Washington, DC’s Top New Restaurant Butterworth’s is America’s Hottest Conservative Hangout — And Even Democrats Can’t Get Enough

Butterworth’s French press coffee (James Rose/The Gateway Pundit)

This week, The Gateway Pundit landed an exclusive interview with Butterworth’s chef-partner, Bart Hutchins, who took us inside his posh, yet unpretentious, bistro and bar, attracting White House staff, Congressional staff, and familiar MAGA faces, on a near-nightly basis. 

Two blocks from the Capitol building in Washington, DC, the supremely stylish American bistro, Butterworth’s, plays host to some of the heaviest power players in conservative politics – and the hot, new Capitol Hill hangout only opened for business in October 2024.

“I’ve always wanted this property; this building. I’ve been in this neighborhood most of my career, and I love this neighborhood. I would always come down here and look in the window,” Bart Hutchins told The Gateway Pundit. 

“I know my meat guy; I know the lady that owns the kitchenware store; I know the people that own the bookshop. I like knowing everybody that I buy things from. I like walking down the street and waving to people in the morning.”

“I love Capitol Hill. It got really hit by COVID. Capitol Hill turned into a wasteland.”

“When I got the chance to come do this restaurant, on Capitol Hill, specifically, I said, ‘Let’s do it, and let’s do a really good job of it. Let’s give this place something to be proud of.’” 

“The people running the Free World are right here, and they should be eating well. That’s part of our mission,” Hutchins said. 

Hutchins had long since established himself as a local legend among DC’s restauranting elite, but before Hutchins opened Butterworth’s, his business partners had to lure him away from a rural Minnesota farm, where Hutchins spent his days writing, in seclusion. 

“My business partner, Julian, started this project. He called me and said, ‘That place you always wanted – we got it. Come do it.’”

“And at first, I said, ‘No. I’m not doing another restaurant.’”

“The money is hard to come by. Food prices are insane. Labor prices are crazy. It’s a really hard business.” 

“But, at the end of the day, I couldn’t say no,” Hutchins said. 

Butterworth’s, which is ranked among the top ten new DC restaurants by the Washington Post, is co-owned by former senior advisor to Nigel Farage, former editor-in-chief of Breitbart, and co-founder of popular conservative media outlets, War Room and The National Pulse, Raheem Kassam. 

Butterworth’s namesake hails from Alex Butterworth, the senior legal counsel at Uber, who is a top investor in the Capitol Hill restaurant.

In April, 2025, this Gateway Pundit correspondent first dined at Butterworth’s, on a dinner reservation with a sophisticated, longtime Republican operative from the Reagan Administration.

We ordered a good bottle of champagne, some caviar, a Caesar salad, a blue crab bucatini, a golden vegetable risotto, and a flat iron steak. 

The bottle of dry champagne was a treat, and we could not stop drinking it. 

The meal was exceptionally flavorful and well-balanced. Every dish we ordered took on the rare quality of melting in our mouths. Slathered in top-shelf butter and oils, all the foods boasted a smooth, balanced texture. 

Butterworth’s menu items stood out as being quite reasonably priced, especially considering that the “cost of admission” likely grants customers the opportunity to dine alongside famed MAGA figures.

As a bonus, the Butterworth’s staff came across as extremely friendly and well-intentioned.

Butterworth’s beef tallow french fries (James Rose/The Gateway Pundit)

When I returned to Butterworth’s the following week to have lunch, I realized that Butterworth’s had actually become renowned for its draft pints of Guinness, and its french fries. 

Once I ordered my first pint of Guinness, I learned that the black lager kegs had all been dried out by the weekend’s customers. Days later at Butterworth’s, however, I was fortunate enough to enjoy the smoothest pint of Guinness in my life.

As it relates to Butterworth’s foods, their beef tallow french fries have become the talk of the town, by no sheer accident.

Impressively, Hutchins and his partners remain hell-bent on sourcing all ingredients from vendors and farms that supply only the freshest foods. Furthermore, Hutchins sincerely seeks to benefit his customers’ health.  

“We do the fries right. We buy Kennebec potatoes from the Amish Farmers of Pennsylvania. We cut them, and we blanche them in vinegar water. Then we blanche them in beef tallow. Then we fry them again in beef tallow, so you get this extra crunchy, perfectly golden fry. It’s the small things, where you can really make a difference for yourself,” Hutchins said.

“It’s like, are you going to take the time to do that? Are you going to buy the frozen fries, dip them in the fryer, and sell them to as many people as you can? Or, are you going to be a craftsman? Are you going to support the farmers who grow these potatoes, and then take those crops, and treat them well?”

“I call the farmers, and I say, ‘What’s coming out of the ground, right now? What’s fresh? What’s in season? Which vegetables and meats do you have?’”

“I ask them to ship it, and then we come up with a dish, from there. I don’t make a dish up in my head, and then go shopping for ingredients,” Hutchins said.

Hutchins and his partners regularly update their menus, depending on the seasonality of ingredients. Hutchins’s uncompromising practices regarding well-sourced foods have led Hutchins to the forefront on a hot button political issue. 

“One of the phenomena in my career is that I wasn’t a particularly political person when I became a chef. I am looking to attract anyone and everyone. I do have strong, political opinions about how we should eat,” Hutchins said.

“This is about a holistic system of eating. Let’s move away from these big, industrialized foods. Let’s move away from these things that are making us sick. Let’s move a little bit closer to the land, and let’s support the people who grow things the right way.”

“There are people who want to make money off us being sick, and they make food that is filled with chemicals. It’s disgusting, and it should be illegal.”

“Because it’s not illegal, your choice is to give your money to people who hate you, or you can support people who do things the right way,” Hutchins said. 

Hutchins now finds himself within the nerve center of US Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert Kennedy, Jr’s, health revolution, promoting only the most natural, American foods.

