Leftist Director Oliver Stone Slams Dems for Lying Russiagate Attack on Trump

Oliver Stone testifies at House hearing on JFK files/Video screenshot.

Last week, left-wing movie director Oliver Stone was in Washington, DC, to testify to Congress regarding the JFK assassination files.

Stone’s 1991 political thriller, JFK, explores the investigation of Jim Garrison into the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The film challenges the official Warren Commission report and suggests a conspiracy involving the CIA, the military-industrial complex, and then Vice President Lyndon Johnson.

While in DC, a reporter asked Stone if he was surprised that the public does not know more about the assassination attempt against President Trump and would-be assassin Thomas Crooks.

Stone answered, “I’m surprised we don’t. Yeah, I don’t know much about him. I mean, they have not done their homework.”

“They’re not reporting it.  I would like to know more. Certainly, the parents and history….”  he trailed off.

The reporter then pressed Stone about Russiagate.

“And do you think President Trump wanting to take on the FBI, the CIA, the Intelligence agencies is a good move after what happened to him with the Russia probe and all that?”

Stone responded, “Yeah.  Look at Russiagate. We paid for it.  Russiagate was the result and he’s got….I applaud that. And I hate what they did with Russiagate, I really do.”

“I think it’s, again, the lying, lying, lying…and selling that to the American people.”

“And the whole thing with hating Russia is so negative. It’s so un-American.”

To close the conversation, the reporter then asked, “My last one for you would just be, do you think Trump is right when he says there’s a weaponization against conservatives specifically.”

“Absolutely…there was.”

Stone then went on to add, however, that he does not like Trump going after “anti-Semitic” news.

Watch:

You can watch the full hearing here:

Despite Stone’s career in woke Hollywood, he has produced some thought-provoking films, including the documentary “A Good American.”

A Good American highlights brilliant cryptologist Bill Binney, a former intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA).

Binney built a sophisticated surveillance program, ThinThread, for gathering data capable of providing clues, in real-time, of potential terrorist threats and Americans.

The program included built-in safeguards that would have prevented the massive surveillance methods that were later exposed by Edward Snowden, but was killed off by NSA management, adding to ongoing concerns about what the real focus of governmental agencies actually is.

View the trailer below.

The post Leftist Director Oliver Stone Slams Dems for Lying Russiagate Attack on Trump appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

UK DYSTOPIA: Pro-Life Activist Convicted for Standing Outside Abortion Clinic – Case Criticized by VP Vance and US State Department – May Have ‘Diplomatic Implications’

Pro-life activist Livia Tossici-Bolt.

Under unpopular Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the United Kingdom continues to devolve into a censorship state devoted to the Globalist agenda.

The examples abound, but this week, a court decision put the issue of the transatlantic relationship with Donald J. Trump’s United States in the spotlight.

A pro-life activist was found guilty on Friday (4) of breaching an order banning protests outside an abortion clinic in southern England.

Reuters reported:

“Livia Tossici-Bolt, 64, the leader of a branch of U.S. Christian group ’40 Days for Life’, was prosecuted for breaching a “safe zone” in the immediate area around the abortion clinic in the southern town of Bournemouth on two days in March 2023. She was holding a sign that read “Here to talk, if you want”.

The case comes amid growing accusations in the U.S. of infringements on free speech in Britain. U.S. Vice-President JD Vance confronted Prime Minister Keir Starmer face to face at the White House on the issue, and said in February he feared free speech in Britain was ‘in retreat’.”

US Vice President JD Vance has alerted that free speech in Britain was ‘in retreat’, and famously confronted Starmer at the White House on the issue.

The U.S. State Department’s DRL (Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor) department weighed on the UK court’s decision, taking the case to the UK headlines, with analysts fearing ‘it could have diplomatic implications’ on the ongoing trade deal negotiations.

We are disappointed with the UK court’s conviction of Livia Tossici-Bolt for violating a designated “buffer zone” at an abortion clinic. Freedom of expression must be protected for all. https://t.co/hY012sYVji

— State Dept: Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor (DRL) (@StateDRL) April 4, 2025

Utterly appalling. A UK judge has convicted British retiree Livia Tossici-Bolt, ordering her to pay £20,000 for holding this sign in a public place.

The US @StateDept was right: the UK is egregiously punishing a Christian for free speech. pic.twitter.com/9bErOJh0F0

— Kristen Waggoner (@KristenWaggoner) April 4, 2025

“Tossici-Bolt was taken to court after refusing to pay a fixed fine for breaching an order that has banned protests in an area around the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) clinic since 2022 over concerns that women who attended were being subjected to harassment and intimidation.

Following a trial last month, Judge Orla Austin convicted Tossici-Bolt at Poole Magistrates’ Court on Friday of breaching the order, saying the activist was not lawfully exercising her right to freedom of expression.

