Ilhan Omar’s Father, Nur Omar Mohamed, and Somalia’s Genocide

Military service in Siad Barre’s army did not automatically invalidate Nur Omar Mohamed’s refugee status in the United States. However, proven complicity in crimes against humanity or deliberate misrepresentation of material facts on his immigration forms could raise legal questions about his admission.

Federal agents searched Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington-area home on Monday. The Justice Department said Homeland Security Investigations agents executed a judicially authorized search warrant, adding that “this enforcement action is part of an ongoing federal criminal investigation.”

Sources told Fox News Digital the probe centers on immigration paperwork completed by Omar’s late father, Nur Omar Mohamed, who served for more than two decades as an officer in Somali dictator Siad Barre’s army.

In March 2026, Vice President JD Vance said he believed Omar had committed immigration fraud. Omar has denied the accusations, and her chief of staff, Connor McNutt, called the claim a “ridiculous lie.”

Mohamed was born in Bandarbeyla, a coastal town in northeastern Somalia, and grew up in Mogadishu, according to his 2020 Sahan Journal obituary. A former army comrade who had known him since the early 1970s said he joined the Somali National Army after military training in Russia and rose to colonel. During the 1977–1978 war with Ethiopia, he commanded a regiment and was recognized for his service.

He may have served under a different name. A former Somali army general told the Daily Mail in December 2025 that Nur used the name Nur Said and enlisted in 1966. Snopes reported some evidence supporting claims that his full name was Nur Said Mohamed Elmi. In March 2026, Somaliland’s government identified him as Nur Said Elmi and said the family used multiple names in different countries.

Former generals who served alongside Nur described his career to the Daily Mail anonymously, citing fear of reprisals. Their accounts included training in Egypt, service in air defense and infantry units, postings in Mogadishu and Garbahaarrey, and a transfer to Hargeisa in 1984. Garbahaarrey was Barre’s southwestern hometown and a military hub; Hargeisa was the north’s main city.

Mohamed Haji Ingiriis, a historian and Oxford University doctoral researcher, told the New York Post that Nur served under the name Nur Said and remained loyal to Barre’s regime until its collapse. Yusuf Ismail Faraton, who served with Nur and later moved to Minneapolis, told the Post that Nur led multiple brigades and commanded a regiment.

The army Nur served was Marxist and aligned with Moscow until November 1977, when Barre expelled all Soviet advisers, according to a declassified CIA analysis. Nur belonged to the Majerteen clan. After Majerteen officers attempted a coup in April 1978, the regime retaliated against the clan with extrajudicial executions, rape, livestock killings, and destruction of water reservoirs, according to a Canadian government paper citing Africa Watch. Nur remained in the army.

Hargeisa, where the Daily Mail’s source and Ingiriis placed him, became the center of the regime’s campaign against the Isaaq clan. When rebels took the city in 1988, the army bombarded it with artillery and aircraft and attacked survivors fleeing toward Ethiopia from the air, according to an Amnesty International report cited by Canadian authorities. The State Department’s 1989 human rights report found that about 90 percent of Isaaq homes, businesses, and property in Hargeisa were destroyed or severely damaged.

Robert Gersony’s State Department-commissioned study, Why Somalis Flee, conservatively estimated that Somali forces deliberately murdered at least 5,000 unarmed Isaaq civilians between May 1988 and March 1989. At least 500 Isaaq men were rounded up in Berbera, killed mainly by having their throats cut, and buried in mass graves.

The Gersony report also estimated that 300,000 to 500,000 Somali refugees, mainly Isaaqs, arrived in Ethiopia between May 1988 and January 1989.

No document ties Nur Omar Mohamed to specific crimes. The Daily Mail reported that archival footage uncovered by Somaliland academic Hussein Bulhan shows Barre’s senior commanders discussing the destruction of northern towns. One officer reportedly resembles Nur, but the paper did not identify him as that officer and stated there was no conclusive proof he personally ordered or committed atrocities. Somaliland’s government has accused him of participating in the Isaaq Genocide.

