WATCH: Spencer Pratt Talks About His Viral Campaign for Mayor of Los Angeles on the Gutfeld! Show (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Spencer Pratt appeared on the Gutfeld! show tonight to discuss the issues that propelling his viral campaign for mayor of Los Angeles.

Do you think any of the other late night shows have reached out to him and invited him on as a guest? We’re guessing no.

You can watch some highlights from his appearance below.

In this first clip, Pratt talks about how some skeptics think his campaign is just an internet sensation. He scoffs at that idea and says: “The people I’m surging with are the people having to step over the naked drug addicts and step into human poop to get their $20 matcha.”

Watch:

In this clip, Pratt talks about how people in the media are always asking him which politicians he admires. He laughs as he says, “I hate these people.” He then goes on to say, “These people let my house and my mom’s house burn down.” Blasting Bass, he says, “She’s actually a terrible liar, she’s just incredible at how much she does it.”

Watch:

In this clip, Pratt explains that his campaign is a “look around” campaign. As in, look around you and see what the far left has done to the city.

Watch:

It was very smart of Pratt to appear on Gutfeld! like this. It will certainly be seen by more people than if he appeared on Kimmel.

The post WATCH: Spencer Pratt Talks About His Viral Campaign for Mayor of Los Angeles on the Gutfeld! Show (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Two-Tier Keir Divides the United Kingdom

Two-Tier Keir Divides the United Kingdom

If you’ve ever said anything the British PM doesn’t like, he might not let you into his country.

Unite The Kingdom Far Right Protest Takes Place In Central London
TakiMag
(Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

It has become a real cliché to observe that the “United” Kingdom really isn’t very united at all anymore. So it proved on the weekend of 16 May, when a mass rally called “Unite the Kingdom” (UTK) occurred in central London. Alarmed by this prospect, the embattled Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer immediately rushed onto television and declared the demo would be “divisive.”

Divisive why? Because, in attempting to unite British people in love for their own country and historic way of life, Keir said, without any sense of irony, the march was inherently “unpatriotic.” Keir accused the rally, staged by leading anti-Islam activist Tommy Robinson, of “peddling hatred and division, plain and simple,” whilst warning the occasion’s very existence proved “we’re in a fight for the soul of the country” against the forces of white supremacism. Starmer cautioned participants with police action if they misbehaved, asserting that “we all have a responsibility to speak out against those spouting vile divisive views wherever we see it.” Indeed so. Which was why, quite promptly, large numbers of ordinary people began accusing Starmer of spouting “vile divisive views” himself.

Rally Round the Flag

The UTK rally took place on the very same day as one of the tediously regular pro-Palestine/anti-Israel marches through the same general area of central London. These latter marches are something Keir has never bothered to speak out against, nor threatened with the long arm of the law, despite their far more provocative nature. 

Some commentators took the opportunity to attend both demonstrations, finding that, in the words of one writer at the UTK gathering, “Far from ‘hate speech,’ I heard plenty of love speech – love for nation, for unity, for freedom,” whereas at the Free Palestine rally, he heard only chants of “globalize the intifada” and saw Al-Qassam Brigade red triangle symbols, used by Hamas to indicate targets for death in propaganda videos, on participants’ outfits. (Were they marking themselves as targets?)

Naturally, other journalistic attendees disagreed, with the left-wing New Statesman magazine observing the UTK march was full of “cokeheads and Christians.” I wonder which the writer thought was worse? 

Writing in the tabloid freesheet The Metro, a self-described “visibly Muslim woman” complained about all the visibly white, British, and Christian people on display, saying that “it felt like the mask was truly off.” Attendees, particularly the feminist ones, may have replied they felt that was better than the burka being truly on. The irritated reporter was particularly offended by the way one Anglo-racist speaker had slices of bacon glued to his shoulders, as though warding off Muslims like garlic does to vampires. Yet this particular “white supremacist” was a South Korean.

Don’t Risk It for the Biscuit

Admittedly, there was some open hatred on display from UTK attendees—but it was open hatred against Starmer, not against all nonwhites. Many chanted “Keir Starmer is a wanker,” a now-common insult from sports crowds across the country, whilst Robinson called for the PM to be peacefully voted out of office at the next general election, something which used to be known as “democracy,” not “inciting violence.” 