Tossici-Bolt was given a conditional discharge, meaning she must not commit further offences for two years, and was ordered to pay 20,000 pounds ($26,028) in legal costs.”

Watch: Livia Tossici-Bolt reacts to her verdict.

WATCH: In her own words, Livia Tossici-Bolt reacts to her ‘guilty’ verdict

A retiree convicted for offering consensual conversation.

This is the UK’s crisis of free speech personified. pic.twitter.com/tqEbaODGOm

— ADF International (@ADFIntl) April 5, 2025

Read more:

ICYMI: Here’s Vice President J.D. Vance’s Full Speech on Free Speech and Tyrannical Censorship That Sent European Elites Into a Total Meltdown at the Munich Security Conference (FULL TRANSCRIPT)

The post UK DYSTOPIA: Pro-Life Activist Convicted for Standing Outside Abortion Clinic – Case Criticized by VP Vance and US State Department – May Have ‘Diplomatic Implications’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Tehran Backed Terror: Israel Defense Minister Katz Reveals Letters Alleging Iran Provided Financial Support to Hamas for October 7 Terrorist Attacks

Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz/ Image: @Israel_katz/X

On Sunday, Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz revealed what he calls “conclusive evidence” of Iran’s support for Hamas’ for the October 7 terrorist attacks as well as a broader plan to help the terrorist group “destroy Israel” through intercepted communications between Tehran and slain Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Mohammed Deif.

The document was intercepted by Israeli soldiers during the invasion of Gaza and sent to the IDF intelligence Catalogue unit.

During remarks to IDF’s intelligence unit for Technical Collection and Analysis (AMSHAT), Katz claimed Sinwar and Deif asked for $500 million from Iran’s Quds Force commander sometime before October 7. The funds would embolden Hamas’ efforts to “annihilate Israel and confront the United States.”

According to Katz, that request was granted.

Per The Jerusalem Post:

Katz said that Izadi said he would approve the terror financing assistance despite Tehran being under financial strain and sanctions because of the supreme importance of embracing conflict against Israel and the US.

He added that the world must realize that Iran is “the head of the snake” which has directed the malign activities of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and terror groups in Syria and Iraq.

Despite the develation, Israeli intelligence has said Iran did not know the exact timing or plans of the October 7 invasion, but rather has focused on the idea that Hamas could not have pulled off the without IRGC training, weapons, and funding.

Katz shared on X, “During my visit today to the IDF intelligence unit, I revealed a classified document found in senior Hamas tunnels in Gaza. It proves direct ties between Iran and Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Mohammed Deif — and Iran’s support for Hamas’s plan to destroy Israel and for the October 7 massacre.”

“In the document, Hamas demands $500 million from the IRGC’s Quds Force to fund Israel’s destruction.”

“Izadi, head of the IRGC’s Palestinian department, replies that despite Iran’s economic crisis and the suffering of its people, Tehran will continue financing Hamas — because fighting Israel and the U.S. is the regime’s top priority.”

“The conclusion is clear: Iran is the head of the snake.”

“Despite its denials, Iran is actively funding and fueling terror across all fronts — from Gaza and Lebanon to Syria, Judea & Samaria, and the Houthis in Yemen — under the banner of destroying Israel.”

“Israel will do whatever it takes to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and will continue striking its terror proxies until the Iranian axis of evil is dismantled.”

During my visit today to the IDF intelligence unit, I revealed a classified document found in senior Hamas tunnels in Gaza. It proves direct ties between Iran and Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Mohammed Deif — and Iran’s support for Hamas’s plan to destroy Israel and for the… pic.twitter.com/HEYCnGAZvo

— ישראל כ”ץ Israel Katz (@Israel_katz) April 6, 2025

The post Tehran Backed Terror: Israel Defense Minister Katz Reveals Letters Alleging Iran Provided Financial Support to Hamas for October 7 Terrorist Attacks appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Supreme Court’s Confidence Game: The Lie of “Judicial Supremacy”: The Theft of Power and Control From “We the People”

Book cover (front and back)

Since President Trump’s resounding election victory and inauguration, RADICAL leftist U.S. District Court Judges have produced a deluge of stays, preliminary injunctions, and other orders designed to reverse his election victory and neuter his Presidency.

These judges were handpicked by leftist Presidents because they would instantly violate their oath of office and make claims of judicial supremacy that violate the U.S. Constitution.

These judges have fraudulently exceeded their judicial power which only extends to cases in “Law and Equity” arising under our Constitution.

They have usurped and infringed on the Executive power of the President who is the only person vested in the Constitution to manage the United States of America.

These unethical justices, for instance, entered orders blocking the executive power of the President to dismantle USAID and its fraudulent programs, stopping deportations under established law, the Alien Enemies Act, and stopping DOGE’s review of Social Security records, among many others. The unconstitutional judicial goal here is to vitiate President Trump’s and America’s election victory.

