Month: May 2024

Rep. Jasmine Crockett loses it in Committee – starts screaming at AOC! Unreal!

The House Oversight Committee is holding a hearing tonight on Attorney General Merrick Garland’s contempt of Congress.

The Oversight Committee is expected to vote on Garland’s obvious contempt during the hearing tonight.

First, MTG blasted Rep. Crockett on her fake eyelashes.

Things are out of control in the Oversight Committee as there have been repeated outbursts from Marjorie Taylor Greene. The hearing has been tied up after Greene insulted the appearance of another member.

Greene: I would like to know if any of the Democrats on this committee are… pic.twitter.com/vl2LWpkbm2

— Acyn (@Acyn) May 17, 2024

Then Democrats came UNGLUED once Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene put AOC in her place and told her she “did not have the intelligence” to debate her.  AOC did not like this very much and pressed the committee Chairman James Comer to hold a vote on MTG’s mean words about AOC’s lack of intelligence. Wow!

Then Rep. Jasmine Crockett called for a clarification but Chairman Comer could not understand her English.

That’s when Democrat Crockett STARTED SCREAMING at MTG – This was a new low, even for Democrats!

Jasmine Crockett: I’m trying to get clarification…

GOP Anna Paulina Luna: Calm down.

Jasmine Crockett: No, no, because this’ what ya-all do.

Rep. una: Calm down.

Crockett: No! Don’t tell me to calm down! You’re out of control. Because you all talk noise and then you can’t take it!

This was insane!
You’ve got to see this to believe it!

The post CROCKETT CRACKS: Unhinged Democrat ERUPTS Starts SCREAMING During House Oversight Hearing on AG Garland’s Contempt of Congress (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Credit: New York Times/Getty Images

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito reportedly flew an upside-down American flag at his Alexandria, Virginia home in protest of the fraudulent 2020 presidential election.

According to detailed reports by far-left The New York Times, photographs and eyewitness accounts from neighbors confirm that Justice Alito’s home displayed the inverted flag on January 17, 2021—just days after the January 6 Capitol event and shortly before Joe Biden’s inauguration.

Justice Alito, in a statement to The New York Times, denied any personal involvement with the flying of the flag, attributing it to his wife, Martha-Ann Alito.

According to Alito, the flag was a reaction to provocative and insulting yard signs posted by neighbors, rather than a political statement.

“I had no involvement whatsoever in the flying of the flag,” Alito told the Times. “It was briefly placed by Mrs. Alito in response to a neighbor’s use of objectionable and personally insulting language on yard signs.”

Flying a flag upside down is traditionally recognized as a distress signal “in instances of extreme danger to life or property.” It is not inherently a political statement.

Far-left New York Times reported:

Judicial experts said in interviews that the flag was a clear violation of ethics rules, which seek to avoid even the appearance of bias, and could sow doubt about Alito’s impartiality in cases related to the election and the Capitol riot.

The mere impression of political opinion can be a problem, the ethics experts said. “It might be his spouse or someone else living in his home, but he shouldn’t have it in his yard as his message to the world,” said Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia.

This is “the equivalent of putting a ‘Stop the Steal’ sign in your yard, which is a problem if you’re deciding election-related cases,” she said.

Interviews show that the justice’s wife, Martha-Ann Alito, had been in a dispute with another family on the block over an anti-Trump sign on their lawn, but given the timing and the starkness of the symbol, neighbors interpreted the inverted flag as a political statement by the couple.

The long-standing ethics code for the lower courts, as well as the recent one adopted by the Supreme Court, stresses the need for judges to remain independent and avoid political statements or opinions on matters that could come before them.

“You always want to be proactive about the appearance of impartiality,” Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge and the director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute, said in an interview. “The best practice would be to make sure that nothing like that is in front of your house.”

The court has also repeatedly warned its own employees against public displays of partisan views, according to guidelines circulated to the staff and reviewed by the Times. Displaying signs or bumper stickers is not permitted, according to the court’s internal rule book and a 2022 memo reiterating the ban on political activity.

When did the Democrats become patriotic?

