On this episode of Stinchfield, we break down the DOJ’s stunning move to quietly close the Epstein case—without releasing the files, without naming names, and without answering to the American people. The outrage is real and justified. Conservatives across the country are demanding answers, and the Department of Justice is giving them stone-cold silence.
Even more shocking? Former State Department official Mike Benz has come forward on “Stinchfield” with a chilling explanation: releasing the Epstein files could possibly jeopardize current Middle East peace negotiations. That’s right—according to Benz, the U.S. government may be sacrificing truth and justice in the name of geopolitical stability. So the question becomes: who is the DOJ really protecting?
We also expose the deep, long-standing ties between Jeffrey Epstein and the CIA, a connection most media outlets refuse to even mention. From sweetheart deals to shadowy intelligence links, this wasn’t just a trafficking operation—it was a blackmail machine operating with protection from the highest levels of government.
Why was Epstein allowed to operate in plain sight? Who were his clients? And why does the government seem more concerned with protecting the guilty than defending the victims?
Former US Secretary of State John Kerry spoke with BBC special correspondent James Naughtie and shared a message certain to earn him cold looks at his next globalist cocktail party.
Kerry told Naughtie that his fellow Democrats allowed the US-Mexico border to be “under siege” during Biden’s presidency and that his party “missed” on the issue of immigration for years.
Kerry added that he tried to convince Biden that immigration and the U.S.-Mexico border needed to be addressed.
“I said this very directly to President Biden, that I think the Democrats missed on the issue of immigration for some years,” Kerry told the BBC.
“They just allowed the border to continue to be sieged.”
“The first thing any president should say – or anybody in public life – is without a border protected, you don’t have a nation,” Kerry said. “I wish President Biden had been heard more often saying, I’m going to enforce the law.”
Such words have been a familiar refrain for Trump during his time in national politics and were included in the 2024 Republican Party policy platform.
But Democrats – many of whom advocate more relaxed immigration laws and a pathway to citizenship for undocumented migrants – attempted to portray Trump’s positions as harsh and discriminatory.
According to Kerry, that was a mistake.
“Trump was right,” Kerry said. “The problem is we all should have been right.”
A Jewish GOP congressman sparked a meltdown from Congressional Democrats after posting a savage statement regarding anti-Semitic Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) comment about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Omar on Tuesday threw a fit on X over Netanyahu’s most recent visit to D.C., calling him a “war criminal” and demanding he be prosecuted.
This is Benjamin Netanyahu’s third visit to DC this year.
War criminals should not be welcomed by any president or Congress.
He should be held accountable for his crimes, not platformed. Beyond shameful.
Upon seeing this tweet, Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) unleashed a devastating response.
“I’m sure it is difficult to see us welcome the killer of so many of your fellow Muslim terrorists,” he wrote. “The only shame is you serve in Congress.”
I’m sure it is difficult to see us welcome the killer of so many of your fellow Muslim terrorists.
Following Fine’s clapback, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-NY), and House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (D-CA) released a joint statement calling his comments “unhinged, racist, and Islamophobic” while implying he was inciting violence.
Our statement in connection with Randy Fine’s Islamophobic attack on Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. pic.twitter.com/Wxnlzv1elh
Other Democrats echoed their leadership’s whining, with some like Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ) going even further by painting Fine as the quintessential ‘ugly Republican.’
Randy Fine is a vile racist whose presence in Congress is an insult to every decent American.
When you think of Republicans, remember Randy Fine eats at their table.
— Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (@RepBonnie) July 9, 2025
Randy Fine’s vile, racist attack on Rep. Omar is beneath the dignity of the House. His remarks are an affront to the fundamental values of the American Jewish community, and do not reflect the basic standards of decency expected of any elected official.
Islamophobia has no place in our country. Rep. Randy Fine’s comments are vile, racist, and beneath an elected official who serves in the people’s house. This kind of bigotry should not be tolerated. pic.twitter.com/CfkU2G6wJK
— Congresswoman Mary Gay Scanlon (@RepMGS) July 10, 2025
Rep. Omar is a brave & principled public servant who fights every day for peace, justice, & the American people.
Rep. Fine is a shameless bigot using Islamophobic hate speech to score points just weeks after a political assassination.
The FBI has officially closed its long-running investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s sordid network—declaring that no charges will be brought against Prince Andrew, effectively clearing him for international travel after years of alleged self‑imposed exile.
