Speaker Mike Johnson Tells CNN ‘No One Expects That Joe Biden Will be on Cocaine’ During Debate (VIDEO)

Speaker Mike Johnson has insisted that “no one expects that Joe Biden will be on cocaine” during Thursday night’s debate, despite former President Donald Trump’s comments to the contrary.

Trump has requested that Biden take a drug test before Thursday’s debate, even promising to take one himself as well.

During an appearance on The Source on CNN, Johnson was asked by Kaitlan Collins about Trump’s remarks.

“Just knowing you and how you conduct yourself, do you think some of the rhetoric is out of line when people from Trump’s team are suggesting that – and Trump himself – that Biden is going to be on cocaine when he’s on that debate stage Thursday night?” Collins asked.

Johnson said that Trump was just joking and that nobody believes Biden will be on cocaine.

“Look, there’s a lot of things that are said in jest,” Johnson said. “Of course, no one expects that Joe Biden will be on cocaine.”

Johnson also brought up Biden’s performance at the State of the Union.

“He had a lot of energy that night,” Johnson continued. “So, that’s the Joe Biden I expect to see. The question is, can he stay for 90 minutes on that stage and go toe-to-toe with President Trump, who as you know, goes to rallies and talks two hours on end without any break and any notes.”

In a post to Truth Social on Monday, Trump wrote:

“DRUG TEST FOR CROOKED JOE BIDEN??? I WOULD, ALSO, IMMEDIATELY AGREE TO ONE!!!”

While speaking at a rally in Racine, Wisconsin, last Tuesday, Trump implied that he believes Biden might take cocaine before the debate.

“Joe Biden doesn’t have a clue. Now we’re gonna watch– is anybody gonna watch the debate? He’s gonna be so pumped up, he’s gonna be pumped up. You know all that stuff that was missing about a month ago from the White House? What happened?” Trump said.

TRUMP: BIDEN DOESN’T HAVE A CLUE

“Joe Biden doesn’t have a clue.

Is anybody going to watch the debate?

He’s going to be so pumped up.

You know all that stuff that was missing about a month ago from the White House? What happened? Who left it?

Somebody left a laptop in… pic.twitter.com/Gjeaj20yiM

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) June 18, 2024

“Who left it? Somebody left it. I wonder, let’s see. Somebody left the laptop in an office of a gentleman who was supposed to fix the laptop from hell,” Trump said. “He never picked it up, and somebody didn’t pick up hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of cocaine. I wonder who that could’ve been.”

“I don’t know—actually, I think it was Joe. Ha-ha,” Trump told the crowd.

According to a Quinnipiac University survey released at the end of May, a 72 percent majority of likely voters said it is “likely” that they will watch the first presidential debate.

“Get out the popcorn, pull up a chair, it is must see TV and if the past is any indication, the gloves will likely come off early and often,” said Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy.

The second debate will be hosted by ABC News in September. The network has not yet announced moderators for that debate.

WATCH:

The post Speaker Mike Johnson Tells CNN ‘No One Expects That Joe Biden Will be on Cocaine’ During Debate (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Jack Smith’s Team Attempts to Sway Court with New Photos Alleging Trump Stored Classified Documents in a “Haphazard Manner” at His Mar-a-Lago Mansion

The Gateway Pundit reported in 2022 that the FBI created a fake crime scene at Mar-a-Lago by adding their own documents to the scene and doctoring the photo they released in their report and to the press.

In its response, the DOJ included a document it claims was taken at Mar-a-Lago during its raid. The photo was all over the news on Wednesday, August 31, the day after it was provided to the court.

The cover sheets in the photo that were red, yellow, and brown were inserted by the FBI.  They were the FBI’s cover sheets.  We know this for various reasons.  The Trump White House did not need these cover sheets in the documents they held because they had their own cover sheets.

aThis documents were inserted.  The FBI inserted these to indicate that the “agency implementing regulations” – i.e. the DOJ – is involved in the maintenance of these records but this is not the case.  The President has the right to documents that are his.  They are his property and an inserted document saying something different is simply not true.

Last month, Jack Smith admitted the FBI messed with the boxes containing “classified” documents they seized from Trump and can’t be sure the order or the placement of the documents.

In a May 1 filing, Walt Nauta’s attorney claimed he had difficulty in cross-referencing materials in classified and unclassified discovery because “certain items in the seized boxes he reviewed were in a different order from where they appear in the scans of the boxes’ contents produced in discovery.”

Then this week, Jack Smith admitted the FBI doctored evidence to produce stunt photos of classified documents during the Mar-a-Lago raid.

This contradicts their statement in August 2022, where the DOJ lied to the Court when it claimed that the red, blue, and yellow sheets shown in the viral photo of the classified documents indicated their classification status.

It turns out they were “slip sheets” the FBI used to replace the so-called classified documents. The FBI admitted they messed with Trump’s documents! The FBI used cover sheets as placeholders for the classified documents.

CONFIRMED: As Gateway Pundit Reported — FBI Doctored Mar-a-Lago Photo, Added Their Own Docs that DON’T MATCH INVENTORY REPORTS

On Monday, federal prosecutors led by special counsel Jack Smith released a new set of photos that they claim show classified documents stored in a “haphazard manner” at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

The pictures, some of which had not been previously disclosed, were presented as exhibits in a recent court filing in South Florida.

