Month: June 2024

Note: The information provided here or in any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice. Gateway Pundit benefits from purchases made through sponsored messages such as the one below.

A combination of strong trends in precious metals prices and growing anxiety over the nation’s economic future has driven many Americans to invest in physical precious metals. Central banks are quietly buying as much as possible to protect their vast assets so why shouldn’t average Americans do the same with their wealth and retirement?

The surge in interest has sparked precious metals companies both new and old to scramble for a piece of the pie. But as Jonathan Rose, CEO of Genesis Gold Group, recently noted during an interview, buying gold and silver is not like buying other commodities.

“The prices being charged for precious metals, especially for self-directed IRAs, can range from reasonable all the way to absolutely bonkers,” he said. “It’s very sad whenever I see the details of deals Americans were pressured into making because I know they were ripped off by predatory gold companies.”

In the world of numismatic precious metals investments, there are many companies that charge triple-digit margin percentages to drive insane profits. The gap between wholesale and retail can be so great that “unburying” clients of “Big Gold” companies can be nearly impossible.

Genesis Gold Group is a faith-driven precious metals company. As such, they operate transparently and with integrity when they help Americans roll over or transfer their retirement accounts into a Genesis Gold IRA.

“There are certain signs I tell people to watch for if they’re engaging with any precious metals company,” Rose said. “The biggest alarm bell is when companies offer ‘free’ silver in exchange for their purchases. ‘Free’ silver offers are a sure sign the company is dramatically overcharging for their metals.”

Another differentiator with Genesis Gold Group versus other companies is in the metals mix. Companies tend to stuff the bars and coins with the highest profit margins into their gold IRAs.

Genesis Gold Group works very closely with their clients to put together the best metals mix for their individual situations. That often means a combination of bullion, numismatics, and utility metals that allows their clients the flexibility they’ll need in the future.

“We spend a ton of effort making sure our clients have all the information they need to make an informed decision,” Rose said. “An educated client is the best client which is why we take time to fill any knowledge gaps before the relationship begins.”

The company offers a free, definitive gold guide that walks potential clients through the unique process Genesis Gold Group has crafted over the years.

Arguably the most important attribute that differentiates Genesis Gold Group from “Big Gold” companies is the speed in which their clients can receive their physical metals through distributions or account changes. It can take weeks or even months for the vast majority of precious metals companies to move metals from IRA depositories to their clients.

“We are very proud that we can get metals in the hands of our customers in just a few days when they close their accounts or take distributions,” Rose said. “That’s particularly appealing to our clients considering the state of affairs in America.

“If and when turmoil hits, we want those who have trusted Genesis Gold Group to take possession of their metals quickly when they need it most.”

Reach out to Genesis Gold Group today to receive the Definitive Gold Guide and learn more about the safe haven of physical precious metals.

The post Christian Gold Company CEO: “It Makes a Difference WHO You Work With” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A couple in West Virginia allegedly forced their adopted black children to work as slaves and were locked in a barn, according to a police report.

The New York Post reported Jeanne Kay Whitefeather, 62, and Donald Ray Lantz have been charged with over a dozen charges that include using children in forced labor, human trafficking of a minor, and child neglect.

Whitefeather and Lantz were first arrested in 2023 after a wellness check led to the discovery that two of their adopted children were living in “deplorable conditions” inside a shed.

An indictment against Lantz and Whitefeather alleges the couple violated the children’s human rights by forcing them into labor.

The couple appeared in the Kanawha County court on Tuesday and pleaded not guilty.

Wealthy white couple allegedly kept their black adopted children as slaves, locked them in barn: report https://t.co/5XK8wuNdxU pic.twitter.com/wLx4HWTF87

— New York Post (@nypost) June 25, 2024

Per Yahoo News:

A white couple in Sissonville, West Virginia, faced additional charges of human sex trafficking and neglect after reportedly confining their five adoptive Black children in a barn for forced labor.

According to WV Metro News, this is the second time the couple has been arrested on charges relating to minor children. Donald Ray Lantz, 63, and Jeanne Kay Whitefeather, 62, appeared in Kanawha County court on Tuesday and entered not guilty pleas to over a dozen new charges, which include human trafficking of a minor, using a minor in forced labor, and child neglect posing significant risk of serious bodily harm or death.

Lantz and Whitefeather were initially arrested, with their bonds set at $200,000, following a separate incident in October 2023. At the time, a wellness check was conducted at their home when someone discovered that two of the five adoptive children were living in “deplorable conditions” while locked in a shed behind the couple’s home.

According to the indictment, the couple allegedly violated the children’s human rights by forcing them to work based on their skin color.

