French President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday finally responded to the Islamo-Marxist riots.
Islamo-Marxist migrants continued to clash with police over the weekend as Macron partied.
‘Student’ protests erupted in Paris’s migrant-filled suburbs earlier this month over so-called crowded classrooms and teacher shortages.
The protests expanded to other cities and became violent as Muslim migrants used it as an excuse to take over the streets and assault law enforcement.
On Saturday evening, Macron was spotted at a Celine Dion concert as Paris burned.
Thousands of violent protesters on Saturday overturned cars, set buildings ablaze, and attacked police across the country. One of the most historic structures in the entire country, the 143-year-old Limoges Town Hall, burned to the ground as the police struggled control the crowds.
More than 1,800 rioters were arrested on Saturday night.
Meanwhile, Macron and his wife were enjoying a Celine Dion Concert.
Let them eat cake! Emanuel Macron and his wife spend their Friday night at a Celine Dion concert as Paris burns.
On Sunday, Macron addressed the nation and blamed French citizens for the uprising.
“Hundreds of police officers were injured,” Macron said in his opening statement to the nation.
“When we saw the images, we all thought, what was in their heads? How can French people do this to France?” Macron said in a week address. “Why would the Town Hall of Limoges burn down?”
Abdul el-Sayed during a recent interview on Fox News.
Islamo-Marxist Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed once did a college research project so bizarre that it probably helps explain why he never got his doctor’s license.
J.D. Haltigan, PhD, an Honorary Research Fellow at the Heterodox Center and a developmental psychopathologist, uncovered a ‘scientific’ research project that El-Sayed conducted in medical school at Columbia University back in 2011.
The paper discusses “interethnic mating” with a particular focus on Arab mothers who engage in it. El-Sayed discovered that Arab mothers who participate in it have worse birth outcomes than those who mate with Arab men.
El-Sayed also discusses his findings on genetics and the Black race.
Why did he possess the urge to research this garbage?
Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed’s scientific research is…odd.
Arab mothers who engage in “interethnic mating” have worse birth outcomes than those who mate with Arab men?
Also: Genetics, black race, and interracial mating?
Boy, does this sound racist. Abdul El-Sayed conducted a study to assess whether interethnic mating (Arab-American mother + non-Arab father) raises the risk of preterm birth (PTB), very PTB, or late PTB among Arab-American mothers.
Conclusion: Among Arab-American mothers in Michigan (2000–2005), a non-Arab father was associated with higher risk of PTB (OR 1.18) and late PTB (OR 1.24) versus an Arab father. No such association was found among non-Arab white mothers (used as controls). The authors noted the association but called for further work on causal mechanisms.
Y’all, whatever it is you are doing stop right now. This is the biggest news of the day. Sayed wrote a paper in 2011 saying any Arab woman who mates with a Black man will have a greatly increased chance of birth defects for their child.
Interestingly, El Sayed’s only known wife is not Arab. So he, an Arab man, can mate interracially, no problem, but Arab women, in his scientific opinion, it seems, are better off staying within their own tribes.
El Sayed exhibits great many third world attitudes that are repressive, violent, and incompatible with our way of life.
@JDHaltigan Bro, they call white men racist?? Actually publishing a theory on interracial relations that’s one step away from calling their offspring “mongrels” is INSANE
National Republican Senatorial Committee Communications Director Joanna Rodriguez later weighed in with a very apt observation:
“It’s ironic that a radical Muslim with documented ties to designated terrorist organizations is scared of interracial mating,” she told The Post Millennial. “Does Abdul El-Sayed stand by his racist fearmongering?”
The U.S. spends more on healthcare than any other nation, and despite not having socialized medicine, the vast majority of Americans are covered by either employer-sponsored plans or government programs. Photo: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
With the Nov. 3 midterm elections less than three weeks away, healthcare has become a central Democratic campaign issue. An Associated Press analysis of AdImpact data found that healthcare was the most common issue in Democratic House and Senate ads since Sept. 1.
Democrats have made four claims: that Washington spends more on war than on healthcare, that most Americans lack health insurance, that Trump’s Medicaid changes take coverage away from poor Americans, and that socialized medicine provides better care. All four claims are false, as the spending figures, insurance coverage data, Medicaid provisions and international comparisons below demonstrate.