The assumed constitutional power behind these orders inevitably traces back to the 1803 Supreme Court case known as Marbury v. Madison.

Most lawyers were taught in law school that the case stands for the proposition that the courts may determine the constitutionality of a statute or action by the government and issue an order remedying any violation—and that the courts claiming “Supremacy” have the last word on the matter!

This unconstitutionally places the Judicial Branch in a dictatorial position over the Executive and Legislative Branches of America’s government. Like the Left’s “generally accepted science of global warming,” the fact that a proposition is generally accepted does not mean it is correct.

U.S. courts do not have the enforceable constitutional power to require the Executive, a separate branch of government, to do or not do anything! They especially do not have the power to force the executive to abide by any unconstitutional order.

The Judicial Branch’s real authority is like that of a baseball referee who calls a foul ball, but the judicial referee cannot enforce the call. The truth is that the Judicial Branch cannot enforce its decisions or make laws.

The branch merely has judgment and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the Executive Branch even for the enforcement of its judgments.

The Judicial Branch’s only function is to adjudicate cases or controversies and decide if they are lawful within the framework of the law and the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. Constitution, written by We the People, rules all courts just as it rules the Legislature, and other departments such as the President and state governors.

James Madison warned in the Federalist Number 47 “The cumulation of all powers, Legislative, Executive and Judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” This is where we are today, living under JUDICIAL TYRANY.

America’s Congress has the constitutional duty and power to check and counterbalance the courts, and they have been totally negligent. To roll back this judicial overreach, Congress must exercise their power over the courts, or else they violate their oath of office.

There is no longer any room to perch on the fence. The Executive and Legislative Branches of government must either exercise their constitutional duty or knowingly aid and abet the destruction of our Republic for which we stand.

The U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of every state restrict the judicial branch from making laws and enforcing their decisions.

For this reason, lawmaking is given only to the elected representatives of the people, and enforcing those laws is the duty of the Executive Branch of government. If this were not true, America would not be a Republican form of government, it would be a judicial dictatorship.

Thankfully, we have a Republican form of government, and for it to function smoothly each branch must operate within its constitutional authority thereby coordinating with the other branches.

The Constitution for the United States of America at Article 1 establishes Congress, Section 8 authorizing Congress to create courts inferior to the Supreme Court.

Article 2 establishes the Executive Branch, Section 4 stating that all civil officers may be removed by impeachment and defines the basis for impeachment.

Article 3 establishes the Judicial Branch and states at Section 1 that judges may hold their office during “good Behavior”, which is an additional ground for impeachment beyond the terms which apply to others.

Article 6 defines the Constitution and laws made pursuant to it as the supreme law of the land and requires that government officers be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution.

As we all know, the Constitution assigns the law-making function to the Congress, with the President’s agreement (Article 1); the administrative function to the President (Article 2); and the judicial function to the courts (Article 3). Congress holds the sole power to impeach.

The restraint upon this power, and it is a major restraint, is that the House must vote to impeach, and then a 2/3 majority of the Senate is required to convict.

The President has no role in an impeachment (unless he is the target) and is specifically prohibited from granting a reprieve or pardon which applies to an impeachment.

The Constitution, then, is detailed concerning all matters it addresses and is the ultimate final authority.

While judicial review of the constitutionality of a statute was recognized at the time the Constitution was adopted, there is nothing in the Constitution which provides the courts with the authority to issue an order, stay or injunction directed at the Executive Branch.

The courts have no constitutional authority to require or force the President and his administration to do anything. Thomas Jefferson wrote “to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions: a very dangerous doctrine indeed and one which would place us under the despotism of an Oligarchy.”

The Constitution at Article 2. Section 1 states: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”

The Constitution does not install the judiciary as a co-pilot or co-President, so the judiciary has no power to review the President’s exercise of his executive power.

Even so, given the current situation, President Trump needs to do nothing more than IGNORE orders of the courts. Constitutionally, the courts depend upon the President to enforce their orders.

If, after analyzing such order the President determines such order to violate the Constitution, having sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, he is duty bound to ignore such order

It is critical for all Americans to understand this information about our Constitution and how it applies to what we are seeing unfold in front of us in real time. President Trump is fulfilling his promises to the American people.

He must ignore the judicial insurrection with its unconstitutional orders. It is also time for our congressmen and women to enforce their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

For a more complete analysis of how America finds itself in its current mess and a look at the possible endgame, check out our book: The Supreme Court’s Confidence Game: The Lie of “Judicial Supremacy” on Amazon for only $15. Click HERE.

You will be truly amazed!