Dubbed “Air Miles Andy” for his taxpayer-funded shopping trips abroad during his tenure as UK trade envoy, Andrew dramatically halted international travel six years ago amid fears he could face arrest in the U.S.
His only known post‑scandal trip came in 2022, flying to Bahrain in private — all while rumours mounted that he was using his connections to profit via his defunct Pitch@Palace enterprise, according to The Sun.
According to a leaked memo, federal agents will not be bringing any charges against Andrew, despite his long history of ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The Duke of York, now 65, had essentially confined himself to the UK for over half a decade, reportedly fearing international arrest or legal action if he traveled.
PRINCE Andrew can end his self-imposed travel ban and return to being “Air Miles Andy” after a leaked memo revealed the FBI is closing its investigation into his Jeffrey Epstein links.
The terrified Duke, 65, has hunkered down at Royal Lodge in Windsor for six years fearing arrest if he left the UK.
A friend said: “He has been abroad once since the scandal erupted.
“He has always been very nervous about going abroad and felt he’d always be looking over his shoulder as he could be subject to civil action or at worst, being arrested.
“Hopefully with this out of the way it means he can at least leave the country.
“What’s he supposed to do with the rest of his life? He hasn’t been convicted of any crime and can’t sit around doing nothing at Royal Lodge forever.”
In May, the O’Keefe Media Group released an explosive undercover video of John Bryan, a royal family advisor, exposing Prince Andrew’s sexual relations with minors and ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
In revelation caught on hidden camera by O’Keefe Media Group (OMG), American businessman and long-time royal insider John Bryan has come forward with damning claims about Prince Andrew’s personal relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Bryan, a trusted advisor to the Duke of York, also alleged that Prince Andrew lied to him about his involvement in sexual misconduct with minors.
“I knew he [Prince Andrew] saw him [Jeffrey Epstein],” said Bryan, “But he lied to me that he was such a close friend,” revealed Bryan, referring to Prince Andrew’s personal relationship with Epstein.
After Prince Andrew’s 2019 BBC interview, where he denied knowing Virginia Giuffre and famously claimed he was physically incapable of sweating, Bryan says he was quietly brought into “Royal Lodge,” Andrew’s private residence, to provide “crisis” management advice. In a previous interview with the New York Post, Bryan revealed “They [the British Royal Family] brought me in to help him [Andrew].” Bryan told the publication, “Andrew was so distressed, he wasn’t able to focus for more than 40 minutes.”
According to previous reporting by The Daily Mail, Bryan also admitted to crafting a five-page PR strategy titled the “House of Kroy,” advising Andrew to publicly express sympathy for victims of Jeffrey Epstein while maintaining his own innocence. At the time, Bryan publicly supported the Prince, stating, “I believe Prince Andrew is innocent.”
“I did a big thing in The Daily Mail saying that I believed Andrew,” Bryan recounted to our undercover OMG journalist, adding, “And then I found out he was lying. I was so pissed.” When asked what Andrew had lied about, Bryan didn’t mince words: “That he was fucking underage girls. That’s not cool.”
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has officially granted full approval to Moderna’s controversial mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax, for children as young as 6 months old through 11 years of age who are deemed “at increased risk” of COVID-19.
The vaccine was previously available to kids under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), but the FDA has now handed over full approval, greenlighting the use of the experimental shot despite growing evidence of adverse events, including myocarditis, pericarditis, allergic reactions, and even seizures in young recipients.
“COVID-19 continues to pose a significant potential threat to children, especially those with underlying medical conditions. Vaccination can be an important tool for protecting our youngest against severe disease and hospitalization,” said Stéphane Bancel, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna.
“We appreciate the FDA’s diligent scientific review and approval of Spikevax for pediatric populations at increased risk for COVID-19 disease.”
While the media parrots talking points about “protecting vulnerable children,” the fine print tells a different story:
Myocarditis and pericarditis risks are highest in males ages 12 to 24—and Moderna wants to jab children as young as 6 months.
Adverse reactions include: seizures, chest pain, shortness of breath, vomiting, and even fainting.
Parents are told to “stay nearby for up to an hour” after their child’s injection—just in case their toddler has a severe allergic reaction or passes out.
The vaccine may not protect all recipients, yet Moderna continues pushing forward with mass vaccination.
