Cuba Didn’t FAFO: The Regime Folded WITHOUT Any Pressure

Image features Donald Trump smiling and pointing on the left, and Miguel Díaz-Canel seated at a table with a Cuban flag on the right.

Image features Donald Trump smiling and pointing on the left, and Miguel Díaz-Canel seated at a table with a Cuban flag on the right.

WATCH: Before the Pressure Even Started, Cuba Folded

On this episode of The Patriot Perspective, we focused on a major shift in the Western Hemisphere: Cuba’s decision to negotiate with the United States after President Donald Trump made clear that he was willing to escalate pressure on the regime.

The central point of the discussion was simple. Cuba did not move toward negotiations because conditions improved. 

Cuba moved because the regime understood that Trump was serious and because the country is already in an extremely weak position.

There may not have been direct military pressure on Havana at the moment, but the episode argued that a regime does not need American troops on its shores to feel cornered. 

It only needs to see that its economic lifelines are shrinking, its allies are weakening, and its own people are growing more frustrated.

The conversation began with Cuba’s internal condition. The country is already facing severe economic problems, including blackouts, energy shortages, food rationing, deteriorating infrastructure, and limited access to basic necessities. 

Those are not abstract economic indicators. Those are daily failures that affect whether people can keep the lights on, get hot water, or find enough food and medicine.

The episode made the case that those weaknesses have left the Cuban government with very little room for error. 

A regime that cannot provide stability at home becomes much more vulnerable when outside pressure increases.

That is where Venezuela entered the discussion. For years, Cuba relied heavily on Venezuela as a major partner, particularly for oil and broader economic support. 

That relationship helped keep Havana afloat even while the domestic economy continued to deteriorate.

Now, according to the argument laid out in the episode, Trump’s broader regional strategy has changed that equation. 

As Venezuela loses strength and as the United States gains more leverage over trade in the region, Cuba has lost one of its most important external supports.

That was one of the most important points in the episode. Cuba did not fold in isolation. Cuba folded after watching the regional environment shift against it.

The discussion also emphasized the deeper failure of the Cuban system itself. 

Cuba is geographically well-positioned, rich in tourism potential, close to the United States, and naturally capable of serving as a major Caribbean economic hub. Yet despite those advantages, the country remains trapped in chronic decline.

The argument presented was that this failure is the product of a corrupt and repressive government that controls resources through a state-connected elite while ordinary Cubans deal with scarcity and stagnation. 

When a country with that much potential remains in visible decline, the problem is not geography. The problem is governance.

The episode then widened into a broader strategic point. 

Trump’s interest in Cuba is not only about Cuba itself. It is about reasserting American strength in its own hemisphere and reducing the influence of hostile or destabilizing regimes close to U.S. territory.

Under that framework, Cuba becomes part of a larger effort to reshape the balance of power in the region and to prevent anti-American governments from maintaining a foothold near the United States.

The episode closed with a broader conclusion about deterrence. Trump’s rhetoric, the argument went, is effective because adversaries increasingly believe that he is willing to follow through. 

Cuba’s move toward negotiation was framed as proof that even a regime that has survived for decades can reconsider its position when it sees that the cost of resistance may keep rising.

As we concluded, Cuba folded not because the pressure was overwhelming in a single dramatic moment, but because the regime saw its weakness, its isolation, and realized that Trump was not bluffing.

The Patriot Perspective has recently switched its main platform from Rumble to YouTube, and we would greatly appreciate it if our old subscribers would subscribe to us there. [HERE]

The post Cuba Didn’t FAFO: The Regime Folded WITHOUT Any Pressure appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

‘TRIANGLES’: DOJ-Released Files Show Disgraced Former British Ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson, Getting Illegal Drugs and Botox From Jeffrey Epstein

Mandelson and Epstein living the life – Photo released by DOJ

The fallout from the ‘Epstein files’ was particularly hard on former Labour peer Peter Mandelson.

