The H1B Visa Scam — It’s Bigger and Worse Than We Thought

Vishwanatha Badikana, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

President Trump recently cracked down on the H1B visa program, requiring companies to pay $100,000 to sponsor a worker.

The program was originally intended to bring in temporary employees with highly specialized skills that few Americans possessed. H

owever, as the White House proclamation states, the H-1B program “has been deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers.”

In practice, it now serves to import general IT and tech workers, displacing Americans and driving down wages.

Investigations have uncovered widespread fraud: fake applicants, forged documents, and shell companies that sponsor visas and then place workers into U.S. firms on contract.

Over the past 30 years, a pattern has emerged in which hiring an Indian HR manager often leads to a steady increase in Indian workers until Americans become a minority in certain departments or entire companies.

Wages are suppressed, discouraging Americans from entering these fields and reinforcing the false claim that there are jobs Americans “won’t” or “can’t” do.

In reality, Americans will take any job if the pay is fair, and proper wages motivate them to pursue training. The proof lies in recent layoffs: in 2022, the top 30 companies brought in 34,000 new H-1B workers even as they cut at least 85,000 staff.

The new Trump policy will reduce the number of new H1B visas issued but does nothing about the roughly 600,000 holders already in the country. The dishonesty and scope of the problem are far greater than most people realize.

Salvatore Militello, who has spent decades in the IT sector as both a technician and later a recruiter, told me in an interview how the H1B program has harmed the industry.

“I started working with Microsoft in around the year 2000. And then I became independent. From 2000 to about 2015 or 2016, there was this trend of bringing people from India over to Microsoft. I would occasionally work on campus, managing these difficult projects for Microsoft. They were called rescue projects.”

He recalled companies claiming they couldn’t find qualified Americans, but he didn’t believe it. “I’m thinking, yes, you can find people.” The reality, he said, was that companies simply didn’t want to pay American wages.

Militello noted that salaries offered to Indian workers were 30 to 40 percent below the market average, which in turn pushed wages across the board downward.

Across the industry, he saw a broader pattern of offshoring tied to H-1B visas.

“They had an offshore team, or they brought a mix of offshore and some of those onshore, which I used to call extended offshore, because that’s what they were with this H-1B business.”

COVID accelerated the trend. Once American employees were forced to work from home, companies found it easier to offshore jobs. Replacing remote U.S. staff with Indians working from India became seamless, and this also opened the door to bringing more Indian workers into the United States on H-1B visas to replace local employees.

According to Militello, the largest drivers of H-1B expansion have been Amazon, Microsoft, and LinkedIn. Amazon filed 10,969 Labor Condition Applications in fiscal year 2024, leading to 10,044 approvals in 2025.

The White House cited similar patterns, noting that one firm was approved for more than 5,000 H-1B visas in 2025 while laying off 15,000 workers, and another cut 2,400 staff in Oregon while securing nearly 1,700 approvals.

Amazon remained the top sponsor, rising from 9,257 approvals in 2024 to 10,044 in 2025, an increase of 787. Other major firms, including Microsoft, Apple, Meta, and JPMorgan Chase, also expanded their H-1B sponsorships.

LinkedIn has played a critical role in fueling this deluge. Evidence shows Indian recruiters use the platform aggressively to promote visa opportunities and connect workers with American companies.

Reports describe more than 14,000 call centers in India, each employing 500 to 1,000 workers with access to LinkedIn, Dice, ChatGPT, and VoIP, and each recruiter given quotas for collecting résumés. At the center of this system is the “bench sales” model.

LinkedIn job searches show hundreds of listings in India for “Sr. Bench Sales Recruiters,” whose role is to market H-1B workers who are between projects and place them in U.S. companies as quickly as possible.

American job seekers are now familiar with aggressive Indian recruiters who contact them with vague offers, demand résumés and personal details, and provide little real information.

These résumés are often harvested to “spice up” Indian candidates’ profiles or to fabricate a paper trail showing that domestic workers were considered and rejected, even though the jobs are reserved for pre-selected H-1B applicants.

This explains why so many Americans are contacted repeatedly about jobs they never hear back on. Fake recruiters use domestic résumés as evidence of unsuccessful screenings, creating the documentation needed for visa fraud.

The business model depends on scale and low costs. Bench recruiters in India may earn about $1,000 per month, while agencies profit from each consultant placed.

