The post AbleChild Review of Netflix’s “Nuremberg”: How Psychiatry Participated & Rewrites Atrocity appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
The post Iran’s Islamic Terrorist Regime in Full Meltdown as Its Days Are Coming to an End appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Just one week after its explosive launch on March 5, 2026, former Army Captain Seth Keshel’s hard-hitting exposé, The American War on Election Corruption: The Crusade to Restore Trust in Voting, has skyrocketed to the top of Amazon’s charts. With a foreword by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, this must-read book delves into the systemic fraud plaguing America’s elections, from historical manipulations like Boss Tweed’s era to the shocking anomalies of 2020 and lessons from 2024.
Keshel, a military intelligence veteran and election integrity expert commended by President Donald J. Trump for uncovering voting irregularities, announced on X that despite Amazon server glitches on launch day, the book “launched big.” And the numbers prove it: The book alone (available in paperback, hardcover, audio, and e-book) has claimed #1 spots in Elections, Elections and Political Process, and 21st Century World History categories, making it a triple-threat bestseller.
The success doesn’t stop at rankings. Readers are raving, giving it an impressive 4.8 out of 5 stars so far. As Keshel’s Substack, Captain K’s Corner (CaptainK.US), continues to be a bestseller in its own right, this book is arming patriots with the facts and strategies needed to fight back against election corruption. One reviewer wrote, “’Election fraud is the norm, as are all efforts by men in power to stay in power.’ That quote from Seth Keshel’s book captures the essence of this topic. Election fraud is by far the largest issue facing all Americans. When people cheat to get into office, they don’t suddenly have citizens’ best interests in mind; they’re in it for the power, and often, financial gain.”
Keshel’s work has caught the ear of many major broadcasters and podcasts, and as interest in the SAVE Act increases, it is likely more Americans will be drawn to the book. Newt Gingrich, in his recent episode of Newt’s World with Captain Keshel, suggested he would inform President Trump that every member of Congress needed a copy of The American War on Election Corruption, which can be ordered here: https://www.amazon.com/
Congratulations, Captain Seth Keshel!
The post UPDATE: Seth Keshel’s Bombshell Book “The American War on Election Corruption” Hits #1 in THREE Bestseller Categories – Outpacing Lying Elites and Fraudsters appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
The exchange took place during Sunday’s episode.
Tapper directly challenged Booker, asking, “Isn’t it time for Democrats to reopen and refund DHS?”
Booker responded by claiming that Democrats have tried multiple times to fund specific parts of the agency, such as TSA, CISA, and the Coast Guard, but that Republicans have refused to fund the entire agency unless it is fully funded.
Tapper pushed back, noting, “Yeah, they want the whole agency.”
WATCH:
HOLY CRAP! Even CNN’s Jake Tapper just CALLED OUT Democrats and Sen. Cory Booker for being responsible for the DHS shutdown
CNN: “Isn’t it TIME for Democrats to reopen DHS?!”
BOOKER: “Republicans have refused!”
CNN: “They want the WHOLE agency funded!”
This is BRUTAL for… pic.twitter.com/FVKqhqRizw
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 15, 2026
The DHS shutdown, now into its second month, began after Senate Democrats blocked full funding for the agency, insisting on piecemeal appropriations for select sub-agencies while rejecting comprehensive bills.
House Republicans have passed legislation twice to end the shutdown and fully fund DHS, including H.R. 7744 on March 5, which advanced despite Democrat opposition.
Partial funding could cripple border security and immigration enforcement, especially as the nation faces an increased risk of terror attacks.
More than 300 Transportation Security Administration employees have quit since the start of the shutdown, as they have not been paid.
“Democrats are forcing TSA agents to work without pay for the third time in nearly six months. The financial hardship this Democrat-led chaos created has already forced more than 300 of these heroic officers to LEAVE the force,” DHS wrote on X on Saturday.
Democrats are forcing TSA agents to work without pay for the third time in nearly six months.
The financial hardship this Democrat-led chaos created has already forced more than 300 of these heroic officers to LEAVE the force.
Democrats must fund DHS NOW. pic.twitter.com/KAWZNnZCPd
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) March 14, 2026
“Democrats must fund DHS NOW,” the post concluded.
The post WOW: CNN’s Jake Tapper Calls Out Democrats for Being Responsible for DHS Shutdown During Interview with Cory Booker (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
WATCH: MTG Joins CNN to Criticize Trump, Says Iran Strike Means He Doesn’t Deserve Nobel Peace Prize
Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene once built her political brand as one of President Donald Trump’s most outspoken allies. Today, however, Greene increasingly sounds less like a MAGA leader and more like one of Trump’s loudest critics.