Wealthy couple, Donald Lantz, 63, and Jeanne Whitefeather, 62, have been accused of subjecting their adopted black children to forced labor and confinement.https://t.co/GW9S3wSYF5https://t.co/cRMiRXxTMv pic.twitter.com/SZcEchg1tb

— observe_ct (@CtObserve) June 26, 2024

The post West Virginia Couple Who Adopted Five Black Children Arrested for Allegedly Locking Children in Shed and Using Them as Slaves appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a high-profile case, the Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the Biden administration’s communications with social media companies violated the First Amendment. The lawsuit, filed by the states of Missouri and Louisiana along with several individuals, challenges the federal government’s efforts to influence content moderation on social media platforms, arguing it amounts to unconstitutional censorship of conservative viewpoints​​.

During Monday’s session, the justices appeared divided but leaned toward skepticism about the plaintiffs’ claims. The case hinges on whether the Biden administration’s actions, described as efforts to combat misinformation about COVID-19 and the 2020 election, constitute coercion or simply the use of the government’s “bully pulpit” to persuade​​.

Free speech is gone… pic.twitter.com/UbzsrgCd5D

— Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) June 26, 2024

Louisiana Solicitor General J. Benjamin Aguinaga argued that the administration’s tactics included persistent badgering and implied threats of regulatory action, which overstepped the boundaries of permissible government influence. He highlighted emails between officials and Facebook as evidence of “constant pestering” and undue pressure​..

The government’s defense, presented by Principal Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher, maintained that its interactions with social media were aimed at protecting public health and democratic integrity, and did not amount to coercion. Fletcher argued that the communications were part of routine government efforts to persuade the public and that coercive action was not taken against any platform​​.

Today’s SCOTUS decision makes it clear we urgently need to defend our God-given right to free expression. It’s time to fight back and pass my Free Speech Protection Act so the government can no longer cloak itself in secrecy to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans.… https://t.co/RB7MCRXhWp

— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) June 26, 2024

Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan posed hypotheticals about the government’s role in addressing public safety threats, such as dangerous social media challenges or doxxing incidents. Jackson suggested that government warnings to social media companies about public health emergencies are necessary and not inherently coercive. Kagan expressed concern over setting a broad precedent that might impede necessary government actions to protect citizens​ ​.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, however, focused on the potential overreach of executive influence. Alito questioned whether the administration would use similar tactics with traditional media, implying that social media companies might be more susceptible to government pressure due to their regulatory environment​.

The case, Murthy v. Missouri, raises significant questions about the balance between government intervention and free speech rights in the digital age. A lower court had previously issued an injunction restricting government communications with social media companies, which was later narrowed by an appeals court. The Supreme Court’s final decision, expected by the end of its term in June, will clarify the extent to which government officials can engage with social media platforms without infringing on First Amendment rights​​.

This ruling will have far-reaching implications for how misinformation is managed on social media and the limits of government influence over private sector content moderation. As the justices deliberate, the balance between combating harmful misinformation and protecting free speech remains a contentious and pivotal issue.

The post Supreme Court Skeptical of Limiting Biden Administration’s Social Media Contacts appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) trolled outgoing anti-gun nut and insurrectionist Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), telling him he’ll miss their “informal chitchats” when he leaves office at the end of the year.

Along with the tweet, Massie posted a clip of himself confronting Jamaal Bowman during an unhinged screaming meltdown over guns in the halls of Congress.

Democrat Bowman wants to take your guns – your only protection as crime soars to record levels in Democrat cities across the country, like New York.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Bowman lost his bid for reelection for New York’s 16th Congressional District on Tuesday.

JUST IN: Hamas Sympathizer and Insurrectionist Rep. Jamaal Bowman Loses Reelection Bid

“I’m going to miss our informal chitchats in the hallways,” Massie quipped at Bowman’s misfortune of being eliminated in his primary election.

In the video, Bowman is seen screaming like a psychopath and putting his hands on Rep. Massie days after a mass shooting inside of a Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee, by a manifesto toting leftist transgender.

“More guns lead to more deaths. Look at the data!” screamed Bowman after Massie told him, “You know, there’s never been a school shooting in a school that allows teachers to carry.” “Carry guns?” Bowman screamed like a panicked schizophrenic before Massie asked him to sponsor his bill to allow teachers to carry firearms and protect students from violent, mentally ill individuals who seek to harm others.

Bowman continued screaming at Massie and grabbing at him as he lost his mind about how he “worked in a school for 20 years.” However, Bowman never was never involved in any school shootings. “I’m not talking to you anymore. You’re just screaming,” said Massie as he was speaking to the press, repeatedly interrupted by Bowman.

I’m going to miss our informal chitchats in the hallways.pic.twitter.com/3ZRKzkwIdo

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) June 26, 2024

The Gateway Pundit previously reported on this clip of Bowman screaming at Republican lawmakers as they exited the Capitol.