While British elite member ‘Petie’ felt he was powerful and untouchable over his Jeffrey Epstein ties, the reality proved much different.

Mandelson was fired from his US ambassadorship, had to resign from the Labour Party and the House of Lords, his consulting firm collapsed, and to top it all, he was arrested over his Epstein ties, as he is criminally investigated for ‘Misconduct in Public Office’.

And, as bad as things already are, the revelations keep popping up from the documents released by the US DOJ.

A man in a gray shirt and white underwear stands next to a woman in a robe, both engaged in conversation in a hotel room.
Mandelson pictured in his underwear in Epsteins NY townhouse – photo released by US DOJ

Now, a report, appearing first on the Daily Mail, shows how late pedophile Epstein allegedly supplied illegal drugs and Botox to Mandelson.

Metro reported:

“Messages show the two men discussing the use of anti-anxiety pill Xanax, with Mandelson relying on his disgraced friend for medical advice, according to the Mail on Sunday.

In the UK, Xanax is a Class C controlled substance, making it illegal to buy or supply. It is also controlled in the US due to the risk of addiction.”

The DOJ released emails where Mandelson and Epstein discuss ‘triangles’ – a nickname for Xanax due to their shape – while he was a UK cabinet minister.

“One exchange shows Epstein asking Mandelson: ‘feeling bettter [sic]?’ Mandelson, who was then serving in government as the UK’s business secretary, responds by asking: ‘How will I get more triangles ?!’”

Mandelson and his ‘best pal’ Epstein shopping in the US Virgin Islands – Image released by US DOJ

The late Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre spoke about the use of Xanax by Epstein.

In other email, Epstein and Mandelson discuss organizing Botox injections for Mandelson ahead of his official trip to New York.

“The sex offender suggests ‘face and neck’ on a Wednesday, before Mandelson provides times when he is free and asks: ‘Do you think I should ??’ Epstein replies: ‘botox first step.’”

Read more:

British Government Releases Documents on the Appointment of Disgraced Peter Mandelson as US Ambassador – PM Starmer Was Warned That the Epstein Friend Posed a ‘Reputational Risk’

The post ‘TRIANGLES’: DOJ-Released Files Show Disgraced Former British Ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson, Getting Illegal Drugs and Botox From Jeffrey Epstein appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Announces That the FCC, Under Brendan Carr, Will Review Licenses of Corrupt Networks for ‘Fake News’ in Coverage of the War with Iran

Person holding a smartphone displaying a news article labeled "FAKE," with a laptop and earbuds in the background, emphasizing the importance of media literacy.

Person holding a smartphone displaying a news article labeled "FAKE," with a laptop and earbuds in the background, emphasizing the importance of media literacy.

This is a Gateway Hispanic article.

The post Trump Announces That the FCC, Under Brendan Carr, Will Review Licenses of Corrupt Networks for ‘Fake News’ in Coverage of the War with Iran appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Arizona Maniac Who Crucified Beloved Pastor Begs for Death Penalty — ‘The Victims Want It. The Victim’s Families Want It. I Want It, and the Taxpayers Want It.’

Man with facial tattoos speaking in a casual setting, wearing a blue shirt, with a neutral background.

Man with facial tattoos speaking in a casual setting, wearing a blue shirt, with a neutral background.

Adam Sheafe, the 51-year-old Arizona man who confessed to the brutal crucifixion-style murder of 76-year-old Pastor William Schonemann, is now begging the court to give him the death penalty.

Sheafe, obsessed with the Old Testament and sporting a Hebrew tattoo meaning “God” on his neck, admitted to nailing the pastor’s hands to the wall, placing a crown of thorns on his head, and mutilating his body in what he called “Operation First Commandment” a deranged plot to target over a dozen Christian leaders across the country for allegedly leading followers astray.

The gruesome crime took place in April 2025 at Schonemann’s home in New River, where the elderly pastor of New River Bible Chapel was found dead in his bed, arms outstretched in a mock crucifixion, covered in blood.

