FBI Arrests Washington “Trans Woman” Accused of Helping Plot the Canadian School Shooting — Sent Cash, Tactical Advice, and Watched the Livestream as Children Were Shot

The FBI arrested a 30-year-old Bellingham, Washington resident on Tuesday and charged him with conspiracy to murder persons in a foreign country for allegedly coaching, funding, and agreeing to broadcast the February 10 slaughter at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School in British Columbia, the attack that left 8 people dead, including 5 children.

James Cody Bryant was taken into custody in Bellingham and appeared in federal court in Seattle.

The charge carries a maximum sentence of life in federal prison.

According to the Department of Justice announcement and the accompanying 41-page FBI criminal complaint, Bryant allegedly maintained extensive communications with 18-year-old Jesse Van Rootselaar during the six months before the February 10 massacre.

Both Bryant and Van Rootselaar were born male and identified as transgender women, according to police and federal officials.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police said in February that Van Rootselaar was “born a biological male” who began identifying as female about six years earlier.

On Tuesday, U.S. officials said they understood Bryant was also born male and identified as female.

Van Rootselaar first murdered her mother and stepbrother at the family home before driving to Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, federal investigators said.

Inside the school, Van Rootselaar killed five children between the ages of 12 and 13 and an educational assistant, seriously wounded other students, detonated an improvised explosive device, and fired through locked classroom doors before exchanging gunfire with police and ultimately dying from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Eight victims were murdered in total, six at the school and two at the family residence. Department of Justice

And according to federal officials, Van Rootselaar was not operating in an online vacuum.

FBI: Bryant Allegedly Helped Plan and Promote the Bloodbath

The FBI complaint alleges that Bryant and Van Rootselaar communicated repeatedly on Discord about weapons, potential targets, livestreaming the murders, hiding their communications, and maximizing the attack’s impact.

During one discussion about possible locations, Bryant allegedly offered chilling tactical advice, writing: “Wide open spaces means numbers.”

Investigators say Bryant also helped Van Rootselaar test the livestream setup ahead of the massacre and agreed to record and redistribute the video online.

Federal prosecutors further allege that Bryant sent money that ultimately funded items connected to the attack.

The complaint says Bryant purchased the shoes Van Rootselaar later wore during the massacre and sent money for a lighter intended for an explosive device.

Screenshot: DOJ

Investigators also documented discussions about money for stickers placed on firearms.

One photograph included in the federal complaint shows a shotgun posed directly in front of a transgender pride flag with a transgender-themed sticker attached to the firearm.

Screenshot: DOJ

After Van Rootselaar sent Bryant the image, Bryant allegedly replied: “love the stickers.”

Other photographs and reporting on the complaint show weapons and accessories decorated in the blue, pink, and white colors associated with the transgender pride flag.

Screenshot: DOJ

Perhaps most disturbing are the allegations that Bryant understood there was an opportunity to warn authorities, and repeatedly promised not to do it.

According to the FBI complaint, Bryant acknowledged potentially being able to “save lives I guess,” but repeatedly assured Van Rootselaar that law enforcement would not be contacted.

In another exchange cited by investigators, Bryant allegedly wrote: “I still won’t snitch.”

The DOJ says Bryant did occasionally urge Van Rootselaar not to carry out the attack. But prosecutors allege Bryant nevertheless continued assisting with preparations and never alerted authorities.

Even after Van Rootselaar had allegedly murdered two family members, investigators say Bryant provided advice that helped the killer start the family vehicle and drive to the school.

Moments before the school massacre began, Van Rootselaar initiated the livestream.

Bryant responded: “Watching now.”

According to the FBI, the Twitch livestream lasted approximately 20 seconds and was viewed by only one Twitch account, an account investigators say was registered using Bryant’s identifying information.

The Gateway Pundit extensively reported on Van Rootselaar following the February massacre.

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Canadian authorities drew controversy after announcing they would honor Van Rootselaar’s preferred gender identity and pronouns even while detailing the murders.

The Gateway Pundit also reported on the family of 12-year-old victim Kylie Smith, whose relatives were forced to cancel her funeral amid reported death threats.

The post FBI Arrests Washington “Trans Woman” Accused of Helping Plot the Canadian School Shooting — Sent Cash, Tactical Advice, and Watched the Livestream as Children Were Shot appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Join Joe Hoft, Mel K, John Eastman, Esq and Michael Jaco at New California Event Thursday and Friday in San Juan Obispo

Join Joe Hoft, Mel K, John Eastman, Esq, and Michael Jaco at the New California Event on Thursday and Friday in San Juan Obispo.