One on-stage speaker did go a bit further, though, calling Starmer “abhorrent” and “a disgusting excuse of a man,” which does sound a little intemperate. However, all things considered, such language was understandable, as this woman was Siobhan Whyte, whose daughter, Rhiannon, was murdered by an illegal Sudanese immigrant named Deng Majek at the asylum hostel where she worked catering to his every whim at taxpayer expense last year. The precise reason for Majek stabbing Rhiannon 23 times with a screwdriver before dancing about and laughing gleefully is unknown, the best guess being that she may have served him some broken biscuits – it’s well-known that the Sudanese really love their Scottish shortbread. 

At Deng’s subsequent trial, it became clear the hotel was one giant tragedy waiting to happen, with other imported “guests” habitually following female staff members home and “refusing to take no for answer”—and I don’t think they were asking for biscuits. Several times, inmates were found stashing axes and machetes in their rooms, but hotel bosses refused to remove them, as they were legally the asylum seekers’ property. And, for daring to protest about borderless insanities like this, and suggesting the prime minister may just have been a tiny bit negligent in his duties towards the safety of the nation, Mrs. Whyte and her fellow rally-goers were deemed “divisive” and “vile” by Keir.      

What was genuinely divisive and vile was a stunt pulled by left-wing “anti-racist” protestors who, just as Mrs Whyte was about to speak, suddenly projected a huge slogan reading “Immigration makes Britain brilliant!” onto a nearby big screen. Taunting a bereaved mother that the death of her child was somehow “brilliant” is the very definition of a divisive act, one which, to judge by the chorus of boos it elicited, could have easily started a riot. Which, a cynic may say, is precisely what the agitators wanted, as then they could more easily mislabel the marchers as “violent thugs,” as Starmer had.    

Travel Troubles

At least Mrs. Whyte, being a resident British citizen, was able to speak. In the run-up to UTK, the PM had ostentatiously banned “eleven far-right agitators” from entering the country to address the crowd, as they would only “seek to incite hatred and violence.” That’s the job of far-left plants to do, not legitimately invited foreign guest speakers!

Who were these “far-right agitators” who had their electronic visas withdrawn before the rally took place? Most were simple American or European online right-wing commentators, like suspiciously Scandi-looking Dutchwoman Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Eva was actually already banned from Britain back in January, just after calling Keir an “evil, despicable man” for wanting to censor dissident opinions on social media “under the pretense of [protecting] ‘women’s safety’ whilst he’s the one allowing the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs.” Therefore, Eva seems to actually have been disqualified from the UK for criticizing the PM and his policies, well before the UTK rally was even scheduled, not for calling for imminent acts of violence against Muslims at all. 

None of those banned appear to have been inciting any violence whatsoever. Nevertheless, they all received identical emails explaining, “Your presence in the UK is not considered to be conducive to the public good.” Far from cartoon skinheads, several were democratically elected politicians, and not for the Nazi Party, either. One, Polish MEP Dominik Tarczynski, responded by calling Starmer a communist and threatening to sue him. Belgian politician Filip Dewinter was more sarcastic, saying if he really wanted easy entrance to Britain, he should have just torn up his passport and sailed in on an illegal dinghy wielding a sharpened screwdriver.

Visa Vices

Comparing illegal immigrants to legally barred visitors to the country may not be the best way to illustrate the hypocrisy of “Two-Tier Keir,” however. Instead, just consider all the genuine inciters of violence his government is happy to allow to fly into Britain, no questions asked. Last December, Keir specifically enabled the admission of an Egyptian dissident named Alaa Abd El-Fattah. He even bragged he was “delighted” to see him land, calling his arrival a “top priority.” 

Thinking him an extremist, the Egyptians had placed a travel ban on El-Fattah themselves, which Starmer & Co. specifically fought to overturn, naively trusting he was a wronged innocent. Then journalists bothered to check his social media accounts, easily finding he had advocated killing “colonialists and specially Zionists … including civilians,” admitted to being “a violent person,” boasted he “hated white people,” whom he considered “pigs and monkeys,” and called for the burning of Downing Street.

When it is anti-immigration whites seeking an entrance visa, the Home Office goes out of its way to scour their past online presence to find even the slightest excuse to bar them. But when it is anti-white or anti-Israel non-whites seeking one, the Home Office sits tight and waits for whistle-blowers to approach them begging for visa cancellations. 