That shift was on full display during a recent CNN interview with host Caitlin Collins, where Greene delivered a barrage of attacks not only on the Trump administration’s foreign policy but on Trump himself.
For longtime Trump supporters, the moment was not shocking.
Greene’s criticism of Trump did not begin with this interview. Over the past year, Greene has repeatedly distanced herself from the core principles that defined the MAGA movement. The CNN appearance simply made the divide impossible to ignore.
During the interview, Greene openly questioned the administration’s handling of the conflict with Iran and framed the war as a betrayal of voters who supported Trump.
“This war is not something that Americans voted for in 2024,” Greene told CNN.
The criticism went even further. Greene also said Trump no longer deserves the Nobel Peace Prize—a sharp reversal from her previous praise of the president’s diplomatic record.
“At one time… I thought he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize,” Greene said. “Do I think he deserves it now? No. Absolutely not.”
Those remarks may have played well with CNN viewers, but they landed very differently among many Trump supporters.
For years, the mainstream media has mocked Trump’s foreign policy accomplishments while ignoring historic successes such as the Abraham Accords and the absence of new major wars during his first term.
Hearing those same arguments echoed by someone who once presented herself as a MAGA champion only reinforced the sense that Greene has been drifting away from the movement.
The CNN interview also included one of Greene’s most controversial claims—blaming Israel for the conflict.
“Israel pulled us into it,” she said.
That remark immediately sparked backlash among conservatives who view Iran’s regime as one of the most dangerous threats to American security and one of the world’s leading sponsors of terrorism.
But the most revealing part of the interview may have been Greene’s tone toward Trump himself.
Rather than defending the president or acknowledging the complexity of global security decisions, Greene repeatedly framed the situation as a betrayal of voters. She also criticized Congress broadly, describing it as an institution that “fails Americans over and over.”
The result was an interview that CNN eagerly amplified.
That dynamic has become increasingly common. Greene has appeared more frequently on left-leaning networks in recent months, often delivering critiques of Trump that those outlets are more than happy to broadcast.
President Trump’s movement is built around a clear political vision—strong borders, economic nationalism, peace through strength, and a willingness to challenge Washington’s political establishment.
Many MAGA voters believe those principles remain central to Trump’s leadership today.
Greene’s recent media appearances suggest she may be moving in a very different direction.
Whether she intends it or not, interviews like the one on CNN reinforce the perception that Greene is no longer speaking for the MAGA base but instead positioning herself as if she were a Democrat.
For a politician who once built her career on loyalty to Trump and the America First movement, that transformation has not gone unnoticed.
The Patriot Perspective has recently switched its main platform from Rumble to YouTube, and we would greatly appreciate it if our old subscribers would subscribe to us there. [HERE]
The post MTG Joins CNN to Criticize Trump, Says Iran Strike Means He Doesn’t Deserve Nobel Peace Prize (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Alcatraz is arguably the most famous name in American penology, yet its life as a federal prison was surprisingly short—spanning only 29 years (1934–1963). Located on a rugged island in the heart of the San Francisco Bay, it was designed not just to hold prisoners, but to break the will of the most incorrigible criminals in the country.
From the “Birdman” to Al Capone, the walls of Alcatraz have seen some of the most notorious figures in criminal history. Here is the story of the island they said no one could leave.
Long before it was a federal penitentiary, Alcatraz had a very different mission. Discovered in 1775 by Spanish explorer Juan Manuel de Ayala—who named it La Isla de los Alcatraces (Island of the Pelicans)—the land was eventually claimed for the U.S. military by President Millard Fillmore in the 1850s.
As the inmate population grew, prisoners were forced to build their own cages. They constructed a massive new cellhouse containing 600 cells, along with a hospital and mess hall—structures that still haunt the island’s skyline today.
Alcatraz was never a high-capacity facility. It averaged between 260 and 275 inmates at any given time—a tiny fraction of the federal population. However, these men were the “worst of the worst”: escape artists, violent offenders, and high-profile gang leaders.
Life on “The Rock” was defined by:
The prison’s reputation was bolstered by its infamous “guest list.” The facility held men guilty of everything from high-stakes bank robbery to cold-blooded murder. Some of the most notable included:
Over three decades, 36 men were involved in 14 separate escape attempts. The statistics speak to the difficulty of the task:
One of the most violent episodes was the “Battle of Alcatraz” in 1946. Six prisoners overpowered guards and seized weapons, but failed to secure the keys to the outer doors. The resulting standoff lasted two days, claiming the lives of two guards and three inmates.
