New Reports Detail ‘Multiple Young Men’ Allegedly Drugged and Raped by ‘Super Predators’ on Jeffrey Epstein’s New Mexico ‘Zorro Ranch’ (VIDEOS)

Image of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell with a view of Epstein's estate, highlighting their controversial connection and the surrounding landscape.

Image of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell with a view of Epstein's estate, highlighting their controversial connection and the surrounding landscape.
AI-Generated image by Grok – Epstein and Maxwell around Zorro Ranch

Deep in the New Mexico desert allegedly lie some of the most gruesome secrets of the Jeffrey Epstein trafficking ring.

New allegations that ‘multiple young men’ were drugged and raped at Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch have come to light, adding to horrifying accusations ranging from murder to ‘baby factories’ at the pedophile’s ‘house of horrors’.

These allegations have surfaced in a documentary by ‘60 Minutes Australia’, and were initially reported by The Sun, but have now been picked up by multiple outlets from both sides of the Atlantic.

The New York Post reported:

“’A man actually claims that he met Jeffrey Epstein [and] was brought to the ranch, he was drugged’, US Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) told ‘60 Minutes Australia’ in a Sunday segment, the Sun reported.

‘He describes in detail a scene in which multiple young men were raped at the ranch in front of him after he was drugged’, said Stansbury, a leading advocate for Epstein victims. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were serial abusers, they really were super predators, and it was just how they lived their lives.”

Now that New Mexico has reopened its investigation into alleged child sex trafficking at the ranch, new details are emerging.

Reuters reported:

“Maria Jose Rodriguez Cadiz, who heads Solace Sexual Assault Services in Santa Fe, the only such support center in the region, told Reuters in an interview that in 2019, the year Epstein was arrested and then found dead in a jail cell, around 45 people approached the center to seek information, therapy and other services in ​relation to alleged sexual abuse ​at the ranch.

She estimated that ⁠between a quarter and a half of those contacts were from women who said they had been abused at the ranch – although she added that the center did not keep detailed records.

‘Dozens ​of people who were in need of information or direct services related to the Epstein-ring ​sex trafficking crimes ⁠were coming forward’, Rodriguez Cadiz said.”

Read more:

Bill Clinton Asked About Salacious Hot Tub Photo During Epstein Deposition (VIDEO)

The post New Reports Detail ‘Multiple Young Men’ Allegedly Drugged and Raped by ‘Super Predators’ on Jeffrey Epstein’s New Mexico ‘Zorro Ranch’ (VIDEOS) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WATCH: Dem Congressional Candidate Who Wants to Abolish ICE Completely MALFUNCTIONS on Live TV After Being Asked a Simple Question

Woman with braided hair wearing a green dress looks thoughtfully upward against a blue background during a television interview.

Woman with braided hair wearing a green dress looks thoughtfully upward against a blue background during a television interview.
Democrat congressional candidate Ala Stanford. Credit: NBC 10 Philadelphia YouTube screenshot

A far-left Democrat congressional candidate in Pennsylvania humiliated herself on live television last week after being asked a basic question about immigration enforcement.

On Friday, Dr. Ala Stanford sat down for a one-on-one interview with NBC 10 Philadelphia’s Lauren Mayk to discuss her candidacy for Pennsylvania’s 3rd congressional district, which is located in Philly.

As NBC 10 notes, voters are choosing a new member of congress to replace retiring Congressman Dwight Evans to represent the district.

In the middle of the interview, Mayk brought up Stanford’s support for abolishing ICE and had a very basic question for her that a grade school student could answer: who should be in charge of enforcing immigration laws?

Stanford froze for several seconds before remarking it was a good question that she needed to think about.

But then Mayk said she needed to go ahead and answer. Unbelievably, Stanford made things even worse with what she said next.

WATCH:

MAYK: You also said you’re running to abolish ICE…From an immigration enforcement perspective, who do you think should be in charge of enforcing immigration laws?

STANFORD (pauses first and nods her head): That’s a good question (pauses again). And you can…I just want to think about it.

MAYK: We need to continue, though.

STANFORD: Who do I think should be in charge of enforcing immigration laws? (short pause) Not the executive branch.

So not the president. It belongs with Congress.

Based on this astonishing answer, Stanford either wants to completely alter the Constitution which CLEARLY states that the executive branch is in charge of enforcing the laws while Congress makes law.

Or she simply has no clue how the government works. Either possibility is alarming.