Right now, UK Jewish groups are seeking, thus far unsuccessfully, to have the entrance visa of far-left Turkish-American political commentator Hasan Piker withdrawn, as he has in the past approved of Hamas, which is a criminal offense under UK law, calling it “a thousand times better than Israel,” and said “it doesn’t matter” if they raped people to death, as “Palestinian resistance is not perfect.” Piker has also called for the mass murder of landlords, saying, “Let the streets soak in their f—ing red capitalist blood, dude.” This genuinely far-left rape apologist presents this rhetoric as all a hyperbolic joke, but if the allegedly “far-right” rape condemner Eva Vlaardingerbroek had said those exact same “humorous” words against Pakistani grooming gangs, I doubt she’d be given the benefit of the doubt by UK Border Force.  

The classic case of such double standards at play came the last time the UK Labour Party was in power, back in 2009, when leading Dutch anti-immigration politician Geert Wilders was temporarily barred from entry as a probable “Nazi.” The supposed evidence for this charge included the fact that he had compared the contents of the Koran to fascism—but if Wilders really were a Nazi, shouldn’t that logically have been considered a compliment?

Ironically, in the same week as the UTK rally, Wilders reentered British headlines after pledging to sue a British citizen whom he accused of making illegal incitements of violence against him by publicly threatening to throw him under a train. This British citizen was former UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting, one of the leading candidates to take over as leader of the Labour Party, and thus as PM, should the failing Starmer be forced to stand down sometime soon. Can’t the next group of divisive, violence-stoking undesirables banned from the country be the tyrannical political elites themselves?

The post Two-Tier Keir Divides the United Kingdom appeared first on The American Conservative.

The American Intelligence Services Keep Causing Unintended Consequences

The American Intelligence Services Keep Causing Unintended Consequences

For 70 years, American foreign policy has had to clean up the spies’ messes.

Castro And Guevara

The Oracle of Apollo at Delphi pronounced Socrates the wisest among Athenians because he knew that he knew nothing, and acted and spoke accordingly. 

The Central Intelligence Agency and companion members of the intelligence community, in contrast, are intelligence dunces. They uniformly profess or presume to know what they don’t know about the political cultures, power dynamics, or public opinion in foreign countries. Thus, they chronically blunder in intervening or seeking to intervene to replace foreign leaders with our own puppets who invariably prove cures worse than the disease. 

The intelligence community is not populated by political philosophers or students of power like Aristotle, James Madison, or Machiavelli. They are clueless about the DNA of political legitimacy or the institutional or cultural bedrocks of authority—especially in foreign countries. They are trained to spy and think in the short run or over the next news cycle, ignorant of the forces they have unleashed to culminate in calamity on someone else’s watch. Not a single one would have been an asset at Continental Congress that adopted the Declaration of Independence or the Constitutional Convention. They would not know the difference between a George Washington and an Adolf Hitler. They would have probably backed Benedict Arnold to lead the American Revolution.

Let us begin with the CIA’s 1953 overthrow of the popularly elected Iranian prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh to install the reviled and brutal shah of Iran. Then and there were planted the seeds of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, featuring the benighted, bigoted, extremists mullahs who still oppress the Iranian people 47 years later. Today, we are at war with the CIA’s own blunder. Nothing has been learned. According to a May 21 New York Times report, “The Hard-Liner The U.S. Eyed As Iran’s Leader,” the United States aimed to replace the decimated Iranian leadership with the former radical President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He was notorious for denying the Holocaust, insisting Iran had been purged of all gays, and making summons to “wipe Israel off the map.”

But what legitimacy would Ahmadinejad command as an American lackey? He left office 13 years ago. He is no freedom-fighter like the Iranian 2023 Nobel Prize winner Narges Mohammadi. He supports Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The regime change lark collapsed from its own stupidity. 

In 1954, the CIA orchestrated the overthrow of Guatemala’s President Jacobo Árbenz in favor of a series of genocidal military dictatorships. General Efraín Ríos Montt was convicted of genocide in 2013, and a retrial was underway in 2018 when he died.