Authorities say Sheafe broke into the home after stealing a truck from nearby Cave Creek, carried out the killing, and later confessed fully to the FBI and multiple media outlets even before his indictment.

WATCH:

Prosecutors charged him with first-degree murder, burglary, kidnapping, theft, and attempted murder counts related to his hit list.

Representing himself in Maricopa County Superior Court last week, Sheafe tried to plead guilty on the spot, railing against delays in the legal system.

“From day one, I’ve said I did this. These are the reasons why I did this, and I’m not contesting anything,” he told the judge. “What about the victim’s families? What about me? What about my family? We want closure so we can move on with our lives.”

Sheafe highlighted the crime’s heinous nature, committed intentionally against a victim over 70, as aggravating factors warranting capital punishment.

“Put me on death row, set the execution date for right now. The victims want it. The victim’s families want it. I want it, and the taxpayers want it,” Sheafe declared.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office is seeking the death penalty.

The post Arizona Maniac Who Crucified Beloved Pastor Begs for Death Penalty — ‘The Victims Want It. The Victim’s Families Want It. I Want It, and the Taxpayers Want It.’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Democrats Continue To Keep DHS Held Hostage, Reinforcing The Need To Eliminate Filibuster

United States Capitol building showcasing its iconic dome and architectural details under a cloudy sky.

United States Capitol building showcasing its iconic dome and architectural details under a cloudy sky.

It has been officially a month since Democrats forced the Department of Homeland Security into an indefinite shutdown, which began on Valentine’s Day, following a firestorm of Left-Wing media attacks targeting the agency over the conduct of several ICE agents carrying out a deportation raid.

Mass deportations, which was a central pillar of all three of President Trump’s campaign promises, was among the top issues on which the President ran in 2024, following the greatest border invasion in American history.

And though legacy media outfits might have you thinking the opposite, the policy of mass deportations remains widely popular and, indeed, commands bipartisan support.

Realizing that the policy has mass public support, the Democrats pivoted their approach to exploiting some bad optics surrounding the Alex Pretti incident and have used that as a weapon to hold Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration for ransom to their demands.

These demands serve effectively as a rash of policies (body camera requirements; deescalation training programs; requirements for judicial warrants) that would all but neuter Immigration and Customs Enforcement from practically being able to implement their mandate.

For their part, Republicans quite rightly have said that acquiescence to Democratic demands would be suicidal, both politically and for the country.

As a result, Democrats have countered with the offer that instead of funding the agency outright, they would opt to finance DHS piecemeal, with special appropriations packages tailored to non-immigration subagencies that fall under DHS’ purview, such as FEMA and TSA – the two agencies central to disaster management and transportation security, respectively.

Both Republicans and the White House have correctly pointed to the absurdity of this “compromise solution.”

First, there should be no need to reach a piecemeal funding package in the first place: the administration’s immigration policies (including the ones labeled “hardline” and spearheaded by Stephen Miller) are overwhelmingly backed by the public and are essential to maintaining the national security of the country, particularly at a time when overseas conflicts have heightened the risks – including dangers from international terrorism – at home.

Second, no other agency is funded in piecemeal.  Since its inception, the Department of Homeland Security has included over twenty-five subagencies, each of which operate in collaboration with one another, the intelligence agencies, and Justice Department, to protect the homeland from foreign and domestic perils.

By selectively choosing one subagency to fund, because of a perception that the relevant agency, like FEMA, is less of a political lightning rod than ICE, for example, is grievously unwise.

Like a body, each subagency under Homeland Security functions as if it were a vital organ which can only operate at full capacity if the other subagencies also work at full capacity.  Short of that, the whole apparatus breaks down.

One would never propose, for instance, funding only one branch of the military at the Department of War; or keeping Main Justice at DOJ open while starving the US Attorneys’ offices and Bureau of Prisons of mission critical resources.

That would be absurd.  The component parts would not be able to function properly without the entire agency operating at full capacity.  The example serves to underscore just how ridiculous is the Democrats’ plan to keep TSA functioning, while ICE and CBP suffer.