Below are some of the photos released:

A photo was taken allegedly by Walt Nauta, an aide to Trump, before the FBI raid. (DOJ)
Source: DOJ
Source: DOJ
Source: DOJ
Source: DOJ

The Independent reported:

In photographs attached to a 33-page filing on Monday night, documents marked “secret” and “top secret” or bearing the White House emblem are seen stuffed in cardboard boxes alongside piles of golf shirts, sitting on top of old newspapers, and next to crates of Diet Coke.

One image shows a closet with newspapers and other documents spilling out on the floor from tipped-over boxes.

Smith’s team wrote that Trump “personally chose to keep documents containing some of the nation’s most highly guarded secrets in cardboard boxes along with a collection of other personally chosen keepsakes of various sizes and shapes from his presidency – newspapers, thank you notes, Christmas ornaments, magazines, clothing, and photographs of himself and others.”

After he left the White House in January 2021, Trump took his “cluttered collection of keepsakes” to his Florida home, “where the boxes traveled from one readily accessible location to another — a public ballroom, an office space, a bathroom, and a basement storage room,” according to prosecutors.

The photos were part of a court filing aimed at opposing Trump’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on the “spoliation” of evidence.

Recall that Trump’s legal team in February filed several motions to dismiss Jack Smith’s classified documents case. Judge Cannon previously denied Trump’s motion to dismiss the classified docs case on ‘unconstitutional vagueness’ of the Espionage Act, however, a third motion based on selective prosecution is still pending.

In his unsealed motion to dismiss, Trump highlighted how others, such as James Comey, Joe Biden, Mike Pence, and Bill and Hillary Clinton, all illegally possessed classified documents, yet they were never prosecuted.

Trump’s lawyers argued that Joe Biden stored boxes of classified documents in his garage, Penn Biden Center and Chinatown… all locations remained accessible to people without security clearances. Biden was never charged for stealing SCIF-designated documents and storing them in dilapidated boxes in his garage.

President Trump’s lawyers argued that former President Bill Clinton stored classified tapes in his sock drawer, yet he was never prosecuted.

Mike Pence disclosed to NARA that “a small number of documents bearing classified markings” were stored at his home in Indiana, yet he was never prosecuted.

Trump also slammed Hillary Clinton.

“Hillary Clinton and her colleagues deleted 31,830 emails and destroyed data on numerous electronic devices, including after a congressional preservation order,” Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche wrote referring to Hillary’s criminal email deletion and use of BleachBit to destroy emails under subpoena. Hillary also took a hammer to her BlackBerrys.

Trump’s defense also argues that FBI agents who executed the search warrant failed to maintain the order of the documents as they were found. They also claim that no photos were taken to show the sequence of records in each box containing them, according to CBS.

Trump’s legal team contends that this mismanagement of the documents’ sequence not only violated his due process rights but also undermines the claim that Trump was aware of the classified nature of the documents mixed with personal items.

CBS reported:

Smith’s team, though, argued in his latest filing that there is no basis for throwing out the charges against Trump because of a disruption of the precise order of documents seized from Mar-a-Lago.

“Trump personally chose to keep documents containing some of the nation’s most highly guarded secrets in cardboard boxes along with a collection of other personally chosen keepsakes of various sizes and shapes from his presidency,” prosecutors on the special counsel’s team said.

They accused the former president of maintaining the boxes containing sensitive material in a “haphazard manner” and said the FBI agents who conducted the search “did so professionally, thoroughly, and carefully under challenging circumstances.” Smith is separately seeking to bar Trump from making public statements that endanger law enforcement officers involved in the case. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over proceedings, did not seem receptive to prosecutors’ arguments to modify the conditions of his release during a hearing on the matter Monday.

It should be noted that the FBI turned off security cameras at Mar-a-Lago out of “concern for agent safety.”

“At approximately 9:55 am, the CCTV servers were turned off to prevent recording, at the request of the FBI, out of concern for agent safety,” Jack Smith’s prosecutors wrote. “At approximately 10:20 am, recording resumed at the request of Trump attorneys.”

The post Jack Smith’s Team Attempts to Sway Court with New Photos Alleging Trump Stored Classified Documents in a “Haphazard Manner” at His Mar-a-Lago Mansion appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Georgia Supreme Court Removes Atlanta Judge Christina Peterson Following Assault on Police Officer — The Final Blow in a Long Battle Against Judicial Misconduct Allegations Since She was Elected

Source: City of Atlanta Police Department

Douglas County Probate Judge Christina Peterson has been removed from her position following an incident where she was arrested for allegedly assaulting a police officer outside a Buckhead nightclub.

This incident served as the final straw in a series of 30 ethics charges brought against her by the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC).

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Christina Peterson had been charged with simple battery against a police officer and felony willful obstruction of law enforcement by use of threats of violence.

The incident took place at the Red Martini Restaurant and Lounge in Atlanta’s Buckhead neighborhood.

According to the news release from the City of Atlanta Police Department:

On June 20th, 2024, at approximately 3:18 a.m., an Atlanta Police officer working an approved extra job at 3179 Peachtree Rd. NE, overheard a commotion nearby and went to investigate. During this time, he noticed security at the location escorting a female out of the venue.

While assisting security and attempting to de-escalate the situation, an unidentified female, later identified as 38-year-old Christina Peterson rushed toward the commotion and immediately started screaming at the security guard and the officer. Ms. Peterson then forcibly pushed the officer in the chest and kept swiping his hands away as he attempted to assist the female being escorted out.

Ms. Peterson pushed the officer in the chest again and that is when she was subsequently placed into custody. The arresting officer attempted several times to obtain the female suspect’s identifying information for processing purposes, however, she refused to cooperate. This caused a delay in the officer transporting her to jail. Upon further investigation, officers were able to later confirm her identity.