Many LinkedIn postings explicitly require knowledge of visa categories (H-1B, OPT, CPT, GC, USC) and emphasize working with visa-holding consultants.

After moving into recruiting, Militello was asked to review résumés from Indian applicants.

“What I found was that applicants would say they were H-1B, but they weren’t. They were here illegally. How do I know? Because I checked.”

When he explained that without a valid visa the company could not sponsor them, applicants often replied, “That’s okay. I have a friend with a corporation in the U.S. You pay the corporation, and they will pay me.”

This was one of many scams.

Shell companies, sometimes listing large numbers of employees on paper, existed only to loan workers out on consultancy contracts to U.S. firms. The shell company, not the worker, received the salary.

To keep costs attractive, the rate charged to the hiring company was below market value, and the shell company took a cut, leaving the worker with only a fraction of the standard pay.

Militello recalled that when the going rate was $100 an hour, Indian workers sometimes ended up with just $60.

In addition to his interactions with job seekers, Militello described the constant outreach from Indian scam recruiters. “We’ve got 20 candidates and their first name is Singh, Amit, Sumit—you get it. Twenty of them.

And then they say, ‘We have these people that need work, do you have any positions open for them?’ You can’t do that. If you have the work, I’m not going to participate.” He shared one such email, which read:

“Hello,
Greetings for the Day!!
This is Ganesh, from Sainar Solutions INC., working as a Bench Sales Recruiter.
We have excellent consultants in our Bench, who are actively looking for projects on C2C/C2H.
Please let me know if you have any suitable requirements. Kindly share me the requirements with…”

The recruiter’s email itself demonstrates multiple violations.

The H-1B program requires a specific job that cannot be filled by an American worker, yet the email shows they had candidates first and were seeking jobs second, exactly the opposite of the law. It also implies the workers were “on the bench,” waiting without pay for placement, another violation of federal rules.

Finally, offering to supply workers through a third-party arrangement raises employer-employee relationship issues, since the sponsoring company may not actually control the worker’s employment.

The H-1B visa scam grew under Obama and exploded under Biden. Now it is being squelched by Trump.

The additional steps the president needs to take are scrutinizing and canceling many of the 600,000 existing H-1B visas, and shutting down the consulting companies and Indian recruiters that enable the system.

Given his speed and thoroughness, the administration may already be working on that.

The post The H1B Visa Scam — It’s Bigger and Worse Than We Thought appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Sean Duffy TORCHES Gavin Newsom’s Silence: “California Issued 25% of Non-Domiciled CDLs ILLEGALLY — Fix It or Lose Federal Funding!”

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is taking a sledgehammer to one of the most overlooked, yet dangerous scandals in our nation’s transportation system: states issuing commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) to illegal aliens.

This comes just one month after a major trucking accident involving an illegal alien driver. And now, the Department of Transportation’s nationwide audit has exposed a systemic breakdown that is putting every American family at risk on our highways.

Duffy revealed on Friday that the DOT’s audit uncovered widespread abuse and incompetence by state agencies responsible for issuing CDLs. The details are beyond infuriating:

  • States are failing to validate legal presence. Licenses are being issued to individuals without confirming their lawful immigration status.
  • CDLs are being extended far beyond lawful presence. In some cases, licenses are valid months — even years — after a driver’s work permit has expired.
  • Computer flaws and procedural errors have compounded the crisis, allowing unqualified, nondomiciled drivers to hit American roads.

Duffy didn’t hold back in his Friday announcement:

DUFFY: “We have launched a nationwide audit of nondomiciled CDLS to get the bottom of what we think in causing this crisis. Something was seriously wrong.

It was alleged that the open borders policies of the last administration has led to an exploitation of our nation’s trucking licensing system.

So I’m here to tell you that after an audit; these reports are all true!

What our audit has discovered should anger every single American.

Our audit revealed a systemic breakdown among states to follow the law and issue licenses properly. States are failing to follow even the most basic procedures.

We even uncovered widespread procedural errors, computer programming flaws, and a gross lack of oversight in the states that issue CDLs.

This means that thousands of licenses that should never have been issued actually were issued. States are issuing licenses that extend months and even years beyond a driver’s lawful presence in the US!

