RFK Jr. Lauded as Hero After U.S. Rejects WHO’s Expanded Pandemic Powers

United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

 

RFK Jr. just said NO to the World Health Organization’s new pandemic rules, a blueprint for medical tyranny, which would have given the WHO authority to impose global lockdowns, travel bans, school closures, vaccine passports, and digital health IDs. The treaty would bypass Congress and allow the WHO to impose restrictions on Americans without checks and balances and without the consent of the American people.

On July 18, 2025, the United States officially rejected key amendments to the World Health Organization’s pandemic preparedness treaty, citing concerns over national sovereignty and vague, overreaching authority that could allow the WHO to unilaterally declare health emergencies and impose mandates.

United States Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Secretary of State Marco Rubio jointly denounced the treaty, warning that it lacked public input, used ambiguous language, and elevated political ideals like “solidarity” above national preparedness. They also flagged provisions for global surveillance, digital health documentation, and narrative control, raising fears of international censorship and institutionalized propaganda.

Kennedy explained, in a video statemen, that the WHO’s new amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) would effectively strip nations of their decision-making power during health emergencies. “Nations who accept the new regulations are signing over their power to an unelected international organization that could order lockdowns, travel restrictions, or any other measures it sees fit,” he said. Worse still, the WHO wouldn’t even need to declare a health emergency, “potential” risks could be enough to trigger intervention.

Kennedy criticized the Biden-era push for adopting the amendments without public debate, especially given the treaty’s sweeping consequences. “If we’re going to give the WHO that much power, we should at least invite a thorough public debate, especially since the agreement is an official treaty and it bypasses the U.S. Senate,” he said. He also warned that the amendments would require countries to implement “risk communication systems” enabling global messaging dictated by the WHO, essentially legalizing the type of narrative management and censorship seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The treaty also called for digital health IDs, vaccine passports, and a centralized medical database, laying what Kennedy described as the foundation for “global medical surveillance of every human being.” He condemned the move as an elite-driven power grab: “The United States of America has a Constitution for a reason. We can’t let it be stripped from us by international bureaucrats and their bosses at the billionaire boys’ club in Davos.”

This latest move aligns with President Trump’s longstanding distrust of the World Health Organization and broader skepticism of global institutions. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, Trump had called out international organizations like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and climate accords, accusing them of exploiting the United States. His fiscal year 2021 budget proposal included a 50% cut to WHO funding, signaling early intent to reduce U.S. involvement.

Trump’s direct confrontation with the WHO escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic. He accused the organization of being biased toward China, citing its early praise of Beijing’s pandemic response and silence on China’s suppression of whistleblowing doctors. He also faulted the WHO for spreading misinformation, opposing travel bans, and reacting too slowly to the crisis. Trump argued that, despite the United States being one of the WHO’s largest donors, the organization failed to uphold transparency or accountability.

In April 2020, Trump suspended U.S. funding to the WHO pending a review, and by July, his administration began formal withdrawal proceedings. That decision was reversed by President Biden in 2021.

Now in his second term, Trump has followed through. On January 20, 2025, he signed an executive order formally withdrawing the U.S. from the WHO. The order cited national sovereignty, unfair financial contributions, and the WHO’s failure to enact reforms or resist political pressure from member states. It instructed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to cease participation in WHO treaty negotiations, pause U.S. funding transfers, and reassign any federal personnel working with the organization. Trump also declared that recent amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations would have no legal force in the United States.

RFK Jr. emphasized (in a May 20 speech to the World Health Assembly) that while the U.S. remains committed to global health, it prefers cooperation outside the WHO framework, aiming for new, transparent agreements aligned with American values and sovereignty. Congress has supported this move: Republicans passed resolutions conditioning future WHO engagement on Senate approval and triggered funding cuts. The current administration continues to prioritize national autonomy in health policymaking.