U.S. national health spending reached $5.3 trillion in 2024, or $15,474 per person, according to CMS data. That spending was equal to 18.0 percent of GDP. The federal government paid for 31 percent of total health spending, and state and local governments paid for 16 percent. Combined, government at all levels paid roughly $2.5 trillion.
That figure is nearly double the entire health budget of China, the world’s second-largest economy. According to China’s National Health Commission, China’s total health spending in 2024 was an estimated 9.09 trillion yuan, about $1.27 trillion in public and private spending combined, with the government paying 24.9 percent. Per person, the OECD’s health division head told the Senate Special Committee on Aging that U.S. government health spending per capita was greater than in all other OECD countries.
That spending funds coverage for more than a third of Americans. The Census Bureau found that 92.0 percent of Americans, 310 million people, had health insurance in 2024. Employer coverage was the most common type at 53.8 percent, followed by Medicare at 19.1 percent and Medicaid at 17.6 percent. Overall, 66.1 percent of Americans had private coverage and 35.5 percent had public coverage. Government coverage is concentrated among low-income Americans. Public coverage rates fall as income rises: Census figures show 77.0 percent of children and 50.7 percent of adults in poverty had public coverage, compared with 6.7 percent and 5.7 percent of those at or above 400 percent of the poverty line.
Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law on July 4, 2025, and Democrats have since described its Medicaid provisions as taking healthcare away from vulnerable Americans. In a May 2025 press release, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the bill “the largest healthcare cut in our country’s history” and said millions would lose Medicaid coverage. A statement from Jeffries and House Democratic leaders said the law takes healthcare and food assistance from millions of people to fund tax cuts for the wealthy. Rep. Bobby Scott, ranking member of the House Education and Workforce Committee, said Republicans would strip healthcare from the Americans most in need.
The law does not kick poor people off Medicaid, and it does not raise the income eligibility threshold, which remains 138 percent of the federal poverty line. It simply requires able-bodied adults to work, study or volunteer 80 hours a month.
The 138 percent limit equals about $21,597 a year for an individual in 2025, and adults who qualified on income before the law still qualify on income. What changes is how often eligibility is checked: beginning Jan. 1, 2027, states must verify the income test every six months instead of once a year.
A frequently repeated claim holds that the United States is the only industrialized nation without socialized medicine. Under socialized medicine, the government owns the hospitals and employs the doctors, as in Britain’s National Health Service. Many industrialized countries do not use that model. Switzerland and the Netherlands achieve universal coverage through a mandate that every individual buy a basic plan from regulated private insurers.
Germany, France and Japan use statutory insurance systems with largely private providers. The United States, meanwhile, operates its own government-run system: the Veterans Health Administration runs 170 medical centers and 1,193 outpatient sites serving more than 9.1 million enrolled veterans. Nor is the United States the only OECD country without universal coverage: the OECD reports that coverage for core services remained below 95 percent in four member countries in 2024.
In many countries with government-run systems, a private medical sector operates alongside the public one because patients cannot get timely public care. Among 29 OECD countries with comparable data, nine had private insurance covering more than half the population in 2024. In Britain, NHS waiting lists grew from 4.24 million in March 2020 to 7.37 million in June 2025, and concern about NHS waiting times was the leading reason consumers gave for buying private insurance.
In Ireland, 2.55 million people, about 46 percent of the population, held private health insurance at the end of 2025. The main reasons Irish policyholders gave in the state regulator’s survey were lack of access to public services and longer waiting lists. In Spain, private coverage rose from 23 percent of the population in 2020 to 26 percent in 2025, nearly 13 million people, driven largely by waiting times in the public system.
In Canada, patients leave the country and pay for treatment themselves, overwhelmingly choosing the United States. Long waits and unavailable treatment were leading reasons for seeking care outside Canada. More recently, the Fraser Institute estimated that 105,529 Canadians received non-emergency medical treatment abroad in 2025.
That is ironic given the Canadian criticism that America lacks socialized medicine: Canadians cross the border to pay for American healthcare because they can obtain treatment sooner or access care unavailable at home.
While liberals believe that pointing out America’s lack of socialized medicine is a dig at Republicans, it actually underscores a strength of the U.S. system, where the average salary is higher and the average tax rate is lower than in Canada, Germany, and all but a few countries in the world.
