Month: July 2024

Guest post by Jay Valentine at Omega4America

The first week of August is the last time to take anyone off the voter rolls.

As many will find, very few voters have been removed from voter rolls for the last 4 years.

Voter rolls protect people – if they have a name, thus an identity.

40 years of election law make sure no person is ever taken off a voter roll unless there is some extraordinary circumstance.  That’s the thing about disenfranchisement.

Leftists know this – so they load up voter rolls with illegal aliens knowing the feckless Republicans will never challenge a guy named Jose Rodriguez – who is registered at a Walmart – has no social media presence – never voted before – and speaks no English.

Republicans are terrified to challenge anyone individually – so they litigate against masses of voter laws that screw them – and of course, they lose.

The Fractal team, working in several states came up with a different strategy.

Why challenge a person?

Challenge an address.

Make Mark Elias defend sending 10 ballots to a Walmart, 18 ballots to a gas station, and 31 to a vacant lot.  I dare you!

The Fractal team tried this in 2022 in Wisconsin.

They created lists of every address in the state – that had a registered voter – but had no bedrooms.  Wow, what an idea.

Since none of the national voter integrity groups, and the RNC have the technology to cross check voter rolls with property tax rolls – they never thought of this strategy.

What happened?  A U.S. Senate seat was saved.

In 2024, these teams built databases in all the swing states – comparing property tax rolls with voter rolls.

Here are 23 people living at addresses the property tax roll – an official government roll – says is a strip mall.  Oops, no bedrooms – stop a ballot from going there.

Beginning in earnest in 2022, late in the year, illegal aliens were being registered by NGOs (non-governmental orgs) and they did not register them at homes – they registered them at ballot mills.

These were locations like empty coffee shops – which would get mail – but nobody lived there.

Why not track every NGO – not some – but millions of them – tracking every dollar spent, every dollar received – every employee to see if they may be at another NGO (many are) – and tying many to the Chinese government-sponsored or affiliated NGOs working for Leftists?

Here is a video of how we did it:

Fractal did it and the results are spectacular.

For the first time, every NGO dollar is tracked – and when it is tied to a nefarious org – they are outed.

It may be too late to take anyone off the rolls – especially since few have been removed in 4 years – but it’s high time to stop ballots to Walmarts and gas stations where 67% of all the illegal ballot mills – by NGOs reside.

 

 

Jay Valentine led the team that built the TSA No-Fly List and currently runs the world’s largest election database.  Jay can be reached at Omega4America.com

The post Time Is Running Out for Republicans to Clean Up the Voter Rolls – Here’s How the GOP Can Stop the Illegal Alien Ballot Mills (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The lying ghouls in the establishment media have spent days manufacturing artificial enthusiasm for Vice President Kamala Harris.

A handful of Democrats, however, seem to realize that their new presumptive 2024 presidential nominee comes with serious problems.

According to Axios, Democratic Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, co-chair of the centrist Blue Dog Coalition, has “absolutely not” committed to supporting Harris.

Golden represents Maine’s 2nd Congressional District. In the 2020 presidential election, former President Donald Trump won that district by more than seven percentage points.

On Thursday, Golden joined five other Democrats in voting to condemn Harris’ handing of the border crisis.

Afterward, Golden told Axios that he was “going to wait and see what she puts forward and what her vision for the future of the country is.”

Axios also noted that Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of deep-red Montana has not ruled out an alternative nominee.

“We’re in the middle of the process,” Tester told reporters on Wednesday. “It’s not over yet.”

Of course, if Golden and Tester hope for a moderate “vision” from Harris, they should not hold their breath. After all, moderates have no place in a Democratic Party that has morphed into an amalgam of woke corporatism, race-based Marxism, open-borders globalism, child sacrifice and war profiteering.

Apart from her radical ideas, Harris enters the general election campaign with three major problems. In a healthy society with a free and unbiased press, any one of the three would disqualify her.

First, millions of Americans have already made up their minds about the vice president. And they find her a totally unserious person.