So why is the FDA pushing full approval for a shot that hasn’t even existed long enough to study long-term side effects in children?
SPIKEVAX (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is a vaccine to protect you against COVID-19. SPIKEVAX is for people who are:
65 years of age and older, or
6 months through 64 years of age at high risk for severe COVID-19.
Vaccination with SPIKEVAX may not protect all people who receive the vaccine.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
You or your child should not get SPIKEVAX if you had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose of SPIKEVAX or any Moderna COVID-19 vaccine or to any ingredient in these vaccines.
What are the risks of SPIKEVAX?
There is a very small chance that SPIKEVAX could cause a severe allergic reaction. A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to 1 hour after getting a dose of SPIKEVAX. For this reason, the healthcare provider may ask you or your child to stay for a short time at the place where you or your child received your vaccine. Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include:
Trouble breathing
Swelling of your face and throat
A fast heartbeat
A rash all over your body
Dizziness and weakness
Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have occurred most commonly in males 12 years through 24 years of age. You should seek medical attention right away if you or your child has any of the following symptoms after receiving Spikevax, particularly during the 2 weeks after receiving a dose of the vaccine: chest pain, shortness of breath, feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart. Additional symptoms in children may include fainting, irritability, poor feeding, lack of energy, vomiting, pain in the abdomen, or cool, pale skin.
Other side effects that have been reported include:
Injection site reactions: pain, tenderness and swelling of the lymph nodes in the same arm of the injection or in the groin, swelling (hardness), and redness
General side effects: fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, chills, nausea and vomiting, fever, rash, irritability/crying, sleepiness, and loss of appetite.
Fainting and febrile seizures (convulsions during a fever) were also reported
Tell the healthcare provider about all of your or your child’s medical conditions, including if you or your child:
have any allergies
had a severe allergic reaction after receiving a previous dose of any COVID-19 vaccine
have had myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) or pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart)
have a fever
have a bleeding disorder or are on a blood thinner
are immunocompromised or on a medicine that affects your immune system
are pregnant or plan to become pregnant
are breastfeeding
have received any other COVID-19 vaccine
have ever fainted in association with an injection
These may not be all the possible side effects of SPIKEVAX. Ask your healthcare provider about any side effects that concern you. You may report side effects to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) at 1-800-822-7967 or http://vaers.hhs.gov.
On Wednesday evening, it was reported that six Secret Service personnel connected to the Trump assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, last July have been suspended.
Would-be assassin Thomas Crooks was able to climb on top of a roof next to Trump’s Butler, Pennsylvania rally and put Trump in his scope.
A bullet grazed President Trump’s ear on July 13, 2024 during his Pennsylvania rally. One rallygoer was fatally struck in the head. Two other rally attendees were wounded, one critically.
This is the full clip.
1- shots on trump 2- ss returns fire 3- you hear “shooter is down” 4- they stand trump up 5- he asks to get his shoes 6- fist pumps and fight
A Secret Service sniper fatally shot Thomas Matthew Crooks after he took several shots at Trump and rallygoers.
The so-called ‘security lapses’ and circumstances surrounding the assassination attempt against Trump raise questions about how Thomas Matthew Crooks was able to pull everything off by himself.
Would-be Trump assassin and murderer Thomas Brooks lays dead on the roof after federal agents shot him in Butler, Pennsylvania. But only after he allegedly fired 8 shots at President Trump.
Nearly a year later, six USSS personnel were suspended without pay.
The identities of the suspended agents were not disclosed Wednesday evening.
CBS News reported that the six Secret Service personnel were suspended without pay for up to six weeks then placed into restricted duty roles “with less operational responsibility.”
“We aren’t going to fire our way out of this,” Matt Quinn, Secret Service Deputy Director said in an interview CBS News. “We’re going to focus on the root cause and fix the deficiencies that put us in that situation.”
“Secret Service is totally accountable for Butler,” Quinn said. “Butler was an operational failure and we are focused today on ensuring that it never happens again.”
WATCH:
EXCLUSIVE: The Secret Service suspended six personnel without pay as the agency faced intense scrutiny after the assassination attempt against President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, nearly a year ago.
On Thursday the names of the suspended Secret Service agents were revealed.
RealClearPolitics reporter Susan Crabtree identified the agents suspended and revealed the key supervisors who signed off on the final security walkthrough on Butler security plan were never disciplined.