In 1957, the CIA attempted the overthrow of Indonesia’s Sukarno for non-alignment during the Cold War. It succeeded in a second attempt in 1965 backing the corrupt and brutal General Suharto, responsible for over 1 million murders of alleged communists or Chinese. Watch the 2012 movie The Act of Killing and be convinced.

In 1961, the CIA attempted the overthrow of Cuba’s Fidel Castro on the Bay of Pigs fiasco without a plan for a democratically elected successor. The CIA had backed Castro’s predecessor, the dictator Fulgencio Batista, who elicited the quip from the State Department, “He may be a son of a bitch, but he is our son of a bitch.”

In 1963, the CIA organized the overthrow of South Vietnam’s President Ngo Dinh Diem, who was followed by a revolving door of military juntas, leading to North Vietnam’s victory in April 1975. 

In 1973, the CIA supported the overthrow of Chile’s elected president Salvador Allende for General Augusto Pinochet, who delighted in torture and mass murder, including the assassination of the former Chilean foreign minister Orlando Letelier at Sheridan Circle in Washington, DC only minutes from the White House. 

The CIA obtusely conceived Ahmad Chalabi as a popular successor to Iraq’s Saddam Hussein in the aftermath of the 2003 invasion and Hamid Karzai as the legitimate ruler of Afghanistan after the 2001 attack on the Taliban regime. Karzai and his successor, Ashraf Ghani, proved even more reviled than the Taliban, which regained power in 2021.

Most recently, the CIA planned the overthrow of Venezuela’s dictator Nicolas Maduro last January, ignorant of what might come next. Maduro’s nominal successor, the dictator Delcy Rodríguez, commands little popular support. Rodríguez is no George Washington, She is not even within shouting distance of Abigail Adams.

No elections are planned either by Rodríguez or the United States. The huge Venezuelan diaspora, 8 million strong, is not returning. Most political prisoners remain incarcerated under horrendous conditions. Investment and economic activity are paralyzed because the rule of law has been taken off life support and private property sits under a sword of Damocles. 

Among the lessons to be learned by the intelligence community, know what you don’t know and tailor advice accordingly. The wise man readily concedes indeterminacy is the rule, not the exception, in power struggles.

The post The American Intelligence Services Keep Causing Unintended Consequences appeared first on The American Conservative.

Spencer Pratt’s GOP

Spencer Pratt’s GOP

The reality star-turned–mayoral candidate shows what a post-Trump GOP may be like.

Spencer Pratt Visits "Fox & Friends"

A brash reality TV star is once again winning over Republican voters. Spencer Pratt, a former star of MTV’s The Hills, is expected to advance to the Los Angeles mayoral runoff against Karen Bass. 

Pratt is not gaining support either as a milquetoast RINO or as an economic populist. His campaign is a wildly entertaining attack on LA’s liberal elite, vagrants, and out-of-control crime. It addresses everyday issues voters face, but many politicians refuse to address, such as the homeless problem. While being a (minor) celebrity, he has a relatable story for his foray into politics. His house burned down in the Pacific Palisades fire, and the politicians responsible for the disaster are still in power and have done nothing to prevent future catastrophes. That’s why he, the ultimate non-politician, entered the arena. It’s also why many Angelenos are supporting his outsider bid in spite of his Republican registration and Trumpian associations.

He’s still a long-shot to become mayor, but he’s more viable than any registered Republican candidate in recent memory. Whether he wins or loses, the former reality TV star shows a possible future for a post-Trump GOP. It won’t be a return to the discredited GOP of the years before Trump, nor will it be a wonky vehicle for “post-liberal” intellectuals. It will stress style over ideology and memes over lectures. It will be a lot like Trump, but different from the man himself.

Many things make Pratt stand out. While he is an entertaining “troll,” he does it in his own style. Unlike many Republican candidates, he doesn’t try to copy Trump’s posting style or mannerisms. Ron DeSantis famously tried to ape Trump stylistically, rhetorically, and politically. It worked fine in red Florida, but it didn’t work on the national stage. Pratt isn’t doing lengthy rants on Truth Social, “playing the accordion” while talking, or falling back on Trumpian phrases. He’s creating his own thing. He’s made living in a trailer home a distinctive part of his brand. He’s not trying to be Trump; he’s being himself. Trump wouldn’t work in Southern California. But Pratt’s bro schtick does.