The post RFK Jr. Lauded as Hero After U.S. Rejects WHO’s Expanded Pandemic Powers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

JUST IN: Astronomer CEO Resigns Days After Viral Video of Coldplay Kiss Cam Embrace With HR Exec Went Global

Tech company Astronomer announced Saturday that CEO Andy Byron has resigned following the global embarrassment of being seen canoodling with the company’s Chief People Officer Kristin Cabot in viral videos of the Kiss Cam at a Coldplay concert last Wednesday at Gillette Stadium near Boston.

Viral video screen image.

The Astronomer statement did not mention the status of Cabot, however in a previous statement the firm said another employee rumored to be in the video was in fact not at the concert. Axios reported Friday that Byron and Cabot had been placed on leave.

Byron’s wife, Megan Kerrigan Byron, dropped her married name from her Facebook page Thursday before deleting the page altogether.

As stated previously, Astronomer is committed to the values and culture that have guided us since our founding. Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met.

Andy Byron has tendered his resignation, and the Board of Directors has accepted. The Board will begin a search for our next Chief Executive as Cofounder and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy continues to serve as interim CEO.

Before this week, we were known as a pioneer in the DataOps space, helping data teams power everything from modern analytics to production AI.

While awareness of our company may have changed overnight, our product and our work for our customers have not.

We’re continuing to do what we do best: helping our customers with their toughest data and AI problems.

The couple’s stunned, embarrassed reaction to being seen on camera brought a reaction from Coldplay singer Chris Martin and helped drive millions of views of videos of the incident.

Martin commented as he watched the couple react to being on the Kiss Cam screen, “Oh, look at these two. Alright, come on, you’re okay. Oh, what? Either they’re having an affair or they’re just very shy.”

The illicit embrace seen ’round the world:

View from near the stage:

The Philadelphia Phillies had their Phillie Phanatic mascots lampoon the Coldplay Kiss Cam moment at a game Friday night:

This man came prepared:

The post JUST IN: Astronomer CEO Resigns Days After Viral Video of Coldplay Kiss Cam Embrace With HR Exec Went Global appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Antiglobalism Didn’t Start with Trump: The U.S. Has Always Defended Its Sovereignty

Modified version of “The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor,” originally published by Nathaniel Currier, c. 1846. Image in the public domain. Text “ANTI-GLOBALISM” added by Antonio Graceffo via AI-generated editing (2025).

 

The Trump administration’s refusal to sign recent amendments to the World Health Organization’s pandemic treaty drew criticism from the political left, but this decision fits into a long-standing American tradition of rejecting international agreements that could undermine U.S. sovereignty.

Throughout history, and especially under President Trump, the United States has opposed transnational organizations and treaties that threaten to override domestic law, bypass Congress, or cede authority to foreign institutions.

During his first term (2017–2021), President Trump withdrew the United States from several key international agreements. On his third day in office, he pulled out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), arguing that the deal would cost 2.7 million American jobs by 2025 and weaken U.S. manufacturing. Trump said the treaty would “hamstring” American industry and preferred bilateral trade deals that better protected American workers.

In June 2017, Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, stating, “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.” He argued the accord imposed unfair economic burdens on the United States while giving countries like China a pass. Trump viewed it as a threat to American sovereignty and energy independence.

Later that year, in October 2017, the administration announced its decision to leave UNESCO, citing the agency’s “anti-Israel bias,” specifically referencing UNESCO’s 2011 admission of Palestine as a full member and the resulting financial disputes. The withdrawal became effective in December 2018.

In May 2018, Trump exited the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal. He called it one of the worst agreements the U.S. had ever entered, claiming it enriched Iran, enabled hostile activity, and merely delayed rather than stopped Iran’s nuclear weapons development.

One month later, in June 2018, the U.S. left the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Trump administration, led by Ambassador Nikki Haley, condemned the council as hypocritical and biased against Israel. Critics pointed to the presence of human rights violators like China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, and Venezuela on the council, some even holding leadership roles.

In 2015, Saudi Arabia chaired the Advisory Committee; in 2020, China joined the group selecting rights investigators; and in 2023, Iran chaired a forum on promoting human rights through technology. These appointments reinforced Trump’s argument that the council rewarded abusers while ignoring their violations.