This is a direct incentive to stay in our country illegally beyond their authorized work permit. In some disturbing cases, they have failed to validate a driver’s lawful presence before handing them a commercial license.

It’s deeply disturbing, but even worse, our second finding was that the current federal regulations are allowing dangerous, unqualified drivers on American roadways. This means that even when the rules are being followed, dangerous individuals who shouldn’t be near a big rig, are getting behind the wheel and causing crashes on our roadways.”

Read more:

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy Releases Stunning Details Involving Nationwide Abuse In Issuing Commercial Drivers’ Licenses to Illegals – Issues a New Emergency Rule to Address Crisis (VIDEO)

In a blistering post on X, Duffy singled out California Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration:

“California is the worst offender when it comes to trucking licenses, according to @FMCSA’s ongoing audit: more than 25% of non-domiciled CDLs were issued ILLEGALLY! My message to @CAgovernor: You’re putting the safety of your citizens at risk. Fix it NOW. Here are the receipts.”

WATCH:

Instead of addressing the illegal licensing scandal, Newsom’s office tried to deflect, boasting that California’s CDL holders have a “fatal crash rate nearly 40% lower than the national average.” They even took a swipe at Texas, claiming its CDL drivers have a higher crash rate.

But that’s not what Duffy was talking about. He was pointing out blatant lawbreaking and regulatory noncompliance, not crash stats.

Newsom’s office wrote:

“It appears the Secretary of Transportation is having a challenging time understanding the road rules. Unlike him, we’ll stick to the facts: California commercial driver’s license holders have a fatal crash rate nearly 40% LOWER than the national average.

And when you look at Texas — the only state with more commercial holders — the lone star state has a rate almost 50% HIGHER than California. Facts don’t lie. But the Trump Admin does.”

Newsom is talking apples while Duffy is exposing the rotten oranges. He’s droning on about overall CDL crash rates by state, while Duffy is laser-focused on compliance with federal regulations for non-domiciled CDLs.

Duffy clapped back hard:

“What a disgusting response. No word from @CAgovernor, but his staff minions run to X to deflect from their state’s gross incompetence. You want a fact, Governor? Here’s one: California issued 25% of the state’s non-domiciled CDLs ILLEGALLY! Fix this problem or lose funding, it’s that simple.”

According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), a review of California’s CDL records found that one in four non-domiciled licenses were not compliant with federal regulations in 49 CFR parts 383 and 384.

Under Part 383, the federal rules define how commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) and commercial learner’s permits (CLPs) must be issued, tested, and maintained. It covers required knowledge and skills testing, categories and endorsements, disqualifications for offenses, and standards that ensure only qualified drivers operate large vehicles.

Meanwhile, Part 384 holds states accountable: it sets minimum program standards, outlines procedures for assessing state compliance, and defines consequences if a state fails to meet federal requirements.

Duffy’s audit is just the beginning. Expect more heads to roll as the DoT cracks down on this insanity. Americans deserve safe roads, not a highway to chaos courtesy of blue-state bureaucrats.

The post Sean Duffy TORCHES Gavin Newsom’s Silence: “California Issued 25% of Non-Domiciled CDLs ILLEGALLY — Fix It or Lose Federal Funding!” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Hillary Clinton Pushes Anti-White Christian Male Narrative After Charlie Kirk Assassination? | Drew Hernandez



On September 24, 2025, Hillary Clinton appeared on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and made comments that many found to be despicable. In her remarks, she highlighted how equality and progressive ideals are threatened by those on the right seeking to reverse societal advancements.

Clinton specifically stated that efforts to recreate a world dominated by “white men of a certain persuasion, a certain religion, a certain point of view, a certain ideology” are causing significant damage to the nation’s goals. She emphasized that such ideologies undermine the foundational principles of “We The People” and the idea that all are created equal. These comments came just two weeks after the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025.

Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!

Follow Drew on X: https://x.com/DrewHLive
Follow Drew on Rumble: https://rumble.com/DrewHernandez

The post Hillary Clinton Pushes Anti-White Christian Male Narrative After Charlie Kirk Assassination? | Drew Hernandez appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Is Wray Next?… Kash Patel Accuses Chris Wray of Lying to Congress about FBI Agents in the Crowd on January 6, 2021 – Calls Out His “Corrupt Leadership”

The massive patriotic crowd at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Little did they know their government planted 274 FBI agents in the crowd to create havoc that day. – screengrab

On Thursday night, the FBI finally acknowledged it had 274 plainclothes agents in the massive crowds on Jan. 6, 2021. This was hundreds more than was previously reported.