Get your tickets here.

The Crisis in California

California is the most dramatic illustration of the problem. It is the most populous state in the Union, with roughly 39 million people. A handful of coastal metropolitan regions — Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Sacramento — dominate its politics, culture, and policy. The result has been a generation of governance that many inland, northern, and rural Californians experience as tyranny.

High taxes and a hostile business climate have driven companies and families out. Open-border policies and sanctuary rules have strained public services and public safety. Destructive wildfires have been worsened by forest mismanagement. Homelessness remains a visible crisis on city streets even when official counts claim improvement. Elections have repeatedly returned the same leadership despite widespread dissatisfaction outside the urban cores. Rural counties find themselves governed by a legislature and executive whose priorities and values are alien to their communities.

The fundamental issue is structural. When one or two urban centers can permanently outvote the rest of a vast state, democratic accountability collapses for everyone outside those centers. The people who produce the food, the energy, the timber, and much of the practical work of the state are reduced to permanent political minorities in their own homes.

This is not a temporary policy disagreement. It is a constitutional and cultural mismatch that cannot be fixed by ordinary elections inside the existing state boundaries. The only peaceful, lawful, and American remedy is division.

The West Virginia Model: How a New State Was Actually Formed

Article IV, Section 3 of the United States Constitution provides the path: “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.”[1]

The critical historical question is what happens when the existing state government refuses consent — or has itself rejected the authority of the United States. West Virginia answers that question.

When Virginia seceded and joined the Confederacy, the people of the northwestern counties refused to go along. Those counties wanted to remain loyal to the Union and free of slavery. Because the Confederate government of Virginia would never consent to their departure, the people of those counties did not wait for permission. They organized themselves.

Delegates from the loyal counties met, formed their own constitutional conventions, and created their own government. They established a new legislature (a Senate and a House of Delegates) based on the counties that wished to separate. They chose their own executive and began building the judicial institutions of a functioning state. In short, they did not rely on the existing Virginia government to “okay” their exit. They created a complete constitutional body themselves — a new legislature, executive, and framework of laws — resting on the consent of the people of those counties.

Congress then recognized that new government. In 1863 West Virginia was admitted to the Union as a new state. The United States accepted the legitimacy of the government the people of the region had formed. The hostile, seceded Virginia government was not allowed to veto the process. The people of the separating region, acting through their own representative institutions, and the Congress of the United States were sufficient.[2]

There is a precedent and a need.  Join the courageous people of New California.

The post Join Joe Hoft, Mel K, John Eastman, Esq and Michael Jaco at New California Event Thursday and Friday in San Juan Obispo appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Republicans Starting to Realize They Have a Shot at Picking Up a Senate Seat in Minnesota With Michele Tafoya (VIDEO)

Screencap of Twitter/X video.

Michele Tafoya, the former sports broadcaster running as a Republican in the Minnesota Senate race, is hitting the campaign trail hard and voters in the state are taking her very seriously.

This could be the sleeper race of 2026. Even John Thune has been in Minnesota campaigning with her.

Tonight on FOX News, Bret Baier devoted an entire segment to Tafoya’s rise and the fact that the GOP increasingly sees this election as a possible pickup in the Senate.

The issue of fraud is taking a toll on Democrat candidate Peggy Flanagan.

Watch the whole thing:

Alpha News of Minnesota has done a report on how Thune is trying to help Tafoya in the state:

Republican U.S. Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, who serves as Senate majority leader, traveled to Minnesota Tuesday to join Michele Tafoya for a series of campaign stops as polling continues to show a tight race for Minnesota’s open U.S. Senate seat.

Thune and Tafoya visited Cambria, where they met with company leadership and workers before participating in an agricultural roundtable with farmers hosted by the Minnesota Farm Bureau, which has endorsed Tafoya’s campaign. The visit also included a fundraiser for Tafoya’s campaign that raised nearly $300,000.

“The best farm policy comes from producers, from people who are actually out there making a living on the farm,” Thune said during a press conference at Pfarr Family Farm in Le Sueur. “We can have all these meetings in Washington as we’re talking about policy, but there’s no substitute for getting out and hearing firsthand from the people who are actually out there producing the food and fiber that feeds and clothes and fuels our world.”

Thune said securing year-round E15 remains one of his priorities as Congress works on a new farm bill, calling it “enormously helpful and important.”

“If you want to see fuel costs go down, create more supply of fuel, and we can do that with E15,” Thune said.