In July 2020, the administration notified the UN of its intention to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing its mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and its deference to China during the early stages of the outbreak. The administration accused the WHO of spreading misinformation about the virus and failing to enact necessary reforms.

During his second term (2025), President Trump again withdrew from the WHO, this time in response to newly proposed amendments that would allow the organization to impose global mandates, such as lockdowns and vaccine passports, without U.S. consent. The administration stated the treaty would bypass Congress and erode American constitutional protections.

In February 2025, the United States withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council for a second time, again citing anti-Israel bias. That same month, the Trump administration halted all U.S. funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), citing ties between UNRWA staff and Hamas, as well as broader concerns about the agency’s operations.

Also in 2025, the Trump administration announced a global rollback of USAID programs, eliminating more than 90% of foreign aid contracts and cutting $60 billion in assistance worldwide.

The move, framed under the “America First” agenda, aimed to reduce overseas commitments and redirect resources to domestic priorities. In an executive order, Trump stated that many foreign aid programs were “antithetical to American values” and accused them of destabilizing peace by promoting harmful ideologies.

Specific cuts targeted funding for DEI and LGBTQ initiatives abroad, including $1.5 million for LGBTQ employment programs in Serbia, $70,000 for a DEI musical in Ireland, $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia, and $3.3 million for LGBTQ advocacy in the Caribbean.

The administration also cited concerns over USAID grants allegedly linked to groups under investigation for ties to terrorism. According to the State Department, the cuts were part of a broader effort to eliminate “waste” and ensure taxpayer money advanced U.S. interests rather than foreign ideological agendas.

Trump also refused to sign several international agreements during his presidency. In 2017, his administration rejected the Global Compact for Migration, a non-binding UN agreement aimed at coordinating international migration policy. Then–Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the pact could undermine the United States’ sovereign right to enforce immigration laws and secure its borders.

In 2019, Trump “unsigned” the Arms Trade Treaty, which regulates the international trade of conventional weapons. He argued the treaty threatened Second Amendment rights and stated, “We will never surrender American sovereignty to anyone.”

This tendency long predates Trump. But under Trump, it is clear that the priority is America First, not the Globalist Agenda First.

The post Antiglobalism Didn’t Start with Trump: The U.S. Has Always Defended Its Sovereignty appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Smoking Gun: Biden White House Colluded with Merrick Garland on Memo Labeling Parents ‘Domestic Terrorists’

America First Legal obtained new documents proving what we knew to be true all along: Merrick Garland’s infamous memo labeling concerned parents at school board meetings “domestic terrorists” was politically orchestrated and driven by the Biden White House.

In October 2021, Mark Levin broadcast a letter with insider information on the teachers union, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and the FBI who met and organized how to combat America’s parents who were speaking out at local school board meetings across the country.

The parents were outraged at the COVID masking and vaccination rules, critical race theory indoctrination and open porn disguised as literature promoted in American schools.

Biden’s Attorney General Merrick Garland even sent federal agents and a helicopter circling overhead to threaten parents attending the Fairfax County School Board meeting in Virginia.

This was after Garland testified and said he was not sending the feds to threaten American parents who speak out at their local school board meetings.

Merrick Garland labeled the concerned parents “domestic terrorists” in a memo addressing the “disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence” toward school officials.

Parents showed up to school board meetings to reject the porn and LGBTQ propaganda being forced on their children and Merrick Garland called them terrorists.

America First Legal previously sued to obtain documents related to Merrick Garland’s memo and on Friday it was revealed the Biden White House coordinated with Garland to terrorize concerned parents.

“We’re aware; the challenge here is finding a federal hook. But WH has been in touch about whether we can assist in some form or fashion,” Biden’s Deputy Attorney General aide Kevin Chambers wrote in an October 2021 email.

“These new documents expose the Biden White House’s involvement in AG Garland’s memo targeting parents — and reveal that career lawyers at DOJ warned that there was no federal authority or legal basis to target these parents in the first place because their speech is protected by the First Amendment,” AFL said.