For instance, Wednesday on the social media platform X, Canadian author and professor Gad Saad spoke for those millions of Americans when he described Harris as “a vacuous, lobotomized, shallow, inauthentic imbecile” who “knows nothing” and “has used every non-meritocratic tool to climb the political career.”

Let me try to be as diplomatic and restrained as I can:@kamalaharris is a vacuous, lobotomized, shallow, inauthentic imbecile. She knows nothing. She has achieved nothing. She has used every non-meritocratic tool to climb the political career. She is a racist; she is… https://t.co/Gk4I4lOxaV

— Gad Saad (@GadSaad) July 25, 2024

Second, neither Harris nor her surrogates seem capable of communicating in any language other than condescension.

The vice president, of course, has a history of saying dumb things and talking down to people smarter than her.

In that respect, however, Harris has nothing on her ideological stormtroopers in the establishment media. On Tuesday, in fact, the repellent Joy Reid of MSNBC tried to manipulate black voters into supporting Harris because, Reid said, doing so would mean that they did not look crazy, weird, lonely or disconnected from the culture.

Finally, there’s a problem with dishonesty surrounding Harris.

In recent days, the establishment media has worked overtime in an attempt to rewrite history by claiming that the vice president never filled the role of “border czar.”

But social media told a different story.

Thursday on X, a devastating NewsBusters video began circulating, showing establishment media talking heads alternately referring to Harris as “border czar” and then denying it.

They cannot stop lying.

The media did this in 2016 and 2020 and they’re doing it now in 2024 for Kamala Harris.

– Report on a true story that is bad for the Democrat candidate & say it’s false.

– Debate comes, Trump will use the true topic (Border Czar) against Harris.

– Harris will then cite all the… pic.twitter.com/DefbXLwJgP

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 25, 2024

Furthermore, Harris cannot run from her complicity in Democrats’ cover-up of President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline.

Surely Golden has recognized these problems with Harris, all of which leave him and other moderate Democrats politically vulnerable.

Most other Democrats, however, seem not to have noticed. Perhaps we should wait until after Harris officially secures the nomination to give them the news.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Influential House Democrat Breaks Rank, Says He Is ‘Absolutely Not’ Committed to Kamala Harris appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Screenshot: Anton Daniels/Youtube

In a heated discussion on the latest episode of his podcast, content creator Anton Daniels confronted the troubling implications of identity politics when a guest openly admitted she would vote for Vice President Kamala Harris solely because she is a black woman.

During the episode, Paige of the Pressher Podcast said she’s voting for Kamala, saying, “I’m going to just be real honest with this. She’s a black woman.”

You could see the disappointment in the room when Paige said that she’s only voting Kamala because of identity politics.

The admission elicited an immediate reaction from Daniels, who challenged her reasoning. “Is it only because she’s a black woman?” he pressed.

Paige’s straightforward answer set the stage for a passionate rebuttal from Daniels, who laid out a litany of criticisms against Harris’s record. He pointed out the current state of the economy, ongoing border crises, and the failed policies that have plagued major cities across America because of Democrats.

Below is an excerpt from the interview:

Anton Daniels: Let me ask your question. Would you vote for [Kamala]?

Paige:  Yeah.

Anton Daniels: Why?

Paige: I’m going to just be real honest with this. She’s a black woman.

Anton Daniels: Hold on. Is it only because she’s a black woman?

Paige: Yeah.

Anton Daniels: Do you not see how that’s a bad idea?

Paige: Elaborate.

Anton Daniels: Okay, so we’re in three proxy wars with some of the most powerful leaders in the world. She failed at the border, where we have an estimation of 15 to 20 million people illegally entering this country. That is literally overtaking and bankrupting Chicago to the tune of over $400 million per year, and they are in a deficit.

