Muslim streamer Sneako: “This is the Islamic Republic of New Yorkistan.”
Third Worldist Muslim Streamer Sneako is facing calls for his deportation from the US again after celebrating the invasion of Ceuta, Spain, by thousands of military-aged males crossing the border from Morocco.
Video from the invasion shows the thousands of African migrants, all men, pouring across the border.
WATCH:
The New York-born streamer converted to Islam in 2023.
Elon Musk suggested in an X post that “he will be” deported.
The 27-year-old, whose real name is Nicolas Kenn De Balinthazy, came under fire earlier this month for declaring, “This is the Islamic Republic of New Yorkistan,” while celebrating Egypt’s World Cup win over Australia.
“Islam will be in every household, Inshallah. The whole world is Muslim. Welcome to Mamdani’s New York,” he said after screaming “Allah Akbar” and saying “f*ck you” to the camera.
“You see this city? You see how it looks? Inshallah, your city looks just like this, too.”
WATCH:
Musk previously called for Sneako’s deportation in response to Alex Jones, writing, “Deport him NOW!!”
President Trump holds a cabinet meeting at Camp David – July 31, 2026
President Trump on Wednesday told reporters at a cabinet meeting that he believes Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is to blame for a cyber attack in the state, not the Iranians.
A reported cyber attack targeted water systems in at least seven states, including Minnesota, this week. According to CBS, more than 30 water systems across Minnesota were impacted, and multiple federal agencies were investigating the cause.
The New York Times reported that Iran is a suspect in the hack, amid the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.
Early in the cabinet meeting, Trump briefly addressed the incident, dismissing the notion that Iran was behind the attack.
“Today, I just want to mention that today we heard in Minnesota there was a cyber attack, and they blamed it on Iran. I don’t think so,” the President said.
“I blame it on Minnesota because they’re grossly incompetent.”
“There was a cyber attack of 30 water plants, and I would blame it on Minnesota and the Governor, the corrupt governor of Minnesota,” he added, ridiculing the claim of Iranian interference.
Trump further noted, “Iran should be so lucky. Iran’s got bigger problems than worrying about Minnesota.
WATCH:
Later, Trump was asked a shouted question about whether Iran was behind the cyber attack as he dismissed the press, and he went off on the “grossly incompetent” governor, Tim Walz.
“I think the governor is behind it. I don’t think there was an Iranian cyber attack. I think that Minnesota ought to get its act together. It’s one of the worst-run states,” Trump said before saying that his White House anti-fraud task force, led by Vice President Vance, continues to find “tremendous corruption in Minnesota.”
A new report from Vance, Trump said, reveals “Massive future things having to do with corruption in Minnesota are happening right now.“
WATCH:
Trump: No, I think Minnesota is behind it. You know who’s behind it? Minnesota, because they’re grossly incompetent. I think the governor is behind it. I don’t think there was an Iranian cyber attack. I think that Minnesota ought to get its act together. It’s one of the worst-run states. JD will tell you. He found tremendous corruption in Minnesota. And by the way, just gave me a report. Massive, massive future things having to do with corruption in Minnesota are happening right now.
Andrew Day and Joseph Addington talk to William LeoGrande about the Trump administration’s regime change plans, some risks of war, and the best path forward for U.S.-Cuba relations. Recorded July 29, 2026.
President Donald Trump holds a cabinet meeting (photo via @RapidResponse47 on X)
President Trump and his cabinet will meet today at Camp David for the first time in the President’s second term as the fighting in the Iran war continues.
Trump last traveled to Camp David in June after signing the Memorandum of Understanding to de-escalate tensions and establish a framework for a final deal with Iran. The memorandum has since collapsed.
The US resumed strikes on Iran this week after nearly two weeks of nightly attacks earlier this month. Trump called off the attacks to continue negotiations last Friday.
However, Iran launched what the US military called a “surprise attack” on US forces in the Middle East on Tuesday.
Trump said on Wednesday, “We’re going to beat the f*cking sh*t out of them,” following the attempted missile strikes on a US base. US forces launched attacks in Iran on Tuesday and Wednesday, but there were no reported strikes on Thursday.
