(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and working with them through the links below which benefits Gateway Pundit. We appreciate your support!)
The big banks don’t want you to know this — but you can stop paying them interest right now.
A North Texas mother of two is behind bars on Tuesday morning after police say she turned a knife on her husband and her own young children in the dark, hours before sunrise.
Northlake police were dispatched at about 4:20 a.m. Tuesday to a home in the 1200 block of Daylily Drive, in the Canyon Falls area east of I-35W, after a man called 911 and reported that his wife had a knife and had stabbed him, according to NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth.
Officers were on scene within minutes and detained 37-year-old Holly Leeann Flores.
What they found inside the house was worse.
A 34-year-old man, the caller, identified by police and local outlets as Flores’s husband, had been stabbed in the head.
A 3-year-old girl and a 10-month-old boy were found with stab wounds to the chest. All three were rushed to a Fort Worth hospital.
NBC 5 reported that police believe Flores is the mother of the two children. The same outlet said investigators could not immediately confirm whether the injured man is the children’s father.
Northlake Police Chief Robert Crawford said he believed the children would survive their injuries, NBC 5 reported. No formal condition update had been released as of Tuesday morning. Motive has not been disclosed.
Flores was also hurt. She was taken to a Denton hospital for observation, treated and released, then booked into the Denton County Jail. Preliminary charges: two counts of attempted capital murder and one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, according to FOX 4 Dallas-Fort Worth.
This was not the first time police had been to that address. Chief Crawford told NBC 5 officers had been called to the home about five times since March, mostly for welfare concerns.
He said the calls came from the residence itself, not from neighbors. He did not elaborate.
The Northlake attack lands in the middle of a grim run of Texas cases in which authorities say a parent turned on their own children.
The Gateway Pundit reported last week that 42-year-old Colleen Nichole Lemmon was charged with two counts of capital murder after Ellis County deputies say she shot and killed both of her sons — ages 21 and 15 — inside their Waxahachie home in the pre-dawn hours of October 1.
Deputies were dispatched at about 4:13 a.m. The older son was pronounced dead at the scene. The 15-year-old died at the hospital. Lemmon was booked on a $2.5 million bond.
Days earlier, The Gateway Pundit reported on a west Houston case in which police say a mother shot and killed her 4-year-old daughter inside a Memorial-area townhome after a custody hearing, then shot herself in the face. The child was found dead. The mother was expected to survive.
RINO Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) appears on ABC’s “The View”
Outgoing RINO Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) apparently wants President Donald Trump to know that the phone-number game can go both ways.
During an appearance Monday on ABC’s far-left daytime program “The View,” Tillis delivered what sounded like a thinly veiled warning to President Trump after the hosts brought up Trump’s decision to publicly post Senator Tom Cotton’s phone number over the weekend.
Co-host Sunny Hostin said, “Last year, you announced you’re retiring from the Senate after this term, following a very public fallout with the president over his Big Beautiful Bill. In the book, you include some private exchanges with the president after he called you a ‘loser’ and took credit for forcing you out of the Senate, actually. You claim to have written him, denying his account and saying, ‘I would have immediately told you to go blank yourself’ and ‘I don’t take this B.S. from anyone, including you, Mr. President.’ Did you hear back from him?”
Tillis said, “Actually, we’ve talked or texted back and forth several times since then.”
Co-host Ana Navarro said, “He’s gonna give your phone away after this.”
Tillis said, “With all due respect, I have his number, too.”
Hostin said, “Earlier we talked about the president supposedly giving out the cell number of Senator Tom Cotton, so you should be concerned about your phone number, in a dispute over policy. Are you concerned about the president coming after you after he has someone read this book to him?”
Tillis said, “Not at all. Look, we could dedicate a whole show to me, the book ends of overreach and vindictive prosecutions, etc. For people to forget about their party’s overreach puts that party in peril in the next election. That’s my whole point. Most of the people in this country live between the 35 yard lines in politics. And the party that figures that out first is going to have a structural majority because the rest of us are tired of the garbage.”
WATCH:
Retiring RINO Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) took his war on President Donald Trump to the friendliest possible audience on Monday, the ladies of ABC’s “The View”, and answered a joke about getting his phone number posted with a threat of his own.
