FBI Confirms Fertility Clinic Bombing in Palm Springs Was ‘Intentional Act of Terrorism’ (VIDEO)

The FBI held a press conference Saturday afternoon following a lethal explosion at a fertility clinic in Palm Springs, California.

Officials have already confirmed one fatality, an individual found near a destroyed vehicle.

An additional four people were injured in the blast.

#BREAKING: A BOMB has exploded outside a fertility clinic in Palm Springs, California, the mayor says

Multiple casualties have been reported, including the suspect.

FBI Los Angeles is taking over the investigation and has bomb technicians on scene, per Director Patel pic.twitter.com/Z7IB0EOId3

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 17, 2025

Palm Springs fertility clinic attacker is believed to have taken his own life in the bombing.

Others were injured by the explosion that went through the facility. Aerial footage shows the car blast and wreckage clearly.

This was an attack on a pro-life establishment. pic.twitter.com/e5DsLUi6DI

— Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) May 17, 2025

The suspect in the attack is 25-year-old Guy Edward Bartkus.

According to media reports, Bartkus identified as a pro-mortalist and believed that humans had never given consent to existing.

He reportedly left a 30-minute audio recording in which he explained his motives.

“I figured I would just make a recording explaining why I’ve decided to bomb an IVF building, or clinic,” he explained.

”Basically, it just comes down to I’m angry that I exist and that, you know, nobody got my consent to bring me here.”

FBI Assistant Director for Los Angeles Akil Davis confirmed it was an “intentional act of terrorism.”

He continued:

The FBI is investigating it as such, our joint terrorism task force is here working in lockstep with the Palm Springs Police Department, the ATF, and a whole host of agencies that I’ve already mentioned. 

This explosion was significant, covering several blocks.Rroads are closed as there are wide debris fields over 250 yards.

The FBI’s evidence response team is on scene right now processing evidence. And we’ll be here for a significant amount of time.

Our bomb technicians are working to determine the origin of the blast.

We are working to confirm the identity of the deceased, and we will provide that to you as soon as we can, but we are keeping that close hold to protect the integrity of the investigation.

BREAKING: The FBI has labeled the explosion in Palm Springs, California, as an “intentional act of terrorism” that has left one person d*ad and at least four people injured.

“Currently, one person who was near the vehicle is deceased, but at least four people are injured.”… pic.twitter.com/CpV7MtNowy

— RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) May 18, 2025

Unlike abortion clinics, fertility clinics are specialized medical center that helps people become pregnant, offering advanced treatments like IVF, hormone therapy, and reproductive technologies.

 

The post FBI Confirms Fertility Clinic Bombing in Palm Springs Was ‘Intentional Act of Terrorism’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Malia Obama Accused of Completely Ripping Off Indie Film for Her Nike Commercial Directorial Debut (VIDEO)

Malia Obama has been accused of completely ripping off an indie film for her Nike commercial directorial debut.

The commercial is nearly identical to the short film scene, shot-by-shot and angle-by-angle.

Natalie Jasmine Harris, 27, the director of the short film “Grace,” has indicated that she is considering legal action over the alleged plagiarism.

In Obama’s video, two young black girls play pat-a-cake and use the same color palette, camera shots, and framing as a scene in Grace.

I’m just going to leave this here.

This is my indie short film, “Grace,” next to Malia Obama’s @Nike x @_ajawilson22 commercial

It’s devastating, but at least you can (hopefully) see that this is about much more than just pat-a-cake…. pic.twitter.com/71m0H5n84z

— Natalie Jasmine Harris (@nataliejharris) May 12, 2025

The film was screened at the Sundance Film Festival, which Obama attended.

Making the matter even more shocking, Harris told Business Insider that the two actually met at the festival because their films were competing against each other.

“I’d met Malia at Sundance in 2024, when ‘Grace’ and her short film ‘The Heart’ were both in competition. We saw each other at the director’s brunch and a couple other events,” she said.

Harris also took to social media to vent her frustrations.

“I know art often overlaps, but moments like this hit hard when you’ve poured your heart into telling stories with care and barely get the recognition you deserve. If brands want a certain look, why not hire from the source instead of for name recognition?” Harris wrote in a post on X.