In 1963, the heavy iron doors of Alcatraz closed for good. The reason wasn’t a lack of security, but economics.
Operating a prison on an island was a logistical nightmare. Every scrap of food, gallon of water, and liter of fuel had to be ferried across the bay. Furthermore, the salty sea air was literally dissolving the concrete and steel structures. Rather than pay for a massive renovation, the government opted to shutter the facility.
The Anti-Immigrant Policies in Trump’s Final “Big Beautiful Bill Act” Explained
Was Angela Merkel or was she not a communist agent during the Soviet era? Did Merkel or did she not remain in contact with/in the service of her former masters after the fall of the Wall, serving Russian interests to the detriment of Germany? Even a child understands that these questions are of considerable historical—and current!—importance. A child. But not the German Deep State.
The Berlin Administrative Court has once again slammed the door shut on efforts to uncover the full truth about Angela Merkel’s early ties to the East German communist regime and its notorious Stasi secret police — delivering a ruling that reeks of legal hair-splitting designed to protect the powerful rather than serve historical transparency.
In a decision handed down on March 13, 2026, the court rejected a lawsuit brought by persistent researcher and Good Governance Trade Union chairman Marcel Luthe, who sought access to all Stasi-related documents concerning Merkel from her youth in the DDR.
The judges dismissed the entire claim, slapping Luthe with €20,000 in court costs (!!) and refusing even to allow an immediate appeal in some aspects.
The core reasoning? Pure semantics: Merkel allegedly wasn’t a “person of contemporary history” (Person der Zeitgeschichte) back when the files were created — before she emerged as a spokesperson for the Demokratischer Aufbruch party around February 3, 1990.
That’s right — the entire judgment hinges on pedantic arguments about whether Merkel qualified as a public figure at the precise moment the Stasi may have documented her activities. The court insisted she was merely a “kleines Licht” (a small light, or insignificant figure) in those years, positioned “very low” in the FDJ (Free German Youth) hierarchy and not prominently involved.
Never mind that no one disputes she became one of the most powerful figures on the planet — the court retroactively shields her pre-1990 life from scrutiny because she wasn’t yet “famous enough” under the narrow terms of the Stasi Records Act.
This is exactly the kind of bureaucratic dodging that frustrates anyone demanding real accountability. The Stasi Records Act doesn’t grant blanket access, the judges lectured, and releasing everything would amount to impermissible “Ausforschung” (fishing expedition) into private matters — even citing absurd hypotheticals like whether Merkel was “grilling meatballs in the Uckermark.” (German humor)
But the real issue isn’t trivia: it’s major historical questions of public interest. Luthe highlighted three explosive areas:
Why did DDR customs impose no consequences when banned Solidarity materials were found on Merkel during a return trip from Poland — unlike similar cases that ended harshly?
Did she serve as an FDJ secretary for agitation and propaganda, a role described as a prominent political position and essentially a messenger for the regime’s ideology?
Was Merkel a Russian asset?
These aren’t fringe theories — they touch on the extent of Merkel’s compromise with the communist dictatorship that oppressed millions.
Knowing the depth of any accommodation or favoritism she may have received from the regime (or its lingering remnants) is a matter of immense public interest — especially for a woman who went on to lead unified Germany for 16 years and shape (or destroy) Europe’s destiny.
Yet the court waved away these concerns, prioritizing Merkel’s personality rights over the right of historians and citizens to understand the full scope of her DDR past.
No partial release was granted; documents predating early February 1990 remain locked away entirely. True to the Stasi tradition, Merkel herself has not consented to disclosure. Luthe vows to fight on — up to the Higher Administrative Court and even the Federal Constitutional Court if necessary.
In an era when transparency about elite entanglements with authoritarian pasts is more vital than ever, this ruling feels like another chapter in the establishment’s long effort to keep inconvenient history buried.
The German and indeed the West public deserves better than semantic shields protecting former leaders from legitimate scrutiny. Especially when these leaders have destroyed their own countries.
The post SHOCKING COVER-UP: German Court SLAMS Door on Merkel’s SECRET Stasi Files — Judges Claim She Wasn’t ‘Famous Enough’ in Communist East Germany to Deserve Scrutiny! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
The post FLASHBACK: Citizen Trump on Cuba, the Kharg Island, and Protecting Other Countries appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Republican efforts to redraw the lines of Missouri’s congressional districts won a victory Thursday as a judge ruled the way they were drawn does not violate the state’s constitution.
As noted by The Hill, the map, if it survives all court challenges, would give Missouri up to seven Republican-leaning districts while two districts lean toward Democrats.
