DOJ Charges 324 in Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in U.S. History — $14.6 BILLION Scheme Involved 96 Doctors, Nurses, and Pharmacists Targeting Medicare and Medicaid

Screenshot: Fox News

The Department of Justice on Monday unveiled a record-shattering crackdown on the corrupt underbelly of America’s health care system. A jaw-dropping 324 defendants — including 96 medical professionals — have been charged in 50 federal districts and 12 states for orchestrating over $14.6 billion in intended fraud, largely targeting Medicare, Medicaid, and federal health programs meant to serve the elderly, disabled, and the poor.

The takedown, spearheaded by the DOJ’s Health Care Fraud Unit in coordination with HHS-OIG, the FBI, the DEA, and over a dozen state attorney general offices, marks the largest health care fraud bust in U.S. history.

“Today, as we announced the largest coordinated health care fraud takedown in the history of the Department of Justice, it marks a decisive moment in our fight to protect American taxpayers from fraudsters and to defend the integrity of America’s health care system,” said Matthew R. Galeotti, DOJ’s Head of the Criminal Division.

“We are announcing today charges against 324 defendants for their alleged participation in health care fraud schemes involving approximately $14.6 billion in false claims submitted to Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs.”

“These criminals didn’t just steal someone else’s money — they stole from you. Every fraudulent claim, every fake billing, every kickback scheme represents money taken directly from the pockets of American taxpayers who fund these essential programs through their hard work and sacrifice. And when criminals defraud these programs, they’re not just committing theft — they’re driving up our national deficit and threatening the long-term viability of health care for seniors, disabled Americans, and our most vulnerable citizens.”

WATCH:

More from the DOJ:

Transnational Criminal Organizations

29 defendants were charged for their roles in transnational criminal organizations alleged to have submitted over $12 billion in fraudulent claims to America’s health insurance programs.

For instance, a nationwide investigation known as Operation Gold Rush resulted in the largest loss amount ever charged in a health care fraud case brought by the Department. These charges were announced in the Eastern District of New York, the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District of California, the Middle District of Florida, and the District of New Jersey against 19 defendants. Twelve of these defendants have been arrested, including four defendants who were apprehended in Estonia as a result of international cooperation with Estonian law enforcement and seven defendants who were arrested at U.S. airports and the U.S. border with Mexico, cutting off their intended escape routes as they attempted to avoid capture.

The organization allegedly used a network of foreign straw owners, including individuals sent into the United States from abroad, who, acting at the direction of others using encrypted messaging and assumed identities from overseas, strategically bought dozens of medical supply companies located across the United States. They then rapidly submitted $10.6 billion in fraudulent health care claims to Medicare for urinary catheters and other durable medical equipment by exploiting the stolen identities of over one million Americans spanning all 50 states and using their confidential medical information to submit the fraudulent claims. As alleged, the organization exploited the U.S. financial system by laundering the fraudulent proceeds and deploying a range of tactics to circumvent anti-money laundering controls to transfer funds into cryptocurrency and shell companies located abroad. The arrests announced today also include a banker who facilitated the money laundering of fraud proceeds on behalf of the organization through a U.S.-based bank.

The Health Care Fraud Unit’s Data Analytics Team and its partners detected the anomalous billing through proactive data analytics, and HHS-OIG and CMS successfully prevented the organization from receiving all but approximately $41 million of the approximately $4.45 billion that was scheduled to be paid by Medicare. HHS and CMS intend to seek to return the $4.41 billion in escrow to the Medicare trust fund for needed medical care. The scheme nonetheless resulted in payments of approximately $900 million from Medicare supplemental insurers. To date, law enforcement has seized approximately $27.7 million in fraud proceeds as part of Operation Gold Rush.