The officer was able to provide a Fulton County judge with probable cause, and secured arrest warrants for Ms. Peterson for Simple Battery Against a Police Officer and Obstruction of Law Enforcement Officer. Ms. Peterson was transported to the Fulton County Jail for processing and taken into their custody without incident.

On Saturday, the City of Atlanta Police Department released the body cam footage of Christina Peterson assaulting a police officer.

The two-hour video footage reveals Peterson refusing to provide her name to the officer, while consistently displaying loud and belligerent behavior throughout the incident.

Watch the edited video below:

Elected to the bench in an uncontested November 2020 election, 38-year-old Peterson has been battling judicial misconduct allegations since she assumed office.

These included multiple violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct (CJC) demonstrating a pattern of misconduct throughout her term. The Supreme Court’s decision to remove Peterson came after a thorough review, where it found clear and convincing evidence supporting 28 out of 30 misconduct allegations.

“Douglas County Probate Court Judge Christina Peterson has been charged with a number of violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct (CJC), including a number of violations that the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) says exhibited a pattern of judicial misconduct while in office,” the court said in a ruling issued Tuesday morning, the Atlanta News First reported. “The JQC Hearing Panel found that Judge Peterson violated multiple rules in the CJC and that 2 those violations warrant her removal from the bench.

“We agree that removal is warranted here … Accordingly, it is ordered that Judge Christina Peterson of the Douglas County Probate Court be removed from office, effective upon the date of this opinion. As a result, Judge Peterson ‘shall not be eligible to be elected or appointed to any judicial office in this state until seven years have elapsed’ from the date of this opinion.”

Read the ruling below:

The post Georgia Supreme Court Removes Atlanta Judge Christina Peterson Following Assault on Police Officer — The Final Blow in a Long Battle Against Judicial Misconduct Allegations Since She was Elected appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Boebert Sails Through Her Primary

Lauren Boebert, the Republican congresswoman known for her firebrand politics and a series of scandals in her private life, has won the Republican primary for Colorado’s Fourth Congressional District. Boebert carried 43 percent of the vote; the runner-up, Jerry Sonnenberg, won only 14 percent. 

Boebert’s decision to switch from the competitive Third District to the safer Fourth District, which provoked allegations of “carpetbagging,” was enabled by the retirement of the incumbent representative, the Republican Ken Buck.

Boebert had received an endorsement from former President Donald Trump ahead of the primary.

The post Boebert Sails Through Her Primary appeared first on The American Conservative.

BREAKING: Big News for Steve Bannon! — Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Votes that J6 Committee Was ILLEGITIMATE — House to File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court [VIDEO]

Late in the evening on Tuesday, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson announced that the House would file an amicus brief in support of Steve Bannon’s appeal against his contempt of Congress conviction related to the J6 investigation by the illegitimate January 6th Committee.

Screenshot – Speaker Mike Johnson

The Citizen Press tweeted about the “Big news” for Steve Bannon Tuesday night:

1) The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) voted tonight 3-2, confirming the official legal position of the House is that the J6 committee was illegitimate, and all subpoenas issued by the committee were also illegitimate.

2) BLAG has now directed the House Office of General Counsel to file an Amicus Brief in support of Steve Bannon with Justice Roberts.

3) Matt Gaetz explains how the BLAG process works in the video.

4) I spoke with Bannon in the last hour and he is optimistic.

Big news for Steve Bannon tonight

1) The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) voted tonight 3-2, confirming the offiicial legal position of the House is that the J6 committee was illegitimate, and all subpoenas issued by the committee were also illegitimate.

2) BLAG has now…

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) June 26, 2024

The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) is a standing body of the U.S. House of Representatives, established in 1993. It is composed of the Speaker of the House and the majority and minority leaderships. BLAG directs the activities of the House’s Office of General Counsel, providing guidance and oversight on legal issues and decisions that involve the House of Representatives.

Speaker Johnson appeared on Fox News tonight with Sean Hannity to share the hopeful news.

Sean Hannity asked Speaker Johnson to update his viewers on the latest actions by the US House: “Mr. Speaker, I understand that might be a change in position regarding the House and their stance on the January 6 Committee, and it might be regarding Steve Bannon, and it may have a big impact on his contempt case. Tell me what’s going on…”

Speaker Johnson responded, “Yeah, we’re working on filing an amicus brief on his appellate work there in his case because the January 6 committee was, we think, wrongly wrongfully constituted. We think the work was tainted. We think that they may have very well-covered up evidence and maybe even more nefarious activities. We’ve been investigating the committee itself. We disagree with how Speaker Pelosi put all that together. We think it violated House rules. And so we will be expressing that to the court, and I think it will help Steve Bannon in his appeal.”

WATCH:

BREAKING

Mike Johnson just announced that he has authorized the House to submit a congressional Amicus Brief on behalf of Steve Bannon to the Supreme Court and Justice Roberts.

Finally some positive momentum for Bannon.pic.twitter.com/gH9mR2XI8Y

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) June 26, 2024

This decision by the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) that declared the January 6th Committee illegitimate also declared its subpoenas, including the subpoena served to Steve Bannon that he ignored, allowing the J6 Witch Hunt Committee to charge him with contempt of court.

Speaker Mike Johnson also appeared on CNN to discuss the decision by the House to a disappointed Kaitlin Collins.

Presented without comment about Kaitlin’s affect here.

