Secret Service Launches Investigation After SS Agent Tries to Smuggle Wife on Plane Accompanying Trump’s Visit to Scotland

The Secret Service launched an investigation after an SS agent tried to smuggle his wife on a plane accompanying President Trump’s visit to Scotland.

President Trump landed in Turnberry, Scotland on Friday as part of a 5-day visit to the UK.

According to RealClearPolitics, a Secret Service Agent, who happens to be a new trainee, tried to bring his wife, an Air Force employee, with him on the trip to Scotland.

The agent reportedly flew his wife to Maryland where she received an officials Secret Service briefing and took a bus to Joint Base Andrews before she was told to leave, according to RCP.

“The agent in question is a Phase 1 agent (new trainee in first years on the job) who was written up multiple times for misconduct at the Rowley Training Center where agents go through their preliminary training to become agents and can wash out if held to proper standards, according to two sources in the Secret Service community,” RealClearPolitics reporter Susan Crabtree said.

Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi released a statement to RCPolitics:

“The U.S. Secret Service is conducting a personnel investigation after an employee attempted to invite his spouse – a member of the United States Air Force – aboard a mission support flight. The aircraft, operated by the U.S. Air Force, was being used by the Secret Service to transport personnel and equipment. Prior to the overseas departure, the employee was advised by supervisors that such action was prohibited, and the spouse was subsequently prevented from taking the flight. No Secret Service protectees were aboard and there was no impact to our overseas protective operations.”

The post Secret Service Launches Investigation After SS Agent Tries to Smuggle Wife on Plane Accompanying Trump’s Visit to Scotland appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Obama-Award Winning Criminal Illegal Alien Detained by ICE Following ‘Routine Court Appearance’

One of Barack Obama’s prized illegal aliens will likely be sent back to his place of birth after getting caught breaking the law again.

As Newsweek reported on Monday, 27-year-old Darwin Contreras, a man residing in Pennsylvania, was arrested on June 24 following a so-called routine court appearance. Contreras had been attending a proceeding related to the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD) program.

Contrera’s wife, Elizabeth DeJesus, claimed to Newsweek that the ICE agents were wearing “something you can get from Walmart” and refused to tell her where they were taking her husband.

She later learned he had been transported to Pike County Correctional Facility in Lords Valley.

Contreras was reportedly in the process of applying for his citizenship when he was detained.

Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), explained to Newsweek that the reason ICE agents detained Contreras was because he was caught driving under the influence (DUI).

She also revealed he has multiple other convictions that should have resulted in his deportation long ago.

“His criminal history includes convictions for theft and possession of marijuana. This criminal illegal alien admitted to law enforcement that he is in the country illegally,” McLaughlin explained to the outlet.

DeJesus, though, sought to garner sympathy by asserting that Contreras is now fading both mentally and physically.

“At first, when he got there, he was not adjusting well, he was not OK, his mental health was not good,” she said.

Contreras arrived in America illegally 20 years ago when he was 7. He grew up in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, where he attended school.

He thrived academically and athletically as a track and field athlete. In middle school, he earned a Presidential Fitness Award from Obama in 2012, which Newsweek obtained a copy of.

Contreras skipped college and began working full-time after graduating from high school. He became a father and later met DeJesus, whom he married in March.

The post Obama-Award Winning Criminal Illegal Alien Detained by ICE Following ‘Routine Court Appearance’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Tea Spill: How a Women’s Dating Defense App Brewed Up a Massive Privacy Nightmare

 

Logo of Tea Dating Advice. Credit: Screenshot from Google Play

In a contentious move to empower women in the dating world, the Tea app surged to the top of Apple’s U.S. App Store charts last week, allowing anonymous sharing of warnings about men’s “red flags”.

The celebration was short-lived as hackers struck, leaking thousands of private images online and sparking outrage over digital safety.

Tea Dating Advice Inc., based in San Francisco, swiftly confirmed the breach and enlisted cybersecurity pros to lock down their systems.

They assured users that no emails or phone numbers were compromised, urging calm without password changes. Yet, critics argue this response highlights broader failures in safeguarding vulnerable data.