In another action involving foreign influence, charges were filed in the Northern District of Illinois against five defendants, including two owners and executives of Pakistani marketing organizations, in connection with a $703 million scheme in which Medicare beneficiaries’ identification numbers and other confidential health information were allegedly obtained through theft and deceptive marketing. The defendants allegedly used artificial intelligence to create fake recordings of Medicare beneficiaries purportedly consenting to receive certain products. According to court documents, the beneficiaries’ confidential information was then illegally sold to laboratories and durable medical equipment companies, which used this unlawfully obtained and fraudulently generated data to submit false claims to Medicare. Certain defendants controlled dozens of nominee-owned durable medical equipment companies and laboratories that allegedly submitted fraudulent claims for products and services the beneficiaries did not request, need, or receive. Certain defendants also allegedly conspired to conceal and launder the fraud proceeds from bank accounts they controlled in the United States to bank accounts overseas. In total, the defendants caused approximately $703 million in alleged fraudulent claims to Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans, which paid approximately $418 million on those claims. The government seized approximately $44.7 million from various bank accounts related to this case.

Finally, a defendant based in Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates who owned a billing company allegedly orchestrated a scheme to prey upon vulnerable individuals in need of addiction treatment by conspiring with treatment center owners to fraudulently bill Arizona Medicaid approximately $650 million for substance abuse treatment services. According to court documents, some of the services billed were never provided, while other services were provided at a level that was so substandard that it failed to serve any treatment purpose. As part of the conspiracy, treatment center owners allegedly paid illegal kickbacks in exchange for the referral of patients recruited from the homeless population and Native American reservations. The defendant received at least $25 million of ill-gotten Arizona Medicaid funds as a result of the conspiracy and is charged with a money laundering offense for his alleged use of those funds to purchase a $2.9 million home located on a golf estate in Dubai.

Fraudulent Wound Care

Charges were filed in the District of Arizona and the District of Nevada against seven defendants, including five medical professionals, in connection with approximately $1.1 billion in fraudulent claims to Medicare and other health care benefit programs for amniotic wound allografts. As alleged, certain defendants targeted vulnerable elderly patients, many of whom were receiving hospice care, and applied medically unnecessary amniotic allografts to these patients’ wounds. Many of the allografts allegedly were applied without coordination with the patients’ treating physicians, without proper treatment for infection, to superficial wounds that did not need this treatment, and to areas that far exceeded the size of the wound. Certain defendants allegedly received millions in illegal kickbacks from the fraudulent billing scheme.

Prescription Opioid Trafficking

74 defendants, including 44 licensed medical professionals, were charged across 58 cases in connection with the alleged illegal diversion of over 15 million pills of prescription opioids and other controlled substances. For example, five defendants associated with one Texas pharmacy were charged with the unlawful distribution of over 3 million opioid pills. As alleged, the defendants conspired to distribute massive quantities of oxycodone, hydrocodone, and carisoprodol, which were subsequently trafficked by street-level drug dealers, generating large profits for the defendants. This coordinated action is a continuation of the Health Care Fraud Unit’s systematic approach to stopping drug trafficking organizations and their pharmaceutical wholesale suppliers, which together have fueled an epidemic of prescription opioid abuse for nearly a decade.

DEA also announced today that in the last six months, DEA charged 93 administrative cases seeking the revocation of pharmacies, medical practitioners, and companies authority to handle and/or prescribe controlled substances.

Telemedicine and Genetic Testing Fraud

In today’s Takedown, 49 defendants were charged in connection with the submission of over $1.17 billion in allegedly fraudulent claims to Medicare resulting from telemedicine and genetic testing fraud schemes. For example, in the Southern District of Florida, prosecutors charged an owner of telemedicine and durable medical equipment companies with a $46 million scheme in which Medicare beneficiaries were allegedly targeted through deceptive telemarketing campaigns and then fraudulent claims were submitted to Medicare for durable medical equipment and genetic tests for these beneficiaries. The Department continues to focus on eliminating health care fraud schemes that depend on telemedicine, including schemes involving fraudulent claims for genetic testing, durable medical equipment, and COVID-19 tests.