“With all due respect, I got his number too,” Tillis told the panel.
https://t.co/zYwFwv8VAY
The North Carolina senator was on the show to hawk How to Lose Friends and Antagonize Presidents, the memoir The Gateway Pundit reported on last week after Tillis handed screenshots of profanity-laced texts to the press.
In one May 22 message he wrote, “I don’t take this bull**** from anyone, including you Mr. President.” In a June 6 text he bragged that if Trump had ever threatened him with a primary, “I would have immediately told you to f*** yourself.”
He never actually said it to the president’s face. He is saying the version that sells books, on a daytime panel that has spent years calling Trump a threat to democracy.
President Trump announces new shipyard at Tradepoint Atlantic in Sparrows Point, Maryland – October 6, 2026 (Photo by Jordan Conradson/TGP)
President Trump will deliver a speech at Anduril Industries’ Tradepoint Atlantic facility in Sparrows Point, Maryland, this afternoon as the autonomous military technology company unveils plans to build a new shipyard near Baltimore.
Anduril Industries CEO Brian Schimpf delivered remarks before Trump and announced the new shipyard and plans to work with the Naval Academy in Annapolis.
The Gateway Pundit is on the ground covering Trump’s speech.
Here at Tradepoint Atlantic in Sparrows Point, MD where President Trump is set to speak to Navy midshipmen and officers as Anduril Industries announces plans to build a new shipyard for autonomous undersea vehicles
The Seabed Sentry in particular is described as “an AI-enabled sensor that brings connectivity and awareness to the deep dark sea.”
Trump’s visit will come on the heels of news that the U.S. Army plans to establish a new autonomous systems command to support the development of autonomous technologies in warfare, including watercraft, Axios reported.
“The Army is rapidly advancing to maintain our lethal edge,” acting service Secretary Adam Telle told Axios. “This is about combat readiness to destroy the enemy and ensure our Army never enters a fair fight.”
“We are incorporating boat and autonomous systems into our team and accelerate pace and escape,” Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao said while speaking before Trump. “You can ask the Iranians.”
Upon arriving in Maryland, Trump flew over the crowd of Navy midshipmen and officers on Marine One.
WATCH:
Thriller plays as Trump flies over Anduril Industries’ Tradepoint Atlantic facility in Sparrows Point, Maryland, on Marine One pic.twitter.com/VvNnkWzqc6
A dead lab worker. Nearly 200 people are under observation. And questions about whether plague escaped a Russian laboratory. Reports of a possible spill in Siberia are raising alarms, but neither the spill nor pneumonic plague has been confirmed. Russian authorities deny a laboratory accident. I fear it could be something far worse than pneumonic plague!
And with the midterms weeks away, you know what I’m thinking: We watched politicians use COVID to expand their power and change election rules. Could another health scare become another political weapon? In my view, that question deserves scrutiny.
Today on Stinchfield: What happened inside that lab? Why is Russia taking unprecedented actions? And what would tell us that the danger has crossed a border? We break down the unanswered questions with Dr. Peter McCullough. He explains why it’s time to shut down Bio-Labs worldwide.
British Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has made an extraordinary admission about Britain’s Channel migration system, saying “you can almost guarantee that every woman” waiting in northern France has “probably been raped along the journey,” according to reports from the British press.
Mahmood then delivered the line that will reverberate through Britain’s immigration debate: “We’re not in control of this border.” The Home Secretary admitted that criminal trafficking organizations effectively determine which migrants reach northern France and ultimately board dinghies for Britain.
“The sifting of the people that end up in the north of France and are about to get on a dinghy is done by criminal gangs who are also, by the way, people traffickers,” she said. Mahmood added that male migrants are also subjected to abuse, intimidation and threats along the journey.
Her description presents a brutal contradiction at the heart of the Channel system: Britain says it controls immigration, yet organized smugglers can still decide who boards boats and reaches British waters. For immigration restrictionists and sovereigntists, Mahmood’s own language amounts to unusually direct confirmation of their argument that border sovereignty remains compromised.
Mahmood herself argued that such a system cannot determine who eventually settles in Britain. “That is not the model that should decide whether somebody gets to come to the UK, make this their place of sanctuary and ultimately become one of us,” she said.