ALI VELSHI: So, Ezra, this is a tricky one because I don’t want to tell people that you don’t have a right in your state to vote on the very last day, at the very last hour, while you’re still in line and not have a passport or a citizenship card with you. That is your right. But there are people working to take that away from you.
So, it just would be better if you didn’t drop your ballot in the mailbox on the last day. And if you did, if you could vote earlier. It’s your right to vote. And there will be people there to help you protect your right. But boy, it will be easier if everybody voted on time and in great numbers to make it too big to be rigged.
EZRA LEVIN: That’s exactly right. This is a tricky issue to cover, Ali. You’re covering something real here because we want to be realistic about the threat—
VELSHI: Right.
LEVIN: —but we don’t want to send the message that Trump is all powerful and that the democracy is a sham. And you shouldn’t even show up because he’s going to rig the whole thing. That is not true. He succeeds by spreading fear and chaos. We need to be confident, take serious the threat. But there are more of us than there are the fascist Americans in this country. That’s just true.
Here’s the clip:
Ali Velshi pleads with people to vote early because Trump might mess with the mailboxes or something, “I don’t want to tell people that you don’t have a right in your in your state to vote on the very last day, at the very last hour, while you’re still in line and not have a… pic.twitter.com/wkfOGPbMkT
The group even offers a scheme to fund a “micro-abortion,” by enrolling in a recurring $5 donation program. The promotion states, “Can’t fund a full abortion but have a need to kill?”
“At first glance, it reads like satire – something so grotesque and absurd that it cannot possibly be real. But it is real. In Central Florida, Stand With Abortion Now (“SWAN”) is selling merchandise that turns the intentional killing of unborn children into a joke, a fashion statement, and a fundraising opportunity,” the ACLJ reported.
SWAN is a “clinic-escort group” that promises to “protect and expand abortion ‘by all means necessary,’” the report explains.
It spends donations by “paying for abortions at its clinic and a sister clinic in Tampa, funding travel for out-of-state abortions, providing mutual aid, and bailing ‘comrades’ out of jail.”
Then, the report said, the organization said simply, “we just need yall to kill the babies.”
“Some of it is so vile that we cannot show or even describe it here,” the ACLJ said. “But the attempted mockery backfires. Rather than discrediting the pro-life position, these products draw attention to the very reality the abortion industry has spent decades hiding behind euphemisms like ‘choice,’ ‘healthcare,’ and ‘reproductive freedom.’
“They are declarations from people who treat abortion as a political weapon, a cultural identity, and Halloween-season entertainment. ‘Fetuses Fear Me’ and ‘I Don’t Care If Abortion Is Murder’ are not subtle. Neither is ‘kill the babies.’ The point is provocation – but the reality behind the provocation is the death of an unborn child,” the report confirmed.
“That interstate scheme is now at the center of major litigation. Louisiana, Arkansas, and Alabama have filed an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the ‘shield laws’ of New York, Massachusetts, and California – laws intended to protect abortion providers who prescribe and mail abortion drugs into states where that conduct is unlawful,” the report said.
“Abortion is not the healing of a disease or the restoration of a broken body. It intentionally ends one human life for the perceived benefit of another—it destroys and breaks. SWAN’s merchandise and social-media posts do not hide that reality. They mock it, market it, and monetize it.”
Further it is described as directing women to sources for abortion chemicals.
And one sentence stayed with me: “My older sister was proud of me.”
Jim remembered the sister who welcomed him into her home in Tuba City, Arizona, when he was young and needed help. He wrote about differences that had put distance between them, and the closeness they later found again. Beneath the public life and political disagreements was a brother who loved his sister. This week, he lost her.
To Jim, Joe, and the entire Hoft family: Please accept my heartfelt condolences on Lynne’s passing. May God comfort you in the quiet hours when her absence is hardest to bear. May the memories you share bring you warmth, and may you find strength in one another as you grieve. Grieving Is Such Quiet Sorrow…
A loss like this makes me think about the people we keep meaning to call. The sister whose familiar voice we expect to hear again. The friend whose message we put aside because the afternoon got busy. We go about our days with so much left to say, assuming there will be another opportunity.
And sometimes there isn’t…
So, please tell your loved ones that you love them. Tell your extended family, too. Say it on an ordinary afternoon, when nobody is leaving for a long journey and there is no special occasion. Let them hear it while they can still answer you.
