put Japanese-Americans in camps during WWII.

“What about President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s decision to intern Japanese-Americans during World War II, couldn’t that have been charged?” Alito asked Dreeben.

“Today, yes,” Michael Dreeben said.

AUDIO:

Justice Alito wonders why Trump is the only former President charged, asks, “What about President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s decision to intern Japanese-Americans during World War II, couldn’t that have been charged?” DOJ lawyer Michael Dreeben responds, “Today, yes.” WATCH pic.twitter.com/KHV0PaAIuo

— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) April 25, 2024

The post Justice Alito Destroys Jack Smith’s Prosecutor During Trump Immunity Oral Arguments with One Question (AUDIO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Cuts Biden’s Lead in New York to 10 Points as Democrats Election Interference Efforts Backfire – Union Leader Says Trump Leads Biden Among his Members 3:1 (VIDEO)

Enterprise Association of Steamfitters Local 638 Manager Bobby Barlels

President Trump is narrowing Joe Biden’s lead in Democratic New York with the Democrats’ lawfare against him proving to be a witch hunt.

As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier, President Trump arrived at a construction site in New York on Thursday morning to greet union workers, and he was met with thunderous chants of “USA!” “USA!”

New York Union Workers Chant “USA!” As President Trump Visits Their Construction Site – Union Leader Trashes Democrats, Praises Trump (VIDEO)

Trump told Fox News earlier, “I think these maybe were Democrats, but for me, they’re Republican.”

“There’s not a Democrat in there,” he added:

The union workers love Trump, and according to new polling data, Biden’s lead in New York, a state where Democrats have won by double digits in every presidential election since 1988, continues to shrink.

As Right Side Broadcasting Network reports,

In the latest show of proof that left-wing prosecutors’ efforts to interfere in the 2024 presidential election are backfiring, a newly released survey reveals that President Donald J. Trump may be within striking distance of Joe Biden in one of America’s strongest Democrat states (and the backdrop for Alvin Bragg’s ongoing “hush money” sham trial): New York.

New polling from the Siena College Research Institute, conducted over a three-day period from April 15-17, shows President Trump within ten points of Joe Biden in the state, 37 percent to 47 percent. In February, the same poll, which was taken prior to the start of the New York City trial (which will wrap up week two on Friday), showed Biden leading by 12 (48 percent-36 percent).

Among Independent voters, Trump leads Biden by 14 points, 46 percent-32 percent.

If this margin were to hold (or tighten further) going into November, it could indicate a seismic shift in the voting habits of traditionally deep-blue New York: Joe Biden carried the state’s 29 electoral votes by a margin of 23 points four years ago, and the last time a Republican declared victory there was in 1984 when President Ronald Reagan defeated ex-Vice President Walter Mondale by a more modest 8 points.

New York union leader Bobby Bartels also shared results from a poll he put out in his union, telling Fox, “President Trump is leading Joe Biden three to one on my presidential poll out of my 9,000 members right now.”  

Bartles added, “We are very tired of the situation with groceries, inflation, gas prices, illegal immigration, crime. We’re living it every day in New York City.”

Bartels: It was great to see the president coming and engaging with the blue collar worker of New York City. We basically built New York. The union movement has made the middle class, and we are a very patriotic union, and we are pro America. So, my members, right now, I put out a poll in my union. President Trump is leading Joe Biden three to one on my presidential poll out of my 9,000 members right now. We are very tired of the situation with groceries, inflation, gas prices, illegal immigration, crime. We’re living it every day in New York City.

The post Trump Cuts Biden’s Lead in New York to 10 Points as Democrats Election Interference Efforts Backfire – Union Leader Says Trump Leads Biden Among his Members 3:1 (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Aussie PM Wants to CENSOR Internet Over MEMES | Beyond the Headlines

Aussie PM Wants to CENSOR Internet Over MEMES | Beyond the Headlines

After the most recent violent incidents in Australia with the stabbing at Bondi Crossing and the attack of Bishop Mar Mari, Australian PM Anthony Albanese wants CENSORSHIP on X after his constituents unleashed a flurry of memes making fun of him. Why exactly are Australians so up in arms against Albanese, though?

Elijah Schaffer discusses all this and more on today’s Beyond the Headlines!

The post Aussie PM Wants to CENSOR Internet Over MEMES | Beyond the Headlines appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

N.Y. Decision to Toss Weinstein Case is Bad News for D.A. Alvin Bragg & Great News for Trump (VIDEO)

It’s no secret Harvey Weinstein is a despicable human being. But that doesn’t mean prosecutors get free reign. New York’s highest court ruled the judge tainted the jury by allowing witness to testify about subjects that had nothing to do with the case against him. This is exactly what is happening in the New York court room where President Trump is being tried on a sham records keeping case.