The account by far-left The New York Times and the subsequent portrayal by some judicial experts might be critiqued for demonstrating a bias against conservative figures. The focus should be on questioning why similar scrutiny or interpretation of law is not always applied uniformly across political spectrums, particularly when actions or expressions by liberal justices or public figures come into play.

It can be recalled that Justice Alito issued a harsh rebuke last year against leftist lawmakers in Congress trying to implement an ethics code for the Court.

The behavior of Supreme Court justices has been in the spotlight recently as the left has been trying to take down conservative judges Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas for alleged ethics violations.

Now, liberals in Congress are trying to mandate a SCOTUS ethics code, probably in the hope that one of the conservative justices will be caught violating it and be impeached.

Unfortunately for the left, Alito has just told them that that is just not going to happen.

“I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it,” Alito said. “No provision in the Constitution gives [Congress] the authority to regulate the Supreme Court — period.”

The post Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Accused of Flying Upside-Down Flag in Protest of Stolen 2020 Presidential Election appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a recent media appearance, Republican Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas pointed out that in the New York Trump trial there is no evidence of any crime.

He suggested that the judge should go around the jury completely and direct a verdict of not guilty.

Even better? He said all of this on CNN.

Breitbart News has more details:

Cotton: ‘There’s Been No Evidence of Any Crime Whatsoever’ in Trump’s NYC Trial

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) said Thursday on CNN’s “News Central” that “there’s been no evidence of any crime whatsoever” in former President Donald Trump’s New York business record case.

Host Kate Bolduan said, “We’ve seen Republican lawmakers quite a lot of them coming to New York City to sit in on Donald Trump’s trial to show their support for him.”

She asked, “Do you think it’s important for anyone who wants to be VP to have to show up to this trial? I mean, do you think anyone do you think someone can get the job without it?”

Cotton said, “I turned in my law license 20 years ago and I haven’t seen inside of a courtroom since then and I don’t have any plans to do so in the future. I agree with what President Trump said. It’s important that we do our job as legislators in Washington, for instance making sure that we overturn Joe Biden’s de facto arms embargo and get Israel, the weapons it needs.”

See the video below:

Senator Tom Cotton:

“If the prosecution rests its case based on the evidence they’ve put forward, then this judge should redeem himself for all the erroneous rulings he’s made so far by directing a verdict of NOT GUILTY because there’s been no evidence of a crime whatsoever” pic.twitter.com/FvaGrMEw0S

— AJ Huber (@Huberton) May 16, 2024

Cotton is absolutely right about this. Just a reminder…

The judge’s daughter got paid by Goldman. How on earth can you have someone who pays off the judge’s family deliberately coaching witnesses in the trial, and call it a fair trial? You can’t. This entire thing is a farce. https://t.co/DtcEKuqYMN

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) May 14, 2024

It is a farce. And an insult to the American people.

The post Senator Tom Cotton on Sham NYC Trump Trial: ‘No Evidence of Any Crime Whatsoever’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Credit: Getty Images

Over three dozen agents from the U.S. Secret Service have called for an urgent congressional investigation into Joe Biden’s Marxist diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, Tampa Press reported.

These policies are undermining the agency’s effectiveness and posing a potential threat to national security, according to a petition that surfaced last week.

The petition, endorsed by at least 39 agents, was highlighted by Bloomberg White House correspondent Jennifer Jacobs on social media. It specifically calls out the administration’s DEI policies, suggesting they may be responsible for a string of incidents that reveal a concerning drop in operational readiness and possible bias in disciplinary practices.

“There’s a petition circulating inside the US Secret Service that flags concerns about “a number of recent Secret Service incidents indicative of inadequate training,” a double standard in disciplinary actions, and a vulnerability “to potential insider threats” that could pose a risk to US nat sec. It was first shared Monday, I’m told, and has 39 signatures so far. Aim is to call for a congressional investigation, petition says,” Jacobs wrote.

News: There’s a petition circulating inside the US Secret Service that flags concerns about “a number of recent Secret Service incidents indicative of inadequate training,” a double standard in disciplinary actions, and a vulnerability “to potential insider threats” that could…

— Jennifer Jacobs (@JenniferJJacobs) May 9, 2024

According to RealClear Politics, the petition was launched after a disturbing incident involving Michelle Herczeg, a female Secret Service agent assigned to Kamala Harris, who reportedly engaged in a physical altercation with her male superior at Joint Base Andrews last month.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Herczeg began acting aggressively, speaking gibberish and shouting incoherently at other agents while they were near the lounge at JBA.

