Colorado Republicans Ask AG Bondi to Utilize New Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force to Investigate ‘2A Infringements’ Happening in the State

The Colorado State Shooting Association has sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi urging an investigation by the  Department of Justice into the state of Colorado’s gun laws.

The letter raises the alarm that a newly signed law by Democrat Governor Jared Polis infringes on the Second Amendment and notes that 37 Colorado counties “have declared themselves to be ‘Second Amendment Sanctuaries’ in an attempt to oppose or resist the state’s efforts to undermine or effectively deny their rights.”

The group asked that a newly formed task force, the Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force (SAEF), investigate the matter.

AG Bondi announced the creation of SAEF with to “protect gun owners from overreach.”

The letter reads in part:

Dear Attorney General Bondi,

We, the undersigned representatives of the Colorado State Shooting Association, the Colorado Republican Congressional Delegation, the Colorado State Senate Republican Caucus, The Colorado State House Republican Caucus, a coalition of pro-Second Amendment sheriffs, and leaders of Colorado’s pro-Second Amendment movement, write to urgently request that you direct the Department of Justice’s Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force to investigate and take action to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens of the State of Colorado.

Over the past few years, the State of Colorado and some of its larger cities and political subdivisions have, through a progression of increasingly oppressive and burdensome statutes and ordinances, engaged in a systematic and unrelenting campaign designed to restrict, impair, impede and ultimately extinguish Coloradans’ right to keep and bear arms in violation of our Constitution.

**********

SB25-003, recently signed into law by Governor Jared Polis, is especially egregious, imposing restrictions that directly clash with the fundamental right to keep and bear arms as affirmed by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010), and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022). This law, as with many of those listed above, ignores the historical tradition of firearms ownership in America, impermissibly burdens law-abiding gun owners, erodes self-defense rights, and restricts access to firearms in common use. It clearly fails to meet the constitutional benchmarks set by the Supreme Court in these cases.

As congressional leaders, state senators, state representatives, sheriffs, and advocates for Colorado’s Second Amendment community, we see the damaging impact of these laws every day. Even though the Supreme Court has clearly ruled that the Second Amendment should not be treated as a “second-class right,” that has not been the case here in Colorado. While these measures do little to enhance public safety, they create  confusion, and cause law-abiding citizens to fear prosecution and loss of their rights. In response, at least 37 Colorado counties have declared themselves to be “Second Amendment Sanctuaries” in an attempt to oppose or resist the state’s efforts to undermine or effectively deny their rights. That is a testament to the widespread indignation and determination among our communities.

KDVR reports:

Huey Laugesen, executive director of the Colorado State Shooting Association, told FOX31’s Nate Belt that alongside the letter, the association has collected voters’ signatures. As of Monday, Laugesen said they had collected “tens of thousands.”

“When we have government coming in and putting in insurmountable obstacles for a lot of people, and particularly low-income individuals who are much more likely to be victimized by violent criminals, that’s a major problem. That’s some serious overreach,” Laugesen told Belt.

“We won’t stand for it because it’s a very dangerous path that we’re headed down.”

The post Colorado Republicans Ask AG Bondi to Utilize New Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force to Investigate ‘2A Infringements’ Happening in the State appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

AG Pam Bondi Says Authorities Have Seized 22 Million Fentanyl Laced Pills in Trump’s First 100 Days — Enough to Kill 119 Million People

Attorney General Pam Bondi

The Trump administration has seized over 22 million fentanyl-laced pills since he took office in January, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced this week.

“Today is Fentanyl Awareness Day,” Bondi wrote on the X platform on Tuesday.

“In President Trump’s first 100 days, we’ve seized over 22 million fentanyl-laced pills, saving over 119 million lives.”

“We are fighting relentlessly for the families of loved ones lost, for those whose lives are at risk, and for the soul of our nation.

”We will not rest until this poison is off our streets and those peddling it are behind bars.”

Today is Fentanyl Awareness day. In President Trump’s first 100 days we’ve seized over 22 million fentanyl laced pills, saving over 119 Million lives.

We are fighting relentlessly for the families of loved ones lost, for those whose lives are at risk, and for the soul of our… pic.twitter.com/nQLnN0nipn

— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) April 29, 2025

America’s fentanyl crisis has become one of the most lethal drug epidemics in the nation’s history, claiming the lives of over 100,000 people every year.

A synthetic opioid up to 50 times more potent than heroin, fentanyl is often mixed into counterfeit pills or street drugs without users’ knowledge, drastically increasing the risk of overdose.