I know art often overlaps, but moments like this hit hard when you’ve poured your heart into telling stories with care and barely get the recognition you deserve. If brands want a certain look, why not hire from the source instead of for name recognition? @Nike @_ajawilson22 pic.twitter.com/Y57ACZiPRe

— Natalie Jasmine Harris (@nataliejharris) May 6, 2025

When someone commented that she should speak to an attorney, Harris responded, “We shall see…”

we shall see…

— Natalie Jasmine Harris (@nataliejharris) May 12, 2025

The post Malia Obama Accused of Completely Ripping Off Indie Film for Her Nike Commercial Directorial Debut (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A Night to Remember

A Night to Remember

If you’re going to eat McDonald’s, why not eat at McDonald’s?

(Daniel Harvey Gonzalez/In Pictures via Getty Images)

While I have not yet sauntered into my local Steak ’n Shake to judge the purported superiority of beef tallow-drenched French fries, I have not been idle in my ongoing, apparently lifelong, survey of America’s fast-food offerings.

One night last week, I crossed the threshold of an area McDonald’s—not to place an order to go, as I sometimes do in the faint hope that my order be better understood face-to-face than over the intercoms, which are unimproved since the days of Wayne’s World. No, I swung open the doors to the Golden Arches with the full intention of, for the first time in some years, ordering and consuming a meal on the premises. What a concept! 

Permit me to reminiscence for a moment. When I was growing up, McDonald’s was as much a destination as any of the other fast-food or fast-casual restaurants my family frequented, such as Shoney’s or Cracker Barrel. To be sure, we did avail ourselves of the McDonald’s drive-thru to take meals home, but when I requested to go to McDonald’s, I was requesting to go to McDonald’s—literally and seriously. I was not asking to be driven to McDonald’s, have an order placed on my behalf, and then have the order conveyed back to where we began (home). Such an expedition does not count as a trip, which carries the implication of a destination, so much as a ride, which is characterized by never getting out of the car. No, what I sought as a first- and second-grader was a full-fledged excursion to McDonald’s: an order placed at the counter, received on a plastic tray, and enjoyed while seated at plastic tables and chairs among other friendly families.

For far too many present-day McDonald’s patrons, however, not getting out of the car—never getting out of the car—seems to be precisely the point: The fast-food drive-thru lane has become not a matter of convenience—say, something to be used by car poolers in need of a caffeinated pick-me-up—but the de facto means by which most fast-food meals are acquired. 

This is regrettable. 

First, while I am well aware that the cuisine at McDonald’s is not fine dining on the order of my local French bistro (a high bar in a throbbing, worldly metropolis like Columbus, Ohio), their offerings are in no way enhanced by being packaged in sacks and driven home. To the contrary, my main motivation for eating at McDonald’s last week was to test the hypothesis that their food is superior when consumed in a non-lukewarm or wilted state. I can now affirm that my 9-year-old self was not wrong: The fries are far tastier when traveling the distance from deep-fryer to table rather than deep-fryer to car to front door to table—even without beef tallow. 

Yet, on the weeknight I chose to dine in at McDonald’s, I was one of exactly two people who was doing so—the other was my brother. Apart from us, the customers who streamed in were either picking up their own orders or picking up orders on behalf of others. Notwithstanding the late hour at which I chose to have my dinner, I could not help but wonder why so many people were willing to drive to a McDonald’s but not willing to eat at a McDonald’s. Yes, I realize it is called fast food, but the inconvenient truth is that no actual time is saved when taking food home rather than eating the food there: The driver still has to travel to and from the restaurant, and the food still has to be eaten. 

Alas, I fear that the reliance on the fast-food drive-thru to the exclusion of the fast-food dining room is another symptom of Americans’ tendency to cordon themselves off into silos. Even prior to the pandemic, we were becoming a population more committed to solitude than socialization. We buy things online, we prefer streaming movies to watching them in a multiplex, and we would rather scrutinize the images on a handheld phone than attend a concert, a play, or an art exhibition. 