The hack stemmed from an exposed legacy database, easily accessed by 4chan users who then dumped the material publicly.

Reports indicate the flaw affected archived data from before February 2024, exposing a glaring security lapse. This wasn’t sophisticated cyber warfare but a preventable oversight that betrayed user trust.

Founded in 2022 by software engineer Sean Cook after his mother’s harrowing dating experiences, Tea aimed to vet men for criminal records, catfishing, or hidden relationships.

Women hailed it as a “Yelp for dates,” with one reviewer dodging a man accused of assault thanks to shared alerts. Downloads skyrocketed 525% in mid-July, hitting 4 million users amid viral social buzz.

However, detractors slam Tea as a “man-shaming” vigilante platform that invades privacy and deters honest dating.

Legal experts note apps are shielded from liability for user posts under 1996 laws, but individuals risk defamation suits, but the anonymity of Tea users makes this difficult.

A recent Illinois ruling dismissed a similar privacy case against a Facebook group, leaving men with limited recourse.

The breach laid bare 72,000 images: 13,000 verification selfies and IDs, plus 59,000 from posts, comments, and messages.

Online forums buzzed with irony, as women decried the app’s failure to protect those it promised to shield. Some users mapped leaked IDs, amplifying fears of doxxing in an already risky digital landscape.

Cleveland Attorney Aaron Minc, specializing in online harassment, reported a flood of complaints from shamed men, warning such sites attract enemies.

“Over the last couple of weeks, we’ve gotten hundreds of calls on it. It’s blown up,” attorney Minc noted. “People are upset. They’re getting named. They’re getting shamed.’’

Cybersecurity voices called it a wake-up for apps handling sensitive info, urging stronger encryption.

In an already frustrated dating landscape, the Tea app only serves to drive a deeper wedge between the genders. By empowering anonymous users to publicly shame those they’ve deemed bad dates, it risks spelling doom for the broader dating scene.

The post Tea Spill: How a Women’s Dating Defense App Brewed Up a Massive Privacy Nightmare appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Now This is Comedy: Fewer Than Two Dozen People Show Up to Protest Outside CBS in Support of Stephen Colbert

Late- night talk show host Stephen Colbert did not have much good to say about Tuesday's election results.

Late- night talk show host Stephen Colbert did not have much good to say about Tuesday's election results.
Late- night talk show host Stephen Colbert did not have much good to say about Tuesday’s election results. (The Late Show with Stephen Colbert / YouTube screen shot)

A New York City protest in support of Stephen Colbert fizzled out in just minutes after only about 20 people showed up.

The “We’re With Colbert” protest, organized in response to the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, was supposed to take place at the CBS Broadcast Center on Manhattan’s West Side.

“Our country is not perfect, never has been,” said the event’s organizer, who would only identify himself as Matt, according to a report from the New York Post. “But we’ve always had the First Amendment, and now Mango Mussolini is trying to take that from us.”

With “Mango Mussolini,” he was referring to President Donald Trump, of course.

This was not the first demonstration in Colbert’s defense. Just days earlier, a “Save Colbert” rally was organized by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. Just like Sunday’s event, the protest drew just a couple of dozen participants.

The rallies were mocked heavily on social media.

CBS announced earlier this month that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert would conclude its run in May, marking the end of a nearly decade-long tenure for the host.

Network executives attributed the decision to financial pressures, including declining advertising revenue and shifting viewer habits in the late-night landscape.

Critics, including Colbert himself, have suggested the move was politically motivated to appease President Trump.

Colbert and the others have pointed to the timing, which followed Paramount’s $16 million settlement of a lawsuit filed by Trump against CBS News, alleging that misleading edits were made to a 2024 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign.

Colbert had decried the settlement as a “big, fat bribe” on his show.

The post Now This is Comedy: Fewer Than Two Dozen People Show Up to Protest Outside CBS in Support of Stephen Colbert appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Police Identify Four Suspects in Cincinnati Beatings as Democrat Mayor Finally Responds to Brutal Attacks

Cincinnati police have identified at least four suspects in the brutal beatings of a white man and white woman by a mostly Black mob Friday night in the downtown area of the city, according to the local Fraternal Order of Police and Fox News.