Democrats will absolutely lose their minds if they lose this seat in the Senate.

The post Republicans Starting to Realize They Have a Shot at Picking Up a Senate Seat in Minnesota With Michele Tafoya (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Socialist Running for Congress in New York Wants Democrats to Pass a ‘Trans Bill of Rights’ if They Win Midterms (VIDEO)

Screencap of YouTube video.

Claire Valdez is a DSA type Democrat running in New York’s 7th Congressional District.

During a recent podcast appearance, Valdez describes meeting with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and says that she brought up several issues that are important to her, including a ‘trans bill of rights’ which she wants Democrats to pass if they win the midterms.

Democrats have made it clear that they will not let go of the trans issue, no matter what the public thinks. There is simply too much money in the LGBT activist community and the Democrats need it to run campaigns.

Breitbart News reports:

Socialist Democrat Nominee Claire Valdez Says She Pitched ‘Trans Bill of Rights’ to Hakeem Jeffries

Socialist Claire Valdez affirmed that a “trans bill of rights” is among the top issues that she wants Democrats to deliver on if they take back control of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Valdez and Avila Chevalier were also asked if they had spoken to House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) about issues like whether ending the war with Iran is a “condition” for “supporting him as speaker” if Democrats take control of the U.S. House.

“We saw the reporting that Hakeem Jeffries has reached out to you guys, and that you’ve talked with him,” cohost Holly Pretsky said. “Is this something you talked to him about as a condition for, maybe, supporting him as Speaker should Democrats take the House back?”

“We haven’t talked about — we haven’t had that kind of conversation, but I, you know, in my conversation recently I wanted to emphasize how important certain issues were in my district and that were defining parts of my race, and that includes the war,” Valdez responded. “It includes the genocide, Medicare for all, Trans Bill of Rights, like, there are a lot of things that I ran on that I want to deliver for my district, and I think it’s our responsibility to do exactly that.”

Watch the video:

Why does the trans community need its own bill of rights?

Did you notice that the question is never even asked?

The post Socialist Running for Congress in New York Wants Democrats to Pass a ‘Trans Bill of Rights’ if They Win Midterms (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Coming Age of Austerity

The Coming Age of Austerity

Worrying about the fisc is uncool, but the alternatives may prove worse.

US-ECONOMY-DEBT

When the author was young, lo! these many slipping years ago, one of the faddish ways people with degrees would complain about the world was to talk about “austerity,” a dirty word in the same vein as “neoliberalism” and a few other choice terms that were soon replaced by the new vocabulary of griping furnished by the then-cutting edge identity politics.

The basic argument was that government spending and headcounts declined after the initial spasms of emergency legislation dealing with the 2008 financial crisis. In the subsequent period of low interest rates, the argument ran, there was more latitude for aggressive government spending to solve whatever structural economic problems you thought ailed the country.

While this line of argument was deployed mostly as a socially acceptable way to grouse about Barack Obama for college-educated young people, a dispositionally disgruntled demographic, it did contain a kernel of insight. There were (and are) real causes of concern about our system, particularly financialization and stagnation; it is easier to do something when credit is cheap.

The details undercut this simple picture somewhat. While total government spending declined, federal spending still grew steadily, and it is federal spending specifically, not total government spending, that is the primary variable for the national debt. Nor was government spending necessarily a political winner: The bank and auto company bailouts were spectacularly unpopular, and quantitative easing ended up bolstering financial institutions’ cash reserves more than stimulating any kind of tangible growth. Hence the Tea Party revolution, which was, in its strange way, the right-wing counterpart of the Occupy movement.

In any case, whatever pretensions to austerity were still hanging around flew out the window during Covid and the Biden presidency. Joe Biden, for better or worse, had the sort of visionary scope that Obama eschewed. In addition to a second, larger, and probably unnecessary round of Covid stimulus, there were packages for green energy, the semiconductor industry, and a grab-bag of other causes and interests on whom the sun of Washington smiled for a season. The result was, perhaps predictably, the worst bout of inflation the country had suffered since the ’80s. 

It turns out that Americans loathe inflation, which is pretty amusing for someone who spends a lot of time writing about parts of the world where a 20 percent inflation rate barely warrants comment. They delivered unified government to the Republicans in 2024 on inflation, and they seem primed to throw them out of Congress this year on the same grounds. (Although the residual classical monetarist in me would like to distinguish between supply shocks and inflation simpliciter.) At the same time, the Trump administration has an ambitious if not always coherent program that needs to be paid for and that only minimally involves the legislature’s oversight. 