By the same token, many Americans are evidently perfectly content with unappetizingly cooled-down or melted food so long as it is devoured in the privacy of their living quarters—or, in some cases, in the quiet desolation of their cars. I am forever astonished at the number of YouTube fast-food reviewers who conduct their taste tests in the confines of their automobiles. Between the sonically enclosed space, which magnifies the sound of every chew, and the inevitable accumulation of crumbs, there could be few places gloomier to have any sort of meal, let alone one to be commemorated in digital video eternity. This is a sign of a nation turning inward—a people willing to make the trek to acquire a sack of food only to retreat, like hoarders, back to their safe spaces to consume and report back on it. 

You can bet that when I finally do try those beef-tallow spuds, I hope to do so in the welcome company of other Make America Healthy Again adherents. What, after all, is healthier than sharing a meal with others?

The post A Night to Remember appeared first on The American Conservative.

Stand Up and Fight Back!

Stand Up and Fight Back!

Japanese parliamentarian Haraguchi Kazuhiro talks to The American Conservative about the need for a Japan First movement.


Credit: image via Shutterstock

Political alignments worldwide are in a state of flux. Japan is no exception. In recent years, Haraguchi Kazuhiro, a member of the left-leaning Constitutional Democratic Party (CDP) and ten-term parliamentarian in the Japanese Diet, has emerged as one of the most vocal Japan First voices in the archipelago.

Haraguchi’s opposition to Japan’s deep state, as well as to the coronavirus “vaccine,” has earned him the praise of populists around the world. He has not changed his principles in his nearly three-decade political career. What has changed is the way that political lines are drawn, as well as the political awareness of people in Japan and many other countries.

In this exclusive interview, we ask Haraguchi about his views on public health, the Trump administration, and the downsides of Japan’s alliance with Washington.

You first gained prominence abroad when a May 31, 2024, speech you gave at a Stop the WHO rally in Tokyo was picked up by news media worldwide. “I apologize to all of you,” you said, speaking of coronavirus vaccines. “So many have died, and they shouldn’t have.” Can you explain what led you to make this statement?

I announced on my Twitter (X) page in April of 2023 that I had been diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a malignant form of lymphoma. I have been told by medical experts who examined me that there is a very high probability that my cancer was caused by the coronavirus “vaccine,” specifically by spike proteins in the injected material. I had had three separate injections before developing symptoms. All were Pfizer vaccines, lot numbers FC9880, FD1945, and GD9568.

On June 12, 2023, almost a year before my May 2024 appearance at the anti-WHO rally, I stood up in the Diet and, in the middle of a live national television broadcast, stated that the government was manipulating data on excess vaccine deaths. I also said, without making the cause-and-effect connection explicit, that my physical condition deteriorated—meaning I got cancer—after I took the “vaccine.”

Many government officials in Japan know, and knew, that the “vaccine” was potentially harmful. They pushed it anyway.

Why would the Japanese government knowingly endanger the lives of the Japanese people?

To understand this, it is necessary to understand the nature of the Japanese government in the postwar period. The Japan-U.S. Alliance, the bedrock of Japan’s postwar security and political structure, is not an alliance at all, but a cover for Washington’s control of Japan.

Washington has the authority to put bases anywhere on Japanese soil it wishes. Large swaths of Japanese airspace over Okinawa, of course, but also over much of an area of Honshu stretching southwest and northeast from Haneda airport in Tokyo, is off-limits to Japanese commercial aircraft, because that airspace is reserved for the exclusive use of the American military. The Japan-U.S. Alliance is a “double-containment” arrangement, meant to restrain not just the former Soviet Union, and now Russia, North Korea, and the People’s Republic of China, but also Japan itself.

In this situation, we are at the mercy of Washington neocons and Wall Street corporations and banks. The Osprey, for example, is a dangerous aircraft that has caused at least 64 fatalities among American servicemen. Japan is forced to buy Ospreys at a cost of some 22 billion yen each (more than 150 million USD), with lifetime maintenance costs of more than double that over 20 years. Aegis missile systems cost much more, because Japan must build special vessels as platforms for such systems. (Aegis systems always at the ready on the Japanese archipelago, so-called “Aegis Ashore” systems, were deemed too unsafe and too costly to build on land.) The cost of building just two of those vessels, with work to be completed in 2027 for one and 2028 for the other, is projected to total 790 billion yen, or nearly $5.5 billion. Japan bought four hundred Tomahawk missiles in January of 2024 at a total cost of 254 billion yen (some 1.7 billion USD), but half of the missiles were older models, and none of them, at a cruising speed of just 80 percent the speed of sound, comes close to Russia’s hypersonic missiles at Mach 27.