Oakland is going out of business. San Francisco, ditto. California, $65 billion deficit. New York, they’re literally cutting trash collection, making them the rattiest, dirtiest city, and they’re using resources for free health care and free hotels to the tune of $600 a day. They’re literally taking over your schools, and your taxes are going to fund a migrant crisis. She was supposed to be in charge of this.

We have a failing economy. Every single day, I see people on the internet talking about $30 an hour being the new minimum wage because inflation is out of control. At one point, it was almost 10%, depending on the city. She has no policy, no record to stand on.

One of the biggest things she did in her career was lock up more black men than ever before. But we’re sitting here and voting her into office on identity politics.

The very person she served under as Vice President of the United States, she called him racist during a debate, which shows you how fake she is. The only thing we can stand on from a policy perspective is whether or not she’s black and a woman?

We did that during the Obama administration, and he didn’t do anything for black people. As a matter of fact, you all complain because the only group he really stood for was the alphabet community, and that’s his landmark achievement.

So the only thing we have to stand on is identity politics. That didn’t work with Tiffany Henyard in Dolton, Illinois. It didn’t work with Karen Bass. It didn’t work with Lori Lightfoot in Chicago. It didn’t work with Brandon Johnson, who took over her position in Chicago. It didn’t work with Andre Dickens in Atlanta. It didn’t work with Eric Adams in New York. It doesn’t work across the country. Every single Democratic city is a hellhole. And we’re still talking about identity politics?”

WATCH:

A woman who says she is going to vote for Harris because ‘she is a black woman’ gets a quick wake-up lesson. pic.twitter.com/DOrpVZ8fX9

— I Meme Therefore I Am (@ImMeme0) July 26, 2024

The post Identity Politics Backfire: Woman Supporting Kamala Harris ‘Because She is a Black Woman’ Gets Schooled with a Brutal Reality Check appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In a set of early morning posts on Friday, Barack and Michelle Obama announced their endorsement of Kamala Harris for president.

The posts featured a seemingly staged recording of the Obamas telling Harris over the phone that they are endorsing her.

The former president wrote, “Earlier this week, Michelle and I called our friend @KamalaHarris . We told her we think she’ll make a fantastic President of the United States, and that she has our full support. At this critical moment for our country, we’re going to do everything we can to make sure she wins in November. We hope you’ll join us.”

Earlier this week, Michelle and I called our friend @KamalaHarris. We told her we think she’ll make a fantastic President of the United States, and that she has our full support. At this critical moment for our country, we’re going to do everything we can to make sure she wins in… pic.twitter.com/0UIS0doIbA

— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) July 26, 2024

In the video, Obama tells Harris, “We called to say, Michelle and I couldn’t be prouder to endorse you and to do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office.”

In a separate post, uploaded simultaneously at 5:01 a.m., Michelle Obama wrote, “I’m so proud of my girl, Kamala. Barack and I are so excited to endorse her as the Democratic nominee because of her positivity, sense of humor, and ability to bring light and hope to people all across the country. We’ve got your back, @KamalaHarris !”

I’m so proud of my girl, Kamala. Barack and I are so excited to endorse her as the Democratic nominee because of her positivity, sense of humor, and ability to bring light and hope to people all across the country. We’ve got your back, @KamalaHarris! pic.twitter.com/xldcZeDXuS

— Michelle Obama (@MichelleObama) July 26, 2024

Michelle’s post included the same video.

Within the same minute, Kamala Harris also posted the video and thanked the Obamas.

It means so much to have your endorsements, @MichelleObama and @BarackObama.

Let’s get to work. pic.twitter.com/rAuTyIlCai

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) July 26, 2024

“It means so much to have your endorsements, @MichelleObama and @BarackObama,” Harris wrote. “Let’s get to work.”

The Obamas remain at the top of the most influential members of the Democrat Party.

The post WATCH: Barack and Michelle Obama Announce Endorsement of Kamala Harris with Cheesy Video appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

MSNBC recently spoke to a focus group of progressive Wisconsin voters about Kamala Harris as the Democrat nominee and the process of selecting her for the top spot.