The DOJ actually knew there was no law to stop parents from exercising their First Amendment rights at school board meetings.

“The documents show that after receiving the National School Board Association (NSBA) memo, which called on DOJ to use the Patriot Act to prevent parents from objecting to mask mandates in schools and Critical Race Theory in the curriculum, DOJ’s political leadership worked to identify anything — any authority — they could use to bring the full weight of the Justice Department down on parents,” AFL said.

Biden’s DOJ continued to march forward with terrorizing parents even though they knew they were violating their rights.

Several different Civil Rights Division attorneys expressed concern with Merrick Garland’s memo targeting parents.

The post Smoking Gun: Biden White House Colluded with Merrick Garland on Memo Labeling Parents ‘Domestic Terrorists’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Cockpit Recording Suggests Captain of Air India Flight 171 CUT THE FUEL TO THE ENGINES of Boeing 787 Just Before the Crash That Killed 260 Passengers and Crew

Screengrab montage of CCTV video showing the Air India Flight 171 crash/Wiki Commons

The investigation deadly crash of Air India flight 171 that took place 5 weeks ago keeps revealing disturbing facts regarding the circumstances of the accident.

Now, according to U.S. officials’ early assessment of flight recorder evidence, it arises that a cockpit audio recording of dialogue between the pilots supports the conclusion that the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane’s engines.

Reuters reported:

“The first officer was at the controls of the Boeing 787 and asked the captain why he moved the fuel switches into a position that starved the engines of fuel and requested that he restore the fuel flow, the source told Reuters on condition of anonymity because the matter remains under investigation.

The U.S. assessment is not contained in a formal document, said the source, who emphasized the cause of the June 12 crash in Ahmedabad, India, that killed 260 people remains under investigation.”

No cockpit video recording exists, and Indian authorities are unhappy about the reports blaming the pilot.

“India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), which is leading the investigation into the crash, said in a statement on Thursday that “certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting.” It added the investigation was ongoing and it remained too early to draw definitive conclusions.”

Captain Sumeet Sabharwal/source: Social media.

The preliminary report shows that one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other ‘why he cut off the fuel’ and the other pilot responds that he did not do so.”

The fuel switches had gone from ‘run’ to ‘cutoff’ just after takeoff.

The crash killed 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 aboard the flight.

Indian PM Modi visits a crash site of the AI-171 flight/Photo by Prime Minister’s Office (GODL-India) – Wiki Commons.

Read more:

Air India Flight 171: Pilot’s Medical Records Handed to Investigators, Reportedly Struggling with Mental Health Issues – Reports Say a Crew Member Cut off Fuel to Engines

The post Cockpit Recording Suggests Captain of Air India Flight 171 CUT THE FUEL TO THE ENGINES of Boeing 787 Just Before the Crash That Killed 260 Passengers and Crew appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Embattled Fed Chair Jerome Powell Pulls Another Shady Stunt After Trump Officials Request Tour of $2.5 Billion in Building ‘Renovations’

Fed Chair Jerome Powell pulled another shady stunt after Trump officials requested a tour of the so-called $2.5 billion in building ‘renovations.’

Chairman of the Board of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Bill Pulte, revealed Jerome Powell offered a tour of the renovations on Friday night when no one was there.

Powell is under fire for the cost of renovating the Fed’s DC headquarters. The cost ballooned from $1.9 billion to $2.5 billion.

“Powell has asked the central bank’s inspector general to conduct an additional review of the ongoing renovation, CNN previously reported. Last month, some Senate lawmakers grilled Powell over what they depicted as lavish upgrades to its DC headquarters at Powell’s semiannual monetary policy hearing,’ CNN reported.

“The Fed’s renovation project was approved by its board in 2017 and originally cost $1.9 billion in 2019. Construction began in 2021, but the cost swelled to $2.5 billion because of “unforeseen conditions” requiring more spending to rectify, such as “more asbestos than anticipated, toxic contamination in soil, and a higher-than-expected water table,” according to the Fed’s website,” CNN reported.

