Commercial, but Not Purely Commercial

Commercial, but Not Purely Commercial

The unvarying routines of doux commerce are the frame for civilized human life.

Exterior of village general store in Firle, East Sussex. England

Arriving back in the small town in England in which I live (at least part of the time) after an absence of three months, I was pleased, and reassured, to find the same shops and shopkeepers that I had left behind. Quite apart from the fact that I like the owners of these shops, and wish them well, I have reached the stage in life when I dislike change of almost any description in the small amenities of life that I now enjoy. Among other things, such change would be a reminder of  how little time I have left to enjoy them. I prefer the illusion of permanence.

How pleasant it is to enjoy an unvarying running joke with a young lady with laughing eyes who serves at an excellent fruit and vegetable stall every Friday and Saturday market under the arches of the 17th-century town hall! Once, having shopped there for essentials such as asparagus, strawberries, and artichokes, I accidentally left a bouquet of flowers I had bought earlier. When I returned to retrieve it, this young lady, with mock sorrow, said that she had thought that the bouquet had been for her. I said, “I am very sorry, not this week,” and ever since she asks for her flowers whenever I see her. Every week, I think up a new excuse.

This slight and silly running joke is very soothing. It reassures us that our relations, though they are commercial, are not purely commercial, but also human: that we are not simply interchangeable objects, mere functions of an economist’s analysis, and that we recognize one another as individuals. We do not make the same joke with everyone, only with one another. 

As I go round the town, it is the same with everyone I deal with. For example, when I returned home, one of the tires of my car was slightly flat, and the car in any case needed servicing. I learned to my chagrin (and with a very slight tinge of disappointed outrage, which I kept strictly to myself) that the manager, whom I have known for 17 years and who has always provided honest and reliable advice, was intending to retire in a year and a half’s time. How dare he! Here was a manifestation of mutability when it was immutability that I longed for.

I asked him what he intended to do in his retirement, and he told me that he had always been a keen photographer. One thing led to another in our conversation, and we were soon discussing the horrors of modern British architecture, which has left no town untouched and unruined. We had discussed many other things in the 17 years of our acquaintanceship, which was commercial in its origins, and no doubt fundamentally remained so, but it was not only commercial. Montesquieu, it was, who remarked on the softening of manners brought about by commerce, at least at this level. 

I discuss her back problems with the flower stallholder, who has recently undergone characteristically useless surgery, commiserating greatly with her; the weather and its vicissitudes with the delicatessen stallholder, for whom the temperature is never, and has never been, right; and the problems of fish-farming and declining fish stocks with the fish stallholder—who has come every week, almost unfailingly, for the last 35 years. If he does not come, it is because the boats have not been out for the previous two or three days owing to storms.

I admire someone greatly who can stick so long to his job and still say that he enjoys it. He always addresses me loudly as “Doctor,” as if he wants everyone to know that I was a doctor and is proud to have so august a personage as myself as a regular customer. How he discovered that I was a doctor, I do not know—but of course, in a small town, nothing remains secret for very long. Our first plumber, who died recently of a heart attack outside a pub in which he had had a slight altercation, had a brother who did time for murder—as everyone was to inform me many years ago.    

I suppose that humanity may be divided into those who are excited by change per se and those who are fearful of it per se. For myself, I always recall the opening lines of Doctor Johnson’s great fable, The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abissinia:

Ye who listen with credulity to the whispers of fancy, and pursue with eagerness the phantoms of hope; who expect that age will perform the promises of youth, and that the deficiencies of the present day will be supplied by the morrow, attend to the history of Rasselas, Prince of Abissinia.

Johnson proceeds to show that every form of life, however attractive, has its drawbacks, and that, simultaneous desires being contradictory, dissatisfaction is the permanent condition of mankind. As he says through one of his characters, you cannot simultaneously drink from the source and the mouth of the Nile. This is not depressing; it is reassuring.

No doubt those who are not avid for change might be accused, not altogether unjustifiably, of cowardice, complacency, and nostalgia. Nostalgia in particular is deprecated because it is apt to overlook dishonestly, or to brush over, the discomforts and tragedies of the past. But it seems to me that anyone who has lived for any length of time and does not experience nostalgia must either have had a truly and consistently terrible existence (as, no doubt, some people have had) or be a miserable ingrate, and dishonest in a way precisely opposite to that of a person who lets himself be dominated by nostalgia. 

