Elon Musk’s birthday has become less a party and more a mirror of how power, protest, and platforms shape public life.
Story Snapshot
June 28 marks Elon Musk’s birthday, a date now used for both praise and protest.
Musk confirmed the date and often treats it as a work day, not a party day.
Activists organized June 28 events to challenge his influence and wealth.
Family and fans post tributes while institutions stay mostly quiet.
Verified Birth Date And Personal Acknowledgments
Public records and family accounts place Elon Musk’s birth on June 28, 1971, in Pretoria, South Africa. Reporting in 2024 documented Musk posting a throwback photo and marking his fifty-third birthday on social media, which reinforced the confirmed date and his habit of public engagement with fans [2]. His mother, Maye Musk, also posted a birthday message with celebratory images, adding a direct family acknowledgment of the milestone. These sources establish the date and show the personal, not official, nature of the recognition [10].
Past comments suggest Musk often spends the day working. In 2019, he told followers he would be working on Tesla’s global logistics on his birthday, a statement that supports the broader pattern of a low-key, work-centered approach rather than a lavish event [8]. Major outlets in 2024 did not report a formal public party. That absence, along with family and social posts, points to a personal milestone observed mainly online rather than with an organized corporate or public celebration [2].
Protests Rebrand The Day As A Political Stage
Activist groups have reframed June 28 as a date to press their case against Musk’s influence and wealth. Coverage documented more than fifty “Musk Must Fall” events planned across the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Finland. Organizers cited his public status and ties to political debates as reasons to rally. One campaign page described June 28 as a “Global Day of Celebration” of movement goals, turning a birthday into a protest brand and fundraising tool [1].
Protest listings named specific sites, including a Tesla location in Pennsylvania, and described multiple West Coast actions. Critics argued that Musk’s political engagement and economic power justify public pressure on that day. Supporters countered with birthday messages and praise online. The clash turned a private milestone into public theater. The evidence confirms organized events and intent, but it does not prove claims about government capture or secret deals that some activists allege without documents [1].
Why This Date Draws Fans, Traders, And Skeptics
Crypto and tech communities now treat June 28 as a cultural marker. Commentary describes how blockchain traders and online groups post tributes and sometimes spin stories about market moves tied to Musk. The attention reflects his impact on cars, rockets, and social media, and on coin sentiment. While the cultural buzz is clear, hard data connecting the birthday to lasting market changes is thin, so claims of consistent price effects remain more lore than fact [3].
Public institutions and large companies mostly stay silent. That restraint fits a wider trend where leaders avoid picking sides in polarizing debates around powerful figures. For readers across the spectrum, the lesson is simple: a personal date became a proxy fight over influence, wealth, and free speech. Fans see innovation. Foes see outsized sway and weak checks. Both sides see a system that often serves insiders. The day exposes that shared fear, more than any cake or candles.
Retired Navy Captain and U.S. Senator Mark Kelly has filed a civil lawsuit against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, challenging the Pentagon’s censure and demotion proceedings after he and five other Democratic lawmakers urged U.S. troops to refuse unlawful orders, which the government argues undermined military discipline.
When six Democratic lawmakers released a video in November 2025 urging U.S. troops to refuse unlawful military orders, they framed it as a defense of the Constitution. The Trump administration called it sedition.
The video appeared against the backdrop of two controversial administration actions: the deployment of National Guard troops to U.S. cities, a policy being actively litigated in federal court, and U.S. military strikes on suspected drug-trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.
It is important to note that no court had issued a final ruling determining either policy to be illegal, nor had any court found that illegal orders were given to individual U.S. troops. Equally significant, even if the Supreme Court were to ultimately determine that the president lacked the authority to order these deployments, the duties carried out by individual soldiers would not necessarily constitute illegal orders. Both issues involve complex questions of constitutional law that ordinary soldiers are neither trained nor qualified to adjudicate.
The lawmakers named neither action in the video, nor did they identify any specific order they considered unlawful. That omission would prove legally significant. Under military law, there is a critical distinction between reminding soldiers of a constitutional principle and encouraging them to act on their own political judgments. The latter is not a constitutional safeguard. It is a prescription for insubordination, and in some circumstances a crime.
The senator at the center of the resulting legal battle is Mark Kelly, a Democratic U.S. Senator from Arizona, a retired Navy Captain, and a former NASA astronaut who commanded multiple Space Shuttle missions.