The “piecemeal plan” by the Democrats also reinforces the sinister ways by which they operate.  Under the Biden regime, Homeland Security, led by Alejandro Mayorkas, was essentially defunded.

Mission critical duties, like the operations border patrol agents are tasked to manage, were made obsolete by an administration that outwardly despised the agency’s mandate to keep American citizens safe, while expelling unlawful, and in many cases, criminal aliens from the country.

Democrats believed that simply making a distinction between citizen and non-citizen was not just unlawful but immoral, somehow incompatible with American values.

That was how we ended up with over 20 million illegal aliens infiltrating the nation’s borders between 2021 and 2025, until Trump reclaimed the Oval Office and ended all illegal border crossings, a feat that persists to this day.

Even though they are no longer in power, Democratic leaders disagree just as much with the policy of border security despite losing a landslide race fewer than two years ago, driven primarily by this key issue.

But lacking the official capacity to make their dismay known with scandalously reckless policies such as open borders, Democrats have instead opted for more subtle tactics, like the piecemeal strategy mentioned above to reopen DHS.

Their goal is not simply to negotiate with their Republican counterparts in a fair and reasonable manner, but to opportunistically exploit a bad headline or two surrounding this all-important agency to keep DHS inoperative until they return to power.

At which point, Democrats, should they ever reclaim the Presidency, and, God forbid, one or both houses of Congress, would immediately propose legislation to permanently shutter all border enforcement federal agencies (and perhaps DHS entirely) for good.

This underscores the stakes: if Republicans capitulate now and, say, accede to demands to sever ICE funding from the rest of the DHS appropriations package, Democrats will in the future have even more political firepower to not only argue in favor of eliminating ICE and CBP, but could also justify their demands on the basis that those subagencies remained closed under a Republican presidency, and everything went well!

Meanwhile, as the weeks roll on, and as all this drama unfolds on Capitol Hill, TSA agents continue to miss paycheck after paycheck.  Some have simply stopped showing up to work, while others have submitted formal resignations.

This has prompted sometimes hours-long wait times at some of the nation’s most populated airports.  Overbooked and delayed flights cause massive backlogs, triggering shockwaves across mass transit systems nationwide.

The repercussions of these decisions affect the day-to-day lives of ordinary Americans: families of government workers go weeks, maybe months, without reliable pay; Americans traveling for business or recreation are forced to spend more time in airports and potentially be inconvenienced by significant delays that disrupt important critical engagements.

These negative externalities could pressure Democrats to relent to Republican demands.  They could also crystallize the heightened political stakes that Republicans face, too.

With these disruptions, the coming midterms, the ongoing war in Iran, and the prospect of election integrity legislation in the Save America Act languishing on the docket, the mounting list of concerns should force Republican leadership to reconsider the filibuster.

The DHS fiasco is yet another reason, not that one was needed, to eliminate or at least modify the filibuster (and, for instance, return to the traditional filibuster that actually requires the one who invokes it to stand up and talk for hours) so that a simple majority can vote on these critical bills to advance the President’s agenda without deepening reputational injury to the administration.

The post Democrats Continue To Keep DHS Held Hostage, Reinforcing The Need To Eliminate Filibuster appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

CNN Host PRESSES Pete Buttigieg: Why Did the Biden Administration Do NOTHING to Stop Iran? (VIDEO)

Image featuring Secretary Pete Buttigieg and former President Donald Trump during a discussion on political topics, highlighting contrasting viewpoints and leadership styles.

Image featuring Secretary Pete Buttigieg and former President Donald Trump during a discussion on political topics, highlighting contrasting viewpoints and leadership styles.

WATCH: CNN Host Asks: Why Did the Biden Administration Do Nothing to Stop Iran?

Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg found himself in an uncomfortable position during a recent CNN interview when the host bluntly asked about a reality many Democrats have tried to ignore: the Biden administration did absolutely nothing to stop Iran’s nuclear and missile programs.