“To have the right wing join in; to have the MAHA crowd join in, is super exciting for me, because for a long time, I have said, ‘This is the way we should eat. This is the way we should live.’”

“MAHA has brought in a sort of young, right-wing crowd to that style of eating, and I am excited about it, because we should all be eating that way.”

“There is a way to eat that is right, good, and better for us. And there is a way to eat that is poisonous, and killing us. I think everybody – chefs, home cooks, and parents – should really be looking at our food in that way. Start with what’s coming out of the ground,” Hutchins said.

For lunch at Butterworth’s, I was served – on a silver platter – extra crispy beef tallow french fries, with garlic and chive oil aioli.

Then, I savored my order of lavishly soft scrambled eggs, topped with crème fraiche and chives, on a robust slice of sourdough. 

Finally, I washed down my lunch with a steaming pot of French Press coffee from the Butterworth’s partners’ own proprietary coffee line. 

I lounged on a couch inside the conservative movement’s top new social hangout that now serves a growing number of Democratic congressmen and Capitol Hill staffers, as well.

Evidently, in Bart Hutchins’s view, his elegant and charming Butterworth’s offers a refuge from the harsher realities of Washington, DC.

“The capital city should be an example of what we want the country to look like and feel like. Right now it looks sort of forgotten, and run down, and left to rot. I think beautifying the entire country starts with beautifying DC. Our streets should be cleaned regularly. Our streets should be beautiful. There should be green grass everywhere. There should be trees everywhere,” Hutchins said.

“Our [Butterworth’s] interior is a maximalist interior. We love our old books that are on the shelf; we love our old chandeliers; we love that we bought all of our plates secondhand through estate sales and thrift stores. They are all made out of real china.”

“For the design, I think we are looking at old London lunch clubs. We are really looking to the old world for design inspiration.”

“There is a lot in the works. We are going to finish the basement. So, we will go from two floors, to three floors, here at Butterworth’s,” Hutchins said. 

Butterworth’s future appears every bit as bright as the MAGA and MAHA movements themselves.

The post Washington, DC’s Top New Restaurant Butterworth’s is America’s Hottest Conservative Hangout — And Even Democrats Can’t Get Enough appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

THIS DAY IN HYSTERIA: New at Intellectual Froglegs with Joe Dan Gorman – Out this Week!

Joe Dan Gorman released his latest video at Intellectual Froglegs this week.

Who is Joe Dan Gorman you ask?

In 2012 Joe Dan created Intellectual Froglegs, and by 2013 was nominated for Video Blogger of the Year at CPAC in Washington DC.

Anyone who watches Intellectual Froglegs gets it: in this era of ideologue ranting and raving on TV, thirty minutes of music-packed, hilarious video is an absolute vacation for the psyche!

Joe Dan gathers the best snippets of Obama, Hillary, Schumer, Biden and San Fran Nan and more, sets those videos to rocking tunes and commentary, and entertains while educating the viewer. Oh, those radical Lefties in the country would stroke out if they watched, but everyone else with so much as a grain of common sense falls in love with the episodes.

Joe Dan is funny, fun and smart. His videos are the best, which is why he has been able to do what he does for so long. He’s been censored numerous times by YouTube which is a testament to his effectiveness. As a result, he has found other methods and sites to share his very funny and smart shows.

Joe Dan has provided the following insights on the show:

The Speed of Trump indeed…

Actually, it’s the speed of God, with Trump behind the wheel.

The Democrats and their media are completely hysterical,

Every. single. day.

Focusing on the low IQ issues that they and their readers can follow…

Signal messages, blue suits, MS13 members & men pretending to be women.… while actual ‘issues of importance’ are too complex for their twisted little brains.

These are not smart people. What’s more, these are people who don’t believe in God…trying to challenge God.

In order for President Trump to complete his mission… he needs our complete support, whatever it might look like… whether lighting up the phones of worthless congressmen or spreading the word to friends and family.

I’ve also noticed that President Trump has really increased the frequency that he talks about the importance of our Lord and Savior. This is really good.

We really need to pray for our friends over in secular Europe to turn back to God. Actually, they’re no longer secular — they’ve become anti-Christian. And extremely pro Muslim.

Keep praying.

WATCH:



The post THIS DAY IN HYSTERIA: New at Intellectual Froglegs with Joe Dan Gorman – Out this Week! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

No One Is Above the Law: When Will Tom Homan and ICE Arrest and Deport Ilhan Omar for Marrying Her Brother and Committing Immigration Fraud?

Ilhan Omar with her second husband and brother during better times. She allegedly married her brother to gain him access to the US. This is also called immigration fraud.

According to her limited bio on the far-left Wikipedia, Ilhan Omar divorced her second husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, in 2011.

Ilhan’s second husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, is her brother.

The two were legally married on February 12, 2009, and divorced in 2011.

Democrat Ilhan Omar married her biological brother.

Power Line reported on this scandal years ago:

A reader has written us to point out that the Somali website Somalispot posted information last week suggesting Omar’s involvement in marriage and immigration fraud. The post notes that Omar married Ahmed Hirsi in 2002. Hirsi is the father of Omar’s three children. Omar is depicted with Hirsi and their children on Omar’s campaign website here.

The post further notes that Omar married her brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, implying that the latter marriage assisted his entry into the United States. Her brother was a British citizen. “As soon as Ilhan Omar married him,” the post continues, “He started university at her [a]lma mater North Dakota State University where he graduated in 2012. Shortly thereafter, he moved to Minneapolis where he was living in a public housing complex and was later evicted. He then returned to the United Kingdom where he now lives.”

Ilhan Omar was elected to be a state representative for District 60B on November 8, 2016, and took her oath on the Quran.

In 2017, several months after Omar’s marriage history briefly created a national news item, Omar quietly petitioned the family court for a default divorce, claiming she could not locate Elmi.

She was suspected of using campaign donations to pay for the divorce… from her brother.

Ilhan is currently married to her political consultant.