While they did not come right out and criticize Harris as a candidate, they hardly seemed enthusiastic about the idea.

They also spoke negatively about the way the party handled the issue, behind closed doors and without any input from Democrat voters.

From Twitter/X:

MSNBC’s focus group of Wisconsin progressives did not go as planned. Democrats feel like Joe Biden harmed the Democrat party by not allowing an actual primary, and feel trepidation about Kamala Harris as the nominee:

Elise Jordan: “How do you feel about the process in which President Biden decided to not run for reeelction?”

Focus Group: “Would have been nice if he made this decision a year ago so we could have had a primary and maybe decided who we wanted to replace him rather than just all flocking to Kamala Harris.”

“By trying to clear the field and ensure that it was Biden, not allowing us to have an actual Democrat primary process.
We would have been benefited significantly if we had figured this out far sooner so there could have actually been more time to have internal debate, have internal democracy within the party.”

Watch below:

MSNBC’s focus group of Wisconsin progressives did not go as planned. Democrats feel like Joe Biden harmed the Democrat party by not allowing an actual primary, and feel trepidation about Kamala Harris as the nominee:
Elise Jordan: “How do you feel about the process in which… pic.twitter.com/xJdDLZVea9

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) July 25, 2024

Here’s more:

“I don’t like the process either. There are people behind closed doors and curtains making the decisions for us. It’s supposed to be a process. We’re supposed to be part of it. That part I don’t like on principle.” pic.twitter.com/KFYYgFd9Ru

— Eric Abbenante (@EricAbbenante) July 25, 2024

The media seems much more excited about Harris than these actual voters do. It’s very telling.

The post MSNBC Progressive Focus Group in Wisconsin Signals Tepid Support for Kamala Harris and Criticizes ‘Closed Doors’ Process of Selecting Her (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The world is very large and very old. Its many inhabitants, while not in the main very clever, have a surfeit of idiosyncrasy and cussedness, making them unruly on the best of days and baffling to the high-flying masters of the universe. Take a country of middling size—Yemen, which is back in the news this week. The Houthis, who have been menacing Red Sea shipping since the outbreak of the Israel–Gaza war, attacked Israel directly by drone last Friday; Israel retaliated with air strikes on a Yemeni port city. The Houthis vowed further direct strikes against Israel. This is an unwelcome escalatory spiral; not only does it possibly open a third(!) front for Israel, but the ongoing disruption of Red Sea traffic threatens the stability of Egypt, whose tatterdemalion economy is propped up by Suez fees. Yet it is difficult to see a way out.

It didn’t have to be this way; how we got here is almost unfathomably complicated, and better policies could have been adopted at many junctures. Yemen is the inexplicable fusion of two Cold War–era republics, one Soviet-aligned and one Arab League–aligned. (Confusingly, the former was also supported by Israel to stymie Nasser in Egypt.) The resulting state found a president-for-life ruling over a sandy shoebox full of religious and tribal factions in a byzantine ecosystem of interlocking mutual beeves. One of these factions was the Shi’ite Houthis. The Houthis had it in for the president, whom they accused of being a corrupt puppet for the Saudis and the Americans. Tacitly conceding the point, the president threw the Houthis’ leader into jail in 2003, where he died, which did not improve the group’s attitude. In 2011, amid the broader regional unrest of the Arab Spring, various Yemeni discontents, Houthis included, took the opportunity to air their grievances, can the president, and cook up a new political settlement. As happened in every Arab Spring arena, liberal rhetoric swiftly flew out the window to make way for naked power-grabs by force of arms.

The Houthis are an unpleasant gang of ugly ideologues who have little use for (among other things) liberal democracy, America, or the Jews. As the press will never let you forget, they draw support from Iran. (“Iran-backed” is one of the better vague but obligatory epithets like “hardline” and “far-right.”) They also control Yemen’s formal capital, Sana’a,  and most of the territory that constituted the former Yemen Arab Republic, one of the two precursor states for the modern unified Republic of Yemen. (In an echo of Afghanistan’s ironies, this makes the formerly communist portion of the country the Western-backed agonist.) 