After Barre’s fall in January 1991, Darod civilians became targets. United Somali Congress militias that took Mogadishu carried out large-scale violence against Darod clans, according to historian Lidwien Kapteijns’ Clan Cleansing in Somalia, as summarized in Project MUSE. Nur’s Majerteen clan is part of the Darod.

According to the Daily Mail’s source, Nur was then running a military school in Baidoa. Ingiriis told the Post that Nur ran the Daynuunaay military school. The family fled to Kismayo and crossed into Kenya months later, spending four years in the Utange refugee camp. No source describes Nur’s activities during those years.

The family entered the United States as refugees in 1995. After two years in Arlington, Virginia, they settled in Minneapolis’s Cedar-Riverside neighborhood. Nur worked as a cab driver and postal worker. His obituary says he later helped rebuild security forces in Puntland, an autonomous state in northeastern Somalia. He died of COVID-19 complications at Hennepin County Medical Center in June 2020, aged 67.

In her 2020 memoir, Omar describes her father as “an educator.”

Nur’s refugee status placed him in the same legal category as civilians who fled the army he served.

Under U.S. law, an applicant’s own persecution does not offset earlier participation in persecuting others. The persecutor bar turns on whether the applicant ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in persecution. The Supreme Court examined its scope in Negusie v. Holder in 2009. Whether Nur disclosed his military career, and how U.S. officials weighed it, is not public.

The post Ilhan Omar’s Father, Nur Omar Mohamed, and Somalia’s Genocide appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

“Jane Doe Strikes Again!” – Matt Gaetz Responds to New Sex Trafficking Lawsuit From Anonymous Accusers

Matt Gaetz

Former Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz is being accused again of sex trafficking by two anonymous women who filed a lawsuit against him and two others in federal court on Thursday. 

This follows past accusations of sex trafficking, which were weaponized by RINOs in the House of Representatives, despite the Department of Justice declining to prosecute.

It can be recalled that a House Ethics Committee investigation was reopened back in 2023 as Gaetz ramped up challenges to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who was later ousted by Gaetz’s Motion to Vacate the chair. When Gaetz threatened to bring the Motion to Vacate against McCarthy in October 2023, McCarthy’s RINO allies began threatening to expel Gaetz based on the committee’s investigation.

The committee’s revival of the junk allegations against Gaetz notably came after the Biden DOJ exonerated Gaetz of criminal wrongdoing and dropped all charges in February 2023.

Gaetz resigned from Congress in November 2024 after Trump announced his nomination for Attorney General of the United States. In an attempt to thwart his Senate confirmation and despite no longer having jurisdiction over Gaetz as a private citizen, the committee later released a report alleging that Gaetz made tens of thousands of dollars in payments to women for sex while he was a member of Congress.

Now, a couple of anonymous accusers under the alias “Jane Doe 1” and “Jane Doe 2” are using the Ethics Committee’s report to dredge up new claims of exploitation in a civil lawsuit nearly two years later.

The complaint also relies heavily on discredited Ethics Committee star witness Joel Greenberg, who previously admitted to working with Democrat prosecutors to take down Republican politicians and that he fabricated allegations of sex trafficking against Gaetz.

Per MS Now:

The women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, are accusing Gaetz, former Florida state Rep. Chris Dorworth and Joel Greenberg, a former tax collector in Florida’s Seminole County, of “recruitment and sexual exploitation” from 2017 through January 2019 — while Gaetz was a sitting member of Congress. The lawsuit relies in part on a House Ethics Committee report that concluded Gaetz paid roughly a dozen women for sex between 2017 and 2020.

The plaintiffs’ complaint also draws from Greenberg’s plea agreement, in which he acknowledged engaging in commercial sex acts with the minor described in the complaint as “Victim A” and “introduc[ing] the Minor to other adult men, who engaged in commercial sex acts with the Minor in the Middle District of Florida.” Greenberg is serving an 11-year federal prison sentence in Florida on sex trafficking and fraud convictions.

The accusers allege Gaetz and Greenberg “coordinated the recruitment, payments, drugs, and travel to obtain commercial sexual acts from young women,” and accuse Dorworth of “knowingly” participating.

