In a major win for the pro-life movement, the House Appropriations Committee approved language last week that prohibits any federal funds in the Fiscal Year 2027 Defense Appropriations bill from being used to conduct or support research involving human fetal tissue obtained from induced abortions.
The provision directly targets the use of tissue from aborted babies in experiments funded by the Department of Defense.
“None of the funds provided in this Act may be used to conduct or support research using human fetal tissue if such tissue is obtained pursuant to an induced abortion,” the bill text states.
This development follows an investigation by White Coat Waste that exposed how the Pentagon had been awarding grants for disturbing animal experiments involving parts from aborted human fetuses.
Those experiments included implanting fetal fingers, scalps, skin, organs, bone marrow, thymus, and liver tissue into mice and monkeys to create “humanized” animal models.
On March 20, the four chairs of the House Pro-Life Caucus sent a formal letter to the leaders of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee urging them to include the language.
The signers were Rep. Robert F. Onder, Jr., Rep. Kat Cammack, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, and Rep. Michelle Fischbach.
The letter highlighted a specific Biden-era DOD grant to the University of Wisconsin-Madison totaling $1,724,662. Part of that funding was sub-awarded to support research using fetal tissue obtained from aborted babies.
The funding period was still active, raising concerns that similar research could continue.
The Pro-Life Caucus chairs noted that the Trump administration had already taken decisive action at the National Institutes of Health.
In January, NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya announced that the NIH would no longer support research using human fetal tissue from elective abortions.
The letter argued that Congress should extend this protection to all federally funded medical research, including that conducted by the Department of Defense.
On Wednesday, the full House Appropriations Committee approved the FY2027 Defense Appropriations Act by a vote of 34 to 27.
The critical fetal tissue restriction was part of the “Calvert #2 (Republican En Bloc)” amendment package, which passed 32 to 25.
This package also included blocking DEI and CRT programs in the military.
Photos shared by Venezuelans on the ground show buildings destroyed throughout La Guaira, one of the areas hardest hit by the earthquake.
A powerful earthquake has devastated parts of Venezuela, reducing buildings to rubble, knocking out communications, and leaving families desperately searching for missing loved ones.
In the days following the disaster, I contacted numerous Venezuelans through missing-person posts and databases created to help families locate relatives. Several of those individuals responded, sharing firsthand accounts of their experiences during and after the disaster.
Their eyewitness testimonies, originally sent to me in Spanish and translated into English via Google Translate, paint a picture not only of a devastating natural disaster but of a country whose emergency response systems had already been hollowed out long before the ground began to shake.
Among those I spoke with was Jorge Perdomo, who spent two days trying to locate his best friend, Edison Jesús Morales, after all communication with him suddenly stopped.
Jorge told me Edison had lived through “the most terrifying moment of his life,” describing his survival as “a miracle from God.”
Two days later, Edison finally managed to make contact.
“Brother, don’t worry. I’m okay,” he told Jorge. “I went through hell.”
Edison described being inside a three-story home when the earthquake struck.
“The apartment was shaking like when you shake a matchbox,” he recalled. “That’s exactly what it was like.”
Water tanks and heavy barrels were thrown around as the building violently shook before he and those inside were finally able to escape.
“Nothing happened to us, thank God,” he said. “But it’s really bad.”
Buildings were destroyed throughout La Guaira, one of the areas hardest hit by the earthquake.
While Edison survived, Jorge said what happened after the earthquake revealed an even bigger problem. When I asked whether the government’s response had made a difference, Jorge answered without hesitation.
“Unfortunately, it would have been the same.”
“In the end, we see the reality of what happened.”
According to Jorge, rescue operations were crippled because communities simply lacked the equipment needed to save lives.
“There is no machinery and no light to support people at night or during the day,” he said.
Instead, he explained, ordinary Venezuelans became the rescue crews.
“We Venezuelans were the ones who solved it.”
He said neighbors dug through collapsed buildings themselves.
“People pulled others out with their hands because they did not have tools.”
Hospitals, he said, faced similar problems.
“There was no medicine or supplies,” Jorge explained.
Instead, ordinary Venezuelans themselves “managed to fill the hospitals with medicine,” despite those being resources “the government itself should provide.”
His account reflects what many survivors near the epicenter described.