Herczeg reportedly threw menstrual pads at another agent before getting into a brawl a JBA.

RealClearPolitics reported that Herczeg grabbed a male agent’s personal cell phone and began deleting apps on it before she completely melted down.

Agent Herczeg had to be physically restrained and her firearm was taken away from her. She was handcuffed and taken to the hospital in an ambulance.

“Herczeg then chest-bumped and shoved her superior, then tackled him and punched him. The agents involved in restraining Herczeg were especially concerned because she still had her gun in the holster. They wrestled her to the ground, took the gun from her, cuffed her, and then removed her from the terminal,” RealClearPolitics reported.

One other agent was also hospitalized. A major DEI fail.

In response to the unfolding scandal, Secret Service Chief of Communications Anthony Guglielmi was quick to defend the agency’s diversity policies.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Guglielmi claimed that the Secret Service prides itself on its diverse workforce, which he argued enhances the agency’s effectiveness.

“It’s evident that this anonymous petitioner does not embody the U.S. Secret Service’s values of service over self,” Guglielmi said.

“Our agency is comprised of talented professionals from various walks of life who are dedicated to safeguarding the continuity of the presidency and the U.S. financial system. Our strength comes from our diversity, in the knowledge, skills, experience, and perspective each employee brings,” Guglielmi added.

“Our people are exceptional, and we are incredibly proud to call them members of the U.S. Secret Service.”

The post Report: 39 Secret Service Agents Demand Investigation into Biden’s Marxist DEI Policies Following Unusual Assault by Female Agent on Male Superior appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico is dragged to his car after he was shot today.

 

Yesterday, a ‘lone wolf’ gunman attempted to assassinate the “pro-Trump” Prime Minister of Slovakia, PM Robert Fico.  Fico is reportedly in critical but stable condition after five shots were fired at point-blank range.  The AP cites “unconfirmed media reports” that it was a “71-year-old retiree” and “amateur poet” responsible for the attempt.

Leftist writer Juraj Cintula is arrested after he fired five shots at populist Prime Minister Robert Fico in Slovakia today.

 

Unconfirmed reports online also suggest that the shooter was 71-year-old Juraj Cintula, a left-wing activist and a member of the “Movement Against Violence” organization.  A video shared on X appears to show a beat-up Cintula giving a brief statement while in police custody.

+++UPDATE IM FALL FICO+++

Video des linken Attentäters Juraj Cintula aus der Polizeigewahrsam geleakt. pic.twitter.com/5hNW8WdDnB

— Theresa Finn (@Theresa_Finn_) May 16, 2024

ABC News quickly published an article titled, “Who is Robert Fico, the populist Slovak prime minister wounded in a shooting?” after the events yesterday.

In it, they claim that Fico was a “member of the Community Party before the dissolution of communism” and went on to be elected to “Slovakia’s parliament in 1992 as a member of the Party of the Democratic Left.”

Fico would become the chairman of the Smer party in 1999.  The Smer Party is described as “left-populist,” while noting that Fico himself has been compared to “right-wing politicians like the nationalist prime minister of Hungary, Viktor Orban.”

From ABC News:

Fico’s return to power caused concern among his critics that he and his party — which had long been tainted by scandal — would lead Slovakia away from its pro-Western course. He vowed to pursue a “sovereign” foreign policy, promised a tough stance against migration and non-governmental organizations, and campaigned against LGBTQ+ rights.

He earned a reputation for his tirades against journalists, and faced criminal charges in 2022 for allegedly creating a criminal group and misuse of power, but the charges were dropped by Slovakia’s prosecutor general.

While Fico is opposed to gay marriage, which is currently not recognized in Slovakia but is not against the law, the extent of his LGBTQ policy seems to focus on stopping the promotion of sexual ideology in schools, according to France24.  The outlet quoted a social media post where Fico said:

“Seventy three genders?  Sick.  Convert 12-year-old girls to boys?  Sick.”  France24 even goes as far as citing actions taken by Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis.