“Per The White House’s James Blair, Jerome Powell offered Our Group a Tour at 7pm last evening, when no one was doing so called renovations. Very disappointing! Yet another example of Powell dodging. Makes one even more concerned — where did this Billion $2.5 go?” Pulte said.

On Thursday Bill Pulte said Fed Chair Jerome Powell may be criminally referred to the Justice Department for alleged perjury about the $2.5 billion building renovation plan.

“I am told by very reliable Congressional sources that there may be a criminal referral coming from one or more Congress members to the DOJ for Jay Powell’s alleged perjury about the $2.5BN building,” Pulte said on X.

An hour later, GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna criminally referred Jerome Powell over the renovation insanity.

President Trump earlier this week said Jerome Powell’s renovation scandal may be enough to fire him as the Fed Chair.

“I can’t imagine why the Fed would need a palace,” Trump said.

WATCH:

The post Embattled Fed Chair Jerome Powell Pulls Another Shady Stunt After Trump Officials Request Tour of $2.5 Billion in Building ‘Renovations’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Amid Collapsing Morale, Ukrainians ‘Lost Faith’ in Zelensky, With 70% Convinced That Kiev Regime Leaders Are Using the War to Enrich Themselves: REPORT

NO LONGER CHURCHILL: Zelensky has outlived his mandate and become an authoritarian leader.

Ukrainians have had enough of Zelensky.

During the three and a half years of the war in Ukraine, the western Globalist politicians and the obedient mainstream media have painted Volodymyr Zelensky as the defender of democracy, a historical, mythological figure comparable to WW2’s Winston Churchill.

Then, of course, came Donald J. Trump, calling him ‘a moderately successful comedian’, ‘the greatest salesman on earth’, and ‘a dictator, with no elections’.

Now, even as Trump promised Kiev air defenses with new Patriot batteries and is threatening Russia’s Vladimir Putin with sanctions, a Spectator article shows Ukraine about to be ‘engulfed in a critical military, political and social crisis that threatens to destroy it from within.’

Spectator reported:

“Putin chose war over peace this spring because his spies and generals told him that Ukraine is on the brink of collapse. Alarmingly, they may be right. Ukraine is running out of fighting men, its frontline soldiers are exhausted and US military support has narrowed to focus on air defense. The Kiev government is racked by corruption scandals and purges, public faith in their future and in their leaders is tanking and pressure to make peace at almost any price is growing.”

Ukranians now believe that their leaders – like Zelensky – prolong the war for personal profit.

Former officials are quoted saying that they believe Zelensky is ‘prolonging the war to hold on to power.’

“Now 47 per cent think that ‘Ukraine will be a depopulated country with a ruined economy’. A separate survey found that 70 per cent of Ukrainians also believe their leaders are using the war to enrich themselves.”

While ministers are investigated for ‘embezzlement and treason’, it took pressure from the US embassy in Kiev to keep Zelensky from firing Major General Kyrylo Budanov, the head of Ukraine’s military intelligence – because of his growing popularity.

“‘Ukraine has two enemies, two Vladimirs: Zelensky and Putin,’ says a former Ukrainian cabinet minister, once a strong Zelensky supporter. ‘Putin is destroying Ukraine from [the] outside, but Zelensky is destroying it from within by destroying its will to fight and its morale.”

Kiev under attack: Ukrainians feel like expendable pawns in a geopolitical chess.

Zelensky’s presidential mandate expired in May last year, but he is still exiling some potential opponents, imprisoning and sanctioning others.

He is also running out of troops.

Almost 7 million citizens have fled the country, and no less than 230k criminal cases have been opened for desertion since the war started.

“More soldiers have deserted the Ukrainian army than there are fighting men in today’s British, French and German armies combined.

[…] No outsiders can reverse the spiral of arrests of former regime loyalists, crackdown on opposition members and shutdown of media outlets that are doing so much to erode Ukrainians’ faith in the war effort and in Zelensky’s leadership.”

