China Arrests Top General, Why This Purge Is Different

Chinese President Xi Jinping greets military personnel during a ceremony, surrounded by applauding officers in uniforms, showcasing support and unity within the armed forces.

Chinese President Xi Jinping greets military personnel during a ceremony, surrounded by applauding officers in uniforms, showcasing support and unity within the armed forces.
Chinese President Xi Jinping, also general secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission, meets with representatives of military personnel stationed in Xizang, in Lhasa, southwest China’s Xizang Autonomous Region, Aug. 20, 2025. (Xinhua/Li Gang)

 

China announced investigations on January 24–25, 2026, into two of the highest-ranking military leaders in the country: General Zhang Youxia, vice chairman of the Central Military Commission and the highest-ranking uniformed officer below Xi Jinping, and General Liu Zhenli, chief of the CMC’s Joint Staff Department. In China, once a cadre is placed under investigation, guilt is almost inevitable, with punishments ranging from lengthy imprisonment to life sentences or execution in severe cases.

The move reduced the Central Military Commission, the Chinese Communist Party’s supreme military leadership body, from its usual seven members to just Xi and General Zhang Shengmin. This represents the highest proportion of vacancies on the CMC since the Mao period.

Zhang Youxia, 75, was widely regarded as politically untouchable. A longtime confidant of Xi with family ties dating back to the revolutionary era, he was also one of the few senior People’s Liberation Army (PLA) commanders with real combat experience from China’s 1979 war with Vietnam.

Previous purges, including those carried out by Xi earlier in his career, typically targeted cadres loyal to rival factions or to former leaders and were formally framed as corruption cases. Charges usually involved bribery, embezzlement, or “serious violations of discipline and law,” the CCP’s standard euphemism for corruption.

In some cases, financial misconduct overlapped with politics through accusations of building patronage networks or independent power bases, but the public justification remained rooted in economic wrongdoing.

This case is different. Zhang Youxia is the highest-ranking figure purged so far and was widely viewed as personally loyal to Xi. The current wave targets Xi’s own appointees, figures long regarded as politically untouchable. Unlike earlier purges, there have been no direct public accusations of financial corruption. Instead, state media and PLA Daily editorials accuse Zhang of political betrayal and of undermining Xi’s authority over the armed forces.

Xi Jinping’s rise to power has been closely tied to his anti-corruption campaign. Xi assumed the post of General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and Chairman of the Central Military Commission on November 15, 2012, at the 18th Party Congress, and was elected President of the People’s Republic of China on March 14, 2013. He succeeded Hu Jintao, who warned at the same Party Congress that systemic corruption could lead to the downfall of both the CCP and the Chinese state.

Xi launched the anti-corruption campaign immediately after taking office. In one of his first speeches as Party General Secretary on November 15, 2012, he described corruption as an existential threat to Party rule. Within days, he pledged to crack down on both “tigers and flies,” referring to senior officials and low-level cadres alike, stating that the Party must pursue violations of discipline and law by leading officials as well as corruption that directly harmed the people’s interests.

The campaign became the most extensive and systematic anti-corruption effort in the history of CCP governance. Between 2013 and the present, the Central Discipline Inspection Commission and its successor, the National Supervisory Commission, have punished more than 6.27 million Party members and approximately 2.3 million government officials. Those punished include 65 high-ranking officials classified as “tigers” and nearly a dozen vice-ministerial-level officials.

The campaign also extended deeply into the People’s Liberation Army. More than 200,000 military personnel, including at least 17 generals, have been investigated, with nearly all cases resulting in guilty findings and severe punishment. The purge has reached the very top of the military establishment, with three consecutive defense ministers removed or placed under investigation: General Wei Fenghe, expelled in June 2024; General Li Shangfu, expelled in June 2024 after serving only seven months; and the current defense minister, General Dong Jun, who has recently been placed under investigation.

According to official statements, Zhang is accused of having “seriously trampled on and undermined the system of ultimate responsibility resting with the CMC chairman,” language that directly references Xi’s personal authority. Additional accusations claim that his actions “severely fueled political and corruption problems that threaten the Communist Party’s absolute leadership over the armed forces and undermine the Party’s governance foundation,” and that he “gravely betrayed the trust placed in them by the CPC Central Committee and the CMC.”

Further statements allege that Zhang “severely damaged the political and ideological foundation of unity and progress among all military personnel” and “inflicted grave harm on efforts to strengthen political loyalty in the military.”

The political rhetoric used to justify these purges suggests two possibilities. Either Xi Jinping fears an internal challenge and is preemptively eliminating potential rivals, or he has become so powerful that he can remove anyone without fear of reprisal. What remains unclear is whether Xi will appoint replacements in the near term or wait until 2027, when a new Communist Party Central Committee is scheduled to be selected.