International coverage has largely focused on Caracas, but the capital sits roughly 100 miles from the earthquake’s epicenter. Communities much closer to the disaster have suffered extensive damage, while widespread power outages and communications failures have made it nearly impossible for many families to contact loved ones or share images of what has happened. Online reports from residents in the affected areas closely mirror the accounts shared with me.
One resident wrote that an apartment building had completely collapsed.
“All the floors collapsed,” the person said. “We don’t know if there are people trapped in the rubble. We’re taking refuge in the school.”
Another resident described severe structural damage inside a home.
“The whole room is cracked, as is a column in another room, but the most affected one even has a cracked ceiling.”
Another report simply read:
“Building collapse.”
For Jorge, however, the greatest tragedy was not simply the earthquake itself. It was what decades of corruption had left behind.
“The government obviously has us in a bad state, whether Maduro is there or not,” he said.
Later, he added:
“There are no changes. Everything remains the same, and sometimes even worse.”
“As long as those who were with Maduro remain in command, this country will continue going to ruin.”
Those comments reflect a broader frustration shared by many Venezuelans. Despite possessing some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, survivors described communities without heavy rescue equipment, emergency lighting, adequate medical supplies, or even basic tools needed to pull people from collapsed buildings.
Money and humanitarian aid can arrive after a disaster. But when roads, infrastructure, communications systems, emergency equipment, and government institutions have deteriorated over many years, survivors told me those resources often cannot reach the people who need them most.
The Trump administration has already committed assistance to the Venezuelan people. But there is only so much foreign aid can accomplish when the institutions responsible for responding to disasters have been weakened for years.
The message I have heard repeatedly from the Venezuelans who contacted me is that this tragedy reflects something much larger than a natural disaster. The earthquake exposed the consequences of years of corruption, mismanagement, and institutional decay.
If anything good can come from a tragedy in which thousands are feared dead, tens of thousands remain missing, and countless families still cannot reach loved ones, survivors hope it is that the world recognizes how severely years of government corruption weakened Venezuela before disaster struck.
When governments become systems of entrenched authoritarian corruption, public institutions often deteriorate while those in power preserve themselves. For years, Venezuelans have warned about that reality.
When the earthquake struck, many told me they felt the consequences immediately—not because the earth shook, but because when it did, there was almost nothing left to help them.
The Texas Supreme Court has temporarily blocked Harris County from spending taxpayer dollars on legal services for individuals facing federal deportation proceedings, marking a significant victory for state officials seeking to curb what they view as the misuse of public funds.
The order, issued Friday, halts further spending from Harris County’s Immigrant Legal Services Fund while litigation continues over whether the program violates the Texas Constitution. Although the court has not issued a final ruling on the merits, it concluded there is “serious doubt” about the program’s constitutionality and ordered the county to suspend additional disbursements until further notice.
The decision sends a clear message that local governments cannot use taxpayer money to advance politically driven immigration policies without constitutional scrutiny.
The Texas Supreme Court rules, for now, that Harris County cannot use tax dollars to fund illegal immigrant legal challenges to deportation.
That is not a function of county government.
It’s just another example of wasteful spending by local governments that must end. pic.twitter.com/hrgHMp6VPu
Harris County established the Immigrant Legal Services Fund in 2020 with an initial $2 million appropriation to provide free legal representation for individuals in federal immigration proceedings. Since then, county leaders have continued funding the program, including a recent $1.34 million allocation to nonprofit organizations representing individuals facing deportation.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenged the latest expenditure, arguing that using public funds for this purpose violates the Texas Constitution’s prohibition against granting public money for private purposes. The Texas Supreme Court agreed that the constitutional questions raised are substantial enough to justify immediately halting the spending while the lawsuit proceeds.
A Check on Local Government Overreach
For years, Harris County officials, led by County Judge Lina Hidalgo and the Democratic majority on Commissioners Court, have embraced progressive immigration policies that critics argue exceed the proper role of county government.
Rather than focusing taxpayer resources on traditional local responsibilities such as public safety, infrastructure, flood control, and essential services, county leaders chose to finance legal representation for individuals facing removal under federal immigration law.
Supporters describe the program as ensuring due process. Critics counter that it effectively transforms local government into an advocate against federal immigration enforcement using taxpayer dollars.