The post WATCH: Dem Congressional Candidate Who Wants to Abolish ICE Completely MALFUNCTIONS on Live TV After Being Asked a Simple Question appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Meet the Democrat Trying to Save Deep State Spying Powers For Trump

Meet the Democrat Trying to Save Deep State Spying Powers For Trump

Jim Himes’s quest to hand Trump a clean spy powers reauthorization spy powers involves misleading colleagues about reforms.

House Intelligence Committee Holds Hearing On Worldwide Threats
(Photo by Al Drago-Pool/Getty Images)

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, spent last year warning Americans about Donald Trump’s “creeping authoritarianism.” Now he is scrambling alongside Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to hand the Trump administration a clean extension of one of the federal government’s most sweeping domestic surveillance authorities while working to obscure its abuses. Worse, he is blatantly lying about playing any role in that effort at all. 

That law, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, was first enacted in 2008 when Congress voted to retroactively authorize a secret warrantless surveillance program constructed under the George W. Bush administration and exposed by the New York Times in 2005. Under the pretext of targeting foreigners abroad, it has become a vehicle for unconstitutional, warrantless backdoor searches of Americans’ private communications. The FBI conducts up to 3.4 million illegal backdoor queries in a single year.

Last Friday, three days before the program’s April 20 sunset date, a House vote on clean renewal failed, despite a full-court press from the White House, when 20 Republicans joined most Democrats to block reauthorization. The spy powers only survived on a 15-day temporary extension that expires on April 30.

As POLITICO reported, Himes is on a “mission” to save those spy powers, and has been “empowered by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries” to lobby skeptical Democrats on reauthorization, reportedly engaging in direct contacts with the White House to pull it off, a role Himes now denies. A leaked email produced by the journalist Daniel Schuman from Himes’s deputy general counsel, John Laufer, urged House Democrats to vote “yes” for Mike Johnson’s five-year extension of the program. 

“The only thing I have ‘been working to advance’ is the next package of reforms,” Himes replied on X Saturday to Schuman, who accused the Connecticut democrat of “working to advance legislation that undercuts civil liberties protections” and “empowers a very dangerous president to spy on Americans without a warrant.” 

But those “reforms” Himes claimed to be working to advance are reforms in name only, say experts on the legislation like Elizabeth Goitein of the Brennan Center for Justice and Patrick Eddington of the Cato Institute. 

That “main ‘reform,’” wrote Goitein, was  “a provision that merely restated existing law, under which the government may not ‘target’ Americans under Section 702.” The provision was titled a “warrant requirement,” Goitein explained, “even though it imposed no new warrant requirement whatsoever.” Further, she wrote, that reform “had zero relevance to the issue at the heart of the debate over Section 702, namely, backdoor searches,” the practice that allows three letter agencies to query databases of Americans’ communications swept up under the program without ever obtaining a warrant. 

It’s “a bag of garbage with a bunch of glitter,” Eddington told The American Conservative.

But Himes’s quest to hand the Trump administration a clean reauthorization of unconstitutional warrantless surveillance powers has involved not just misleading colleagues about the nature of the reforms but also blatantly lying about whether there were ever any abuses to reform in the first place.

In an interview with POLITICO this week, Himes made the sweeping claim that in the last 14 months, there has “not been a single example of their attempt to abuse this database” and that “there is no program that is more overseen than this one. None.” 

Eddington tells TAC that there is no possible way for Jim Himes to make that broad of an assessment. 

“Does Himes expect everyone to believe that he’s visited every FBI field office, been given unfettered access to SENTINEL and the 702 database at every location, and conducted his own forensic audit of FBI 702 compliance?” asked Eddington. “It doesn’t pass the laugh test.”

Further, a FISA Court (FISC) opinion reviewed by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and a secret government interpretation of FISA law reviewed by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), who warned colleagues it revealed compliance problems that should cause “every American should be concerned,” cast the assertion into question. According to Massie, who has seen the court opinion but cannot disclose it due to harsh secrecy laws, the FBI and other intelligence agencies are using “an innovative loophole to spy on Americans in ways that [he] could not even tell” Americans because “the interpretation of the law” itself is “top secret.”

It is not the first time that FISA courts, which rubber-stamp nearly every wiretap request the government brings before them, have sounded alarms over their own program’s abuses. A 2022 FISA Court opinion found an FBI analyst had queried the Section 702 database to run a batch search on over 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign, with the Justice Department determining “only eight identifiers used in the query had sufficient ties to foreign influence activities to comply with querying standard.”