Videos and screen images of the attack went viral over the weekend, drawing comments from Ohio native Vice President J.D. Vance, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights division Harmeet Dhillon who said she is monitoring the case and Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH).

(TGP report on Vance’s comments at this link.)

Cincinnati Mayor Aftab Pureval, official photo.

Cincinnati’s Democrat Mayor Aftab Pureval, who is facing Vance’s half-brother Cory Bowman in his bid for reelection in November’s election, finally commented Monday afternoon on the attacks after three days of silence. Bowman posted videos of the attack on Saturday that went viral criticizing Pureval for the lack of police presence downtown Friday.

X versions posted by Bowman (embedding blocked by X):

https://x.com/corymbowman/status/1949132297040797940

https://x.com/corymbowman/status/1949272141188207008

Post Millennial copy of the video:

Viral screen images showed a man on the ground being attacked by a mob and an unconscious woman with blood streaming from her mouth:

Statement by Mayor Pureval:

I am outraged by the vicious fight that occurred downtown. It is horrifying to watch, and this unacceptable and disgusting behavior is intolerable in any part of our community. That’s not who we are as a city.

Since the fight occurred, I have been in consistent communication with Chief Theetge, and our police have been working around the clock to investigate and bring perpetrators of violence to justice. Based on the investigation and the urgent work of our police, I am confident that arrests are forthcoming. For that reason, we are making every effort to allow our officers to do their job and present formal results to the public, rather than engaging with early speculation.

Let me be clear: Cincinnati is an inclusive city where all can come together to enjoy major events in our urban core. Based on our information, this incident was not connected to Cincinnati Music Fest, the local Reds games, the Big3 tournament, or any of the large events that took place over the weekend.

I want to thank our law enforcement for their thorough work, both to investigate this incident and to keep folks safe throughout our city this weekend.”

Excerpt from report by Fox News reporter Alexis McAdams:

Authorities have identified at least four suspects in a violent brawl that took place in downtown Cincinnati, police sources tell Fox News.

FOX 19 reported that the fight took place on Friday night between Elm and Fourth Streets, with videos of the brawl going viral on social media.

…Police sources told Fox News on Monday that at least four suspects have been identified. Police are still trying to identify at least eight more people, the sources said.

It’s unclear what led to the fight.

The two individuals were seriously injured in the fight, the police sources said.

Ken Kober, president of the Cincinnati Fraternal Order of Police, spoke to WLWT-TV about the attacks:

The post Police Identify Four Suspects in Cincinnati Beatings as Democrat Mayor Finally Responds to Brutal Attacks appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

ABLECHILD: Another Presidential Order to “Rebrand” Psychiatry

Another Presidential Order to “Rebrand” Psychiatry

Reprinted with permission from AbleChild. 

President Trump’s new executive order Ending Crime and  Disorder on America’s Streets, says putting people into long-term institutions is the “most proven way” to fix public safety and homelessness. But this is just a return to old ideas that have already been shown to fail.

The order instructs the Attorney General to undo current court rules that protect people from being forced into mental health care by ending “consent decrees that limit State and local government’s ability to commit individuals on the streets who are risk to themselves or others.” These current court protections were set up with the help of psychiatry when the industry was caught red-handed in human rights abuses decades ago. Most people don’t remember that psychiatry’s stranglehold began with President Lyndon B. Johnson’s executive order, which tied the government closely to psychiatry. Now, behavioral health groups have powerful influence in state and federal governments, shaping laws and policies.

Both older institutions and community mental health programs have spent enormous amounts of money — at least three states—New York, California, and Connecticut—have official audits, reports, or legislative scrutiny reflecting failures in the behavioral health system for homeless populations along with rising costs of contracts or services. This excludes counting billions more spent on mental health care throughout the United States. The problem with all this spending is that homelessness has only gotten worse and people diagnosed with mental health problems aren’t getting better. But the problem isn’t money. The problem is the way the psychiatric community and the government work together that isn’t necessarily in the nation’s best interest.