US Central Command released footage of Wednesday night’s strikes after the roughly two-hour-long mission concluded.
WATCH:
Trump scrapped previously a trip to Camp David with the cabinet in May, citing “bad weather conditions.”
It appears the WNBA’s current migraine may only get worse.
Indiana Fever sharpshooter Sophie Cunningham sparked a firestorm of controversy when she recently spoke to ESPN and explained that she opposed self-proclaimed transgender athletes intruding on women’s sports.
“I got a lot of negative feedback about me hating trans. And I’m like, ‘I never once said that,’” Cunningham told ESPN. “I think that I am here to extend love. But I also think with that love is truth, being honest.
“And I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn’t have to go against biological men.”
Cunningham would only double down on “common sense” when she began getting pressed by the media to either defend or revise her remarks.
“I said what I said,” Cunningham told the media. “I think it’s kind of common sense.”
Many supporters of girls’ sports appreciated a prominent female professional athlete sticking up for much younger female athletes who don’t have the same platform.
That led to a pro-Cunningham rally in Seattle — leading the progressive co-owner of the Seattle Storm to chew out young fans who had shown up to support Cunningham.
(There were also some anti-Cunningham counter-protests.)
Well, that behavior forced the WNBA to suspend minority co-owner Celeste Keaton for five home games and fine her an undisclosed amount — an ugly incident for any sports league, let alone one that’s still trying to find consistent footing in North American sports culture.
Taken in totality, this is an ordeal from which the WNBA would like to move on swiftly, but doing so may not be so easy.
According to Fox News’ OutKick, two more rallies have been planned in support of Cunningham, and both are unabashedly pro-girls’ sports.
The first rally is scheduled for Friday afternoon in Portland, Oregon, ahead of the Fever’s game with the Portland Fire.
There will then be another rally on Sunday, ahead of a matinee game with the Minnesota Lynx, and will be held in Minneapolis.
Interestingly enough, both of those rallies are being planned in two of the more progressive cities in America, Portland and Minneapolis.
And if there’s any question of how Cunningham feels about this conversation — and Keaton — the Fever guard made things perfectly clear on social media:
I truly believe there is a safe space and love for EVERYBODY. Biological girls, biological boys, trans women, and trans men. Everyone is welcome at my table! You can disagree and still be kind.
Bravo to those girls for standing up for what they believe. You’ll be hearing from… https://t.co/gIVWhEHi3Q
“I truly believe there is a safe space and love for EVERYBODY,” Cunningham posted Thursday. “Biological girls, biological boys, trans women, and trans men. Everyone is welcome at my table! You can disagree and still be kind.”
“Bravo to those girls for standing up for what they believe. You’ll be hearing from me soon.”
She added: “Truly embarrassing of the co-owner. Unfortunately shows the type of leader she is.”
ESPN’s highest-paid sports commentator in history has decided it’s finally time to own his mistakes and apologize to Kyrie Irving — who took a public flogging and an $11,400,000 pay cut during the 2021–22 NBA season for refusing to bend to New York’s COVID vaccine mandate.
At the time, Smith blasted Irving as “selfish” for a refusal that left him ineligible to play in any home game for the Brooklyn Nets.
However, last night, Smith put his vacation on hold to issue the apology after watching Anthony Fauci’s oversight testimony — where Fauci pleaded the Fifth 111 times in total, a performance that even made Smith’s friend Chris Cuomo admit it looks like Fauci is “hiding something.”
That’s when Smith realized it’s a “time for reflection” and to “look at things differently.”
“There’s several people that we all owe apologies to… but none more so than the apology that I owe to Kyrie Irving,” Smith opened up.
“This is not about him, the basketball player. This is about him, the man.”
“The reality is Kyrie Irving, no matter what we think, may have been MORE RIGHT than we have given him credit for and unquestionably was more vilified than he deserved.”
SMITH: “There’s several people that we all owe apologies to… but none more so than the apology that I owe to Kyrie Irving.”
“This is not about him, the basketball player. This is about him, the man.”