Governor Greg Abbott welcomed the court’s decision, stating:
“The Texas Supreme Court rules, for now, that Harris County cannot use tax dollars to fund illegal immigrant legal challenges to deportation.”
The temporary injunction represents an important check on local governments that attempt to circumvent state policy through taxpayer-funded activism.
No Constitutional Right to Taxpayer-Funded Immigration Lawyers
Unlike criminal defendants, individuals in civil immigration proceedings are not constitutionally entitled to government-funded legal counsel. While immigrants remain free to hire private attorneys or obtain assistance from charitable organizations, critics argue taxpayers should not be compelled to finance those legal services.
With Houston confronting ongoing challenges involving crime, homelessness, transportation infrastructure, and disaster preparedness, many Texans question whether millions of public dollars should instead be directed toward defending individuals against federal deportation proceedings.
Attorney General Paxton’s lawsuit reinforces the principle that local governments cannot simply redefine their responsibilities by subsidizing activities that conflict with state law or exceed constitutional limitations on public spending.
A Broader Pattern of Sanctuary Policies
The Harris County case reflects a broader trend in progressive jurisdictions across the country.
Rather than formally refusing to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, many local governments have created publicly funded deportation defense programs that critics view as de facto sanctuary policies financed through taxpayer dollars.
Supporters argue these programs promote fairness and due process. Opponents contend they undermine immigration enforcement, delay lawful removals, and divert scarce public resources away from essential government functions.
The Texas Supreme Court’s stay signals that courts may be willing to scrutinize whether such expenditures satisfy constitutional requirements governing the use of taxpayer funds.
The implications of the Harris County case could extend well beyond Texas.
More than two dozen cities, counties, and several states—including California, New York, Washington, Illinois, Oregon, and Massachusetts—have established publicly funded deportation defense programs, collectively committing tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to provide legal representation for individuals facing removal proceedings.
Many of those programs operate under state constitutions and statutory frameworks that differ significantly from Texas law. Nevertheless, the Harris County litigation highlights a potential vulnerability for similar initiatives nationwide: whether taxpayer-funded immigration defense serves a sufficiently clear public purpose to justify the expenditure of public funds.
If Texas ultimately prevails, lawmakers and attorneys general in other conservative-leaning states may pursue comparable constitutional challenges or enact legislation restricting local governments from financing deportation defense programs.
The Road Ahead
The Texas Supreme Court’s order is only a temporary stay while the underlying lawsuit proceeds through the appellate process. The court has not issued a final decision on whether Harris County’s program violates the Texas Constitution.
Still, the ruling represents a significant early victory for state officials challenging the legality of taxpayer-funded immigration defense.
For many Texans, the case raises a broader question about the proper role of local government. Public funds are intended to support core governmental responsibilities such as roads, law enforcement, emergency services, schools, and infrastructure.
As litigation continues, the case is likely to become one of the most closely watched legal battles over the intersection of immigration policy, local government authority, and taxpayer protections.
The US military on Saturday conducted additional strikes against multiple targets in Iran.
The US launched an additional round of strikes after Iran attacked another ship in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday.
Per CENTCOM:
U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) forces conducted additional strikes against multiple targets in Iran, June 27, at the Commander in Chief’s direction.
After yesterday’s U.S. strikes in response to the Iranian attack on M/V Ever Lovely, Iran was given a chance to honor the ceasefire agreement but elected not to when its forces launched a one-way attack drone that hit M/T Kiku this morning at 4:30 a.m. ET.
The Panama-flagged tanker was transiting near the Strait of Hormuz with more than two-million barrels of crude oil.
CENTCOM forces launched strikes today in direct response to continued Iranian aggression against commercial shipping.
U.S. military aircraft targeted Iranian military surveillance infrastructure, communication systems, air defense sites, drone storage facilities, and minelayer capabilities.
Commercial vessel transits through the Strait of Hormuz continue. U.S. forces remain vigilant, lethal, and ready.
The US military on Friday struck Iran in response to an attack on a commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz.
On Thursday, Iranian drones attacked a Singapore-flagged cargo ship exiting the Strait of Hormuz amid a ‘ceasefire agreement.’