Her comments came as another large migrant boat reached British waters off Hampshire, bringing the border crisis to Gosport rather than the usual landing points farther east. French rescue vessels shadowed the dinghy before two RNLI boats met it in British waters and brought 149 migrants ashore.
The Home Office confirmed that those aboard would be transported to Kent for processing and undergo health, biometric and security checks. Government officials said contingency arrangements had been activated so the arrivals could be “securely disembarked, checked and processed.”
Massive police operation in Gosport, UK last night after the authorities brought in another 150 illegal migrants who arrived on dinghies
4 buses transported the migrants from the boats to their hotels while police forces held protesters back from the area https://t.co/jhbOMfEyVa
The arrival triggered a large anti-migration demonstration near Haslar Marina, where roughly 350 people gathered as the operation unfolded. Police later arrested 12 people on suspicion of offences including assaulting an officer, criminal damage and drunken disorder.
Protesters shouted against the arrival while flares and scuffles broke out, although police said much of the gathering remained peaceful. The scenes illustrated how illegal Channel crossings have moved beyond Westminster statistics and become a combustible public-order issue in coastal communities.
The core sovereigntist argument remains that a functioning state must decide who enters its territory rather than allowing that decision to emerge from a smuggling network and a rescue operation.
The human cost of the Channel route remains severe regardless of political position. On Monday, two men died attempting to cross from Berck in northern France, while other migrants suffered injuries linked to fuel exposure during the attempted journey.
Mahmood’s claim about widespread rape places another grim layer over that reality. It suggests that by the time some women reach northern France, they may already have passed through a transnational trafficking economy in which sexual exploitation, coercion and violence accompany the promise of illegal entry into Britain.
The Refugee Council seized on that part of Mahmood’s argument from a different direction. Its director Imran Hussain said the answer should include more safe and legal routes so women fleeing war and persecution are not forced into the hands of traffickers in the first place.
That is precisely where Britain’s immigration debate divides. Refugee advocates argue that additional legal pathways would undermine smugglers, while restrictionists counter that creating more admission routes risks expanding migration rather than making illegal crossings ineffective.
The government’s recently expired agreement with France has added to doubts about whether incremental cross-Channel arrangements can solve the problem. The “one in, one out” scheme ended on October 1 after more than a year in operation, having exchanged roughly 1,500 asylum seekers while more than 40,000 people crossed the Channel during the same period.
Under that model, Britain could return an asylum seeker to France in exchange for admitting another person legally from France. In practice, the scheme remained far smaller than the overall flow, while French officials increasingly wanted migration enforcement handled on a wider European basis.
That experience, to conservative, anti-globalists, and sovereignty-minded critics, strengthens the argument that Britain cannot subcontract border control to agreements dependent on Paris, Brussels or broader European consent. They contend that the decisive test is whether unauthorized arrival actually results in removal rather than eventual residence after processing.
The political pressure is unlikely to ease simply because crossings have fallen from last year’s levels. Sky News reported 19,451 Channel crossings so far in 2026, down 43% from the corresponding point in 2025 but still representing thousands of people reaching Britain through an unauthorized route.
Mahmood’s interview also exposed another politically awkward divide within the Home Secretary’s own worldview. She described herself as having long belonged to the “pro-Palestinian cause” and admitted feeling “very uncomfortable” watching some Palestine Action supporters arrested under terrorism legislation.
Merseyside Police said officers dealt with 161 people at a Defend Our Juries demonstration during Labour’s Liverpool conference. Eighty-two were arrested on suspicion of displaying or carrying material supporting the proscribed Palestine Action organization, while another 79 were reported for summons.
Mahmood said some of those demonstrators were people she recognized from pro-Palestinian activism and acknowledged discomfort at seeing them caught by Section 13 of the Terrorism Act. She nevertheless defended enforcing the law, saying principles must still be applied when doing so conflicts with one’s personal sympathies.
For the government, the policy challenge is therefore becoming brutally simple even if the politics are not: dismantle trafficking networks, protect abused migrants, determine asylum claims, remove people without a right to remain and restore confidence that entry into Britain is controlled by the British state. The present system remains vulnerable to the charge that traffickers set the journey in motion while British authorities inherit the consequences once boats reach the Channel.