“I Love You More Today Than Yesterday,
But Not as Much as Tomorrow.”
What a beautiful thing to give someone to carry through the day.
Jim’s account of finding his way back to his sister also reminds me that an estranged relationship may still have a future. If there is someone you hope to reconnect with, perhaps today is the day to reach out. We cannot know how a conversation will go. But we can always make room for one.
That same care for the people we love also gives me a reason to care deeply about our Country, and why we must vote to preserve it.
THIS IS OUR COUNTRY. We live here with its blessings and its troubles. Our children will make their lives here. The neighbors we wave to, the families we pray for, and the people we will never meet all need a Nation where they can live securely; and build a future.
I love God, and I love America. My faith calls me to consider how I treat people, especially when I am angry or afraid. My love for this Country calls me to take responsibility for the part of its future I can influence.
Both Deserve More Than a Place in Something I Write.
They Deserve a Place in How I Live.
There is enough political noise to fill every hour we have. We can become so absorbed in the latest insult that we lose sight of the lives behind the issues. A school-board decision reaches a child in a classroom. A question about public safety reaches a family coming home at night. Decisions made by people we elect become part of our daily lives.
That is why I keep asking you to VOTE!
So, when you sit down with your ballot:
THINK ABOUT THE PEOPLE whose lives you hope will be better because you took the time.
READ THE CHOICES before you.
BRING YOUR CONSCIENCE and YOUR CONVICTIONS to the task.
Then FOLLOW THROUGH and CAST THAT BALLOT.
Our voices belong in the decisions that shape our communities. Voting is one of the the ways we use them. It is a practical act of care for the country we share and for the generations who will inherit it.
I want our children and grandchildren to know that we cared enough to participate. When they ask what we did with the responsibilities handed to us, I want us to have an answer.
Tonight, call someone you love. You do not need a perfect speech. Tell them they matter to you. Listen to their voice. Give that conversation the time it deserves, and…
Help them make their plan TO VOTE.
And make your own plan TO VOTE, too.
To the Hoft family, my prayers are with you. Your love for Lynne, and hers for you, came through in Jim’s words. Thank you for sharing a little of her life with us.
May we remember to express our love for others, while it can still be heard; and to care for Our Country while its Future is Ours to Help Shape.
A jobless Massachusetts man stands accused of brutally murdering his own mother following a nasty fight over her pets and then bragging to his cousin about his horrific crime.
As CBS Boston reported, prosecutors allege 49-year-old Andria Hanafin was shot and killed by her 22-year-old son, Ryan, the night of October 7 in their Reading home.
He then fled to Vermont, where he was arrested the next day.
Prosecutors say Matthew Hanafin, Ryan’s father, called 911 after arriving home from work around 12:30 a.m. on Oct. 8 and found his wife’s body in the kitchen of their home.
Their 13-year-old son was also inside the home, but was thankfully unharmed.
CBS Boston notes that Ryan Hanafin had an ongoing dispute with Andria Hanafin over the 84 foster cats she kept in the home. On the day of her death, Matthew and Andria spoke during a phone call at around 6:51 p.m., where she told him that she wanted him to move out of the house.
Matthew Hanafin also revealed that he had told his son to “get a job and do something” with his life on the morning before the murder.
The Boston Globe reported that Ryan Hanafin was most recently employed at a gun shop six months ago.
Per CBS Boston, the cats are now in the care of the Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (MSPCA).
After killing his mother, prosecutors say Andria Hanafin sent text messages via Snapchat to his cousin. One read that he “blew madre to pieces.”
The second message he allegedly sent said that he “blew her s**t smooth off.”
Prosecutors revealed that Andria Hanafin had expressed to another friend that she was scared of her son because he had access to firearms.
Investigators later discovered 19 firearms in Ryan Hanafin’s room, including a ghost gun, which led to an untraceable firearm charge.
Ryan Hanafin has been charged with first-degree murder and entered a not-guilty plea on Thursday.
He also faces additional charges for improperly storing firearms near a minor and receiving an untraceable firearm.
The young man is being held without bail for the murder charge.
Crews of moped-riding thieves are terrorizing Mamdani’s NYC.
The crews, which include migrant gang members, are roaming the city streets on mopeds and violently grabbing and tearing jewelry right off the necks of victims.