Foreign military sales (meaning “purchases” in Japan’s case, as we buy from the U.S.) have been increasing rapidly, from around $1.3 billion in 2014 to more than $10 billion in 2023. The 1985 Plaza Accords were designed to hamstring Japan’s economy by making the yen expensive, thus driving up the cost of Japanese products abroad. Blackrock and other Wall St. firms siphon off Japanese taxpayer monies because Japanese politicians, such as former prime minister Koizumi Junichiro, privatize sectors of the Japanese political economy (in his case, the post office savings network) so that foreign “investors” can get access to Japanese citizens’ hard-earned money.

This helps explain why the political class in Japan does nothing to protect Japanese people, but instead does the bidding of those with money, particularly foreigners, and above all, Washington and its minions. Consider that the Japanese government extended to overseas pharmaceutical companies the extraordinary privilege of exempting them from all claims from damages for the coronavirus “vaccine.” Also, I worked to have the Japanese government issue a special approval for the use of ivermectin for the coronavirus. But some said that anyone suggesting that ivermectin be used to treat coronavirus infection was a “conspiracy theorist.” I suspect that those in the WHO who were critical of ivermectin may have been paid off. 

I asked someone in the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare in Japan why the approval of ivermectin was being held up, and was told that “someone is blocking it.” There is an organization under the authority of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare called the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, which is responsible for ensuring the safety of drugs and medical equipment. But some eighty percent of the budget for this agency comes from pharmaceutical companies. The name of the agency in Japanese is prefaced with “Dokuritsu gyosei hojin,” which means “independent administrative institution,” but, clearly, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency has no independence whatsoever.

What can Japan do to regain its independence and protect its people?

I admire President Donald Trump for all he has done to protect Americans and to make America great again. I also admire Food and Drug Administration director Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for his devotion to health and environmental well-being.

We need a Trump and an RFK Jr. in Japan. We need people who are willing to stand up for workers, for common men and women, for common sense. We don’t need any more propaganda from the government or the media. We need people who will tell the truth and do what is right for average citizens, not for big corporations.

Some inspiration for Japanese independence comes from Okinawa, which remained under American occupation until 1972, 20 years after the rest of Japan was nominally restored to Japanese sovereignty. But Okinawa continues to bear the heaviest burden in Japan in terms of hosting American military bases. The people of Okinawa, the people of Japan, are not anti-American. We love the USA. We love freedom and justice and truth, just as much as Americans do. We want to defend ourselves, to take responsibility for our own country. We can’t do this when Washington’s interests always come first.

This is why the Senkaku Islands are not properly defended from near-daily Chinese incursions—not because Japanese people lack the will to fight, but because Washington doesn’t want to risk a nuclear war with China over islands it considers of little to no importance. But the Senkakus are our land. We want to fight for them. We want to fight to protect what we love.

A five-member, non-partisan coalition of parliamentarians, with myself as the representative member, has made three aerial excursions to the Senkakus, which are part of Ishigaki City in Okinawa Prefecture. My own party tried to stop me from going. But my position is, why should I not be able to visit the territory in my own country? Our coalition of five parliamentarians believes firmly in the name we chose for ourselves: “Alliance of Parliamentarians Taking Action to Protect National Sovereignty and the National Interest.”

We need more people like this. We need people to stand up to politicians in Tokyo, in Washington, in Beijing, anywhere the well-being of the Japanese people is under attack. And not just the Japanese people. We want an anti-global network worldwide. I admire BRICS and hope that more and more people around the world will be brave, stand up, and fight against the dehumanization of human beings.

The post Stand Up and Fight Back! appeared first on The American Conservative.

Buckley the Maestro

Buckley the Maestro

A new book examines the late conservative grandee’s long love affair with classical music.