Kelly and his five colleagues, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, Rep. Jason Crow, Rep. Chris Deluzio, Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, and Rep. Maggie Goodlander, all veterans or former intelligence officers, released the video as the administration was actively discussing domestic military deployments. President Trump characterized the lawmakers’ actions as “seditious behavior” punishable by death. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally censured Kelly, placing a Letter of Censure in his permanent military record accusing him of “conduct unbecoming an officer” and undermining the chain of command, and initiated administrative proceedings to strip him of his retired rank of Navy Captain, a move that would significantly reduce his pension.
A Washington grand jury declined to criminally indict Kelly, but the administrative battle has continued in civil court. Kelly filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Kelly v. Hegseth, 1:26-cv-00081), seeking to block the censure, halt the demotion proceedings, and protect his pension. On February 12, 2026, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Pentagon from reducing Kelly’s rank or cutting his pension while the case proceeds. The Justice Department has since appealed. The clash has turned Kelly into a Democratic fundraising figure, with his campaign pulling in tens of millions of dollars from donors who view the Pentagon’s actions as an attack on free speech.
The lawsuit rests on two legal arguments. Kelly contends the executive branch is unconstitutionally retaliating against him for political speech made as a civilian, in violation of the First Amendment. He also argues that the Pentagon cannot use military law to discipline an elected member of the legislative branch without violating the separation of powers.
The government’s counter-argument invokes 10 U.S.C. § 1370, the federal statute governing military retirement grades. The Pentagon’s position is that “satisfactory service” in a retired rank is not locked in at the moment of retirement; a retiree drawing a pension must continue to maintain conduct befitting that rank, and Kelly’s video constitutes a current failure to meet that standard.
Kelly’s legal team argues that “satisfactory service” can only evaluate conduct while the officer was on active duty, which ended for Kelly in 2011, and that applying the statute to civilian political speech made fifteen years after retirement is legally unsupportable.
The deeper question, however, is whether Kelly’s video was legally defensible in the first place. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the federal law governing military conduct, orders issued through the chain of command, extending to the President as Commander-in-Chief, carry a presumption of legality.
Individual soldiers are neither constitutional scholars nor courts. They are not authorized to independently adjudicate whether a presidential directive is lawful before executing it. The soldier’s oath includes both defending the Constitution and obeying the orders of the President and superior officers.
Kelly and the other Democrats did not claim that any of Trump’s orders issued so far were illegal, leading to criticism that they were implying illegality where there was none, which could lead to insubordination and disarray in the military. On several Sunday morning talk shows, none of the lawmakers involved could point to a specific illegal order given by the president. By publicly warning troops to watch for “unlawful orders” without identifying any, Kelly was not invoking a legal principle. He was introducing political doubt into the chain of command.
The My Lai massacre, in which 2nd Lt. William Calley ordered his men to execute Vietnamese civilians during the Vietnam War, is the standard reference point in military training for the duty to refuse a manifestly illegal order. A manifestly illegal order is one so obviously criminal that any person of ordinary sense would recognize it immediately as such. That standard does not apply to the complex constitutional questions surrounding domestic military deployments.
The Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits federal troops from performing domestic law enforcement functions. However, the president retains several statutory authorities to deploy troops domestically under defined circumstances. The deployments that formed the backdrop to Kelly’s video were carried out under different legal authorities depending on the city: federalization of National Guard troops under 10 U.S.C. § 12406 in Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland; a separate authority applicable to the District of Columbia; and 32 U.S.C. § 502(f) in Memphis, where the governor consented to the deployment.
The Insurrection Act, which grants broader authority and explicitly overrides the Posse Comitatus Act, was repeatedly threatened but never invoked. Whether any specific statutory authority was validly exercised is a complex constitutional question that no individual soldier standing on a street corner is equipped to resolve.
The operational tasks assigned to troops in such deployments, including securing perimeters, guarding infrastructure, and providing logistical support to federal agents, are not manifestly illegal in the way an order to kill civilians would be. A soldier who refuses a lawful operational order based solely on the personal belief that the president exceeded his constitutional authority risks committing the offense of willful disobedience under Article 90 of the UCMJ.
Kelly’s defense team argues the video was not an instruction to soldiers to independently evaluate constitutional law or stage a mutiny, but rather a preemptive reminder that their ultimate allegiance is to the constitutional framework, not to any individual. The video’s actual language, however, contradicts that characterization. Kelly stated directly: “Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.”