While this was a great defeat for one of the radical left Squad members and Democrat insurrectionists, it seems we have traded one anti-gun Democrat for another who will vote down party lines and attempt to sabotage President Trump’s second term.

“Latimer is seen as a shoo-in for the general election in the deep-blue district, which would have backed Joe Biden under the current lines by 45 points in 2020. Former Scarsdale Mayor Miriam Flisser was unopposed for the Republican nomination,” CNN reports.

The post LOL: “I’m Going to Miss Our Informal Chitchats in The Hallways” – Rep. Thomas Massie Trolls Insurrectionist Jamaal Bowman After He Loses Reelection Bid With Flashback of His UNHINGED Anti-Gun Rant (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Anas Saleh was arrested after the NYPD released his photo following disturbing behavior following an anti-Israel protest./Image: NYPD.

The Gateway Pundit reported that after leaving a protest outside an exhibit honoring Oct. 7 victims, a group of masked anti-Israel protestors took over a New York City subway car and demanded Jews identify themselves.

The Nova Exhibition is a powerful and moving tribute to the lives lost at the hands of Hamas terrorists as they stormed the peaceful musical festival to murder, rape, and kidnap the young people attending the event.

As the Hamas supporters entered a NYC subway car, one of the masked protestors told any “Zionists” on the train to raise their hands before warning them, “This is your chance to get out.”

According to The New York Post, after a manhunt that included police sharing a wanted poster with his face on it, Anas Saleh turned himself in early Wednesday.

Wanted poster of Anas Saleh released by the NYPD

According to sources, Saleh was charged with coercion.

Hamas supporters demand Jews identify themselves on NY subway car. Image/@AvivaKlompas/X

The incident unfolded after protestors entered the train, and the suspect demanded, “Repeat after me…Raise your hand if you’re a Zionist.”

His comrades mindlessly repeated his chant.

He then added, “This is your chance to get out.”

It did not appear that anyone raised their hand, and he continued, “Okay, no Zionists, we’re good.”

Watch:

The mindless mob on a NYC subway car: “Raise your hands if you’re a Zionist. This is your chance to get out.”

That’s an explicit threat @NYPDnews @NYCMayor pic.twitter.com/zmDpsx2hYN

— Aviva Klompas (@AvivaKlompas) June 11, 2024

From The Post:

Harassment and coercion are crimes. We are thankful that the NYPD is acting to hold this perpetrator accountable for his actions,” Liora Rez, executive director of StopAntisemitism, said in a statement after Saleh was identified.

“It will now be the responsibility of the district attorney to ensure that this antisemite is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, which all New Yorkers expect will be with the vocal and visible support of Mayor Eric Adams and all duly sworn officials of the City of New York.

“The public antisemitism we are seeing on the subways and streets of New York City does not only affect Jews. antisemitism degrades the lives of all Americans here in New York and is antithetical to our values as a nation,” she added.”

The post Masked Anti-Israel Protester Who Took Over NY Subway Car and Demanded Jews Identify Themselves and Warned ‘This is Your Chance to Get Out’ Turns Himself In After Manhunt appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

By Wayne Allyn Root

President Trump doesn’t need much advice in life. He is one of the most successful, wealthy, famous and celebrated human beings in the history of mankind.

But I do know a thing or two about debates. I’ve never lost one in my life. And two stand out because of the unfriendly circumstances I faced.

Back in 1980, I played Ronald Reagan in the Columbia University presidential debate against Jimmy Carter- in a college filled with radical socialists, Marxists and communists who hated Reagan. After the debate the student body voted. I won the debate with 75% of the vote.

Back in 2008, I debated on national TV for the Libertarian Presidential nomination against a US Senator (Mike Gravel), US Congressman (Bob Barr), and a dozen of the most well-known and beloved Libertarian leaders in party history. I was a completely unknown Las Vegas sports gambler, never in politics a day in my life, and booed unmercifully by the crowd because I was a lifelong Republican-conservative. But I won the debate so decisively, I was voted onto the Libertarian Presidential ticket.

So, here’s my advice to President Trump…

First, this debate is about one audience only: WOMEN. That’s who you need to reach. Men don’t matter. You’re already winning a landslide with men. A majority of American men- white men, black men, Latino men- are in your corner.

Aim everything you say at women.

You need to win over women- in particular independents and so-called “mama bears” (women with children and grandchildren).

Women don’t like harsh words or attacks. However, women all understand the word “liar.” Women don’t like liars. Brand Biden again and again as a liar. He is the President of “The Liars Club.”