 

For 3 days the CEO of the National Enquirer has been testifying about things that have nothing to do with the underlying allegations against Trump. His testimony is only to serve as a way to make the jury think President Trump is unscrupulous. It amounts to a prosecutorial trick. If New York’s highest court rules that these types of witnesses, that serve only to taint the minds of the jury, are wrong in a convicted sex offender case, it should be wrong in a case against a former President.

While this is happening, The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in the Presidential immunity case that will have far reaching ramifications on ever case brought against President Trump by these deceitful leftists prosecutors across the country. We have the must hear audio that gives us an indication into how the Supreme Court may rule.

The post N.Y. Decision to Toss Weinstein Case is Bad News for D.A. Alvin Bragg & Great News for Trump (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Viral Taylor Swift-Themed Bill Clinton Joke That’s Stirring Up Anger

As the political landscape continues to be rocked by controversial headlines and divisive discussions, one recent news story has taken the internet by storm, causing a stir among conservatives. The source of the uproar? A Taylor Swift-themed joke about former President Bill Clinton, shared by none other than Monica Lewinsky herself.

In a world where political correctness reigns supreme, Lewinsky’s bold move to poke fun at the infamous affair between herself and Clinton has raised eyebrows and sparked heated debates. The fact that the joke went viral only adds fuel to the fire, as conservative voices speak out against what they see as a blatant lack of respect for the highest office in the land.

#BREAKING_NEWS Monica Lewisnky goes viral for Taylor Swift-themed Bill Clinton joke: ‘The asylum where they raised me’ pic.twitter.com/VzWFfJ3thT

— Muhammad Nadir Official (@beingnadiir) April 25, 2024

For those who may have missed the joke, here’s a quick rundown: during a recent interview, Lewinsky was asked about seeking asylum in the UK after her affair with Clinton was exposed. Her response? “If the definition of asylum is, like, a safe place, then, I guess, yes, I’m in asylum.” This clever play on words, accompanied by a photo of her posing with a Taylor Swift album, has now become a hot topic among conservatives.

To many, the joke is not only in poor taste but also a prime example of the double standards that seem to permeate our society. While public figures are constantly scrutinized and condemned for their actions, Lewinsky’s joke seemingly trivializes the seriousness of her involvement in the Clinton scandal. And the fact that it has gained such widespread attention only serves to highlight the perceived liberal bias in the media.

Monica Lewinsky takes a dig at Bill Clinton with Taylor Swift’s song ‘Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me’, the Internet reacts#TaylorSwift #MonicaLewinsky #viral #BillClinton #TheTourturedPoetsDepartment https://t.co/GUgr8IUCw7

— Express Trending (@ietrending) April 25, 2024

But perhaps the most troubling aspect of this entire ordeal, from a conservative standpoint, is the glorification of Taylor Swift in the joke. As one of the most outspoken and politically active celebrities in recent years, Swift’s alignment with the joke and Lewinsky’s overall message only further cements her status as a liberal icon. And with her massive influence on young voters, many on the conservative side fear the potential impact on future elections.

Furthermore, the timing of the joke couldn’t have come at a more controversial moment in politics. With impeachment proceedings against President Trump dominating the news cycle, some conservatives see Lewinsky’s joke as a calculated move to distract and divert attention from the real issues at hand. Others view it as a calculated attack on the Republican party, with Lewinsky seemingly taking advantage of the current political climate to further her own agenda.

As expected, the reactions to the joke have been polarizing, with some praising Lewinsky’s boldness and others condemning her insensitivity. But one thing is for sure: this seemingly innocuous joke has opened up a can of worms in the conservative community, bringing to light deep-seated frustrations and concerns. And with the 2020 election on the horizon, it’s clear that the repercussions of this joke will continue to be felt for a long time to come.

In conclusion, the Taylor Swift-themed joke about Bill Clinton shared by Monica Lewinsky has ignited a fiery debate among conservatives, exposing the ongoing divide in our political climate. From accusations of double standards to fears of liberal influence on young voters, this viral moment has sparked discussions on a range of pressing issues. Only time will tell how this controversial joke will shape the political landscape moving forward.

What are YOUR thoughts on Bill Clinton?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.

The post The Viral Taylor Swift-Themed Bill Clinton Joke That’s Stirring Up Anger appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Banks, MAGA Supporters, and the Biden Administration

In recent months, a concerning trend has emerged that underscores a growing divide between political ideologies and raises serious questions about fairness and justice in America. The actions taken against supporters of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement and their financial dealings have become a focal point of contention, reflecting a broader struggle over freedom of expression and the principles of due process.