The 38-page complaint, filed in the Middle District Court of Florida, describes the defendants as “men of power, wealth, and privilege who used their positions not to protect the vulnerable but to prey upon them.” The complaint states that one of the women was 20 years old when she met Gaetz, now 44, and that the other was 22 when she first met Greenberg, now 42.

“I look forward to taking the plaintiffs’ depositions because much of the conduct alleged against me is false,” Gaetz said in response to the lawsuit, according to the Miami Herald.

“The lawsuit relies almost exclusively on a Congressional Committee report that didn’t allow me to confront my accusers. Now I will finally have that chance.”

Gaetz later responded in an X post, writing, “Jane Doe Strikes Again!”

“Two adult women sued me today alleging they were sex trafficked to the Bahamas. I’m shocked nobody responded to their repeated cries for help, posted to instagram,” he said, sharing a screenshot of one of the alleged victims’ Instagram posts from the Bahamas back in September 2018.

“#Bahamas #beers and #babes are all you need,” the woman wrote in her post.

The post “Jane Doe Strikes Again!” – Matt Gaetz Responds to New Sex Trafficking Lawsuit From Anonymous Accusers appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Watch Live: DOJ Gives California 48 Hours to Check Noncitizen Names on Voter Rolls or Face Emergency Action Before Midterms and More! The WAR Zone Podcast With Wayne Allyn Root Presented by The Gateway Pundit

CLICK HERE TO WATCH RIGHT NOW!

The Most Exciting, Intense, High-Energy MAGA/America First Podcast in the USA!

1 Hour Daily, Monday-Friday, 4:30 to 5:30 PM Eastern, 1:30 to 2:30 PM Pacific

The post Watch Live: DOJ Gives California 48 Hours to Check Noncitizen Names on Voter Rolls or Face Emergency Action Before Midterms and More! The WAR Zone Podcast With Wayne Allyn Root Presented by The Gateway Pundit appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

High School Football Coach Fired, Allegedly for Running Up Score Against Lesser Opponent

A Roman Catholic high school in Oregon is taking issue with the foundational football maxim of legendary coach Vince Lombardi that “winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing.”

After winning a 63-0 game against Cottage Grove, Marist Catholic High School announced that it had removed Zach Loboy as head football coach, according to KVAL-TV.

The lopsided score reflected only the first half because the game was called at halftime.

Marist tried two onside kicks as it kept up the pressure and racked up more and more points.

The first half included at least two onside kicks from the Spartans.

As noted on X, one of the onside kicks came with Marist leading 57-0.

The school did not offer an official explanation, but Mid-Major Media posted on X that the game was a factor.

“It is believed that the reason Loboy was let go was due to Marist Catholic running up the score to 64-0 in the first half versus Cottage Grove, going against the school’s code of conduct,” the post said.

A report in The Athletic said Marist athletic director Rick Gardner, Cottage Grove athletic director Garrett Bridgens, and Lane County Football Association commissioner Mike Whitty all agreed to end the game.

“It wasn’t a forfeit; it wasn’t that our coaches and players did not want to continue,” Bridgens said. “We were working in the best interest of our kids, our fans — the entire situation — to do what was best for everyone. This was the ADs and the commissioner of officials working together to make that decision.”

Gardner said Loboy’s conduct in the game “is really not reflective of the school’s mission and how we want to treat our opponents.”

“Our athletic program tries to adhere to the mission and the values of Marist Catholic High School,” he said. “In this particular case, we definitely fell short.”

Marist Catholic Principal Bob Fraley wrote to parents and guardians to explain the decision.

“I am writing to inform you that Marist has made the decision to remove Zach Loboy from his position as Head Varsity Football Coach, effective immediately. Following Friday’s game against Cottage Grove, we determined that a change in leadership was necessary to reflect our school’s mission and values,” the letter said.

“For the remainder of the season, Jake Lowther will serve as interim Head Football Coach. Jake joined our football staff this year after previously serving as a Varsity Assistant Coach at Cascade High School,” the letter said.

“We are confident that Jake will provide the leadership and guidance our student-athletes need. Our priority is to support our players, maintain a positive team environment, and help the team finish the season strong,” the letter continued.