Mahmood may have intended her remarks primarily as an indictment of smugglers and the violence inflicted on migrants, but her most politically damaging sentence was broader. When the Home Secretary herself says “we’re not in control of this border,” critics of Britain’s immigration settlement do not need to invent a sovereignty crisis—the minister responsible for the border has described one in her own words.
Jordan Conradson joined Steve Bannon to discuss the latest election controversy in Arizona. – War Room grab
The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Tuesday morning.
On Monday, Jordan asked President Trump to comment on the breaking news that Maricopa County officials announced that Runbeck Election Services had mistakenly sent out thousands of ballots by mistake.
A similar issue occurred in 2022, when over 60,000 ballots with incorrect races were sent to voters by mistake ahead of the August primary elections.
Maricopa County announced on Sunday that over 3,000 ballots were mistakenly sent to voters by its ballot printing vendor, Runbeck Election Services, nearly a week before early voting is set to begin in the Grand Canyon State.
Runbeck has a history of controversies. The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on this shady private entity, which was founded by leftists and transports and scans Maricopa County mail-in ballots with no oversight or chain of custody before they are processed and counted by the County.
President Trump told Jordan, “Maricopa just sent out thousands of ballots in error, Maricopa County in Arizona. And they have to be ashamed of themselves.”
Trump added, “By the way, there were no errors. You know that, right? There were no errors.”
Maricopa and Runbeck have run out of chances for these so-called mistakes to be perceived as innocent. Arizona just wants fair elections
On Tuesday Steve Bannon asked Jordan about Runbeck Election Services and their latest slip-up.
Jordan told Steve: “Thank you for highlighting this important issue that’s going on in Maricopa County still. I mean, Runbeck’s had concerns in 2020 and 2022 and 2024, and now they have this weird quote-unquote error. Apparently, they sent out about over 3,000 ballots to people before early voting was even set to begin, before the ballots were supposed to be mailed out.
They say it was a mistake. They say that they put the ballots on the wrong pallet or gave the wrong pallet to USPS and these ballots got sent out. Now they’re saying, there’s no issue, this didn’t cause any voter disenfranchisement or anything, we should just sweep it under the rug.
Maricopa County announced it on Sunday. They said that Runbeck didn’t even wanna put out a statement about it publicly. They didn’t wanna talk about it, they wanted to just sweep it under the rug. And it’s really representative of the lack of transparency we’ve received from Maricopa County and Runbeck in the past.
Steve Bannon: Luckily, for all our new viewers and listeners, this is an infamous company. In 2022, Kari Lake, the steal went through Runbeck. Am I wrong in that, Brother Conradson?
Jordan Conradson: That’s right. In Kari Lake’s lawsuit, it was alleged that I believe almost 300,000 (actual amount, 35,000) ballots were lacking chain of custody after— chain of custody documentation after they went through Runbeck to be scanned in and sent to the county. So there are these thousands of ballots that are believed to have basically come out of nowhere at the hands of Runbeck. And I mean, what’s especially shocking is this election, you’ve got the same fraudsters on the ballot that were on the ballot in 2022. You’ve got Katie Hobbs, Chris Mayes, Adrian Fontes, the cartel lawyer turned Arizona Secretary of State.
And… people in Arizona are scared. They don’t want this to happen again. They don’t want this to happen to Andy Biggs, Alex Culloden, Warren Peterson, all the great candidates that are running for these statewide positions. And it’s causing a lot of anxiety for the people of Arizona.
Steve ended the segment with these remarks about TGP reporter, Jordan Conradson, “Rock star, incredible! Almost got arrested out in Arizona doing his job!”
German authorities, according to reports, arrested former Federal Intelligence Service chief August Hanning on Tuesday on suspicion of treasonous espionage, obtaining state secrets, attempted treason, and acting on behalf of a foreign intelligence service.
Federal prosecutors said officers also detained a former BND employee identified as Manfred D.
Federal Criminal Police officers arrested the 80-year-old Hanning in North Rhine-Westphalia, while Manfred D. was taken into custody in Bavaria. Investigators also searched properties in Berlin as part of the expanding federal case.
Germany’s Federal Prosecutor’s Office said both men were expected to appear before judges at the Federal Court of Justice. The judges will determine whether they should remain in pretrial detention while investigators continue examining the alleged intelligence operation.