The best-adjusted person is one who both hopes for progress in particularities and understands that there are inherent limits to progress as such. No glorious unclouded future awaits us; on the other hand, it is perfectly possible that in the years to come no one will die of malignant melanoma. Once that happy situation is reached, no one will look back and sigh for the days of fatal malignant melanoma. In fact, everyone will soon forget that they ever existed.  

A balance between a sense of personal agency to bring about progress and an acceptance of the inevitable limitations of human existence is the beginning of wisdom. Very few, however, are the wise, and I am not sure that I am among them.

The post Commercial, but Not Purely Commercial appeared first on The American Conservative.

Vance Is Right About Socialism

Vance Is Right About Socialism

Conservatives don’t have to debate on leftist terms.

US-POLITICS-VANCE
Photo by Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP via Getty Images

“Government,” the late Rep. Barney Frank once said, “is simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together.”

This memorable quotation was uttered before socialists made their long march through the Democratic institutions, when government was something of a dirty word that Frank needed to clean up and render innocuous. 

Though containing a kernel of truth, it was always a bit nonsensical, even if it helped put a positive spin on the leviathan.

For family, friendship, church, private civic associations, and community are also things we choose to do together. Only one of those involves government at all, and not intrinsically so.

The nation is also a thing we do together—partially by choice, partially by our neighbors’ and ancestors’ choices—and that, too, is at least somewhat distinct from whichever political authorities happen to be in charge.

There are other less positive spins you can put on what government entails, depending on the motivation of those ruling authorities and their allied elites.

One was recently offered by Vice President J.D. Vance in response to a question about socialism: “I think in reality, what it actually means in the American context, is that you want to replace American workers with foreign workers, and you want boys to play in girls’ sports.”

That may not be the technical definition of socialism, but it is a pretty apt description of what the government might do to you if the modern adherents of this ideology ever attain political power.

Naturally, Vance’s online detractors were dismayed. They hurled their dictionaries and economic textbooks in the vice president’s general direction, seeing it as further confirmation that his idea of Infrastructure Week is leading us down the road to serfdom. (No wonder Vance is no fan of the dismal science.)

An internet hatedom and seizing the means of production are just things we can choose to do together, with the former involving more choice for everyone than the latter. 

But Vance is raising an interesting question, even if those who insist he be kept away from the 2028 Republican presidential nomination don’t want to hear it: As an alternative to socialism, is it better to offer libertarianism—or rather, the faux-libertarianism of big deficits and repeated Mideast wars long practiced by the GOP establishment—or a defense of the mixed economic system that we actually have?

There are times when the sharper contrast is certainly the way to go, no pale pastels and all that, and libertarians are an indispensable part of any antisocialist coalition. Justin Amash would have been a much more interesting candidate to debate Abdul el-Sayed than Mike Rogers, even if Michigan Republican primary voters were unlikely to see it that way. My own preference is that government be small enough that we—see, another thing we can simply choose to do together!—can drown it in a bathtub. 

But the American electorate by and large seems to have other ideas, and socialists appeal to these by retreating to Barney Frank–style repackagings of their underlying ideology. What, you don’t like government? What do you have against roads? Or the fire department? Do you prefer poverty, illiteracy, and meowing cats stuck in trees?

Notice that this list does not include liquidating the kulaks, imprisoning Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, forcing people into breadlines while wearing two left shoes, or invading Taiwan. Just nice little things that we do together. 

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is very good at trying to rehabilitate Ronald Reagan’s nine most terrifying words in the English language: “I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.” And while the “the warmth of collectivism” might not keep you from freezing in the breadlines, Mamdani is playing on the need for community that others—less radical than he—believe goes unmet by the “frigidity of rugged individualism.”

Among the main vulnerabilities of the new socialists are the government functions they want to do away with: defunding the police, abolishing ICE, forcing the Pentagon to hold a bake sale (what is it with these people and bread?) while Angela Davis Junior High School is fully funded.

To paraphrase the left-wing writer Ryan Grim, socialists will eventually need to abandon police abolition because the means of production won’t seize themselves, nor will the bank and healthcare CEOs put themselves in handcuffs.

But today’s left just isn’t that economically motivated—the DSA’s reemergence notwithstanding—and it certainly isn’t interested in genuine solidarity with the people Vance grew up with. 

Vance gets this, even if his critics do not.

That doesn’t mean that the current administration has gotten the size of government right, or that we couldn’t use a more robust answer to the country’s looming fiscal catastrophe than anything the GOP has managed to offer since Calvin Coolidge was president.