“We recognize that a coaching change in the middle of a season can be difficult for players and families.”

Cottage Grove is 1-5 on the season, with a combined score of 206-36 in losing its last five games, according to the New York Post.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post High School Football Coach Fired, Allegedly for Running Up Score Against Lesser Opponent appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Why Banks Are Suddenly Competing to Pause Your 21% Interest Into 2028

(Note: The information provided here or in any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice. Gateway Pundit benefits from purchases made through our sponsors. We appreciate your support!)

The payment goes out every month, and interest takes its bite before the balance moves. On a fixed income, that bite hurts.

Most people over 55 with good credit were never told why that bite keeps happening. It is not because there is no other option.

It is because talking about it is not in the bank’s interest.

A person over 55 who kept the accounts clean is exactly who card issuers want. Good to excellent credit in that age group is the strongest of any age. That is the customer the other side fights to win.

So they built a feature to win that customer: a 0% introductory rate on a balance transfer, often 15 to 21 months, with the best offers running into 2027 and nearly 2028. It’s not a loophole. It’s not a gimmick.

The banks will compete for your credit.

Most people simply never make them do it.

They stay on the card that is already charging above 21%, and the bank keeps the gap.

Here is what a balance transfer means in plain English: You apply for a card that offers 0% intro APR on balances moved over. Once approved, you move the old balance for a one-time fee, usually 3% to 5% of the amount.

For the length of the intro window, every dollar of the payment goes to the balance itself, not to interest. That’s how you stop the hurt.

A rough example: about $6,800 at 21% is about $1,400 a year going to the bank before the principal shrinks. Pause that interest for 15 to 21 months, keep the same payment, and thousands stay with you. Numbers differ by balance and rate; the bigger the balance and the higher the rate, the more the pause is worth.

These cards are for people with good to excellent credit who will use the window to pay the balance down. They are not a fit for people with serious recent credit damage, or if the plan is to run up new debt on the freed-up card.

Offers change. Intro lengths, fees, and end dates move. The comparison page here is updated with today’s leading 0% balance-transfer cards.

On the next page are the card names, the length of each 0% period, the transfer fees, and a secure application for each. Comparing takes about two minutes.

Click here to see today’s top 0% balance transfer cards.

The post Why Banks Are Suddenly Competing to Pause Your 21% Interest Into 2028 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Bitter Loser Hillary Clinton: If I Could Change One Thing about My Career, I Would Have Won the Electoral College in 2016 (VIDEO)

Twice-failed presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton visited Omaha, Nebraska, to attend a Democrat party fundraiser dubbed “Pumpkins, Pies and Politics.”

“Everything that we could hope for in the lead-up to the next election is really happening. … We just have to stay focused and on task and turn out the vote and celebrate when we take back the House and the Senate,” Hillary Clinton said to cheers.

Hillary trashed Trump ahead of the midterm elections and said his popularity is wearing off.

“I think what originally seemed like, ‘Oh, he’s a different kind of leader. He says what he thinks, ’all of that, I think that it’s beginning to finally sink through to people, like, ‘Wait a minute, am I better off? Has my life improved?’” Clinton said.

“I look at other people, especially those who are doing really, really well. And they seem to be enjoying a lot of access to the president, and even the president has made a lot of money,” she said.

Clinton was asked what she would change about her career.

“If you could do it all over, what would you do differently?” an audience member asked Hillary Clinton.

“I would’ve not just won the popular vote but the electoral college,” Clinton said of her crushing 2016 loss to Trump.

WATCH:

Since her humiliating loss to Trump in 2016, Hillary Clinton has repeatedly called for the abolition of the Electoral College.

“I believe we should abolish the Electoral College and select our president by the winner of the popular vote, same as every other office,” Hillary said on X in 2020.

“But while it still exists, I was proud to cast my vote in New York for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris,” she said.

Abolishing the Electoral College requires a Constitutional Amendment.