Allegations that Fico created a “criminal group and misuse of power” that were eventually dropped sound strikingly familiar to President Trump’s RICO (a criminal group?) charges in Fulton County for challenging the results in a corrupt election (misuse of power?).  Interesting.

So how does US state-run Mockingbird Media reporting on Fico vary from that of other state-run media that is less ‘friendly’ to the US and its NATO allies?  Keep in mind that Slovakia is both a member of NATO and the European Union.

RT (Russia Today) released their own assessment of Fico using direct quotes from the Slovakian Prime Minister.

On the cause of and progress of the war in Ukraine, RT cited Fico as saying the following:

“I say it loud and clear and will do so: The war in Ukraine didn’t start yesterday or last year. It began in 2014 when the Ukrainian Nazis and fascists started to murder Russian citizens in Donbass and Lugansk.”
“Russia completely controls the occupied territories militarily, Ukraine is not capable of any meaningful military counter-offensive, [and] it has become completely dependent on financial aid from the West with unforeseeable consequences for Ukrainians in the years to come.”

In regards to funding for Ukraine, Fico is on the record stating:

“If the strategy is to continue to pour money there, €1.5 billion per month without any result, and we have to cut our own resources? After all, we have huge problems, and public money is in a difficult state.”
“I will support zero military aid to Ukraine… An immediate halt to military operations is the best solution we have for Ukraine. The EU should change from an arms supplier to a peacemaker.”

After several proclamations from NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg that Ukraine will be a part of NATO, Fico remains a fierce opponent to the idea:

“Ukraine may say: ‘We want to join NATO.’ This will be their own decision. We are saying that we will not ratify [the documents on Ukraine’s accession to NATO] in parliament because Slovakia needs a neutral Ukraine. Slovakia’s interests will be threatened if Ukraine becomes a NATO member.”
“I will tell him [Ukrainian Prime Minister Denis Shmigal] that I am against the membership of Ukraine in NATO and that I will veto it. It would merely be a basis for World War III, nothing else.”
“I am against the membership of Ukraine in NATO and I will veto it. If Ukraine were in NATO, some conflicts will be constantly instigated there, and once a clash happens between Russia and a NATO member state, we will have a world war.”

But perhaps the most concerning quotes from Fico leading up to the assassination attempt are the following:

“The atmosphere [at a combined meeting of EU and NATO officials on Ukraine held in Paris in February] was totally belligerent: to continue the war at all costs and do everything to make the war go on. I was very surprised that not a single word was said about some peace plan or a peace initiative. Yes, I can confirm that there are countries that are ready to send troops to Ukraine. There also are countries that say ‘never’ to that, and Slovakia is one of them. And there are some countries that say such ideas deserve consideration”
“Ukraine is not a sovereign, independent country, Ukraine is under the absolute influence of the United States of America – and in this the EU is making a huge mistake, not wanting to keep a sovereign view of Ukraine and only agreeing to what the US says.”
“If we can’t tell the truth at the Brussels table that, for example, anti-Russian sanctions didn’t work, that further destruction of Ukraine and killing Ukrainians is going nowhere, that the fanatic implementation of the Green Deal is killing our economies, that 20,000 casualties in the Gaza Strip cannot be overlooked just because Israel causes them, we are on a slippery slope that can be not only politically, but also economically destructive for Europe.”

Another article from RT quotes EU’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell saying that Russia is Europe’s “most existential threat” and that Putin will not stop at Ukraine if he succeeds:

“Today, Putin is an existential threat to all of us. If Putin succeeds in Ukraine, he will not stop there,” Borrell stated, adding that a Russian victory would undermine the security of Europe. However, “not everybody in the European Union shares this assessment,”

“Some European Council’s members say: ‘Well, no, Russia is not an existential threat. At least not for me. I consider Russia a good friend,’” Borrell said, without naming specific counties. “In a union governed by unanimity, our policies on Russia are always threatened by a single veto – one is enough.”

According to US media, Fico is a pro-Russian/anti-American Communist-turned-populist alleged criminal who plans to “take control of public media.”