American Impresario: William F. Buckley, Jr. and the Elements of American Character
By Lawrence Perelman, Bombardier Books,
pp. 240, $18.99

At William F. Buckley, Jr.’s fortnightly musical salons, his socialite wife, Pat, liked to quip, “Bill married me for the piano.” The regal Austrian Bösendorfer, which was built in 1927, held pride of place in their Manhattan maisonette, where artists such as the Bach virtuoso Rosalyn Tureck performed for him and his guests. Until the very end of his life, when he died at age 82 in 2008, it remained a cherished source of music for Buckley.

Buckley’s passion for classical music had its sources in his childhood in Great Elm, a sprawling estate in Sharon, Connecticut that had been built by his rumbustious father, William Sr. This patriarch insisted that his progeny (10 in all) take weekly lessons on one of the estate’s pianos (five in all). Nor did their tuition end here. A compulsory listening session four times a week on a Capehart phonograph, supervised by one of the children’s tutors, Miss Penelope Oyen, was the essential bridge to the great composers of the past—not least Johann Sebastian Bach, whose third movement of the Brandenburg Concerto No. 2 would serve as the jaunty introduction to Buckley’s television show, Firing Line. In 1989, Buckley himself performed a Bach harpsichord concerto with the Phoenix Symphony, an experience that was close to a religious one for that devout Catholic.

In American Impresario, Lawrence Perelman contends that classical music wasn’t incidental to Buckley’s life and work. It was central to it. Buckley was wont to say that politics was his vocation, not his avocation. The latter designation probably best describes Buckley’s absorption with what he (with more than a little justice) liked to call “good music.” 

Perelman, too, is an impassioned champion of it. A gifted pianist who emigrated in 1975 to Minnesota from the Soviet Union with his parents, he first met and performed for Buckley as a college student in Manhattan. Perelman explains how he and the progenitor of National Review ended up bonding over their shared love for Bach, Beethoven, and other musical titans. The result is an eloquent, absorbing, and heartfelt book.

Perelman observes that Buckley was a heroic figure in his Minneapolis home for his fervent anti-communist views. Indeed, Perelman was the only child in his third-grade class who had the temerity to raise his hand in favor of Ronald Reagan when he ran for reelection in 1984 against Walter Mondale, Minnesota’s native son. In 1994, after he entered the Manhattan School of Music, Perelman dispatched a letter to National Review’s office proposing that he perform on the piano for Buckley. Buckley agreed. Perelman was elated: “I felt like Charlie Bucket to Buckley’s Willy Wonka.” Upon entering Buckley’s upper East Side mansion, which Perelman describes as resembling something out of Downton Abbey, he performed Bach and Debussy before ending with Listz’s Transcendental Etude.

As Perelman’s studies progressed, he, like not a few aspiring professional musicians, came to realize that he simply didn’t have the goods to succeed as a concert pianist. Like Buckley, who had once harbored the dream of becoming a professional pianist, he would have to embark upon a different course. Here Buckley played a vital role in assisting Perelman. In 1998, Perelman sent Buckley a letter stating that he  now hoped to focus on bolstering the popularity of classical music for a wider commercial audience, an ambitious goal that he has made his life’s mission. 

Buckley arranged for his young admirer to meet with Schuyler Chapin, the commission of Cultural Affairs for New York, as well as to receive a $25,000 grant to study the state of music education in the city’s public schools. What amounted to an eleemosynary act played a pivotal part in advancing Perelman’s prospects. According to Perelman, “I was among many who had experienced Bill’s largesse and mentorship. It came naturally to him, the role of mentor and impresario. He was always looking for the opportunity to create opportunities for others. This was an incredible virtue that endeared him to so many.”

Perelman went on to become the head of a firm specializing in business strategy and public relations and serves as an adviser to the National Symphony Orchestra’s Gianandrea Noseda, among others. But all along he continued to fortify his friendship with Buckley, arranging for the pianist Simone Dinnerstein to give a private performance of Bach’s Goldberg Variations for Buckley towards the end of his life. Perelman himself played the Diabelli Variations for Buckley and was at his home in Connecticut when he died in 2008 at the age of 82. 