Yesterday, @AGPamBondi toured the @DEAHQ forensic lab for a firsthand look at how experts detect and disrupt the spread of illicit fentanyl.

In just 100 days, the DEA has seized more than 22 million fentanyl-laced pills – preventing overdoses and saving countless lives. pic.twitter.com/SPMb4Oqtu7

— U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) April 30, 2025

The drug is primarily manufactured in China and trafficked across the southern border through Mexico, where drug cartels press it into pills designed to mimic prescription medications.

DOJ Identifies Chinese Nationals and Companies Directly Aiding Mexican Drug Cartels and Supplying Fentanyl Precursors to Mexico

On his first day in office, President Trump designated Mexican drug cartels as a foreign terrorist organization, a move that gives law enforcement more power to arrest and detain those suspected of working with them.

Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has refused to rule out the possibility of launching military strikes against cartel operating basis.

“All options will be on the table if we’re dealing with what are designated to be foreign terrorist organizations who are specifically targeting Americans on our border,” Hegseth said back in February.

The post AG Pam Bondi Says Authorities Have Seized 22 Million Fentanyl Laced Pills in Trump’s First 100 Days — Enough to Kill 119 Million People appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WATCH: Will Cain BLOWS UP Loathsome Rep. Dan Goldman With Multiple Truth Bombs After Goldman Questions Trump’s Cognitive State and Suggests Invoking the 25th Amendment

Credit: Fox News Channel Screenshot

One of the absolute worst congressmen in America got a much-deserved verbal spanking on national TV after suggesting Trump lacked the cognitive ability to serve as President.

Far-left Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) appeared on Fox News’s The Will Cain Show on Wednesday to give his take on Trump’s first 100 days in office. By bringing Goldman on, Cain perhaps thought they would have a fiery conversation, but one dealing with reality.

But instead of trying to have a productive talk with Cain regarding Trump, Goldman immediately suggested that Trump was suffering from cognitive decline. Of course, Goldman never questioned Biden’s obvious dementia.

“Will, I don’t know if it’s competence or cognitive abilities…Or just flat-out lying, but Donald Trump doesn’t know that a photo he’s showing is photoshopped or the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 against him,” Goldman whined. “He doesn’t know what trade deficits…So you can call it whatever you want, but it’s been a pretty disastrous first 100 days.”

Cain had some cold, hard facts ready for Goldman’s garbage.

“I can debate you on each and every one of those things you just laid out, but I don’t think you can call it whatever you want,” he fired back. “I think that’s an incorrect statement; words have meaning and they have meaning.”

I think we have to be careful with our words, especially if we’re not trying to inflame the public, and most certainly if we are trying to arrive at the truth,” Cain continued. “And after four years of having us gaslighted over the competency of the previous president, it’s ABSURD to question the competence of the sitting president.”

Undeterred, Goldman doubled down on his ridiculous lies.

“I don’t think he’s competent, Will, whether his cognitive abilities are sufficient to get past the 25th Amendment…We don’t know that right now,” he stated before going on a list of a series of lies about Trump’s record and political beliefs.

“You have to agree with me that these days are not at all what he promised the American people,” Goldman continued.

But Cain instead called out Goldman’s lies again.

“No, I’m sorry to notify you that I do not agree with you,” Cain retorted. “These first 100 days are exactly what he promised the American people and, most importantly, what was voted on by the American people.”

“But the American people thought he was going to lower costs, not raise them,” Goldman complained.

Cain responded by dropping yet another truth bomb on Goldman’s head.

“Congressman, he talked about bringing tariffs in for 40 YEARS,” Cain shot back. “Inflation is down…It (tariffs) is a long-term play to reorganize the global economy to bring manufacturing back to America.”

Then, Cain dropped the final dagger.

WATCH:

Will Cain GOES OFF on Rep Dan Goldman after he bring up the 25th amendment.

Goldman: “Well I don’t think he is competent Will, I don’t know what to tell you. Whether his cognitive abilities are sufficient to get past the 25th amendment.”

“I have, here, a list of topics that I… pic.twitter.com/HeTYjMqvD5

— DeVory Darkins (@devorydarkins) April 30, 2025

“I have, here, a list of topics that I thought maybe you’d be interested in talking about. I looked at your feed,” Cain said. “You have concerns about potential cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, you have potential concerns about cuts to FEMA, but you have chosen to come here with me today.”

“And I’m disappointed in this, I’m being honest with you, Congressman, and talked about the 25th Amendment?” he added. “There’s a difference between you and I disagreeing and what the Minority leader and you have now just done.”

“And you have suggested to the American people that just because you disagree, he needs to see the 25th Amendment. I’m confident we’re off to a productive conversation here.”