There is a vast amount of evidence that Ilhan Omar married her brother to commit immigration fraud.

More from the Daily Mail:

For the first time, one of those friends has come forward to reveal exactly how Omar and Ahmed Elmi scandalized the Somali community in Minneapolis.

Abdihakim Osman is the first person to go on record to speak of how Omar said she wanted to get her brother papers so he could stay in the United States, at a time when she was married to her first husband Ahmed Hirsi.

But hardly anyone realized that meant marrying him.

‘No one knew there had been a wedding until the media turned up the marriage certificate years later,’ Osman, 40, exclusively told DailyMail.com.

[…]

It has long been rumored that Omar and Elmi are brother and sister.

But because of a lack of paperwork in war-torn Somalia where they were both born, positive proof of their relationship has never been uncovered.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that Representative Ilhan Omar married her brother to facilitate immigration fraud.

In July 2019, Trump stated, “There’s a lot of talk about the fact that she was married to her brother. I know nothing about it,” referencing the rumor without providing evidence.

He reiterated this accusation during a rally in Ocala, Florida, in October 2020, asserting that Omar “married her brother, came in illegally,” and called for the Department of Justice to investigate her.

“If you look at the House with Pelosi and these people, it’s like they hate Israel and they believe in Omar, who came in here and married her brother or something, came in illegally,” he said. “Come on Justice, let’s go Justice, Department of Justice.”

Omar has consistently denied the accusation, calling it “absurd and offensive.” In response to a 2025 social media post claiming to confirm the rumor, she replied, “The only thing that is confirmed is your stupidity. Hope that helps.”

So, when will ICE arrest Omar and send her home to Somalia?

No one is above the law—not even Ilhan Omar.

The post No One Is Above the Law: When Will Tom Homan and ICE Arrest and Deport Ilhan Omar for Marrying Her Brother and Committing Immigration Fraud? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Continues Firing Spree — Terminates Nation’s Top Copyright Official at Library of Congress Following Ouster of Radical Obama-Appointed Librarian

Shira Perlmutter (Credit: Library of Congress)

Just days after firing radical Obama appointee Carla Hayden — the embattled Librarian of Congress accused of injecting far-left gender ideology into children’s materials — Trump has now terminated U.S. Copyright Office Director Shira Perlmutter, the highest-ranking copyright official in the nation.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that watchdog group American Accountability Foundation (AAF) demanded that both Hayden and Perlmutter be removed for using their taxpayer-funded positions to push progressive dogma instead of protecting intellectual property and American values.

“The President and his team have done an admirable and long-needed job cleaning out deep state liberals from the federal government,” AAF told the Daily Mail in late April.

“It is time they show Carla Hayden and Shira Perlmutter the door and return an America First agenda to the nation’s intellectual property regulation.”

And that’s exactly what President Trump just did.

President Trump abruptly fired the Democrat Librarian of Congress on Thursday.

Hayden, appointed by Obama in 2016, made history as the first black woman to serve as Librarian of Congress — but conservatives argue her legacy is one of radicalism, not scholarship. Under her watch, the Library of Congress became a platform for leftist identity politics, including drag queen story hours, LGBTQ+ children’s literature showcases, and DEI initiatives laced with CRT buzzwords.

Now, Trump has fired her hand-picked protégé: Shira Perlmutter, Director of the U.S. Copyright Office.

According to Politico, Perlmutter was informed Saturday afternoon that her position had been “terminated,” effective immediately.

According to the Daily Mail:

Hayden appointed Shira Perlmutter as the Director of U.S. Copyright Office in 2020 which has also raised concerns from activists as she made extensive political donations to former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former President Barack Obama and New York Democratic senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer.

The organization raised concerns about Perlmutter’s support for European-style online censorship and endorsing a ‘three strikes’ rule for individuals downloading copyrighted material on the internet.

‘Good things are beginning to come to pass’ as a result of the draconian rule, she explained at a forum, prior to her appointment in the copyright office.

Rep. Joe Morelle (D-NY), the top Democrat on the House Administration Committee, fumed that the firing of Perlmutter was “no coincidence” and blamed Trump for acting in retaliation after Perlmutter reportedly refused to “rubber-stamp” tech billionaire Elon Musk’s ability to use publicly available works to train AI models.

Donald Trump’s termination of Register of Copyrights, Shira Perlmutter, is a brazen, unprecedented power grab with no legal basis.

It’s surely no coincidence he acted less than a day after she refused to rubber-stamp Elon Musk’s efforts to mine troves of copyrighted works to…

— Joe Morelle (@RepJoeMorelle) May 10, 2025

The post Trump Continues Firing Spree — Terminates Nation’s Top Copyright Official at Library of Congress Following Ouster of Radical Obama-Appointed Librarian appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Announces National Center for Homeless Vets to Be Paid for with Funds Previously Used to House Illegal Immigrants

American last is out; America first is in.

Fox News reported Friday that President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish a center for homeless veterans titled, “KEEPING PROMISES TO VETERANS AND ESTABLISHING A NATIONAL CENTER FOR WARRIOR INDEPENDENCE.”

This order will create the National Center for Warrior Independence in Los Angeles, California on the Veterans Affairs campus.

This funding, Fox says, will come from money previously used on illegal immigrants.

If this is not a total reversal, then what is?

According to the LA VA website, the center was established in 1887 through a grant from former Republican Sen. John Percival Jones,  Arcadia Bandini de Baker, and John Wolfskill.

Trump writes this once great place declined over time, not accommodating veterans and allowing other entities to use the property for other means.

“The Department of Veterans Affairs (Department) leased parts of the property to a private school, private companies, and the baseball team of the University of California, Los Angeles, sometimes at significantly below-market prices,” the order reads.