While Pratt has his own style, he’s made his name in a similar way Trump did back in the 2016 campaign. In contrast to his opponents, Pratt knows how to entertain. Whether it’s colorfully insulting his opponents on the debate stage or releasing a Fresh Prince of Bel-Air parody, Pratt knows how to draw eyeballs. He knows how to make his opponents look like the dull, out-of-touch representations of the corrupt ruling class that they are. Trump masterfully pulled off the same tactic in his first bid for office. Karen Bass and Nithya Raman are Pratt’s Hillary and Jeb. In spite of his controversial past and lack of experience, Pratt makes himself look better than his uninspiring rivals. 

One of Pratt’s core issues is LA’s homeless problem. In stark contrast to his opponents, he’s not a fan of the homeless. He lashes out at the city’s leaders for allowing drugged-out “zombies” to wander the city streets uninhibited. He discusses the dangers they pose and how they’ve turned once-nice areas into nightmares. When confronted for his lack of “sensitivity” on the issue, he refuses to make any apologies. He even insists on saying it’s misleading to call them “homeless”, arguing they’re mostly drug addicts who’ve been bussed in by “scam NGOs.” None of his opponents would ever dare talk about the issue in these terms. But Pratt does, and that’s why he’s getting so much support in deep-blue LA.

It’s very Trumpian. Trump made himself stand out with a similar issue in 2016. He made immigration his issue when no other candidate would—and he did so unapologetically. He didn’t shy away from calling illegal aliens rapists and drug dealers. He was the one candidate to call for a Muslim ban following a series of deadly terror attacks in the U.S. and Europe. This was an issue that mattered to Republican and independent voters, but none of the other candidates addressed it until Trump made it a central concern. But many of the candidates, similar to Pratt’s opponents on the homeless, scolded the voters and said the real solution was to give illegals amnesty. Immigration, they solemnly proclaimed, made America great. The voters disagreed, and Trump won.

Pratt also bears similarities to Zohran Mamdani. Their actual politics are poles apart, but how they run their campaigns is similar. The reality TV star stays laser-focused on local issues rather than national ones. This was Zohran’s winning strategy in New York. Mamdani primarily talked about cost-of-living matters instead of his radical beliefs. It connected with New Yorkers and helped him defeat the establishment. Pratt and Mamdani both present themselves as charismatic outsiders who will address the issues the system refuses to tackle. Their respective issues are different, as well as their politics and styles. Mamdani is also an ideologue, while Pratt certainly is not. But their campaigns both show how outsiders can make a splash in big city elections.

Pratt, like Mamdani, recognizes that politics in the Trump Age requires a certain level of entertainment. Politicians have to adapt to the ways of our modern culture and gain voters’ interest with approaches previous politicians would’ve scoffed at. Mamdani filmed ads made for the social media age, while Pratt champions AI-generated epics about his campaign. It’s a fact members of both parties are coming to terms with. The worst crime in contemporary politics is to be boring.

But Pratt’s approach differentiates him from other Republican hopefuls. What he talks about actually matters to LA’s voters. Other entertaining candidates prefer talking about issues that make them internet stars but don’t connect with the ordinary people. The best example of this is the Florida gubernatorial candidate James Fishback. He’s drawn national headlines for his campaign animated by Online Right concerns and memes, with some articles predicting he could be the future of the GOP. But the numbers show a different story. Polls collected by the New York Times and RealClearPolitics show Fishback not even cracking 10 percent and often a distant third place. While his promises to ban “goyslop” from school cafeteria and tax OnlyFans accounts have won him a sizable youth following, it doesn’t seem to have connected with the Floridians who decide Republican primaries.

There’s a lot of discussion over what the GOP will look like when Trump leaves office. It’s commonly thought that it may replace the persona of Trump with a more coherent ideology of “Trumpism.” What that ideology will look like is up for debate, but prominent Republicans such as Josh Hawley are eager to share their version of it with the world. It’s assumed by these types that Trumpism without Trump will keep the coalition together through some well-articulated combination of economic populism and social conservatism. 

Pratt shows a different path. It will retain Trump’s entertaining combativeness, but in a style that’s not a direct copy of the president. It won’t be particularly ideological, besides opposing leftists, criminals, illegal aliens, and the homeless. It will be pragmatic and at peace with most cultural trends. It will be online, but more focused on what appeals to Instagram users than X users. In this scenario, Trumpism will be more of a style than a cohesive ideology.