But more important to note is that CNN continues to spread the lie that executive privilege cannot be taken by a President in connection with communications engaged in with someone outside government (see end of the clip… https://t.co/tqDGev77Vn

— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) June 26, 2024

Last week, Steve Bannon lost his appeal to delay the July 1 start of his criminal contempt-of-Congress prison sentence starting in July.

The far-left US DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Bannon. Bannon, the former Chief Strategist to former President Donald Trump, will likely seek the intervention of the Supreme Court.

Rep. Byron Daniels was asked about the vote today by the House. Rep. Daniels (R-FL) responded with this tweet:

“If Steve Bannon & Peter Navarro are the standard for DOJ prosecution, then why is AG Garland an exception?

Garland decided his opinion matters more than the elected representatives of the American people.

He thinks he’s above the law.
That’s a SERIOUS PROBLEM.
Congress must act.”

If Steve Bannon & Peter Navarro are the standard for DOJ prosecution then why is AG Garland an exception?

Garland decided his opinion matters more than the elected representatives of the American people.

He thinks he’s above the law.
That’s a SERIOUS PROBLEM.
Congress must act. pic.twitter.com/4Uxy8eWYYL

— Congressman Byron Donalds (@RepDonaldsPress) June 26, 2024

On Friday morning, Jeff Clark, the Former US DOJ Double Assistant AG, posted this on Twitter. Steve Bannon has only nine days left until he will be sent to prison for the four months leading up to the 2024 election – the most important election in the last 150 years!

On Friday, Clark warned that there were only 9 days left to keep Bannon out of federal prison.

There are only 9 days left to keep Bannon out of federal prison.

Bannon’s team has just filed an emergency stay application in the Supreme Court. See snapshot of first two pages below.

The House needs to get a move on to file an amicus brief in support of the emergency… pic.twitter.com/TtOoYBvdEw

— Jeff Clark (@JeffClarkUS) June 21, 2024

It appears as though members of the House have thrown the unjustly accused and sentenced Steve Bannon a lifeboat! Pray for Steve Bannon, for the brave House members fighting to save an innocent man from the clutches of Democrats who use lawfare to punish their political enemies, and for Chief Justice John Roberts to clearly see this sick and demented scheme by the Democrats for what it is and that he will do the right thing.

The post BREAKING: Big News for Steve Bannon! — Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Votes that J6 Committee Was ILLEGITIMATE — House to File Amicus Brief with Supreme Court [VIDEO] appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Pro-Lifers Are Unprepared for Abortion as a Political Issue

Pro-Lifers Are Unprepared for Abortion as a Political Issue

The GOP’s flirtation with pulling up the federal restriction plank underlines the post-Dobbs crisis.


Credit: Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Court Accountability

Two years after Roe v. Wade was overturned, Republicans are poised to rewrite their platform plank on abortion to more closely reflect the presumptive nominee’s federalist position on the issue, possibly setting up a major confrontation with pro-life activists in Milwaukee next month.

The pro-life plank has been in the GOP platform, with varying degrees of firmness or equivocation, for 48 years. Language backing “a constitutional amendment to restore protection of the right to life for unborn children” was initially introduced amid infighting between delegates committed to Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan in what was the closest thing to a contested convention in the modern political era, just four years after Gallup found Republicans were more likely than Democrats to believe “the decision to have an abortion should be made solely by a woman and her physician.”

I’ve generally defended Donald Trump’s approach to abortion this election cycle, not because I think it is ideal—though constitutionally, police powers do belong to the states—or that the right to life is contingent upon geography. But I do not want the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, handed down by the conservative Supreme Court majority Trump helped build, to be a pyrrhic victory. 

Dobbs returned abortion policy to the people and their elected representatives after nearly a half century of it being mostly at the discretion of judges, with some marginal improvements after Casey v. Planned Parenthood that led to the debate largely being conducted in the 1990s and 2000s on grounds favorable to the pro-life side.

Dobbs opened the door to greater legal protection for the unborn, but it didn’t guarantee it. It also shifted the abortion debate to terrain less favorable to the pro-life cause. Abortion restrictions can now be enacted even when they are unpopular, if pro-lifers can win the elections necessary to do so.

President Joe Biden likes to mock Justice Sam Alito’s line in Dobbs that women are not without political power in modern America. It is simply true that allowing abortion policy to be formulated democratically means that public opinion on this question now matters more than it did for decades of Roe, not less.

The following worst case scenario for the pro-life movement is not my prediction for November, but not wholly implausible: Biden is reelected; Democrats win control of the House of Representatives, where Republicans have a slender majority that has been beset by infighting and dysfunction; Democrats hold the Senate, where Republican candidates look for the moment to be underperforming yet again, this time without filibuster-defenders Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema.

Even a modest Democratic majority in the Senate could eliminate the legislative filibuster. Democrats could then pass and have Biden sign federal legislation that would jeopardize if not nullify state-level abortion restrictions. All this while blue and purple states increasingly adopt state-level constitutional protections for legal abortion. This would lead to a worse abortion outcome than prevailed under the final years of Roe.

Such legislation could be much more quickly and easily repealed than Roe the next time Republicans held the necessary power. (The same would be true of Democrats with federal pro-life laws passed by Republicans.) But there is nothing in the Obamacare “repeal and replace” experience that suggests this would be something to bank on, especially with so many GOP politicians eager to get back to their abortion positions being toothless.

There was always a risk that returning abortion policy to the people would produce abortion laws no better than most of Europe’s, though that would still have been an improvement over the Roe status quo. Those were the laws produced by other secular democracies, after all. But this would be worse.