Among those leading the fight for reforms is Massie, who has been sending members into the SCIF to review the classified FISA Court opinion for themselves. Massie has also teamed up with Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) to introduce the Surveillance Accountability Act, targeting the government’s broader surveillance architecture; the Section 702 debate, as Massie put it, is “missing the forest for a single tree.” Their bill would require warrants to access data held by internet service providers, banks, and data brokers, and would ban warrantless facial recognition, among other reforms.

Whether or not they are successful depends on the will of other members to break with a president who continues to insist on the national security importance of unconstitutional warrantless surveillance. For the security state and its allies in the Trump administration, Himes remains their most useful Democrat in that fight.

The post Meet the Democrat Trying to Save Deep State Spying Powers For Trump appeared first on The American Conservative.

NEW: Top Adviser to Wicked Dr. Anthony Fauci INDICTED on Several Charges by the Department of Justice

Close-up portrait of an older man with gray hair and a slight beard, wearing a black jacket against a neutral background.

Close-up portrait of an older man with gray hair and a slight beard, wearing a black jacket against a neutral background.
David Morens. Credit: NIAID

One of the top cronies of one of the most destructive political figures in recent memory has been indicted by President Trump’s Department of Justice.

As The New York Post reported, 78-year-old David Morens, a former senior advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci was charged with several crimes, including: conspiracy against the United States; destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations; concealment, removal, or mutilation of records; and aiding and abetting.

The Post also notes that the indictment, which was unsealed Monday in Maryland federal court, also lists two unnamed co-conspirators who “concealed, removed, destroyed and caused the concealment, and removal of federal records to evade FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] and FRA [Federal Records Act].”

More on Morens from the Post:

Morens, who served as a senior advisor to Fauci from 2006 to 2022, conducted official government business from a private email account and asked the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) FOIA liaison for tips on how to evade records requests, according to communications first exposed by The Post in May 2024.

“[T]here is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail [sic], or hand it to him at work or at his house,” Morens wrote in one April 21, 2021, email. “He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”

Two months prior, Morens said in a Feb. 24 email: “[I] learned from our foia [sic] lady here how to make emails disappear after I am foia’d [sic] but before the search starts.”

“Plus I deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to gmail [sic],” he noted.

The Post goes on to reveal that Morens wrote that he always used Gmail because his NIH email FOIA’d constantly and he wanted to ensure none of his emails reached the New York Times.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche released the following statement:

These allegations represent a profound abuse of trust at a time when the American people needed it most — during the height of a global pandemic.

As alleged in the indictment, Dr. Morens and his co-conspirators deliberately concealed information and falsified records in an effort to suppress alternative theories regarding the origins of COVID-19. Government officials have a solemn duty to provide honest, well-grounded facts and advice in service of the public interest — not to advance their own personal or ideological agendas.

Morens also oversaw the infamous Ecohealth Alliance, which was exposed by animal welfare watchdog group White Coat Waste for handing millions of American taxpayer dollars to the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain of function research on dangerous coronaviruses.

As TGP readers know, the Wuhan Institute of Virology played a critical role in the COVID-19 pandemic after the virus reportedly escaped from the lab.

Millions of people around the world have since perished thanks to the leak.

The post NEW: Top Adviser to Wicked Dr. Anthony Fauci INDICTED on Several Charges by the Department of Justice appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump RECOUNTS White House Correspondents’ Dinner Shooting

President Trump told 60 Minutes he “wasn’t worried” during the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, despite Secret Service evacuating both him and Vice President amid chaos. The incident at the same hotel where President Reagan was shot 45 years ago left attendees scrambling and the president resisting evacuation.

Gunman’s Troubled Background

Federal investigators are examining the manifesto of the 31-year-old teacher from Torrance, California, who allegedly carried out the attack. The suspect underwent a radical transformation from Christian believer to anti-Christian, according to writings reviewed by the president. Both the gunman’s brother and sister reported concerns to police before the incident, with family members describing increasingly erratic behavior. Trump characterized the suspect as “probably a pretty sick guy” who had been “going through a lot” based on what investigators discovered.

First Lady’s Reaction Captured on Camera

The president recalled the moment mentalist Oz Pearlman was performing at their table when the shooting began. Trump noted the first lady’s alarmed expression was captured on video, saying she realized “ahead of time that was more of a bullet than it was a tray.” He acknowledged that while people don’t like admitting fear, “who wouldn’t be” scared in such circumstances. The president viewed the footage before his interview, observing his wife looked “very upset” about the incident unfolding around them.