As Cain talked, Goldman could only manage a deer-in-the-headlights look. He did not expect such harsh pushback to his vicious falsehoods.

Now, if only the rest of the media gave other Democrats this kind of treatment.

The post WATCH: Will Cain BLOWS UP Loathsome Rep. Dan Goldman With Multiple Truth Bombs After Goldman Questions Trump’s Cognitive State and Suggests Invoking the 25th Amendment appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Famed Investigative Journalist James O’Keefe Drops Cryptic Message: “I am Not Suicidal… Please Pray for Me”

Credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr

James O’Keefe, the fearless journalist who rocked the political establishment with undercover exposés of ACORN, Planned Parenthood, and Big Tech, has just released a cryptic and chilling message that’s raising alarms across social media.

In a video posted to X, O’Keefe appeared visibly shaken as he stated, “I’m going dark. I’m not suicidal. Pray for me. This one scares me, guys.” The message was accompanied by the ominous caption: “T-minus seven days.”

“T-minus seven days” is a countdown expression that means seven days remain until a specific event occurs.

WATCH:

T-minus seven days. pic.twitter.com/wcU4tJvHLF

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) April 30, 2025

While O’Keefe has not revealed exactly what is coming, The Gateway Pundit previously reported that he is preparing to drop the biggest story of his career—something involving massive government corruption and potentially tens of billions of dollars in fraud.

James O’Keefe of the O’Keefe Media Group said he is dropping a massive bombshell within the next month or so.

O’Keefe said what he is releasing is bigger than his work exposing ACORN.

“This is ACORN 2.0? Or is it bigger?” podcast host Benny Johnson asked O’Keefe.

James O’Keefe said it’s much bigger.

“No, it’s much bigger because we’re talking about corrupt government… Billions of dollars – tens of billions… stay tuned,” O’Keefe said.

“I have these people breaking the law,” O’Keefe said.

WATCH:

BREAKING: James O’Keefe Announces Massive BOMBSHELL Dropping Next Month, Gov’t Officials Caught On Camera, BILLIONS of Dollars In Corruption Exposed:

“Billions in government corruption. Five or six tapes… Lead to indictments.. Have them breaking the law.. on camera.” pic.twitter.com/63uwWKrKoF

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) April 25, 2025

James O’Keefe also said there is more to come on Epstein.

“I think it’s time for the citizen journalists to release more on Epstein. If they’re going to kill us, they’ll have to kill us all. Coming soon…” O’Keefe said.

I think it’s time for the citizen journalists to release more on Epstein.

If they’re going to kill us, they’ll have to kill us all.

Coming soon… pic.twitter.com/Dkrt0IhUvw

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) April 26, 2025

O’Keefe’s cryptic warning comes as he continues a very public battle against Project Veritas board member Matthew Tyrmand — the man O’Keefe says orchestrated his ouster from the organization he founded.

Here’s the tweet from O’Keefe:

This is Matthew Tyrmand. He is the board member who fired me from Project Veritas. While few may know who he is, that’s about to change soon.

We’ve obtained new evidence about what happened. He knows what he did. That’s why he sends pornographic, unhinged messages to me on a weekly basis. That’s why one message was a picture of me nailed to a Crucifix. That’s why he posted private medical records and intimate texts of employees loved ones who he wanted to harm. The messages were obtained from devices of employees.

That’s why he said he wanted to “carve out James heart and eat it in front of him.”

This man is afraid because he has been subpoenaed. He has much to hide. He will be brought to justice, so help me God.

Stay tuned.

This is Matthew Tyrmand. He is the board member who fired me from Project Veritas.

While few may know who he is, that’s about to change soon.

We’ve obtained new evidence about what happened. He knows what he did.

That’s why he sends pornographic, unhinged messages to me on… pic.twitter.com/Qx3LfY5D94

— James O’Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) April 11, 2025

The post Famed Investigative Journalist James O’Keefe Drops Cryptic Message: “I am Not Suicidal… Please Pray for Me” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

ATTN DOGE: NIH Renews Massive Funding for Fauci’s Infamously Cruel Monkey Island

The National Institutes of Health just renewed funding for Dr. Anthony Fauci’s infamously cruel “Monkey Island” off the coast of South Carolina.

The Trump administration has been working to clean up Joe Biden and Fauci’s wasteful spending and funding of barbaric and outdated animal testing, but it seems that holdovers from the previous administration have other plans.

According to the transaction history, the NIH will potentially award Alpha Genesis a total of $26.9 million in taxpayer funds to maintain the island. Managing the island has cost Americans more than $66 million to date.