Every action produces an opposite reaction. It is possible that Democratic overreach, such as reopening the debate over partial-birth abortion, would swing the pendulum back in the pro-life direction. And as new issues like IVF emerge, pro-lifers cannot entirely subordinate principle to politics or banish from their discourse all that is not immediately politically possible.

But abortion politics are no longer a matter of virtue-signaling or moderating the worst excesses of the pro-abortion side. A confused and conflicted electorate is being asked to engage on this issue while a cynical and unpopular political class has been empowered to govern on it.

The pro-life side is going to have to give serious thought about how to ensure Dobbs remains the once-in-a-generation win and opportunity it appeared to be two years ago.

The post Pro-Lifers Are Unprepared for Abortion as a Political Issue appeared first on The American Conservative.

It Was Never Kennedy

It Was Never Kennedy

In Albuquerque, the outsider candidate’s campaign seemed ready to fade into the sand.

I set out of Santa Fe early Saturday morning down I-25 to see Bobby Kennedy Jr. at the Kiva Auditorium in Albuquerque. 

It’s one of those great days in New Mexico. The sun is high, the sky is open, the mountains all jetting across a washed desert. There are waves of blue streams and orange haze rippling out as far as the eye can see. I’m headed to that rocky meth city we affectionately call the ‘Burque in anticipation of seeing Kennedy and his new documentary on America’s drug and homeless epidemic.

I happen to like Albuquerque. Sure, it’s a lot like all the other big-box retail cities in this country, but it’s got spice. And if you curl down the upper-west side, as I plan to do, there’s a beautiful, rich, green farm country where horses and alpacas and wild ranges of flora and fauna give way to the barren sand beyond. 

It’s always hotter in Albuquerque, and, as I criss-cross the city in anticipation of Kennedy’s appearance in the 505, I can’t help but notice the subtle dots that cap the i’s of our American cities; the downtrodden Dillards, the ripped-up parking lots, the drag-racing cars, the strip mall tyrannies, the sad people in whose faces are worn long years of drugs and time and, of course, sand.

Nothing here so reminds me of Virginia and Oregon and Arkansas and all the other places in between than these dilapidated, ripped-up parking lots and the broken people that fan out across our urban centers. The great unifier of modern America is here, alive and well—blight. 

With the risk of this column itself becoming blighted by such concerning miseries, allow me to reboot: I stop in for a drink at an up-scale farm and boutique hotel in that lovely upper-west side of Albuquerque I mentioned before. Two young, good looking bartenders are flirting when I sit down. I’m on serious business here, so I do what any of my idols would—I order a Maker’s Mark (neat) and thumb through the latest POLITICO hit piece on Kennedy.

He can’t raise money. 

“Without a $10 million cash infusion from his running mate, Nicole Shanahan, the campaign would be in debt.” My immediate reaction: What the hell am I doing in Albuquerque?

But I’m dreaming of vaunted tacos on southside and the adventure to come so I grab the check, and off I head, past the beautiful farms, weaving through the Breaking Bad suburbs and then across the Rio Grande, to the south of town, the ghetto, where little English is spoken and you’d better have cash.

My favorite taco place in all of New Mexico is called El Paisa, and it sits in this ghetto. Here, too, the streets are ripped up and the lights blink on and off overhead. The energy is different, though. For the mostly Hispanic residents who reside here, many of which are newly-minted Americans or outright illegal, here lies the promise of a new beginning, not the ending salvo of the American Dream. I turn into the gravel parking lot, a “Church of Christ” sign hangs where you’d expect the restaurant’s name to be found. I’m here. 

The inside of El Paisa looks like a cafeteria with small picnic tables dotting the eating area. The walls are painted bright yellow and in every corner hangs a portrait of Emiliano Zapata, the leading figure of the Mexican Revolution. Here, in this tiny corner of our new America lies that uncomfortable reality of what is coming and who will be voting for it.

The two Hispanic men in front me with spurs on their boots and matches in their hats quickly rattle off their order. When the staff get to me, I don’t try to speak broken Spanish. They speak in broken English. I get the usual—four asada tacos with a mandarin Jarrito.

After a quick bite, it’s off to see Kennedy. He’s speaking at the Kiva Auditorium in downtown Albuquerque not too far from the University of New Mexico but essentially a million miles from El Paisa. Kennedy is debuting a documentary there titled Rediscovering America, examining the drug and homeless epidemic in the United States. He couldn’t have picked a better city to premier the film.

Driving across the Duke City, I spot zombies of every type. Sand monsters, dope hounds, tricksters, prostitutes, the insane. Albuquerque, as much as any American city, is ground zero for the drug epidemic, and Kennedy’s presence in the city shows sharp strategic instincts if nothing else. 

If there’s any state where Kennedy could make a play, it’s probably New Mexico. Though often considered a “Deep Blue” state, the area has a notable independent streak and fiercely individual-minded residents. After all, they chose the mountain climber and (former) pothead Gary Johnson for governor even though he was a Republican. Years later, 10 percent of New Mexican voters chose Johnson for president in the 2016 election, a high water mark for the Libertarian Party. 

Which is all to say I was a wee-bit disappointed when, driving around the Kiva Auditorium, I could not spot one single Kennedy placard, or supporter, or sign pointing in the direction of the event. Google Maps marked the Kiva as “closed” on Saturday. And yet, I persisted. 

I park outside a graffiti-covered, vacated office. The parking meter is broken. Of course the parking meter is broken. Music reverberates through the hollow city corridor and, as I approach the Kiva, I can see a couple thousand people gathered outside in a big plaza enjoying the worst funk cover band you can imagine. 