President Trump’s executive order focuses on pushing more funding toward drug addiction intervention and weakening civil commitment policies (forcing people into mental health institutions). But these recommendations just reshuffle power among the same groups that continually fail to make a difference or show positive results. Nothing new here. This isn’t just about Trump; many presidents have been influenced by a very powerful psychiatric industry that, in many ways, controls quality of life cradle to grave.

This powerful behavioral health industry, supported by the government, is known not only for hiding data on mental health issues—such as links between psychiatric drugs and violence or suicide—and the role the industry played in the attempted assassination of President Trump.  For example, the alleged assassin’s parents were behavioral health experts.

Providing the psychiatric industry to have more control over American lives is a bad idea, especially in light of the fact that countless people have been seriously harmed by psychiatry’s “chemical imbalance” theory that finally was debunked in 2022. More importantly, the psychiatric industry has continually escaped any accountability for these obvious failures and, still the government continues to fund what can only be described as a fraudulent industry. There is no abnormality that is any psychiatric diagnosis, and the drugs prescribed for “treatment” do not treat any known abnormality and the pharmaceutical companies openly admit they have no idea how the drugs “work” as “treatment” for any psychiatric disorder. Obviously, this raises serious concerns about how President Trump’s executive order is a “solution” to the mental health crisis that the nation is facing. Given the history of forced mental health incarceration, one could argue there will be an unfortunate outcome for human rights and personal freedom.

Both the old institutional model and newer community programs haven’t worked—even with billions of dollars spent. The Landmark case of Willowbrook Institution was a big win for “informed consent,” yet the federal government refuses to honor it. Willowbrook was an example of neglect and abuse, igniting lawsuits and cries to shutter such places. Community programs were supposed to be better, offering medication and housing outside of those hellish hospitals. But hundreds of billions of dollars later, the same problems persist. Too much funding is funneled into forced medication programs and crisis interventions instead of teaching life skills.

The data is clear. The current mental health model isn’t working and resorting back to the old ways won’t be any better. The fact is nobody is getting better. Rather, with each new diagnosis more mind-altering drugs are prescribed. Is it any wonder that the President feels forced to handle the mess that that psychiatric community has created?

Instead of ending homelessness, which is the President’s desire, the recommended fix will just return people to institutions that didn’t work in the past and seriously infringe on personal freedom and human rights. And, worse, these institutions will be run by the very industry that created the problem.  It’s time to address the crisis created by the psychiatric community. The federal government has become a partner in this crisis by continuing to fund the behavioral health industry. A good starting point is to acknowledge that no one is getting better…they’re just getting more drugged.

AbleChild is a 501(3) C nonprofit organization that has recently co-written landmark legislation in Tennessee, setting a national precedent for transparency and accountability in the intersection of mental health, pharmaceutical practices, and public safety.

What you can do.  Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!

Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive.  As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.

The post ABLECHILD: Another Presidential Order to “Rebrand” Psychiatry first appeared on Joe Hoft.

The post ABLECHILD: Another Presidential Order to “Rebrand” Psychiatry appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NEW: Obama Judge Issues NATIONWIDE Block on Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Provision Barring Funding for Planned Parenthood

A federal judge on Monday expanded a preliminary injunction and blocked Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Provision barring funding for Planned Parenthood nationwide.

Earlier this month Judge Talwani, an Obama appointee, issued a TRO and temporarily blocked the reconciliation bill’s provision barring funding for Planned Parenthood.

Last Monday, the judge granted a preliminary injunction in part extending a block on barring funding for Planned Parenthood.

Today, Judge Talwani expanded her injunction nationwide.

The judge’s ruling comes after the US Supreme Court largely restricted lower courts from issuing nationwide injunctions.

CNN reported:

A federal judge in Boston has widened her block on the Trump administration’s ability to enforce a provision of President Donald Trump’s sweeping domestic policy law that would defund Planned Parenthood’s health care services.

US District Judge Indira Talwani ruled last week that the administration couldn’t enforce the funding ban against some Planned Parenthood organizations. In a new preliminary injunction issued Monday, the judge blocked enforcement of the law nationwide, saying it applied to the dozens of state and local Planned Parenthood member organizations.

“Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable. In particular, restricting Members’ ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs,” Talwani, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, wrote in the 58-page ruling.