Finally, we get to Dr. Fauci’s funky monkey island.

Since 1979, Dr. Fauci’s @NIH division has maintained an island that currently houses 3,379 monkeys for use in taxpayer-funded experiments.

Managing the island has cost more than $66 million to date (adjusted for inflation).

— Joni Ernst (@SenJoniErnst) December 14, 2024

In 2021, White Coat Waste, a watchdog organization working to end cruel and unnecessary taxpayer-funded animal experimentation, exposed how Monkey Island confines over 3,300 primates who are bred and then shipped to labs for deadly and horrific “maximum pain” research.

In a statement about the funding, WCW President Anthony Bellotti told Gateway Pundit:

“As the watchdog that first exposed Fauci’s funding for the Wuhan labbeagle abuseMonkey Island, and transgender animal experiments, we’re alarmed that NIH just renewed millions for more Biden-Fauci era animal abuse. President Trump’s message is crystal clear: cut NIH’s wasteful spending. But Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and the NIH staff either didn’t get Trump’s memo—or they’re ignoring it. Instead, Biden-Fauci holdovers at NIH are planning to open a new, big government department in the Beltway, they’re renewing Fauci payouts to animal labs where beagles are eaten alive by insects, and they’re promoting Fauci’s top lieutenants who champion gain-of-function. Just yesterday, they unveiled a foolish spending policy on “alternatives” that’s indistinguishable from the Biden-Fauci NIH—one that won’t hold Fauci accountable or save any animals in labs. NIH’s bureaucrats are undermining President Trump. More bureaucracy won’t save beagles, and it won’t make America greater for animals. The solution is simple: Stop the money. Stop the madness!”

An estimated 500 to 600 monkeys are taken from the island each year and sent to NIH and other government labs, where they’re infected with viruses, mutilated, and killed.

The Post and Courier reported this week:

About 500 primates, each bearing a numeric chest tattoo, are trapped every year, ferried to the mainland and trucked to federal laboratories. There, they may be sacrificed to develop vaccines, pharmaceuticals and medical devices. They’ve been called a vital part of national security, and the federal government pays about $4 million a year to keep an ample supply.

The monkey colony stayed over the objections of federal officials and conservationists. It became, in the words of one top former state official, a “performing asset” that generated lease money used to fund other programs and salaries.

A 2018 NIAID paper described the development of the deadly Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHFV) in monkeys taken from the island in very graphic detail.

White Coat Waste provided Gateway Pundit with a photo of one of the monkeys that was infected with the virus:

One of the primates from Monkey Island infected with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever at NIH’s Rocky Mountain Lab in Montana.

 

The agency used fifteen rhesus and African green monkeys for the pilot study. In the main study, they used a dozen macaque monkeys, who were injected with the painful virus and killed on the seventh day of the test.

The primates from the island have also been used for testing related to AIDS, polio, and even bioterrorism. Only researchers and officials are allowed on the secretive island, which sits at 32.4774º N and 80.5195ºW. The public is banned from entering.

WCW also obtained video through a FOIA lawsuit against NIH, revealing how NIH’s Rocky Mountain Lab in Montana tortures monkeys it receives from the island in Ebola and COVID experiments.

The NIH is paying $22.8 million in taxpayer dollars to Alpha Genesis, the company with the NIAID contract, to manage the island. This is the same company that let 43 monkeys escape from its South Carolina lab last year.

According to a report from White Coat Waste, “In 2024 alone, Alpha Genesis raked in at least $19 million in taxpayer funding—all from NIH. They’ve received over $110 million in federal funding since 2008, including millions in special COVID-19 emergency funding and a $1 million COVID bailout.”

It’s time for another ️ #WasteReportWednesday ️ Read more at https://t.co/VsSbLKRlD6 https://t.co/CbS9SMccmU

— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) January 24, 2024

On Tuesday, independent journalist Laura Loomer reported that the NIH claims it will “aim to reduce the number of animals” used in research, instead of cutting the funding entirely.

Wow! Shame on the @NIH under @DrJBhattacharya.

Today, right before President Trump’s speech in Michigan, the NIH quietly released this statement following increasing pressure on them to end animal testing under the new Trump admin.

The release comes shortly after BOMBSHELL… https://t.co/Q4G4SuEKKd pic.twitter.com/pU9A2kCU5h

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) April 29, 2025

Loomer wrote:

Today, right before President Trump’s speech in Michigan, the NIH quietly released this statement following increasing pressure on them to end animal testing under the new Trump admin.

