Biden Campaign Co-Chair Claims THIS is the Main Reason Joe Biden Was Pushed Out of the 2024 Race

People will be talking about Joe Biden’s exit from the 2024 presidential election for decades to come. It hasn’t happened since LBJ decided not to run for reelection and in that case it was entirely his own decision.

There has already been tons of speculation about the main reasons why this happened and people have cited Biden’s health, his mental deterioration, the polls and his awful debate performance in June.

If you listen to his campaign co-chair Cedric Richmond however, it all came down to just one thing. The money.

According to Richmond, once the big Dem donors shut off the cash flow, Biden was doomed.

Townhall reports:

Biden campaign co-chair Cedric Richmond explained what really forced Biden out: big donors bailed on him.

They “created a self-fulfilling prophecy,” by failing to contribute after the June 27 debate, he said on CNN following Biden’s bombshell announcement. “You can’t win without money, and then they were going to point the finger at the candidate.

“They were going to blame it on Biden,” he added. “For a president that has accomplished so much, it was a no-win situation.”

Now that they successfully pushed Biden out of the race, Richmond said it’s time for those donors to “step the f*** up” and support Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign.

So far, it appears they are.

So now we know who really runs the Democrat party. It’s the people with the cash. People like George Clooney run the party.

As an aside, Cedric Richmond was the guy who insisted that Biden was staying in the race. He was on board right up until the end.

WATCH: Biden campaign co-chair Cedric Richmond claims it’s “absolutely false” that Biden is considering exiting the race despite widespread reports Joe is considering bowing out pic.twitter.com/d4mK405nTf

— TV News Now (@TVNewsNow) July 19, 2024

Who can blame him for being bitter today?

The post Biden Campaign Co-Chair Claims THIS is the Main Reason Joe Biden Was Pushed Out of the 2024 Race appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NY Times Poll: Majority of Registered Voters Say Trump ‘Will Bring About the Right Kind of Change’

A new poll from the New York Times has found that most registered voters believe Trump is a change agent and that he will bring the kind of change that the country needs right now.

There are two remarkable things about this poll at first glance. The fact that it’s from the New York Times, and the idea that Trump has become the change candidate.

It’s also a reminder that voters desperately want the country to go in a different direction than the one we have been headed in for three years now.

Breitbart News reports:

NYT Poll: Majority of Voters Say Trump ‘Will Bring About the Right Kind of Change’

A majority of registered voters believe former President Donald Trump “will bring about the right kind of change” for the nation, a Thursday New York Times/Siena College poll found.

Trump is campaigning on restoring the economy, boosting American jobs, securing the southern border, and preventing World War III.

“I am running to be president for all of America, not half of America, because there is no victory in winning for half of America,” Trump said in Milwaukee during his RNC acceptance speech.

Only 47 percent of registered voters said the same for Vice President Kamala Harris, whom voters also ranked as a far less “strong leader” than Trump.

Sixty percent of registered voters said Trump is a strong leader, compared to Harris’s only 46 percent.

Overall, the poll found Trump leading Harris by two points, a sign that Harris might be enjoying a “honeymoon” phase of her initial campaign for president.

Harris might get a slight polling bounce after the Democratic National Convention in August, which is to be expected, but beyond that it is probably going to be a rocky road for her campaign.

The country wants change and Kamala Harris is just more of the same.

The post NY Times Poll: Majority of Registered Voters Say Trump ‘Will Bring About the Right Kind of Change’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

FLASHBACK: Kamala Harris Was Part of Joe Biden’s Disastrous Withdrawal From Afghanistan (VIDEO)

Democrats and the media don’t like to talk about it, but Joe Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 was one of the things that led to his downfall.

You can look at a graph of Biden’s approval rating and pinpoint the exact moment of the withdrawal. His approval numbers went upside down and never recovered.

Now that the media is desperately trying to rewrite history, it’s important to remember that Kamala Harris was part of that process and even defended it months later.

Harris even tried to take credit for it.

Politico reported in April of 2021:

Harris says she had key role in Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal decision

Vice President Kamala Harris confirmed Sunday that she was the last person in the room before President Joe Biden made the decision to pull all U.S. troops out of Afghanistan.