Security Response Under Scrutiny

Secret Service agents moved within seconds, grabbing the vice president and evacuating him first. Counter-assault teams flanked the president within ten seconds, though full evacuation took 20 seconds. Trump admitted he made their job harder by wanting to see what was happening, telling agents “Wait a minute” multiple times. He was standing when agents finally convinced him to go down to the floor alongside the first lady. The president’s resistance to immediate evacuation protocols created tense moments as security assessed the threat level in real time.

Investigation Continues

CBS News correspondent Norah O’Donnell, who was present in the room, reported hearing what sounded like gunshots and attendees smelling gunpowder. Everyone hit the floor as security teams responded to the active threat. Investigators continue examining whether the president was the specific target or if the attack had broader motivations. The incident marks another security challenge for presidential protection in an increasingly volatile environment, raising questions about venue security protocols for high-profile government events.

Sources

Cbsnews: Trump “wasn’t worried” during White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting

Californians Are Benefiting Financially for Fleeing the Golden State

American and California flags waving against a clear blue sky, symbolizing patriotism and state pride.

California may be called the Golden State, but residents who flee end up with much more green in their pockets.

A report released last month by the California Policy Lab concluded that Californians who leave the state often end up in more affordable communities and are able to build wealth more easily.

When residents move, they save an average of $672 per month on housing expenses alone — such as rent or mortgage, utilities, property taxes, and insurance.

The medium home price for them is $398,000 lower — marking 48 percent cost savings relative to the California communities they leave.

As a result, they are more likely to realize a key part of the American Dream by becoming homeowners.

They are about 48 percent more likely to own a home relative to “similar Californians who stayed in the state,” according to the California Policy Lab.

Evan White, the executive director of the California Policy Lab at UC Berkeley, noted that “the price tag has gone up on the California Dream, and many families are leaving the state for more affordable places.”

“The difference these moves make is stark,” he continued. “Their destination neighborhoods are half as expensive and they end up much more likely to own a home within just a few years.”

The report also found that Californians who leave may come from wealthy neighborhoods, but they are more likely to be poorer than their California neighbors.

“Compared with their neighbors in these higher-income neighborhoods, movers, on average, show signs of worse financial health, including lower credit scores, higher student debt, and lower homeownership rates,” the California Policy Lab said.

The states most likely to receive Golden State transplants are those that neighbor it — Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, and Arizona.

California is known for having heightened living expenses combined with some of the highest tax rates in the nation.

Those policies are often cited as key reasons behind the state’s current population decline.

Beyond people leaving for better financial environments elsewhere, there are not as many new arrivals moving to California.

“Between 2020 and 2025, 42 states sent fewer people to California than they did before the pandemic,” the California Policy Lab said.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Californians Are Benefiting Financially for Fleeing the Golden State appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

King Charles Will Call for US and UK To ‘Come Together’ in Speech to Congress

Former President Donald Trump and Melania Trump greet King Charles III and Camilla at the White House, surrounded by U.S. flags and military honor guards.

Former President Donald Trump and Melania Trump greet King Charles III and Camilla at the White House, surrounded by U.S. flags and military honor guards.

Trump and the King will celebrate the past while looking to the future.

After months of uncertainty, the visit by British King Charles III to the United States kicked off yesterday with calls for unity.

Donald and Melania Trump welcomed the King and Queen Camilla to the White House as they started their four-day state visit marking the 250th anniversary of America’s independence.

As the two couples stood for pictures, Trump pointed out in the distance to the tree planted by Charles’ mother, Elizabeth II, during her visit in 1991 – it is a fitting symbol for a relationship that is a living thing, growing and evolving with the seasons.

After a private afternoon tea, Trump gave the King a tour of the White House gardens, including a visit to the beehives.

Another symbolic moment, this time looking to the future, was held when they met the organizers of a time capsule created to mark America’s 250th anniversary.

Charles and Camilla placed a commemorative coin made by the Royal Mint into the capsule, along with a proclamation from the King.

The Telegraph reported:

“The King will call on the United States and Britain to ‘come together’ even when they do not agree, in a speech to Congress today.”

The King will stress that the US-UK transatlantic friendship ‘does not just benefit the two countries, but the world’.