I wander around the massive, broken down convention center and fail to find entry. 

Every door is locked. I double check the website. Yes—Kiva Auditorium. Saturday, June 15. I disregard the giant red “closed” banner above the Kiva page on Google. Seeking another entrance, I slowly follow the curve of the building and run into two literal crackheads ripping fent or God-knows what right there, outside the venue. Should I invite them to the documentary? 

I find an open door and away I go. There, I am greeted with a grouping of metal detectors and, lying against the wall behind security, are a row of Kennedy/Shanahan 2024 signs. This must be the place.

I’ve seen insurgent campaigns. I saw Barack Obama speak in front of thousands at a packed house in Santa Fe a week before Super Tuesday in February 2008. It was still early in that race which wouldn’t be decided until June. But listening to Obama’s supporters chant “Sí se puede!” that night, you could feel the energy was on his side. I watched Ron Paul almost topple the Republican establishment four years before Donald Trump successfully did so. And I also witnessed the thoroughly disappointing but highly entertaining and energetic campaign of Gary Johnson.

Kennedy’s event featured none of the bullish energy I’ve come to associate with those campaigns. 

A yawning, balding security guard greets me in the big, empty lobby of the Kiva. I ask where the event is. “I think it’s upstairs? Honestly, most people are going to the music on the other side.” 

Remember the awful funk band I mentioned earlier? “Most” people were apparently just passing through the Kiva auditorium as a security measure to see said funk band, not Kennedy. I ask a couple concert goers if they know Kennedy is speaking at the Kiva today. “Who is that?”

I ride the lonely escalator upstairs and spot a medium-sized Kennedy banner hanging high above the convention center.

About 250 people occupy the super-wide, half-empty Kiva auditorium. Both aisles flanking the stage are empty but the main, middle corridor of the venue is reasonably packed. There are a couple hippie guys on stage playing acoustic folk guitar. The crowd is a majority white, a notable irony given the vocal and constant appeals to minority rights and status throughout the event. 

The event is particularly geared toward Native Americans, who make up 11 percent of New Mexico’s population. There is a land acknowledgement, of course. The kind of display that wows the rich, white donors of Santa Fe and the new liberals by way of California who have recently made the Land of Enchantment their home. I’m not sure it plays much with the Albuquerque everyman. New Mexico is still Spanish land, after all, and the Spanish win elections. 

This gimmicky ritual has become a standard affair at events for the elevated left wing of northern New Mexico. Guilt over the status of the poor pueblo people mixed with an ever-present outsider complex drives the liberal class to bend over backwards in efforts to project virtue and sensitivity regarding Indian issues. 

But it all comes off as forced and tacky and terribly California—because it is. There weren’t many concrete solutions, but, man, did the ocean breeze smell fresh. It smacked of a utopia lost.

The whole scene reminded me of the Old Left. The antiwar, anti–Big Pharma, easy-breezy types. Big government skeptics in sandals who undeniably, if unknowingly through their ignorance or disinterest, provided an entry framework for the more socially extreme elements of the progressives that dominate today’s modern left. 

“You have to reach outside yourself,” said one of the bearded hippies to meek applause. “You have it in you right now. You might have to do something you’ve never done to accomplish it.”

It was perhaps the most insightful quote of the day. The whole place felt like an AA meeting, or a retreat for strange birds. 

Despite the dire reports from POLITICO, the rally didn’t seem to lack for production cash, with three massive TV panels booming out the candidate’s film Rediscovering America. A row of AV techs lined the back of the room as Kennedy’s campaign livestreamed the event on YouTube. 

“You can see people out here smoking crack.” Kennedy was speaking about the streets of San Francisco but he could’ve as easily been describing the scene right outside the Kiva that day. In 2023, New Mexico was ranked the worst for drug usage in the country. 

In the film, Kennedy visits a Texas ranch where faith and hard work have helped a motley crew of 12 guys get over their drug addictions. Kennedy opens up about his own issues with heroin and sex addiction. 

He promises as president to build “hundreds of healing farms” where former addicts can become cooks, plumbers, farmers, and more. Kennedy says he’ll use a federal tax on legalized weed to make it happen. “Californication” echoes through my skull.

Then came the man himself. Kennedy. It’s a pity about his voice, because Kennedy clearly looks the part. The fit of his suit was fresh, his smile beamed from the podium, standing with the sort of confidence that one only earns from years of living as a genuine blue-blood. 

“We’ve become a country of individuals, of isolation, and alienation, and disposition,” Kennedy said. “One of the things I’m going to try to do in the White House is figure out every way we can to rebuild those bonds of community by inspiring Americans to be helpful, and of use and service to other people.”

Kennedy’s “Can’t we all just come together, man” mantra is no doubt a welcome retreat from the era of partisan division that we find ourselves mired in. Yet, throughout his short speech and roundtable with Dr. Drew Pinsky that followed, I couldn’t help but think Kennedy should’ve simply become a podcaster and saved everyone a lot of time, money, and energy for a campaign that appears politically aimless and financially floundering. 

“The only way we can help someone else is by helping ourselves,” Kennedy continued. “By finding ways in which we can be of service to other people. There are 1,000 ways to get sober, but they all involve being good to other human beings.”

It was the perfect coda to the event. Days later, Kennedy learned that he had failed to qualify for the all-important first debate on CNN at the end of June. Instead of taking responsibility for failing to clear achievable metrics, he blamed Trump and Biden.