As the Gateway Pundit as previously reported — Dozens if not hundreds of government operatives infiltrated the protests at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.

The Gateway Pundit previously identified 20 different confirmed incidents and operations involving federal, state, and local government operatives who infiltrated the massive Trump crowds on January 6, 2021.

But we had no idea there were 274 FBI agents operating in the crowd that day.

On Thursday after this news broke on the hundreds of FBI operatives in the crowd that day, TGP pointed out that Chris Wray lied about this while under oath in front of Congress.

You can read more here.

BREAKING: CHRIS WRAY LIED UNDER OATH! FBI Had 274 Plainclothes Agents in the Crowd on January 6th – IT WAS A TOTAL FEDSURRECTION

On Saturday President Trump lashed out at Dirty former FBI Director Chris Wray and his lies to Congress about January 6.

President Trump: It was just revealed that the FBI had secretly placed, against all Rules, Regulations, Protocols, and Standards, 274 FBI Agents into the Crowd just prior to, and during, the January 6th Hoax. This is different from what Director Christopher Wray stated, over and over again! That’s right, as it now turns out, FBI Agents were at, and in, the January 6th Protest, probably acting as Agitators and Insurrectionists, but certainly not as “Law Enforcement Officials.” I want to know who each and every one of these so-called “Agents” are, and what they were up to on that now “Historic” Day. Many Great American Patriots were made to pay a very big price only for the love of their Country. I owe this investigation of “Dirty Cops and Crooked Politicians” to them! Christopher Wray, the then Director of the FBI, has some major explaining to do. That’s two in a row, Comey and Wray, who got caught LYING, with our Great Country at stake. WE CAN NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN TO AMERICA AGAIN!

And later today FBI Director Kash Patel also tweeted out that Chris Wray lied to Congress.

Wray said there were no FBI operatives there. Wray lied.

Kash says the FBI agents were on hand after the rioting started. That explanation strains credulity.

After all, it was a peaceful protest on January 6 until the police started firing rubber bullets and tossing sound grenades on the unsuspecting crowd.

Regardless, this new information this week ought to be enough to press charges against serial liar Chris Wray.

Patel went on to say Wray lied to Congress and the American people about what really happened.

It appears that Chris Wray was attempting to top Jim Comey as the worst and most dishonest FBI Chief in history.

Maybe Wray will be the next deep state hack to be indicted for their criminal actions during President Trump’s first term.

It won’t come as a surprise for The Gateway Pundit readers.

The post Is Wray Next?… Kash Patel Accuses Chris Wray of Lying to Congress about FBI Agents in the Crowd on January 6, 2021 – Calls Out His “Corrupt Leadership” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

German State Public Radio and TV Broadcaster NDR Suppresses Explosive Documentary Exposing OCCRP Election Meddling and Secret U.S. Funding

The OCCRP network that is funded by US taxpayers was used to attack EU-critical politicians as “Moscow agents” before the 2024 elections. OCCRP paid over  €600,000 to a partisan journalists’ network immediately following the EU elections. The organization also has ties to Soros.

Germany’s taxpayer-funded state broadcaster NDR is desperately trying to bury its own investigative documentary that exposes the shady journalist network OCCRP. The reason? The film caught OCCRP chief Drew Sullivan on camera bragging that his organization was “responsible for overthrowing five or six governments.”

The revelations are devastating. NDR reporters uncovered that OCCRP—whose media partners include Der Spiegeland Die Zeit—was secretly bankrolled from the United States for decades. When the documentary turned out to be critical instead of a love letter, Sullivan reportedly pressured NDR to kill the project. The state broadcaster complied, scrapping the documentary before it aired and cutting ties with OCCRP in 2023. The scandal finally leaked in December 2024 through the French platform Mediapart.

Censorship and Threats Against an Elected Official

Now, as OCCRP is embroiled in a massive EU funding scandal, the suppressed film has resurfaced. MEP Petr Bystron (AfD) revealed through an inquiry that OCCRP received €600,000 from EU coffers immediately after the European elections—right after the network ran smear campaigns against conservative candidates, including Bystron himself.