The 20-minute speech is expected to include references to Ukraine, the Middle East, Nato and the AUKUS defense pact between the US, UK and Australia.

“It is the more political of the two speeches the King will deliver in the US, written to reflect the priorities of the Government in the King’s own language, and is ostensibly about the 250th anniversary of America’s independence from Britain.

The main theme, it is understood, is a reflection on history, including the moments that the two countries have disagreed. But – the King will say – the foundations of their ‘democratic, legal and social traditions’ are such that ‘time and again, our two countries have always found ways to come together’.”

Read more:

President Trump and First Lady Melania Welcome King Charles and Queen Camilla at the White House (VIDEO)

The post King Charles Will Call for US and UK To ‘Come Together’ in Speech to Congress appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Alan Dershowitz BLASTS the Left—“They Left Me,” Calls Out Radical Shift (VIDEO)

Alan Dershowitz discusses his political views on a livestream, emphasizing his perspective on the shifting dynamics of the political left.

Alan Dershowitz discusses his political views on a livestream, emphasizing his perspective on the shifting dynamics of the political left.

WATCH: In Exclusive Interview, Alan Dershowitz Reveals Why He Broke with the Left

In an exclusive interview, Alan Dershowitz delivered a direct assessment of today’s political landscape, arguing that the modern Left has moved away from its long-standing commitment to open debate and reason—particularly on issues related to Israel.

“I didn’t leave the Left. The Left left me,” Dershowitz said, pointing to what he described as a sustained shift away from core liberal principles, including free speech, due process, and viewpoint tolerance.

Dershowitz, a lifelong Democrat who built his career defending constitutional protections and consistently supporting Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, identified Israel as one of the clearest fault lines in that shift. 

Positions that were once considered mainstream within liberal circles—such as support for Israel’s security and opposition to antisemitism—now increasingly generate backlash in academic and political spaces.

The issue, as Dershowitz framed it, is not disagreement. Disagreement has always existed, including on foreign policy. 

The problem is the growing refusal to allow certain positions, particularly pro-Israel perspectives, to be expressed without consequence.

That shift has had measurable consequences. Universities that once functioned as platforms for debate now regularly see speakers protested, disinvited, or shut down. Students who express support for Israel often face social and institutional pressure, creating an environment where certain viewpoints carry clear risks.

Media institutions, according to Dershowitz, reinforce that same pattern. Coverage of Israel-related issues increasingly reflects a narrow framework, limiting the range of perspectives presented to the public and discouraging deviation from dominant narratives.

Dershowitz contrasted that environment with what he sees emerging on the political right: a broader willingness to tolerate internal disagreement, including on Israel, foreign policy, and broader geopolitical strategy. That observation challenges the common narrative that the right operates with rigid ideological conformity.

In practice, conservative spaces include visible disagreements on issues such as U.S. involvement abroad, aid to Israel, and broader Middle East policy. Those debates are not suppressed; they are openly contested.

By comparison, Dershowitz argued, deviation from dominant positions on the Left—particularly on Israel—often results in professional and social consequences. That dynamic encourages self-censorship and narrows the range of ideas that are publicly discussed.

The result is a clear reduction in intellectual diversity.

Dershowitz emphasized that a functioning democracy depends on the ability to test ideas through open exchange. 

When institutions discourage that process—especially on complex international issues like Israel—they weaken their ability to produce informed and effective policy. 

A system that prioritizes ideological conformity over open debate produces weaker analysis. Positions that are not challenged are not strengthened.

Dershowitz’s comments reflect a broader trend. Individuals who once aligned with the Left are increasingly distancing themselves, not necessarily because their views on issues like Israel have changed, but because the acceptable range of views has narrowed.

The central divide in American political life is no longer defined solely by policy differences. It is increasingly defined by whether institutions are willing to tolerate dissent—especially on issues like Israel.

You may not agree with Dershowitz on every point he makes. No one agrees with every point made by any individual. What distinguishes the political right, however, is a greater tolerance for dissent and open debate. In many cases, that disagreement is encouraged. 

By contrast, the Left increasingly relies on rhetoric, social pressure, and coordinated messaging to marginalize opposing views, while conservative activists respond by inviting direct debate. 