The post Bitter Loser Hillary Clinton: If I Could Change One Thing about My Career, I Would Have Won the Electoral College in 2016 (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

More Questions Than Answers: Maricopa County Supervisor Releases “Explanation” of Controversial Late-Night Election Video

 

On October 10, The Gateway Pundit published an article that revealed concerning video allegedly showing two election workers, one carrying a toddler, entering the Ballot Tabulation Center (BTC)M after hours and inserting a device into one of the adjudication terminals.

Days prior, the Logic & Accuracy (L&A) testing had already been completed.  The terminals reportedly had “port blockers” installed over the USB ports in order to ensure no foreign devices were inserted into the systems following the completion of the L&A testing.

On October 14, Maricopa County published via X a “Joint Statement Addressing Election Misinformation” from the Board of Supervisors Chair Kate Brophy McGee and Vice Chair Debbie Lesko. 

The statement described the work as “authorized and necessary work to update software and upload election data to a computer terminal” that is air-gapped and did not involve the Election Management System or tabulators.

The update required a USB drive “to load authorized election files onto the duplication terminal,” according to the statement.  It also claims that, “The entire process is subject to rigorous audits during and after every election.”

Following the joint statement from the Chair and Vice Chair, Supervisor Mark Stewart posted a video to X with “Eric,” the Chair of the Libertarian Party and “Michelle,” who is described as “a friend” of Stewart’s from the Republican Party.

Following a “tour” and “an understanding of what happened here the other day,” Stewart deferred to the Eric and Michelle to explain:

Eric describes the problem with Runbeck’s Novus System (ballot duplication software) as follows:

“When Runbeck provided the election title name for this file, it contained a backslash in it.  A backslash generally indicates a folder structure on a Windows machine, and so that character caused a bug on the export when the ballot duplication had finished.  By removing the backslash, the export could run.  Essentially, what we saw on the evening video was them trying to troubleshoot and figure out that backslash problem.

What this kind of points to to me is that Runbeck needs better software Q&A because that backslash should not be an allowable character in that particular field.

The Elections Department is essentially writing guidance to tell people not to use special characters, which dodges the issue.  But that was the full finding from today’s tour.”

This explanation is bizarre.  If a Windows-based system user tries to use a backslash ( ) when saving a document on any Windows application, they most likely will be prompted with an “error” message that the backslash character is not recognized.  How this somehow made its way into Runbeck’s software is a competency question that needs to be answered.

But more concerning was the explanation from Michelle, the friend from the Republican Party.  She stated:

“The backslash and the export process was in the process of generating the pdf file that is used to actually print the replacement ballots and I think that that piece of that is important.

The system they were working on is the duplication system. The duplication system is on an air-gapped network so its separate from everything else in the room. That’s by design. It’s not part of the logic and accuracy testing as prescribed by law and by the election procedures manual, the EPM.

It’s not part of it because its not part of the Election Management System, its not part of the tabulation system.

It’s something that happens outside of it which could happen manually bubbling in to replace a damaged ballot or formats of ballots like braille and others that cannot be read by the tabulation system.

Once the ballots are generated from the input from the system and the exported pdf file, that’s what actually goes through the rest of the system that has been already certified as well as the logic and accuracy testing.

 

The assertion that the duplication system is not subject to Logic & Accuracy (L&A) testing “as prescribed by … the election procedure manual (EPM)” appears to be misinformed.  The EPM actually states that damaged/defective ballots “must be manually duplicated by a Ballot Duplication Board.”  It does not authorize electronic software to adjudicate or duplicate damaged or defective ballots.

Image

 

The EPM does later state that “an alternative” to “manual duplication of ballots … by the Ballot Duplication Board” can be performed by an Electronic Vote Adjudication Board appointed by the Board of Supervisors and that they must “utilize a certified electronic adjudication program” in doing so.

Image

Further, the EPM also states that “If electronic adjudication of votes … will be utilized … that functionality shall also be tested during the L&A test to ensure secure and proper functioning.”

Image

 

In another section of the EPM for “Conducting the L&A Test,” it states that, “If the county intends to use the electronic adjudication or electronic write-in tallying functionality in the upcoming election, that functionality must also be tested during the Secretary of State’s L&A test.”