Despite this interference, Bystron won his seat and published the hidden film online. That’s when NDR struck back, issuing him a cease-and-desist order and threatening fines of up to €50,000. The state broadcaster appears terrified that Sullivan’s own words might reach the public.

OCCRP in Panic Mode

Sullivan and OCCRP reacted furiously on X, dismissing the leaked documentary as “attacks” on their organization. But Sullivan offered no explanation as to how quoting his own on-camera admissions could be an “attack.” OCCRP also dodged questions from the Berliner Zeitung about its EU payments, merely insisting it was still “independent.”

Sullivan’s radical views are also on display elsewhere. After the brutal murder of American conservative Charlie Kirk, the OCCRP boss gloated: “A moment of silence is not appropriate. He was no hero. […] He was a racist, an anti-democratic liar.”

U.S. Fallout

The scandal is reverberating across the Atlantic. President Donald Trump already cut OCCRP’s lifeline by halting its funding via USAID. And now, U.S. media like Gateway Pundit and InfoWars are exposing how this so-called “investigative” network has been weaponized to manipulate elections and topple governments worldwide.

 

The post German State Public Radio and TV Broadcaster NDR Suppresses Explosive Documentary Exposing OCCRP Election Meddling and Secret U.S. Funding appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Grand Jury INDICTS Three Women for STALKING ICE Agent and Livestreaming His Address

President Donald Trump holds a press conference with Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room on Friday, June 27, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Abe McNatt)

A federal grand jury has indicted three women accused of targeting a ICE agent in California, following him home from work and broadcasting his private information online. 

The case exposes the dangerous escalation of anti-ICE activism, where harassment and intimidation of law enforcement officers are now celebrated on social media.

According to the indictment, the three defendants—Ashleigh Brown, 38, of Aurora, Colorado; Cynthia Raygoza, 37, of Riverside, California; and Sandra Carmona Samane, 25, of Panorama City, California—face charges of conspiracy and illegally disclosing the personal information of a federal law enforcement officer. 

WATCH: Why The LEFT Has A VIOLENCE Issue

Prosecutors allege the women deliberately stalked the ICE agent on August 28, trailing him from his workplace in downtown Los Angeles all the way to his residence.

During the pursuit, prosecutors say, the women livestreamed the chase on Instagram. The streams were shared across multiple accounts with names such as “ice_out_of_la,” “defendmesoamericanculture,” and “corn_maiden_design.” 

By the end of the broadcast, the women had posted the agent’s home address online, essentially turning him and his family into targets.

This is not protest—it is criminal intimidation of a federal officer. 

The indictment reflects a growing problem: left-wing activists using digital platforms to expose and endanger law enforcement officers. 

The trend mirrors the tactics of extremist groups who claim to fight for “justice” but resort to doxing, harassment, and threats against those tasked with enforcing America’s immigration laws.

Federal prosecutors have made it clear that such behavior will not be tolerated. 

Publishing the personal address of a federal law enforcement officer is a felony, one intended to prevent exactly this type of reckless endangerment. 

The three women could face years in prison if convicted.

What makes this case especially disturbing is the celebratory nature of the livestreams.

Instead of simply protesting ICE policies through legal channels, the women weaponized social media to mobilize hostility against a single officer. 

Their actions did not just place him at risk—they endangered his entire household. 

For law enforcement agents who already face daily threats, this incident highlights the rising dangers of political extremism intersecting with online platforms.

The federal indictment underscores an urgent reality: targeting individual officers is not activism, it is lawlessness. 

If America allows the doxing and harassment of its law enforcement agents to go unpunished, no officer will feel safe carrying out their duty. 

In this case, the Department of Justice is signaling that crossing this line will bring serious consequences.

The post Grand Jury INDICTS Three Women for STALKING ICE Agent and Livestreaming His Address appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Signs Executive Order Rescuing TikTok in the U.S.: $14 Billion Sale to American Investors Like Oracle and Silver Lake

This is a Gateway Hispanic article.

The post Trump Signs Executive Order Rescuing TikTok in the U.S.: $14 Billion Sale to American Investors Like Oracle and Silver Lake appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Bill Gates Named in Epstein Files—Democrats Stay Silent

Tuesday on "The View," Bill Gates lamented the targeting of USAID by Elon Musk and the Trump administration, claiming it is needed to prevent "literally millions of deaths."