In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” Harris was asked about being the last person in the room regarding major decisions, something that Biden has said is important to him in his working relationship with the vice president. Harris confirmed that was the case regarding the move to pull U.S. troops out of Afghanistan by Sept. 11…

“This is a president who has an extraordinary amount of courage,” she said, regarding the decision. “He is someone, who I have seen over and over again, make decisions based on what he truly believes … is the right thing to do.”

Watch the clip below:

Kamala Harris was behind the botched Afghanistan withdrawal that resulted in 13 dead American service members

Bash: “Joe Biden just made a really big decision—Afghanistan—were you the last person in the room?”

Kamala: “Yes.”

Bash: “And you feel comfortable?”

Kamala: “I do.” pic.twitter.com/qlTAt2wjTN

— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) July 26, 2024

The last 3-1/2 years have been full of bad decisions and Harris has been a part of all of them https://t.co/MAPmPAa8Gx

— thegringamex (@thegringamex) July 26, 2024

The media is trying to hype Kamala as a new Obama but it won’t work and this is one reason why. She cannot escape the fact that she has been an integral player in the failed Biden administration.

The post FLASHBACK: Kamala Harris Was Part of Joe Biden’s Disastrous Withdrawal From Afghanistan (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Political Analyst Makes Bold Prediction About Trump and the Outcome of the 2024 Election

Then-President Donald Trump holds two thumbs up at a campaign rally for incumbent Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue ahead of Senate runoff in Dalton, Georgia on Jan. 4, 2021. (Mandel Ngan – AFP / Getty Images)

Ever since the Democrats pulled their switcheroo with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the media has been trying to act like this was totally normal and that there is tremendous excitement for Harris.

It is not normal, and any bump Harris has gotten in support is likely nothing more than a sugar high which will fade quickly as voters are reminded of her record and her personality.

James Piereson is a political scholar and analyst for the Manhattan Institute. He recently wrote a column comparing Kamala Harris to failed 1988 presidential candidate Michael Dukakis, but one of the most fascinating parts of the column is a passage where he predicts the outcome of the 2024 election.

Piereson writes at The New Criterion (bolding added for emphasis):

Kamala Harris is now enjoying this kind of moment as she racks up endorsements in anticipation of the Democratic National Convention in August. Democrats and media allies are busy portraying her as a fresh face (she is not) and a youthful candidate (also doubtful) who will electrify the nation, galvanize women and minority voters, and trounce Donald Trump in the fall campaign…

The honeymoon will not last very long. Trump will succeed in painting Harris as an out-of-touch San Francisco leftist, much as Bush portrayed Dukakis as a Massachusetts liberal. Trump will find plenty of running room with that campaign, as there is hardly a left-wing cause that she has not embraced…

Notwithstanding the euphoria today, Trump will win the election by six points—forty-nine to forty-three percent—winning 339 electoral votes, including all of the so-called swing states, plus the Democratic-leaning states of Virginia, Minnesota, and New Hampshire. Republicans will pick up three or four seats in the Senate and perhaps twenty seats in the House, giving them safe majorities in both chambers. This will give Trump the margins he needs to implement a good piece of his agenda in 2025 and 2026.

This column is currently one of the most read articles on Real Clear Politics and for good reasons. Piereson makes some outstanding points based on history and research.

The post Political Analyst Makes Bold Prediction About Trump and the Outcome of the 2024 Election appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Archaeologists Just Made a ‘Sensational’ Discovery at Site Where Christ Was Resurrected

Archaeologists in Israel have made a “sensational” discovery at the site where Christ was resurrected.

Construction workers at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem discovered a long-lost medieval altar that historians previously believed had been destroyed in a fire back in 1808.

Believing they were simply repositioning a graffiti-covered stone slab, the workers discovered it was actually adorned with ribbon-like carvings, a typical Roman decorative method from medieval times.

The marble piece, weighing several tons, had been placed in a publicly accessible hallway at the church’s rear, also marked by graffiti.

Local scholars have dated the altar to 1149 based on its unique inscriptions. An Australian team from the Academy of Sciences described the finding as “sensational.”

“Firstly, the fact that the slab could have remained hidden for so long in such an intensively researched building as the Church of the Holy Sepulchre – especially as it was in view of thousands of pilgrims and tourists every day,” the team wrote, according to Mail Online.