Bond markets have been going berserk as a result, tightening credit even apart from the Federal Reserve raising benchmark interest rates. This is less than ideal: Tightening credit cramps growth, and growth declining means there will be less revenue filling the kitty at the same time that servicing the American sovereign debt is getting more expensive. 

Something’s gotta give here. Either the American people will have to make their political peace with running the economy hot and the consequent inflation, or real austerity will come and wash all this spending off the streets. A debt crisis could force the issue. 

Fiscal hawks have had a bad habit of predicting catastrophes that don’t come on schedule. I’m not an economist or a financier, so I won’t pretend to know whether the decisive moment will be next year, or in 2028, or further down the road. Yet it is simply true that servicing government debt is becoming thematic: At $1.2 trillion annually, it accounts for 19 percent of annual federal spending, a line-item second only to Social Security. More money going to interest payments, even short of some sort of cataclysmic reckoning, will simply continue to drag on other spending priorities. By hook or by crook, the government will be doing less.

This condition comes at a bad time in American politics. The Democrats are currently duking it out among themselves over whether a little socialism or a horse’s dose of it is the winning formula. The Republicans have also decided they don’t mind cranking on the taps for their own pet priorities, whether it’s blowing up mullahs or trying to get middle-class women to have children. An actual statesman running for president in 2028 would be sounding the alarm, trying to ameliorate or obviate the crisis before it happens. In the real world, however, it looks like the politicos will do what politicos always do: pass the buck and hold on for dear life. When the music stops, though, it is unlikely to come back on for a long while. Welcome to the Age of Austerity.

The post The Coming Age of Austerity appeared first on The American Conservative.

Trump Gives Brazil’s Bolsonaro a Boost

Trump Gives Brazil’s Bolsonaro a Boost

The administration has sought to influence elections in Latin America.

BRAZIL-ELECTION-RUNOFF-CAMPAIGN
(Sergio Lima / AFP via Getty Images)

Brazilians cast their votes Sunday in the first round of an election that the polls predicted would be very close. It was, though the polls failed to predict which candidate would take first place. Flávio Bolsonaro, the right-wing son of the previous president, Jair Bolsonaro, beat the incumbent left-wing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva by 2 points, 47 to 45 percent. Since Bolsonaro failed to secure an outright majority, a runoff will be held on October 25.

Da Silva said, “I confess I was convinced I would win the election in the first round.”

There are several reasons for Bolsonaro’s unexpectedly strong performance. But one of them is the Trump administration’s role. It would not be the first time the U.S. has interfered in a Brazilian election, or even be the second.

In 1964, the U.S. cooperated in the coup that removed João Goulart from power, beginning a military dictatorship that would govern Brazil for the next two decades. The evidence that Washington cooperated in the coup is well documented. President Lyndon B. Johnson said he was “prepared to do everything that we need to do” to assist. 

Years later, when Dilma Rousseff was removed in a coup whose leading players were allies of the American government, the U.S. implicitly recognized the new coup government by welcoming one of its key representatives to Washington.

Lula, Brazilian intelligence, and a small group of U.S. senators have all accused the Trump administration of interfering in Brazil’s current election as well. The three Democratic senators—Jeanne Shaheen, Peter Welch and Tim Kaine—accused the Trump administration of “an effort to interfere with, and potentially undermine, Brazil’s general election.”

That interference has taken many forms, including tariffs on Brazil. Flávio’s brother, Eduardo, had lobbied hard for those tariffs. The tariffs were not just about rebalancing trade. When Trump informed da Silva of the levies, the first two justifications he provided were “Brazil’s insidious attacks on free elections, and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans.” The tariffs were clearly meant to help the Bolsonaros, who are Trump allies, and hamper da Silva, who has been a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s foreign policy. Mark Weisbrot, a Latin America expert and codirector of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, told The American Conservative that Trump made it clear that Brazilians would suffer “tariffs and other punishments if they do not elect Bolsonaro.” The threat was a repeat of Trump’s strategy of interference in the recent elections in Honduras. 

Flávio also successfully lobbied Trump to classify two Brazilian crime groups as terrorist organizations. The move was seen as a setback for da Silva, who opposed the classification, and a boost for Flávio Bolsonaro. Trump’s declaration that da Silva is “weak on taking on drug gangs” can be seen as further evidence that the effort was intended to undercut support for the current Brazilian president.

This was not the only lobbying done by Bolsonaros. Flávio has visited Trump in the White House, and Eduardo has met often with U.S. lawmakers.