Other Health Care Fraud Schemes

The other cases announced today charge an additional 170 defendants with various other health care fraud schemes involving over $1.84 billion in allegedly false and fraudulent claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance companies for diagnostic testing, medical visits, and treatments that were medically unnecessary, provided in connection with kickbacks and bribes, or never provided at all. For example, in the Western District of Tennessee, prosecutors charged three defendants, including business owners and a pharmacist, with a $28.7 million scheme to defraud the Federal Employees’ Compensation Fund by allegedly billing for medications for injured United States Postal Service employees that were never prescribed by a licensed practitioner and largely were not dispensed as claimed. And in the Western District of Washington and the Northern District of California, prosecutors charged medical providers with allegedly stealing fentanyl and hydrocodone, respectively, that was meant for the providers’ patients, including child patients in need of anesthesia.

The post DOJ Charges 324 in Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in U.S. History — $14.6 BILLION Scheme Involved 96 Doctors, Nurses, and Pharmacists Targeting Medicare and Medicaid appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

PICTURED: Idaho Sniper Wess Roley, Who Set Fire Before Fatally Gunning Down Two Firefighters in Cold-Blooded Ambush

A 20-year-old man has been named as the suspect in a chilling ambush that left two firefighters dead and one injured on Canfield Mountain.

The Gateway Pundit reported earlier that the suspect has been identified as 20‑year‑old Wess Roley, accused of intentionally setting a brush fire on Sunday, on Canfield Mountain near Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, to lure firefighters into an ambush.

Upon arrival around 2:00 p.m., crews took refuge behind their fire trucks as gunfire erupted from a sniper’s position deep in the woods.

Two firefighters—one from the Coeur d’Alene Fire Department and one from Kootenai County Fire and Rescue—were killed instantly, and a third was critically wounded.

“We do believe that the suspect started the fire, and we do believe that it was an ambush and it was intentional,” Kootenai County Sheriff Bob Norris said during a Sunday night news conference. “These firefighters did not have a chance.”

Norris went on to say that the gunman was apparently hiding in the rugged terrain and using a high-powered rifle. He noted that he instructed deputies to fire back.

Over 300 officers, along with FBI agents and helicopter sharpshooters, swarmed the area. A shelter‑in‑place order was issued as authorities deployed tactical assets.

Roley was later found dead near his weapon after law enforcement. Officials say he acted alone, but whether he died by suicide or police action remains unclear.

Photos of the suspect are now circulating online, as reported by the New York Post.

The post PICTURED: Idaho Sniper Wess Roley, Who Set Fire Before Fatally Gunning Down Two Firefighters in Cold-Blooded Ambush appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Despicable: CNN Promotes a Dangerous Anti-ICE Crowdsourcing App as Immigration Officers Come Under Assault – Trump Admin Responds (VIDEO)

Credit: CNN screenshot

A radical leftist recently introduced an app that will not only help illegal aliens avoid being captured by ICE but also put immigration agents in danger. Not surprisingly, one of America’s worst networks was happy to amplify the app.

During a Monday morning segment, CNN’s John Berman told his audience that a tech developer had developed an app called ICEBlock as a new way to track ICE and oppose the Trump Administration’s migration policies.

“As the Trump Administration steps up ICE raids and mass deportations, one tech developer is pushing back with an app designed to track ICE activity in real-time,” Berman announced. “It’s called ICEBlock and it’s controversial to say the least.

Berman then tuned to CNN writer Clare Duffy, who spoke to Joshua Aaron, the app’s creator. Aaron said he wants the app to be an early warning system for ICE officers’ locations so illegals can evade capture and deportation.

Users can submit ICE sightings and alert others to ICE sightings within 5 miles.

Moreover, the app is free, and users can remain anonymous to avoid detection.

WATCH:

Duffy went on to hail Aaron as someone in the tech industry who is “really resistant” to Trump’s immigration policies. In contrast, many of the most prominent leaders have largely supported the president.

Tricia McLaughlin, the Assistant Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, responded to the ICEBlock app and CNN’s promotion of it during an interview on FOX News.

She told Dana Perino that not only were apps like this obstructing justice, but that they also put our heroic ICE officers in danger.