The release comes shortly after BOMBSHELL reports from White Coat Waste, who exposed the fact that Fauci’s abusive experiments on Beagles are still being funded under the new Trump admin, and new @NIHDirector.

This press release release claims the NIH will only “aim to reduce the use of animals in NIH research” going forward, instead of completely cutting the funding for the abuse of Beagles, the torture of cats, monkeys, and the funding for trans experiments on MICE.

I guess @DrJBhattacharya is hoping people are too distracted by the Trump rally in Michigan tonight to notice his press release, in which he won’t even commit to ending abusive, tax payer funded tests on innocent animals.

We were told Fauci and Biden were EVIL for these cruel animal tests, but now these same experiments are still being funded under the Trump admin, and NIH won’t even commit to ENDING all of these animal abuse experiments.

White Coat Waste President Anthony Bellotti issued a statement in response, saying, “More NIH bureaucracy won’t save beagles. The only way to reduce animal abuse in NIH-funded labs is to tear down departments, not build new ones.”

.@POTUS & @SecKennedy promised to clean up Fauci’s wasteful spending

Instead, Biden/Fauci NIH holdovers are:

Renewing Fauci’s beagle labs
Extending transgender animal tests
Replacing Fauci w/gain-of-function colleague
Defending animal tests & adding NIH bureaucracy https://t.co/9YlAnlr5rr

— White Coat Waste (@WhiteCoatWaste) April 30, 2025

Following WCW’s investigations, the Trump administration has cut 10 NIH grants funding transgender animal experiments.

FDA’s Move to Phase Out Animal Testing Hailed as Victory for White Coat Waste Project

Earlier this month, Trump’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced plans to phase out animal testing requirements, starting with monoclonal antibodies and expanding to other drugs. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also pledged to eliminate animal testing, reinstating a plan originally introduced during President Donald Trump’s first term.

The Gateway Pundit has contacted the NIH for comment and will update this story if one is provided.

The post ATTN DOGE: NIH Renews Massive Funding for Fauci’s Infamously Cruel Monkey Island appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Courts Hold Grooming Kids in School is Fine But Don’t You Dare Mention God

In a recent case, Lee v. Poudre School District R-1, Colorado parents Jonathan and Erin Lee, along with Nicolas and Linnaea Jurich, sued their school district, alleging it groomed their daughters into the LGBTQ cult through secretive Gender and Sexualities Alliance (GSA) meetings. They claimed teachers misled their children about gender identity, encouraged them to hide it from parents, and caused severe emotional harm, including suicidal ideation.

Yet, on April 22, 2025, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of their lawsuit because, according to the Court, the parents failed to prove the district’s policies directly caused their injuries.

Let’s rewind to 1992’s Lee v. Weisman, when the U.S. Supreme Court swooped in to “save” a defenseless girl from hearing a rabbi’s invocation at her graduation. The Court declared that even a brief prayer violated the First Amendment because of the potential coercive effect on the poor defenseless girl who was subjected to hear the Name of God. The Court feared that – God forbid – an atheist student may be persuaded to believe in God at a public school, and the Court could not take that chance. The Supreme Court sent a clear message: God has no place within America’s schools.

The Supreme Court as composed June 30, 2022, to present.
Credit: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States.

But today the Courts have no problem with subjecting kids to the gospel of the LGBTQ religious cult. Journalists like Libs of TikTok have exposed the epidemic of blue-haired teachers, faces riddled with piercings, draping pride flags over classrooms and preaching the gospel of gender confusion to vulnerable children. These activists confuse kids—already grappling with the chaos of adolescence—pushing them toward identities and ideologies that tear families apart and in many cases lead to irreparable psychological injuries.

This is far worse than the Rabbi’s short invocation that the Supreme Court called coercive when they put an end to school prayer nationwide. Yet, when parents, like those in Lee v. Poudre, fight back, courts toss their cases. Courts will intervene to banish even the mention of God from the schools. But when it comes to protecting kids from relentless LGBTQ indoctrination, the Courts humbly decide not to get involve and to deprive the parents of their day in court.

The Lee v. Poudre Case: A Disturbing Case of School Grooming

In Lee v. Poudre School District, the parents alleged that a Wellington Middle-High School teacher had private talks with a 12-year-old student, urging her to reject feminine pronouns and inviting her to a “GSA Art Club” meeting that was actually a Gender and Sexualities Alliance session where a teacher lectured kids for 90 minutes about how discomfort with their bodies meant they were likely transgender and at higher risk of suicide. The teacher handed out LGBTQ-themed prizes to students who “came out” as transgender and warned them not to tell their parents, even giving out her personal contact info for secret chats. The 12-year-old, who had never before questioned her gender, declared herself transgender at the meeting but told her parents, who promptly pulled her from the district. Another sixth-grader was told the same alarming messages at similar meetings and spiraled into suicidal thoughts, believing her distress “proved” she was transgender. She later attempted suicide, and her parents also withdrew her from the school.