The video further told troops that “threats to our Constitution” were coming “from right here at home,” language that explicitly invited soldiers to form their own judgment about the legality of orders they were receiving in connection with ongoing domestic deployments. Determining whether an order is illegal requires precisely the kind of constitutional and legal analysis that individual soldiers are neither trained nor authorized to perform. The defense team’s framing of the video as a generalized constitutional reminder cannot be reconciled with language that pointed soldiers toward active domestic operations and told them their laws were clear.
The legal team also contends that Kelly’s statements as a sitting U.S. senator constitute protected political speech, and that using administrative UCMJ proceedings to strip a sitting lawmaker of his retired rank over public statements sets a dangerous precedent. However, calls to action encouraging insurrection, rebellion, or insubordination are not protected speech, regardless of whether Kelly is an elected official.
The court must now determine whether Kelly’s statements constitute protected speech or an actionable attempt to undermine military discipline and the chain of command, a distinction the Constitution does not resolve in his favor by default. There is little modern precedent for such a case, making Kelly v. Hegseth largely uncharted legal territory.
Naked pride parade participants take over the Seattle Center water fountain, with multiple children present
Fully naked adults exposed themselves to children in Seattle, Washington, at a pride parade on Sunday.
Hundreds of thousands reportedly gathered in downtown Seattle to revel in sexual degeneracy.
It’s a typical scene during Pride Month in liberal cities across the nation. The Gateway Pundit has reported on past Seattle Pride parades, where, likewise, naked men rode bikes and flashed children as they rode by. Of course, the police do nothing as nude adults abuse young children with indecent exposure.
In California on Saturday, thousands of nude bikers also participated in the World Naked Bike Ride, where they stripped nude and rode bicycles around the city. One vigilante was actually arrested on charges of assault with a deadly weapon for shooting bikers with his BB gun in a wild turn of events.
In one video from this past Sunday, fully naked adults are seen prancing around the Seattle Center water fountain following the parade with dozens of young boys and girls present. One man appears to chase a young boy around the fountain with his genitals swinging around. (WARNING: NUDITY)
In another video, nude bike and roller skate riders expose themselves to the city with children present.
A large group of “furries,” dressed in animal costumes, is also seen walking by as innocent children watch, clap, and high-five the predatory individuals. A black Mini Cooper is then seen driving through the parade with a giant black d**do on the hood, and people wearing demented costumes follow– all in front of children as young as toddlers.
WATCH:
Fully nude bicyclists participated in the Seattle Pride Parade, riding past children with their exposed genitalia.
Democrat Senate Nominee Ruben Gallego admits his father is a convicted drug trafficker
Democratic Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego is now facing a Department of Justice probe into campaign finance violations after a whistleblower came forward with accusations.
Gallego was revealed to have used campaign funds for various inappropriate and potentially illegal expenses, including luxury outings, family vacations to Disney World, child care, and Super Bowl tickets.
A source familiar with the Senator’s spending said he uses his campaign account as a “personal slush fund” in a statement to Politico. “He’s using campaign cash to live a luxury lifestyle,” they said.
Now, he’s under federal investigation, according to Axios.
Per Axios, the DOJ is investigating potential campaign finance violations based on a “whistleblower complaint” out of California.
The Arizona Senator has close ties to California Rep. Eric Swalwell, who resigned from Congress amid allegations of sexual assault. This makes the whistleblower’s California origin more intriguing.
One of the campaign finance expenditures Gallego came under fire for was his 2023 Super Bowl attendance at a so-called fundraiser with Swalwell.
Gallego and Swalwell reportedly hosted what was billed as a fundraising event for the Swallego Victory Fund during Super Bowl LVII at State Farm Stadium in Glendale. With tickets costing $5,000 and a $ 1,000-per-head “pre-game brunch” at The Henry in Phoenix’s affluent Arcadia neighborhood, the committee raised $56,505. However, the committee spent nearly $40,000 on the outing.
When asked about the Super Bowl last week, Gallego told The Gateway Pundit, “Well, I threw a fundraiser at the Super Bowl in my home state of Arizona. It was the start of a Senate campaign, and we needed to raise money,” further claiming, “We did everything by the book.”