However, according to Fico’s quotes cited by RT, he seems to be a Slovakia-First realist who understands the critical implications to his country, and the world, regarding a continued war between Ukraine and Russia that would eventually lead to WWIII.  He is avidly against signing away Slovakia’s sovereignty to the World Health Organization in their Pandemic Treaty and has taken a firm stance against admitting Ukraine into NATO, a decision his single vote is capable of stopping.

And he was shot yesterday by an alleged ‘lone wolf’ gunman who supports progressive, pro-Ukraine ideologies.

But he survived.

The post Slovakian PM Robert Fico was a Thorn in the Side of Ukraine Funding and EU/NATO Admission and the WHO Pandemic Treaty and an Avid Supporter of Slovakian Sovereignty appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Fox Business host Neil Cavuto actually pushed back on Joe Biden’s lies Thursday morning.

Joe Biden has falsely claimed that inflation was 9% when he took office. It was 1.4% in January 2021.

Biden’s lie was so egregious that the Washington Post gave him four Pinocchio’s.

Joe Biden has now twice in one week claimed that inflation was at 9% when he took office.

It’s a particularly hilarious lie because inflation was 1.4% when he took office and hit a HIGH OF 9.1% in June 2022.

That was the largest increase over 12 months since 1981. pic.twitter.com/TnVMVduDQw

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) May 14, 2024

Neil Cavuto asked Biden’s Econ Advisor Jared Bernstein why Joe Biden keeps claiming inflation was 9% when he took office when it was actually 1.4%.

“The president talked about how concerned he was for households struggling with prices,” Bernstein said.

Cavuto wasn’t having it and pushed back on Jared Bernstein.

“That’s not what I asked you. Why does he keep misrepresenting this?” Neil Cavuto said.

Bernstein continued to lie: “He’s making the point that the factors that caused inflation to climb to 9% were in place when he took office.”

“That’s not what he said! He said it was 9%!” Cavuto said.

“The annual growth in core inflation in the second quarter of ’21 was, in fact, about 9%…” Jared Bernstein said.

“No it wasn’t — it was not at that! You’re almost as bad as he is!” Cavuto said.

WATCH:

CAVUTO: Why does Biden keep claiming inflation was 9% when he took office — when it was actually 1.4%?

BERNSTEIN: “The president talked about how concerned he was for households struggling with prices.”

CAVUTO: “That’s not what I asked you. Why does he keep misrepresenting… pic.twitter.com/lMaKNfeSOV

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 16, 2024

The post FIREWORKS! Neil Cavuto Goes Off on Joe Biden For Falsely Claiming Inflation Was 9% When He Took Office (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Credit: Getty Images

Kansas City is now in the crosshairs of a significant investigation for potential human rights violations following the doxxing of Harrison Butker, the kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs.

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has taken a strong stance, announcing an investigation under the Missouri Human Rights Act to uphold the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution.

“My office is demanding accountability after Kansas City doxxed Harrison Butker last night for daring to express his religious beliefs,” AG Bailey announced.

“I will enforce the Missouri Human Rights Act to ensure Missourians are not targeted for their free exercise of religion,” he added.

BREAKING: My office is demanding accountability after@KansasCity doxxed @buttkicker7 last night for daring to express his religious beliefs.

I will enforce the Missouri Human Rights Act to ensure Missourians are not targeted for their free exercise of religion.

Stay tuned.

— Attorney General Andrew Bailey (@AGAndrewBailey) May 16, 2024

Bailey has issued a formal demand to Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas for the immediate release of all documents and communications related to a controversial post made on the social media platform X.

The post in question leaked personal details about Butker following his speech at a graduation ceremony, where he shared his Christian beliefs. This act of doxxing is a direct attack on his right to freely express his religious views.

The post was then deleted. However, screenshots had already been captured.

Screenshot: Kansas City/X

“Missourians of faith deserve to know why Kansas City officials decided to attack Mr. Butker for his deeply held religious beliefs,” said Attorney General Bailey.

In response, Kansas City issued an apology, saying, “We apologize for our previous tweet. It was shared in error.”

We apologies for our previous tweet. It was shared in error.

