COUNT ONE: Knowingly and willfully make a threat to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States;
COUNT TWO: knowingly and willfully did transmit in interstate and foreign commerce a communication that contained a threat to kill the President, Donald J. Trump
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel and US Attorney Ellis Boyle delivered remarks on the two-count indictment returned by the grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Blanche made it clear: “You are not allowed to threaten the President of the United States of America.”
Comey lashed out at the Trump Administration in a video message posted to his Substack.
“Well.. they’re back,” Comey said.
“This time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago. And this won’t be the end of it. Nothing has changed with me. I’m still innocent,” he said.
Republicans took a bold stand against the radical left’s sacred cow: the so-called Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. The hearing exposed how the Biden DOJ weaponized this law as a club to smash pro-life Americans while turning a blind eye to violent attacks on pregnancy resource centers and churches.
Freshman Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) delivered one of the most uncomfortable moments for the abortion lobby in recent memory.
Gill directly confronted Jessica Waters, Assistant Professor of Justice, Law & Criminology and a vocal advocate for abortion access, asking which BARBARIC abortion method she preferred.
When she declined to answer directly, Gill proceeded to list and describe several procedures, including suction abortion, dilation and curettage, dilation and evacuation, and saline injection, pressing her to explain which method she considered acceptable.
Instead of addressing the barbarism, Waters pivoted to tired talking points about the “FACE Act” and “reproductive health care access.”
Here is the devastating back-and-forth:
Brandon Gill: You’re an advocate for abortion policy. What’s your favorite type of abortion?
Jessica Waters: I am an advocate for patients having access to the full realm of reproductive health care.
Brandon Gill: But do you have a preferred method of abortion that you like?
Jessica Waters: I do not.
Brandon Gill: Let me read through a couple different methods, and I want to get your take on how much you like these. The first type is called a suction abortion. This is when the cervix is dilated, and a strong suction, 29 times the power of a household vacuum cleaner, tears the baby’s body apart and sucks it through the hose into a container. Do you prefer that method?
Jessica Waters: I stand by my former testimony.
Brandon Gill: That sounds kind of gross, doesn’t it? Sounds pretty gruesome. Do you agree? It does to me.
Jessica Waters: I stand by how I answered your question fully and accurately.
Brandon Gill: Okay, what about this one? This one is called dilation and curettage. After dilation of the cervix, a sharp looped knife is inserted into the uterus. The baby’s body is cut into pieces and extracted, often by suction. Do you prefer that method?
Jessica Waters:What I believe we are here to talk about today is the FACE Act. We are not here to talk about—
Brandon Gill: I’m asking you. You’re a pro-abortion advocate. I’m asking if you prefer the dilation and curettage method.
Jessica Waters: I am an access to reproductive health care advocate.
Brandon Gill: You don’t want to talk about abortion itself. Why is that?
Jessica Waters: I would prefer to talk about the reason that the committee called the hearing.
Brandon Gill: Is it because it’s uncomfortable to talk about?
Jessica Waters: I would prefer—
Brandon Gill: It should be uncomfortable.
Jessica Waters: I would prefer, if you would let me finish my statement, to talk about the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which is what I was asked to come here and talk about.
Brandon Gill: How about this one? It’s called dilation and evacuation. Forceps are inserted into the uterus, grabbing and twisting the baby’s body to dismember him or her. If the head is too large, it must be crushed in order to remove it. Do you prefer that method?
Jessica Waters: I would prefer to talk about the reason the hearing was called and the basis of my expert testimony.
Brandon Gill: It’s uncomfortable to hear this, isn’t it? It is. I think it is because it’s barbaric and evil. How about this one? It’s called the saline injection. It’s when a 20% salt solution is injected through the mother’s abdomen into the baby’s amniotic fluid. The baby’s skin is burned off. The baby ingests the solution and dies of salt poisoning, dehydration, and hemorrhaging of the brain. Do you prefer that method?
Jessica Waters: I would prefer to talk about the subject of the hearing.
Brandon Gill: This is the subject of the hearing. This is about protests outside of abortion clinics. I’m asking you about abortion.
Jessica Waters: I stand by my prior testimony.