The Patriot Perspective has recently switched its main platform from YouTube, and we would greatly appreciate it if you subscribed to us there. [HERE]

Have a question for the show? Like the video and comment your question, and we will be sure to answer it in our next episode’s letters segment. [HERE]

The post EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Alan Dershowitz BLASTS the Left—“They Left Me,” Calls Out Radical Shift (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Ilhan Omar SEETHES When Pressed About Her Suspicious Financial History | Drew Hernandez

A woman in a purple hijab passionately protests while FBI agents stand in front of a government building, highlighting a tense political atmosphere.

A woman in a purple hijab passionately protests while FBI agents stand in front of a government building, highlighting a tense political atmosphere.

Woke Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., lashed out at a LindellTV reporter when pressed about massive discrepancies in her congressional financial disclosure forms, which once listed her net worth as high as $30 million before an amended filing reduced it to under $95,000.

In a hallway exchange captured on video, the reporter reminded Omar that she had previously called her “stupid” for asking about the filing and asked how she could make “such a big mistake,” prompting Omar to reply, “I still think you’re stupid for asking me anything.”

When the journalist pressed for an explanation for LindellTV’s audience and “the American people,” Omar snapped, “I don’t want to tell you jack s—t. How about that? Have a good day,” before walking away.

Omar’s office has blamed the earlier multimillion‑dollar disclosure on “accounting errors,” saying an accountant failed to subtract liabilities tied to her husband Tim Mynett’s businesses and insisting the amended report proves she is “not a millionaire” and was corrected “as soon as the discrepancy was identified.”

The revisions slashed previously reported assets connected to Mynett’s Santa Rosa winery and Washington, D.C.–based venture capital firm Rose Lake Capital, which had once been valued in the millions, down to a range of roughly $18,000 to $95,000, raising questions from Republicans about how the original figures were ever approved.

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer of Minnesota called Omar’s multimillion‑dollar revision “incompetence at best and a cover‑up at worst,” warning that she “cannot escape accountability much longer” and emphasizing that investigations are ongoing in House committees.

Asked separately whether Omar’s disappearing millions and the reported dissolution of a “ghost winery” warrant a House Ethics investigation, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told a LindellTV reporter the issue had “not [been] brought to my attention” and dismissed the furor as attacks by “right‑wing conspiracy theorists” on a lawmaker who “works hard” for her Minnesota district.

Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!

Follow Drew on X: https://x.com/DrewHLive
Follow Drew on Rumble: https://rumble.com/DrewHernandez

The post Ilhan Omar SEETHES When Pressed About Her Suspicious Financial History | Drew Hernandez appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WATCH: Rep. Andy Ogles Reveals He Heard Reporter Say ‘I Hope They Kill the Orange MF’ While Hiding from the Shooter During WHCD Assassination Attempt

A woman interviews a man in a suit during a discussion, highlighting their engagement in a professional conversation.

A woman interviews a man in a suit during a discussion, highlighting their engagement in a professional conversation.

Tennessee Congressman Andy Ogles has said that he personally overheard a reporter wishing for President Donald Trump to be shot, while hiding from the shooter herself, during the assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday.

The congressman said that while attendees were hiding, he heard a female reporter declare, “I hope they kill the orange MF.”

Ogles went public about what he heard during a conversation with podcast host Lynden Blake.

“There was a reporter, I probably shouldn’t say this, but I’m going to say it, there was a reporter in the room who was under a table, and when the shots went off, and everybody’s hiding, she said, ‘I hope they kill the orange MF,’” Ogles explained.

“That was a journalist in the room, who was hoping that when she stood up, the President of the United States would be dead,” he emphasized.

WATCH:

Ogles later posted the clip on his X account, writing, “To the Left, it’s no longer a battlefield of ideas; it’s open warfare.”

Ogles also shared the clip from his official government account, writing:

While I was in the room, a gunman tried to kill President Trump, cabinet members, and other elected officials in DC Saturday night.

Despite this, I went to a public venue to have an honest dialogue with students who vehemently disagreed with me. My good-faith effort for civil discourse was met with shouts and name-calling.

My side uses dialogue, the other side uses intimidation.

A large number of the replies are demanding that Ogles publicly name the reporter, with many arguing that she has no business covering the White House or attending future press events if the allegation is true.

Some have called for her to be reported to the Secret Service and permanently disinvited from the annual dinner.

Blake responded to a comment asking for their name, saying she is “working to find out more on who said this.”

As of early Tuesday morning, Ogles has not yet identified the reporter.

The post WATCH: Rep. Andy Ogles Reveals He Heard Reporter Say ‘I Hope They Kill the Orange MF’ While Hiding from the Shooter During WHCD Assassination Attempt appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.