“Our ICE enforcement officers are seeing a 500% increase in assaults against them,” McLaughlin said. “A lot of this is because politicians like AOC, like Governor Tim Walz, like Gavin Newsom, demonize our ICE enforcement officers and give them (criminals) free passes.”

“Examples like these apps are absolutely obstructing justice,” she added. “What ICE enforcement officers are doing is enforcing the rule of law. If these rioters, these activists, and these politicians don’t like these laws, they should change it.”

“Don’t go after our ICE law enforcement. It’s disgusting, it’s wrong, and it’s un-American.”

The post Despicable: CNN Promotes a Dangerous Anti-ICE Crowdsourcing App as Immigration Officers Come Under Assault – Trump Admin Responds (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WATCH LIVE: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Delivers Briefing as Senate and House Push to Pass Big Beautiful Bill by July 4 – 1 PM ET

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt will brief members of the media today as the Senate and House work to send the One Big Beautiful Bill to the President’s desk this week. 

Leavitt told reporters last week that she is confident Congressional Republicans will send the bill to the President’s desk for a bill signing ceremony this week.

The President has demanded that Republicans pass the bill “ASAP” and wants it done before this Friday, July 4.

The Senate voted to advance the legislation by one vote on Saturday and is now debating the bill and weighing amendments.

Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina were the two Republican nays in Saturday’s vote after Ron Johnson of Wisconsin switched his initial no vote to a yes.

However, the GOP, which holds a 53-seat majority in the upper chamber, is still divided on the bill, with a few RINOs threatening to kill it.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, RINO Thom Tillis, who announced he will not seek reelection after Trump slammed him in a statement, was railing on the Senate Floor against the bill’s cuts to Medicaid for illegal aliens, refugees, and asylum seekers.

RINO on the Loose! Senator Thom Tillis Launches Tirade Against Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ After Announcing Retirement—Says It Will “Break Promises” to Medicaid Recipients

 

Republicans can only afford to lose three votes, creating a potential tiebreaker by Vice President JD Vance.

Today’s briefing also follows a historic SCOTUS decision, reaffirming the rightful balance of power between the judiciary and the executive. In a 6–3 decision, the Court sided with the Trump administration, ruling that federal district courts lack the constitutional or statutory authority to issue so-called ‘universal injunctions’ — sweeping orders that block government policies nationwide, often at the request of left-wing advocacy groups.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, President Trump held a press conference in the briefing room on Friday with Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to celebrate the massive win.

The press briefing is scheduled to begin at 1 pm ET.

Watch live below:

The post WATCH LIVE: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Delivers Briefing as Senate and House Push to Pass Big Beautiful Bill by July 4 – 1 PM ET appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

JUST IN: Trump DOJ Sues Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and City Council Over Its Sanctuary City Policy and Recent Anti-ICE Riots

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass

The Trump Administration is again cracking down on the lawless city of Los Angeles, this time over city officials’ refusal to follow fundamental immigration law.

Fox News’s Matt Finn reported Monday that the Trump DOJ has sued LA Mayor Karen Bass and City Council officials for the city’s sanctuary city policy and the violent riots that broke out weeks ago.

The lawsuit says that LA’s policy of coddling illegal aliens and refusing to turn them over to ICE violates federal law and that direct confrontation with the federal government was inevitable. The suit also notes that L.A. “rushed with urgency” to codify sanctuary law right after Trump was nominated, thwarting what Americans had voted for.

What LA is doing violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution because it refuses to treat federal law enforcement the same as local law enforcement.

Per Bill Melugin of Fox News, here is an excerpt of the lawsuit explaining exactly how:

Sanctuary City laws and policies are designed to deliberately impede federal immigration officers’ ability to carry out their responsibilities in those jurisdictions. The Los Angeles Ordinance and other policies intentionally discriminate against the Federal Government by treating federal immigration authorities differently than other law enforcement agents through access restrictions both to property and to individual detainees, by prohibiting contractors and sub-contractors from providing information, and by disfavoring federal criminal laws that the City of Los Angeles has decided not to comply with.