The exchange came during a discussion about the escalating conflict with Iran and the military actions ordered by President Donald Trump.

During the interview, the host directly challenged Buttigieg with a simple question.

The Trump administration argues that the strike on Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile infrastructure was necessary because the previous administration spent four years allowing Iran to expand its weapons programs and fund terrorism across the globe.

“Are they wrong?” the host asked.

That question highlights a fundamental problem for Democrats attempting to criticize Trump’s actions.

The record speaks for itself.

Over the past several years, Iran dramatically expanded uranium enrichment levels, increased ballistic missile testing, and continued funding terrorist proxy groups across the Middle East, including organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

At the same time, the United States repeatedly watched from the sidelines.

Instead of applying maximum pressure, the Biden administration pursued diplomatic strategies that only emboldened Tehran rather than stopping it. 

Former President Biden was even considering bringing back the JCPOA, which President Obama first initiated, known as the Iran nuclear deal. The agreement was notorious for its lack of credibility: it gave Iran roughly $180 billion in unfrozen assets while doing little to prevent Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Now, as President Trump takes decisive military action against Iranian capabilities, many Democrats are attempting to portray the conflict as reckless or unnecessary.

Buttigieg followed that script during the interview, accusing Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth of poor leadership and claiming the war was launched without proper planning.

He also argued that Americans are now paying the economic price for the conflict through higher gas prices and economic uncertainty.

However, that argument conveniently ignores the policies that helped create the current situation.

Iran’s nuclear program did not accelerate overnight. The regime spent years expanding uranium enrichment and developing missile technology while funding terrorist groups across the region.

Some argue that those developments occurred precisely because Iran believed the United States lacked the willingness to confront it directly.

The Trump administration’s position is straightforward: allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons and long-range missile capabilities would pose an existential threat not only to Israel but also to American allies and global stability.

That is why the administration chose to act.

Supporters of the operation point out that failing to respond would have allowed Tehran to continue moving closer to a nuclear weapons capability while strengthening its network of proxy militias throughout the Middle East.

The debate also exposed another contradiction in Democrat messaging.

For years, many of the same political figures criticizing Trump’s use of force supported prolonged military interventions during earlier conflicts in the Middle East.

Now those same voices are suddenly portraying limited strikes against Iran’s military infrastructure as reckless escalation.

The reality is far simpler.

Iran’s regime has spent decades sponsoring terrorism, developing ballistic missiles, and pursuing nuclear capabilities that threaten global security. Ignoring those threats does not make them disappear.

The Trump administration’s approach reflects the belief that deterrence requires strength.

If the previous administration had taken meaningful steps to stop Iran’s nuclear and missile programs, the situation facing the United States today might look very different.

The Patriot Perspective has recently switched its main platform from Rumble to YouTube, and we would greatly appreciate it if our old subscribers would subscribe to us there. [HERE]

The post CNN Host PRESSES Pete Buttigieg: Why Did the Biden Administration Do NOTHING to Stop Iran? (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Economist Who Predicted 2008 and 2020 Crashes: “Prepare for AI Meltdown”

A computer screen displays a digital brain and robotic hands analyzing stock market trends, with a professional speaker in an inset circle.

Note: The information provided here or in any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice. Gateway Pundit benefits from purchases made through our sponsors.

A computer screen displays a digital brain and robotic hands analyzing stock market trends, with a professional speaker in an inset circle.

Whenever this man issues a stock market warning…

You should stop and listen because…

He’s the famous economist and best-selling author who predicted the two biggest stock market crashes of the last two decades.

He predicted the 2008 meltdown…

Just three weeks before Lehman Brothers imploded and the stock market collapsed…

And he predicted the COVID meltdown…

Again just three weeks before the stock market suffered the fastest drop in history.

He’s now predicting we’re about to see an AI meltdown of historic proportions…

Similar to what happened in 2000 during the dotcom bust…

When the stock market crashed almost 80%…

Ruining the retirement of millions of Americans.