Planned Parenthood sued the Trump Administration over its funding cuts written into the newly-passed reconciliation bill.

The House passed the Big Beautiful Bill earlier this month and President Trump signed in on July 4th at the White House.

“Everyone deserves access to high-quality, affordable health care. That’s what we’ve been fighting for the last century — and we’ll never stop,” President and CEO of Planned Parenthood Alexis McGill Johnson said earlier this month. “We’ll be suing the Trump administration to stop this unlawful attack. See you in court.”

The post NEW: Obama Judge Issues NATIONWIDE Block on Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Provision Barring Funding for Planned Parenthood appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In the Middle of the Sold-Out Oasis Reunion Tour, Older Brother to Rockers Noel and Liam Galagher Is Charged With Rape and Related Sex Offenses

Paul Gallagher/Instagram.

His brothers are famous – and now he has become infamous.

As the Oasis reunion tour takes Britain by storm, a family member to the band leaders is facing prosecution in a high-profile criminal case.

It arises now that the older brother of Noel and Liam Gallagher has been charged with rape and a string of related violent sex offences.

Daily Mail reported:

“Paul Gallagher, from East Finchley in north London, is facing the charges following an investigation that began last year.

As well as rape, he is also accused of sexual assault, coercive control and making threats to kill. He is due to appear in court next month.”

Liam, Noel and Paul Gallagher: a family of troublemakers?

While Noel and Liam are considered to be two of the greatest troublemakers in rock, apparently their older sibling is a much more complicated character.

The offences Paul is charged with date from between 2022 and 2024 and relate to just one woman.

“Paul, who at 59 is one year older than Noel and seven years older than Liam, grew up with the pair in Burnage, Manchester.”

He has worked as a DJ and photographer, always living under the shadow of his younger brothers.

Paul lives in a flat that Noel bought in 2004 and has worked as a DJ and photographer.

He has said that he tries to avoid public attention, and prefers to remain ‘invisible’.

“A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said: ‘Paul Gallagher, 59, of East Finchley, has been charged with rape, coercive and controlling behavior, three counts of sexual assault, three counts of intentional strangulation, two counts of making a threat to kill and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The offences are reported to have taken place between 2022-2024. The charges follow an investigation which commenced in 2024’.”

Read more:

Jane’s Addiction’s Members Sue Singer Perry Farrell for $10 Million Over 2024 Incident in Which He Punched Guitarist Dave Navarro Onstage and Collapsed Their Reunion Tour (VIDEO)

The post In the Middle of the Sold-Out Oasis Reunion Tour, Older Brother to Rockers Noel and Liam Galagher Is Charged With Rape and Related Sex Offenses appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Vance Goes off on Fake News After AP Reporter Asks Him If GOP is Protecting P*dophiles by ‘Shielding’ Epstein List (VIDEO)

Vice President JD Vance went off on an AP reporter during remarks on tax cuts in Canton, Ohio, at a steel factory.

“I guess I’m going to be that person. There are some protestors outside accusing the GOP of protecting pedophiles, and we’re wondering what you think are the reasons the U.S. government should shield the client list of Epstein from the public?” the Associated Press reporter asked Vance.

Vance unleashed on the reporter.

“Well, let me just say a couple of things. First of all.. we’re not shielding anything. The President has directed the Attorney General to release all critical information and frankly to go find additional credible information related to the Jeffrey Epstein case – he’s been incredibly transparent about that stuff, but some of that stuff takes time,” Vance said.

“I got to make an observation. There’s an interesting thing about this case that the American media seems to totally ignore,” Vance said.

“For four years under Joe Biden’s Department of Justice, the media didn’t give a damn about the Epstein files or about the Epstein case for literally 20 years the story about this scumbag…for 20 years you had Obama and George W Bush’s DOJ go easy on this guy…they didn’t fully investigate the case… and now Donald J Trump is asking his DOJ to show full transparency and somehow that’s a criticism of Donald J Trump and not Barack Obama and and George W. Bush!” Vance said.

WATCH:

President Trump’s DOJ has asked three federal courts to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking cases.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has also interviewed Epstein’s ‘pimp’ Ghislaine Maxwell at the prison last week.