“The accused Hanning is under strong suspicion of espionage constituting treason,” prosecutors said. The allegations concern conduct that took place years after Hanning left the BND.
According to investigators, Hanning and Manfred D. allegedly reached an arrangement in the spring of 2010 under which the former aide would continue supplying him with valuable intelligence.
Prosecutors say Manfred D. provided the material “in exchange for remuneration,” while Hanning used some of it in his private consulting work.
The alleged document flow continued for years. Prosecutors believe Manfred D. passed approximately 2,000 documents to Hanning through June 2022, many containing classified information reserved exclusively for internal BND use.
Some of the material was particularly sensitive. Investigators say it included briefings prepared for regular intelligence meetings involving senior security officials at the German Chancellery.
Manfred D. had been unusually well placed to obtain such material. He previously served as Hanning’s bureau chief and later became chief of staff to several successive BND presidents, remaining inside the agency from March 2012 until March 2026.
“The current findings suggest that, over the years, Manfred D. provided Hanning with approximately 2,000 documents,” federal prosecutors said. Many of those documents, they added, contained information intended solely for use inside Germany’s foreign intelligence service.
Hanning allegedly did more than simply retain the documents for private reference. Prosecutors say he used classified intelligence on at least one occasion to prepare an analysis for an officer working for a foreign intelligence service.
“On one occasion, Hanning used classified intelligence … to draft an analysis for an officer of a foreign intelligence service,” prosecutors said. Investigators added that they have not yet established whether “the material reached the intended recipient.”
Authorities also accuse Hanning of maintaining a longstanding relationship with a representative of a second foreign intelligence organization. During that relationship, prosecutors allege, he passed political information that was partly derived from material supplied by Manfred D.
Federal prosecutors have not publicly identified either of the foreign intelligence services involved. German media reports have suggested that the services are not believed to be Russian, but authorities have not confirmed that claim.
Manfred D. faces allegations of aiding and abetting attempted treason and treasonous espionage. Prosecutors argue that his continued access to sensitive BND material allowed him to supply Hanning long after Hanning himself had left government service.
The case is politically striking in part because Hanning has publicly challenged parts of Germany’s prevailing foreign-policy narrative in recent years.
In 2024, he accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky of involvement in the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, an allegation that drew considerable attention in Germany.
The current espionage investigation, however, does not publicly link Hanning’s arrest to his statements about Nord Stream. Prosecutors have framed the case around his alleged possession, use and transfer of classified BND material dating back many years.
The investigation reportedly emerged almost by accident from a completely different criminal case. Hamburg authorities searched Hanning’s home and offices in September 2025 while examining allegations connected to businesswoman Christina Block and a bitter child-custody dispute.
Block has been accused of arranging the abduction of her two youngest children in late 2023. Investigators have also alleged that Hanning had some involvement in an earlier attempted abduction, an accusation he has denied.
During those searches, officers reportedly discovered an electronic storage device containing secret BND documents. Hamburg investigators then referred the material to federal prosecutors in May 2026, opening the path to the espionage inquiry that culminated in Tuesday’s arrests.
Hanning led the BND from December 1998 until November 2005, placing him at the top of German foreign intelligence during the post-Cold War period and the years immediately following the September 11 attacks.
He later served as a state secretary in the Interior Ministry until 2009 before moving into business and private security consulting.
The documents at the center of the current case reportedly date from well after Hanning left the BND. That distinction is central to prosecutors’ case, which alleges that he continued obtaining sensitive government intelligence through an insider rather than simply retaining documents from his own time in office.
The arrests come as Germany continues grappling with a series of serious intelligence-security cases. In another major case, former BND officer Carsten L. has been accused of passing classified information about the Ukraine war and the Wagner Group to Russia in return for roughly €400,000, allegations being tested in an ongoing trial.
For now, Hanning and Manfred D. remain suspects, not convicted offenders, and the identities of the foreign intelligence services allegedly involved remain undisclosed.
What prosecutors ultimately prove will determine whether the case becomes one of the most consequential espionage scandals to hit Germany’s intelligence establishment in years.
President Trump on Tuesday reacted to the riots in France as the Islamo-Marxist migrants continued to clash with police.