“One of those supervisors on the final walkthroughs, Nick Menster, was assigned this year as the No. 2 in charge of the Lara and Eric Trump protective detail. The other, Nick Olszewski, ironically, became the chief (special agent in charge) of the Inspection Division, which is responsible for ensuring the accountability and integrity of the agency’s personnel and operations,” Susan Crabtree said.
“Inexperienced agents positioned for failure and a more senior agent who spoke out about the ambiguity about the AGR roof coverage, according to Secret Service sources and Congressional testimony, are taking the fall,” she said.
The suspended agents might file a lawsuit against the agency.
Three of the six who are taking the fall (unpaid suspension) are:
Myotsoty Perez – an inexperienced agent (according to Congressional testimony, which did not name her) who was the “site agent” in charge of the security for the rally. She was part of the regular Donald Trump detail and was not chosen for the big outdoor J13 rally, but simply had her “rotation” come up, according to multiple Secret Service sources.
Meredith Bank – a far more experienced agent out of the Pittsburgh Field Office who was serving as the “lead agent” for the day of the rally – overseeing operations from the time then-candidate Trump arrived at the airport to the final departure. She told Congressional investigators that she informed Perez that her supervisor, Nick Menster, would be asking her where the local law enforcement were to be positioned in/on the AGR building. Menster, however, never specifically asked that question, according to the Congressional transcripts.
Dana Dubrey – a mid-level agent in the Pittsburgh Field Office who served as the “site counterpart.”
Tim Burke – the chief (special agent in charge) of the Pittsburgh Field Office.
Brian Pardini – the No. 2 in charge of the Pittsburgh Field Office.
John Marciniak – the Uniformed Division counter sniper who was assigned to the rally late because of the Iranian threat to Trump’s life. Marciniak had just two days, instead of the customary five, to formulate his security plan.
EXCLUSIVE AND #BREAKING: The real story behind the six Secret Service suspensions over Butler failures: Key supervisors who signed off on the Butler security plan and two who were on the final walkthroughs before the J13 rally were never disciplined but instead received BIG… pic.twitter.com/DxslFOI8CI
Screenshot of Bill O’Reilly via News Nation YouTube Channel
Former primetime Fox News host Bill O’Reilly has claimed in a recent interview with Chris Cuomo that President Trump explained his rationale to him for why the Epstein Files must not be released.
In the interview with News Nation, Cuomo asked O’Reilly what his view was on the Trump administration’s “botched” Epstein file rollout.
O’Reilly responded, “I talked to President Trump, man-to-man, eye-to-eye, on St. Patrick’s Day about this. And he said, ‘There are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein’s conduct.”
O’Reilly added, “They maybe had lunch with them or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another.”
“Those people are destroyed, because there’s not going to be any context. The media doesn’t care about context, so you can’t do that. You can’t destroy a human being by putting out the files, whatever they may be,” concluded O’Reilly.
Interestingly, Barron Trump’s close friend Bo Loudon shared the interview clip.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Bill O’Reilly just revealed he had a recent “man to man” talk with President Trump about the Epstein files.
According to O’Reilly, Trump believes releasing the Epstein files would allow the media to smear innocent people. pic.twitter.com/sIDXccODtr
Former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly said he discussed the Jeffrey Epstein case in March with President Trump, who told him there are “a lot of names associated” with the disgraced financier for innocuous reasons.
“I talked to President Trump, man-to-man, eye-to-eye, on St. Patrick’s Day about this. … And he said — and I agree — ‘There are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein’s conduct,’” O’Reilly said Wednesday during an appearance on NewsNation’s “Cuomo.”
“They maybe had lunch with them or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another,” he told host Chris Cuomo.“If that name gets out,” O’Reilly continued, “those people are destroyed, because there’s not going to be any context. Media doesn’t care about context, so, you can’t do that. You can’t destroy a human being by putting out the files, whatever they may be.”
O’Reilly’s claims are very similar to what Trump shared in an interview with Fox News before being elected.
When Fox & Friends hosts asked if he planned to release the JFK files, he clearly responded, “Yes.”
However, when they asked if he planned to release the Epstein files, he said “Yeah” but added “That less so, because you don’t want to affect people’s lives if there’s phony stuff in there.”