In short, he believes the most important AI company in the world is about to go bust…

In a meltdown that will be 10 times bigger than Lehman Brothers…

….sending a ripple effect through the market that could crater the entire AI industry.

And he’s warning everyone to take these five simple steps to prepare.

The post Economist Who Predicted 2008 and 2020 Crashes: “Prepare for AI Meltdown” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Social Security Is a Disaster – Is the Solution Australia’s Superannuation Program?

Historical photo of a group of officials surrounding a seated man signing a document, symbolizing a significant legislative action.

Historical photo of a group of officials surrounding a seated man signing a document, symbolizing a significant legislative action.

The insolvency of Social Security has been discussed for years. Is the solution Australia’s Superannuation program? The nightmare arrives. In 2014, in the book Falling Eagle – Rising Tigers, the massive … Read more

The post Social Security Is a Disaster – Is the Solution Australia’s Superannuation Program? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Megyn Kelly Responds After Getting SLAMMED by President Trump For Her Disgusting Comment on Mark Levin and It Quickly Backfires

Screencap from YouTube video.

Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly is not letting getting nuked by President Trump stop her from dialing up her feud with legendary radio host Mark Levin, though this does not appear to be a popular decision.

As The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson reported, Levin has had a months-long public feud with other conservative podcasters, including Megyn Kelly, Jack Posobiec, Steve Bannon, and Tucker Carlson.

The barb trading with Kelly came to a head on Sunday, when Kelly called Levin “Microp*nis Mark” and suggested that she easily triggers him because of “his microp*nis.”

“Microp*nis Mark @marklevinshow thinks he has the monopoly on lewd. He tweets about me obsessively in the crudest, nastiest terms possible. Literally more than some stalkers I’ve had arrested. He doesn’t like it when women like me fight back. Bc of his microp*nis,” Kelly wrote on X.

Trump responded by taking Levin’s side with a fiery post on Truth Social, blasting Kelly and others for attacking him. He warned that she and others would fall by the wayside for attacking him, while also implying that she and her friends, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, were not MAGA.

“Those that speak ill of Mark will quickly fall by the wayside, as do the people whose ideas, policies, and footings are not sound,” Trump wrote.

“THEY ARE NOT MAGA, I AM, and MAGA includes not allowing Iran, a Sick, Demented, and Violent Terrorist Regime, to have a Nuclear Weapon to blow up the United States of America, the Middle East, and, ultimately, the rest of the World,” he added. “MAGA is about stopping them cold, and that is exactly what we are doing. GOD BLESS OUR GREAT MILITARY, WHICH I HAVE REBUILT SINCE THE BEGINNING OF MY FIRST TERM, TO ACHIEVE EVERLASTING PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

After learning of Trump’s post, Kelly not only doubled down on her vile comment but also taunted Levin for “crying to Daddy.”

She also claimed Levin had made several misogynistic attacks against her.

“Micro p*nis @marklevinshow is such a SMALL MAN he had to go beg the president for a pat on the head (in the middle of a war!) to make himself feel better about … well, you know,” she wrote.

“This, after one mean tweet about him – following his 111 (!) nasty, non-stop, personal, misogynistic attacks on me. (Fox has an OBSESSED HARASSER on its hands.).”

“Just like all feckless, weakling bullies, Micro can dish it out, but he can’t take it. After just one post putting the so-called “great one” in his place, he ran crying to Daddy.”

The tweet quickly backfired with users ripping Kelly for her classless tirade. Users also note that she previously praised Levin, saying she had a “huge crush” on him.

The post Megyn Kelly Responds After Getting SLAMMED by President Trump For Her Disgusting Comment on Mark Levin and It Quickly Backfires appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

BEAUTIFUL: Irish Actress Jessie Buckley Surprises Woke Hollywood — Defies Anti-Family Agenda with Heartfelt Tribute to Motherhood During Oscar Win

Actress delivering an emotional acceptance speech while wearing a red off-the-shoulder gown and diamond jewelry at an award ceremony.