You can open the debate by pointing out that in the debate four years ago, Joe Biden lied about his son Hunter’s laptop and claimed it was “Russian misinformation” when in fact it was real- and it showcased corruption by the Biden Crime Family, as well as unimagined levels of drug abuse, sex abuse and debauchery against women.

Point out Biden’s election to the presidency was based on that lie. Biden is the President of “The Liars Club.”

Biden’s lies are damaging America, destroying the American Dream, wiping out the great American middle class, and putting our children in danger at the hands of millions of illegal foreign invaders.

Go back to that theme again and again. Biden is a proven liar. Biden is President of “The Liars Club.” Biden’s lies are damaging the lives of America’s women and children.

Here are the winning topics that affect women and children the most. Keep coming back to these again and again. That’s the key to winning a debate: What the moderators ask you, DOES NOT MATTER. You control the debate. No matter what they ask, you change the topic and keep coming back to the topics that you want to discuss.

These winning topics are…

The economy and inflation. There was no inflation under Trump. Biden’s policies have produced the worst inflation of our lifetimes. Those are facts. The debate is over. Biden and Democrats own inflation. Everyone can see it with their own eyes. Biden’s inflation is hurting you, your family, your children. You can see it in your pocketbook.

Jobs? What jobs? Every job created by Biden has been for illegal aliens. There has not been one net job gain for American citizens. More lies by Biden.

The open border and the explosion of murders and rapes of innocent American women and children by illegal aliens welcomed in by Biden and Democrats. Again, we can see it with our own eyes. Biden and Democrats can’t hide it. It’s getting worse by the day.

Memorize the names of recent victims. Say their names out loud. They are the victims of Biden’s open border disaster. The next victim could be your daughter, wife, mother or sister.

Close with, “Biden and Democrats don’t care how many innocent American women and children die at the hands of foreign invaders, as long as they get more Democrat voters.”

World War 3 is coming. Now we are allowing Ukraine to bomb beaches in Crimea, killing innocent Russian children, with US-made missiles. Your sons and daughters are going to be cannon fodder at the Russian Front, if Joe Biden and Democrats get their way. They’re already making plans to re-institute the draft. You need to say, “With President Trump back in the White House, there will be no draft, there will be no World War 3. Your sons and daughters are safe.”

Lastly, bring up transgender brainwashing in schools, and mentally-ill men wanting to use women’s bathrooms, and play on women’s teams, and take away women’s sports scholarships, and dress in women’s locker-rooms. These are issues all “mama bears” can agree on. You can say, “This madness ends when I become President again.”

Keep coming back to these issues that appeal to women, again and again. The questions posed by the debate moderators don’t matter. You take control of the debate. You present the messages you want to present.

Lastly, presentation is everything.

Women hate angry men. Present your case with emotion, passion and compassion, not anger. Wear your heart on your sleeve. Show America the President Trump I know- the one with a big heart who cares about American women and children whose lives are being damaged, destroyed, or cut short by the dangerous, reckless and deadly policies of Biden and Democrats.

President Trump, if you take this advice, the night is yours. Joe Biden’s career will end on Thursday night. Within weeks, Biden will announce he is stepping down. Democrats will install a new candidate at the convention. But it will be too late. The Trump landslide will crush anyone they put on the ticket as a last-minute replacement.

HOT OFF THE PRESSES: Watch Wayne’s brand new TV Show, “The ROOT Reaction” weeknights at 10 PM ET/7 PM Pacific on Real America’s Voice TV, and Wayne’s weekend “America’s Top Ten Countdown” on Saturdays at Noon ET/9 AM PT on Real America’s Voice TV. Watch at RealAmericasVoice.com, or at Rumble, Roku, Pluto, Apple, Dish TV Ch 219, or go to RootforAmerica.com to watch.

The post WAYNE ROOT: President Trump, Make the Debate About America’s Women and Children. That’s Your Only Audience. appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a significant blow to Soros-backed Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón’s administration, Diana Teran, one of his top officials tasked with maintaining ‘ethics and integrity,’ is facing 11 serious felony charges.

Teran, who was heavily involved in managing critical law enforcement databases, is accused of illegally accessing over 1,600 peace officer files, according to a report by FOX 11.

Teran’s case is linked to an incident involving Joseph Iniguez, who was Gascón’s chief of staff at the time of his controversial arrest in December 2021 on a traffic violation and suspicion of drunken driving.

Iniguez, who has since been promoted to chief deputy district attorney, was allegedly recorded clashing with police officers and interrupting their investigation while under the influence of alcohol.

In the video, Iniguez can be heard asking the deputy about running the plates. Iniguez confidently told the officer, “You pulled over the wrong person. Let me tell you.”

The New York Post reported:

Newly released video shows Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon’s top aide arrested after interrupting police who pulled over his then-fiance during a traffic stop on their way home from a wedding in 2021.