This is not a particularly new development; they have been in the catbird seat for about a decade, despite the heroic efforts of our favorite Middle Eastern despots. The tender ministrations of the Saudis and the Jordanians have not dislodged the Houthis, but they have caused a years-long on-and-off famine and widespread misery by annihilating much of Yemen’s civilian infrastructure.

I am afraid that, when a gang of thugs with all the guns takes control of the capital and the surrounding third of the country and refuses to leave, we have a name for it: a government. You have two tools for getting foreign governments to do what you want, diplomacy and war. After ten years and change, it is fair to say that war has been found wanting. Novel half-measures like calling the Houthis terrorists haven’t done much to get everyone onside (but they have kept the State Department’s deputy undersecretary for immiserating foreign peoples busy, so it’s not completely a wash). 

That leaves diplomacy. In these ugly peripheral proxy wars, there are two courses of action when your horse fails to win the race. You can try to do down your opponent in anticipation of the presumed next round of conflict; this is the tack we have taken toward North Korea. Or you can work out a modus vivendi with the full spectrum of normal diplomatic relations; this is the tack we have taken toward communist Vietnam. One of these approaches has given us a hostile, fortified nuclear power that happily operates against American interests. The other has yielded a stable, non-aligned power that operates as a counterweight to overtly hostile interests in the neighborhood. Nobody thinks Vietnam is a special friend to America, but it is a normal nation among normal nations. That is better than another Hermit Kingdom. 

A settlement in Yemen seems unlikely while the war in Israel-Palestine is still going—another incentive to finish up that war. Americans and Western Europeans have a strong interest in keeping the sea lanes open, and it seems unlikely that yet more questionably legal American bombing is going to stop the Houthis’ Red Sea operations. Rather than dealing out more force, perhaps the masters of the universe should try cutting deals for a change.

The post Is It Too Late for Diplomacy in Yemen? appeared first on The American Conservative.

Hope is a hell of a drug. 

Since Sunday, the U.S. vice president turned presumptive Democratic nominee for president, Kamala Devi Harris, has been treated to a political honeymoon so intense, so adoring that it recalls—and perhaps exceeds—the gushing press a young Illinoisan senator named Barack Obama received after his 2004 DNC speech in Boston.

The enthusiasm with which Democratic partisans have reacted to the news of Biden’s departure from the race is understandable enough. After a rough month, beginning with the disastrous June 27 debate, followed shortly by Trump’s surprisingly courageous reaction after nearly having his head blown off on July 13, and a largely successful, at times entertaining (thank you, Terry Bollea) RNC in Milwaukee, the Democrats were in need of something, anything to shift the narrative away from that of impending electoral disaster. And thanks to the surprisingly selfless and patriotic decision by President Joe Biden to drop out, that is what they got.

And yet. 

For all the happy talk, Democrats must be (or should be) wondering, deep within the recesses of their collective psyches, Will we be getting the Harris of History or the Harris of our Imaginations? 

Because one is radically different from the other. 

This week, in what was supposed to be a kind of “gotcha” moment for the Trump campaign, it was revealed that in 2011 Harris’s campaign for California Attorney General received a check for $6,000 from a New York real estate developer named Donald J. Trump.

But from the standpoint of progressive Democrats, would this not raise questions about Harris’s own politics? She did, after all, cash it. The interesting (or worrying, as the case may be) question for progressive Democrats is: Why did Harris appeal to donors such as Trump? That one is easy enough. Harris, then, and really up until the moment the George Floyd rioters set Minneapolis (and dozens of other American cities) ablaze, presented herself as a “tough-on-crime” prosecutor, one who bragged about jailing the parents of truant California schoolchildren.

Harris is now said to represent the best the Democratic Party has to offer—and that she will give Trump a real fight for the White House. Yet her shambolic 2020 presidential campaign tells a different story. Harris, who won a grand total of zero primary delegates, was also roundly humiliated on the debate stage by a young congresswoman from Hawaii, Tulsi Gabbard.