Prattism just requires national candidates to carry that forward. If he manages to win the mayoral race and turns LA around, the former reality TV star could be a White House contender. But that’s still a long shot. The main issue for Pratt as Trump’s successor is that he’s stuck in southern California, and it’s tough for a Republican to make it as a national contender from that deep-blue region. It will probably be up to others to make Spencer Pratt’s GOP a reality.

Unlike other possible futures, Prattism plays well in one of the bluest cities in the country. It might not win in LA, but it can win nationally—just like Trumpism.

The post Spencer Pratt’s GOP appeared first on The American Conservative.

NEW: Columbus Circle at DC’s Union Station Completely Restored and Fountain Reopened – Sec. Duffy Announces $465 MILLION Grant to Rejuvenate Union Station

Image comparison showcasing a historical monument with tents in a park on the left and a formal ceremony with dignitaries on the right.

Columbus Circle at DC Union Station restored

For the first time in nearly two decades, the Columbus Fountain in front of Washington, DC’s Union Station is flowing thanks to the Trump Administration’s efforts to beautify the Capital. 

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy also announced during a ceremony at Columbus Circle that the Department of Transportation is giving a $465 million grant to rejuvenate the train station.

“It’s going to fast track critical structural repairs to this building, things like a roof,” Duffy announced, adding that it will be used to “fix the roof, enhance the passenger concourses, the Amtrak lounge, and the ticketing experience.”

“We’re going to maximize the station’s revenue potential with retail, with parking, with office spaces, with digital signage, and a lot more. We’re going to improve security, and we’re going to invest in family-friendly infrastructure,” he added.

WATCH:

In our effort to follow the President’s call to make DC beautiful and great again, we are announcing that we are giving a grant from DOT to Union Station for $465 million. It’s going to fast track critical structural repairs to this building, things like a roof. We can’t have leaks in our Union Station roof, so we’re going to fix the roof, enhance the passenger concourses, the Amtrak lounge, and the ticketing experience. We’re going to maximize the station’s revenue potential with retail, with parking, with office spaces, with digital signage, and a lot more. We’re going to improve security, and we’re going to invest in family-friendly infrastructure.

The beautiful fountain is replacing the tarnished, homelessness-infested dump that had been there for years.

WATCH:

Secretary Duffy and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum participated in a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the restored fountain on Thursday morning.

ABC 7 reports,

The 15-feet tall monument at the center of the fountain was erected and dedicated in 1912 and commemorates Christopher Columbus’ 1492 voyage.

According to D.C. Historic Sites, the fountain stopped working in 2007 and was never repaired until now.

The work was complete thanks to President Donald Trump’s executive order on “Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful.”

The Columbus Fountain is just one of many historic landmarks brought back to life under the initiative. On May 18, water started flowing again at the Cascading Fountain in Meridian Hill Park after it was nonfunctional for seven years.

The post NEW: Columbus Circle at DC’s Union Station Completely Restored and Fountain Reopened – Sec. Duffy Announces $465 MILLION Grant to Rejuvenate Union Station appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

SURE THEY ARE: Democrat Weirdo James Talarico Claims Republicans Are Secretly Supporting Him

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

James Talarico, the Democrat freak who’s running for U.S. Senate in Texas and loves trans kids, claims that lots of Republicans are secretly supporting his campaign. Uh huh. Sure they are.

This is the sort of desperate, utter baloney that is usually reserved for later in the campaign cycle. Remember White Dudes for Kamala Harris? How did that work out?

Talarico’s act is already wearing thin. He basically uses Christianity to support far left ideas. In case you haven’t noticed, the only time he ever brings up his faith or his religious beliefs is to defend something the radical left believes.

This bit about Republican voters secretly supporting him is simply not believable.

From The Hill:

Texas state Rep. James Talarico (D) said Tuesday that his campaign for Senate is attracting some support from previous President Trump voters who are becoming more disillusioned with the president’s policies, saying they whisper to him at rallies “like they’re in the witness protection program.”

Talarico argued during an interview on MS NOW that Trump has done “the exact opposite” of what he promised in 2024, pointing to the administration’s initial reluctance to release the Jeffrey Epstein files and the conflict in Iran, among other issues.