Washington also tried to send State Department officials to Brazil “on a mission to cast doubt on the fairness and integrity of the country’s electoral system,” the Washington Post reported. The officials also planned to meet with Flávio Bolsonaro. Moreover, the Trump administration has directed funds to promote right-wing organizations including civil society groups in Brazil.

Weisbrot told TAC that “Bolsonaro has a media and social media advantage and a big money advantage,” and “Trump is playing a huge role because he so monopolizes the media.” This summer, as a Brazilian news outlet reported, the consulate in São Paulo invited anti-Lula influencers to participate in meetings on free speech.

And just two days before the election, the U.S. closed consular services in Brazil, citing security concerns. Da Silva has complained that the unusual move is meant to make the elections seem unstable.

It’s not clear to what extent Trump’s interference in the Brazilian election affected the results in the first round. But the fact that the Trump administration tried to influence the results is worth noting, if only to better understand its aims in the region.

Trump has demonstrated a pattern of interfering in Latin America’s presidential elections, in the last seven of which since the start of 2025 right-wing candidates have won. Trump has been less than reticent about the role he has played, boasting that Latin American politics features “lots of people that I got elected.” He has managed to help get “his people” into power in Colombia, Honduras, Argentina, Chile and Venezuela. Whether Bolsonaro in Brazil becomes the latest leader boosted into power by Trump remains to be seen.

The post Trump Gives Brazil’s Bolsonaro a Boost appeared first on The American Conservative.

Undercover Recording Suggests James Talarico Campaign is Disregarding Black Voters (VIDEO)

Man in a suit with a concerned expression, sitting in front of a blurred Texas flag background.

Man in a suit with a concerned expression, sitting in front of a blurred Texas flag background.
James Talarico

In the Texas Senate race, far left Democrat James Talarico has had an ongoing issue with black voters. His primary opponent Jasmine Crockett has said repeatedly that she believes racism played a major role in the primary and perhaps many black voters agree with her.

There is a newly surfaced recording of the vice chair of the Texas Democrats, Sheena Flanary, who is black, and she describes being basically dismissed by the James Talarico campaign, even when she tried to offer support.

The details are pretty damning.

Transcript via Newsbusters:

Crockett Supporter: “We put in a lot of work, you know, to get Jasmine in. And then, what I felt like I saw, is that, you know, that they chose the White guy, is what it felt like.”

Sheena Flanary: “Yeah.”

Crockett Supporter: “You know what I mean?”

Flanary: “Yeah.”

Crockett Supporter: “It felt very, um, kind of racist.”

Flanary: “Yeah.”

Crockett Supporter: “The way it was done, just felt really like intentionally racist and sexist.”

Flanary: “Yeah. You’re not wrong. I felt it, too. And, I tried to reach out a few times and it wasn’t receptive and reciprocated. And, I’m like, ‘I’m not, why am I trying so hard? So.”

Crockett Supporter: “Oh, you mean reach out to like the Tala…(sic)?”

Flanary: “Yeah, the campaign. I’ve had a bad taste in my mouth from a few interactions that I’ve attempted to actual reach out to them, with no requests for anything, you know, on my behalf, just, you know, to try to support – and I was kind of rebuffed.

“And, I’m like, ‘Okay, so do you want Black people to help you or you don’t want Black people to help you?’ It was kind of weird.

“I mean, even me and my husband even offered to do a fundraiser for him. So, he didn’t even want our money. Which is so weird because, before this, I thought we were kind of cool.”

Crockett Supporter: “So, he’s making all these, kind of like, you know, statements to, sort of like, ensure Black support – like he would support reparations and blah, blah, blah, blah – but, it feels like you said, a little bit too late and I feel like he’s just trying to pacify Black people who he’s largely overlooked.

“Like, he has not been looking out for Black people.”

Listen to the clip below:

In related news, James Talarico has been kind of missing lately.

Is his campaign imploding?

The post Undercover Recording Suggests James Talarico Campaign is Disregarding Black Voters (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Crowd is Silent as Kamala Harris Maniacally Laughs During Campaign Event with Democrat Congressional Candidate Richard Pan (VIDEO)

Kamala Harris hit the campaign trail on Friday with Democrat Congressional candidate Richard Pan – and it was a disaster.

Dr. Richard Pan is a former California state senator who is currently running for California’s 6th Congressional District in the Sacramento area.

Pan is facing off against incumbent Republican-turned-Independent Rep. Kevin Kiley.