WATCH:
DONALD TRUMP DIDN’T WANT TO RELEASE EPSTEIN FILES BECAUSE OF ‘PHONEY STUFF’
When the story of the Marc Rich pardon broke, the American public was stunned—not just by the audacity of the pardon itself, but by the web of influence, money, and connections that seemed to insulate the powerful from accountability. At the center of the post-pardon investigation stood James Comey, a man who would later become a household name for his roles in other political dramas. Yet, in this case, Comey’s investigation stopped short of the most glaring conflicts: the intersection of political fundraising, government contracts, and the profit-driven world of mental health care.
Beth Dozoretz, a prominent Democratic fundraiser and close Clinton ally, played a pivotal role in the campaign for Rich’s pardon. Her husband, Psychiatrist, Dr. Ronald Dozoretz, was the founder of ValueOptions, one of the largest mental health managed care companies in America—a company that, during this period, secured billions in government contracts. The Dozoretz family’s political connections and financial interests were clear, yet Comey’s investigation focused narrowly on whether the pardon itself was “bought” with donations, ignoring the broader implications of political access and government reliance on ValueOptions.
Why did Comey’s probe fail to address these obvious intersections? Was it legal caution, political calculation, or a willful blindness to the realities of elite privilege? The result was the same: the investigation left untouched the deeper questions of how political insiders profit from government largesse—while millions of vulnerable Americans, especially children, suffer the consequences.
The mental health industry, dominated by companies like ValueOptions, has long been plagued by scandals:
Wrongful diagnoses and overmedication of children, often driven by profit motives and a lack of scientific rigor.
Billions in taxpayer dollars funneled to providers with questionable track records and political connections.
A system that rewards volume over quality, leaving countless families struggling with the fallout of unnecessary drugging and ineffective care.
The elite seem to escape the obvious, protected by their networks and, perhaps, by investigators like James Comey who are unwilling or unable to connect the dots. Is James Comey truly so naïve—or do we simply choose to forget the failures that allow power and profit to capture the justice system and put public health at risk?
As millions of children continue to be misdiagnosed and medicated, and as billions in public funds flow to politically connected companies, the unanswered questions from the Marc Rich pardon investigation remain a stark reminder: in America, the rules are different for the elite. And too often, those tasked with holding them accountable look the other way.
But organizations like AbleChild stand as a warning and a promise: regardless of who you are, you will be held to account for the massive drugging of American children. AbleChild, a national nonprofit founded by parents, has long fought to expose how the mental health industry lobbied for government grants, conducted clinical drug trials on children, and revamped educational models to push subjective psychiatric labels and drug “treatments” onto vulnerable youth—all while companies with huge government contracts walked away unexamined during investigations like the one into a “bought” pardon.
AbleChild’s mission is clear: to ensure that every child’s rights are protected, that informed consent is respected, and that no amount of political influence or government funding can shield those responsible for the harm caused by wrongful psychiatric labeling and over-medication. The era of looking the other way must end—because the well-being of America’s children is not for sale.
AbleChild is a 501(3) C nonprofit organization that has recently co-written landmark legislation in Tennessee, setting a national precedent for transparency and accountability in the intersection of mental health, pharmaceutical practices, and public safety.
What you can do. Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!
Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive.
As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives.
The Houston pediatrician terminated after posting a malicious comment about the Texas flooding victims has broken her days-long silence.
As The Gateway Pundit reported on Sunday, Christina B. Propst gloated about the 94 innocent souls in Kerr County that were killed over the Fourth of July weekend by flooding from the Guadalupe River.
Among the fatalities and missing are young girls from Camp Mystic, a Christian summer camp located near Hunt, where at least 27 campers and counselors perished.
Worse, at least 161 people are known to be missing in Kerr County, so the death toll will likely rise.
“May all visitors, children, non-MAGA voters, and pets be safe and dry,” Propst wrote on Facebook. “Kerr County MAGA voted to gut FEMA. They deny climate change. May they get what they voted for. Bless their hearts.”
Credit: Chris Tina Facebook screenshot
Following the national outrage, Propst’s employer, Blue Fish Pediatrics, condemned her comment and said she had been placed on leave. The practice then later added that Porpst was no longer employed.
In a letter obtained by KPRC, Propst claimed she took “full responsibility” for her wicked comment and claimed she made it before knowing the extent of lives lost.