Read more:

Despite His Change in Tone, Trump Still Sees Putin as a Negotiating Partner and Zelensky as the Main Obstacle to a Peace Deal: REPORT

The post Amid Collapsing Morale, Ukrainians ‘Lost Faith’ in Zelensky, With 70% Convinced That Kiev Regime Leaders Are Using the War to Enrich Themselves: REPORT appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Alex Jones: The Deep State Declared War on the American People

Alex Jones: Americans want indictments. We don’t just want the head of the FBI in New York fired for covering up the files. We want him arrested. We want him indicted. We want Marine Comedy and his father—who lied under oath to Congress and admitted it over and over—held accountable.

These people declared war on America. We accept the challenge. We’ve secured a major beachhead. We’re winning. But now we must launch the offensive, because our enemies are cornered—they’re vicious rats. And now is the time. This is existential.

Ed Martin, whom they fear—I believe he is the man. Not

The post Alex Jones: The Deep State Declared War on the American People appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Red, White, and Bitcoin

This story originally was published by Real Clear Wire.

By Logan Beirne

Bitcoin may feel futuristic, but when you peel away its digital veneer, it is just the latest chapter in a 2,600-year story of value, trust, and human ingenuity. Having reached record highs, Bitcoin has been making headlines as nations declare strategic stockpiles and corporate America embraces the new asset class. Why now?

The answer lies in a pattern as old as civilization itself: When governments corrupt a currency, people innovate their way to something better.

As the saying goes, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” When the first coin clanked into existence in 600 B.C., it was not merely a gold and silver alloy stamped with the face of the Lydian king. It was a financial revolution. For the first time, people could move past the inefficiencies of barter and instead use a medium of exchange to trade. But this value was not in the sparkle; it was the individuals’ collective understanding that these coins have worth.

The integrity of that system has waxed and waned over the ensuing millennia, typically driven by governmental spending policies. The silver-backed Roman denarii enabled the empire to flourish, but as subsequent emperors diluted its value – reducing their silver content to fund wars and build grand palaces – citizens lost faith in their currency. When Emperor Nero reduced silver content from 98% to 83% in A.D. 64, Romans began hoarding old coins and rejecting new ones. By A.D. 260, the denarius contained just 5% silver. Inflation spiraled and commerce crumbled, contributing to the eventual fall of the empire.

The United States has battled currency crises since our nation’s birth, but unlike Rome, America has consistently innovated solutions along the way. After we declared independence from Britain, the Continental Congress printed the nation’s first paper money. Called “Continentals,” it was backed by neither gold nor silver – simply by belief in its value. While gold and silver are at least relatively scarce metals that constrain supply, paper can be printed. And that is precisely what the first U.S. government did.

Desperate to pay troops and buy supplies necessary to wage the Revolutionary War, Congress turned to making more Continentals. Bills flooded the market, driving down value as Americans questioned whether the new nation could honor its promises. In 1777, one patriot complained to his father as inflation spiked by an estimated 200%, writing, “America has much more to fear from the effects of large quantities of paper money than from the operations of British Generals.”

Prices climbed so rapidly that George Washington himself came to refuse Continentals as payment. In fact, it became common to describe something of little value as “not worth a Continental.” The currency became such a laughingstock that sailors paid in the bills would sew them onto their clothes and parade through town to mock it. But rather than crumble like the Roman Empire, the U.S. innovated: This currency crisis was a driving force that led our Founding Fathers to scrap the American government under the Articles of Confederation and draft our current Constitution.

This change represented more than political reform – it was monetary advancement, shifting from discretionary to rule-based money. The new U.S. government adopted a bimetallic standard in 1792, which tied the value of dollars to both gold and silver. The country eventually simplified its approach by shifting to a de facto gold standard in 1834, which lasted until 1971 when President Nixon abandoned it in favor of fiat currency. Like the Continentals before it, the dollar has since been backed by belief in its value: full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

And then came the 2008 financial crisis. Lehman Brothers fell, banks wobbled, and the public? They started asking: “What is money?” It was then, from the digital shadows, that an anonymous figure – Satoshi Nakamoto – dropped a whitepaper like a patriot dropping a leaflet on the eve of the Revolutionary War: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. No emperors. No banks. Just math, cryptography, and an unbreakable record called the blockchain. A new kind of trust was born – not in a ruler, but in code.