Some analysts argue there is no immediate pressure to fill the vacant positions and that the Central Military Commission can continue operating under Xi’s direct control for the foreseeable future. Regardless of timing, the removal of top military leaders has consolidated Xi’s authority by reducing layers of command between himself and the officers responsible for launching missiles or deploying ships.

 

The post China Arrests Top General, Why This Purge Is Different appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

WAYNE ROOT: Winning the Midterms is All About PR. PR is Everything. So Where are the Families of Illegal Alien Murder, Rape & Assault Victims? Where are the Parents of Children Killed by Drugs?

By Wayne Allyn Root

My fans know although I’m an opinion guy…with lots of opinions…perhaps more opinions than anyone on earth. That’s why I’m called, “The biggest MAGA mouth in America.”

But I’m also an idea man. I’ve got loads of ideas and solutions. Because opinions are a dime a dozen- everyone with a big mouth has one. But solutions are rare. Solutions are one-in-a-million.

Solutions are priceless.

As most of you know, I’ve written about, and talked about, and recommended many different solutions for the illegal alien foreign invasion and ICE deportation crisis we are in.

My solutions have ranged from…

*Do not send ICE into blue cities run by Democrats. Start with the low hanging fruit- red cities and red states with Republican Governors, Mayors and police chiefs, who will cooperate with ICE, and provide security for ICE.

We have tens of millions of illegal aliens in the USA. We only have 22,000 ICE agents. We have to be selective. Why not start where we are welcomed? Why not start where we are treated like heroes, not evil enemies?

Why not start where we can arrest the bad guys without insurrectionists trying to blockade, and scream, and curse, and blow whistles, and fight us block by block?

Why not “practice until perfect,” and build a brand of success we can showcase to America, before fighting a door-to-door battle surrounded by radicals, that looks more like Fallujah than Minneapolis?

I also recommended renaming ICE to “N.I.C.E.” to change our image…using water cannons, red dye, and skunk smell against mobs of agitators…arresting thousands of vile, violent insurrectionists just like the J6 protesters were treated…and sending those arrested to detention centers 3000 miles away from home. Make their lives miserable and difficult.

If all of this works, the radical communist resistance will get the message- and protests will die down. Quickly.

I’ve also recommended cutting off welfare of all kinds to illegal aliens…taxing “remittances” at the rate of 100% to stop illegals from sending money out of the USA…and cutting off all federal funding to Sanctuary cities. Starve them all.

These are all “no-brainers.”

Then there’s eVerify. Enforce it and take away the jobs for illegals by fining and arresting business owners. If they have no jobs or welfare, illegal aliens will self deport by the tens of millions, at a record-setting pace. But it wont work until we put the fear of God into business owners.

This is how we choke off every possible income stream for illegal aliens.

This is the real “Operation Chokepoint”- even though Obama used the name to try to bankrupt legal gun stores, gold dealers, online gaming companies and crypto investors.

Then yesterday, I unveiled a new creative idea- herding protestors and agitators into official designated “protest zones,” so they have no contact with ICE agents doing their jobs. These safe zones would be enforced by National Guard troops. From now on, we must always always pair ICE with National Guard troops (to protect their flank).

Never again can we let agitators blockade, impede, intimidate or surround ICE officers during active ICE operations.

Perhaps most important of all, this Trump DOJ needs to indict and arrest the Democrat politicians at the top of the food chain- who are aiding and abetting illegal alien criminals; giving them advance notice of ICE raids; coordinating and organizing with rioters; and openly pushing for insurrection.

This crisis will not end until the politicians at the top are indicted, arrested, put on trial and convicted.

How do we prove that these politicians are in bed with the enemy? Send legions of IRS agents into each city to conduct forensic audits of every politician (and judge) who is on the side of the illegal alien invasion; aiding and abetting these criminals; and openly fighting ICE, and supporting open borders.

IRS agents will study every deposit made and every bill paid- to prove the radical insurrectionist politicians and resistance judges are all on the payroll of Mexico, China, the CCP and Drug Cartels.

Okay, now to my big idea- here is how we win the PR war….

With our own emotional PR offensive- featuring the families of the victims.

Democrats are better at the PR wars- because they have Hollywood and Madison Ave on their side. They understand the value of emotional stories, pulling on heartstrings.

So, they have successfully used two agitators being killed by ICE to win over middle America. Their message is “Oh my God, Trump’s stormtroopers are killing us.”

We need to fight fire with fire.

The Trump administration needs to buy hundreds of millions of dollars of TV ads, from now through the midterm elections, featuring the loved ones of victims of illegal alien murders, rapes and assaults. And also featuring parents of kids who died from drug overdoses too.

But not just any victims. We must match the victims with the exact illegal alien criminal arrested this week in each city.

If ICE arrests an illegal alien felon for murder today in Minneapolis…have a TV ad on the air within 48 hours featuring the victim’s mom and dad, or spouse, or children- thanking President Trump, thanking ICE, crying, telling their emotional story…

“We will never see our daughter again. Thank you President Trump and ICE for arresting and deporting this monster who ruined our family’s life.”