The Supremacy Clause prohibits the City of Los Angeles and its officials from singling out the Federal Government for adverse treatment—as the challenged law and policies do—thereby discriminating against the Federal Government. Accordingly, the law and policies challenged here are invalid and should be enjoined.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi spoke to Melugin following the announcement of the suit.

“Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles, she said.” Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level – it ends under President Trump.”

One can bet we will get an angry, childish tweet from worthless Governor Gavin Newsom later today.

The post JUST IN: Trump DOJ Sues Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and City Council Over Its Sanctuary City Policy and Recent Anti-ICE Riots appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

‘Donald Trump Notches His Best Week Yet’: Newsweek

President Trump rallies his base (Screen Image: @realdonaldtrump/X)

The Gateway Pundit recognizes President Trump and his administration for achieving a highly, historically successful week in American history.

On Sunday, June 29, Newsweek published the story, ‘Donald Trump Notches His Best Week Yet.’

According to Newsweek:

President Donald Trump is coming off what may be his most successful week in office — perhaps of both terms — with a string of victories that reinforced the speed at which his administration is moving to radically reshape American policy, both foreign and domestic, ahead of a critical summer stretch.

A landmark Supreme Court ruling, a successful NATO summit, a ceasefire that appears to be holding in the Middle East, another peace deal in Africa, a stock market back to setting records, a key trade breakthrough with China — capped off with the surprise emergence of a new political foil — all combined to shift the narrative in his favor.

In a pivotal decision Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court limited the power of individual judges to issue nationwide injunctions, a ruling that Trump hailed as “a monumental victory” that clears the way for his administration to reintroduce contested policies such as ending automatic birthright citizenship.

“We can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies,” a jubilant Trump said from the White House. “Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,” he posted on Truth Social, describing citizenship by birth as “a scam” on the U.S. immigration system.

The court’s 6-3 ruling marks a significant shift in how legal challenges to executive power may proceed, reinforcing Trump’s long-standing criticism that district judges were overstepping their roles.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, Trump hosted leaders from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda at the White House to sign the framework of a peace deal between the African neighbors intended to end a long-running and bloody conflict.

Financial markets responded positively to Trump’s string of policy wins and signs of economic stabilization. The S&P 500 closed at a new high on Friday, driven by investor optimism over the administration’s trade and tax proposals.

Newsweek effectively named the majority of the Trump administration’s historic recent successes while failing to properly emphasize the administration’s most significant accomplishments.

Despite Newsweek publishing ‘Donald Trump Notches His Best Week Yet,’ seven hours after the US Senate agreed on the motion to proceed President Trump’s highly touted “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” Newsweek made no mention of the historic bill in its article.

Perhaps more notably, Newsweek failed to properly emphasize the magnitude of President Trump’s negotiating a ceasefire between Israel and Iran as a truly groundbreaking deal for peace, potentially averting a major Middle Eastern war, US war, or even a third world war.

Per Newsweek:

In the Middle East, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran personally brokered by Trump, held through the week, and U.S. officials offered new details to support the president’s claim that American strikes had crippled key parts of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

“This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,” Trump said at a NATO summit at The Hague, dismissing initial intelligence suggesting a limited impact.

“The bombing rendered the enrichment facility inoperable,” said a joint statement by the White House and the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office.

Iran’s own foreign ministry acknowledged “significant damage.”

On Friday, June 27, President Trump doubled down on his administration’s mission for peace by epically rebuking Iran’s Ali Khamenei’s continued hostility on Truth Social.

True to form as an incomparably original wordsmith, making light of the darkest global situations, President Trump concluded his Truth with a remarkably phrased word of caution to Iran:

“Iran has to get back into the World Order flow, or things will only get worse for them. They are always so angry, hostile, and unhappy, and look at what it has gotten them – A burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and death all around them. They have no hope, and it will only get worse! I wish the leadership of Iran would realize that you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR. PEACE!!!” President Trump said.

Evidently, President Trump will prioritize delivering real peace and prosperity, above all.