About the Authors:

David Howard served Montana in the House of Representatives and Montana Senate from 2009 to 2022. He is a minister, and founder of Foxhole Ministry with a national radio program The Voice of Truth’s Wake-up Call. He is also the author of The Silent Church is Watching America Die, The Christian Art of Verbal Chess, and Attack on Christian­ity subtitled 10 Strategies Christ Used to Fight the Culture War. David is a Vietnam veteran, former FBI agent, and an authori­ty on crime and workplace violence prevention. David is married to Carla, and they have six daughters and eigh­teen grandchildren.

He can be reached at: SenDavidHoward@gmail.com

James Rigby, Attorney at Law, practiced bankruptcy law in Seattle, Washington from 1980 through 2020 and he is now retired from the practice of law. His family has made Montana their home since 2014, where he and his wife homeschool their two daughters.

He can be reached at: James@RigbyLawFirm.com.

The post The Supreme Court’s Confidence Game: The Lie of “Judicial Supremacy”: The Theft of Power and Control From “We the People” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Tampon Tim Walz Gets Savagely Roasted When Viewers Notice His Reaction to a Key Democrat Union’s Glowing Statement in Support of Trump’s Tariffs (VIDEO)

Credit: CNN screenshot

Tampon Tim Walz was unhappy on Sunday when confronted with the fact that one of the Democrats’ biggest unions has sided with Trump on tariffs.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday the implementation of a 10% baseline tariff on all imports, effective April 5, 2025. The worst offenders will be hit with even tougher measures on April 9.

Speaking from the White House Rose Garden, President Trump proclaimed April 2 as “Liberation Day,” marking a new era of economic independence. He emphasized that this measure is essential to protect American jobs and revitalize domestic manufacturing.

The White House also released a detailed chart showing how badly many countries have been ripping off American workers, charging high tariffs on U.S. goods while benefiting from America’s generosity in return.

Far-left CNN host Jake Tapper brought Walz on to discuss the impact that the tariffs have had on his home state. But during their discussion, Tapper dropped this mini-bombshell

It turns out the United Auto Workers, a reliable Democrat ally, is bucking the party and going all in with President Trump.

“President Trump argues that these tariffs are needed to bring American manufacturing back and to help American workers left behind in places like Minnesota, Tapper said. “He has support from the UAW. The UAW called his auto tariffs — quote — “a long-overdue shift away from a harmful economic framework that has devastated the working class.”

“It signals a return to policies that prioritize the workers who build this country, rather than the greed of ruthless corporations” — unquote,” Tapper added. “I have to say that sounds a lot like language you would use. What do you say to the UAW?”

Walz looked utterly shocked when confronted with this news.

WATCH:

CNN: President Trump has support from the UAW, which “called his auto tariffs ‘a long overdue shift away from a harmful economic framework that has devastated the working class.’” pic.twitter.com/mth8igKDh8

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 6, 2025

X users, including the Trump War Room account, proceeded to roast Walz, with many noting that believing he was on the verge of tears:

Lmao. Tim Walz looks like he’s going to cry as Tapper reads the United Auto Workers’ statement in support of Trump’s tariffs. pic.twitter.com/BGcOgnzPDZ

— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) April 6, 2025

Tim Walz looks like he is going to cry https://t.co/G2pCCYvNtb

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) April 6, 2025

Tampon Tim has a resting cry face

— VMAC (@realVMAC1) April 6, 2025

The face you make when the union you thought was in your pocket turns around and backs Trump.

Priceless.

Popcorn-worthy meltdown incoming.

— Founding Unit (@FoundingUnit) April 6, 2025

Biden isn’t the only politician to shit himself on tv.

— MFWIC (@i_publius1788) April 6, 2025

He always looks confused. Poor Tampon Timmy.

— Riley (@MrJokerCPoC) April 6, 2025

Probably realized he didn’t change his Tampon fast enough

— Sonnyz1993 (@MusicCityYankee) April 6, 2025

The post Tampon Tim Walz Gets Savagely Roasted When Viewers Notice His Reaction to a Key Democrat Union’s Glowing Statement in Support of Trump’s Tariffs (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Far-Left Race-Obsessed Elie Mystal Says All Laws Before 1965 Should Be ‘Presumptively Unconstitutional’: “Why Should I Give About Some Law That Some Old White Man Passed”

Elie Mystal/Image” Video screenshot ‘The View’

Far-left race-obsessed pundit Elie Mystal recently appeared on “The View” to promote his new book “Bad Law.”

Mystal went on to bizarrely suggest that every law passed before 1964 should be eliminated.

The suggestion came after co-host Sunny Hostin mentioned the Immigration and Nationality Act that the Trump administration is using to revoke the visas of some foreign students who have participated in violent terrorist-supporting anti-Israel college campuses across the country.

Sunny Hostin: One of the laws you write about is playing out right now, the Immigration and Nationality Act. Now, this administration is using this statute to justify the detentions and possible deportations, actually, of visa and green card holders who they seem to deem a threat to US foreign policy.

What do you make of the administration’s use of the act?