Brandon Gill: Okay. I wouldn’t want to talk about this either if I were you, because it is barbaric and evil.
WATCH:
I described some of the most common methods of abortion to one of the abortion industry’s top legal scholars.
There have been at least five assassination attempts on the life of President Trump since his 2016 campaign. Media framing him as a Nazi and a threat to democracy has emboldened the left to call for and engage in political violence. Photo courtesy of James Skoufis.
The April 25, 2026 attack at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner was the fifth documented attempt against President Donald Trump in less than a decade. The first, largely forgotten by the media, came in 2016, when Michael Steven Sandford attempted to seize an officer’s weapon at a Trump rally in Las Vegas.
The most widely remembered was Thomas Matthew Crooks opening fire at the Butler, Pennsylvania rally on July 13, 2024, killing one rallygoer and grazing Trump’s ear, producing the iconic photograph of Trump raising his fist and shouting “Fight, fight, fight.” Between the fourth and fifth attempts on the president’s life, conservative Christian commentator Charlie Kirk was assassinated while engaging students in open dialogue on a university campus.
The media enabled violence against both men through sustained false framing. Trump was portrayed for years as a Russian asset and a threat to democracy. Using out-of-context quotes and selective framing, the media painted Kirk as a racist and a homophobe. Some on the left called for the deaths of both men and celebrated when Kirk was killed.
The media campaign against Trump began before his first election. On September 23, 2016, reports surfaced that U.S. authorities were investigating Trump campaign figure Carter Page for possible ties to Russian influence operations. This was the first public story directly linking a Trump associate to Russia. Fusion GPS, the opposition-research firm hired by the Clinton campaign, had directed Christopher Steele to share his findings with the media as early as mid-September 2016, weeks before the election.
On October 7, 2016, DHS and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper issued a public statement attributing the hacking of Democratic officials and the WikiLeaks releases to Russian intelligence acting to benefit Trump. On January 10, 2017, BuzzFeed published the Steele dossier in full, the same day Jeff Sessions’s confirmation hearing began, triggering wall-to-wall media saturation of the Russia narrative. The FBI’s own investigation, Crossfire Hurricane, had been formally opened on July 31, 2016, though the Durham Report later concluded it lacked an adequate factual basis.
The Russia narrative, the claim that Trump was a foreign-installed puppet being blackmailed by Vladimir Putin, ran for Trump’s entire first term and shaped two impeachment proceedings. The Mueller Report found no evidence of criminal conspiracy. The Durham Report concluded the FBI launched its investigation without an adequate factual basis and applied a double standard not applied to the Clinton campaign. The narrative collapsed only after nearly three years of continuous coverage built on material that, as Durham confirmed, lacked a factual foundation from the start.
Despite Russiagate collapsing, the media still runs with it from time to time, ostensibly on slow news days. However, Trump’s second term has been more acutely shaped by media framing him as a tyrant and a threat to democracy. The Intercept ran a 2024 piece arguing Trump “represents an existential threat to democracy” and that the warning “must be repeated, over and over again.” NPR aired a segment in which a political scientist argued the press had an “obligation” to cover Trump as a threat to democracy in the same way it covers climate change, with no opposing view presented.
The April 25, 2026 Correspondents’ Dinner shooter, Cole Allen, left social media posts comparing Trump to Adolf Hitler and encouraging others to buy guns. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s statement after the shooting was precise: “Those who constantly, falsely label and slander the president as a fascist and a threat to democracy and compare him to Hitler to score political points are fueling this kind of violence.”
A documented series of celebrity statements explicitly invoked Trump’s assassination or injury, with minimal institutional consequence. In May 2017, Kathy Griffin posed holding a bloodied, severed head styled to resemble Trump; CNN fired her, but she reposted the image after his 2023 indictment. At the January 2017 Women’s March, Madonna said she had “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.” At the 2017 Glastonbury Festival, Johnny Depp asked the crowd, “When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?” and added, “Maybe it’s time.”