Actress delivering an emotional acceptance speech while wearing a red off-the-shoulder gown and diamond jewelry at an award ceremony.
Irish actress Jessie Buckley delivers an emotional acceptance speech at the Oscars, dedicating her award to “the beautiful chaos of a mother’s heart” while celebrating the transformative power of motherhood.

In a rare and refreshing moment that cut through the usual Hollywood talking points, Irish actress Jessie Buckley delivered a heartfelt tribute to motherhood during her Oscar acceptance speech, openly celebrating family, love, and the transformative power of becoming a parent.

At a time when the entertainment industry often appears hostile to traditional family values and frequently promotes narratives that downplay or dismiss motherhood or call mothers “birthing persons” to appease the transgender community, Buckley used one of Hollywood’s biggest stages to honor the very role many in the cultural elite tend to ignore.

Holding her Oscar for her role in “Hamnet” and visibly emotional, Buckley reflected on how motherhood reshaped her life and perspective.

Rather than treating motherhood as something to apologize for, or something secondary to her career, Buckley elevated it as the defining experience of her life.

Transcript below:

“This is—this is really something.

Thank you to the incredible women that I stand beside. I am inspired by your art and your heart, and I want to work with every single one of you.

To the producers who created this ship for us to stand in, and my shipmates for life—Hilda, Jessica, Lindy, Zach—none of this is possible without you.

My family—my Irish family—they’re all here. Ireland bought them flights. Where are you?

Mom, Dad, thank you for teaching us to dream and to never be defined by expectation, but to carve from your own passion.

You, Fred—I love you, man. I love you. You’re the most incredible dad. You’re my best friend, and I want to have 20,000 more babies with you. I do. I do.

And Isla—my little girl, who is eight months old—who has absolutely no idea what’s going on and is probably dreaming of milk. But this… it’s kind of a big deal. And I love you, and I love being your mom, and I can’t wait to discover life beside you.

Chloe and Maggie—to get to know this incandescent woman and journey to understand the capacity of a mother’s love is the greatest collision of my life.

It’s Mother’s Day in the UK today, so I would like to dedicate this to the beautiful chaos of a mother’s heart.

We all come from a lineage of women who continue to create against all odds. Thank you for recognizing me in this role. This is the greatest honor. I can’t even believe it.

Go raibh míle maith agaibh.”

WATCH:

Jessie Buckley and her husband, Freddie, welcomed their first child, a daughter, in 2025. The actress, who married her husband in 2023, revealed her pregnancy in April 2025 at CinemaCon and later confirmed the birth in October 2025 during a podcast appearance.

More from AOL:

The couple welcomed their first child together, a daughter, in 2025. Buckley first revealed her pregnancy in April 2025 when she made an appearance at CinemaCon in an all-black ensemble that put her baby bump on display.

[…]

“It’s intense, but I just love it,” she said of motherhood. “I really can see her little personality start to come through. I see this life force in her and determination, and I hope she loves life as much as I do.”

The next month, Buckley revealed her favorite thing about parenting.

“The best thing about being a mom is just when even when you’re having a hard day, they give you these otherworldly little smiles and make your heart crack into a thousand pieces, and you think, ‘Oh, it’s all going to be okay,’ ” she told Elle.

Buckley filmed Hamnet — where she portrays Agnes Shakespeare, a mother of three — before she welcomed her daughter. But even then, she had a deep desire for motherhood.

“I wasn’t a mother at the time that I filmed it. I deeply wanted to be a mother, but I have a mother and I know women and we’re pretty epic,” the actress told press at the 2026 Critics Choice Awards. “We’ve got a lot. We contain multitudes. We’ve got a lot inside of us.”

The post BEAUTIFUL: Irish Actress Jessie Buckley Surprises Woke Hollywood — Defies Anti-Family Agenda with Heartfelt Tribute to Motherhood During Oscar Win appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.