But it does convey the madness—to be perfectly Frank about it—of allowing your political opponents to call you whatever names they like, while accepting their own dishonest self-definitions as gospel truth.

The post Vance Is Right About Socialism appeared first on The American Conservative.

Minnesota Newspaper the ‘Duluth News Tribune’ Endorses Republican Michele Tafoya for U.S. Senate

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Newspaper endorsements don’t carry all of the weight that they used to, but when a newspaper endorses a Republican candidate, people take notice because it doesn’t happen very often.

The media is the media and they are overwhelmingly liberal.

It is in that spirit that people are noticing the fact that the ‘Duluth News Tribune’ has endorsed Republican Michele Tafoya for U.S. Senate in Minnesota.

Check it out:

Endorsement: Independent-minded Michele Tafoya ready for US Senate

Patrolling the sidelines at NFL games as a reporter for the national television broadcast may not seem like training for elected office. But think about it. Massive and powerful people everywhere, whether coaches, players, or others. Inflated egos galore. All the emotions and intensity of the moment. And then having to digest volumes of information quickly, along with breaking developments, in order to ask the right questions and get positive results.

Sounds a lot like D.C., actually.

And it is part of the reason why Michele Tafoya, a former sideline reporter for Sunday Night Football and Monday Night Football, is the choice for eligible Minnesota voters in the Nov. 3 election to replace stepping-down Tina Smith in the U.S. Senate. Tafoya has the smarts, the communications skills, and more to be an effective leader for the state she has called home for close to 35 years.

“Being on the No. 1 show on prime time … is no walk in the park. It’s not like you just show up and present your reports,” Tafoya said in an Oct. 2 interview with the FCC Editorial Advisory Board. “I dealt with owners, coaches, general managers, players who liked me, players who didn’t like me, coaches who were fond of me, coaches who hated me. And to face (the infamously gruff former New England Patriots Coach) Bill Belichick on Sunday nights at halftime when he’s down by 10 gave me a thick skin and the ability to say, ‘Look, I need to do my job’.”

Tafoya is running as a Republican but is no party insider. She isn’t even supported by or endorsed by President Donald Trump.

“I’m not a ring-kisser. … The only endorsement I’m looking for is that of the Minnesota voters,” she said. “I’m a very open-minded, independent thinker, and I’ve always been that way. … I am willing to work with anybody, and I am beholden to nobody. I am not beholden to party leaders, to lobbyists, or even to the president of the United States.”

If Michele Tafoya pulls out a win here – and she could – Democrats will absolutely lose their minds.

The post Minnesota Newspaper the ‘Duluth News Tribune’ Endorses Republican Michele Tafoya for U.S. Senate appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Victor Davis Hanson Notes That James Talarico Isn’t the Only Democrat Running for Office Who Has Recently Disappeared (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Everyone has been talking about James Talarico this week after he went missing for about twelve days. He finally resurfaced, but no explanation for his disappearance has been given.

Meanwhile, conservative historian and scholar Victor Davis Hanson is pointing out that Talarico is not the only Democrat running right now who has gone missing.

Has anyone seen California governor candidate Xavier Becerra lately?

Transcript via the Daily Signal:

Sami Winc: Well, let’s turn to the California governor’s race, and Steve Hilton is closing the gap, which was a huge gap.

Victor Davis Hanson: It was an internal poll, but it might be correct.

Sami Winc: Yes. And Xavier Becerra has angered the Latino community because he’s been pushing the lie that his own parents were immigrants, and his father, we’ve all found out, was actually born in Sacramento. And yes, he did go back and forth between Mexico and California, but nonetheless, he was born an American.

So the immigrant story has really angered the Latino community.

Victor Davis Hanson: Everything he said is untrue. He said he had nothing to do with losing, what, three hundred thousand people when he was [Health and Human Services Secretary]. He couldn’t even find them, right?

And then, I watched that debate, and he canceled. He just walked out of the second debate. He’s not gonna debate. It was all scheduled the day before. I think it was supposed to be tonight. He just canceled.

His advisors came to him and said, obviously, we looked at the tapes, Xavier, and you got slaughtered. You’re just a sphinx. You just sit there quiet, and then you turn to him and say, “Trump, Trump, Trump.” And then you get your little racist tidbit in, and you said you’re just wanting to get people into the country that only look like you. And then you don’t mention anything about your record or defend it. You have no idea what you want to do as governor. You can’t give an answer on high-speed rail. You can’t get [an answer] on the water bond we haven’t used. You don’t know about the homeless. You don’t know how to stop the fires.