In March 2017, Snoop Dogg released a music video depicting him shooting a prop gun at a Trump-lookalike clown called “Ronald Klump.” In June 2017, the New York Public Theater staged Julius Caesar with the lead dressed as Trump, stabbed to death onstage nightly. Days before the April 25, 2026 attack, Jimmy Kimmel joked that Melania had “a glow like an expectant widow.” Trump called for his firing; Melania called it “hateful and violent rhetoric.” When conservatives made comparable statements about Obama-era figures, prosecutions and firings followed. Most of these incidents produced only brief apologies.
The media framing of January 6 as a violent coup attempt orchestrated by Trump became foundational to the “existential threat” narrative. The White House has noted that the House Select Committee’s report “violated House rules, deleted documents in the final days of the 117th Congress, and had a predetermined, partisan outcome.” Trump was acquitted in his second Senate impeachment trial, and no court found him criminally liable for the events.
The claim that he “incited an insurrection,” repeated as a settled fact across countless news cycles, was legally contested and never proven in court, yet it was used continuously to brand him as someone who had already attempted to overthrow the U.S. government, making further violence easier to rationalize.
Democratic politicians contributed directly to the incitement environment. Joe Biden said in 2016, “If we were in high school, I could take him behind the gym,” a remark he later repeated more explicitly, saying, “I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him.” Nancy Pelosi said in June 2018, “I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country. And maybe there will be,” and on another occasion, “You’ve got to be ready to take a punch. You’ve got to be ready to throw a punch.”
Hakeem Jeffries called on people to “fight” the Trump administration “in the streets.” In 2018, Rep. Maxine Waters told supporters to confront Trump cabinet members in restaurants, gas stations, and department stores and “tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
The sustained characterization of Trump as a white supremacist by mainstream outlets, academics, and politicians altered the moral permission structure for violence against him. The Charlottesville “both sides” misquote is the clearest example: Trump’s full statement condemned neo-Nazis explicitly, but the selective clip, “very fine people on both sides,” was presented for years as evidence of white supremacy by major outlets and repeated by Biden as a cornerstone of his 2020 campaign, even after multiple fact-checkers noted the misrepresentation. The same pattern of selective framing applied to Kirk.
When a political figure is credibly labeled a white supremacist or a racist by mainstream institutions, the framework that inhibits violence against him erodes.
Former Deputy Director of the FBI Dan Bongino joined Sean Hannity’s podcast, Hanging Out with Me, and discussed his time at the FBI, his cancer diagnosis, the Russia hoax, UFOs, government secrets, and more.
As for his time in the FBI, Bongino noted, “We walked into a mess. You had like, level A problems, which were like…you had to fix this right away or something’s going to go boom.”
“Then you had level B and level C. D, E, and F got handled by someone else and, you know, people out in the field and up into the DAD level. If it made it to your desk, it was like an A, B, or C problem….C is a pretty big deal.”
“But the problem is, as you’re dealing with those problems every day in the FBI, there were two FBIs trying to help you solve the A, B, and C problems, and that’s FBI 1 and FBI 2. Like, there’s two FBIs? Yes, there were two FBIs.”
“There was the FBI of like bust your ass. You know, VCAC agents, Violent Crimes Against Children, white collar agents, Violent Crime Fugitive Task Force. And some of these guys, I was just honored to be in the room. They were like, we have this TFO, Task Force Officer, down in Miami. This guy, uh, his first name’s Joe, I won’t say his last name, obviously.”
“This guy’s been on the job 38 years. You know how many violent criminals are off the street because of this guy and the agents he works with? I mean, he’s a TFO, but the agents were like that too.”
“And then you had this other FBI which were— which was populated with, to say, unfortunately, snakes is being nice.”
“And here’s the problem, Sean, it wasn’t always obvious which FBI they were in.”
“So you’re trying to solve, like, a level A problem, which has like no solution. There’s a shitty solution and a shittier one, and I gotta tell ya, it’s almost like a coin toss because either way, someone’s gonna get hurt, okay. And you’re trying to figure this out and you’re asking someone for advice….you’ve only been there a couple weeks…and you don’t know if that person is part of the good FBI or the bad FBI.”