Earlier Friday, President Trump said Iran’s attack was a “foolish violation of our ceasefire agreement.”
“The Islamic Republic of Iran shot at least four One Way Attack Drones at Ships transversing the Strait of Hormuz. One of the Drones solidly hit the upper deck of a large and very expensive Cargo Carrying Ship. Damage was done, but the Ship was able to proceed on its way. We knocked down three other Drones. Obviously, this is a foolish violation of our Ceasefire Agreement,” Trump said.
Later Friday, the US military conducted strikes against Iranian missile and drone storage locations.
Iran’s nuclear standoff has entered a more dangerous phase, because the world still does not know what damage the war did or what Tehran may be hiding.
Quick Take
The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran now needs a very strong verification system after the war to block any move toward nuclear weapons.
Rafael Grossi says the new framework deal puts Iran’s nuclear activities under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision.
Tehran is still disputing access to bombed sites and denies there is a clear inspection plan.
Inspectors have lost continuity of knowledge about Iran’s stockpiles, which makes any deal less certain.
Verification, Not Promises
International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said Friday that Iran needs a very strong verification system after the recent conflict. He said Iran’s stated intent is not enough, because the key question is whether inspectors can prove compliance in practice. Grossi said the goal of the US-Iran agreement is to make sure Iran does not develop nuclear weapons, and that this should happen as soon as practical.[1][2]
That warning matters because Iran’s nuclear file has been built on a gap between declarations and proof. The International Atomic Energy Agency has said it could not access all nuclear sites after the June war, and that it no longer had continuity of knowledge over Iran’s nuclear materials. A Chatham House analysis said inspectors have still not returned to all sites, including damaged facilities, and that no clear timeline has been set.[1][6]
Why the Dispute Is So Sharp
Grossi pushed back against Tehran’s claim that no inspection deal exists. He said the memorandum of understanding signed by both sides says the nuclear activities will be supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency, and he said inspections will happen. He also said the timing is less important than the fact that access must come, because without inspectors there is no real verification system.[2][4]
Iran’s foreign ministry tells a different story. Spokesman Esmail Baghaei said Iran does not intend to allow inspectors to visit the damaged sites and said no procedure is in place for those visits. He also said Iran had not met with Grossi, which directly clashes with the US version of events. That split leaves the agreement sounding stronger in public than it may be on the ground.[9][11]
A Broader Pattern of Weak Trust
The current fight fits a long pattern in nuclear diplomacy. Verification deals often look firm on paper, but they can still fail when states restrict access, delay inspections, or fight over what the rules really mean. Historical analysis of IAEA safeguards shows that the agency depends heavily on state declarations, which means trust and access remain central even when the technical tools are strong.[16][17][19]
That is why this dispute has drawn attention far beyond Iran. If inspectors cannot confirm the condition of uranium stockpiles, damaged sites, and centrifuge cascades, then no one can say with confidence what Iran can do next. Arms control analysts say the agency has already lost key knowledge about Iran’s program, and that future monitoring must rebuild that baseline before any real limits can be trusted.[6][8][13]
The politics around the deal also reflect a bigger public mood. Many Americans, on both the right and left, are tired of hearing that major problems are “handled” while the facts remain murky. This case shows why. A war has damaged nuclear sites, both sides are talking past each other, and the agency meant to provide answers still lacks full access. In that setting, verification is not a side issue. It is the whole story.[1][2][6]
Louis Farrakhan’s wife, Khadijah Farrakhan, has died.
She was 90 years old.
The Nation of Islam made the announcement on Saturday.
The hate preacher was married to his wife for 72 years.
The cause of death was not publicly released.
The Honorable Minister @LouisFarrakhan with deep sadness yet with profound gratitude to Allah informs you that his beloved wife of 72 years, the First Lady of the Nation of Islam, Mother Khadijah has returned to Allah (may Allah be pleased). pic.twitter.com/W9K4jG6v4E
In June of 2018 Louis Farrakhan tweeted about the “satanic Jew.”
In October 2019 Louis Farrakhan compared Jews to termites.
Louis Farrakhan previously led chants of “Death to America!” in Tehran.
And Obama – the most anti-American president in US history was paying Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam $364,500 to teach Islam in US prisons.