Joseph Iniguez, the current No. 2 prosecutor in Los Angeles, was riding shotgun when police pulled the couple over for a suspected traffic violation.

Iniguez was Gascon’s chief of staff at the time, and last year he received a $10,000 settlement from Azusa after he sued over the incident, alleging a federal civil rights violation.

He has since been promoted to chief deputy district attorney.

Joseph Iniguez reportedly threatened to place an Azusa Police Department officer on the LADA Brady list, a collection of information that prosecutors know about a department member that could be used to impeach them or is exculpatory, following his arrest. This incident subsequently prompted the investigation that implicated Teran.

WATCH:



On Tuesday, FOX News’ Bill Melugin obtained the arrest affidavit detailing the case against Teran.

According to the affidavit reviewed by The Gateway Pundit, Teran committed multiple violations of Penal Code section 502(c) related to unauthorized access and use of data from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s computers, computer system, and computer network.

According to the affidavit, Teran, while working at the  Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office (LADA) in 2021, accessed and used sensitive data from LASD’s systems that she had previously accessed during her employment in 2018.

The data in question included information from LASD peace officer personnel files, internal emails, and documents concerning multiple peace officers. The investigation revealed that Teran’s actions constituted 11 violations of the Penal Code.

Furthermore, the affidavit highlights that Teran was able to identify 33 deputy sheriffs who were subjects of administrative investigations and civil service proceedings, despite only a few such cases being discovered by the LADA’s Data Analysis and Research Unit over several years. It is also suggested that some of the documents provided by Teran to external parties were directly sourced from LASD data files.

FOX News reported:

Before joining Gascon’s office, Teran worked in oversight for the sheriff’s department and had access to more than 1,600 confidential files on members of law enforcement, as well as documents related to internal affairs investigations.

She left the sheriff’s department in 2018, but after joining Gascon’s office in 2021, allegedly continued to use material from those files, which she is now accused of illegally taking and accessing.

“Teran repeatedly used data from those LASD personnel files and internal emails and documents in a surreptitious attempt to add peace officer names to LADA’s Brady and ORWITS databases.”

Teran’s defense attorney has said he believes she will beat the state’s charges.

Iniguez has not been charged or accused of wrongdoing in connection with the case against Teran.

You can read the full arrest affidavit here.

The post Soros-Backed California DA Gascon’s ‘Ethics and Integrity’ Top Official Faces 11 Felony Charges appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Outside the Supreme Court after oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri with co-plaintiffs Jay Bhattacharya, Jill Hines, and Jim Hoft, March 18, 2020.

The United States Supreme Court released their truly shocking opinion on Wednesday morning in the Murthy v. Missouri case – the most important free speech case in the last century. 

In a stunning 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Biden Administration’s policy of deleting, suppressing, and deplatforming specific people, topics, and ideas is immune from suit, leaving no one able to challenge it in court. Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch were in the minority.

The ruling, written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, contained the following key decision: “Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have established Article III standing to seek an injunction against any defendant.”

In sum, the court ruled that the two types of parties, states and individuals harmed by these government policies, do not have ‘standing’ to sue. This case was procedurally related to the request for a preliminary injunction for the government to stop the censorship regime while the case was going on.

This decision will make the trial court action in this case more difficult but, insiders say, not impossible. “It’s a horrible decision, but the underlying case at the lower court marches forward. The Gateway Pundit is dedicated to fighting the government for the free speech rights of everyone, we are committed to ultimate victory,” said John Burns, General Counsel for the Gateway Pundit.

Following today’s ruling several key figures who brought the case forward weighed in on the SCOTUS opinion.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey tweeted that he will head back to the district court to obtain more discovery.

AG Andrew Bailey: My office filed suit against dozens of officials in the federal government to stop the biggest violation of the First Amendment in our nation’s history. The record is clear: the deep state pressured and coerced social media companies to take down truthful speech simply because it was conservative. Today’s ruling does not dispute that. My rallying cry to disappointed Americans is this: Missouri is not done. We are going back to the district court to obtain more discovery in order to root out Joe Biden’s vast censorship enterprise once and for all.

My office filed suit against dozens of officials in the federal government to stop the biggest violation of the First Amendment in our nation’s history.

The record is clear: the deep state pressured and coerced social media companies to take down truthful speech simply because…

— Attorney General Andrew Bailey (@AGAndrewBailey) June 26, 2024

US Senator Eric Schmitt from Missouri, who launched the case as Missouri Attorney General, released the following statement.

Sen. Eric Schmitt: Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Murthy v. Missouri case exposed nearly every part of the Biden Administration’s Orwellian “vast censorship enterprise.”