“President Trump and President Biden don’t agree on much, but they do agree on excluding me from the debate stage,” Kennedy responded via X.

Though the Kennedy team may have legitimate gripes about the rules favoring the major parties, his failure to qualify for the primetime event by any realistic projection dooms the prospects of future, much-needed cash infusions into the campaign. The big brokers wanted to see if his campaign was serious, and missing one of the two debates probably signals the end to whatever slim chances Kennedy and Shanahan had at competing in 2024.

At the risk of sounding overly cynical about the whole thing, I sincerely believe there’s an important place for Kennedy’s message. In an era of screen-induced social isolation and worsening mental-health issues, someone who spreads awareness about the poisons present in our foods and medicines (all while covered in ladybugs) is a welcome overture from the Old Left. 

But the campaign has sputtered in recent months and failed to inspire the sort of practical, daily support you need from the Albuquerque everyman to actually compete—something Donald Trump has, oddly, always appealed to on a purely instinctual level. 

Kennedy made no mention of Israel during his three-hour jaunt. Just a few steps from here in May, Palestinian activists faced off with police on the UNM campus before 16 were arrested. 

In May, New York Magazine astutely noted Kennedy’s position on Israel would alienate leftists. It has. I would be remiss to not note that his Israel position has also soured a small but not insignificant contingent of right-wing voters as well. If there was a spot to pick off disaffected, independent-minded voters in this year’s election, it was probably by going rogue on Israel, but Kennedy played establishment.

No matter Kennedy’s position on Israel or vaccines or the drug epidemic, it’s difficult to imagine Kennedy mustering more than 10 percent in a country so radically inundated with the left–right spectrum. It’s even harder to imagine now that he’s failed to make the June debate stage.

And as far as Kennedy at the Kiva on that Saturday in Albuquerque, it felt a bit like the balloon had popped. The sort of rough, if not premature, ending to what earlier in the year appeared to be one of the more promising independent campaigns in American history. 

The post It Was Never Kennedy appeared first on The American Conservative.

Assange Is Free, But Feds’ War On Free Speech Continues

Assange Is Free, But Feds’ War On Free Speech Continues

Unless we presume politicians have a divine right to deceive the governed, America should honor individuals who expose federal crimes.


Credit: acidpolly

After 1,900 days locked away in Britain’s maximum-security Belmarsh prison, Julian Assange finally escaped this week and fled back towards his Australian homeland. His breakout was enabled by a shameless legal charade that was a far better choice than life in prison. 

On Wednesday, Assange is scheduled to appear before a U.S. judge in the Northern Mariana Islands to enter a formal guilty plea to one charge of conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act, “receiving and obtaining” secret documents, and “willfully communicating” them “to persons not entitled to receive them.” The Espionage Act is a World War I relic that presidents are increasingly using to suppress exposure of U.S. government crimes at home and abroad. No wonder so many press organizations championed Assange’s cause, since this guilty plea sets a precedent to target far more journalists in the future. As Trevor Timm, the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, noted, the Justice Department wanted Assange “convicted under the Espionage Act for acts of journalism, which would leave many reporters exposed to the same.”

Assange’s lawyers cut a deal to assure that he would never have to appear before a judge in the notorious federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, which is known for harshly punishing anyone accused of tarnishing the image of the U.S. government or its Deep-State agencies. The Justice Department stated in its announcement of the settlement that the Pacific Ocean–based site was chosen “in light of the defendant’s opposition to traveling to the continental United States to enter his guilty plea.” The only thing that would have been more appropriate than Assange appearing in a Northern Mariana federal courtroom is if his case was being adjudicated by the U.S. Space Force on Mars, since the rationales for prosecution are so far out of this world. 

Assange has been in the federal crosshairs ever since his organization, Wikileaks, released scores of thousands of documents in 2010 exposing lies and atrocities regarding the Afghan and Iraq wars, thanks to leaks from Army Corporal Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning.

Among other heroic achievements, Assange provoked some of America’s biggest political scoundrels to show their stripes. In 2010, Vice President Joe Biden denounced Assange as a “high tech terrorist.” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton bizarrely claimed that the disclosures were “not just an attack on America—it’s an attack on the international community,” and the leaks “tear at the fabric” of responsible government. Clinton never forgave Assange for exposing so many of her lies on foreign policy. 

Trump’s Secretary of State Mike Pompeo denounced WikiLeaks as a “non-state hostile intelligence service” and labeled Assange a “fraud,” “coward,” and “enemy.” Pompeo declared, “To give them the space to crush us with misappropriated secrets is a perversion of what our great Constitution stands for.” 

But “our great Constitution” never intended for Washington to keep endless secrets from the American people. Former Vice President Mike Pence on Monday denounced the Assange-DOJ settlement: “There should be no plea deals to avoid prison for anyone that endangers the security of our military or the national security of the United States. Ever.” But what about top government officials who deceive Americans to unjustifiably send U.S. troops into foreign combat? We’re still waiting for Pence to atone for his cheerleading for Bush’s Iraq War.

The Justice Department’s settlement with Assange is an example of how the Biden administration is marginally less odious than the Trump administration—at least on some issues. The Obama administration had considered indicting Assange but recognized that the legal case was both profoundly flawed and profoundly dangerous to free speech. Those impediments were no handicap for the Trump Justice Department to indict Assange. According to Yahoo News, “Some senior officials inside the CIA and the Trump administration even discussed killing Assange…. Discussions over kidnapping or killing Assange occurred ‘at the highest levels’ of the Trump administration, said a former senior counterintelligence official. ‘There seemed to be no boundaries.’”