Image

 

One position Maricopa County could potentially take is that the Novus duplication software is entirely separate from the electronic-adjudication functionality and therefore not subject to the testing and certification.

If that is the case and the distinction is drawn, then the EPM appears to preclude the usage of electronic duplication software as it states damaged/defective ballots “must manually be duplicated by a Ballot Duplication Board,” not by untested, uncertified software.

At the very least, Maricopa County should clarify the authority in which an untested, stand-alone duplication system could be used to replace the manual duplication process.

The Gateway Pundit has reached out to Supervisor Mark Stewart for comment regarding the video as well as Vice Chair Debbie Lesko for more information regarding the authorization records related to this update.  The Gateway Pundit will update this article accordingly.

 

 

The post More Questions Than Answers: Maricopa County Supervisor Releases “Explanation” of Controversial Late-Night Election Video appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Weaponized Lawfare: An Army Colonel’s Defamation Suit Raises Questions on Patriotism, Free Speech, and Freedom of the Press

Image: AI-Generated Image by J.M. Phelps

Legal retaliation over comments is raising critical questions about the intersection of patriotism, free expression, and legal accountability.

According to a report by the Washington Examiner, on October 10, the Oversight Project successfully transferred a defamation lawsuit filed by Army Colonel Junel Jeffrey against retired Army Major Dr. Charles “Chase” Spears from the D.C. Superior Court to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

This move changes the presiding judges to Article III federal judges, allowing Spears a more accessible route to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.

The lawsuit arises from public comments made by retired U.S. Army public affairs officer Dr. Spears in September 2025, concerning a social media post attributed to Col. Jeffrey, a senior U.S. Army public affairs officer stationed at the Pentagon.

Following the assassination of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, Col. Jeffrey posted remarks on social media that included a reaction to Kirk’s murder, which Spears highlighted as a troubling instance of ideological extremism within the Armed Forces.

“Sometimes we reap what we sow,” read the post from a social media account featuring Jeffrey’s name and image.

 

Spears not only claimed that Col. Jeffrey was “the only one brazen enough” to publicly celebrate Kirk’s assassination, noting that she represents a significant segment of her colleagues, but he also penned an opinion article for RedState to express his concern.

“We failed to defeat Al Qaeda over the course of two decades,” he wrote. “Worse still, we allowed the American left wing to import that foreign terrorist association’s agenda, tactics, and desired end state: violent destruction of those marked as ‘infidels.’ Then we gave these neo-Qaeda agents safe harbor in the ranks of our military.”

The Oversight Project is now representing Spears in this case against him for these comments and more, marking a significant expansion of its legal efforts to defend individuals perceived as patriotic allies facing lawfare. The organization aims to combat the weaponization of legal systems against conservatives exercising their constitutional rights.

In a recent press release, President Mike Howell expressed outrage over the celebrations surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination, stating, “It speaks to a deep sickness our country needs to get a handle on. The act of noticing this evil is not defamation. The Oversight Project isn’t going to sit back and watch patriotic Americans be targets of lawfare any longer.”

Jeff Clark, the group’s vice president for litigation, also condemned Col. Jeffrey’s actions, describing them as “appalling” and “deeply disturbing.” He asserted that Col. Jeffrey’s defamation lawsuit against Spears in the amount of tens of millions of dollars exemplifies “weaponized lawfare.”

The Oversight Project’s legal battle on behalf of Spears is emblematic of a larger fight against the misuse of the judicial system to silence and intimidate those who speak out against extremist views. As the case progresses in the federal court, it not only seeks justice for Spears but also serves as a rallying point for others who face similar challenges.

The post Weaponized Lawfare: An Army Colonel’s Defamation Suit Raises Questions on Patriotism, Free Speech, and Freedom of the Press appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

JUST IN: FBI Agents Fired Over Their Roles For Targeting Trump in Classified Documents Case Sue to Get Their Jobs Back

The nine former FBI agents fired for their roles in Jack Smith’s classified documents case are suing the FBI and Director Kash Patel for their jobs back.

The disgruntled agents said they were fired without cause.