Once in office, Harris’s office was plagued by staff turnover and she gained a reputation for treating staff badly. So the question arises: If she can’t manage a smallish vice presidential staff in the EEOB (the Office of the Vice President employs approximately 100 people), why assume she will be able to manage the country?

And then there is the matter of foreign policy.

Progressive Democrats (with the exception, notably, of the Palestinian-American Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan) immediately jumped on the Harris bandwagon—one they were unwilling to even consider in 2020 while their erstwhile champion Bernie Sanders was in the ring. Now, it seems, thanks to what is thought to be Harris’s identitarian appeal, they are “all in” and in the process wasting little time in deluding themselves as to what a Harris presidency might bring.

“With a President Harris,”  one anonymous national security official told POLITICO this week, “a two-state solution may finally be possible.” 

O-kay.

Even if the two state solution weren’t as dead as doornail, the above assumes Harris possesses a measure of statesmanship that has otherwise been kept under lock and key, hidden deep from public view for the entirety of her career.

An examination of Harris’s foreign policy record provides ample evidence that she is a standard issue liberal interventionist in the mold of the troika of Obama-era “Valkyries”: Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, and Samantha Power. To be fair, as a U.S. senator, she did, as the estimable Daniel Larison points out, oppose Trump’s scrapping of both the Iranian nuclear accord and the landmark INF treaty, but that opposition might also be chalked up to partisan politics. 

Indeed, as the Progressive magazine noted shortly after she joined the Democratic ticket in 2020, 

Instead of offering a progressive alternative, Harris often attacks Trump from the right, criticizing him for cozying up to leaders in North Korea, Russia, and China.

It would be safe to expect more of the same. The coming campaign will probably feature more Russia-related smears aimed in Trump’s direction, while Harris will don the mantle of “Protectress of the U.S. National Security State.” Indeed, someone with Harris’s limitations makes her the perfect cipher for the “Deep State Democrats” who run the Democratic party.

A President Harris—should that eventuality come to pass—will not provide the country with a much needed respite from hegemonic weltanschauung of the current administration. 

She will only prolong it.  

The post A Tale of Two Kamalas appeared first on The American Conservative.

Now that Old Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race due to his ailing mental state, Democrats are proposing more debates against President Donald Trump.

Donald Trump already knocked one Democrat candidate out of the race. He now has an opportunity to take out their next candidate.

But Trump is not so eager to make plans to debate Miss Word Salad Kamala Harris. He’s not even sure she will be the Democrat candidate!

The Trump campaign released a statement on Thursday that was one for the history books.

Responding to the scheduling of a future debate, the Trump camp said this:

“Given the continued political chaos surrounding Crooked Joe Biden and the Democrat Party, general election debate details cannot be finalized until Democrats formally decide on their nominee. There is a strong sense by many in the Democrat Party – namely Barack Hussein Obama – that Kamala Harris is a Marxist fraud who cannot beat President Trump, and they are still holding out for someone “better.” Therefore, it would be inappropriate to schedule things with Harris because Democrats very well could still change their minds.”

That was just Epic!

The post Trump Crushes Democrats on Future Debate Schedule: “There Is a Strong Sense by Many in Democrat Party – Namely Barack Hussein Obama – That Kamala Harris is a Marxist Fraud” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Members of the liberal media have been positively giddy for three days, thinking that now that they’ve rid themselves of Joe Biden that Kamala Harris is going to rescue Democrats in the 2024 election.

New polling from Emerson College suggests that isn’t true at all.

Trump still leads in all of the swing states. The only place where Kamala has shown any pull is Wisconsin and Emerson polling finds that state is a tie.