The fixation on destroying Assange was no aberration for the Trump era. Trump endlessly howled about the Deep State while his appointees persecuted Assange, Edward Snowden, and Daniel Hale, who exposed the civilian carnage from Obama’s drone killing program. Trump’s Justice Department invoked state secrets to cover up Bush-era torture atrocities and to shroud CIA bankrolling of murderous Syrian terrorist groups (those mischievous “moderate” rebels). 

Has Trump seen the error of his ways? When he spoke at the Libertarian Party national convention last month, Trump declared, “In the last year, I’ve been indicted by the government on 91 different things, so if I wasn’t a libertarian before, I sure as hell am a libertarian now.” Trump wouldn’t have to become a libertarian to recognize the need to leash prosecutors and heartedly respect the First Amendment. But is Trump corrigible? 

If Trump gets re-elected and is serious about respecting freedom of the press, he could start by granting a full pardon to Assange, expunging his “get out of jail” guilty plea. Better yet, as I wrote in USA Today in 2018, Assange should receive a Presidential Medal of Freedom. Unless we presume politicians have a divine right to deceive the governed, America should honor individuals who expose federal crimes. As Assange declared, “If wars can be started by lies, they can be stopped by truth.”

The post Assange Is Free, But Feds’ War On Free Speech Continues appeared first on The American Conservative.

Biden’s Surgeon General Declares Gun Violence in America a ‘Public Health Crisis’ (VIDEO)

Joe Biden’s Surgeon General Vivek Murthy has declared gun violence in America to be a ‘public health crisis.’

Democrats have been desperate to pass more gun control measures and critics of this move by Murthy are calling it an end-run around the Constitution.

This is typical for the left. When they can’t get what they want through the normal legislative process, they look for other means.

FOX News reports:

Surgeon general declares firearm violence in America a public health crisis

The United States surgeon general is declaring gun violence a national public health crisis.

Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued an advisory on Tuesday stating that firearm-related violence and its immediate psychological ramifications on victims and bystanders has severely compromised public health.

“Today, for the first time in the history of our office, I am issuing a Surgeon General’s Advisory on firearm violence,” Murthy said in a video announcement. “It outlines the urgent threat firearm violence poses to the health and well-being of our country.”

“As a doctor, I’ve seen the consequences of firearm violence up close and the lives of the patients that cared for over the years,” the surgeon general continued. “These are moms and dads, sons and daughters, all of whom were robbed of their physical and mental health by senseless acts of violence.”

The advisory states that 54% of adults in America have experienced a firearm-related incident. These experiences with firearm violence include individuals who have been threatened with a gun (21%), lost a family member in a gun-related death (19%), witnessed a shooting (17%), and been wounded by a firearm (4%).

See the video below:

The US Surgeon General warns that gun violence is now a public health crisis. pic.twitter.com/SsicTNRXHo

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) June 26, 2024

But not Fentanyl…

— Richard Moreland (@rhmoreland) June 26, 2024

Is there a vaccine?
Do we need to wear masks?

— Empty Queue (@The_Empty_Queue) June 26, 2024

People are right to be skeptical. The timing of this move is very interesting.

The post Biden’s Surgeon General Declares Gun Violence in America a ‘Public Health Crisis’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Almost a Year After Disastrous Fire, Residents of Lahaina in Hawaii Are Still Fighting for Chance to Rebuild (VIDEO)

Black fencing erected in Lahaina, Maui, in August 2023 to block the public’s view of ground zero of the Hawaiian fires (Video screenshot)

The fire that destroyed Lahaina on the island of Maui in the state of Hawaii was almost a year ago and yet residents of the community are still struggling to rebuild.

While Biden and congress rush to pass more spending for Ukraine on a regular basis, American citizens in Hawaii are still dealing with this. When was the last time you heard anyone in government even talk about Lahaina?

The Twitter/X post below reads:

UPDATE On The Lahaina Maui Fire Victims

NEW: “Aloha from Lahaina, Maui. June 22nd update. As you can see, you still can’t get into Lahaina. Access is still restricted. Nobody’s rebuilding yet still 10 months into the fires”

“To get a building permit, you have to go to the county. They now have a review board. You have to fill out this this paperwork. It’s just endless, and it takes forever. It’s a building permit process review board. Just everything’s just being slowed down and dragging on, and you wonder why.

And, um, so the army of engineers have said they cleaned out 1200 lots, residential lots of debris, ashes, toxic.

I don’t know what I still don’t know. I’m not an expert. What’s toxic?

They’re now slowly doing commercial lots. Like, 40 commercial lots have been cleared. They said they cleaned out 2,000 burned vehicles. I think it’s all moving slow, but, you know, people say, well, here, we’re on an island. But, anyway, you have to wonder why…

Crazy. So these are the little tiny container homes in Kahului for fire victims, but, you know, so many people have left the island. They’ve given up. It’s sad.“

Watch the video:

UPDATE On The Lahaina Maui Fire Victims

NEW: “Aloha from Lahaina, Maui. June 22nd update. As you can see, you still can’t get into Lahaina. Access is still restricted. Nobody’s rebuilding yet still 10 months into the fires”

“To get a building permit, you have to go to the… pic.twitter.com/CRfgiSvloE

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 24, 2024

Have these people been forgotten and abandoned? Why are they not getting more attention and help from our leaders in DC?

The post Almost a Year After Disastrous Fire, Residents of Lahaina in Hawaii Are Still Fighting for Chance to Rebuild (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.