“So it took Kash and I both, and even people we had relied on on the outside, who knew the FBI well, sometimes they would get it wrong too. It happened a couple times where they’d say, ‘Oh, you can trust John Smith.’ And you trust John Smith, and then a week later you’d see, like, a leak in the media and you’d be like, ‘I’m pretty sure that came from John Smith.’”
“So I would start like messing with people…I would do these things…like a report leaked out in the media one day. I knew exactly where it came from because I made it up, it was a total lie. It was just an innocuous story.”
“I set somebody up. It was about my schedule after I was going to leave where I am…I’m like ‘Yeah, I’m going out….I forget what I said….but I’m going out to Fleming Steak House tonight.’”
“I wasn’t going out to Fleming’s; I was traveling back to Florida. I knew I was the only….and I confronted him on it. I knew who it was….we had to play this little game.”
“So we walked into this total shitshow, this Biden mess, you know, illegals everywhere. The FBI focused on locking up Donald Trump and not bad guys.
Hats off to this reporter for asking the elephant in the room.
On Tuesday afternoon, Sen. Chuck Schumer held a press conference, taking aim at President Trump’s new ballroom and blaming Republicans for the failure to pass a new DHS spending bill.
Schumer attended the press conference with a noticeably large bandage on his forehead, prompting one reporter to ask what had happened to it.
In response to the reporter’s question, Schumer shared that a “closet door was opened late at night and it met my forehead.”
Schumer, after answering the question, went on a rant regarding President Trump’s ballroom and stated, “We don’t need this ballroom; you want to help national security, the ballroom has nothing to do with it. Help national security by funding DHS.”
The Senator from New York added, “We don’t want to fund it, we don’t want to approve it, it is not necessary, it’s typical of what’s wrong with Donald Trump, focusing on the wrong things that appease his ego.”
Today, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) spoke on the Senate floor on President Trump and Republicans’ skewed priorities to use taxpayer money to fund Trump’s gold-plated ballroom instead of passing the twice-Senate-approved bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security and addressing the issues the American people are facing. Below are Senator Schumer’s remarks, which can also be viewed here.
As our nation wages Donald Trump’s reckless war with a dangerous and erratic enemy, and as the Department of Homeland Security is still not funded because of the hijinks within the president’s own party, Donald Trump has decided to focus on a taxpayer-funded, gold-plated ballroom instead of focusing on these important national security issues. The war in Iran, dangerous for the US. The fact that we haven’t funded Homeland Security, dangerous for the U.S. Does Donald Trump roll up his sleeves and solve these problems? No. He’s focused on this ballroom. His gilded, gold-plated, taxpayer-funded ballroom, instead of focusing on the important national security issues facing the country. Trump’s values are perverse. Just perverse.
If the President and House Republicans truly care about our national security, fund DHS. Fund the Secret Service. Fund CISA. Fund the Coast Guard. Fund all the crucial law-abiding agencies that every Democrat and every Republican in the Senate unanimously voted to fund not once but twice. Now House Republicans say they are tinkering with technical changes to our legislation. Speaker Johnson, our bill, our bipartisan bill, doesn’t need any changes – just pass the damn thing. Pass the damn thing. We desperately need it.
Schumer’s comments come just days after 31-year-old Cole Allen allegedly opened fire inside the Washington Hilton Hotel during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
The Trump administration and House Republicans have defended the ballroom plans, arguing that incidents like the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner highlight the need for a venue capable of accommodating large crowds.
The Department of Justice indicted Dr. David M. Morens, longtime senior advisor to Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), on felony charges on Tuesday, including conspiracy against the United States; destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations; concealment, removal, or mutilation of records; and aiding and abetting.
Morens, 78, allegedly helped orchestrate a scheme to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests during the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to the Department of Justice, Morens and his co-conspirators used his personal Gmail account to hide communications about restoring NIH funding to EcoHealth Alliance’s controversial bat coronavirus grant, the same grant tied to the Wuhan Institute of Virology that was terminated over lab-leak concerns.
They also worked to push the “natural origins” narrative and suppress alternative theories.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche called it “a profound abuse of trust” at the height of the pandemic.
FBI Director Kash Patel vowed the FBI “will not stop until you face justice.”