Two can play at this game.

For every Renee Good and Alex Pretti, there are thousands of mothers, and wives, and children who will never see their loved one again- because some illegal alien piece of garbage snuffed out their life…or trafficked in the fentanyl that killed them.

Let’s flood the TV airwaves with their emotional stories 24/7.

This is how we turn the tide, flip the script, and win the PR battle just in time for the midterms!

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Wayne Allyn Root is a CEO, businessman, best-selling author, and national conservative TV and radio host, who has interviewed President Trump 16 times. Watch Wayne’s TV show “America’s Top Ten Countdown” on Real America’s Voice TV Saturdays at Noon ET and his video podcast “WAR Zone presented by The Gateway Pundit” daily from 6 PM to 8 PM ET at TheGatewayPundit.com. His website is ROOTforAmerica.com. Read Wayne’s latest fun book, “How Democrats Have Made America Great.” It’s 140 blank pages. The joke is on Democrats!

The post WAYNE ROOT: Winning the Midterms is All About PR. PR is Everything. So Where are the Families of Illegal Alien Murder, Rape & Assault Victims? Where are the Parents of Children Killed by Drugs? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Transgender Antifa Activist Who Threatened Rep. Nancy Mace Charged With Attempted Murder in Oregon

Woman in a white top speaking at a congressional hearing, with attendees in the background engaged in discussions and note-taking.

Woman in a white top speaking at a congressional hearing, with attendees in the background engaged in discussions and note-taking.

Last May, a trans activist and Antifa member made a death threat against Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina.

He is now behind bars in Oregon, having been charged with the attempted murder of another man. It just goes to show a lot of these people are completely off balance and will repeatedly cause trouble until they are stopped.

NewsBusters reports:

Antifa Transgender Who Threatened Rep. Mace in 2025 Charged with Shooting, Attempted Murder of Oregon Man

A biologically-male transgender member of the domestic terrorist group Antifa – who was not prosecuted when he posted an implicit death threat against South Carolina Republican Rep. Nancy Mace last May – is now in a women’s prison in Oregon and facing charges of attempted murder.

“This blood is on the hands of every prosecutor who looked at this threat and looked away. I pray for the safety of the women he’s housed with,” Rep. Mace said in a statement Wednesday, reacting to the news and recounting the death threat made against her by “a transgender named ‘Rem Heathen’ whose real name is Michael Richard Fadich, the Antifa violent extremist”:

“In May 2025, Fadich posted a graphic on Instagram depicting a gun pointed directly at Rep. Mace’s face. The message was unmistakable: he wanted her dead.

“The Office of Rep. Mace reported this threat. Prosecutors did nothing. Now, eight months later, he is charged with attempted murder after allegedly shooting someone in Portland just last month. A man is in the hospital because the system failed to stop a violent extremist when it had the chance.”

Nancy Mace’s office put out this statement:

REP. NANCY MACE ASKS DOJ TO INVESTIGATE AFTER PROSECUTORS IGNORED DEATH THREAT, SUSPECT NOW CHARGED WITH ATTEMPTED MURDER

Congresswoman Nancy Mace (SC-01) is asking the Department of Justice to investigate why federal prosecutors failed to act after a violent extremist posted a death threat against her in May 2025, eight months before he was arrested and charged with attempted murder in Oregon.

In May 2025, Michael Richard Fadich posted an image on Instagram showing a gun pointed at Rep. Mace’s face. Her office immediately reported the threat to law enforcement. Prosecutors declined to press charges.

On December 21, 2025, Fadich allegedly shot a man in Portland, Oregon. The victim survived with serious injuries. Fadich was arrested January 8, 2026, in California and now faces attempted murder charges.

“A man is in the hospital because the system failed to stop a violent extremist when it had the chance,” Rep. Mace said. “When prosecutors ignore death threats, they don’t just fail one victim, they create more.”

Rep. Mace receives more than 1,300 threats annually. She contrasted this case with Samuel Cain, who was prosecuted and denied bond three times after threatening to kill her.

People on the extremist left are way too comfortable threatening other people with violence when they don’t get their way.

The post Transgender Antifa Activist Who Threatened Rep. Nancy Mace Charged With Attempted Murder in Oregon appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Attorney and Expert in Self-Defense Offers OUTSTANDING Analysis Showing Why ICE Shooting of Alex Pretti Was Justified (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

If you really want to understand the ICE shooting of Alex Pretti and understand why it was justified, you really don’t need to do anything but watch the video below.

Andrew Branca is an attorney who is an expert in self-defense. You may have seen clips of him in the past as he has his own talk show and is often brought on to other shows to provide legal analysis.

In this video, he carefully breaks down the Pretti shooting and puts it into language and perspective that anyone can uderstand.