Communicating the problem of homelessness for veterans, Trump said, “As of 2024, there were approximately 3,000 homeless veterans in Los Angeles, more than in any other city in the country and accounting for about 10 percent of all of America’s homeless veterans.  Many of these heroes live in squalor in Los Angeles’s infamous ‘skid row.’”

His new initiative aims to change that.

Fox highlighted the order aims to allow veterans to receive care, benefits, various services, treatment for substance abuse, and to work with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to use vouchers as a part of the president’s effort to house veterans there.

The order’s goal is housing up to 6,000 homeless veterans by 2028.

In March 2023, the Federation for American Immigration Reform estimated the net cost of illegal immigration at the beginning of that year to be $150 billion.

During the term of former President Joe Biden, we saw outrageous steps taken to accommodate people illegally entering our country, some of these efforts are ongoing.

It seems like a no-brainer that America’s veterans should take priority over illegal immigrants, but Biden – suspected to be missing a brain – could not figure that out.

We have our priorities completely backwards if we leave those who served to live in misery and squalor on the street while pampering people who do not even belong here.

This should not be a partisan issue. Democrats and Republicans alike should applaud and support the president in this effort.

It is just the right thing to do.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Trump Announces National Center for Homeless Vets to Be Paid for with Funds Previously Used to House Illegal Immigrants appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Administration Petitions Supreme Court to Revoke Legal Status of Over 500,000 Illegal Aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela

The Trump administration has issued a bold challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court, demanding the revocation of temporary legal status for 530,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This move aims to untangle the migratory mess left by the Biden administration, which unleashed a flood of entries under the questionable guise of “humanitarian parole.”

The Department of Justice, in its filing on Thursday, argues that Biden’s program, launched in 2022 and expanded in 2023, flouts federal law. It allowed migrants to arrive by air with U.S. sponsors, but for Trump, this is nothing more than a progressive ploy to swamp the country with unchecked immigration, bypassing legal pathways.

In April, Judge Indira Talwani, an Obama appointee, blocked the status revocation, insisting on individual reviews. For conservatives, this reeks of Democratic favoritism, more concerned with votes than national security. In states like Texas, local communities are already feeling the strain: overcrowded schools and stretched public services.

Trump Admin Asks Supreme Court to Revoke 530,000 Immigrants’ Temporary Status https://t.co/EQ3XzB0Ufa

— Morgan Steele (@JohnBates774380) May 8, 2025

The Department of Homeland Security, led by Kristi Noem, notified those affected in March to leave by April 24 or face deportation. Talwani halted this measure, leaving thousands in legal limbo and fueling the left’s victimhood narrative, which loves to cast Trump as the villain.

The Supreme Court request not only seeks to scrap the parole but also to reaffirm presidential authority to manage immigration without activist judges meddling. Republicans see a chance to dismantle policies that have ballooned public spending: in 2024, the cost of supporting migrants topped $150 billion, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.

Biden’s program, initially for Venezuelans and later extended, was a response to the southern border crisis. But conservatives argue it only encouraged more arrivals, many with questionable grounds to stay. The left, true to form, cries that Trump’s measure is heartless.

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow cancellation of legal status for 500,000 immigrants

Source: Politico

Shared via the Google app https://t.co/Ap9JTTFj16

— Capt. Mark Esher (@CruiseNavyFL) May 9, 2025

Pro-immigrant groups, ever ready to wave the “rights” flag, slam the Republican stance. Yet conservatives counter that the real harm comes from a migration system that strangles citizens and rewards lawlessness.

The Supreme Court battle will be pivotal. A Trump victory would set a precedent for prioritizing law over sentimentality. A loss would prolong the chaos so cherished by progressives.

In places like El Paso, where shelters overflow and local taxes climb, people are fed up. Trump’s resolve resonates with those who want an orderly nation, not a backyard for the globalist agenda.

The left will keep whining, but conservatives cheer a leader who puts America first. This isn’t an attack on migrants but a defense of legality, sovereignty, and American prosperity.

In a world where borders blur, Trump stands firm for the values that made America great: law, order, and national pride. May the Supreme Court rule with wisdom, because the people demand a secure and strong nation.

The post Trump Administration Petitions Supreme Court to Revoke Legal Status of Over 500,000 Illegal Aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WINNING! Trump Has Cut National Debt Growth by 92 Percent

Trump has been in office for only a few months and has already managed to cut national debt growth by 92 percent. This is definitely one of the things that would cause people to say, ‘I voted for this.’

While the left rants and raves over cuts to various government programs, Trump is securing the nation’s financial future by getting spending under control.

And remember, while Trump and Republicans are taking care of this serious business, Democrats are obsessing over and defending illegal immigrant criminals.

The contrast could not be sharper.

The Washington Examiner reports:

Trump has slowed national debt growth by 92%

For all the negative headlines hating on President Donald Trump‘s Department of Government Efficiency, daily data from the Treasury Department have vindicated the president’s crusade against our obese federal budget. Even without the trillions of dollars expected to come with Trump’s “one big, beautiful bill,” the White House has slowed the growth of federal debt held by the public so dramatically that the total national debt has actually shrunk since Inauguration Day.

Admittedly, the $5.5 billion decline in a $26.2 trillion national debt is a drop in the bucket, but focusing specifically on the trajectory of the debt held by the public — that is, the majority of the national debt that is financed through the likes of Treasurys, rather than intragovernmental holdings, which is merely money one agency may owe another — we can see that the second Trump administration has indeed taken a machete to federal spending.

From Inauguration Day to May 5, debt held by the public rose by $37,238,323,646.66. Because this accounts for an influx of revenue around April Tax Day, the comparable window to compare Trump’s performance to that of his predecessor is not Trump’s first 104 days with the last 104 days of Joe Biden (when debt held by the public rose by $521,984,501,224.88), but to the same window in 2024.

From Jan. 22, 2024, to May 6, 2024, debt held by the public rose by $478,402,286,425.95.

Still, that means that the growth in our outstanding national debt fell by an astounding 92%.