More broadly, is Trump really setting up a First Amendment showdown, which is what Whoopie has been talking about?

Elie Mystal: Yes, absolutely. One of my premises for the book is that every law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumptively unconstitutional.

Because before the 1965 Voting Rights Act, we were functionally an Apartheid country. Not everybody who lived here could vote here.

Why should I give (blank) about some law that some old white man passed in the 1920s?

Watch:

On The View, far-left extremist Elie Mystal shouts: “[E]very law passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be presumptively unconstitutional because…we were functionally an apartheid country!”
The Bill of Rights and most laws prohibiting murder were passed long before… pic.twitter.com/qKhpj2lEiC

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) April 1, 2025

During an appearance on ‘The Breakfast Club’ podcast, Mystal showed his hate, not just for America’s laws, but also for our founding document.  He suggested we should “replace our piece of crap Constitution.”

Elie Mystal: “We should replace our piece of crap Constitution, like in South Africa” pic.twitter.com/bslA6BNaYy

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) April 4, 2025

The post Far-Left Race-Obsessed Elie Mystal Says All Laws Before 1965 Should Be ‘Presumptively Unconstitutional’: “Why Should I Give About Some Law That Some Old White Man Passed” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

DREAM: A Film That Funds Real-World Child Rescues

Credit: Dream

Dream is a supernatural thriller that delves into the harrowing reality of child trafficking in the United States.

Inspired by true rescue, the story shines a light on the anguish endured by victims and their families.

Credit: DREAM

From the producer:

Against all odds, we’re making DREAM—a gritty, emotional feature about child trafficking in America that will directly fund real rescues.

This isn’t just a movie. It’s a mission.

DREAM was born from an actual dream. Weeks later, it came true. A young girl—previously rescued from trafficking, then tragically re-trafficked—was found again after we connected a rescue org with people who could locate her. That miracle became the heartbeat of this film.

Now, we’re bringing DREAM to the screen—with the help of people who believe in it as much as we do:

Cameron Hanes. Ryan Sheckler. Michael Flaherty (I Can Only Imagine, Chronicles of Narnia). Samuel Rodriguez (Flamin’ Hot, Breakthrough). Brian Rogers (Godzilla franchise).

These aren’t just names. They’re allies in a fight that matters.

The Reality We’re Fighting

An estimated 100,000–300,000 children are at risk of exploitation in the U.S. each year
The average age of entry into sex trafficking is just 12–14 years old
Online recruitment has increased by 125% in recent years, largely due to social media and gaming platforms
Many victims are trafficked by someone they know—a family member, coach, or friend
The U.S. is one of the top destinations and sources for child trafficking worldwide

These aren’t distant issues. They’re happening in our neighborhoods, right now.

What DREAM Does Differently

We’re not just raising awareness—we’re creating a revenue engine that will fund direct rescue missions across the U.S. in partnership with Answer International and other frontline organizations.

Watch the trailer:

Every dollar you give helps us finish the film—and once it’s released, proceeds will help fund actual operations to locate, recover, and restore children who are being trafficked.

This is more than storytelling.

It’s warfare on behalf of the voiceless.

Right now, there’s a child praying that someone shows up.

You can be that someone.

Join the mission. Fuel the rescue. Help us make this DREAM a reality.
[restore7.org/dream]

The post DREAM: A Film That Funds Real-World Child Rescues appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

World War G: Trump’s Tariffs Aren’t Just Economics — They’re America’s Frontline Defense in the Globalist-Communist Hybrid War

Credit: The White House

The reaction from the Left to President Donald Trump’s new tariff regime has been predictable. Like everything he does, this too will kill us all. Somehow.

It’s disturbing to see how many on the right are either in agreement with this knee jerk Leftist invective or express varying degrees of confusion. Some like this article from PJ Media seem to be hedging. The tariffs might work or they might not, they say:

“Being a wartime president is a high wire act. The PR battles matter greatly because your capacity to fight is limited by the electorate’s stomach for the mission. If you can’t sell the war, you’re probably not going to win it.

But all the cool, crafty PR tricks won’t mean a lick if your troops get their [tushies] kicked on the battlefield. War is a reality-based enterprise. You can’t bull[EXPLETIVE] your way to victory.”

I get it. There’s a risk to this strategy. There’s a risk to every strategy, however. And what’s interesting about this editorial is the writer has hit very close to the mark by characterizing Trump as a “wartime” president. Though in the writer’s mind the “war” in question is a figurative trade war and not an actual war. A war war.

It’s not a trade war. It’s not figurative at all. This is war.

And we as a country have a very big problem if we haven’t figured this out by now. The People’s Republic of China has been waging what it calls “hybrid war” against our country for more than a decade.

That’s not the terminology used by China experts at some think tank or policy mavens in some Ivy League panel. China, that big land mass teeming with people just across the Pacific Ocean, calls it “hybrid war.” And they are waging that war specifically against the United States. Against us.