What was initially viewed as an interesting hypothetical idea was quickly put to real-world use. Users beget more users. Trust grows. Entrepreneurs dream. It’s a full-blown historical saga unfolding in real time.

Bitcoin has risen above the other cryptocurrencies it inspired, in large part due to its scarcity: no longer could an Emperor add bits of cheap copper to silver coins or Congress print more paper because it is hardcoded that only 21 million Bitcoin will ever exist. Further, all Bitcoin transactions are verified by a decentralized network of approximately 20,000 individuals’ computers across the world, all checking one another beyond politicians’ control. In an age of runaway government spending, investors have turned to those scarce Bitcoin that no government can dilute. A decentralized system that guards the people from government domination – how American is that!

It is no coincidence that Bitcoin has skyrocketed to a $2 trillion valuation just as the U.S. national debt has reached record highs. Researchers debate how long fiat currencies last on average throughout history, with some placing time of death at between 27 and 35 years. Since the U.S. has been off the gold standard for over 50 years, history suggests the dollar is poised for decline.

People are simply asking the age-old question: What is money, really? As trust is shaken in paper money due to inflation and ballooning federal spending, many are turning to innovation. Even nations themselves have begun to set up strategic reserves. In fact, the United States is the largest known state holder of Bitcoin – once again positioning America at the forefront of monetary evolution.

As John Adams advised in 1787, “All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise not from the defects of the Constitution, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.” It is incumbent upon Americans to arm themselves with knowledge and engage in the age-old American tradition of challenging broken systems with better ideas in the pursuit of liberty.

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

Logan Beirne serves as the chief legal officer at Strive and is the bestselling author of “Blood of Tyrants.” He teaches corporate law at Yale Law School. 

The post Red, White, and Bitcoin appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren Backs Zohran Mamdani’s Proposal For State-Owned Grocery Stores (VIDEO)

Senator Elizabeth Warren has thrown her support behind New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s proposal for government-owned grocery stores.

During an appearance on CNBC Squawk Box on Friday, the Massachusetts Senator was asked about some of Mamdani’s most radical proposals, which include the state owning and subsidizing groceries with its own stores.

She explained:

We’ve got a problem with entire food deserts where people can’t get access to grocery stores.

He said, I’d like to take a look at whether or not we can have some kind of — like we do on military bases — you have some kind of support from the city government that says, we’re going to get some food, grocery stores in areas that, right now, are food deserts.

And by the way, it’s a new and fresh plan for New York City. But it’s been tried in other cities around the country and has had some real successes.

So, what I hear Mamdani say is, I want to try things to make it work for working families. And you know what? This is how democracy works.

A lot of people in New York City said, that sounds good to me, I’d rather try that than any of the other alternatives available to me, I support that.

Watch the clip below:

Such a policy of state-run grocery stores has been tried unsucessfully many times in communist societies, most notably the Soviet Union that ended up collapsing under its own contradictions.

Yet this is just one of a number of crazy ideas put forward by the 35-year-old Mamdani, who triumphed against the competition during last month’s Democratic primary.

As a New York State Assemblyman, Mamdani has waged a longstanding campaign aimed at defunding the New York Police Department, which he claims are designed to “control black, brown and poor New Yorkers.”

He also believes that defunding the police is essential for the cause of “queer liberation,” and law enforcement is complicit in aiding a “violent, right-wing government” in persecuting minorities.

Meet Zohran Mamdani: A Muslim Communist Who Wants to ‘Defund The Police’ and ‘Globalize The Intifada’

 

The post Sen. Elizabeth Warren Backs Zohran Mamdani’s Proposal For State-Owned Grocery Stores (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.