For decades now, every president has talked about doing something about our national debt. Trump is actually doing it.

Trump has slowed national debt growth by 92%https://t.co/Sn1GU8zKUC

— GOP (@GOP) May 8, 2025

Democrats and the media will try to find some way to spin this negatively, but only because they don’t want Trump to succeed. The truth is that this is excellent news for the whole country.

The post WINNING! Trump Has Cut National Debt Growth by 92 Percent appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Workaholics of the World, Unite!

Workaholics of the World, Unite!

What’s so bad about idle hands, anyway?


Credit: Pheelings media/Shutterstock

It’s time to train people not to do the jobs of the past, but to do the great jobs of the future. You know, this is the new model where you work in these kinds of plants for the rest of your life and your kids work here and your grandkids work here…. Now you should see an auto plant, it’s highly automated but the people, the 4–5,000 people who work there, they are trained to take care of those robotic arms.

-Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick

One in three Europeans say they might leave their jobs if American workplace culture continues to infect their places of employment. A survey of 1,000 employees in Italy, France, Spain, Germany and the United Kingdom, written up in a trade journal called Human Resources Director, found that 86 percent of survey participants said U.S. corporate culture is influencing their own companies, and not for the better. 

Almost half (48 percent) say they would consider quitting if their “work-life balance” is hurt by policies originating in this country. Eight in 10, per Human Resources Director, “are worried that high-profile leaders under the Trump administration, such as Elon Musk, will have a negative influence on workplace culture in their country.” 

People on the other side of the Atlantic are especially worried about whether they will lose their “right to disconnect.” I had to google “right to disconnect” to find out what it means. It means they don’t have to be checking their emails constantly, like late at night and on weekends. I learned that, working on this article at 11 p.m. on Sunday. 

I think our European friends have a point. Americans have convinced themselves that working hard is a virtue in itself. The Wall Street Journal reports that “world-striding executives and businesspeople” are now waking up at 4 a.m., so you can bet they’ll be expecting their hirelings to do the same before long. In Josef Pieper’s 1952 book Leisure: the Basis of Culture he said that while post-war rebuilding was underway, Europeans came to believe that until that was done, “the only thing that matters is to strain every nerve.” Americans have been doing this, too, and except for Pearl Harbor, we weren’t even bombed. 

It’s in our blood. George Washington felt he had done a great service chopping down that cherry tree. When he was done, he filled out a timesheet and invoiced his father. Ben Franklin was wrong. Leisure is not “the time for doing something useful,” and on some level, he knew it. Franklin claimed to be “the laziest man in the world. I invented all those things to save myself from toil.” Thomas Jefferson, who managed to avoid manual labor by having people he owned do it for him, believed that of all the “cankers of human happiness none corrodes with so silent, yet so baneful an influence, as indolence.” 

Pieper, to be fair, was by no means advocating indolence. As his title suggests, he believed that a cultivated leisure was essential to the development of a healthy culture. But I’m beginning to believe that, in this hard-charging world, we could use a little more indolence.

I’ll say more. Laziness, in this country, has never received the respect it deserves. “Idle hands” have gotten a bad rap. There are far worse things than staring at a sunset with no ulterior motive. Or spending an entire afternoon fishing for bluegill without trying to “feed the family.” 

I think the “right to disconnect” should be the 28th Amendment, but I do not expect our caffeinated president—who is tweeting even before those “world-striding executives” get out of bed—to agree. Remote work could be great for people with small children, if they were allowed to do their job without constant interruption from their place of employment. Or having to check to make sure they haven’t been interrupted. A chirpy late-night text from the boss should never be defended by claiming it is healthy social interaction. It’s not. 

My favorite tagline is from La-Z-Boy. That’s the company that keeps more than 11,000 people busy day and night manufacturing recliners they probably never get a spare moment to enjoy. La-Z-Boy’s slogan is “Embrace the Lazy.” That’s my new mantra, and I think all American workaholics should adopt it as theirs as well.

Next time an eager-beaver coworker comes to you with a great idea, pause, look thoughtful and say, “Let me sleep on it.” 

The post Workaholics of the World, Unite! appeared first on The American Conservative.

The Chinese Way of Winning

The Chinese Way of Winning

Beijing is playing weiqi with the U.S., planning to beat us in the new great game.


Credit: Chill Chillz/Shutterstock

Sobering headline in The Wall Street Journal: “Xi Is Ratcheting Up China’s Pain Threshold for a Long Fight With Trump.” 

The hottest issue, of course, is trade. Negotiations are in an uncertain state, which seems to be, in fact, the new normal. Plenty more flashpoints, too, including Taiwan, other territorial claims in the Pacific, and the latest threat, Deep Seek, the nimble Chinese AI that seems to be, in fact, a sinister twofer: both a copycat and spyware. 

In the Journal’s words, “The Chinese leader wants to harden his country specifically for a confrontation with the U.S., urging officials to engage in what he calls ‘extreme scenario thinking.’” Reaching back to its roots, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs circulated a video of communist supremo Mao Zedong, declaiming in 1953 about the then-raging Korean War: “No matter how long this war will last, we’ll never yield.” 

Americans may be a little fuzzy on that conflict, in which nearly 34,000 American GIs died. Yet the Chinese remember it better, as some 150,000 of their soldiers—all “volunteers,” supposedly having rushed to the front to repel the Yankee imperialists—died on nearby territory. Indeed, the regime never lets its people forget; to the CCP, the fight against the USA is a major validator. 

For his part, Donald Trump, too, is talking tough: “We’re taking back our country from a sick political class that got rich selling America out and bleeding America dry… After decades of politicians who destroyed Detroit to build up Beijing, you finally have a champion for workers in the White House—and instead of putting China First, I am putting Michigan first and I’m putting America First.”