Hybrid war isn’t just an aggressive term the Chinese use to describe their trade policy. According to Col. John Mills, hybrid war is a form of warfare (not bartering) that fuses the military with the civilian. A strategy that is easy for China to implement because they are Communist and the state legally holds controlling shares in all its corporations. Every business entity is also a potential military entity. All of which can be bent towards the will of the Chinese state.

And they are. Not for mere financial gain. For war. Against us.

What does that mean?

It means they are actively working to destroy our culture, our government, our institutions, and our freedoms. And for a while there during the Biden administration, I wouldn’t have been surprised at all if the Stars and Stripes had been taken down in DC to be replaced by the red flag of Maoist China. It would’ve seemed somehow more fitting seeing as at the time, I was a jailed political dissident looking out on that same city from the DC prison.

But this is not the only conflict we are facing. We are also locked in a struggle with the West to save the West.

Kyle Shideler at the American Mind also invokes the concept of war when he talks about this in his article Cold Civil War Gone Global. The clunky phrasing parses together all the aspects of this conflict. It is a kind of civil war and it is also a cold war. And, for good measure, it’s gone global.

Shideler sees the outline of the conflict. America is locked in a kind of civil cold war which he describes as the increasingly volatile tensions between the “ruling class” and the “country class.” And when you see how the American ruling class is continually aided by, and aids, the ruling classes of European nations, our supposed allies, you have no choice but to interpret this collaboration as the awful unity that it is.

If British intelligence can help our CIA and FBI implement the Russiagate hoax, and if our USAID dollars prop up gatekeeper institutions like the BBC or Australian universities, then we are fools if we don’t conclude that the little plastic flags on the desks of those at MI5 and the CIA belie the fact that they are actually all on a single team that has nothing to do with their respective nation states. Or us, the citizens of those states.

If that sounds like an accusation of disloyalty or treason to you, that’s because it is. It means those unelected bureaucrats running the government show in DC have more common in with their counterparts in London or Brussels than they do with you and me here in the middle of suburban America.

They are part of a class of self-styled supra-national elites made delusional by their egos and thirst for money and power. They imagine themselves overlords of increasingly larger swaths of the planet.

They include among their ranks not just faceless power-mad in government but also members of the WEF, those in multinational corporations, financial institutions, “non-government” organizations, and other institutions like those of faith, education, and medicine.

The outlines of this transnational cabal have been blatant since the Covid days when countries around the world uniformly instituted lock downs of their citizenry, turning a trip to the grocery store into a government-controlled privilege as they tightened the screws of draconian vaccine mandates.

It was not just America where this happened. It was China. It was Europe. It was Asia. In other words, every place on the planet where this group of wealthy and powerful held what is in business called a “controlling interest.”

And yet, in my tiny town in the boonies of Texas people went shopping without masks, chuckling at the overreaction of the city folk. Those people in DC, in London, in Beijing, and in Brussels — they weren’t us. They thought they could tell us what to do. But we opted for more common sense measures.

Yet since the Covid fiasco, this conglomeration of petty tyrants has become much less careful about keeping their organization and collaboration under wraps.

Presumably, they’ve acknowledged that the cat has already been let out of the bag with Covid. So now they openly coordinate with each other doing things like sabotaging peace talks between Russia and Ukraine and coordinating a unified response to American tariffs.

We know who they are by their shared methods and goals. It’s no accident that all throughout the West nations are mimicking tactics in lawfare to suppress populist movements. In France, Marine Le Pen has been banned from politics.

Matteo Salvini of Italy escaped being prosecuted for the crime of upholding immigration law, Jair Bolsanaro of Brazil now cannot run until 2030. They actually jailed Calin Georgescu of Romania. And while our current president remains a fitting example of using judges to gatekeep politicians, a little-known J6er, Couy Griffin was actually barred from politics for life by a New Mexico state court which invoked a the Civil War era law against “insurrectionists.”

This transnational Deep State cabal have other shared prerogatives. Like mass immigration and Utopian fantasies about a borderless society, controlling people by censorship or limiting our food supply, weaponizing big data for use against the citizens, training weapons of warfare like drones and intelligence inward towards the very people such weapons were built to protect, and plying the population with massive amounts of pharmaceuticals as well as lethal illegal drugs like fentanyl.

They foment fear. They want us all afraid and yet perpetually tuned out on porn, drugs, or gambling. It’s bread and circuses for the 21st century. You’ll own nothing, eat bugs, spend your entire life never moving more than 15 minutes away, and you’ll be completely disenfranchised, faithless, and hopeless.

This is their shared Utopian vision. But who are “they”? When talking about bureaucrats, we call them “Deep State.” When talking about businesses they’re refereed to as “Globalists.” But they aren’t two different things. We’ve seen how they coordinate. They even take hits for each other when tactics demand it.