Obama also secretly met with racist Louis Farrakhan in 2005, however the photo of the two didn’t surface until after Obama left the White House. The media was protecting Obama.
An illegal alien from Colombia has been charged in the brutal murder of his own stepfather in Florida last weekend.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) just provided Border Hawk with exclusive information about the suspect, including his immigration background.
On June 20, police were called to a residence in Miramar, a city in the Miami suburbs.
“Deputies entered the home at around 3 a.m. and encountered a gruesome scene and an ‘unresponsive’ male who was later pronounced deceased.” Border Hawk Reported.
Authorities found an axe, a knife, and a sword with blood on it. The stepson was trying to avoid police by hiding in a bathroom that was locked.
18-year-old Juan Andres Gonzalez-Diaz was arrested and is facing charges of first-degree murder.
Authorities think that Gonzalez-Diaz killed his stepfather after he fell asleep in the dining room but were not sure why.
He was possibly seen adjusting security cameras inside the home a little before the killing.
According to DHS, Gonazlez-Diaz entered the country on a tourist visa in 2018 that expired in six months but overstayed his visit by many years.
DHS filed an immigration detainer in Florida to prevent the release of Gonzalez-Diaz from jail. Florida has worked with ICE to make sure that illegal aliens that are in law enforcement custody are turned over to ICE.
This criminal illegal alien BRUTALLY MURDERED HIS OWN STEPFATHER.
Juan Andres Gonzalez-Diaz, from Colombia, used a KNIFE, SWORD, AND AXE to attack and kill his sleeping stepfather. Gonzalez-Diaz entered the country on a tourist visa in 2018 and overstayed his visa.@ICEgov is… https://t.co/OV7fOT9Pezpic.twitter.com/RLJslfgPsQ
Residents of a small Massachusetts island community are shocked and furious upon learning from town officials that they may not be able to fly American flags to celebrate the nation’s upcoming 250th birthday.
As Fox News reported on Saturday, homeowners on Plum Island received a letter from the town of Newbury warning them last week that it had become aware of multiple “devices and materials intended to deter” protected shorebirds from frequenting beach and dune systems.
These materials included “mylar streamers, flags, and reflective materials.”
The letter goes on to mention that homeowners could face significant financial penalties for failing to comply with the state and federal Endangered Species Acts, which Newbury town officials have vowed to enforce.
“Activities intended to deter protected shorebirds from utilizing suitable habitat may be viewed as harassment or disruption of normal feeding, nesting, or migratory behavior,” which is prohibited under the state and federal Endangered Species Acts, and “carry significant regulatory and financial penalties,” the letter reads.
“Non-compliance may result in state or federal enforcement actions and, thus, the Town urges residents to comply with applicable state and federal wildlife protection laws.”
When Fox News went to speak with the residents, they were stunned to see flags included in the letter.
“Are you serious?!” Marc Sarkady, who has lived on the island for over 30 years, said, “You’re telling me I can’t fly American flags on my property to celebrate America 250?”
Sarkady also pointed out that there were “10 miles of open beach” free of houses where the birds can frequent.
Before receiving the letter last week, Sarkady and other residents took pains to prepare for a major 4th of July celebration honoring America’s 250th birthday.
Prior to receiving the letter last week, Sarkady and other community members launched a grassroots effort to distribute American flags and signs to commemorate America’s 250th anniversary. They distributed around 50 American flags and around 100 revolutionary-style flag signs reading, “Plum Island Honors America” to residents across the island.
“It’s really us trying to bring the island together — everybody, by the way, not left, not right, America, American citizens, and really reaching out. That’s really the spirit of what I’m trying to do here,” Sarkady explained.
Town officials, though, are trying to deny that they were prohibiting patriotic displays, including flying American flags. Of course, the letter’s clear language suggests otherwise.
According to Newbury Town Administrator Tracy Blais, the town agreed to MassWildlife’s request to help “spread the word” about protecting endangered species.
There are also other reasons to doubt the town’s protestations. Sarkady said that a Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife official sent a threatening letter to one of his neighbors last year after she put up ornamental banners on her beachside lawn.
The language of the letter was almost identical to that of the one received about the flags.
Sarkady alleged the state official then called his neighbor directly, vowing serious penalties if she did not comply.