Tuesday on "The View," Bill Gates lamented the targeting of USAID by Elon Musk and the Trump administration, claiming it is needed to prevent "literally millions of deaths."
Tuesday on “The View,” Bill Gates lamented the targeting of USAID by Elon Musk and the Trump administration, claiming it is needed to prevent “literally millions of deaths.” (@TheView / X screen shot)

The latest release of Jeffrey Epstein’s files has renewed public scrutiny of high-profile figures who maintained relationships with the disgraced financier. 

Among them is billionaire Bill Gates, whose name has appeared in the documents. For years, Democrats and their media allies downplayed or outright ignored Gates’ connections to Epstein. 

Now, the facts reveal not only his ties to Epstein but also his deep involvement in Democrat Party politics.

WATCH: THE ATLANTIC Admits the LEFT has a VIOLENCE Problem

While Gates has long cultivated the image of a neutral philanthropist, records reveal a different story. In the 2024 election cycle, Gates quietly funneled $50 million to groups supporting Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign. 

This massive donation positioned him as one of the most prominent individual financial backers of the Democrat ticket. 

Despite the significance, the mainstream press rarely reported on it, preferring to highlight donations from conservative donors while dismissing Gates as merely a “tech philanthropist.”

Gates has become an essential figure for Democrats, both as a financial resource and as a cultural influencer. He controls foundations that spend billions on progressive causes, from climate activism to education reforms that align with Democrat priorities. 

His presence in the Epstein files, however, complicates this carefully managed narrative. 

If Gates were a Republican donor, the connection would likely dominate headlines and become a political issue for months. 

Instead, the media and Democrat strategists have chosen to obscure the details.

The connection between Gates and Epstein has long been a subject of controversy. Gates admitted to meeting with Epstein multiple times after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for sex crimes. 

At the time, Gates justified the meetings as philanthropy-related discussions. 

Emails that surfaced later shed light on Epstein’s real motives. Behind the scenes, he was looking for ways to connect himself with respected global figures.

One of his main targets was Bill Gates and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Epstein believed that if he could tie his name to such a widely admired organization, it would improve his public image.

He saw the foundation as a vehicle to gain credibility he lacked. The association would help him appear legitimate in elite circles where his reputation was already tainted.

For Democrats, this should be a political liability—primarily since their party leaders routinely lecture the public about transparency and accountability.

The reality is that Gates’s $50 million support for Kamala Harris in 2024 solidified his role as a key Democrat player. 

By refusing to acknowledge his name in the Epstein files, Democrats are protecting one of their most powerful donors. 

When conservatives are tied to Epstein—even through casual meetings—the coverage is relentless. But when it comes to Gates, silence prevails.

The American people deserve the same transparency applied to Gates that the media demands from Republican donors. 

Until then, the Epstein files will remain a reminder of selective outrage and partisan double standards.

The post Bill Gates Named in Epstein Files—Democrats Stay Silent appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Cartooning Around

Cartooning Around

My childhood dream, like the popularity of print newspapers, inevitably faded.

Longmont,,Co,Usa,-,April,9,,2023:,Reading,The,Comics

There are very few times in life when a sentence written in the first person can be opened with the words “Like Flannery O’Connor,” but this is one of them: Like Flannery O’Connor, I was a cartoonist before I was a writer.

Because my professional life has become crowded with other titles—film critic, book reviewer, classical-music and dance columnist, arts reporter, and, Heaven help me, ersatz political commentator—I myself sometimes forget that my original dream job was daily newspaper cartoonist. 

I settled on this goal early and pursued it ardently.  

I had long been bewitched by the comics pages folded into each edition of the Times-Picayune, the newspaper with which I grew up in my suburb of New Orleans. The pages stood out because of the implicit respect they accorded their seemingly inconsequential inhabitants, including Charlie Brown, Garfield, and Mr. and Mrs. Bumstead. The comics were printed large enough for an attentive reader to discern their artistry; they were also run in sufficient numbers—dozens of strips and panels spread over multiple broadsheet pages—to suggest that each had a fan base. Indeed, I can remember few events more noteworthy in the life of any newspaper I faithfully read than when a cartoon was canceled or replaced. 