— Kansas City (@KansasCity) May 16, 2024

Read Bailey’s letter to Mayor Lucas below:

It has been reported that the city of Kansas City has retaliated against a well-respected local resident and member of the Kansas City Chiefs after he spoke about his religious views. Your office’s X account likely publicly released residential location information on a private citizen, Harrison Butker, in an attempt to retaliate against him for expressing his sincerely held religious beliefs at a religious college’s commencement ceremony—to an audience that largely shares his views.

Use of government social media to retaliate against an individual based on their religious beliefs amounts to discriminatory behavior that is not tolerated under our Constitution or Missouri statute.

Our nation is founded on a bedrock commitment to the free exercise of religion. In addition, Missouri law specifically prohibits faith based discrimination against Missouri residents. Yet, your office apparently believes it is appropriate to denigrate a devout Catholic for comments he made about his own faith at a religious college.

The speech I am referencing was given by Chiefs all-star kicker Harrison Butker at Benedictine College a private, religious college. This college openly affirms that it “is committed to those beliefs and natural principles that form the framework of the Judeo-Christian tradition, and it is committed further to those specific matters of faith of the Roman Catholic tradition…” Yet, speaking to a group of fellow Catholics about theological issues important to their shared faith at a graduation ceremony at a private college prompted a retaliatory social media post by your office.

Missouri’s Human Rights Act prohibits government actors from discriminating against citizens because of their sincerely held religious beliefs. In addition to the city of Kansas City’s attack on Mr. Butker, there is an effort to force his employer to take disciplinary action against him. To any employer or government official considering such a move, I assure you that I am prepared to use the authority provided in statute to defend the principle of free religious expression.

Missouri law states the following:

Whenever the attorney general has a reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights granted by this chapter or that any group of persons has been denied any of the rights granted by this chapter, and such denial raises an issue of general public importance, he may bring a civil action to any appropriate state court|.] Section 213.126.1, RSMo.

That is not the only concerning and potentially unlawful conduct. Given that your office’s official account identified where Mr. Butker may reside, it is plausible that Kansas City government officials misappropriated government resources and information to find Mr. Butker’s city of residence. This was irresponsible at best, and is potentially a violation of Missouri law. Missourians deserve better from our elected leaders.

Mr. Butker was well within his rights to discuss his religious views—views which are shared by millions of members of his faith tradition. Sadly, history is filled with examples of people of religious faith being targeted for their beliefs by government officials. Please see enclosed demand for information related to your office’s retaliatory social media post.

Meanwhile, the NFL has distanced itself from Butker’s statements that were critical of President Joe Biden’s leadership and opposed certain progressive policies. Jonathan Beane, the NFL’s Senior Vice President and Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, emphasized the league’s stance, stating, “Harrison Butker gave a speech in his personal capacity. His views are not those of the NFL as an organization. The NFL is steadfast in our commitment to inclusion, which only makes our league stronger.”

The post Kansas City Under Investigation for Alleged Human Rights Violations After Doxxing Chiefs’ Kicker Harrison Butker appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Staten Island artist Scott Lobaido unveiled his latest art installation titled, “Dicks of Hazard” in New York City outside of the courthouse where Alvin Bragg is holding a Soviet-style show trial against President Trump.

100 pink phallic balloons featuring faces of Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Judge Engoron and Judge Merchan were released on Thursday.

The artist told The New York Post that he released the balloons to show that “these guys are a bunch of useless dicks.”

“As a New Yorker, this is how we talk,” Scott Lobaido told the New York Post.

WATCH:

PENIS STUNT: Scott Lobaido unveiled a display of 100 pink, penis-shaped balloons adorned with the faces of Trump haters, including Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, US Special Counsel Jack Smith, and Manhattan Judges Juan Merchan and Arthur Engoron. pic.twitter.com/0pfPHnSVsF

— NYScanner (@nyscanner) May 16, 2024

Penis balloon with Jack Smith’s face floats through Manhattan.

Should be Time Magazine photo of the year. pic.twitter.com/wwgEdv6x0I

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) May 16, 2024

TGP contributor Paul Ingrassia was at the courthouse on Thursday and caught Scott Lobaido’s latest art installation on video.