‘Student’ protests erupted in Paris’s migrant-filled suburbs last week over crowded classrooms and teacher shortages.
The protests expanded to other cities and became violent as Muslim migrants used it as an excuse to take over the streets and assault law enforcement.
Islamo-Marxist rioters continued to clash with police on Tuesday. Police responded with tear gas and rubber bullets.
WATCH:
President Trump said the riots are not about schools.
It’s about the out-of-control mass migration of sub-Saharan Africans and Muslims wanting to take over.
According to some estimates, more than 20% of Paris’s population is foreign-born. Approximately 500,000 people in Paris are migrants (out of 2 million people).
The greater surrounding urban area has been conquered by MILLIONS of foreigners. Nearly half the population of Paris’s metro area is either foreign-born or has an immigrant parent.
The migrants are from North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa.
“What’s happening in France is nothing less than out of control mass migration. This isn’t about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great Country! President DJT,” Trump said.
Click here to read TGP’s deep dive into the France riots.
Imagine your mom and dad intentionally sent you to a bad school. How would you respond?
Some 11 years ago, parents Faraji and Nikole Hannah-Jones dropped their daughter off at school for the first time. Because of New York City’s novel Pre-K for All program, they could apply for any of the 1,800 options across the city.
Instead of choosing the school that was best for their daughter, they deliberately sent young Najya to a school they knew was subpar.
Now they’re left wondering if that decision was a mistake.
On Sept. 20, Nikole Hannah-Jones released an essay examining all of this and more. The title says it all: “In Fighting for Every Black Child, Did I Betray My Own?”
Hannah-Jones, a longtime writer for The New York Times, has spent much of her adult life investigating racism in America. Best known for her work on the 1619 Project, Hannah-Jones also spent significant time reporting on school inequality.
When it came time to send her child to school, however, Hannah-Jones had a difficult choice: prioritize her daughter’s education or fight the “hopeless battle for school integration.” She chose the latter.
To counter the segregation of the New York City schools, Hannah-Jones sent her black daughter to a predominantly black school.
In the essay, she expressed hope that her family’s wealth, voice, and influence would help bring positive change. It didn’t go as planned.
Within 10 months of starting pre-K, Najya found herself on the cover of The New York Times Magazine. According to Hannah-Jones, she “hadn’t intended at first” to write about their decision, but eventually felt the need to speak out against the systemic problems she saw.
And the problems only got worse.
Hannah-Jones writes that toward the end of first grade, she visited Najya during lunch. “Children were running wild, chasing, hitting and pushing each other while the teacher’s aides and cafeteria workers stood by looking bored,” she said.
“It was not the children that horrified me — kids of all incomes are rambunctious at lunchtime. It was the callous disregard of the adults.”
As detailed in her piece, this chaotic atmosphere made learning difficult. By the time fourth grade came around, Najya “was not performing on grade level in any of her academic subjects.”
In the essay, Hannah-Jones recalled that she asked for copies of her daughter’s schoolwork, which Najya brought home in her backpack. A brief glance revealed that none of the schoolwork was graded. So, Hannah-Jones began checking her daughter’s work. She found that most of the answers were wrong.
According to Hannah-Jones, the same problems followed Najya into her English assignments, which were “rife with uncorrected punctuation, capitalization and grammar errors.”
This wasn’t just a fourth-grade problem. In the essay, Hannah-Jones describes how her daughter carried the weight of insufficient schooling into the fifth, sixth, and seventh grades. Eventually, Najya had to speak up.
“Did you know my school was bad like this when you decided to put me here?” she asked her mom one day after school.
As they drove home, Najya rattled off test scores and school ratings, frustrated about being placed in an inferior environment.
Her mother finally gave in. Najya studied hard and was accepted into a prestigious New York City high school, where she is making up for lost time. Her story, however, is far from over.
A recent podcast episode revealed her opposition to her daughter’s desire to attend Harvard due to its status as a PWI — a predominantly white institution.
“I’m disappointed. I’m like, what is wrong with you?” said Hannah-Jones. Instead, she pushed for Howard University — preferring a school ranked No. 73 over one ranked No. 3.
That same podcast episode gave Najya the opportunity to confront her mother: “All you’re supposed to do is just put me in a good school.”
(@ConradsonJordan) 