The current map has six GOP-leaning districts and three leaning toward the Democratic Party.
The major change in the map is the new 5th District, which has sent Democrat Emmanuel Cleaver to Congress for the past two decades, according to The Hill.
Jackson County Circuit Judge Adam Caine said that the argument against the changes boils down to a claim that rural voters and urban Kansas City voters should not be in the same district, according to the Associated Press.
Caine said the concept is nothing new, noting that from 2012 to 2020, parts of Kansas City’s business district were combined with rural areas outside of the city.
“The decision of what municipalities to split is a political and policy determination that is properly left in the hands of the General Assembly and Missouri’s political processes,” Caine wrote.
Rep. Mark Alford, a Republican from Missouri, said there was no doubt the state could do what it did.
“Does the state legislature and the Governor have the authority outside of the census every ten years to redraw maps? I clearly think they do,” he said, according to WDAF-TV.
“Lastly, under the U.S. Constitution, it’s up to the state legislatures to set the time, place, and manner of elections. And this has to do with that,” he added.
“Today’s decision is consistent with what we have seen from the Supreme Court and from state courts around the country, that congressional districts can be adjusted as the people and their elected representatives see fit, more than once in a decade if needed,” Missouri House Speaker Jonathan Patterson, a Republican, said in a statement.
Just In: Circuit court judge from Missouri upholds the new congressional map in the state
Old Map:
Republicans: 6
Democrats: 2
New Map:
— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) March 12, 2026
Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway said the ruling was a victory, according to KCTV.
“This ruling is a complete victory for Missouri and for the people’s elected representatives,” she said.
“Thanks the hard work of our legal team, the Missouri FIRST Map stands, the rule of law is vindicated, and Missouri voters can have confidence that their legislature’s work has been upheld,” she said.
Despite the ruling, the redistricting effort is not home free.
The Missouri Supreme Court has heard arguments for a separate lawsuit over whether the state’s constitution allows a map to be adjusted in the middle of a decade.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
The post Republicans Score Another Big Redistricting Win as Midterm Elections Approach appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson now says the heroes who approved Operation Epic Fury, including President Trump himself, belong behind bars for daring to partner with Israel against the world’s top sponsor of terrorism.
During an appearance on Redacted with former Fox News host Clayton Morris and Natali Morris, Carlson launched into a broadside against the Trump administration’s handling of the Iran operation, warning that America had surrendered its own strategic judgment in favor of a joint war-making arrangement with Israel.
We all know the facts. President Trump took full ownership of the historic U.S.-Israel partnership in Operation Epic Fury, the decisive campaign that neutralized Iran’s nuclear ambitions, obliterated its missile programs, sank its navy, and took out Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and his top terror enablers.
Trump, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio all stood shoulder-to-shoulder with our unbreakable ally Israel in delivering the kind of “peace through strength” America hasn’t seen in decades.
As Gateway Pundit reported on February 28, Hegseth said Operation Epic Fury began “on President Trump’s orders” and called it “the most lethal, most complex, and most-precision aerial operation in history.” He also vowed that if Iran threatened Americans, “we will hunt you down, and we will kill you.”
Then, earlier this month, President Trump made it crystal clear who was in charge.
“No,” Trump said when asked if Israel forced his hand to launch these strikes against Iran.
According to the president, negotiations with Tehran were going nowhere, and he believed Iran was getting ready to launch missiles.
Reporter:
“Mr. President, did Israel force your hand to launch these strikes against Iran? Did that get the United States into this war?”President Trump:
“No, I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn’t do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that.We have great negotiators—great people, people who do this very successfully and have done it all their lives very successfully. Based on the way the negotiations were going, I think they were going to attack first, and I didn’t want that to happen.
So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand. But Israel was ready, and we were ready, and we’ve had a very, very powerful impact.”
That is what makes Carlson’s latest comments so explosive.
During the Redacted discussion, Carlson suggested that those people behind the attack should be in jail.
He also argued that the United States no longer has the diplomatic credibility to broker peace and warned that the war could spiral beyond Washington’s control.
He also voiced alarm about the possibility of further escalation, including the use of weapons of mass destruction.
He attacked the joint operation as reckless, claimed Trump was “under immense pressure from the Israelis,” dismissed concerns about Iran’s nuclear program as “silly,” and bizarrely suggested the U.S. should “secure Dimona” to stop Israel from using nuclear weapons if things escalate.
EXCLUSIVE:@TuckerCarlson is now calling for President Trump, Secretary of War @SecWar @PeteHegseth and @SecRubio to be JAILED for making the decision to partner with @Israel in bombing Iran.