And then he, I guess he says, yeah, but people in California don’t vote for the people. They just look at their little ballot and they say D, and 60 to 65% of the state, so they punch it. And that means to them, the SEIU and the teachers union and all these people are gonna get me more money, whether I’m a government employee and I work for the state in some fashion, or a school district, and I’m gonna get more money. And there’s all these fat cats that can pay me more money.

Here’s the video:

It really is like Kamala Harris in 2024 all over again.

The post Victor Davis Hanson Notes That James Talarico Isn’t the Only Democrat Running for Office Who Has Recently Disappeared (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

LISTEN: In Latest Ken Paxton Leak, Paxton Claims John Cornyn Working Against Him to “Teach Those Republicans a Lesson”

Two Texas politicians speaking at an event, with one in a dark suit and pink tie, and the other in a striped suit, both engaged in a serious discussion.

Two Texas politicians speaking at an event, with one in a dark suit and pink tie, and the other in a striped suit, both engaged in a serious discussion.

Trump-Endorsed Texas Republican Senate Nominee Ken Paxton revealed in newly released audio tapes that John Cornyn, still triggered by his primary loss to the MAGA favorite, wants him to lose and “to teach those Republicans a lesson.”

Cornyn allegedly said, “It’s going to be hard to learn, but they need to know that their decisions have consequences. We need to make sure they understand it.”

If any Republicans deserve to learn a lesson in an electoral defeat, it’s John Cornyn and other Senate RINOs who prevented meaningful legislation from passing while Republicans were in control for the last year and a half.

This is the latest leak from a series of audio tapes recorded at a September 24 gathering in DC.

Various snippets from the meeting have been leaked since last week in a coordinated attempt to hurt Paxton.

First, the New York Times published audio from the meeting; then, Politico, Axios, and the Texas Tribune obtained different tapes that aren’t even damaging to Paxton and used them to push a hoax. Trump has stood by Paxton despite attempts by the media to drive a wedge between the two.

MORE:

Busted: Paxton Calls for “Reasonable” Spending Cuts and Tax Cuts in Newly Leaked Audio

In the latest leak, Paxton exposes Cornyn to lobbyists and donors. In Paxton’s telling, Cornyn is “clearly not helping” and “wants me to lose.”

Paxton said his friend, who ran into Cornyn at a restaurant in Dallas, told Cornyn, ”I realize it’s hard to lose an election, but it shows a lot of character that you’re supporting the ticket and you’re supporting Ken Paxton.”

“And Cornyn’s face went red,” according to Paxton.

“He backed off and said, ‘Paxon’s going to lose. We need to teach those Republicans a lesson. It’s going to be hard to learn, but they need to know that their decisions have consequences. We need to make sure they understand it.'”

“That’s what he’s trying to do. That’s John Cornyn,” Paxton added.

LISTEN:

More from CNN:

CNN has not independently confirmed Paxton’s account, and a Cornyn representative, Rob Jesmer, told CNN that the conversation at the restaurant did not happen.
“If Sen. Cornyn wanted Ken to lose, I can assure you he’d be more active in the campaign,” Jesmer, a longtime political strategist for Cornyn, said. “He has said he supports the Republican ticket. Given all Ken has said and done, I think that’s a pretty good place for Sen. Cornyn to be.”
Asked for comment on the audio, Paxton’s campaign dismissed it as “a story that doesn’t exist” but noted that Paxton “has called, texted, and offered to have a conversation with Senator Cornyn.”
“Like all Texans, General Paxton appreciates his decades of service to the Lone Star State,” Paxton senior adviser Nick Maddux said in a statement. “We hope he will join us in our fight to preserve the institution that is the United States Senate and help save our majority.”

The post LISTEN: In Latest Ken Paxton Leak, Paxton Claims John Cornyn Working Against Him to “Teach Those Republicans a Lesson” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

HILARIOUS: Gun Control Group Tries to Make a Point on Twitter/X About American Gun Ownership and Gets RATIOED INTO THE SUN by Other Users

Glock 17 handgun displayed on a textured surface with a magazine beside it, showcasing its design and features.

Glock 17 handgun displayed on a textured surface with a magazine beside it, showcasing its design and features.
Glock – viva RGP Customs

As we all know, the left never stops pushing for greater gun control. It doesn’t matter how bad crime gets, they never give up the issue.

Every year, there are examples of law abiding people using guns to defend themselves and their fellow Americans but the gun-grabbing left just doesn’t care.