The altar was designed in the “Cosmatesque” style, a technique originating from the Cosmati family in Rome, renowned for their multi-generational stoneworking tradition.

A mark of papal prestige, the style involved assembling small, repurposed marble fragments from older structures into intricate geometric designs.

The sole surviving example of Cosmatesque work outside of Italy is located in London’s Westminster Abbey, created by an artist sent by the pope.

“The Cosmatesque altar now rediscovered in Jerusalem must also have been created with the Pope’s blessing,’ the researchers explained.

“By sending one of the Cosmatesque masters to the Kingdom of Jerusalem to make the new high altar in Christianity’s holiest church, the Pontiff supported Christianity’s claim to the city.”

The post Archaeologists Just Made a ‘Sensational’ Discovery at Site Where Christ Was Resurrected appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Social Media Users Point to Revelation 6:8 After Paris Olympics Open Up With Rider on Pale Horse (VIDEO)

The 2024 Paris Olympics are underway, but the opening ceremony has made many spectators stop watching the games.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, during the Olympic Games opening ceremony, a group of provocatively dressed drag queens stood behind a long table, appearing to recreate the Lord’s Supper.

During another part of the opening ceremony, a pale horse raced at full speed with a rider donning an Olympic cape.

The appearance of the pale horse resulted in hundreds of social media users stating that it symbolized the pale horse spoken of in the Book of Revelation in the Bible.

Revelation 6:8 reads, “And I looked, and behold, a pale horse! And its rider’s name was Death, and Hades followed him. And they were given authority over a fourth of the earth, to kill twith sword and with famine and with pestilence and by wild beasts of the earth.”

WATCH:

If you have any doubt what is going on at the Olympics opening ceremony

A single rider on a pale horse is straight out of the book of Revelation

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto… pic.twitter.com/r4sIcAIwAG

— Vision4theBlind (@Vision4theBlind) July 26, 2024

Here what users on X had to say about the pale horse:

Behold a pale horse !!!! pic.twitter.com/4hFabSmZTI

— Luke Rudkowski (@Lukewearechange) July 26, 2024

God will not be mocked. This is blasphemy. All satanic. Boycott the Olympics. Go woke, go broke. Who is with me?

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the… pic.twitter.com/lzFAyDga1h

— Sassafrass84 (@Sassafrass_84) July 26, 2024

The 2024 Olympics has the Occult Anti-Christ symbolism on full display

Even the pale horse walking on water is a clear symbol of the Anti-Christ counterfeiting Jesus Christ walking on water

Revelation 6:8 “So I looked, and behold, a pale horse. And the name of him who sat on it… pic.twitter.com/SdV3ePxhA0

— Drew Hernandez (@DrewHLive) July 26, 2024

The Daily Mail reported that despite the bad weather, well over 600,000 people were in attendance at the opening ceremony.

Shortly after the ceremony kicked off, many people in attendance were drenched by a heavy downpour.

The post Social Media Users Point to Revelation 6:8 After Paris Olympics Open Up With Rider on Pale Horse (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Piers Morgan Slams Biden Fanboy Harry Sisson Over Unwavering Support Despite Obvious Cognitive Issues

Guest Post by Miriam Judith

British journalist Piers Morgan took a jab at Biden’s boy toy social media ‘influencer’ Harry Sisson on Thursday, mocking his continued defense of President Joe Biden’s mental sharpness.

Biden recently withdrew from the presidential race following pressure from within his own party after a disastrous debate with former President Donald Trump.

On “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” Morgan questioned Sisson’s unwavering support, especially given the widespread concerns raised after Biden’s debate performance.

“It’s painfully clear to everyone that Biden’s time was up, particularly after that debate. Why keep up the pretense that he wasn’t finished?” Morgan asked.

Sisson defended his position by outright lying about Biden’s record and the personal interactions he’s had with him, stating, “I’ve met him, and he was sharp. His achievements and policies matter more than media criticisms.”

Morgan, however, pointed out the stark contrast between Sisson’s claims and Biden’s public mishaps around that time, including stumbling, falling off stages, and making confusing statements. “He was tripping over his own feet and mumbling through speeches,” Morgan noted. “How could he have been ‘sharp’ then?”