The parents pointed to district policies, like the Guidelines for Supporting Transgender and Non-Binary Students, which instructed staff to withhold students’ transgender status from parents unless legally required or authorized by the student. They argued these policies enabled a culture of secrecy, allowing teachers to manipulate impressionable kids without parental knowledge. The district defended itself, claiming the policies merely protected student privacy and created a “safe space.”

The Tenth Circuit, however, didn’t even address whether the policies violated parental rights. Instead, it ruled the parents couldn’t prove the district’s policies directly caused the teachers’ actions, like misleading kids about the GSA meetings or discouraging parental disclosure. In a concurring opinion, Judge McHugh acknowledged the policies could implicate parental rights by encouraging secrecy but agreed the parents’ specific injuries weren’t tied closely enough to those policies.

The Controversy: A Double Standard

The controversy in Lee v. Poudre is part of a broader cultural battle. Parents across the country are sounding alarms as schools embrace LGBTQ ideology, often without transparency. Teachers, emboldened by policies like Poudre’s, are accused of grooming kids into a cult-like mindset, convincing them that questioning their gender is a rite of passage and that parents can’t be trusted, actively undermining families.

But in Lee v. Weisman the Supreme Court didn’t hesitate to intervene. A rabbi’s prayer at a graduation was deemed so harmful that it warranted a nationwide ban on school-sponsored religious expression. The Court didn’t dodge the issue with technicalities; it acted decisively to purge God from public schools. Yet, when parents beg courts to protect their kids from ideologues pushing gender confusion, the response is a shrug. The Lee v. Poudre court could have tackled the question of whether schools can constitutionally hide critical information from parents but instead took the easy out, claiming the parents’ evidence didn’t meet the stringent standard for municipal liability.

Why This Matters

The Lee v. Poudre case exposes a double standard in how courts treat schools. When it’s about banishing religion, the judiciary leaps into action, as in Lee v. Weisman. But when schools are accused of grooming kids into the LGBTQ religious cult, courts hide behind legal technicalities, leaving parents powerless. This isn’t just a Colorado problem—it’s a national crisis. Libs of TikTok and others have documented countless teachers openly boasting about “queering” their classrooms, confusing students as young as elementary school age. The harm is undeniable: children suffer mental health crises, families fracture, and parents are left in the dark.

The significance of this case lies in what it reveals about judicial priorities. Courts have shown they’ll reshape school culture to align with secular values but won’t lift a finger to stop what many see as ideological grooming. The Lee v. Poudre ruling sends a chilling message: schools can push radical agendas on kids, and parents have little legal recourse. Until courts take parental rights as seriously as they take the separation of church and state, children will remain vulnerable to the LGBTQ religious cult’s influence in schools, and parents will keep fighting an uphill battle.

The post Courts Hold Grooming Kids in School is Fine But Don’t You Dare Mention God appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Senator Schumer Proudly Announces “SAVE Act” Is Dead – Democrats Kill Voter ID Laws – It’s Time for Republicans to Suspend the Filibuster on This One – Don’t Let the Lunatics Win!

Senator Chuck Schumer announced Wednesday on the Senate floor that no Democrat will vote for the SAVE Act to secure US elections.

It threatens the party’s future.

Senator Schumer announces Democrats will kill the SAVE Act that requires Voter ID to cast a ballot.

Chuck Schumer: The kind of legislation, the kind of executive orders, which are so jaundiced, so slanted on the side of one party, are the antithesis of democracy.

On the one side, Donald Trump recently issued an executive order that will coerce states to prevent millions of Americans from voting. On the other, Republicans in Congress are pushing the SAVE Act, one of the most destructive, dangerous voter suppression bills in recent memory. It is very reminiscent of Jim Crow. That’s what Republicans want to do. They want to not only restore Jim Crow in the south, they want to have Jim Crow spread from one end of this country to the other.

It will not happen. It will not happen. Let me be clear. I will not let this noxious bill, the Save Act, become law. Every Senate Democrat, every single one of us is united against it. They need 60 votes. The SAVE Act is dead on arrival. I’d like to say it louder so my friends in the House and in the right wing over here can hear. The SAVE Act is dead on arrival. Democrats.

Our first reaction to Senator Schumer is to remind him that the Jim Crow Laws were Democrat laws to keep free blacks from voting.