At the heart of this issue is the investigation into the events of January 6th and the subsequent measures taken by financial institutions against individuals associated with the MAGA movement. These actions, which include freezing accounts and terminating services, are seen by many conservatives as politically motivated attempts to suppress dissenting voices. Such measures not only infringe on the rights of individuals to freely express their political views but also set a dangerous precedent for the use of financial power to enforce ideological conformity.

BREAKING: U.S. BANKS SPYING ON TRUMP SUPPORTERS?!

At least 13 banks may have collaborated with federal agencies to spy on transactions of hundreds of pro-gun and religious Trump supporters post-January 6th, targeting keywords like ‘MAGA’ and ‘TRUMP.’

House Judiciary… pic.twitter.com/4ce9D8PU1s

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) April 25, 2024

The investigations led by the Biden administration into the events surrounding January 6th have further intensified these concerns. While accountability for any wrongdoing is paramount, the perception among conservatives is that the inquiries have extended beyond the pursuit of justice to become tools of political retribution. This perception is bolstered by reports of selective enforcement and disproportionate responses that seem to target conservative activists and allies disproportionately.

This situation raises fundamental questions about the balance between security and liberty. Conservatives assert that the fight against violence and insurrection does not justify undermining the pillars of our democracy—freedom of speech, the right to assemble, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. When financial institutions act as arbiters of political legitimacy, deciding whom to serve based on political affiliations or activities, the sanctity of these freedoms is at risk.

MAGA BEWARE…THEY ARE COMING FOR US

BECAUSE WE BELIEVE IN GOD AND GUNS

Banks SPIED on Trump Voters:

How 13 Financial Institutions worked with Feds ‘Without Warrants’ to comb Transactions of Pro-Gun and Religious MAGA Supporters after January 6 https://t.co/Z1AVio2O34

— Mark Chudy (@ChudyMark) April 25, 2024

Moreover, the role of the Biden administration in guiding or encouraging such practices by financial institutions has been a source of significant debate. Accusations of overreach and the politicization of regulatory powers underscore a deep mistrust in government intentions and actions. Conservatives argue for a regulatory environment that safeguards against actual threats without encroaching upon the civil liberties of individuals or the operational independence of businesses.

In navigating these turbulent waters, the call for transparency and impartiality becomes ever louder. Conservatives demand clear guidelines and justifications for actions taken against MAGA supporters, both by the government and by private entities. The arbitrary nature of some of these actions only serves to fuel suspicions and undermine faith in the institutions responsible for upholding the rule of law.

Through it all, the strength and resilience of the conservative movement remain evident. Faced with adversity, conservatives continue to champion the values of individual liberty, free speech, and fair treatment under the law. The response to these challenges is not to retreat but to reaffirm the importance of dialogue, legal recourse, and peaceful advocacy.

In conclusion, the scrutiny of banks and MAGA supporters within the context of the Biden administration’s policies serves as a reminder of the ongoing debate over the soul of our nation. As we move forward, it is imperative that all actions—by individuals, businesses, and government agencies—are guided by the principles of justice, fairness, and respect for the constitutional rights that define us as Americans. The path ahead must be navigated with care to ensure that our responses to the challenges of today do not compromise the freedoms we hold dear tomorrow.

What are YOUR thoughts on the banks?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.

The post Banks, MAGA Supporters, and the Biden Administration appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Fact Check: No, The Gateway Pundit is Not Losing Its Audience — We Continue to be One of the MOST VISITED News Sites in America Today

Yesterday, the news of the Gateway Pundit’s bankruptcy filing was released to the public.

As outlined in yesterday’s statement, this decision was made for business reasons. However, for our dedicated readers and trusted staff, there are no planned changes. We remain committed to delivering the same high-quality daily news and journalism to America today.

The mainstream media began reporting this news in a feverish way with glee and half-truths. They all had their erroneous spin on the filing. They were misunderstanding what was going on, and simply speculating as to what our motives were, what the facts were, and why it was happening.

One of the lies they started repeating in their coverage was that the traffic for the Gateway Pundit has gone down or plummeted.

In many reports they tried to claim that our traffic has gone down 62% since 2020, an outright lie. The Gateway Pundit is completely transparent about our site traffic. We link to it on every page, it’s a blue button at the bottom right of every page labelled “TGP Stats”, and it’s through a service called StatCounter.com.

The art and science of measuring website traffic is not precise, but across every reliable system it shows the same thing: our Gateway Pundit traffic is substantially higher than in 2020.

Here’s what the year-to-year 2020-2024 data shows, and as you can see it does NOT show a decline in either site traffic or in unique visits to the site:

The mainstream media has based this lie on the way that online websites’ traffic is measured. One such service is called ComScore. ComScore is similar to StatCounter, and it requires website administrators to place a code or script on each page so that traffic can be counted. In 2020, TGP removed that code because we did not trust their reports. So today ComScore shows that our traffic is substantially down, even though that is not true – we removed their tracking code.