By the age of 8, I had become sufficiently enamored with what I knew of the cartoonist’s life to make the informed decision that I wished to make it my own. Undoubtedly, the apparent ease of this assignment made it appealing when compared to a real job—one that, for example, required leaving the house or, in fact, my desk—or even real writing. My short stories seldom filled more than a page-and-half in my ruled journal, but my cartoons would not require even that much creativity. To write and draw a daily comic strip—four, maybe five panels topped by a punchline—seemed accomplishable. Cartooning was not only an agreeable gig, I reckoned, but a secure one: I could not, in the very early 1990s, foresee a time when newspapers would cease being permanent features of American life. 

Quickly, Garry Trudeau’s Doonesbury made an unlikely claim on my imagination. Much of its humor—about commune-residing, marijuana-smoking permanent collegians and, later, angst-ridden, Reagan Revolution-hating yuppies—would have been completely lost on me back then. Yet, precocious kid that I was, I picked up on some of its topical humor, which I appreciated for its patina of sophistication rather than its particulars. I was surely the only second-grader in my class who, when asked to draw a picture of the cover of a recently read book, drew a near-perfect replica of the cover of a Doonesbury anthology that had a place of honor in my collection, Check Your Egos at the Door

Although I now wince at his reflexive liberalism and lame anti-Trumpism, I cannot deny that Trudeau was legitimately my hero. Although I got my hands on each new Doonesbury anthology as it appeared at the local B. Dalton, I nonetheless took my scissors to the newspaper to clip each strip for preservation in albums intended for family photos. (I later read that John Updike, another cartoonist-turned-writer, did the same thing.)

When I was perhaps 10, I remember reading about a cartoonists’ conference in New Orleans in which, apparently erroneously, Trudeau was named as one of the participants. My parents drove me to the downtown hotel where the event was taking place, and while there were lots of cartoonists happily chatting with fans, Trudeau was absent. I managed to get the attention of one cartoonist—I wish I could remember who—and he told me that, no, he didn’t think “Garry,” as he called him, was there. Strangely, I counted this encounter as a success: I had met someone in my future field who seemed to know “Garry”! That Trudeau was married to the former Today Show co-host Jane Pauley only contributed to my impression that an exciting, glamorous life could be wrung from a trade as juvenile-seeming as cartooning. I am sure I imagined a future for myself in which I scribbled away while my wife appeared on TV or maybe in the movies. 

Later, my father prevailed upon a Doonesbury merchandising outfit to forward my cartoons to Trudeau in New York. Unbelievably, Trudeau wrote me an unsolicited typewritten note graciously praising my primitive, imitative but earnest work. This letter, typed on Doonesbury stationary and bearing what was, for me, its writer’s inimitable signature, arrived at my father’s office, and he called me at home to give me the news—undoubtedly interrupting one of my cartooning sessions in a spare bedroom that had been converted into a “studio,” complete with an angled drawing table and a T-square. Much to his credit, Trudeau would answer all of my subsequent fan mail.

As far as I can remember, a cartoon of mine was published just once, in my school’s student magazine, but for years I continued to churn out my comics as though they had a destination and I had a deadline. When I began to be homeschooled in the third grade, I lost an automatic outlet—that student magazine was, obviously, no longer available to me—but I gained oodles of time to doodle. At age 12, I was featured on the front page of my hometown newspaper, the now-defunct Slidell Sentry-News—the unintended outcome of my having submitted my portfolio in the hope of winning a regular spot on their comics page. I had to settle for a long and flattering profile with the headline KID CARTOONIST—“settle,” because the profile was a one-time event, not a recurring presence in the funny pages. 

Reading the story again today, I am not convinced that I was as busy as I had claimed—evidently, I had said that I drew five strips per week, each taking two hours—but I had worked long and hard enough for my cartoons to clearly resemble a Doonesbury knockoff. The reporter who interviewed me described my efforts in the most charitable manner possible: “Trudeau’s influence on the strips is instantly obvious. Tonguette uses many of the same techniques: disembodied icons to represent people, a dedicated stock of adult, college-educated characters, and a sharp, insightful wit.”

This is much too generous, but I won’t deny that, just as Trudeau had his preferred satirical targets, such as Bush and Quayle, I had mine: Martha Stewart, whose maniacal commitment to home economics struck me as very comic strip-worthy. 