“I watched Dr. Fauci on Capitol Hill yesterday, and the person I thought about most was Kyrie Irving,” Smith continued.
“Kyrie Irving stood out in my mind because of the heat that he was taking… He refused the vaccine. New York City’s mandate made him ineligible for home games, and he linked his stance to people losing jobs over vaccine mandates.”
“In my opinion, particularly hindsight-wise, it didn’t make him stubborn or selfish. It made him brave. His willingness to stand up and say, ‘Nah, I’m not doing that.’”
“It’s just a time for reflection — to look at things differently.”
SMITH: “There’s several people that we all owe apologies to… but none more so than the apology that I owe to Kyrie Irving.”
“This is not about him, the basketball player. This is about him, the man.”
The Department of Education’s demand that California and Washington explain their secrecy policies as they relate to behavioral health data collection illustrates the federal government doesn’t understand what tools it has to impact the changes needed to save the public education system.
Current laws on the books already provide the necessary tools: The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects education records, The Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) requires informed parental consent for evaluations and also limits intrusive surveys and sensitive information gathering.
That legal framework points to a larger truth: federal protections can close the pipeline that turns children into data points, diagnoses, and referrals to dangerous, profit-driven behavioral health providers operating behind a shield of institutional immunity. Why beg for data from the States when the ultimate power comes from enforcing current laws?
Schools were never meant to function as psychological sorting centers. They were meant to educate children, not to funnel them into opaque systems where parents are sidelined, records are hidden, and families are pressured to accept labels, surveillance, and interventions never discussed or chosen.
The federal government does not need new permission to correct a broken educational system. FERPA already limits disclosure of student records. IDEA already requires informed consent before key evaluations. PPRA already restricts sensitive information gathering. The problem is not the absence of legal authority. The problem is the refusal to use the authority or the basic knowledge of that authority.
That is exactly why the National Defense Education Act of 1958 (NDEA) matters. The purpose of the legislation was to strengthen the nation through stronger education in the fields that build capacity, competence, and security. That principle still applies today. Federal education money should support reading, writing, math, science, and practical instructional tools, not expand a behavioral-health bureaucracy that weakens family authority and replaces education with diagnosis.
A child medicated into compliance is not being prepared for independence, resilience, or national service. A country that tolerates secrecy, coercion, and overdiagnosis in its schools does not build strength. It is building dependence. And dependence is the opposite of a defense-ready nation.
The answer is not more silence from Washington or begging for secret behavioral health curriculum developed by the psychiatric industry and drug companies. The answer is enforcement. Enforce informed consent. Enforce parent access. Enforce disclosure limits. Redirect federal education dollars away from mental-health pipelines and toward real educational tools grounded in science.
The Department of Education should deliver parents an avenue to obtain a receipted avenue to process violations of these laws. In addition, the Department of Education must break up the monopoly of the behavioral health industry and drug companies within the educational system. The laws are already on the books and need to be used now.
What you can do. Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!
Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive. As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.
If you listen to DSA candidates talk during media interviews and speeches, you will notice that they constantly reference the working class and working class voters, but this is all nothing but a ruse.
These people don’t know anything about working class voters, they are just saying these things in order to appeal to voters. The fact is that working class people would be hurt most by their reckless policies.
Now it is being reported that a tiny percentage of DSA members even work blue-collar jobs. It makes perfect sense.
Mamdani & Champagne Socialist Allies Masquerade as Working-Class Heroes
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) organization is making a serious play for control of the Democrat Party, advertising itself as a racially diverse, working-class movement. But a closer look at who actually makes up the DSA reveals not the workers it claims to represent, but affluent, mostly white professionals.
Superficially, the DSA’s diversity talking points seem to be borne out by the most conspicuous DSA politicians—Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Mayor Zohran Mamdani, et al. But according to its own internal membership surveys, 85 percent of the DSA’s members are white, nine percent are Hispanic, five percent are Asian American, and four percent are Black.
What about the claim that the DSA is a working-class movement? Those same surveys find that fully 58 percent of DSA members are employed in the professional/managerial class. Only a paltry four percent are blue-collar workers. The rest of them are disabled, unemployed, or students.