Partial transcript by Collin Rugg on Twitter/X:

– “The moment he makes contact with that officer, he’s just committed a federal felony good for eight years in a federal penitentiary.”

– “That’s why they were seeking to make his arrest because they saw him commit a forcible felony against a fellow officer.”

– “Then he’s noncompliant with arrest. He’s fighting them. Then they discover he has a gun…”

– “They take that gun. There are cries of ‘gun, gun, gun.’ The officers called to each other. He’s still noncompliant. They hear a gunshot go off. And Alex Pretty’s right hand comes from his waistline with a black object in his hand.”

– “That combination of facts is going to get you shot 999 times out of a thousand by law enforcement, and justifiably so.”

“They’re making all these perceptions, all these decisions in a violent, chaotic melee caused by Alex Pretti.”

“They have to make all these decisions in a split second because that’s how quickly someone can use a weapon against you, and those decisions.”

“They don’t have to be correct. The law of self-defense does not require us to make perfect decisions…”

Watch the whole thing below, this is really outstanding:

People on the left will deny all of this because they need Alex Pretti to be a martyr, but as Andrew Branca clearly lays out in that video, the shooting was justified. The whole situation was caused by Pretti himself.

Pretti started it and then immediately made things worse for himself by resisting. The agents who were involved made split second decisions and were justified in doing so.

The post Attorney and Expert in Self-Defense Offers OUTSTANDING Analysis Showing Why ICE Shooting of Alex Pretti Was Justified (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Forgotten Casualties in Trump’s Wars

The Forgotten Casualties in Trump’s Wars

America’s foreign policy elites don’t seem to care much about the people they kill. 

CUBA-VENEZUELA-US-CONFLICT-CRISIS-FUNERAL

President Donald Trump views himself as a man of peace, so successful in settling wars that he should be the obvious winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. This after a year of promiscuous and foolish military interventions, splenetic and unpredictable tariff impositions, and bizarre and costly foreign demands, all presented as somehow making America great again. 

Of course, the administration’s fervent, even fevered, justifications are almost always implausible, and usually untrue. Consider Trump’s splendid little war in Venezuela, supposedly undertaken to save, by the president’s accounting, literally hundreds of thousands of American lives. Yet Caracas doesn’t produce fentanyl, send drug-filled boats to the U.S., or make Washington’s Dirty Dozen drug list. And when Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was seized, Trump celebrated how he’d plundered the oil—which he apparently intends to sell under his administration’s sole control. Drug interdiction evidently concerned him little more than democracy promotion, which mattered not at all, even after Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado gave him her Nobel medal.

In trying to justify the military operation, Attorney General Pam Bondi explained that it was necessary to arrest a defendant—notably, a foreigner not subject to U.S. jurisdiction—“to face justice.” However, a failed judicial extradition is no justification for a military invasion. The Constitution does not authorize the president to attack another nation for that reason. 

Moreover, war-making is always costly. In the case of Venezuela, scores of people apparently were killed. Not that anyone in Washington seemed to notice. Reported the New York Times

The Defense Department said it was conducting an assessment of the damage resulting from the attack. “We are currently not aware of any civilian casualties,” the Defense Department said in an email. “Every strike was precisely planned to achieve operational objectives and at no point were civilians intentionally targeted.”

No doubt, the Venezuelan government, still in the hands of Chavista apparatchiks, may be inflating numbers for propaganda purposes. However, the U.S. military’s unbridled lethality is an important reason why its missions are typically so successful. And the lack of effective resistance suggests that there likely were significant casualties.

The Times confirmed at least two civilian deaths after U.S. strikes that included an apartment building. It reported:

At 2 a.m. last Saturday, inside his sky blue apartment building in Catia La Mar, a city on Venezuela’s northern coast, Wilfredo González said he was jolted awake by the sound of whistles and explosions. He had just managed to stand when the shock wave from a blast knocked him back to the ground. “They are bombing us,” he recalled. After it was over, his relatives rushed to find survivors amid the debris in his unit. Mr. González, 61, said he found his 80-year-old aunt, Rosa Elena González, pinned under a washing machine. “She was saying, ‘I can’t breathe, I can’t breathe,’” Mr. González said, adding that she died shortly afterward at a hospital.

Moreover, scores of security personnel apparently died. According to the Times

Diosdado Cabello, Venezuela’s interior minister, said that 100 people had been killed, and at least as many wounded. The majority of those killed appear to have been members of the military. The Cuban government said 32 of those killed were Cuban citizens—members of the country’s armed forces or its interior ministry, on a mission in the country at Venezuela’s request. The Venezuelan government published obituaries for 23 service members who it said had been killed in the raid.

These were sons, brothers, and fathers. For instance, the Washington Post reported the story of 74-year-old Salvador Rodríguez, whose

son, the boy who’d always asked for Rodríguez’s blessings, who’d helped him through the anguish of his wife’s passing, had been taken from him, too—killed in an explosion during the mission by U.S. forces to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. “I have his cédula right here,” he said, pulling out the seared identification card of José Salvador Rodríguez, 32, who had served as a member of the Venezuelan military. “It was burned by the explosion.”