FBI Director Kash Patel fired the agents in February 2026.

The former agents argued that they never volunteered to work on the “Plasmic Echo” case, but rather were assigned to it because of their roles in counterintelligence.

NBC News reported:

Nine former FBI employees involved in the classified documents case against President Donald Trump filed suit Thursday against FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Todd Blanche, alleging their firings were “unlawful.”

The group’s suit says they were fired without cause for their work on the case involving Trump, and that the firings appeared to be politically motivated. It noted they were booted while FBI Patel was being criticized by the administration for partying with the U.S. Olympic hockey team.

FBI Special Agent Miles Starr, who was working in a unit called the “Director’s Advisory Team” that was apparently formed to look into Trump’s perceived political enemies, had demanded urgent access to the “Plasmic Echo” case file — the code name for the investigation into the classified documents case — on Feb. 23, the lawsuit says.

That was after video of Patel chugging a beer and “flinging alcohol around the U.S. men’s hockey team’s locker room at the Winter Olympics in Milan, Italy, began circulating widely on social media and news sites,” the suit says.

The file had the names of the agents who’d worked on the investigation, and they were summarily fired over the next few days without any of the required due process, the suit says.

“Each Plaintiff was provided with a termination letter signed by Director Patel” that falsely claimed that they had exercised “poor judgment and a lack of impartiality in carrying out their duties, leading to the political weaponization of the government,” the suit says.

Skip to PDF content

The post JUST IN: FBI Agents Fired Over Their Roles For Targeting Trump in Classified Documents Case Sue to Get Their Jobs Back appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

(VIDEO) Election Denier Kamala Harris in South Korea Says Democrats Are Going to Win Despite Republicans’ “Overt Cheating”

Kamala Harris speaks at an Asan Institute for Policy Studies lecture in Seoul, South Korea

Kamala Harris was in South Korea this week talking about the upcoming US election, which she accused Republicans of cheating in, but said Democrats are going to win.

Harris appeared at an Asan Institute for Policy Studies lecture in Seoul, South Korea, fueling speculation about her plans for 2024.

Per the Washington Times:

Ms. Harris, the 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, was in South Korea at the invitation of the Asan Institute, a prominent Seoul think tank, to deliver its annual memorial lecture.

The lecture cut a broad swath, linking geopolitics and U.S. alliances to the race for primacy in global tech and the import of secure supply chains.

Given the timing — less than three weeks ahead of the midterms — and the support Ms. Harris has for another presidential bid, Asan got a hot speaker.

She currently leads a crowded field of potential candidates for her party’s 2028 nomination. An Oct. 11 Focaldata/Financial Times survey found 30% of Democrats back her — double the numbers of runner-up Gavin Newsom, governor of California, with 15%.

Notably, she used the appearance to push what Democrats have long considered a conspiracy theory: cheating in elections. Harris has adopted the narrative that Republicans are rigging the elections with attempts to pass voter ID measures, removing inactive and illegal voters, or “purging” the voter rolls, and redistricting in red states.

She has even started using Trump’s signature catchphrase, “Too big to rig.”

“There have been overt attempts to deny fair and free elections, as we all know,” she said during her Wednesday appearance at the panel in Seoul. She ironically went on to deny the fairness of the upcoming election.

“In the United States, there’s been overt cheating happening around the elections process, whether it be the purging of the voter rolls or Redrawing districts outside of the season when that would happen.”

“So I say all that to say that we are facing a lot of obstacles, but the Democrats are going to win,” she continued.

WATCH:

Meanwhile, the left-wing media is trying to corner Trump and get him to say he’ll accept the election results.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Trump was asked last week by a reporter if he’ll accept the results “no matter what party wins,” and he responded, “What do you think? Of course I will, but we don’t want cheating. We don’t want cheating in the midterms.”

“We don’t want cheating. Do you understand me?” he added.

(VIDEO) Trump Blasts Reporter Asking if He’ll Accept Midterm Results – “What Do You Think?”

The post (VIDEO) Election Denier Kamala Harris in South Korea Says Democrats Are Going to Win Despite Republicans’ “Overt Cheating” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.