As Ruy Teixeira of the American Enterprise Institute describes the DSA: “Its rhetoric and program uses the phrase ‘working class’ over and over again, as if repeating that phrase magically makes its members working class. But it doesn’t, and they aren’t.”
Watch the video report below:
PATHETIC: The Democratic Socialists of America announced they have reached a record membership of 120K communists.
Fox News: “Only 4% of active DSA members work blue-collar jobs. Most in the DSA work in academia, technology, or healthcare.” pic.twitter.com/GDkigI7GTM
The same Democrat Party that endlessly lectures American businesses about “workers’ rights” is funneling millions of dollars in payroll expenditures through a company accused by former employees of withholding wages and retaliating against workers who took family or medical leave.
Libs of TikTok brought renewed attention to the scandal Thursday, writing:
“The DNC and ActBlue are running all their payments through a sketchy payroll company who were SUED by multiple employees for allegedly withholding pay.”
WATCH:
HOLY CRAP
The DNC and ActBlue are running all their payments through a sketchy payroll company who were SUED by multiple employees for allegedly withholding pay pic.twitter.com/D8qMK8oyN9
The records reportedly show that the DNC and ActBlue began using Rippling during the second quarter of 2025.
But behind the Democrat money machine is a growing stack of disturbing employee allegations.
Former Rippling manager David Behar filed a lawsuit in California in February, alleging that the company terminated him immediately after he exercised his legal right to take leave to bond with his newborn child.
Behar’s 54-page complaint accuses Rippling of interfering with his rights under the California Family Rights Act, retaliating against him for taking leave, wrongfully terminating him, and failing to prevent discrimination and retaliation.
Former engineering manager Fu Zhou made similar allegations in a separate lawsuit filed in March 2025. Zhou alleged that she was fired after taking medical leave for in-vitro fertilization treatments.
According to Zhou’s complaint, the male employee who replaced her was also terminated shortly after indicating that he intended to take family leave.
“Rippling has a pattern of bias against employees exercising their rights to take family or medical leave,” Zhou alleged in the lawsuit. The dispute was later directed to arbitration, where proceedings are not generally public.
Rippling also faces a proposed class-action lawsuit filed by a former employee who alleged that the company maintained a policy of requiring workers to perform uncompensated work “off the clock.”
That complaint further alleges that Rippling failed to pay certain wages and overtime and improperly withheld paid sick leave. That case was also reportedly moved toward arbitration.
Rippling has denied wrongdoing. An attorney representing the company told the Free Beacon that Rippling could not discuss pending litigation but emphasized that the company has never settled a family- or medical-leave violation claim and has never been found liable for such a violation by a court or jury.
The allegations remain unresolved, and no court has yet determined that Rippling is liable for the alleged conduct.
That did not stop Democrat governors from handing the company massive tax incentives.
California Governor Gavin Newsom awarded Rippling approximately $12.7 million in tax credits in 2023 to expand its San Francisco headquarters. New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s administration followed by granting the company another $7 million in incentives to grow its New York City operations, according to the Washington Free Beacon.
These are the same Democrat leaders who publicly present themselves as champions of paid family leave.
“No one should have to choose between a paycheck and caring for their newborn child,” Hochul previously said.
Unless, apparently, the allegations involve a company handling millions of dollars for the DNC and ActBlue.
The revelations come as ActBlue remains buried under congressional scrutiny over its fraud-prevention practices and handling of potentially illegal foreign donations.
As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, House Administration Chairman Bryan Steil, and House Oversight Chairman James Comer threatened to hold ActBlue in contempt of Congress over allegedly withheld documents.
ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones also invoked the Fifth Amendment 22 times during a House hearing concerning fraudulent donations and the platform’s representations to Congress.
Now Americans are learning that the Democrat fundraising machine and the DNC have routed tens of millions in payroll expenditures through a vendor facing serious allegations from its own former workers.