So it’s America First vs. China First. But how, exactly, could this competition be manifested? To be sure, the CCP regime is spending heavily on its military—although not so much as the U.S. Perhaps the PRC has achieved significant cost-savings by sponging up U.S. intellectual property (IP); many of its weapons do, in fact, look like knockoffs of American designs. 

On the overall issue of Chinese IP theft, it’s interesting that this is one topic on which the Trumpified FBI still links to the words of former director Christopher Wray: “The greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality, is the counterintelligence and economic espionage threat from China.” 

About now, foreign policy realists and the restraint-minded might be asking themselves: Is there any way out of this cycle of great-power competition—this Thucydides Trap, this cold-war, risking a hot war? Perhaps a President Rand Paul would treat these issues in such a way as to moot the Blob and its hawkish presuppositions. 

Yet sometimes, war comes anyway. Belgium wasn’t looking for a war in 1914, or 1940, and yet war came. Even those with an essentially defensive outlook still need to think about defense. 

So now to Donald Trump. The 47th president is often thought to be the most realpolitik-oriented commander-in-chief since the 34th president, Dwight Eisenhower. Trump’s hopes for settling the Ukraine War seem to echo, in fact, the way Ike settled the Korean War, and Trump seems eager to avoid other conflicts. 

As for Xi, no doubt Trump would love to make a “big, beautiful deal” with him. Yet the Thucydidean forces of tragic history might be so strong as to thwart an entente.

Meanwhile, the arms race continues. The U.S. boasts 11 aircraft carriers, while the Chinese have three, with a fourth on the way. Also, China builds 50 percent of the world’s ships, while the U.S. builds just 0.1 percent—although Trump has a plan to up that share. Regarding this rivalry, the historical-tragical mind sees echoes of the early 20th century British–German contest to build the biggest dreadnought. 

Today, it’s possible that the Chinese have gained a big edge on a different kind of nautical equipment: landing barges, the kind that could be used to invade Taiwan. (In 2022, this author ventured a solution for Taiwan that, it’s safe to say, has never made it into any Blob briefing paper.) 

Yet for the most part, CCP China has avoided direct competition with the U.S. Is that because China is weak? Or because it’s clever? Some 2,500 years ago, the military philosopher Sun Tzu wrote, “All warfare is based on deception… We must make the enemy believe we are far away.” To be sure, all militaries have stealthy traditions, and yet the Chinese have been more inscrutable than most. 

Back in the 1980s, Deng Xiaoping set the Sun Tzu tone: “Hide Your Strength, Bide Your Time.” China played the “developing country” card: Don’t mind us, we’re very poor. Indeed, to this day, China gets a small amount of foreign aid money from the U.S., more from the European Union, and much more from the World Bank. 

The American political system hardly noticed when PRC agents overcame their presumed poverty and poured cash into Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign. And we also barely noticed that, at the same time, the PRC gained much of our satellite technology. 

These were, after all, the days when the U.S. and China declared themselves to be “strategic partners.” Clinton brought China into the World Trade Organization, while George W. Bush looked into the Chinese soul and saw an ally in the “global war on terror.” 

In 2017, Xi traveled to Davos, posing as the champion of globalism—in contrast to you-know-who. Why, the Chinese argue that they are upholding the liberal world’s green climate aspirations—even as they themselves are still building coal-burning plants. 

All this maneuvering has given the PRC fans in high places, such as The New York Times’s Tom Friedman, who has been writing in praise of the communist regime for decades; just in April, filing from Shanghai, his Steffens-esque headline: “I Just Saw the Future: It Was Not in America.”

In response to Chinese strategery and Western dupery, America-Firsters need to think harder. One path to enlightenment is revisiting classic studies of China’s martial ways. One such is Scott Boorman’s 1969 tome, The Protracted Game: A Wei-Chi Interpretation of Maoist Revolutionary Strategy. 

Weiqi (transliterated wei-chi in some earlier systems of romanization) is the national strategy game of China; it is to the Chinese what chess is to Westerners, enjoyed by intellectuals and generals (plus admittedly, plenty of nerds). Also known by its Japanese name, go, weiqi is played with simple, undifferentiated pieces, called stones, white vs. black, on a flat grid. Unlike chess, once a stone is put down on the board, it can never be moved. But it can be removed—if the opposing player succeeds in surrounding it. That’s the object of the game, to defeat the other player by wiping out his forces and occupying the most space on the board. In Boorman’s words, victory comes from “sitting the enemy to death.” 

In terms of motion and action, weiqi makes chess seem like pinball. In fact, playing weiqi is more like assembling a jigsaw puzzle, even as you seek to disassemble the opponent’s pieces. 

Boorman writes that Mao Zedong was an “avid” player of weiqi. He applied all his wiles over two decades as he led the communists to their 1949 victory over the Chinese government, led by Chiang Kai-shek. 

In a 1938 pamphlet, Mao wrote that the Reds’ struggle was 

rather like a game of wei-chi. Campaigns and battles fought by the two sides resemble the capturing of each other’s pieces, and the establishment of enemy strongholds (such as Taiyuan) and our guerrilla base areas (such as the Wutai Mountains) resembles moves to dominate spaces on the board.

Boorman adds, “The underlying dynamic of Communist mobilization technique was encirclement, in direct analogy with that key wei-chi process.” 

In a war of weiqi, the risk is that you wake up one day and realize that you’re surrounded and overwhelmed. In that same 1938 pamphlet, Mao added, a bit ominously, “If the game of wei-chi is extended to include the world, there is yet a third form of encirclement as between us and the enemy.” (Emphasis added.)

After Mao’s victory in 1949, American politics was vexed by the question, “Who lost China?” Now, eight decades later, we’re asking, “Who helped China get so strong?” There is an even more urgent question: “How do we defend ourselves?” Answering that means examining all the possible threats.