The taxpayer watchdog group White Coat Waste Project (WCW), which first exposed NIH’s gain-of-function funding in Wuhan and the infamous “Beaglegate” dog experiments, applauded the indictment but warned that Morens was not acting alone.
The organization also has the evidence to back it up.
In a blistering statement provided to The Gateway Pundit, WCW Senior Vice President Justin Goodman said:
“White Coat Waste was the first to uncover, document, and expose NIH’s reckless funding for gain-of-function in Wuhan and beagle testing worldwide—two of the NIH’s biggest scandals—White Coat Waste applauds Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and President Trump for holding Fauci henchman David Morens accountable.
But Morens wasn’t a lone wolf, and other lab leak cover-up lackeys are still in government raking in taxpayer-funded salaries.
White Coat Waste uncovered evidence that other Fauci-era officials still at the NIH conspired with EcoHealth Alliance to violate a federal ban on gain-of-function and fund the dangerous animal tests in Wuhan that probably caused COVID. RFK Jr.’s NIH has also promoted Morens collaborator and gain-of-function cheerleader Jeffery Taubenberger to replace Fauci—even though he tried to reinstate the disastrous NIH grant that funded the Wuhan lab after WCW exposed it and President Trump cut it and he co-authored propaganda with Morens stating that a lab leak was ‘thoroughly discredited.’ We’ve been saying for over a year that the Trump administration needs to clean house at NIH to remove Fauci’s fingerprints.
White Coat Waste has also obtained key evidence showing that Fauci evaded FOIA by using his personal Gmail to talk about Beaglegate with the Washington Post and that he repeatedly misled Congress by claiming he didn’t fund gain-of-function in Wuhan. Those are serious crimes that could carry hefty fines and jail time if Fauci’s pardon is voided.
Morens’ indictment should be the beginning—not the end—of long-overdue lab leak accountability at NIH.”
WATCH:
MORENS INDICTED: “This is the beginning of lab leak coverup accountability.”@JustinRGoodman of @WhiteCoatWaste says @TheJusticeDept indictment of David Morens, a former top Fauci adviser, is only “the tip of the iceberg.”
White Coat Waste is calling for a full house-cleaning at NIH, additional arrests of remaining co-conspirators, reversal of promotions like Taubenberger’s, and for President Trump to immediately review and overturn any pardon granted to Anthony Fauci so he can finally face justice.
We have been reporting here on TGP about the ongoing ecological disaster involving escaped hippopotamuses in the South American rivers of Colombia, and the response by the authorities.
While a plan is being put in place to cull these dangerous, invading beasts wreaking havoc in the local ecosystem, they may be about to be saved.
From four to nearly 200, Colombia’s “cocaine hippos” have been damaging the ecosystem of the Magdalena River for over four decades. https://t.co/vDLlNcgzDJ
“An Indian billionaire’s son has offered to provide a new home for the feral hippos introduced to Colombia by Pablo Escobar, the late drug lord.
Anant Ambani, the youngest son of Asia’s richest man, has told the Colombian government to reverse its decision to cull 80 of the animals that have been wreaking havoc on rivers in the country. ‘These 80 hippos did not choose where they were born, nor did they create the circumstances they now face’, Mr. Ambani said.”
An Indian billionaire’s son offered on Tuesday to take hippos descended from those introduced to Colombia by drug kingpin Pablo Escobar, rather than have the animals killed.https://t.co/gZo3xOYk7R
Colombian officials have approved the plan to kill (or ‘cull’) the 80 animals, since the government ‘had exhausted all other options to control their numbers’.
“Colombia is the only country outside Africa with a hippo population living wild, after Escobar, the founder of the Medellín cartel, imported four of the large mammals for a private zoo on his ranch.
After his death in 1993 at 44, the animals made a new life on river banks, procreating quickly. They have attacked fishermen and displaced native species.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries Speaker Mike Johnson
A new national survey suggests the battle for Congress remains wide open, with Republicans and Democrats deadlocked heading into the 2026 midterms.
The Harvard CAPS/HarrisX poll, conducted April 23 to 26 among 2,745 registered voters, found 50 percent support for each party on the generic congressional ballot.
The survey carries a margin of error of 1.87 percent.
Voter engagement shows a slight Republican edge.