In a scene that should alarm every defender of national sovereignty, Spanish territory is once again under pressure from mass irregular migration, facilitated by the active policies and passive negligence of Pedro Sánchez’s socialist government. The recent surge of thousands of migrants overwhelming the border in Ceuta—prompting the deployment of Spanish troops to do nothing—comes on the heels of Sánchez’s sweeping 2026 regularization program. That decree opened a path to legal status for hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants already inside Spain, drawing well over a million applications and sending a clear signal of open doors.
Critics on the Spanish right, including Vox, have long described this as an “invasion” accelerated by the government itself. Sánchez’s administration frames the regularization as economic necessity and humanitarian justice for an aging population.
Yet the practical result is the same: Spanish soil is treated as a destination rather than a border to be defended, while public services, housing, and social cohesion absorb the strain. Irregular arrivals via the Canary Islands and Mediterranean routes have fluctuated, but the policy of mass legalization and limited enforcement creates a powerful pull factor.
This is not mere mismanagement. It is active complicity through decree and passive complicity through failure to secure the frontiers of Ceuta, Melilla, and the Atlantic approaches.
Spain’s military has already been called in to contain the latest Ceuta incident. History shows what happens when civilian authorities lose control of the nation’s territory and order.
The 1930s Parallel: Polarization, Disorder, and the Barracks
The Spanish Civil War did not erupt from nowhere in 1936. Its premises were years of intensifying polarization under the Second Republic. Leftist governments pursued aggressive marxist reforms, tolerated or excused street violence, attacks on traditional institutions, and the erosion of public order. Conservative and military elements came to view the constitutional government as incapable—or unwilling—to defend the nation’s integrity.
When the Popular Front took power amid assassinations, land seizures, and church burnings, a significant portion of the officer corps concluded that only military action could restore the state.
The parallel is not perfect, and no serious observer claims Spain today stands on the brink of 1936-style civil war. Democratic institutions, NATO membership, and a professionalized armed forces under civilian control are vastly different.
Yet the structural risks are recognizably similar: a left-leaning government pursuing transformative social policies that large segments of the population and the security apparatus see as undermining national sovereignty and internal security; visible loss of control over parts of the national territory; rising support for hardline opposition parties that frame the issue as existential; and the gradual normalization of the idea that the military’s ultimate duty is to the nation rather than any particular cabinet.
Vox has explicitly called for militarization of the borders and described Sánchez’s migration approach as accelerating demographic replacement. The Popular Party has hardened its own immigration stance. Public frustration is measurable in regional election results and street protests. When troops are already being sent to Ceuta because civilian border management has failed, the threshold for further military involvement lowers.
The Risk, Not the Reality
No credible evidence exists of active coup plotting inside the Spanish Armed Forces. Claims of imminent “golpe de estado” would be irresponsible speculation. What exists is risk. Risk that continued mass irregular entries, combined with large-scale regularizations that critics say incentivize more arrivals, will produce further breakdowns of order in the enclaves or on the mainland. Risk that crime, cultural friction, and pressure on welfare systems will radicalize more of the electorate and more of the officer corps. Risk that a government perceived as prioritizing ideology and internationalist signaling over the defense of Spanish territory will forfeit legitimacy in the eyes of those sworn to protect that territory.
In the 1930s the military ultimately intervened because successive governments appeared unable or unwilling to maintain the basic conditions of a functioning civil society. Today’s Spain is far richer, more institutionalized, and more European. That does not eliminate the danger. When a government actively legalizes hundreds of thousands who entered illegally and responds to territorial breaches primarily with troops after the fact, it invites the question of who truly controls the borders.
Spain’s history is littered with military interventions when civilian politics failed the nation. The current trajectory under Sánchez—massive corruption, massive regularization, no border control, and escalating right-wing mobilization—raises the historical risk that some in the armed forces may again begin to calculate that their oath to Spain requires more than waiting for the next election.
The responsible course is clear enforcement of borders, an end to policies that function as invitation, and democratic political contestation. The alternative path is the one Spain has walked before, with tragic results. The risk is real. Ignoring it is not prudence; it is denial.
(@VigilantFox) 
The Department of Education Already Has the Power to Stop the School Psychology Pipeline