If you find their vision and ideals abhorrent you likely already think of all of them under the umbrella term “enemy.”

We are slowly coming to see the total shape of it. Author GK Chesterton plays with the concept that sometimes things can be hidden in plain sight because they are too big.

In one of his murder mysteries, the characters discovered that a victim’s head hadn’t been dashed in by a weapon but by something considerably larger, the Earth itself. The victim fell. We are in a similar situation. We see the trees but not the totality of the forest they comprise.

I argue that we have one more step in discerning the total nature of the enemy. Along with these Deep State and Globalist elements, we must acknowledge that the PRC is also involved on a very intricate level.

I’m not merely talking about the PRC’s normal routine of taking over countries through coercive business loans. The Cabal and the PRC both desire the fall of the West. They both desire the destruction of our culture and our freedoms.

Not to mention the fact that the ideas of Globalism itself is little more than Communism implemented through crony capitalism. The Chinese government, being Communist, is therefore thoroughly ideologically aligned. The Deep State, the Globalists, and the PRC are a single unitive entity. Not separate. But one.

Whether the Deep State/Globalist Cabal and the PRC are acting together as part of a coordinated alliance or it’s incidental that they only appear to be working together is irrelevant.

This isn’t a court hearing and we aren’t in the business of waiting for evidence of culpability. The fact of the matter is that there is profound synergy between the two. In ideology, tactics, and desired outcomes.

The whys, hows, and whats all match. Tactically speaking, that’s all the information we need to answer the question: Who is our enemy?

But we can’t coordinate effectively if we limit ourselves to overly long terms that are themselves practically narrative descriptions. If we talk about our struggle engaging the Deep State/Globalist PRC Cabal in the Hybrid Cold Civil War Gone Global we’ll spend more time talking than a blue-haired weirdo explaining their pronouns in detail.

Not to mention the fact that Aquinas said a sign of lower intelligence is the inability to see wholes and instead to break things down into increasingly smaller and detailed parts in order to comprehend something. I argue that there are too many parts to the phrase Hybrid Cold Civil War Gone Global against the Deep State/Globalist PRC Cabal.

So let’s refine the concept a bit. It’s a war. And we know it’s a global war. That makes it a world war. But it’s not a world war like the clash of nations in world wars one and two. There are elements that make it like a civil war and like a cold war too — a fact I pointed out in my article on Cold Terror.

In a nod to fiction, I think the best way to refine this conflict into something appropriately unique is to compare it to the zombie novel, World War Z. In that novel the world was engaged in a global asymmetrical battle against a plague of zombies. Whereas the enemy in World War Z were hordes of the undead, we are locked in a struggle against Tesla terrorists (and other actors) whose minds have been overthrown by the woke mind virus. To me, that’s close enough.

We swap out the letter, though. Instead of Z for zombies, we use G for Globalists. Not because we’re fighting solely against multinational corporations but because we’re fighting against a deceptive neo-Communist delusional elite, and that’s what Globalism is: a vehicle for implementing Communism.

World War G.

This is the battle of our time. Against an enemy that imprisons their political opponents, weakens Western culture and national sovereignty, and seeks to deprive us of our material possessions as well as our most precious possession of all: our freedoms.

The funny thing is, if you think back to what President Trump has been doing since he got into office — fighting the drug trade and human trafficking, bringing jobs back to America, negotiating the end of forever wars, shrinking government, disemboweling USAID and other government departments of questionable worth or dubious loyalty — he’s been fighting World War G all along.

It’s wrong that our president for the most part appears to fighting this battle alone. At the very least, his own party should be willing to lend more enthusiastic support. So many people just shake their heads at the tariffs. They worry about the political cost should the tariffs not pan out. But that’s extremely shortsighted when we consider the disturbing fact why they were necessary in first place.

What’s at stake isn’t just some polling for the next election. What’s at stake is the very lifeblood of America and, by extension, the West itself. It’s not that the tariffs might not work. It’s that they must work. We’re talking about a war here. It’s a war of everything against everything else. A war where every dime you spend, every word you write, every choice you make either works for our freedom or helps those actively trying to destroy it. We won’t win by pretending that it’s not happening.

Like all world wars, this is going to call for an extraordinary effort on the part of everyone in the country. But at the very least, we need to be fighting it. So let’s gear up and get out there, warriors. We’ve got a war to fight. World War G.

Matt da Silva once worked at the highest levels of government trust as a Japanese and Mandarin Navy linguist. In addition to working at the tip of the intel spear, he also has the distinction of having served 18 months in federal prison for his involvement in Jan 6. Now he’s pardoned and using his intel analysis and writing skills in defense of the 21st century civil rights movement known as America First. You can find more of his writings at his substack (which is free). You may also want to give him a follow on X and TruthSocial. Please subscribe!