BREAKING: Video of pro-Trump artist Scott Lobaido releasing his protest balloons outside the courthouse where President Trump’s show trial is currently underway from earlier today. https://t.co/qMBH0QVRdv pic.twitter.com/75imOpQ0SA

— Paul Ingrassia (@PaulIngrassia) May 16, 2024

The artist blasted the left-wing prosecutors and judges attacking Trump with lawfare.

WATCH:

Here’s another video of Lobaido discharging his anti-Bragg balloons! https://t.co/cvcGYHIjqQ pic.twitter.com/XKPZhYePfF

— Paul Ingrassia (@PaulIngrassia) May 16, 2024

The post Pro-Trump Artist Scott Lobaido Unveils “D*cks of Hazard” Outside Manhattan Courthouse with Faces of Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Engoron and Merchan (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Last July, after more than 1,000 days of incarceration without a trial at that time, J6er Jake Lang launched a new platform called Blessed News.  The Gateway Pundit highlighted the outlet and has often highlighted Lang’s struggles, including his most recent interview after 1,200 days incarcerated without a “speedy trial.”

Now, each and every Wednesday night at 8 pm EST, The Gateway Pundit is live-streaming an episode of Inside J6.  Each episode includes a brief recap of recent news regarding the DC protest, including those most recently released and, unfortunately, recently incarcerated.

Past guests have included Cowboys for Trump’s Couy Griffin, recently convicted Praying Grandma, and a Vietnamese migrant who just wanted to spend some time with her son on a road trip.

In this weeks episode, we cover J6 Political Prisoner Marc Bru’s stories about the mistreatment of fellow inmates, USCP crybaby Harry Dunn’s congressional flop despite major Establishment Dem endorsements, an interesting take on Jack Smith’s violation of the same law J6ers are serving years in-prison for, and an Epoch Times article detailing the exorbitant number of new J6 political prisoners in comparison to the last two years, and more!

Ethan Nordean got 18 years for shaking a fence on Jan 6 and walking thru an open door with Capitol police standing by https://t.co/dM3AJ8ZBCk

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) May 15, 2024

Each episode includes an exclusive interview with a J6er. However, this week’s show had a last-minute cancellation as we were going live.  So instead, you get to hear my personal J6 story and how I ended up fighting for free and fair elections, our J6ers, and America First policy.  Enjoy!

(For ad-free viewing and to push back against the tyrannical censorship on platforms such as YouTube and Meta, download the Rumble app in your phone’s app store)

 

 

 

The post Blessed News’ and Gateway Pundit’s “Inside J6” Podcast – a Weekly Recap on J6 News and Exclusive Interviews appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The internet is exploding over a speech given by Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker where he stood for traditional Christian principles.

The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft reported,

The NFL has officially distanced itself from Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker’s recent commencement speech at a private college in Kansas. During his address, Butker urged women graduates to embrace the role of “homemaker” and issued sharp criticisms of the LGBTQ community and Joe Biden’s abortion and lockdown policies.

Jonathan Beane, the NFL’s Senior Vice President and Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, told People, “Harrison Butker spoke in his personal capacity. His views do not reflect those of the NFL. We remain committed to promoting an inclusive environment, which strengthens our league.”

Butker, a three-time Super Bowl Champion, delivered his remarks at Benedictine College on Saturday, focusing on the decline in moral values under the Biden regime.

He accused the president of hypocrisy, noting the incongruence between Biden’s public Catholic faith and his pro-abortion stance, calling it a “delusional” act that misleads on the possibility of being both Catholic and pro-abortion.

The great irony of the situation is that the downpour of moral outrage far outweighs that which has been seen in the past when NFL players did truly awful things. Players have beaten their wives and children, faced criminal drug charges, abused animals, and been arrested for drunk driving. In nearly all of these cases the public outrage has been near crickets in comparison to the backlash Butker is facing.

The left loves to preach at us about “diversity and inclusion” so long as that does so-called diversity does not leave any room for a traditional Christian worldview. What is right is called wrong and what is wrong is called right. It is time for more common sense Americans and Christians to speak truth to a world that so clearly needs it.

 

The post Victor Reacts: Selective Outrage Over Butker’s Speech – Christians Need to Speak Up (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.