European countries under the unchecked mass migration scourge are endlessly plagued by terrorist attacks from so-called ‘asylum seekers.’
Besides the rapes, stabbing and lynchings, one relentless feature is the weaponizing of motor vehicles – an efficient way to kill and maim the helpless native populations.
Saudi asylum activist Taleb Al Abdulmohsen who self descibed as a ‘leftist’ has now been convicted and sentenced to life in prison for murdering six people and injuring hundreds more at a Christmas market in Germany in 2024.
Also today, in the UK, a Somali migrant has been arrested on ‘suspicion of attempted murder’ after allegedly driving his car against multiple pedestrians.
“Five people were injured, with two being treated at the scene and three taken to hospital after the incident in Ealing Broadway, London just before 2.30pm on Saturday.
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: “At this time, it is believed they have all suffered non-life-threatening or life-changing injuries.
‘The car involved did not stop at the scene but was stopped in nearby Grange Park a short time later. The driver, a 34-year-old Somalia-born British man, was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving and attempted murder’.”
A Somalian has been arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving and attempted murder after five pedestrians were injured when a car drove into them in west London this afternoon. pic.twitter.com/lGbedye2i7
As for the potential motive, so far, the incident is not being treated as terrorism.
It’s just another non-assimilating ‘UK citizen’, right?
“Road closures are in place in the area and could remain in place for some time while the police investigation progresses.
[…] A London Ambulance Service spokesperson said it dispatched ‘a number of resources including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars, a volunteer emergency responder crew and an incident response officer to the scene’.”
Law & Border Host Ben Bergquam talked about this week’s Supreme Court decision to end temporary protected status for Haitians and Syrians.
“This video is for all of the idiots out there who are screaming about the temporary protective status being taken away from the so-called Haitians and Syrians that illegally entered our country under Joe Biden,” Bergquam said.
Bergquam collected numerous discarded passports of illegal aliens while they were making their way to the United States under Biden’s open border invitation. Many of them had already been given protected status in another country, but were told they had a better chance of getting into the US if authorities didn’t know that.
“This is a tiny fraction of some of the souvenirs that I gathered over the four years of Joe Biden’s border invasion. And really not Joe Biden, but the string pullers that were running Joe Biden’s office,” Bergquam said.
“Bag after bag after bag. Passports from all over the world, from every country that I know of and some countries I’d never heard of before,” Bergquam continued.
“Passports all over the world all dumped. India, Pakistan, China, Ukraine,” Bergquam continued.
Bergquam also showed shoes that have a carpet bottom that illegals would use to cover their tracks.
“They have an entire town dedicated to selling equipment to come into our country illegally. Some of those are carpet shoes,” Bergquam said of Mexico.
Bergquam explained that many of these illegals who came into the US already had protective status in another country.
“I collected thousands of ID’s during this time. I’ve turned in hundreds of them to the federal government to try to track some of these people down. In particular, the ones claiming that they were coming for political asylum, yet they dumped their ID’s. Many of them from countries where they had already been given protection,” Bergquam explained.
“This is the lie that the Democrats don’t want you to know. The vast majority of the so-called Haitians that came into our country illegally, came from Chile and Brazil,” Bergquam said.
“Out of all the years I was in Colombia, and Panama and Guatemala and Mexico, I did not meet a single Haitian that was coming from Haiti. All of them had been living for the last five to ten years in Chile and Brazil. They had left Haiti. They had moved to Chile and Brazil. They had been given protective status,” Bergquam continued.
“The only reason they were coming to America under Joe Biden was because the open borders Democrats invited them,” Bergquam said.
The NGOs were working with the federal government during the Biden era to help these illegals get into the US.
“Why they were dumping their IDs. They said they were told they had an easier time coming into our country if we didn’t know they had already been given protective status. And that’s true. If you have already been given protective status then you don’t qualify for it in America,” Bergquam explained.
Watch:
To all the idiots out there upset about the Supreme Court upholding the law and sending Haitians and Syrian illegals back home… listen up.
And the fake news, stop lying!
The vast majority of Haitian illegals that came across were actually from Chile and Brazil. They had spent… pic.twitter.com/2Gnakz4z3Q
— Ben Bergquam – Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) News (@BenBergquam) June 27, 2026
(@TRobinsonNewEra) 