Among GOP respondents, 62 percent said they will definitely vote, compared to 59 percent of Democrats.
Another 18 percent of Republicans said they would probably vote, versus 17 percent of Democrats.
Independent voters lean slightly Democratic, breaking 52 percent to 48 percent, though overall turnout among independents trails both major parties.
On presidential performance, voters are evenly divided. Half say President Donald Trump is doing better than Joe Biden, while half say worse.
Trump’s overall approval rating stands at 42 percent approve, and 53 percent disapprove, improving to 46 percent approve and 51 percent disapprove among likely midterm voters.
Economic concerns remain the priority of most Americans. Inflation and affordability rank as the top issues for 35 percent of voters, followed by the economy and jobs at 28 percent.
Immigration registers at 24 percent, health care at 22 percent, the U.S.-Iran conflict at 20 percent, and corruption at 18 percent.
The results cast doubt on the idea that Democrats are cruising towards a so-called “blue wave” in November.
Some polls, such as Quinnipac, show Democrats up by as much as 11 percent, while Rasmussen and Morning Consult have them up by just three percent.
The Harvard poll also found Kamala Harris as the current frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in 2028, trailed by Gavin Newsom at 22 percent and Josh Shapiro at 9 percent.
Meanwhile, Vice President J.D. Vance remains way out in front on the Republican side, with 48 percent support.
An arrest warrant was issued for former FBI Director James Comey after he was indicted by a grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina related to his Trump assassination post on Instagram.
The US Marshals were asked to provide Comey with the indictment and they issued an arrest warrant.
COUNT ONE: Knowingly and willfully make a threat to take the life of, and to inflict bodily harm upon, the President of the United States;
COUNT TWO: knowingly and willfully did transmit in interstate and foreign commerce a communication that contained a threat to kill the President, Donald J. Trump
Last May, James Comey called for President Trump to be killed in a cryptic Instagram post.
“Cool shell formation on my beach walk,” Comey said in his caption in May 2025.
Comey Trump assassination social media post (Screenshot via @Comey on X)
James Comey deleted the Instagram post and threw his wife under the bus during appearances on left-wing media outlets.
Comey previously peddled a BS story explaining how he just stumbled upon a curious formation of shells as he was walking down the beach with his wife.
“We were walking on the beach, we went to the beach to prepare for this week… and we were walking back towards the road and we saw in the sand someone had arranged shells with numbers. And Patrice, my wife, said, ‘why would someone put an address in the sand?’ and I said, ‘I don’t know’ and we stood over and I said, ‘I think it’s some kind of political message,’” Comey said.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, FBI Director Kash Patel and US Attorney Ellis Boyle delivered remarks on the two-count indictment returned by the grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Blanche made it clear: “You are not allowed to threaten the President of the United States of America.”
Todd Blanche said he is not sure if Comey has already been taken into custody.
(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits Gateway Pundit. We appreciate your support!)
Gun owners, does this sound familiar?
The car is FINALLY packed and you’re hitting the road.
But then “IT” hits you:
You’re armed… but you’re not sure about the gun laws where you’re going.
Vacation, road trips, and visiting family is supposed to be RELAXING.
You’re a law-abiding citizen. You just want to protect yourself and your loved ones.
But that doesn’t mean you have all the laws memorized.
And if you break one…
Local officials won’t have a problem slapping you with a fine or a set of handcuffs.
And maybe taking your gun.
That’s why you need this 100% FREE Gun Law map that has just been made available to every US gun owner.
If you ever cross state lines, you NEED to get this 100% FREE Gun Law map that’s now available to the public.
This interactive map allows you to quickly see the laws in your state or ANY state you plan to visit. It’s constantly updated to reflect changes in gun laws across the country.
You can save you from getting arrested for breaking a law you didn’t even KNOW about.
And more importantly, you’ll be able to actually ENJOY traveling like you were meant to.
MORENS INDICTED: “This is the beginning of lab leak coverup accountability.”
2026 Generic Congressional Ballot
Republicans: 50% [+1]
Democrats: 50% [-1]
Harris: 50% (+9)
Other: 6%
Vance: 48% (+6)