Yet after the newspaper profile appeared, my interest in my vocation, chosen so confidently at eight, waned. I was probably disappointed that no syndicate called to pick up my work, and I know I was discouraged when a friend of my brother, upon looking over the article, seemed decidedly unimpressed when I explained that, no, I was not the sort of cartoonist who worked in animated cartoons.

For me, it was onto other enthusiasms—the films of Orson Welles, the novels of Kurt Vonnegut, the reviews of John Simon. In many ways, I have attained the easy way of life I had hoped for. I have ended up parked at my desk in much the manner I predicted, and producing 800 words a day is not really so much more arduous than dreaming up a gag at the conclusion of a couple of panels. Plus, my career has occasionally brought me into contact with the dreams of my youth. I have reviewed exhibitions of original comics art and crossed paths with a hero or two, including Jules Feiffer, whom I interviewed for a 2020 profile in the Christian Science Monitor. Once I fully grasped Doonesbury’s politics, I ended up largely not sharing them, but I now see that Trudeau got some things right, including his opposition to the Iraq War and scorn for the president who initiated that woebegone conflict. 

Things worked out, but it saddens me when I read what my father told the reporter about my seemingly indefatigable cartooning so many years ago. “He just does it all on his own,” my dad said. “We as parents don’t do anything but encourage him. . . . It isn’t something that’s a passing fancy.” Alas, it turned out to be just that—an 8-year-old’s dream of adult life that was as susceptible to fading as newsprint. My cartooning ended before its time, but don’t all things?

The post Cartooning Around appeared first on The American Conservative.

Dear Fellow Boomers, Rethink Your Support for Israel

Dear Fellow Boomers, Rethink Your Support for Israel

What will you tell your grandchildren?

ANTI-AIPAC Protest In Washington, D.C.

Credit: NurPhoto/Getty Images

The White House and Congress are scheming to send another $6.4 billion worth of armaments to the Israeli war machine. They will have to pretend it is a sale to sneak it through, hiding it in non-appropriation legislation, though American taxpayers will finance the transaction. 

Note to members of our geriatric Congress: Before you vote for this package and further enable the genocide in Gaza, think about how you are going to explain your vote to your grandchildren. 

All American grandparents, in fact, should reflect on the brutality that the U.S. is enabling in Gaza. Among Americans, conservative Boomers increasingly stand alone in their steadfast support for Israel—and all signs suggest their grandchildren won’t be able to forgive them for it.

Don’t forget, on September 16, 2025 the United Nations Human Rights Commission concluded, after more than a two-year investigation, that Israel has committed genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. You will not be able to plausibly pretend you had no way of knowing.

What will you tell your grandchildren? As they grow up, they will be fully aware of the atrocities and suffering of the Gaza Holocaust. They are already aware, more so than you, perhaps. The pro-Israel propaganda machine has lost its grip on your grandchildren’s generation.

And if you have young grandchildren, think of the many children their age starving and dying in Gaza.

If you’re unwilling to drop your support for Israel and its genocide in Gaza, then you better prepare for future conversations with the grandkids. Here are some suggested talking points for my fellow Boomers who just can’t quit Israel:

You thought Hamas was stealing all the food aid and getting fat while their fellow Palestinians were starving. As for why you thought this, well, the Israeli government said so.

Israel is our greatest ally. (That story is collapsing faster than a cardboard cabin in a hurricane.)

Somehow you were convinced that the Gazans—armed with small arms, rocks, and hang gliders—were a threat to U.S. national security.

As for those pro-Israel Boomers in Congress, you can add the following:

You needed donations and elite support to be reelected, and you received much better press and more money for being Israel First than America First.

Indeed, not supporting the weapons transfer would have resulted in pro-Israel billionaires spending millions to defeat you in a primary. And you absolutely needed to hold onto power. (Warning: The grandkids might ask what the point of staying in power was—and whether you were as powerful as you thought.)

You were afraid of being called names and threatened.

You really liked the fancy fundraisers in Palm Beach.

If all the above fails, you could fall back on a tried-and-true old chestnut of Christian Zionists:

When you were very young, in Sunday school you heard about some Old Testament passages which allowed one to completely dismiss the teachings of Jesus Christ when it came to slaughtering the enemies of a certain secular government.

Pro tip: Your grandchildren will probably find the power-and-money excuses more credible.

Good luck!

The post Dear Fellow Boomers, Rethink Your Support for Israel appeared first on The American Conservative.