The gun control group ‘March for Our Lives’ recently posted a fun fact on Twitter/X and thought they were being clever and making an anti-gun point.

Other Twitter/X users flipped the script and their responses are great.

This is the original tweet:

Here are some choice responses:

That tweet didn’t work out too well for them, did it?

The post HILARIOUS: Gun Control Group Tries to Make a Point on Twitter/X About American Gun Ownership and Gets RATIOED INTO THE SUN by Other Users appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Scott Jennings Breaks the Brains of CNN Panelists by Asking a Simple Question About the SAVE America Act (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Scott Jennings recently caused a total meltdown from his fellow CNN panelists by asking a simple question.

Democrat strategist Alencia Jonson was talking about the SAVE America Act and repeatedly claimed that it would ‘take voting rights away’ from black people and others. Scott simply asked, “how?”

Naturally, she can’t give Scott an answer, so she filibusters by repeating the claim, and Jennings keeps asking, “how?”

Host Abby Phillip then rides in to rescue the liberal panelist like she always does and things get even crazier from there.

Partial transcript via Twitter/X:

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “[Trump] is championing a bill that would take voting rights away from a lot of black people in this country.”

JENNINGS: “Wait, what voting rights is he taking away from black voters?”

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “Oh, if we look at the SAVE Act… That is actually going to continue to disenfranchise overwhelmingly a lot of people of color.”

JENNINGS: “How?”

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “There are so many civil rights organizations that have run the data. If we look at the way that it is going to disenfranchise black voters.”

JENNINGS: “How?”

ALENCIA JOHNSON: “It’s the same reason why Chuck Schumer called it Jim Crow 2.0.”

JENNINGS: “You haven’t said how yet!”

“76% of black voters think we should show an ID to vote, 80% of Hispanic voters, 83% of the American people. Are you saying that black voters are too dumb to know what’s good for them? It sounds pretty condescending to me!”

Watch the clip below:

Whatever CNN is paying Scott Jennings, it isn’t nearly enough.

How does he sit there and listen to these people night after night?

The post Scott Jennings Breaks the Brains of CNN Panelists by Asking a Simple Question About the SAVE America Act (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WATCH: Kid Rock GOES OFF on TDS-Infected Media: “Public Enemy Number 1… Cut the Bullsh*t!”

Kid Rock speaks at Trump’s rally in Clarksville, Tennessee – October 10, 2026

Legendary country rap star Kid Rock tore into the mainstream media with fire to open his speech, where he introduced President Trump at his Clarksville, Tennessee, rally on Saturday.  

The longtime supporter of the President, who performed at Trump’s inauguration rally on January 19, opened for Trump with a scathing rebuke of the Democrats, the Islamic takeover in America, and the wicked mainstream media enabling the destruction of our country.

“It’s an honor to introduce a man who can turn a five-minute appearance into a full-on outbreak of TDS syndrome. I mean, speaking of Trump derangement syndrome, I see the media is here tonight,” he said to open his speech.

“Literally, President Trump could walk across the Cumberland River, and tomorrow the headline would say President Trump refuses to swim,” he continued, labeling the media “public enemy number one.”

“When it comes to honest debate, too often we see facts twisted into half-truths, outrage sold for clicks and views, and a liberal agenda packaged as honest reporting. Division has become their business model, and business is booming,” he added.

“Different opinions, democrats, blue dog Democrats, never scared me. Thinking differently, and having the freedom to do so, is what makes this country great.”

Then, he went off. “Cut the bullsh*t. Give us the Facts,” he said.

“That’s one thing I know about President Trump: You’re never left wondering what he thinks or where he stands. This man’s not a puppet. He’s the first president I can recall who doesn’t need a teleprompter to tell you what he thinks.”

“He’s without a doubt the toughest, most resilient president we’ve ever had. Knocked down, counted out, constantly dragged through the mud — and yet he gets up every day and fights for you and me. And he’s delivered,” he added.

WATCH:

When introducing President Trump to the stage, Kid Rock told the massive crowd, “You know what to do: show up, vote red, and do not let them California our Tennessee.”

“Now please welcome the 45th, probably the 46th, definitely the 47th President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump,” he said before Trump walked out to Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the USA.”

They were chanting USA for Trump when he took the podium.

WATCH:

The post WATCH: Kid Rock GOES OFF on TDS-Infected Media: “Public Enemy Number 1… Cut the Bullsh*t!” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NEW: DOJ Now Investigating White House TV Pool Networks for Antitrust Violations After Attempted Boycott of Coverage White House

 

The Department of Justice has opened an investigation into major TV networks in the White House press pool over potential violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which prohibits anticompetitive business practices and monopolization.