Why did Washington kill the younger Rodriguez and many others like him? The U.S. and Venezuela are not at war. The administration has gone out of its way to claim that the expedition was a law enforcement operation not a military clash. In the latter, soldiers can be slaughtered largely at will, and civilians are also often killed en masse. However, observed Charli Carpenter of the University of Massachusetts: “For law enforcement operations, the bar is much higher.” Claiming to launch an international invasion to arrest a defendant brings to mind the much-reviled federal government assault on the David Koresh compound in Waco and the Philadelphia Police Department’s bombing of a civilian neighborhood in an operation against the black radical MOVE organization. (President George H.W. Bush’s justification for invading Panama was very different, with drugs receiving only a minor mention.)

Nevertheless, many U.S. policymakers undoubtedly dismiss such deaths as unimportant, or, in the case of Venezuelan and Cuban military and security personnel, even another benefit for America. Of course, there would be little, if any, reason to mourn the passing of regime elites, those responsible for ongoing, brutal repression. However, Washington had no cause to kill even them, let alone common service members tasked with protecting their nations and leaders. Especially to effect Trump’s oil grab.

Promiscuously killing foreigners for national advantage will also prove politically counterproductive. While “so’s your mother” isn’t a good justification by other governments engaging in foreign aggression, wanton genocide, war crimes, and sundry oppression, it is an effective dismissal of U.S. moralizing. If the Donroe Doctrine is that Washington can wage war to ostentatiously grab resources from neighbors and turn them into puppet states, then the president will have nothing to say if Russia and China, as well as lesser powers—say Israel, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, or Iran in the Mideast—do the same in what they view as their spheres of interest. 

Not that Trump is the only, or even the worst, American offender in this regard. President George W. Bush is responsible for hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths resulting from his illegal and irresponsible invasion of Iraq. President Barack Obama underwrote a brutal, slow-motion regime change war in Libya, encouraging decades of intermittent conflict, and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates’ murderous campaign against Yemen, which continues to burn. President Joe Biden armed and financed Israel’s devastation of Gaza and its ruthless West Bank occupation, policies that Trump continued.

Such casualties are also likely to undermine the administration’s Venezuela policy. Few Latin American analysts believe that Trump’s decapitation strategy will lead to stable governance or U.S. control, let alone a humane, liberal democracy. Already, reported the Times, Venezuela’s

government officials have accused the United States of killing innocent civilians, and they honored the servicemen who died as martyrs in the struggle against the “cowardly” U.S. attack. “The imperialists know they have committed a terrible crime, that they have murdered civilians,” Mr. Cabello said, adding that the United States has “generated an anti-American sentiment” for having “murdered a group of Venezuelans who had nothing to do with this.”

Notably, Cabello remains in power, actively undermining Trump’s agenda, despite also having been indicted for drug crimes in the U.S. So much for the administration’s claims about fighting drugs. Moreover, Cabello and other regime apparatchiks are busy attacking Trump’s policies. Added the Times

On social media, the Venezuelan military released a deluge of cinematic videos from wakes and funerals. The footage showed wooden caskets draped in the tricolors of the national flag and blanketed in flowers, hoisted to the sounds of patriotic eulogies delivered by officers in full dress uniform. “The battle is not over, the homeland demands that we follow the example,” one officer declares in a video.

The world can be an ugly place, and Washington sometimes faces terrible choices. However, the U.S. president possesses neither the moral nor legal authority to wander the globe randomly imposing his will and killing anyone in the way. Someone claiming to be a peacemaker should stop irresponsibly visiting death and destruction upon other people. Even in Venezuela.

The post The Forgotten Casualties in Trump’s Wars appeared first on The American Conservative.

Regime Change Roll Call: Who’s Next?

Regime Change Roll Call: Who’s Next?

After Venezuela, the White House has Iran, Cuba, Haiti, and Iraq in its sights.

CUBA-VENEZUELA-US-CONFLICT-CRISIS-FUNERAL

Following the capture of President Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, Iran and Cuba seem to be the next possible countries on the list. And, whether they be regime changes, as is hoped for in Cuba, or decapitation operations, as was undertaken in Venezuela, there may be even more. 

Last week, Donald Trump said the U.S. has “an armada” heading toward Iran. “We have a lot of ships going that direction, just in case… I’d rather not see anything happen, but we’re watching them very closely.”

Watching closely for what? Trump has said he would order a second round of strikes if Iran restarted its civilian nuclear program. He has said he would order strikes if they continue with their ballistic missile program.

But, more ominously, on January 13, Trump told Iran’s protestors not only to “KEEP PROTESTING,” but to “TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!!” Four days later, he said it was “time to look for new leadership in Iran.”