Kamala Harris and Richard Pan blocked reporters from covering the campaign event at Pan’s headquarters, according to KCRA:

Former Vice President Kamala Harris and Democratic Congressional candidate Richard Pan blocked some news organizations, including KCRA 3, from covering their public appearance in Sacramento on Friday.

Harris’ team and Pan’s team are blaming each other for the decision to exclude some journalists from covering the event.

While several other outlets, including two local TV stations, The Sacramento Bee and Los Angeles Times, covered Harris’ stop at Pan’s campaign headquarters, KCRA 3 was not invited and not approved to cover the event, Pan’s campaign confirmed.

A spokesman for Pan’s campaign told KCRA 3 on Friday night the decision to exclude not just KCRA 3 but also The New York Times, was at the direction of Kamala Harris’ team.

Richard Pan denied banning KCRA and other outlets from the event.

WATCH:

Maybe this is why Richard Pan and Kamala Harris didn’t want the press in the room…

Harris maniacally laughed as she tried to crack a joke (she sounded drunk).

The crowd was dead silent as Kamala Harris waited for them to join her in laughter.

“Please remember to shower!” Harris told the room full of campaign staffers at Pan’s headquarters, laughing.

The staffers sat there quietly and did not laugh.

WATCH:

The post Crowd is Silent as Kamala Harris Maniacally Laughs During Campaign Event with Democrat Congressional Candidate Richard Pan (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

REVEALED: American Airlines M*sturbator Identified – Drunk Woman Caught on Camera Touching Herself

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

The woman who allegedly removed her clothes and began pleasuring herself on an American Airlines flight last month has been identified, and bystander footage of the woman’s mile-high stunt has surfaced. 

The Gateway Pundit previously reported on this incident, but the woman had not been identified at the time, and it was unclear what exactly happened.

American Airlines Flight 1779 was en route from Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport to Miami International Airport on September 11 when the unruly passenger removed all of her clothes and started touching herself, according to a flight attendant onboard.

“FA1 REPORTS THAT PAX IN SEAT 9DEF HAS TAKEN OFF ALL HER CLOTHES AND WAS SEEN BY OTHER PAX TOU* HERSELF IN AN INDECENT MANNER. FOM SAYS THIS MUST BE REPORTED TO IOC/OSM AND HAVE ,” a message on the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System read.

She was subsequently detained upon landing in Miami.

Woman Detained for Stripping and Performing Indecent Acts on American Airlines Flight

 

According to the New York Post, the woman was a 46 year-old bartender from Maryland. She was confronted by a flight attendant during the incident, and she put her clothes back on then “fell asleep for the remainder of the flight.”

The woman had reportedly admitted to having several drinks during her flight delay.

Video from the flight, obtained by TMZ, shows the woman lying on the row of seats with her legs against the window side and appearing to pleasure herself.

Police reported that Inzer had bloodshot eyes and “strong odor of alcohol” when she was questioned.

She has reportedly not been arrested or charged with a crime, and the FBI is currently investigating the incident due to jurisdiction uncertainty.

More from TMZ.

The post REVEALED: American Airlines M*sturbator Identified – Drunk Woman Caught on Camera Touching Herself appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Update: Fort Hood Jihadist Nidal Hasan’s Execution Day Set by Secretary of the Army

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth recommended the jihadist killer be executed by the US Army firing squad – and President Trump approved.

President Trump approved Fort Hood Jihadist Nidal Malik Hasan to be executed by firing squad.

“Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has recommended — and President Donald J. Trump has approved — death by U.S. Army firing squad for convicted terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan, the jihadist who opened fire on unarmed American soldiers at Fort Hood in 2009. He killed 13 people and wounded 32 others while shouting “Allahu Akbar” during the attack,” Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said on Monday.

US Army policy dictates that the execution must take place within 150 days of the president’s approval.

Nidal Hasan will be executed by US Army firing squad at Fort Hood, Texas, on Thursday, December 3rd, 2026 at 1 pm Central Time.

“The execution officer will be the Commandant United States Disciplinary Barracks,” the Secretary of the Army’s memo read.

In November 2009, Hasan, a military psychiatrist, opened fire on unarmed soldiers at Fort Hood military base in Texas.

Hasan killed 13 people and wounded 32 more while shouting “Allahu Akbar!” – and Barack Obama called it “workplace violence.”

Hasan has been on death row at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas since 2013 after he was convicted by a military jury.

This will be the first military execution since 1961.

The post Update: Fort Hood Jihadist Nidal Hasan’s Execution Day Set by Secretary of the Army appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.