Perelman ascribes Buckley’s facility as a writer to an early immersion in classical music. “My theory,” he writes, “is that the countless hours spent practicing piano as a child along with listening to classical music with his siblings four times a week played a major role in giving Bill an incredible amount of discipline along with enhancing his ability to speak and write melodiously, as a musician plays, sings, or composes a score.” But it’s also hard not to wonder whether classical music wasn’t also a source of repose for Buckley, whose otherwise frenetic schedule testifies to a perpetually restless nature.

Perelman himself notes that Bach was Buckley’s favorite composer. He goes on to state, “When looking back at the Buckley era from the 1950s to early 2000s, we can see that faith and music were central.” Bach’s music was steeped in religious devotion, ascending to an exalted level that has served as a source of inspiration for everyone from Felix Mendelssohn, who conducted the St. Matthew Passion in 1829 and again 1841, to Dmitri Shostakovich, who drew on the Well-Tempered Clavier for his own monumental 24 Preludes and Fugues.  As Buckley astutely noted in a column celebrating Bach’s 300th birthday in 1985, “The music of Bach disturbs human complacency because one can’t readily understand finiteness in its presence.” Perelman concludes on a pensive note. He states that “Since Bill’s passing, we have continued to see the decline of the importance of transcendent values. A return to these values—whether religious or spiritual in nature—will benefit our nation in myriad ways.” Whether his counsel, at a moment of national turbulence, will be heeded is an open question. But in recounting his unlikely friendship with Buckley, Perelman has written a kind of Bildungsroman, one that highlights the ability of the sound of music to serve as the tie that binds and handsomely rewards his former mentor’s faith in him. That is firm enough ground to stand upon.

The post Buckley the Maestro appeared first on The American Conservative.

John Nolte of Breitbart News Breaks Down the Media’s Real Motives in Covering Joe Biden’s Mental Decline (VIDEO)

John Nolte of Breitbart News recently made a video with Alex Marlow, also of Breitbart, where they discussed the Jake Tapper book about Biden’s mental decline and the media coverage of the story.

For anyone who is not familiar, Nolte is a Senior Writer for Breitbart and a masterful analyst of politics and media. Very few people can see through the media’s motives and narratives with such clarity. Nolte is also known for his outstanding movie reviews and extensive knowledge of the arts and pop culture.

In the video below, Nolte tells Marlow why Jake Tapper and the media have flipped on Biden and why they are doing all of this now. He suggests that they are trying to absolve themselves and the Democrat party, but notes the fact that they are not apologizing for what they did and therefore do not deserve absolution of any kind.

Nolte goes so far as to suggest that this wasn’t even really a cover-up, considering that everyone knew Biden’s mind was gone.

From Breitbart News:

Nolte said Jake Tapper is “the arsonist calling the fire department. So, he’s hired the same crisis firm Anthony Weiner hired, the same crisis firm Elizabeth Holmes hired. … There was no cover-up. The entire word cover-up is total B.S. … We all knew, it was just a gaslighting campaign to try and tell us that what we were seeing isn’t what we were seeing and he was fine and it was all partisan, because at the time, they felt he was the only person who could defeat Donald Trump.”

Nolte says there are two things that are going to haunt the left for at least a decade. One being the illegal immigration crisis under Biden and the other being this gaslighting campaign over Biden’s mental state.

The video below is cued to start at the 24:40 mark, so just press play:

This is the kind of analysis you won’t see on CNN or MSNBC. Truthful, solid, and right to the point.

The post John Nolte of Breitbart News Breaks Down the Media’s Real Motives in Covering Joe Biden’s Mental Decline (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

CNN’s Scott Jennings Red-Pills Bill Maher’s Liberal Audience While Talking About Trump’s Foreign Policy (VIDEO)

Scott Jennings, the lone conservative voice on CNN, made his debut on the Bill Maher show this weekend and made quite an impression on Maher’s liberal audience.

Jennings even managed to get a round of applause while talking about Trump’s foreign policy.

He noted that Trump puts the possibility of peace ahead of war and suggested that this is a big part of Trump’s appeal. He framed the issue perfectly, as he often does, and earned an applause break.