Gallego went on to claim, “$10-15,000 is a lot when you’re running against an incumbent like Kyrsten Sinema.” Despite raising $63,777,612 during the 2024 election cycle, he doubled down, saying, “When you’re starting off, and you’re running as an underdog, $10-15,000 is a lot.”
The new investigation comes after the Senate Ethics Committee on Friday dismissed a complaint filed by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), alleging that Gallego engaged in “campaign finance violations and inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature.”
The six-member panel, headed by Chairman James Lankford (R-OK) and Vice Chairman Chris Coons (D-DE), “did not find evidence” that Gallego violated federal law or Senate rules.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Luna previously accused Gallego of being involved in disgraced ex-California Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell’s sexual escapades. Luna said in April that she had received “very disturbing” allegations about Gallego, claiming a woman wanted to “go on record about an incident that occurred between the two of them at the same time, and the event was sexual in nature, allegedly.”
Democrats just suffered a major setback in their plans to counter Republican redistricting gains before the 2028 elections.
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday that all five proposed redistricting ballot measures in the state — three led by Democrats and two led by Republicans — violated the state’s constitution, preventing either party from implementing new maps by undoing the independent commission that currently controls the process.
Colorado’s eight House seats are currently split evenly between both parties, and one of Democrats’ most ambitious redraw efforts would have created a map where seven of the districts favor the party.
Because Democrats would have needed a measure on the ballot this fall in order to redraw for 2028, the timing of the ruling makes it all but impossible to redraw.
The court issued two opinions on the redistricting measures Monday, and both were unanimous decisions against proposed remapping efforts.
Meanwhile, Republican-led states have successfully eliminated racially gerrymandered districts going into the midterm elections.
A transgender biological male former prostitute is running for mayor of Hamilton, Ontario, and if that wasn’t crazy enough, recent campaign footage shows him giving his speeches using a sock puppet with googly eyes.
“Scarlett Gillespie,” who previously went by the name “Jelena Vermilion,” currently serves as the executive director of the Sex Workers’ Action Program (SWAP) Hamilton and has long advocated for sex workers’ rights, housing issues, and trans-related causes.
Gillespie received the YWCA Hamilton Women of Distinction Award in 2024 for his work.
He announced his candidacy for mayor earlier this year and is registered for the municipal election scheduled for October 26.
Gillespie’s campaign platform focuses on affordable housing, tenant protections, climate justice, greater transparency at City Hall, community-led safety initiatives, and strengthening the local arts sector, according to his website.
The candidate has described himself as a “community organizer” and “activist with lived experience” working directly with “marginalized groups.”
In a video from a campaign event on Sunday, shared by Libs of TikTok, Gillespie is at a microphone with a sock puppet in one hand.
Gillespie uses the puppet to help deliver portions of his speech, including a story about feeling disrespected.
WATCH:
Meet Scarlett Gillespie, a candidate for mayor in Hamilton, Ontario
He pretends to be a woman and uses a sock puppet his speeches
“Meet Scarlett Gillespie, a candidate for mayor in Hamilton, Ontario. He pretends to be a woman and uses a sock puppet in his speeches. Canada is a circus,” Libs of TikTok wrote in the post with the video.
(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits Gateway Pundit. We appreciate your support!)
Right now, somewhere in a gleaming office park, a pharmaceutical executive is enjoying a very expensive meal – paid for, in part, by the money you spent on anti-inflammatories that don’t actually fix a single thing. They mask. They numb. They keep you coming back for refills like clockwork, because that’s not medicine – that’s a broken system.
Here’s what the establishment doesn’t want becoming common knowledge: your body already knows how to heal itself. The problem isn’t that your muscles, tendons, joints, and gut have forgotten how to repair – it’s that as you age, the molecular signals telling your cells to get to work go quiet. Scientists identified specific peptides – BPC-157, TB-500, KPV – that act like a bullhorn for your body’s own repair crews, and your biology already recognizes every one of them.
Until very recently, the only way to get these peptides into your system at a therapeutic level was with a syringe. Which meant most sensible, needle-averse people never got access to this technology at all. That just changed.
Just 30 drops in a small glass of cold water, first thing in the morning, and you’ve delivered injectable-grade peptides to a system that’s been waiting for exactly this signal.
This isn’t a workaround or a compromise. It’s a legitimate breakthrough available to you right now.
Let’s talk specifics, because you deserve them:
BPC-157 restores gut barrier integrity and dramatically accelerates the healing of muscles, tendons, and ligaments – working at the cellular level to repair actual tissue, not just quiet the pain signal.