I was proud to file this case as Missouri’s AG. Justice Alito said not only was Biden’s actions were unconstitutional under very well-established Supreme Court precedent, but also that this case is one of the most important free speech cases to reach the Supreme Court in years.

Now, Congress must step up and do our job to make sure Americans’ right to freedom of speech is not eroded any further.

I call on Congress to pass my Censorship Accountability Act and my COLLUDE Act immediately.

Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Murthy v. Missouri case exposed nearly every part of the Biden Administration’s Orwellian “vast censorship enterprise.”

I was proud to file this case as Missouri’s AG. Justice Alito said not only was Biden’s actions were unconstitutional…

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) June 26, 2024

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill released this statement today following the ruling.

AG Liz Murrill: Today’s decision in Murthy v Missouri is unfortunate and disappointing. A majority of the Supreme Court gives a free pass to the federal government to threaten tech platforms into censorship and suppression of speech that is indisputably protected by the First Amendment. The majority waves off the worst government coercion scheme in history.

Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch rightly reached the merits and had no problem finding that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits.

Though this is not the outcome we hoped for, I’ll keep fighting to defend and protect our rights.

Today’s decision in Murthy v Missouri is unfortunate and disappointing. A majority of the Supreme Court gives a free pass to the federal government to threaten tech platforms into censorship and suppression of speech that is indisputably protected by the First Amendment. The… pic.twitter.com/v2BQHXcrRM

— Attorney General Liz Murrill (@AGLizMurrill) June 26, 2024

Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, who initiated this investigation with Eric Schmitt while they were both serving as Attorneys General of their state, released this statement and a warning.

Governor Jeff Landry: It is high time for Congress to implement some standards and statutes the Court must follow.

For months, government officials colluded with social media to suppress Americans’ free speech. I agree with Justice Alito, the Court is unjustifiably ignoring the serious threat to our freedom of speech.

This ruling is an erosion of our freedom of speech and of our First Amendment rights.

It is high time for Congress to implement some standards and statutes the Court must follow.

For months, government officials colluded with social media to suppress Americans’ free speech. I agree with Justice Alito, the Court is unjustifiably ignoring the serious threat to our… https://t.co/peH38fg5dS

— Governor Jeff Landry (@LAGovJeffLandry) June 26, 2024

Governor Landry then posted this warning: “What is clear is the majority does not grasp the dangerous slope on which the Court is now placing this country. If states don’t have a right to speak up for their citizens, then who does?

What is clear is the majority does not grasp the dangerous slope on which the Court is now placing this country.

If states don’t have a right to speak up for their citizens, then who does?

— Governor Jeff Landry (@LAGovJeffLandry) June 26, 2024

The post Reaction to Murthy v. Missouri Ruling: Missouri AG Bailey Vows to Go Back to District Court to Obtain More Discovery – Gov. Landry Issues Warning on “Dangerous Slope” Ahead appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A guest post by Manuel P. Asensio – Chairman of St. Johns County Presidential Republican Executive Committee

Manuel P. Asensio

To save our Constitution, we must unite and insist that President Donald J. Trump confront John Roberts, the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court and chief executive officer of the US Judicial Conference in Washington, D.C.

The Roberts Court, April 23, 2021
-Photograph by Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

President Trump beat Hillary, but he did not beat the alliances Roberts had with former president Obama. Now President Trump must end Roberts’s reign of personal corruption in America.

It is at the US Judicial Conference where Roberts and the federal judges rig the nation’s trial and appeal processes to suit their own personal interests. It is here where the federal judges have taken over the Judicial Conduct Act and the Rules Enactment Act – our two greatest legislatively created laws. Congress specifically created these laws to protect you and your family’s peace of mind and property from corrupt federal judges and the lawyers they use to get what they want.

Congress explicitly designed these two anti-judicial corruption laws to prevent federal judges from stepping outside of their very narrow constitutionally prescribed lane. These are the two laws that the president and Congress created to keep judges in their proper place and lawyers in their place. Most lawyers have never heard of or much less ever worked with the US Judicial Conference, the Judicial Conduct Act, and the Rules Enactment Act. The reason for this is simple. These two laws are bad for the business of America’s judicial industrial complex and good for freedom.

The Judicial Conduct Act and the Rules Enactment Act are meant to prevent judges and lawyers from taking control of due process and the rule of law in America. These two laws are the cornerstones of preserving, protecting, and perpetuating the Constitution’s great values of independence, liberty, and principles of the separation and limits on the powers of government.