And the looming strike on Iran may be more dramatic than the previous one. In requesting military options, “Trump has repeatedly used the word ‘decisive’” when defining his request. According to The Wall Street Journal, that has led to a menu of options being presented to Trump, “including some that would seek to push the regime out of power.”

On January 24, U.S. Central Command chief General Brad Cooper arrived in Israel, where he met with senior Israeli defense officials to coordinate in case the U.S. decides to strike Iran.

Meanwhile, the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln has changed course for the Middle East. Its strike group includes destroyers equipped with Tomahawk cruise missiles. It also brings air defenses against ballistic and cruise missiles. In the past weeks, a squadron of F-15s also deployed to the region, bringing the number to about 35. 

The U.S. has also progressed in its plans for Cuba. Trump has forecast that “Cuba is gonna be something we’ll end up talking about,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned that “if I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I’d be concerned at least, a little bit.”

According to reporting by The Wall Street Journal, the Trump administration has set a target of no later than the end of the year for regime change in Cuba. Lacking a “concrete plan,” they are seeking a Cuban government insider who can help execute the regime change. The Journal reports that “Trump believes that ending the Castro era would cement his legacy” and that it has “long been a stated goal for Secretary of State Marco Rubio.” Officials say that “Trump and his inner circle… see toppling Cuba’s Communist regime as the defining test of his national-security strategy to remake the hemisphere.”

With the U.S. “taking all” Venezuela’s oil, Trump declared that “THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA – ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.” 

But that’s not all. In 2025, Mexico provided Cuba with more oil than Venezuela did. Mexico is under intense pressure from Washington. Trump has warned that “Mexico has to get their act together, because [drugs are] pouring through Mexico, and we’re going to have to do something.” He has questioned Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum about oil shipments to Cuba. And, fearing American strikes on Mexican territory, her government is reportedly reviewing its policy of sending oil to Cuba. It is not clear what their decision will be.

An American chokehold on Cuban oil could go even further than Venezuela and Mexico. Members of the Trump administration, backed by Rubio, have advocated for “a total blockade on oil imports” to Cuba to collapse the economy and push out the government.

The U.S. also has a couple of elections and political appointments in its sights. While not regime change or even decapitation operations, these moves would influence regime choice.

In Haiti, after a majority of the Presidential Transition Council signed a resolution to replace the prime minister—a decision that the Organization of American States says “rest[s] with Haitian leadership”—the U.S. Embassy in Haiti posted that it considered that resolution “to be illegal.” The Embassy said “the corrupt politicians” who signed the resolution “support violent gangs and sow terror in the country” and vowed that the U.S. would “ensure they pay the ultimate price.” Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau added, “The U.S. would consider anyone supporting such a disruptive step favoring the gangs to be acting contrary to the interests of the United States, the region, and the Haitian people and will act accordingly.”

The U.S. will also act accordingly in Iraq, where they are using the same playbook as in Venezuela and Cuba. The recent parliamentary election in Iraq led to American threats that, if Iran-allied groups are included in the new government, the U.S. would block Iraq’s access to its own oil revenue.

The recent threats toward Iran and Cuba, the movement of military force into Iran’s region, and the meddling in Haiti and Iraq, suggest that Venezuela may not be the end of operations to topple or decapitate regimes during Trump’s second term. And next in line could be Iran and Cuba.

The post Regime Change Roll Call: Who’s Next? appeared first on The American Conservative.

Which Victims of the Police Can You Slander?

Which Victims of the Police Can You Slander?

Part one of two about how the left wants you to talk about enforcing the law.

Federal Agents Descend On Minneapolis For Immigration Enforcement Operations

When is it okay to “slander” the victim of a police shooting? It all depends on the politics of the victim.

Ever since Renee Good and Alex Pretti got themselves killed by interfering with federal law enforcement while in possession of deadly weapons, the media have been in a fit about the Trump administration’s plan to investigate the agitators’ ties to anti-ICE activist groups.

The federal government is facing a militarized, highly disciplined, violent left-wing operation that will do anything to prevent a single illegal alien from being deported. This includes road-blocking, screaming, blowing whistles, face-to-face confrontations, arson, vandalism, even assassination.

But for wanting to gather information on these two troublemakers, The Hill newspaper thundered at the administration: “The expectation is straightforward: you investigate the use of deadly force”—NOT the victims of the deadly force.

Hennepin County Prosecutor Mary Moriarty says the Trump administration’s interest in finding out more about Good and Pretti is “galling.” (Moriarty is such a left-wing lunatic that the other lunatics, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison, had to take a murder case away from her after she offered the perps a two-year sentence in a juvenile facility. This earned her a six-times-daily spot on MS-NOW.)

Obama administration veteran Juliette Kayyem claims that “Kill and Slander” is official government policy. “Kill and Slander,” she said, is the “terminology that is part of their M.O. right now.”

What liberals mean by “slander” is “to reveal unflattering facts about a person.”