Despite numerous White House gaffes, Sisson remained firm in his delusional belief that Biden was fit to serve. “I asked him tough questions, and he handled them well. I have no doubts about his fitness to serve,” Sisson insisted.

Watch the clip:

WATCH: @PiersMorgan confronts devout Biden supporter, 21, on his defense of the President’s mental fitness: “Why would you continue to pretend?” pic.twitter.com/Z6ZvKsaI6I

— TV News Now (@TVNewsNow) July 25, 2024

Morgan’s confrontation with Harry Sisson highlights a troubling trend among some of Biden’s most ardent defenders. Sisson’s insistence that the President is still fit for office, despite mounting evidence of cognitive decline, seems less like genuine belief and more like a delusional defense mechanism. His unwavering support, even in the face of overwhelming public and media scrutiny, paints a picture of someone who is not only out of touch with reality but also deeply committed to maintaining a narrative that suits his agenda.

Sisson’s portrayal of Biden as “sharp” and capable, based on a single favorable encounter, appears to be more about self-delusion and less about objective truth. It’s telling that he disregards the numerous instances of Biden’s public gaffes and inconsistent statements, which have been meticulously documented. By continuing to portray Biden in an unrealistic light, Sisson serves as little more than a propaganda tool, crafting a comforting but misleading narrative for his followers.

His behavior reflects a broader issue within some corners of Biden’s support base: an unwillingness to confront uncomfortable truths in favor of a more convenient fantasy. This denial not only undermines honest political discourse but also prevents meaningful discussion about the President’s fitness for office. It’s a disservice to the democratic process and to voters who deserve a clear-eyed evaluation of their leaders.

Watch the full clip:

The post Piers Morgan Slams Biden Fanboy Harry Sisson Over Unwavering Support Despite Obvious Cognitive Issues appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Watch: Host on ‘The View’ Vilely Suggests Trump Standing up for Clinton Rape Accusers Was Sexist

A much-needed cleanse of American political discourse would begin with the cancellation of one particular daytime talk show.

Then again, the daily reminder of how low-information liberals actually think about the world might have more strategic value in the long run.

On Friday’s episode of Five Bitter Dimwits Parroting Establishment Talking Points — also known as ABC’s “The View” — toxic co-host Ana Navarro hit perhaps a new low when she described former President Donald Trump as having engaged in “sexist and misogynistic” behavior for having invited three of former President Bill Clinton’s alleged rape victims to a 2016 presidential debate against then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Yes, even now, nearly eight years later, Navarro shamelessly tried to depict Hillary Clinton as the real victim.

On Oct. 9, 2016, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey appeared at the debate at Trump’s invitation. A leaked video of Trump using vile language about women had become a major campaign issue. Establishment figures who had overlooked Bill Clinton’s behavior suddenly denounced Trump’s as disqualifying.

True to form, Trump would not take the establishment’s hypocrisy lying down.

“Mr. Trump may have said some bad words, but Bill Clinton raped me and Hillary Clinton threatened me,” Broaddrick said before the debate, per the Associated Press. “I don’t think there’s any comparison.”

That same establishment, of course, has also ignored Tara Reade, who accused President Joe Biden of sexual assault.

To Navarro, however, women who accuse Democrats of rape must not receive a platform. After all, everyone knows that Trump and his voters are the real misogynists.

“I was shell shocked by how low Donald Trump and his supporters could go against Hillary Clinton on sexist and misogynist remarks,” Navarro said in a clip posted to the social media platform X.

Then, without skipping a beat, the vile co-host cited the 2016 debate as an example.

“Remember when he showed up with women who had accused Bill Clinton of sexual impropriety to the debate,” she said.

Ah yes, nothing like the euphemism “sexual impropriety” as a substitute for alleged rape. And shame on you for noticing those three women — four, if you include Reade.

Alas, another 40 excruciating seconds of pure drivel ensued.

Navarro spent that time insisting that Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democrats’ presumptive presidential nominee, has already suffered more misogynistic attacks than Hillary Clinton ever did. The co-host suggested, for instance, that Harris’ opponents have “[tried] to make her dating history an issue.”

The truth, of course, is that Harris’ opponents have cited her romantic relationship with San Francisco politician Willie Brown in the mid-1990s, from which she demonstrably derived tangible political benefits, including lucrative government jobs, as evidence that she has advanced in her career for reasons having nothing to do with merit. Her ascent to the top of the Democratic ticket without earning a single primary vote constitutes merely the latest example.