From Emerson College Polling:

July 2024 Swing State Polls: Harris Trails Trump in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Tied in Wisconsin

New Emerson College Polling/The Hill polling in five swing states finds Vice President Kamala Harris trailing former President Donald Trump in four states, and tied in Wisconsin. In Arizona, 49% support Trump and 44% support Harris. In Georgia, 48% support Trump and 46% Harris. In Michigan, 46% support Trump and 45% Harris. In Pennsylvania, 48% support Trump and 46% Harris. In Wisconsin, 47% support Harris and Trump respectively…

“Harris has recovered a portion of the vote for the Democrats on the presidential ticket since the fallout after the June 27 debate,” Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, said. “Harris’ numbers now reflect similar support levels to those of Biden back in March.”

Hot Air notes that Trump’s numbers are also improving:

Harris might not be the only one improving. RCP doesn’t have aggregation yet on battleground polling for Trump v Harris, but their Trump v Biden aggregation numbers are still up. In each of these states, Trump’s Emerson numbers are the same or better in each state than the RCP aggregate averages against Biden. Harris isn’t taking votes away from Trump, but just picking up voters that left Biden — and may not be all that enthusiastic about Harris once she has to directly compete on the campaign trail.

See more numbers below:

2024 GE: @EmersonPolling

PENNSYLVANIA
Trump: 48% (+5)
Biden: 43%
—
WISCONSIN
Trump: 48% (+5)
Biden: 43%
—
MICHIGAN
Trump: 45% (+3)
Biden: 42%
—
ARIZONA
Trump: 47% (+7)
Biden: 40%
—
GEORGIA
Trump: 47% (+6)
Biden: 41%
—
NEVADA
Trump: 46%… pic.twitter.com/Tb0f0wrcWi

— InteractivePolls (@IAPolls2022) July 18, 2024

This is Kamala’s supposed ‘honeymoon’ phase. Wait another week or two after people have had a chance to hear more from her.

The post New Polling Finds Kamala Harris Hasn’t Moved the Needle Much – Trump Still Leads in Swing States appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Kamala Harris campaign has hired Brian Fallon as their new comms director. Fallon was previously a spokesman for the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign.

After Hillary lost the 2016 election, Fallon went to work for a far left activist group called Demand Justice which seeks to pack the United States Supreme Court.

He has also tweeted support for defunding the police.

In other words, he will fit right in at Kamala’s campaign.

Breitbart News reports:

Kamala Harris Comms Director Previously Called to ‘Defund the Police’

Brian Fallon, the new Communications Director for Vice President Kamala Harris as she gears up for the presidential nomination, previously called to “Defund the Police.”

Fallon, whose bio on X now says, “Harris for President,” previously wrote in 2020, following the Black Lives Matter (BLM) riots, that the police should be defunded.

It remains unclear if he has since changed his position on that issue, which became wildly unpopular with Democrat and Republican voters.

Defund the police

— Brian Fallon (@brianefallon) June 4, 2020

Brian Fallon, formerly of the Clinton campaign, now comms director of the Harris campaign. pic.twitter.com/MBDiCOWQBW

— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) July 26, 2024

The Washington Free Beacon has more:

Vice President Kamala Harris’s latest hire has called for elderly public officials to step down and once mocked President Joe Biden for “trying to complete an answer” during a political debate.

Fallon’s résumé includes stints as spokesman for Hillary Clinton’s ill-fated 2016 presidential bid and as head of Demand Justice, an activist group behind the movement to expand the Supreme Court.

Fallon has a history of comments that could prove awkward for his boss’s boss. At Demand Justice, he spearheaded a campaign to pressure then-Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer to retire because of Breyer’s advanced age. A longtime Harris cheerleader, Fallon slammed Biden during a 2019 Democratic debate, writing on X, formerly Twitter, that “Biden trying to complete an answer is a tender moment,” and criticizing Biden for his past collaboration with segregationists.

Defunding the police has been a disaster for numerous American cities.

Harris is going to have to answer for her support of that awful idea at some point.

The post New Comms Director for Kamala Harris Campaign Wants to Pack the Supreme Court and Defund the Police appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.