Some say there’s a fifth column in North America. Yet in addition, there seem to be many more infiltrating columns. The Spectator observed, “Scratch at almost any major US political story and sooner or later you’ll hit a big red nerve that belongs to the Chinese Communist party.” Going beyond familiar—but serious—concerns such as trade, cyber theft, counterfeiting, rare earth monopolization, and fentanyl, The Spectator focused on China’s $1 billion investment toward influencing Harvard’s “IP.”

Want more to worry about? Think drones. They’re obviously mobile, and yet their mere presence in the U.S. gives them a potential weiqi vibe of wait and see. According to a 2024 report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a single Chinese company, DJI, accounts for 80 percent of world drone production; in the U.S. market, it’s 90 percent. 

So here’s a question: If the Chinese make our drones; could they, potentially, turn them against us? Like so many flying Frankensteins? Trojan horses? (Two years ago here at The American Conservative, this author considered some of the implications for homeland security.) 

If we escalate up the sneakiness scale, there’s the issue of Covid-19—how it came to be, and how it got loose. Was it a Chinese bio-weapon? That’s the emerging consensus: One close observer, Dr. Richard H. Ebright, blames China for unleashing a pandemic that killed 20 million and cost the world economy $25 trillion. Oh, but wait: According to Ebright (and many others), the Wuhan Bat Lady must share credit with Dr. Anthony Fauci and all the other American gain-of-functioneers. So maybe the PRC has at least something of a point when it seeks to shift blame for Covid onto Americans—at least a few Americans. 

Interestingly, the same Rand Paul is now leading the Covid-origin investigation for the U.S. Senate. That’s encouraging in terms of fearless truth-telling, and yet it’s also a reminder that even a hardcore libertarian will find himself enmeshed in China concerns. Even avowed non-interventionists must realize that other countries might be plotting to intervene here. 

Another huge window of vulnerability is AI. Last year, the Hudson Institute’s Arthur Herman wrote, 

China was paving the way toward an AI-dominated future none of us wants. For the past seven years, China has been moving ahead with its plans to become the world’s AI superpower. This includes building the next high-tech industrial revolution for victory on the battlefield and creating a total surveillance multiverse.

Mindful that anything digital is AI-able, we should look askance at all Chinese electronics and software in America, starting with TikTok. That popular app is routinely found to have delivered troves of personal data back to its Chinese masters. 

There’s also that new kid on the AI block, DeepSeek. This Chinese company burst on the scene earlier this year offering supposed technical superiority in the “AIrms race,” even as it fended off questions as to its exact provenance and its true purpose. In the words of a 2025 report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, “DeepSeek presents risks … to the United States’ partners and allies, as well as the tech industry.”

The report found, for instance, that because DeepSeek was sloppily built, it lacks basic security protocols. So American AIs, such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini (last year, this author mocked an earlier version; it’s gotten better since) are many times more effective at thwarting hacks than DeepSeek. 

In April, the U.S. House Select Committee on Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party (yes, that’s its exact name) declared, 

DeepSeek represents a profound threat to our nation’s security. Although it presents itself as just another AI chatbot, offering users a way to generate text and answer questions, closer inspection reveals that the app siphons data back to the People’s Republic of China, creates security vulnerabilities for its users, and relies on a model that covertly censors and manipulates information pursuant to Chinese law.

Of course, conservatives might be thinking, None of these companies, on either side of the Pacific, are to be trusted. It’s hard to argue that point, but we can say of American companies that there’s always the hope they can be made to operate within the metes and bounds of the U.S. Constitution. Of a bad-actor American company, we can still ask, Compared to what? 

In the meantime, we haven’t fully fathomed that DeepSeek is now everywhere in American life: on smart phones, in crypto, and even in HR. Indeed, given the inherent interconnectedness of the internet, it’s possible, even likely, that the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans is now sitting in Chinese databases. So as we think about it, the idea of a fifth column, or a sixth or seventh or eighth column, might need to be revised into infinity.

Can American regulators and defenders keep up? Let’s hope so, because there’s more trouble coming, as other Chinese companies, including Huawei and Alibaba, debut their AIs. In fact, the PRC brags that it has built an AI “supermarket.” 

Just last month Xi Jinping told the CCP Politburo, according to a readout translated by ace Sinologist Bill Bishop, “AI can become an international public good that benefits all humanity.” My considerably freer translation: Just as we gained worldwide market share by dumping cheap goods, let’s now cut prices to insinuate our AI into everything around the world, positioning our tech like so many surrounding weiqi pieces. Then, whenever we want to, we can remove opposing stones and occupy their spaces. 

Here’s how a conference this month at the American Enterprise Institute summarized China’s strategy: “Rather than competing for AGI [Artificial General Intelligence, the next step for AI] breakthroughs, China’s race is about embedding AI throughout its economy as quickly as possible.” In other words, let the Americans spend money building the niftiest tech—which the PRC can likely then steal, anyway. In the meantime, if Chinese AI is embedded (nice weiqi image) everywhere, from China to other cooperating (or unwitting) countries, Beijing wins the great game. 

Mind-boggling tech brings forth nightmare forebodings, straight out of The Twilight Zone or Black Mirror: We wake up one day surrounded by our own machines—which are now their machines. 

Yet there’s more: Digital updates notwithstanding, weiqi is eternally about the patient positioning of hard physical objects. The weiqi-minded might see in those impassive stones the inspiration for a devilish plan in line with Xi’s call for “extreme scenario thinking.” 

For instance: Is it possible that the PRC has put down “sleeper” nuclear weapons, or other weapons of mass destruction, inside the U.S.? Given the porous-to-open borders of the last three decades—punctuated only by brief periods of Trumpian closure—is it really so hard to imagine that the PRC might have snuck in weapons, or the components of weapons, for later assembly and use? Just like stones in weiqi, these pre-positioned weapons would sit passively, tucked away under American cities, never moving, always waiting. There’d be no need for launch rockets, or guidance systems, just a way of detonating them if the call ever came from Beijing.