“A lot of the president’s supporters in Texas are feeling disillusioned, they’re feeling disillusioned with this extremism and this corruption that is embodied by politicians like Ken Paxton,” Talarico said. “And so, we have a real opportunity to build a big coalition of Democrats, independents and Republicans who are fed up with this extremism and this corruption.”

Talarico is facing embattled Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the November midterms, after Paxton — with a final-hour endorsement from Trump — crushed incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) in the Republican primary runoff Tuesday.

Even if a Trump supporter was disillusioned with Trump, they’re not going to turn around a suddenly support a far left candidate like Talarico.

No one shifts that hard from one side to the other. People on Twitter/X are calling it out.

Talarico is basically trolling Republicans. No conservative in their right mind would vote for this guy.

The post SURE THEY ARE: Democrat Weirdo James Talarico Claims Republicans Are Secretly Supporting Him appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Socialist Candidate for Mayor of Los Angeles Complains After Activists Set Up a Homeless Encampment Outside of HER HOUSE (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Nithya Raman is a member of the Los Angeles city council who is running for mayor on the far left. She wants to be the Zohran Mamdani of LA.

That’s not even an exaggeration, by the way. She has the same political philosophy as Mamdani, is supported by all the same types of people, and like Mamdani, she was born outside of the United States but feels completely entitled to run one of our biggest cities.

Recently, some activists set up a homeless encampment outside of her house. They were trying to make a point about her support for occupy-style tent encampments. She had the nerve to be offended by this.

The New York Post reports:

Brutal karma for Nithya Raman as she goes ballistic over staged homeless encampment outside her home

Socialist LA mayoral candidate Nithya Raman is getting hammered online after appearing visibly rattled by a staged homeless encampment protest outside her own home.

“I’m glad my kids didn’t have to see that,” Raman told comedian Adam Conover on his podcast released Wednesday before adding, “I thought this campaign was going to be about bike lanes and transportation.”

Raman was referring to a staged Memorial Day protest outside Raman’s Silver Lake-area home.

Footage from the stunt shows homeless people climbing out of tents, staging an open-air barbecue and one individual walking around carrying a bucket as neighbors recorded the scene.

The podcast was quickly shared on online with comment exploding because Raman has spent years defending homeless encampments near schools, parks and neighborhoods across Los Angeles while opposing tougher enforcement restrictions.

Critics immediately accused the Democratic Socialist councilmember of showing a stunning lack of self-awareness as families across Los Angeles continue dealing with encampments outside homes, playgrounds and schools.

Here’s the clip. The video is a little wonky but stay with it:

A few weeks back, Raman was booed by her own constituents for thinking that homeless camps near schools aren’t that big of a deal. Watch:

If this woman becomes mayor of Los Angeles, the city would be in even worse shape than it is now, and that’s saying something.

The post Socialist Candidate for Mayor of Los Angeles Complains After Activists Set Up a Homeless Encampment Outside of HER HOUSE (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Meet the Prominent Police Officer Who Carried Out a Steamy, Two-Year Sexual Affair with Married Obama Judge in Her Chambers

Image of a police major in uniform on the left and a woman speaking during a hearing on the right, highlighting law enforcement and community issues.

Image of a police major in uniform on the left and a woman speaking during a hearing on the right, highlighting law enforcement and community issues.
On Left: Deputy Chief Kelley Collier of the Atlanta Police Department. On Right: Judge Eleanor Ross of the Northern District of Georgia. Credits: Atlanta Police Department and C-SPAN

The individual who carried out a loud, steam >affair with an Obama federal judge has been unmasked as a prominent Atlanta policeman, causing the scandal to take another turn for the worse.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, a special committee for the Eleventh Circuit discovered that a judge nominated by former President Barack Obama carried out a two-year sexual affair in her “chambers and during business hours” with a police commander.

According to Bloomberg Law, the incidents all occurred within “earshot” of law clerks.

On Thursday, Bloomberg Law identified the judge as Eleanor Ross of the Northern District of Georgia. She is married to a DeKalb County judge and former prosecutor.

Ross was also found by the committee to have attended a partisan political event hosted by a district attorney’s campaign and to have lied to judges investigating her conduct.