ComScore’s statistics are then used by a hard-left blog to track and harass right-wing publications and journalists; one is known as “The Righting.” They published a story that was based entirely off of the ComScore data, showing the wrong statistics and facts. This source was then used by left-leaning media outlets to report these things as verified third-party facts.

All they did was copy and paste the wrong data, from the wrong service, to support a wrong conclusion: that TGP’s traffic was down when, in fact, it is actually substantially up.

TGP also uses Google Analytics to track our site traffic, and Google reports the same trends as StatCounter, even though they don’t provide a public link to the data: TGP traffic is nearly double that of 2020. Google Analytics proves that page-views to the GP site have gone from between 24-32 million views to between 55-87 million page-views.

Here’s our 2020 Google Analytics report:

And here’s our 2024 Google Analytics report. Google changed the way they display their reports, so it’s a little harder to compare the two, but if you look at the total page-views, and the total unique users, you can find the key data.

Can you guess whether the left-wing mainstream media is reporting the truth that traffic is substantially up, or whether they spread the disinformation that it is substantially down? I’m sure you know that they chose the lie, instead of the truth, because in their minds the emotional agenda is more important than the facts.

We reached out to several reporters involved in promoting this disinformation and asked them to correct their data and amend their stories.

To their credit, Mediaite’s Alexander Griffing fixed his story to at least show that the traffic numbers were in dispute. He did this quickly and was a complete professional about the matter.

Mediaite’s Alexander Griffing

And then there was the Atlantic’s Paul Fahri. He wrote in the “Atlantic” that the Gateway Pundit traffic was down by over half. This, as I’ve explained, is simply not true.

We reached out to Paul and asked him to correct his story. We showed him the evidence, we explained the situation, we said surely at least he would want to explain that the numbers were reasonably in dispute.

Surely a journalist with years working at the Washington Post would want his readers to have the right information, have the right facts, and draw the right conclusions from those facts.

Fahri told us he didn’t care if it was true or not, he wasn’t going to update the article. He told us to go take it up with the source he received the information from, and maybe just take it up with ComScore themselves.

The Atlantic’s Paul Fahri, who does not correct factual errors in his reporting.

Here’s Paul’s response, you can see how readers get left with disinformation and outright lies in mainstream reporting when you have reporters as clearly arrogant as Paul:

NPR of course repeated the same lying line about our traffic being down. It’s not even worth trying to engage with those hard-left zealots committed to disinformation.

Instead of correcting their errors, mainstream journalists revel in their errors. Instead of doing their jobs to get the story right all the time, they simply push the agenda and ignore the facts. This is why America no longer reads these partisan disinformation outlets. This is why America fell out of love with mainstream journalism.

This is the truth why the Gateway Pundit is getting more site traffic than ever before. Even though we are constantly harassed with lawfare, even though the government is trying to push us off all social media platforms in a case now being decided before the Supreme Court, even though our ad platforms are attacked and even our advertisers are harassed by insane left-wing anti-free-speech zealots, despite everything they throw at the Gateway Pundit, we’re doing better than ever.

Outside the Supreme Court after oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri with co-plaintiffs Jay Bhattacharya, Jill Hines, and Jim Hoft, March 18, 2024.

When I founded the Gateway Pundit, I had no idea we would get to this point. I had no idea our growth would be this phenomenal. But I had one overriding belief: that if we told the truth, and reported what other people were afraid to report… that it would all work out and that people would read us and support us.

I am enormously proud that the Gateway Pundit and our amazing team of journalists have taken the national lead on reporting about the unconstitutional COVID lockdowns and massive state misinformation about the virus, the 2020 election fraud and cover-up, the January 6th show trials and political prisoners, endless Biden scandals, and so much more.

Thank you for making the Gateway Pundit the number one source of news and opinion journalism in America.

The post Fact Check: No, The Gateway Pundit is Not Losing Its Audience — We Continue to be One of the MOST VISITED News Sites in America Today appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

FDA WARNS: Deadly Virus Found in MILK, Shoppers on NOTICE | Beyond the Headlines

FDA WARNS: Deadly Virus Found in MILK, Shoppers on NOTICE | Beyond the Headlines

Recently, it was revealed that now, “remnants” of the Bird Flu are showing up in milk. However, according to the FDA, pasteurization — a process seen by some to be beneficial, and others not so much — apparently “inactivates the virus”. Kind of like the vaccine? Do you trust the FDA after the last 4 years of health misinformation?

Elijah Schaffer discusses all this and more on today’s Beyond the Headlines!

The post FDA WARNS: Deadly Virus Found in MILK, Shoppers on NOTICE | Beyond the Headlines appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.