The point here isn’t to give the Chinese ideas about devastating America. After all, plenty of thrillers have treated sneak-nukes already, including Tom Clancy’s 1991 best-seller, The Sum of All Fears. After 9/11, plenty more grim scenarios were war-gamed.

Yet China is a lot smarter than was Al Qaeda. The Chinese play quiet weiqi, not noisy jihad. Americans should be reminded: When studying potential enemies, we must understand the game they are playing—which might be much different than the game we like to play. If the Chinese know weiqi and its politico-military applications, then we must be sedulous students—and effective counter-players. 

Knowledge is power, and power keeps the peace.

The post The Chinese Way of Winning appeared first on The American Conservative.

Hooray for Hollywood 

Hooray for Hollywood 

President Trump wants to Make Tinseltown Great Again. 

(By Maks Ershov/Shutterstock)

President Donald Trump is not known for displays of magnanimity, but his offer of a helping hand to flailing and failing studios in Hollywood must be considered just that. 

In a Truth Social missive last week, Trump expressed his commitment to the American movie industry by advocating for tariffs on overseas productions—in spite of the fact that the movers and shakers of that same industry are almost universally aligned against the 47th president.

“The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death,” Trump wrote, deploying his inconsistent but strangely intuitive approach to capitalization. “Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated.”

This is inarguably true—just ask The New York Times, which, in a story dated April 19, issued the following dire dispatch: “In the past few years, as labor costs have grown after two strikes, producers of reality shows, scrappy indie movies and blockbuster films have increasingly turned away from Los Angeles to filming locations overseas.” The story quoted a producer named Beau Flynn: “This is an existential crisis—it’s an extinction event.”

So, uh, Trump was right?

In another illustration of the veracity of the maxim that no good deed goes unpunished, Trump’s valiant attempt to reestablish Southern California as the locus of moviemaking has been met with expressions of bafflement and ridicule among many of those the policy is intended to benefit. “Next year, The White Lotus is going to be set at a Hampton Inn,” carped the insufferable Jimmy Kimmel.

No one can yet judge the efficacy of Trump’s proposed tariff scheme or of the subsequent revelation of other proposed measures in furtherance of Golden State-based movie production, including federal tax credits. What is clear, however, is that Trump’s preference for Hollywood-based moviemaking has a strong historical precedent—one that makes him an almost hilariously unlikely fellow traveler with some of the great film critics of the last century.

In The American Cinema: Directors and Directions, 1929-1968—his classic text on the major (and minor) practitioners of Hollywood cinema—Andrew Sarris attacked the erroneous notion, popular among some critics, that foreign films were, by some sort of holy writ, superior to those made in Hollywood. Acknowledging the “serious cults of the foreign film,” Sarris nonetheless wrote, “Film for film, Hollywood can hold its own with the rest of the world. If there have been more individualized works from abroad, there have also been fewer competent ones.”

To be sure, Sarris’s list of “pantheon directors”—that is to say, the very best filmmakers to have produced movies in this country—included those born overseas, including Alfred Hitchcock (born in England), Fritz Lang (born in Vienna), and Ernst Lubitsch (born in Germany). Note, however, that all three men eventually pulled up stakes for Hollywood, where, most would agree, they produced their most richly conceived, fully realized, and widely remembered work. 

For example, Hitchcock’s British-made The 39 Steps and The Lady Vanishes are undeniable charmers, but it took the resources of Paramount Pictures to produce a masterpiece like Vertigo. In the words of Lubitsch, whose own stint in Tinseltown resulted in the classic romantic comedies Ninotchka, The Shop Around the Corner, and Cluny Brown, “There is Paramount Paris and Metro Paris, and of course the real Paris. Paramount’s is the most Parisian of all.”

My own preference for American-made movies owes something to the influence of Peter Bogdanovich, the great director of The Last Picture Show and Paper Moon who, operating as a sometime-film historian and enthusiast, followed closely in the footsteps of the pro-Hollywood Sarris. Because I knew and interviewed Peter for nearly twenty years, I was often on the receiving end of his expressions of distaste for what he considered the pernicious influence of European movies on the work of his contemporaries, including Francis Ford Coppola.

“The ones who were influenced most by the European cinema, which I think is a disastrous influence, those were the guys who somehow felt that success was equated with compromise and artistic failure,” Bogdanovich once told me. “Like Antonioni wasn’t commercial, so he was good. Well, to me Antonioni was a big bore.”

Bogdanovich’s mentor Orson Welles (a native of Kenosha, Wisconsin) once chided his mentee about his antipathy toward foreign movies. “Simply because it didn’t happen on the banks of the Mississippi, it’s obscure and arty,” Welles said, mercilessly needling Bogdanovich during one of their famous interviews. “You mustn’t be asked about anything that isn’t, you know, Judge Shit on the Range or something—.”

Welles may have won the argument through his incisive sense of humor, but, in the fullness of time, Bogdanovich won the war: Which would you rather watch—a lugubrious, pretentious transmission from the arthouses on the continent or a profoundly artful yet sublimely simple Western like John Ford’s Stagecoach, Howard Hawks’s Rio Bravo, or Clint Eastwood’s Pale Rider? I rest my case. To the extent that motion pictures are a popular art form, the American virtues of clarity, directness, and elegance will always (ahem) trump the continental tendency to obfuscate. In other words, not only do Hollywood workers need more (and better) movies made in Hollywood—so do we, the audience.

In fact, Trump’s pro-Hollywood argument is nothing more than a MAGA-tinged restatement of the following assertion by Martin Scorsese, speaking in the 1990 documentary Hollywood Mavericks: “The legacy of the American film is a constant well—a constant refreshing, something to look forward to. Even if it’s a re-viewing of an old favorite, somehow some of the things over the years grow richer.”

In this instance, Trump’s only crime is to wish to rekindle one of America’s proudest cultural legacies.

The post Hooray for Hollywood  appeared first on The American Conservative.