 

The post ‘Donald Trump Notches His Best Week Yet’: Newsweek appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NEW: Authorities Identify Gunman Who Murdered Two Heroic Idaho Firefighters in a Wicked Scheme

Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office officers and other members of law enforcement arrive at an active shooting scene in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, on Sunday.

Kootenai County Sheriff's Office officers and other members of law enforcement arrive at an active shooting scene in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, on Sunday.
Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office officers and other members of law enforcement arrive at an active shooting scene in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, on Sunday. (@TheKevinDalton / X screen shot)

The monster who brutally murdered two heroic Idaho firefighters in a wicked scheme has been identified.

A law enforcement official told The Associated Press on Monday they had identified the gunman as Wess Roley.

The official asked to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to discuss the ongoing investigation.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, multiple first responders were hot in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, while responding to a brush fire. Two people were gunned down, and another was injured after a madman ambushed them.

The third firefighter is reportedly “fighting for his life” after surgery and is currently in a stable condition.

FBI assets were deployed to the scene to provide tactical and operational support.

It is believed that Roley set the blaze in the woods as bait for first responders, who responded to the scene at around 2 pm.

As ABC News reported, the incident started after a small but growing brush fire broke out on Canfield Mountain. When fire personnel responded to the blaze, they got shot at by an individual in the woods.

“We do believe that the suspect started the fire, and we do believe that it was an ambush and it was intentional,” Kootenai County Sheriff Bob Norris said during a Sunday night news conference. “These firefighters did not have a chance.”

Norris went on to say that the gunman was apparently hiding in the rugged terrain and using a high-powered rifle. He noted that he instructed deputies to fire back.

The shooter was later found neutralized on Canfield Mountain with a firearm nearby. It’s not clear whether he took his own life or was taken down by law enforcement.

The post NEW: Authorities Identify Gunman Who Murdered Two Heroic Idaho Firefighters in a Wicked Scheme appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On Iran, Trump’s No Change Agent

On Iran, Trump’s No Change Agent

The president acted in line with the decades-old foreign policy consensus he claimed to oppose. 

President Trump Departs Washington For NATO Summit

Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Donald Trump ran for office promising to shake up U.S. grand strategy. 

In Trump’s telling, America’s leaders over the last several decades were too beholden to allied concerns, to the detriment of U.S. interests. And they were too enamored of military force that expended American blood and treasure on peripheral issues. In contrast, Trump suggested a willingness to break with allies when U.S. and partner concerns differed (“they’re screwing us” economically, he famously said of NATO allies), and he conveyed an openness to forgoing military adventures (there would be no “forever wars” on his watch) and instead prioritize diplomacy and negotiation.

In ordering military strikes against the Iranian nuclear program, President Trump has shown that his claim to be a grand-strategic change agent may be overstated.  More than widely appreciated, and though the decision-making process itself was more idiosyncratic and personalistic, Trump’s move largely aligns with the foreign policy mainstream he has long lambasted. The status quo endures.

For decades, the U.S. has focused on curbing nuclear proliferation and embraced a range of both sticks (e.g., sanctions) and carrots (e.g., security guarantees) to this end. In several cases, U.S. leaders have considered the use of force to stop others’ nuclear ambitions. At the height of the Cold War, policymakers in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations explored possible military action against China’s rapidly developing nuclear program. In 1994, the Clinton administration nearly went to war with North Korea over Pyongyang’s nuclear ambitions before a last-minute diplomatic deal was secured. The George W. Bush administration famously argued that the Iraq invasion was needed to ensure Iraq remained non-nuclear, and even politicized intelligence to portray Iraq as further along in its nuclear ambitions than was truly the case. Most recently, both the W. Bush and Obama administrations at least flirted with the idea of attacking Iran’s nuclear program should diplomacy fail. For sure, Trump may be the first U.S. leader to actually authorize an attack to abet nonproliferation (something his supporters say demonstrates his “guts”). Still, the objective itself is straight out of central U.S. foreign policy casting.