She issued a groveling apology, claiming she made her comments from a “place of frustration” and adding that they did not represent her true character.
Propst also asked individuals not to target her former employer.
I speak to you as a mother, a neighbor, a pediatrician, and a human being who is deeply sorry. I take full responsibility for a social media comment I made before we knew that so many precious lives were lost to the terrible tragedy in Central Texas. I understand my comment caused immense pain to those suffering indescribable grief and for that I am truly sorry. I would like to make clear that my regrettable comment was in no way a response to the tragic loss of human life. But the words written were mine and regardless of how they are being presented, that is a fact that I deeply regret.
I want to apologize to each and every individual suffering through terrible loss in this difficult time. As news of heartbreaking fatalities became clear I immediately removed my thoughtless comment, as it does not reflect the depth of my compassion or the respect I have for each and every human life. Unfortunately, my online comment is now being shared with the false impression that I made it after the devastating loss of life was known. I did not. But again, the comment was mine and mine alone. Even in these divisive times, some things are and should remain sacred. Human life is sacred. The well-being of children is sacred.
Politics and party affiliation should never affect the judgment or actions of any medical provider and have never affected mine. Anyone who has sat in my office, cried on my shoulder in moments of loss, afforded me the privilege of helping their child grow, or trusted me with their child’s life knows that I am tirelessly committed to children’s medical care and would never be so callous as to make such a remark about lives cut so terribly short. I did not choose my words with the sensitivity the moment required, or with any awareness of the heartbreaking loss that would later become clear to all of us.
My comment came from a place of frustration —born of my belief that our communities, first responders, healthcare system, early-warning systems and disaster infrastructure need more and better support and funding to help prevent and respond to tragedies such as this. But my poor choice of words has been perceived as a response to this tragedy, and for that I am deeply sorry. I respectfully ask that no responsibility or harassment be directed toward my former employer. They are kind, hard-working, dedicated pediatricians who had no role in this whatsoever.
Perhaps my biggest regret is that my words are now serving as a distraction from our shared responsibility to heal the pain and suffering of those whose lives have been forever changed by unspeakable loss, and to take every step to ensure such a disaster never occurs again. One thing on which we can all agree: The heart of every Texan breaks for each and every family shattered by this tragedy. I pray that those who are suffering find peace and comfort in the difficult days ahead and commit myself to helping the entire community heal and recover. Moving forward, I will do my very best to listen, learn, grow and serve my community as I have always done. Because that is really who I am.
With deep regret, Christina Propst, MD July 8, 2025
President Donald Trump has officially thrown his weight behind RINO Lindsey Graham—whose record includes climate pandering, open-borders showmanship, and globe-trotting war-baiting—in the 2026 Senate race.
“Happy Birthday to Senator Lindsey Graham!” Trump posted, along with a smiling golf-course photo of the two. “He is always there when I need him, and I hope everyone in the Great State of South Carolina will help Lindsey have a BIG WIN in his re-election bid next year.”
But if the goal was to rally the MAGA faithful around the career politician, Trump may be in for a surprise.
Screenshot: Truth Social
“Thank you, Mr. President! This means a great deal to me. I love being in the fight with you to save our country. You are the right man at the right time for our nation and the world,” Graham responded on X.
Thank you, Mr. President!
This means a great deal to me. I love being in the fight with you to save our country.
Lindsey Graham, who has held office since 2003, is seeking a fifth six-year term in 2026, but his approval rating has been circling the drain.
According to The Independent, a recent Winthrop University poll showed him at just 34%, far behind South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster and Senator Tim Scott.
Despite Trump’s backing, many grassroots conservatives are asking why the leader of the America First movement is aligning himself with a man who has repeatedly sided with Democrats on key issues like immigration, climate change, and foreign wars.
Trump’s entire MAGA movement was sold to the public as a complete break from the political establishments of the Republican and Democrat parties.
His endorsement of Deep State swamp scum like Lindsey Graham is a total betrayal of his base and the principles he once proclaimed. https://t.co/0Dq5m5pscC
Endorsing Lindsey Graham for reelection is like endorsing Pam Bondi to remain as Attorney General.
He’s a backstabbing warmongering traitor. South Carolina can do better than him. There’s America First candidates that can win because SC is a RED state. Lady G must go! pic.twitter.com/4JQyswjZyK