TB-500 promotes cellular regeneration, builds flexibility, and encourages your body to grow new healthy tissue where damaged tissue has been sitting stagnant.
And KPV supports immune balance and helps your body mount a healthy inflammatory response instead of the chronic, low-grade inflammation that quietly destroys your quality of life year after year.
Maybe you’ve seen “miracle” supplements come and go – good, because healthy skepticism is a virtue. But peptides work fundamentally differently than the turmeric capsules and fish oil softgels gathering dust in your cabinet. They communicate directly with your cells, activating repair pathways that generic supplements can’t even reach – and The Wellness Company’s AQA delivery system is specifically engineered to protect these peptides from being degraded in your gut before they can do their job.
When did you last wake up without something hurting? When did you last finish a physical day without paying for it the next morning? If you’re like most people who’ve lived with any degree of grit, you’ve quietly accepted a version of your physical life that’s significantly diminished from what it once was.
The folks using REGENERATE are reporting something that sounds almost too good to be true – but isn’t. Shirley, a verified buyer, said her shoulder showed dramatic healing after just one week when nothing else had touched it. Bianka, who trains five days a week in bootcamps and endurance work, woke up on day five without the kinks and soreness she’d accepted as normal.
You haven’t heard about this before because peptide therapy was historically the domain of elite athletes and well-connected biohackers with access to compounding pharmacies – not regular Americans. The physicians who built The Wellness Company stood publicly against a medical consensus they knew was wrong when the stakes were highest, and they built this company on the premise that you deserve access to real medicine without bureaucratic interference. REGENERATE is that philosophy in a bottle.
The formula is clean – allergen free, vegan friendly, with exactly 1mg of each peptide per serving. Go to The Wellness Company right now, take it every morning for 30 days, and find out what your body is actually capable of when you give it the right signals – because you’ve worked too hard and sacrificed too much to spend the second half of your life waiting for a system that’s already failed you to finally get it right.
Note: The information provided on this website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications.
Man arrested for shooting a BB gun at naked bike riders in Los Angeles (screenshots via abc7)
A man was arrested on Saturday in Los Angeles after shooting participants in a naked bike riding event in Downtown Los Angeles.
The man reportedly faces assault with a deadly weapon (a BB gun) charges and other charges. Two victims reportedly suffered lacerations.
Some may call this man a hero, but according to the state of California, he’s a violent criminal.
The male suspect, dressed in all black, is seen being arrested by police after shooting the nude cyclists with a BB gun.
Via ABC 7:
Typically, the annual World Naked Bike Ride takes place during the mid-summer months, and participants ride through the streets naked to protest for cyclist safety and climate issues.
Two bike rides were held in Los Angeles at different times on Saturday. Each route ran nearly 10 miles across the city.
The clothes came off as the rubber hit the road at the World Naked Bike Ride in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, with hundreds of cyclists taking part in the body-baring cruise along city streets.
Staged out of the parking in Little Tokyo, the event transformed the area into a sea of skin of body paint, before riders set off on their eyebrow-raising routes.
Participants moved through the city in various states of undress, with body paint replacing biker shorts and police escorts directing traffic as the cyclists passed sidewalks packed with onlookers.
The event, which occupies a legal gray zone around public nudity, operates under guidelines that prohibit lewd or sexually explicit exposure. The ride is instead framed as a protest against car culture and an exercise in public expression.
This week’s Top Ten is direct from Washington DC for the first time ever – and showcases the most important stories off the week – the communist takeover of USA… the radical Muslim takeover of big cities… and the biggest problem in USA today – the disaster of Deep State communist insurrection judges.
Watch Wayne’s “America’s Top Ten Countdown” with his World-Famous “Final Four” airing every Saturday at NOON ET/9 AM PT on Real America’s Voice TV Network. Also, watch Wayne’s new nightly show, “America Speaks”- now LIVE at 6 PM ET/3 PM Pacific on Real America’s Voice YOUTUBE channel and replayed on Real America’s Voice TV at Midnight ET/9 PM Pacific. Call-in and speak to Wayne at (800) 347-ROOT. Also, watch Wayne’s new daily podcast, “WAR ZONE LIVE Presented by The Gateway Pundit” with a new time! Weeknights at 4 pm ET/1 PM Pacific at TheGatewayPundit.com.
.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
delivery technology.