To save our Constitution, we must discard the notion that lawyers have an interest in defending our Constitution. Without corrupt lawyers, there would be no organized judicial corruption. It is the lawyers who have sold us a bill of goods that federal judges get to regulate the Judicial Conduct Act and the Rules Enactment Act and then rule over the Constitution. It is the lawyers that have joined together with the federal judges to create a so called “post-modern society.” This post-modern is nonsense but good business for lawyers. This is why federal judges have become metaphors for pretentiousness, hypocrisy, collective denial, or hollowness – we all see the absurdity of judges and lawyers pretending to be straight when they are not.

Post-modern philosophy is not a high-minded idea lawyers created to improve American society or wealth. Post-modern philosophy is not any improvement on America’s constitutional capitalist democratic republic or the secular wisdom of Judeo-Christian values and principles. It is the same evil Fascist and Communist ideas created by Giovanni Gentile and Karl Marx under a different label. It is the devilish idea that the government possesses divine wisdom and infinite knowledge. Post-modern philosophy is an evil judicial scheme to destroy our Constitution’s rule of law. Without vigorous prosecutions under the Judicial Conduct Act. Without proper administration of the Judicial Conduct Act and the Rules Enactment Act, the Supremacy Clause’s declaration that the Constitution is US Supreme Law for the entire nation is meaningless.

To save our Constitution, we must accept that it was Roberts, our 17th chief justice of the United States, and President Barrack Obama, our 44th president, who opened the floodgates of organized judicial corruption. Roberts came into power in 2005. Obama appeared in 2009. Together they pulverized the Judicial Conduct Act and the Rules Enactment Act and destroyed the rule of law. Obama violated his oath to defend the Constitution. Roberts violated his oath to administer justice in accordance with the Constitution.

Roberts’s fabrication of executive power for himself is worse than our Founding Fathers ever imagined possible. He has taken control of the Constitution and the two laws whose sole and exclusive purpose is to regulate organized judicial corruption. This is the reason lawyers protect and glorify Roberts’s silly buffoonery. He is money in the bank.

President Trump’s lawyers are following the post-modern philosophy script. They are acting as if the terrible thing judges can repair through normal appeals – this is the great lie that has allowed Roberts to turn himself into an executive powerhouse. This is the same lie that President Trump’s White House lawyers used to persuade Vice President Mike Pence to reject the wisdom and truth of the Electoral Commission Act of 1877’s Constitutional Compromise and to take the verification of the 2020 election’s faithfulness to the Constitution into his own hands.

Organized federal judicial corruption at the US Judicial Conference has brought Giovanni Gentile’s Fascist ideas and Karl Marx’s Communist manifesto into the center of the American government. We must insist President Trump file a Consideration to confront Roberts and save the Constitution and rule of law.

To get further information on the St. Johns Presidential Executive Committee’s Federal Judiciary Policy Plan, visit www.stjohnsgop.org. You can contact us at info@stjohnsgop.org or leave your comments on our hotline at (863) WINRED-1 [(863) 946-7331]. Our office number is (561) 946-1000.

Manuel P. Asensio and Robert A. Harris are co-authors of this article and the co-chairmen of the St. Johns Presidential Executive Committee. The Committee believes it has the information that President Donald J. Trump needs to file a Consideration at the US Judicial Conference before any judge enters any further judicial conclusions in his cases. President Trump’s Consideration will address both Republican and Democratic Parties’ federal judiciary policy towards the federal judges that allow them to violate our Constitution. This unconstitutional undemocratic bipartisanship is the cause of organized judicial corruption. The Trump Consideration must come before the American People and Congress. Under the US Constitution and US law, a Consideration at the US Judicial Conference is how President Trump’s cases belong. This is a matter of plain and simple truth.

Asensio founded Asensio & Company, the first Wall Street firm dedicated to fighting corruption. His phenomenally successful investigations uncovered fraud harming investors and improved capital markets. As a result, he became known as a pioneer of information arbitrage. In 2016, Asensio founded the Institute of Judicial Conduct to research corruption in the regulation of the federal judiciary and the administration of family liberty and individual rights. His congressional campaign brings this wealth of knowledge and experience to the political arena.

A conservative Christian Republican, Asensio has experience with left-wing government takeovers in Cuba, Venezuela, and the United States of America. He earned his undergraduate degree from the Wharton School of Business and his graduate degree from Harvard Business School.

Asensio was born in Cuba and fled communism at six years old, two weeks after the Bay of Pigs invasion. His parents taught him since childhood to embrace conservative values and to fight for individual dignity and independence. Caridad Asensio, Asensio’s mother, is cofounder of the Caridad Center, Florida’s largest free health clinic and one of the largest in the nation. She is a member of the Florida Women’s Hall of Fame and a recipient of the National Jefferson Award.

 

The post Americans Can Save Our Constitution From Organized Federal Judicial Corruption—Here’s How appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer, one of the most hated so-called Republicans in the state of Arizona, revealed on Monday that he will vote for Joe Biden in the 2024 election.