Divulging anything vaguely negative about a victim whom liberals like is abhorrent, beyond the bounds of decency—even if the information is true, relevant and important. On the other hand, if liberals don’t like you, the worst thing you ever did in your life will be front-page news the day after the government kills you. The nastier and more irrelevant, the better.

DON’T LIKE: law enforcement officers, gun enthusiasts, and right-wing protesters.
LIKE: criminals and left-wing protesters.

This is part one, about the “Okay To Slander” chumps. There aren’t a lot of these to choose from because the people liberals don’t like rarely fight with the police.

On January 6, Ashli Babbitt was blown away by Capitol Hill Police Lt. Michael Byrd for trespassing. She was not attempting to run over a law enforcement officer, nor was she getting in the face of an officer while carrying a gun.

Immediately after her death, the media were fairly bristling with Babbitt’s flaky beliefs, tweets, arrests (no convictions)—even a confrontation with her husband’s ex-girlfriend, despite its sublime irrelevance to whether Byrd was justified in shooting her. The day after her death, he New York Times ran this headline/dek combo: “Woman Killed in Capitol Embraced Trump and QAnon; After 14 years in the military, Ashli Babbitt bought a pool supply company and delved into far-right politics.”

Meanwhile, we still don’t know anything about Good’s first husband or why she didn’t have custody of their two children, among other basic biographical information. It took 10 days for the media to tell us that Good wasn’t even married to the woman the media still call her “wife.”

No one said it was “tragic” that Babbitt was killed. They went straight to calling her a kook, this 14-year Air Force veteran. We certainly weren’t treated to a week of interviews with people who loved her. No photo-shopping to make her more attractive.

In other words, Babbitt’s death got the exact opposite treatment of Good and Petti’s, who were directly harassing federal officers trying to enforce federal law. Those two must be beatified—or you’re a Nazi.

Say, anybody remember Waco?

While not so recent as the murder of Emmett Till—no, I’m sorry, it’s 40 years more recent—in 1993, Bill Clinton’s ATF and FBI killed 82 Americans, including 22 children, at a Waco, Texas, compound of Branch Davidians, an offshoot of Seventh-day Adventists.

They did this for the sole purpose of serving a warrant on a single individual, David Koresh. Instead of just knocking on the door, the ATF decided to shoot, strafe and tear-gas a compound full of men, women, and children.

It was the U.S. government’s largest massacre of Americans in history.

Naturally, Democrats and the media leapt to defend the government’s pointless slaughter of Americans.

Guess how!

They smeared Koresh. The Democrats produced a member of Koresh’s religious sect, a 14-year-old girl, who testified that she’d been sexually abused by him.

And oh, how the media cheered. Under the headline, “In Waco Hearings, Parties Undergo a Role Reversal,” the Times cackled about how Democrats had switched the focus to Koresh—rather than the federal agents who killed him. Then-Rep. Charles E. Schumer, the Times reported, “received a congratulatory telephone call from President Clinton.” (Taking a moment away from jetting off on the Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein, no doubt.)

The Washington Post explained that “Koresh’s character—and the nature of his hold over his band of followers—is crucial to understanding what happened.”

Crucial! (His “hold” was based primarily on his mastery of the Bible, suggesting another category of Americans liberals think it’s okay to kill.)

In contrast to what’s happening in Minneapolis, the Branch Davidians were not an ongoing threat to the operation of the federal government, if they ever were. Their leader was dead and the compound a heap of smoldering ashes. To borrow from Hillary Clinton, what difference, at that point, did it make what kind of man Koresh was?

Maybe the molestation claim was true, and maybe it wasn’t. The moral of the story is, sliming Koresh was the left’s go-to move. You might call it “Kill and Slander.”

COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY IMPOLITE DEBATES

The post Which Victims of the Police Can You Slander? appeared first on The American Conservative.

Ilhan Omar Blames President Trump For Liquid ‘Attack’ in Unhinged Rant (VIDEO)

Political leader speaking at a press conference surrounded by microphones, advocating for immigration reform and community support, with supporters visible in the background.

Political leader speaking at a press conference surrounded by microphones, advocating for immigration reform and community support, with supporters visible in the background.

Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar on Wednesday evening blamed President Trump for the apple cider vinegar attack.

President Trump and others speculated that the so-called attack on Ilhan Omar was staged to distract from the probe into her mysterious jump in personal wealth.

A man, identified as 55-year-old Anthony Kazmierczak, charged at Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar during a town hall on Tuesday evening and sprayed her with apple cider vinegar.

“DHS Secretary Kristi Noem must resign or face impeachment,” Omar said on Tuesday evening to applause.

A few seconds later, Kazmierczak rushed up to the podium and sprayed Omar with the foul-smelling liquid.

“We will continue! This f*cking a**hole is not going to get away with it!” Ilhan Omar shouted.

Ilhan Omar held a candlelight vigil for Alex Pretti, the violent armed man who was fatally shot by DHS agents while he was resisting arrest.