Trump has similarly followed his predecessors in equating allied interests—in this case, Israeli interests—with American concerns. To be clear, Israel has real fears about the Iranian nuclear program. After all, not only has the Islamic Republic long threatened Israel with destruction, but Iran has been a major sponsor of terrorist and militia groups such as Hezbollah that have imperiled Israeli security. Coupled with the fact that Israel is the sole nuclear power in the Middle East—meaning Iranian acquisition of a nuclear weapon would restrict Israeli freedom of action and require Jerusalem to focus on nuclear deterrence—and it is unsurprising that Israel has sought to roll back Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Indeed, the combination of these long-standing concerns with the sense that Israel had a window of opportunity to strike Iran seems to have played a major role in spurring Israel to start the current war with Iran.

Still, if not for Trump’s willingness to treat Israeli interests as America’s own, it is difficult to explain the American decision to join the fight. Few actual American interests were at stake. Though the administration has sought to portray Iran as both an “imminent threat” to the U.S. due to its nuclear program and as a legitimate target due to its support for terrorism, neither claim withstands serious scrutiny. No evidence has been offered to demonstrate that Iran was (a) preparing to attack the United States or (b) even moving to develop a nuclear weapon—in fact, U.S. intelligence agencies continue to assess that Iran remains undecided about acquiring nuclear weapons. Moreover, even if Iran had acquired a nuclear weapon, seventy-five years of nuclear politics demonstrates that Washington could have successfully deterred Tehran from contemplating a nuclear strike on the United States. As for terrorism, it is certainly true that Iran supports militant groups, but they are regionally-based and motivated by regional concerns. 

One reason Trump chose to strike Iran anyway, despite a lack of threat to the American homeland, seems to be that he came to equate Israeli and U.S. interests. Following Israel’s initial attack, for instance, Trump began praising the “excellent” and “very successful” military operation and—as the New York Times reports—“hinting that he had much more to do with it than people realized.” As the Israeli campaign continued, Trump’s rhetoric continued to conflate the U.S. and Israel, with Trump even posting online that “We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.” After the U.S. finally intervened, Trump praised the strike as “a great victory for our country”—again, a difficult proposition to entertain given the limited American stakes involved. 

What about prioritizing diplomacy and negotiation over the use of force and avoiding “forever wars”?  At the time of this writing, an Israeli–Iranian ceasefire, after a rough start, seems to be mostly holding. As a result, the United States may have avoided a larger war immediately after the strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Still, we should not lose sight of the fact that, by striking Iran, Trump has effectively undercut a durable diplomatic solution to Iran’s nuclear ambitions while creating conditions that can pull the United States back into conflict with Iran.  

Before the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, negotiations were underway between American and Iranian officials to create a successor to the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal. Public accounts suggest that Trump simply decided that the process was not generating the results he wanted in a timeframe he found acceptable—as one senior official described it, Trump came to “a feeling” that diplomacy would not yield the outcome he sought. In ordering strikes under these circumstances, however, the administration seems to have overlooked that negotiations are just that—the other side gets a vote, and no one party gets to set the pace of events or impose agreement to its demands.  

Having now attacked Iran, the Trump team has reduced the prospects for a long-term, stable deal. Not only does Iran have vivid evidence that the U.S. may not be a faithful and reliable negotiating partner, but Trump’s allusions to regime change give Tehran even more reasons to acquire a nuclear option. Indeed, there are already credible reports that the strikes did less damage to Iran’s nuclear program than the administration claims and that Tehran may be preparing to develop nuclear weapons with its remaining assets if not restart its nuclear program. To keep Iran from going nuclear, the U.S. must therefore overcome starker Iranian mistrust and reasons to race for a nuclear deterrent—or be willing to strike again. In either scenario, the result limits the space for diplomacy and creates a continued inclination to rely on military force, potentially fostering a slow-burning forever confrontation. Not coincidentally, it also keeps the U.S. more engaged with Middle Eastern affairs than would otherwise be the case and constrains U.S. opportunities for shifting attention to other theaters.