He made the call for President Trump and @PeteHegseth’s arrest on @ClaytonMorris’s… pic.twitter.com/1vnqdP9G6j
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) March 14, 2026
Full transcript below:
Tucker Carlson: “So, like, who brokers the peace here? It’s not the U.S. We don’t have diplomacy anymore. We’re so discredited. Our diplomacy is seen by the rest of the world as, like, a cover for war. This is all, like, a sneaky attempt to, you know, launch a sneak attack. And whether that’s true or not—you know, you pray it’s not true—but everyone thinks it’s true, so we’re not going to negotiate an end to this. I don’t know. The losses for the U.S. are so sad that I just can’t take a victory lap. I just feel depressed.”
Clayton Morris: “Yeah, it is absolutely depressing, because so many pieces are moving at once with the U.S. economy right now. Fertilizer prices are skyrocketing. Food prices are set to go up. We’re already seeing inflation numbers over the past 24 hours going up. So all of this is going to be hitting the American family pretty hard, who was already hit very, very hard.
And we just got this statement. I want to read it to you. I’m sure you’ve already seen it. Iran’s new leader, Khamenei, just released the first statement as supreme leader, releasing it to Iranian television. It was read—he didn’t appear on video or anything like that.
But among the points that he made: the Strait of Hormuz will be shut down forever until the United States begs, basically. We will not ignore the blood of our martyrs. They will be avenged—basically, an eye for an eye. We are not an enemy of the countries around us.
We’re only targeting American bases, he said, but bombs are raining on your neighbors anyway as a result of that. Close all U.S. bases in the region, or we will attack them all.
And he calls for total Iranian unity. He says, “We will not forgo avenging the blood of the martyrs. Every citizen killed by the enemy is a case for vengeance in itself.” So it doesn’t sound like they’re done, even though President Trump yesterday said, “We’ve won this war.” It doesn’t sound like this is over anytime soon.”
Tucker Carlson: “I mean, well, it certainly doesn’t. And Trump yesterday suggested we might use nuclear weapons in Iran. So no, those are escalatory remarks. They’re not, you know, consensus-seeking remarks.
However, you know, that country—maybe not this country, but certainly Iran—seems to have lots of different factions. And of course, you know, they just threw the board in the air. A lot of people were killed. Like, it’s not exactly clear who’s running the country, who’s making the key decisions. But my impression is there are different factions, and some, you know, seek some sort of negotiated settlement sooner rather than later.
But clearly, there are a lot of people there, after all the civilian deaths, after the killing of their religious leader, and after the failed diplomacy, who, you know, want to fight till the end. The question is: What does that mean?
And I just worry that, you know, Israel is going to find itself in a position where, you know, it uses weapons of mass destruction. I’m not even attacking Israel, by the way. It’s the size of New Jersey, so you can see why they would feel threatened. I don’t think they should ever use nuclear weapons.
I think the United States should tell the Netanyahu government, absolutely not. In fact, we’re going to secure Dimona. We’re going to secure your nuclear sites.
You’re not allowed to use nuclear weapons, because that could begin a cascade that ends the world. So you’re not allowed to do that, actually, Netanyahu.
But I do understand how, if their cities are getting bombed and the United States can’t stop that from happening, and they run out of missile defense or adequate missile defense, and maybe the bombing moves to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv—I mean, you can see this getting super radical, which is one of the main arguments I made against starting it in the first place. You don’t control it once it starts. There are other players here.
I didn’t realize it was going to be a joint operation with a country that believes in Amalek. You know, whoever made that decision should be in jail.
When was the last time the U.S. military partnered, on a decision-making level, with another country in a war?
Like, that’s crazy. You can have symbolic partners, but you can’t have a partner who has co-equal decision-making authority, because your interests are different. And you could wind up harming your own interests, and those of the world, very gravely. So you don’t do that, because you can’t make a clear decision.
And I think that we’re not far from that right now. Like, their goals have always been different from our goals. Trump was convinced they had a nuclear program.
I thought that was silly, but he seemed to believe it. He was also under immense pressure from the Israelis to do this, because they were going to do it anyway, as the Secretary of State revealed. That’s true.
But I don’t think there was any evidence that Trump wanted, you know, to commit ground troops to Iran or some protracted war over, you know, the killing of a religious leader or Amalek or these weird end-times fantasies that, honestly, both sides are engaging in—the Israelis especially, just being honest. Amalek? Are you kidding? How can—by the way, Western civilization has no place for Amalek.”
Related story:
The post Tucker Carlson Suggests President Trump and Top Officials Behind U.S.-Israel Iran Strike Decision Be Thrown in Jail appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