The White House Correspondents’ Association has long come under fire for holding a monopoly on White House coverage, a point originally made by OAN’s Chanel Rion during the first Trump Administration.

CNN has been replaced by Real America’s Voice in the White House television pool several times during high-profile events and Trump’s trips on Air Force One since last month.

(VIDEO) CNN Replaced by Real America’s Voice on Air Force One Again – MS Now Has Lying Meltdown Threatening Boycott of Trump Coverage

Trump has blocked CNN from accessing Air Force One several times since attempting to ban CNN, MS Now, and Politico from accessing the White House.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted a temporary restraining order reinstating their access to the White House grounds after the three outlets sued.

In the ongoing lawsuit, the outlets are now asking U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly for a preliminary injunction to extend their access to the White House until the case is resolved, as well as seeking restoration of their access to the President on Air Force One. On Thursday, Kelly temporarily extended his TRO until Tuesday, when he plans to make a final determination.

Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN initially banded together to boycott coverage of the President. They later decided to resume coverage, but only if one of the major networks was slated to provide a television pool feed. They have continued their refusal to cover the President when Real America’s Voice is in the Pool instead of a mainstream media network.

The boycotts may have violated the Sherman Act, the Department of Justice said. The act prohibits businesses from conspiring with others to monopolize trade or commerce.

“Members of the television press pool have proudly boycotted covering White House events. Group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act,” a DOJ spokeswoman said in a statement.

“The Antitrust Division is simply investigating to determine whether these news organizations have violated the antitrust laws.”

Per the New York Times:

Officials from the Justice Department contacted networks on Friday and demanded communications and materials related to the White House TV pool, the people said. The pool is a longstanding system where the networks share the responsibility of providing footage of the president and distributing it to other news outlets.
Last month, the networks collectively suspended their pool footage of Mr. Trump for several days after the president barred CNN journalists from the White House grounds, which prevented CNN from participating in the pool.
The inquiry by the Justice Department is a profound escalation of the Trump administration’s ongoing battles with the White House press corps. It also follows a pattern of the Trump administration using the levers of government against its perceived foes in the media. The Justice Department has subpoenaed reporters from The New York Times and seized a laptop from a Washington Post journalist.

This is a developing story.

The post NEW: DOJ Now Investigating White House TV Pool Networks for Antitrust Violations After Attempted Boycott of Coverage White House appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

US Fighter Jet Disables Cargo Vessel Attempting to Violate Naval Blockade (VIDEO)

US forces disabled a cargo vessel attempting to violate President Trump’s naval blockade on Saturday.

A US military fighter jet struck the vessel and disabled the ship’s propulsion without harming any crew members, CENTCOM said.

Full statement from CENTCOM:

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces disabled a commercial cargo vessel in the Gulf of Oman, Oct. 10, after the ship’s crew ignored repeated warnings and attempted to run the ongoing naval blockade against Iran.

A U.S. military fighter jet struck the stern of Panama-flagged M/V Ocean Molica (also known as the “Arika Sun”) with a precision munition, fully disabling the ship’s propulsion without harming the crew.

The large cargo vessel was attempting to transit regional waters after having previously departed an Iranian port.

CENTCOM forces resumed America’s blockade against all ships entering or departing Iranian ports on July 14. Four commercial vessels have been disabled and 135 ships have been turned around during three months of strict enforcement.

Additionally, U.S. forces have destroyed 10 tankers linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ multibillion-dollar shadow network over the same period.

All mariners are advised to heed blockade warnings from CENTCOM forces. Crews should also continue to monitor Notice to Mariners broadcasts and contact U.S. naval forces on bridge-to-bridge channel 16 when operating in the Gulf of Oman and Strait of Hormuz approaches.

WATCH:

President Trump on Thursday announced that the US will not be attacking Iran prior to the midterm elections.

“We are having productive discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said.

“I want to make it clear to everybody that, while Iran is in very bad condition, both Economically and Militarily, and while the Blockade will remain in full force and effect, with Oil flowing in Record Numbers of Barrels through the Hormuz Strait (22 Million Barrels, last night alone, with not one barrel coming from, or going to, Iran!), we will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the Midterm Elections to be held in the United States on November 3rd,” Trump said.

The post US Fighter Jet Disables Cargo Vessel Attempting to Violate Naval Blockade (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.