Taken as a whole, the result poses problems for claims pushed by both Trump’s supporters and his critics that the present administration is altering the foundation of U.S. grand strategy. Change the names of those signing the military orders and appearing on the news shows, and recent events could just as readily have occurred under the Bush, Obama, or Biden administrations. Indeed, one thing that unites each of those presidents is that they, unlike Trump, refused to strike Iran despite pressure at home and abroad to do so.

Of course, the Trump administration is not even six months old—time will tell if future policy choices take the U.S. in new and improved strategic directions. For now, however, the Washington foreign policy establishment can rejoice: In attacking Iran, President Trump has acted fully in line with the foreign policy consensus.

The post On Iran, Trump’s No Change Agent appeared first on The American Conservative.

Woke MSNBC Host Throws Tantrum & Slams Desk On Live TV | Drew Hernandez

Symone Sanders Townsend, MSNBC’s DEI host, threw an epic tantrum on air, slamming her desk like a toddler, all because the Supreme Court dared to rule correctly on Trump’s birthright citizenship order. She screeched that questioning the 14th Amendment’s constitutionality was “insane,” as if she knows what the constitution even says or means. For being as woke as she is, it’s insane she has no idea that the 14th amendment is about children born to slaves at the time of its writing, not children born to illegal aliens today.

Apparently, Symone thinks flailing her arms and slamming her desk makes her a constitutional scholar. If Symone wants to lecture about “crazy,” she should look in a mirror mid-desk slam. Clearly, President Trump has broken these people.

Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!

Follow Drew on X: https://x.com/DrewHLive
Follow Drew on Rumble: https://rumble.com/DrewHernandez

The post Woke MSNBC Host Throws Tantrum & Slams Desk On Live TV | Drew Hernandez appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump’s New Official Portrait and His Inaugural Portrait: Authentic Masterpieces – Art Analysis

President Trump’s Second Inaugural Portrait (Daniel Torok/White House)

In June, 2025, The White House unveiled President Trump’s Official Portrait for his second term as president.

President Trump’s second term Official Portrait was well-received, although supporters equally revered President Trump’s iconic portrait from January, 2025.

Observe the two masterpieces below.

Chief White House Photographer Daniel Torok is credited with both historic portraits, which will be viewed by billions of people in the coming centuries.

Torok explained on Instagram that his spectacular portrait from January, 2025, which pays homage to President Trump’s famous mug shot taken in Fulton County, Georgia, will, in fact, be classified as President Trump’s Inaugural Portrait, whereas Torok’s latest portrait will be classified as President Trump’s Official Portrait.

Torok assured supporters that all presidential administrations take both portraits: a standard procedure. In other words, President Trump’s impeccably lit Inaugural Portrait still holds its place in the official US archives, and in the history books.

As battle-hardened and determined as President Trump appears in his 2025 Inaugural Portrait, he appears equally statesmanlike and sage-like in his new Official Portrait.

Essentially, Torok and The White House have offered a rare glimpse into the side of President Trump that his supporters often hear about, yet do not see.

In his second term Official Portrait, President Trump can be viewed as the statesman; the sage; the father; the grandfather; the diplomat.

Any valid historian of President Trump’s will recognize that, above all, President Trump prioritizes peace and prosperity, at home, and abroad. President Trump’s second term Official Portrait pristinely indicates his undying quest for peace.

Still, President Trump stands among the select few American figures to walk through such a radically blazing political fire, and survive to lead the nation.

Observe the stark difference between President Trump’s jovial first term Official Portrait, and his thundering 2025 Inaugural Portrait.

 

President Trump has now endured multiple assassination attempts, and relentless assassinations to his character through fraudulent impeachments, fraudulent indictments, fraudulent investigations, and a stolen presidential election.

Would you be smiling?

In June, 2025, while delivering a historic record for American peace and prosperity, President Trump smiled glowingly for his second term Official Portrait.

In the words of President Trump’s revered Frank Sinatra, “That’s life… You’re riding high in April; shot down in May. But I know I’m gonna change that tune. When I’m back on top, back on top in June.”

The post President Trump’s New Official Portrait and His Inaugural Portrait: Authentic Masterpieces – Art Analysis appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.