Partial transcript via Eric Abbenante on Twitter/X:

Bill Maher: “There is a Trump doctrine now. Now we have the Trump doctrine, I think as much of a departure as any president has promulgated.

Trump in Riyadh: “In the end the so called nation builders wrecked more nations than they built. Interventionists were intervening complex societies that they did not understand.”

Bill Maher: “His doctrine is ‘You do you, we all love money’”

Scott Jennings: “Something about the Republican doctrine that has been fascinating to me. We’ve always been war and peace, Trump has changed it to peace and war. He talks about peace more than he talks about war. They would much rather hear an American president talk about peace. ‘Peace through strength’ on that I think he’s right. Putting peace ahead of war pretty popular among the American people.”

Watch the video:

Scott Jennings receives an applause break from the Bill Maher audience for articulating the ‘Peace and War’ aspect of the ‘Trump doctrine’:
Bill Maher: “There is a Trump doctrine now. Now we have the Trump doctrine, I think as much of a departure as any president has… pic.twitter.com/7xmTCr7QxA

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) May 17, 2025

In this clip, Jennings talks about how he does his job at CNN in New York while living in Kentucky.

Scott Jennings grins like a Cheshire cat as Bill Maher accuses him of running for Senate in Kentucky:
Scott Jennings: “Washington: There’s a concentration of people there who only talk to each other. They live in this little bubble. The longer you you’re in it, the less you have… pic.twitter.com/zJt2kot4il

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) May 17, 2025

There are rumors that Jennings may run for Senate in Kentucky when Mitch McConnell retires, that’s what that last comment from Bill was about.

The post CNN’s Scott Jennings Red-Pills Bill Maher’s Liberal Audience While Talking About Trump’s Foreign Policy (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump’s Approval Numbers Surging in Blue New Jersey – More Popular Than State’s Democrat Governor

President Trump’s approval numbers are rising in blue New Jersey. At the moment, he is more popular with Garden Staters than their Democrat Governor Phil Murphy.

During the 2024 election, there was plenty of speculation about the possibility of New Jersey flipping red for the first time in years. It ultimately didn’t happen, but Trump still did better in the state than many Democrats expected.

Trump did so well in New Jersey that Republican activist Scott Presler, who is often credited with helping Pennsylvania flip red, has now launched a new campaign to do the same thing in New Jersey in 2028.

Based on this, it seems feasible.

Townhall reports:

Trump Surges in Deep-Blue New Jersey as Voters Turn on Democrat Governor

In a striking shift for a deep-blue state, New Jersey voters now view President Donald Trump more favorably than their own Democratic Governor, Phil Murphy. Despite years of anti-Trump rhetoric from state leaders and media outlets, the numbers suggest growing frustration among residents, particularly as high taxes, rising inflation, and cost-of-living pressures take a toll on working Americans.

A recent Emerson College/Pix 11/The Hill poll shows that Trump is breaking even with New Jersey voters—47 percent approve of his performance. In comparison, another 47 percent disapprove, and six percent remain undecided or neutral. In contrast, Murphy is underwater in his own state. Just 40 percent of voters give him a favorable rating, compared to 45 percent who disapprove, leaving him with a net negative of five points. Another 15 percent of those surveyed didn’t express a clear opinion.

The poll is striking since a Democrat has won every election in the state since 1992. While former President Joe Biden carried the Garden State by 16 points in 2020, former Vice President Kamala Harris carried the state by only six points. This was the Democratic Party’s worst performance in decades.

This is great news.

New Jersey Voters Approve of Trump More Than Their Democrat Governor

There is a shift happening in NJ

Let’s Flip This State https://t.co/P4DtnYJVfU pic.twitter.com/7RDvIxo9Yn

— Wake Up NJ New Jersey (@wakeupnj) May 17, 2025

Make New Jersey red again!

The post Trump’s Approval Numbers Surging in Blue New Jersey – More Popular Than State’s Democrat Governor appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Federal Appeals Court Bats Down Clinton Judge, Lifts Block on Trump’s Executive Order to Strip Federal Workers’ Union Rights

Last month a federal judge blocked President Trump’s executive order to strip federal workers of their ‘collective bargaining’ rights.