The post World War G: Trump’s Tariffs Aren’t Just Economics — They’re America’s Frontline Defense in the Globalist-Communist Hybrid War appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

ALIVE: Pope Francis Makes Surprise First Public Appearance During Sunday Mass in St. Peter’s Square After Long Hospital Stay

The faithful assembled in Vatican’s St. Peter’s Square for the Sunday Mass celebrating the Jubilee were pleasantly surprised by the unannounced appearance by an ailing Pope Francis, in his first public appearance since being discharged from the hospital two weeks ago.

Still weak after his grueling five-week treatment for double pneumonia, Francis entered the Square in a wheelchair to greet the cheering crowd.

Francis hadn’t been seen in public since a short greeting before leaving Rome’s Gemelli hospital on March 23, following the most serious health crisis of his 12-year papacy.

Reuters reported:

“The pope, in a previously unannounced move, came out to the square shortly before noon at the end of the celebration of a Mass for the Catholic Church’s Jubilee year.

Coming in front of the main altar for the service in bright sunshine, Francis waved to the crowds, before speaking briefly.

‘Happy Sunday to everyone’, the pope said, speaking in a rail voice while receiving oxygen via a small hose under his nose. ‘Thank you so much’.”

To the joy of everyone in St. Peter’s Square, this morning Pope Francis made a surprise appearance for the Jubilee of the Sick and Healthcare Workers. Visibly frail, connected to an oxygen tank, with his voice still very weak, he wished everyone a good Sunday. pic.twitter.com/ZlRo00Bp2L

— Catholic Sat (@CatholicSat) April 6, 2025

Today’s mass may have held a particular meaning for Francis as it was a special Jubilee celebration in honor of the sick and the healthcare workers.

“In a written message released by the Vatican shortly after noon, Francis said he had felt God’s closeness during his time in hospital.

‘I ask the Lord that this touch of his love might reach all those who suffer and encourage those who are taking care of them’, said the text.”

I have much in common with you at this time of my life, dear brothers and sisters who are sick: the experience of illness, of weakness, of having to depend on others for so many things, and of needing their support. #Jubilee

— Pope Francis (@Pontifex) April 6, 2025

The hospital room and the sickbed can also be places where we hear the voice of the Lord speak to us: “Behold, I am about to do a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it?” (Is 43:19). In this way, we renew and strengthen our faith. #Jubilee

— Pope Francis (@Pontifex) April 6, 2025

With Easter Sunday just two weeks away, it’s unclear how (or if) the pope will participate in public ceremonies, as doctors have prescribed Francis with a two-month period of rest at his Vatican residence.

Read more:

Pope Francis’ Health Situation Was at One Point So Dire That Doctors Contemplated Stopping the Treatment and ‘Letting Him Die in Peace’

 

The post ALIVE: Pope Francis Makes Surprise First Public Appearance During Sunday Mass in St. Peter’s Square After Long Hospital Stay appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Original Sin: White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller on How America’s Prior Trade Policy Gutted U.S. Industry (Video)

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Miller/Image: Video screenshot.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Miller addressed the stark reality that for decades, America’s trade policies prioritized and rewarded other nations over American workers and American industry. And the political class, both left and right, allowed it to happen.

Miller noted, “The original sin of how the modern economy in America is structured, the President talks about more than anything else. It gets to Caroline’s point about the overall economic vision.”

“The original sin was that we created a tax system that punished you for making something in America and rewarded you for making something in China or a foreign country.”

“So in other words, if you had your factory in America, you paid a sky-high corporate tax rate, you were beaten to death with regulation, you had radically unaffordable energy prices, and Washington, just in every way, made your life miserable.”

Budowich added, “The political class didn’t do anything about it. They allowed it to happen. They sat by and watched it happen for decades.”

Greer noted, “They actually wanted the opposite to happen, especially if you look at the ’90s when we had NAFTA, we had the WTO, we had the entry of China into the WTO.”

“The goal, very clearly, was to remove US tariff and trade barriers to make it easier for people to outsource to China. Because once we gave China what we call permanent normal trade relations, all of your manufacturers in the United States who are thinking in short terms of quarterly earnings, that kind of thing, they said,’ Listen, now I can go move my factory from Indiana or wherever. I can put it in China, I can put it in Mexico, and I know I will have sure access to the US market.’”

“Today, President Trump is saying, ‘The best place to make American products and sell American products is here in America.’”

Watch:

MUST WATCH breakdown of how America Last trade policy gutted U.S. industry:@StephenM: “The original sin was that we created a tax system that punished you for making something in America and rewarded you for making something in China or a foreign country.”@Taylor47: “The… pic.twitter.com/wWIirqLeTM

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) April 5, 2025

Watch the full discussion below.

The post Original Sin: White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller on How America’s Prior Trade Policy Gutted U.S. Industry (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.