The post Vance Goes off on Fake News After AP Reporter Asks Him If GOP is Protecting P*dophiles by ‘Shielding’ Epstein List (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

New Revelations in the Bryan Kohberger Case: Unsealed Documents Detail His Post-Arrest Interview and More

Details about quadruple murderer Brian Kohberger’s first interview have been released as the gag order on the case was lifted following his guilty plea.

Kohberger was sentenced to four consecutive life sentences without parole last week for the brutal murders of University of Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin.

Following Kohberger’s change of plea to guilty, Ada County Judge Steven Hippler lifted a long-standing gag order that had restricted public dissemination of information about the investigation and proceedings. Immediately following his sentencing hearing, the Moscow Police Department released hundreds of previously sealed documents.

One of the most anticipated pieces of new information was reports on Kohberger’s first formal interaction with law enforcement following his arrest on December 30, 2022, at his parents’ home in Pennsylvania. The interview took place at the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in Stroudsburg, conducted by detectives from the Idaho State Police and FBI agents who had traveled to question him.

According to the documents, the conversation began casually, with Kohberger engaging in small talk about his academic pursuits. As a criminology Ph.D. student at Washington State University (WSU) at the time of the murders, he discussed his background in criminal justice, his role as a teaching assistant, and his recent cross-country travels between Washington and Pennsylvania. He even remarked to one detective, “You do look familiar.”

“Knowledge was far more important to him than money,” police said of Kohberger’s attitude, adding that he said he “loved being in college.”

At one point, the murderer said he “would appreciate it if we [police] would explain to him what he was doing there.”

The detective responded by asking Kohberger why he thought they were there, to which he deflected and said he would prefer to be told.

“Det. Gilbertson said we were there because of what occurred in Moscow but did not provide any further detail,” the report says.

The tone shifted when investigators broached the topic of the Moscow homicides. Kohberger acknowledged receiving a crime alert on his phone from the university shortly after the killings, but claimed to know few details about the incident. When pressed further on whether he wished to discuss the murders, he responded, “Well, I think I would need a lawyer,” effectively invoking his Fifth Amendment rights and ending the substantive portion of the interview.

No further questioning occurred without legal representation.

The report states:

Kohberger sat back and said he had the utmost respect for law enforcement but stated it was a constitutional right to speak to an attorney. Det. Gilbertson affirmed this. Kohberger then reengaged and said the only thing he heard of from Moscow was an alert that came to his phone. Kohberger then said he wanted to talk to an attorney. Det. Gilbertson said we would stop now because Kohberger wanted to speak to an attorney. Kohberger then asked where his parents were and were his dog was. Kohberger reengaged again and asked what questions we would have for him. Det. Gilbertson then asked Kohberger again if he understood his rights and asked specifically what Kohberger wished. Kohberger asked what specifically we wanted to talk to him about and the reason. I told Kohberger he invoked his Fifth Amendment Rights and we were not going to ask him any further questions. Kohberger asked again for the reason he was there but added he would like to talk to an attorney. At this point, we concluded our interview with Kohberger and left the room.

The documents detail several unsettling incidents involving Kohberger before the murders. Female students at WSU reported feeling uncomfortable around him, citing instances where he allegedly used his teaching assistant position to interact inappropriately, such as following them on social media or making unsolicited comments.

A former friend, identified only as “L,” described Kohberger as intelligent but selfish, noting that he often misled others about collaborative work and displayed injuries on his face and hands— including a large scratch and wounded knuckles, which he attributed to a car accident.

Autopsy reports also confirmed the savagery of the attacks, with all four victims dying from sharp-force injuries inflicted by a single-edged, non-serrated knife.

Ethan Chapin suffered a fatal stab wound under his left clavicle, severing major blood vessels. Xana Kernodle endured over 50 stab wounds, many defensive, with lethal injuries to her heart and lung. Madison Mogen had lacerations to her liver and lung, while Kaylee Goncalves sustained over 20 stab wounds, including damage to her liver, lung, brain, and subclavian artery, along with evidence of blunt force and asphyxial trauma.

The post New Revelations in the Bryan Kohberger Case: Unsealed Documents Detail His Post-Arrest Interview and More appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.