Richer came under fire after running in 2020 and telling voters during campaign stops and stump speeches that his predecessor, former Maricopa County Recorder Adrian Fontes, was a “criminal” and that election laws weren’t being followed. However, he vigorously against an audit of the 2020 Presidential Election and various other election integrity efforts.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Stephen Richer was even exposed by his former colleague, Steve Chucri, for not trusting Dominion enough to be used in another election.

Richer later saw early voting in Maricopa County during the 2022 election, where the race was stolen from Kari Lake through vote tabulating machine failures that disenfranchised Republicans on election day and phony mail-in ballots with no real signature verification. He’s even gone so far in defending the rigged elections that he sued Kari Lake for defamation after she spoke out against him and the election!

It should also be remembered that Richer oversaw early voting in Lake’s stolen 2022 election for governor and founded and operated the Pro-Democracy Republicans dark money PAC aimed at eliminating candidates with a MAGA agenda, and he admits to voting for Democrats last election cycle. 

In the interview below, Stephen Richer tells an Arizona reporter that he is voting for Joe Biden and his failed policies in 2024. Although Richer claims he voted for President Trump in 2020, it’s unclear if he’s telling the truth.

Clearly, Richer hates Trump so much that he is willing to vote for Arizona’s southern border to remain wide open, for rampant crime, and for inflation to remain high in Phoenix, one of the hardest hit cities by Bidenomics.

It would make sense that Richer is in bed with the Biden Regime, given his history of contacting federal agencies and social media companies to censor conservatives and The Gateway Pundit’s reporting.

Also, recall The Gateway Pundit’s recent reporting on a 2021 op-ed that Richer submitted to the National Review Magazine, where he reveals that he believes the First Amendment is “the biggest threat to elections and Democracy,” that his constituents are “idiots” and that “it may be time to revisit our First Amendment jurisprudence.” Jack Butler, editor of The National Review, rejected the draft op-ed, citing Richer’s attack on freedom of speech; however, Richer apparently gave a similarly written speech, ironically in commemoration of Constitution Day, to students of the Maricopa County Community College District, which was approved by the district beforehand.

Arizona State Representative and Richer’s primary challenger Justin Heap posted the clip on X with the following message:

Heap: The current Maricopa County Recorder is a Republican who admitted yesterday that he is going to vote for Joe Biden in the 2024 Presidential Election

 It is time to replace the current Recorder in the upcoming Republican Primary in July!  I am the only Maricopa County Recorder candidate with a proven Conservative record:

100% Free Enterprise Club Rating

Sponsored HCR to return to Precinct Voting 

Sponsored HCR to exit the ERIC system

Sponsored HCR to enshrine Citizenship Voting in the Arizona Constitution

Sponsored or cosponsored nearly 50 Election Integrity Bills

Vote JUSTIN HEAP this July 30th to restore sanity to the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office! Donate at http://JustinHeap.com

Justin Heap sits on the House Elections Committee and is tied for first place on the Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s legislative scorecard, voting for the conservative agenda 100% of the time and sponsoring or cosponsoring over 30 election integrity bills.

He is also the only serious candidate challenging Richer in the primary.

Arizona talk show host Garret Lewis chimed in on Richer’s despicable statement, adding, “He doesn’t even try to hide it.”

RINO @stephen_richer says he is voting for Joe Biden. He doesn’t even try to hide it. https://t.co/2IJEDKOIHv

— Garret Lewis (@GarretLewis) June 25, 2024

“Is he this confident where he just admits this because maybe, just maybe, he thinks that he has this election in the bag no matter what?” asks Lewis. After all, he is overseeing mail-in voting this election in Arizona’s largest county, which holds over 60% of the votes. What does this mean for Richer’s preferred candidate, Joe Biden?

More from Lewis:

Lewis: Stephen Richer, the RINO Maricopa County Recorder, asked a very simple question; he was asked “who are you going to vote for for President?” What do you think his answer is?

Really? Doesn’t even try to hide the fact that he’s going to vote for Joe Biden for President. So, Stephen Richer is all about high inflation, open borders, world on fire. Good to know. It’s as if Stephen is screaming, “Don’t vote for me! Please, don’t vote for me!” Or is he this confident where he just admits this because maybe, just maybe, he thinks that he has this election in the bag no matter what?

RINO Maricopa County Recorder @stephen_richer was asked if he will vote for Trump or Biden. His answer… pic.twitter.com/yx7CXsiIRE

— Garret Lewis (@GarretLewis) June 25, 2024

The post WATCH: Maricopa County RINO Election Official Stephen Richer Declares His Support for Biden in 2024 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.