Omar claimed President Trump is “intimidating” her and blamed him for the apple cider vinegar attack.

When asked about the apple cider vinegar attack on Omar, Trump suggested it was staged.

“No. I don’t think about her,” Trump told ABC News. “I think she’s a fraud. I really don’t think about that. She probably had herself sprayed, knowing her.”

The Muslima claimed she has to pay for security because Trump is “obsessed” with her.

“I wouldn’t be where I am at today, having to pay for security, having the government to think about providing me security if Donald Trump wasn’t in office and if he wasn’t so obsessed with me,” Omar said.

“It is ironic that just last night he was on stage moments before I was attacked talking about me, and then when asked about my attack, he said, ‘I don’t think about her,’” she added.

WATCH:

The post Ilhan Omar Blames President Trump For Liquid ‘Attack’ in Unhinged Rant (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Greg Gutfeld Goes Off on Jessica Tarlov for Virtue Signaling Over Illegals While Ignoring Women Victims (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

If you’ve been watching The Five lately, you know that Jessica Tarlov has been particularly annoying.

The liberal panelist on the show has used the events of recent weeks to push her negative views of ICE and to virtue signal over illegal aliens.

Greg Gutfeld has been trapped in California most of the week, due to the snow storms but he came back today and read the riot act to Jessica over her hypocisy.

He held up three pages and said, “Here’s three pages of women who have been murdered by illegal aliens in the last like, seven or eight years.”

He compared the situation to someone hovering over a maid and complaining about the way the maid is cleaning up a mess.

Finally, he said, “I’m back to correct the record that people need to hear! I don’t care about this performance any more, Jessica. It’s done. If you want to cry about murderers and rapists do it on your own time!”

Watch the whole thing below:

Hollywood in Toto notes that 2025 was a pretty good year for Gutfeld:

‘Gutfeld!’ Ruled 2025 While Two Late-Night Shows Collapsed

Greg Gutfeld’s program, which features a crush of comedians, talking heads and pundits, boosted its ratings lead by an impressive 21 percent from 2024.

No A-listers, no problem. The show’s reliance on rebel comedians like Dave Landau, Jamie Lissow and Jeff Dye fuels the show’s laugh quotient.

And while the early start time gives “Gutfeld!” a distinct advantage, the show airs on a cable channel, which reduces the number of potential viewers by a sizable margin.

Kimmel, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers all spread their liberal views via free broadcast airwaves.

The teary-eyed “Man Show” alum watched his show nearly bite the dust, and he had only himself to blame. Kimmel suggested that a MAGA supporter, not progressive activist Tyler Robinson, pulled the trigger that killed Charlie Kirk on Sept. 10.

That sent Kimmel to the bench after a sizable affiliate revolt. Since his return, his ratings have ticked upwards, partly due to the nonstop publicity as well as leaping past Colbert as late-night TV’s “Resistance” warrior.

The post Greg Gutfeld Goes Off on Jessica Tarlov for Virtue Signaling Over Illegals While Ignoring Women Victims (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

IT BEGINS: Zohran Mamdani Announces Plans to ‘Tax the Wealthy’ to Compensate for NYC Budget Deficit (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Well that was fast.

Zohran Mamdani has been mayor of New York City for less than a month and he is already talking about raising taxes on the ‘wealthy’ to make up the city’s budget deficit, which he claims is on par with the Great Recession.

Get ready to see a lot of Uhauls leaving the city.

CNBC reports:

New York Mayor Mamdani says city must hike taxes on wealthy to fill $12 billion deficit

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Wednesday said the city’s wealthiest must pay more in taxes to help fill the staggering budget deficit of more than $12 billion that he was left by his predecessor.

“This is at a scale that’s actually greater than what we saw here in New York City during the Great Recession,” Mamdani said of that budget hole during an interview with CNBC “Squawk Box” co-anchor Andrew Ross Sorkin at City Hall.

The Democrat, who took office on Jan. 1 after campaigning on a platform of hiking taxes on the rich, attributed the big deficit to “gross fiscal mismanagement.”

He pointed to actions taken by former Mayor Eric Adams, and by ex-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, whom he soundly defeated in the November general election, for causing that budget gap.

Mamdani vowed that his administration will be up front with New Yorkers about budget issues that have been “hidden from them for far too long.”

City Comptroller Mark Levine earlier this month said the new mayor faces a budget shortfall that is projected to total $12.6 billion over the next two fiscal years.

That comprises a $2.2 billion projected deficit on the city’s nearly $116 billion budget for fiscal 2026, which ends on June 30, and a $10.4 billion gap in fiscal 2027.

See the video below:

This is what the people of New York City voted for. They are about to find out what it means.

The post IT BEGINS: Zohran Mamdani Announces Plans to ‘Tax the Wealthy’ to Compensate for NYC Budget Deficit (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.