Navarro’s mindless rant concluded with an obligatory shot at Trump’s own personal history, including a rape allegation from E. Jean Carroll, who in January received an $83 million jury verdict in her favor after suing the former president for defamation.

Fake Republican Ana Navarro says it was sexist for Trump to bring Bill Clinton’s rape accusers to a debate in 2016. She decries people bringing up Kamala’s affair with Willie Brown and ridiculously suggests Trump’s sexual relations have not been made a campaign issue, YET. pic.twitter.com/JNmTpenLXy

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 26, 2024

Carroll, whose allegations closely resembled the plot line from a 2012 episode of NBC’s “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit,” deserves to be taken seriously, according to Navarro.

But we can safely ignore Jones, Broaddrick and Willey. In fact, their mere appearance at the 2016 debate was both “sexist and misogynistic.”

On the bright side, we know for certain that one day this repellent show will no longer exist. Until then, let Navarro and her fellow unhinged co-hosts serve as a daily reminder of the task we face.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Watch: Host on ‘The View’ Vilely Suggests Trump Standing up for Clinton Rape Accusers Was Sexist appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

After Floating Shrapnel Conspiracy Theory, FBI Now Says a Bullet Struck President Trump’s Ear – Trump Responds

The FBI is now saying Trump’s ear was indeed struck by a bullet on July 13 after a gunman opened fire on him during his Butler, Pennsylvania rally.

“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the FBI said in its statement.

“The FBI’s Shooting Reconstruction Team continues to examine evidence from the scene, including bullet fragments, and the investigation remains ongoing.”

FBI Statement out this hour — attributable to the agency and not a specific person:
“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle.”

— Bret Baier (@BretBaier) July 26, 2024

President Trump responded.

“I assume that’s the best apology that we’ll get from Director Wray, but it is fully accepted!” Trump said on Truth Social.

On Thursday, FBI Director Christopher Wray floated the fake news media’s conspiracy theory that Trump’s ear may have been hit by shrapnel.

“There’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel,” Wray said to Jim Jordan on Thursday.

WATCH:

FBI Director Wray: “There’s Some Question About Whether Or Not It’s A Bullet Or Shrapnel” That Hit Trump
More: https://t.co/OcjvmkoEFM pic.twitter.com/z88ILFaiuj

— RCP Video (@rcpvideo) July 25, 2024

The post After Floating Shrapnel Conspiracy Theory, FBI Now Says a Bullet Struck President Trump’s Ear – Trump Responds appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

US Government Agrees to Pay Peter Strzok $1.2 Million in Lawsuit Settlement Over Release of Anti-Trump Text Messages

The Justice Department agreed to pay former FBI special agent Peter Strzok a $1.2 settlement over the release of his anti-Trump text messages.

Peter Strzok sued the DOJ for ‘unlawfully disclosing’ his text messages to his paramour Lisa Page.

Strzok and Lisa Page discussed an “insurance policy” to keep Trump out of office.

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office…that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected…but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok text messaged to Page in an Aug. 15, 2016 exchange, referring to Andrew McCabe.

“It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok added.

Other profanity-laced text messages between Strzok and Page showed their contempt for Donald Trump.

Peter Strzok also said in a text message to Lisa Page “we’ll stop” Trump from becoming President.

Strzok was fired from the FBI in 2018 for violating bureau policies after he launched the ‘Crossfire Hurricane‘ Trump-Russia probe in July 2016.

ABC News reported:

Former FBI agent Pete Strzok, who was fired from the bureau in 2018 after his disparaging text messages about Donald Trump were made public, has reached a settlement with the Justice Department over his claims that his privacy rights were violated, according to his lawyers.

According to Strzok’s lawyers, the U.S. government has agreed to pay Strzok $1.2 million.

In his 2019 lawsuit, Strzok and his lawyers argued that the FBI and DOJ unlawfully disclosed his private text messages disparaging Trump before and after the 2016 presidential election — including the time frame during which Strzok helped lead the agency’s investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

The post US Government Agrees to Pay Peter Strzok $1.2 Million in Lawsuit Settlement Over Release of Anti-Trump Text Messages appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.