Our second reaction is that every single word Chuck said is an outright lie and he knows it. We are not dealing with decent, honest people here. These are radical, power-hungry tyrants who know that mandatory Voter ID laws will kill their chances in any election.

Democrats must cheat to win.

And, Democrats can only block such common-sense legislation due to a complacent liberal media.

Here is the video via Eric Daugherty.

JUST IN: Chuck Schumer announces that the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to register to vote nationwide, is DONE. Won’t go to Trump’s desk. DOA.

It needs 60 votes. Schumer turned around, looked at Republicans, and gloated as he said this.

“The SAVE Act [will]… pic.twitter.com/Kbl1mYFfSy

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 30, 2025

According to GROK.

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act is a proposed U.S. bill (H.R. 22 in the 119th Congress, 2025) that aims to ensure only U.S. citizens register to vote in federal elections by requiring documentary proof of citizenship, such as a passport, birth certificate, or specific REAL ID-compliant identification indicating citizenship. It amends the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, prohibiting states from processing voter registration applications without this proof and requiring in-person submission in most cases, which would eliminate online and mail-in registration options. The bill also mandates states to establish programs to verify citizenship using federal databases and imposes criminal penalties on election officials who register applicants without proper documentation.

Here is an online reaction to Schumer’s remarks.

The only reason to kill the SAVE Act?
To let non-citizens vote.
Simple as that. No other explanation holds water.
Democracy rigged by design. pic.twitter.com/IX8lvPCqYH

— Peter Malcolm (@pmal5098) April 30, 2025

Kill the filibuster.

Time for republicans to kill the filibuster. Democrats were going to do it to pass their election bill to legalize mail-in ballots, no ID requirements, etc.

— The Researcher (@listen_2learn) April 30, 2025

Leader Thume should make them vote on it!

Time for republicans to kill the filibuster. Democrats were going to do it to pass their election bill to legalize mail-in ballots, no ID requirements, etc.

— The Researcher (@listen_2learn) April 30, 2025

Stop the cheaters.

Maybe we should stop letting them cheat in senate elections I mean I literally watched them steal Georgia, Michigan, and Arizona in the last 5 years ! Maybe we should pay attention and start arresting the cheaters! WE ARE NOT A SERIOUS COUNTRY!!!

— Willy Who (@NYRwiLLyWonKA) April 30, 2025

The post Senator Schumer Proudly Announces “SAVE Act” Is Dead – Democrats Kill Voter ID Laws – It’s Time for Republicans to Suspend the Filibuster on This One – Don’t Let the Lunatics Win! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

BREAKING: Senate Vote to Eliminate Trump’s Tariffs FAILS Despite Three GOPers Siding With Democrats – Two Senators Who Would Have Voted to Terminate Did Not Show Up to Vote

Credit: C-SPAN 2 screenshot

The Democrat and RINO effort to blow up Trump’s global tariffs suffered an embarrassing failure in the Senate this evening after two senators failed to vote.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Senator Rand Paul (RINO-KY) had sponsored a resolution that would have terminated ALL of Trump’s tariffs, including those on America’s top adversary, China.

The vote deadlocked 49-49, meaning it failed by one vote. But there were three Republicans who voted to stab Trump in the back and end the global tariffs:

Rand Paul of Kentucky

Susan Collins of Maine

Lisa Murkowski of Alaska

Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) did not show up to cast their votes. Had they done so, the measure would have passed.

Paul’s legislation is similar to the tariff bill passed earlier this month, though more expansive. That bill, sponsored by Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), would have terminated the national emergency tariffs only on Canada.

Even if Paul’s bill had passed, it faced almost certain defeat in the House of Representatives. In addition, Republicans have also recently voted to make it harder for lawmakers to take up resolutions related to Trump’s tariff authority as NBC notes.

The White House said on Tuesday that Trump would veto the resolution if it reached his desk.

Paul expected the resolution to pass in the Senate this week and took direct aim at House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) for working to block the measure in the House.

Paul attacked Johnson for “chicanery” and “dishonesty” for inserting a provision in House rules that would prevent the anti-tariff resolution from being considered.

“I would call it chicanery. I would call it dishonesty. I mean, it’s just a terrible idea that he’s actually overturning the law with a rule,” Paul said.

The post BREAKING: Senate Vote to Eliminate Trump’s Tariffs FAILS Despite Three GOPers Siding With Democrats – Two Senators Who Would Have Voted to Terminate Did Not Show Up to Vote appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

(VIDEO) President Trump Says New Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney Wants to Make a Deal as Trump Continues Calls for Canadian Statehood – Says Carney Come to White House “Within The Next Week”

President Trump reacted to the Canadian Prime Minister election results on Wednesday during a cabinet meeting and announced that the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney, wants to make a deal with the United States amid tensions over tariffs. 