Now, Bloomberg Law has identified the person who carried out this graphic affair with the Obama judge: 55-year-old Kelley Collier, a deputy chief in the Atlanta Police Department (APD).

Collier has worked for the APD since 1998.

More from Bloomberg Law:

The officer was identified by the person familiar with the situation as Atlanta Police Department Deputy Chief Kelley Collier, who commands the department’s community services division, according to the department’s website.

The report said the officer had worked for the police department since 1998, serving as the “commander of a certain division” since 2025.

Those years align with Collier’s biography on the police department’s website and his now-deleted LinkedIn profile.

The APD said on Thursday that it is now investigating Collier.

“The Atlanta Police Department has launched an investigation to determine if the person mentioned in the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States is indeed an employee of the Atlanta Police Department,” the department announced on its website.

Despite the taxpayer-funded scandal, neither Collier nor Ross has resigned to date.

The post Meet the Prominent Police Officer Who Carried Out a Steamy, Two-Year Sexual Affair with Married Obama Judge in Her Chambers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

SHE’S OUT? Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer Claims She is NOT RUNNING for President in 2028 (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

The field of Democrats running for president in 2028 is going to be huge, but according to Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, she will not be one of them.

Perhaps Whitmer just doesn’t want to answer the many questions that would come up about her horrible Covid-19 policies. Or maybe she just wants to leave the tough foreign policy questions to more qualified people, like AOC.

Either way, the country will probably be better off without Big Sister running for president.

RedState reports:

2028 Panic Mode: Whitmer Out, Polls Brutal for Democrats

We’re a long way out from 2028 — we’re not even through the midterms yet — but modern-day political campaigns are never-ending, and already pundits are speculating on who will succeed Donald Trump as president.

On the GOP side, most of the money is on either Vice President JD Vance or Secretary of State Marco Rubio earning the nomination, with some conservatives dreaming of a joint ticket.

Over on Team Democrat, meanwhile, the field is unclear, mostly because it’s so bad. They seemingly have no Bill Clinton or Barack Obama to jump out of the woodwork and inspire the base. California Gov. Gavin Newsom arguably gets the most press, but his résumé is so shockingly awful that it’s hard to see him getting through the primaries, much less the general. Former VP Kamala Harris? Voters have seen that movie before, and very few are demanding a sequel.

Another name that has been bandied about in the past is Michigan Gov. Gretchen “I will take away your seeds!” Whitmer. Well, you can count her out, because on Thursday she said no can do…

From Newsmax:

Whitmer has long been viewed by some Democrats as a possible White House contender after her decisive election victories in the closely contested state that Republican Donald Trump has carried twice in presidential votes. For months, however, Whitmer had offered only cautious answers about her political future.

But she delivered her clearest response yet in an interview Thursday with Fox 2 Detroit.

“I think there will be a robust group of people running for president. I will not be one of them in 2028,” Whitmer said.

See the video below:

She better not try to take this back later. We will remember.

The post SHE’S OUT? Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer Claims She is NOT RUNNING for President in 2028 (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

James Talarico Said Transgender Children are Perfect, Beautiful, and Sacred (VIDEO)

Rainbow flag waving against a clear blue sky, symbolizing LGBTQ+ pride and diversity.

Rainbow flag waving against a clear blue sky, symbolizing LGBTQ+ pride and diversity.

James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for United States Senate in Texas, has a long history of absurd statements.

For a man who delivers sermons, his theology goes beyond heresy.

Among the many viral clips and comments that are resurfacing as Texans learn more about his radical past is one where he says that “transgender children” are perfect, beautiful, and sacred.

Talarico was so proud of this particular line that he quoted himself and posted it on X to make sure everyone saw it:

The Bible is clear, everyone is made in God’s image:

Every human was fearfully and wonderfully made:

14 I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
Marvelous are Your works,
And that my soul knows very well.

However, what Talarico is doing here is using the “transness” of the children as a qualifier as if to say that God intentionally made them “transgender.”

Is he saying that God made a mistake? Did God put a child into the wrong body?

His claim that these children are “perfect” is in direct opposition to the Gospel.

James Talarico is a radical leftist. Every Christian pastor in Texas should expose his heretical beliefs and warn their congregations about him.

The post James Talarico Said Transgender Children are Perfect, Beautiful, and Sacred (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.