President Trump previously issued an executive order blocking hundreds of thousands of federal workers in HHS, Veterans, Treasury and other federal agencies.

The National Treasury Employees Union sued the Trump Administration in response to the executive order.

US District Judge Paul Friedman, a Clinton appointee, blasted Trump earlier this week during a hearing on this case.

“So, he’s willing to be kind to those that work with him, but those that have sued him, those that have filed grievances, those that have complained against him, he’s not going to bargain with,” Judge Friedman said, according to Politico. “I mean how else can you read what he’s done?”

Friedman previously called Trump’s executive order “unlawful” and enjoined all defendants except President Trump.

On Friday evening, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the Clinton judge’s ruling and lifted the block on Trump’s executive order.

The three-judge panel: Majority: Henderson (George H.W. Bush), Walker (Trump). Dissent: Childs (Biden).

“Preserving the President’s autonomy under a statute that expressly recognizes his national-security expertise is within the public interest,” Judges Henderson and Walker wrote, according to Politico.

Politico reported:

A federal appeals court has lifted a lower-court order that prevented the federal government from implementing President Donald Trump’s plan to end collective bargaining by workers at more than a dozen federal agencies.

In a 2-1 ruling Friday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said U.S. District Court Judge Paul Friedman appeared to have erred last month when he froze Trump’s executive order on the subject.

The appeals court’s majority said there was insufficient evidence that the National Treasury Employees Union faced “irreparable harm” that would justify the preliminary injunction, Friedman said in his ruling.

Judges Karen Henderson, a George H. W. Bush appointee, and Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, said the national security exception the president invoked in federal labor relations law is an added reason for courts to tread lightly.

The post Federal Appeals Court Bats Down Clinton Judge, Lifts Block on Trump’s Executive Order to Strip Federal Workers’ Union Rights appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

‘The Last of Us’ Star Pedro Pascal Lashes Out at Trump Supporters — ‘F**k The People Who Try to Make you Scared’

Pedro Pascal / Screenshot

The Last of Us star Pedro Pascal has launched a full-throttled attack against President Trump and his supporters.

Addressing a press conference at the Cannes Film Festival on Friday, Pascal went on a rant against the current U.S. administration.

“Fuck the people that try to make you scared,” Pascal said. “And fight back. And don’t let them win.”

Pascal, who has previously described himself as a “socialist refugee” whose family fled Chile under the rule of ugusto Pinochet, went on to share his sob story about how he fears for the welfare of immigrants.

“Obviously, it’s very scary for an actor participating in a movie to sort of speak to issues like this,” Pascal about Trump’s efforts to stop illegal immigration.

“I want people to be safe and to be protected, and I want very much to live on the right [side] of history.”

“I’m an immigrant. We fled a dictatorship, and I was privileged enough to grow up in the US, after asylum in Denmark.

“If it weren’t for that, I don’t know what would have happened to us,” he continued. “So I stand by those needing protection, always.”

Pedro Pascal at #Cannes: “I want people to be safe and protected. I want to live on the right side of history. I am an immigrant. My parents are refugees from Chile. We fled a dictatorship and I was privileged enough to grow up in the United States after asylum in Denmark. I… pic.twitter.com/n9rpIVurSZ

— Variety (@Variety) May 17, 2025

The 50-year-old actor, who is best known for playing tough guy roles in shows such as Narcos, Game of Thrones and The Mandalorian, has previously compared the policies of the Trump administration to Nazi Germany.

These comparisons have been brought into focus by former Mandalorian actress Gina Carano, who last year teamed up with Elon Musk to sue Disney for discrimination and wrongful termination.

A key argument of her lawsuit is the double standard applied to Carano, who was fired after comparing the COVID vaccine tyranny to the treatment of Jews in the 1930’s.

Pascal, who has since deleted these posts, was nevereven  reprimanded for his comments.

Canceled Hollywood Star Gina Carano Teams Up with Elon Musk to Sue Lucasfilm and Disney for Discrimination and Wrongful Termination

The post ‘The Last of Us’ Star Pedro Pascal Lashes Out at Trump Supporters — ‘F**k The People Who Try to Make you Scared’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.