The President has had a contentious relationship with Canada since his tariffs were imposed on February 1, roughly one week after Inauguration Day. He has said that Canada should become the 51st state if they can’t afford tariffs.

Trump’s tariffs led to backlash from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who responded by threatening his own tariffs on the United States, and Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who recently vowed to “inflict as much pain as possible on the American people.”.

However, on Wednesday, Trump announced that Carney is “going to come to the White House very shortly, within the next week,” after calling the President and saying, “let’s make a deal.”

This comes as Trump has reiterated his interest in making Canada the 51st state.

During a recent Time Magazine interview, Trump said he’s “really not trolling” about acquiring Greenland and making Canada the 51st state.

“We lose $200 to $250 billion a year supporting Canada. And I asked a man who I called Governor Trudeau, I said, ‘Why? Why do you think we’re losing so much money supporting you? Do you think that’s right?’” Trump said.

“We don’t need anything from Canada. And I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state.”

Trump Asserts He’s Serious About Canada Becoming 51st State — ‘I’m Really Not Trolling’

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Mark Carney defeated conservative Pierre Poilievre and New Democrat Jagmeet Singh in the national elections on Monday.

Poilievre couldn’t keep his mouth shut about hating Trump, which cost him the election. “I actually think the conservative hated me much more than the so-called liberal,” Trump said of the election.

Prime Minister Mark Carney promised to crack down on free speech in his latest campaign stop in Hamilton, Canada, worrying many that he will be no better than Marxist Justin Trudeau.

Still, Trump called him a “very nice gentleman,” with whom he’s going to have a “great relationship.”

“he’s going to come to the White House very shortly,  within the next week,” Trump said.

Watch:

Trump: I think we’re gonna have a great relationship. He called me up yesterday and said, let’s make a deal. He was running for office. They were both— they both hated trump, and it was the one that hated trump, i think, the least that won. I actually think the conservative hated me much more than the so-called liberal; he’s a pretty liberal guy.

But no, i spoke to him yesterday, couldn’t have been nicer. And I congratulated him. You know, it was a very mixed signal because it’s almost even, which makes it very complicated for the country. That’s pretty tight race, but he’s a very nice gentleman, and he’s going to come to the White House very shortly, within the next week.

The post (VIDEO) President Trump Says New Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney Wants to Make a Deal as Trump Continues Calls for Canadian Statehood – Says Carney Come to White House “Within The Next Week” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

JUST IN: 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Stacked with Leftist Judges Vote to Keep Block on DOGE’s Access to Social Security Data

Image courtesy of El Cronista.

The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday voted 9-6 to keep the block on DOGE’s access to social security data.

The court’s entire slate of judges (en banc) weighed in on Wednesday: Chief Judge Diaz (Obama), Judge King (Clinton), Judge Gregory (Clinton), Judge Wynn (Obama), Judge Thacker (Obama), Judge Harris (Obama), Judge Heytens (Biden), Judge Benjamin (Biden), and Judge Berner (Biden) voted to deny the motion to stay.

Judge Wilkinson (Reagan), Judge Niemeyer (George H.W. Bush), Judge Agee (George W. Bush), Judge Richardson (Trump), Judge Quattlebaum (Trump), and Judge Rushing (Trump) voted to grant the motion to stay.

Last month a federal judge on Thursday barred DOGE from accessing social security systems.

US District Judge Ellen Hollander, an Obama appointee, said DOGE’s workers are on a “fishing expedition.”

“The DOGE Team is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion. It has launched a search for the proverbial needle in the haystack, without any concrete knowledge that the needle is actually in the haystack,” Judge Hollander wrote.

Far-left organizations like AFL-CIO, the American Federation of Teachers and other plaintiffs sued the Social Security Administration, Elon Musk, DOGE and other Trump advisors.

On April 17, Judge Hollander issued a preliminary injunction extending the ban on Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the personal records of millions of Americans stored by the Social Security Administration (SSA).

Judge Hollander issued a scathing 148-page ruling siding with far-left unions and advocacy groups over the privacy of government records, despite the Trump administration’s claim that the access was crucial to rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse in the bloated entitlement bureaucracy.

On Wednesday the DC Circuit Court declined to stay Judge Hollander’s injunction.

The post JUST IN: 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Stacked with Leftist Judges Vote to Keep Block on DOGE’s Access to Social Security Data appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.