The Gateway Pundit reported on one such incident. Off-duty NYPD detective Jose Mercedes was brutally attacked during one such attempt in broad daylight.
While Mercedes was clearing out the trunk of his car, two men on an e-bike approached him and reached for his gold chain.
Mercedes fought back and was brutally stabbed at least seven times to the neck and leg. He was taken to an area hospital and, after spending several days recovering, was released.
The accused slasher was identified as 25-year-old D’Angelo Caraballo, and his getaway driver was ID’d as 24-year-old Sneider Mejia.
Fox News’s Bill Melugin reported that the two suspects are both Dominican illegal aliens who were caught and released at the AZ border by the Biden administration. Both have lengthy criminal histories in NYC, including an ignored ICE detainer.
The New York Post reports that the incidents number in the hundreds across the city with ties to the Dominican gang Trinitarios.
“A lot of it has to do with the Trinitarios,” said the officer, referring to the violent street gang founded by Dominican inmates at Rikers Island in the early 1990s that has since grown into a crime empire plaguing the Bronx and upper Manhattan for decades.
“That’s one of their big things, chain snatchings, and two people on a bike doing robberies.”
Unfortunately, even if they are caught, the Post notes, “lefty judges often spring the crooks just as fast.”
And because Mayor Mamdani and New York Governor Kathy Hochul have made it clear they will not cooperate with ICE and put the safety of American citizens first, even if their immigration status is in question, ICE is not informed.
“We’re not allowed to confer with ICE so we just arrest them,” said the cop, who also asked to remain anonymous so he wouldn’t get in trouble. “They get released on their own recognizance [by a judge] and they go back and do it again.”
Let them eat cake! Emanuel Macron and his wife spend their Friday night at a Celine Dion concert as Paris burns.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, the Islamo-Marxist riots in France have completely exploded after weeks of mayhem and are threatening President Emmanuel Macron’s home.
Thousands of violent protesters on Saturday overturned cars, set buildings ablaze, and attacked police across the country. One of the most historic structures in the entire country, the 143-year-old Limoges town hall, has now burned to the ground as the police continued to sit on their hands.
Rioters were also on the verge of reaching Macron’s palace. Just imagine the horror if it were set on fire as well.
On Saturday the Islamo-communist rioters tried to reach Macron’s presidential palace. They were pushing towards the Élysée Palace as their next target.
PROTESTERS IN PARIS are now trying to reach MACRON’S PRESIDENTIAL PALACE
They now attempt to push toward the Élysée Palace, where specialist riot police have been deployed.
Macron spent the day promising to punish those spreading chaos.
@TRobinsonNewEra The Globalist have destroyed France. Macron opened your borders. Just as Obama/Biden opened the border in the USA. On purpose. Look where he is tonight while the great city of Paris burns. Thank God we have President Trump. Fighting the evil of the Globalists Communists. https://t.co/VOuulcquZ8
@TRobinsonNewEra The Globalist have destroyed France. Macron opened your borders. Just as Obama/Biden opened the border in the USA. On purpose. Look where he is tonight while the great city of Paris burns. Thank God we have President Trump. Fighting the evil of the Globalists Communists. https://t.co/VOuulcquZ8
For the record: “Let them eat cake” is an English rendering of the French phrase Qu’ils mangent de la brioche (“Let them eat brioche”), traditionally attributed to Marie Antoinette. It is presented as her supposed reply when told that the peasants had no bread. – via Grok
Former President Barack Obama has broken his silence regarding the raid on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) DC home earlier last week and is currently getting lit up on X with a brutal reminder.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, federal agents raided the Washington, DC-area residence of Omar early Monday morning as part of an ongoing criminal investigation into her immigration paperwork.
The pre-dawn raid was part of an ongoing criminal fraud investigation into the Somali-born congresswoman’s immigration paperwork, documents filled out by her late father when she was a child.
The New York Times exclusively reported on Saturday that federal officials seized the phone of Omar’s Sister, Sahra Noor, earlier this year. When they did so, they noticed that the phone contained damning family text messages.
Investigators then later used these messages to get a federal judge to authorize the raid on Omar’s home.
But Obama was not bothered by any of these facts. Instead, he posted a long screed on X, whining that Trump was targeting Omar because of her political beliefs.
LOOK:
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
X users were quick to note a very interesting irony in Obama’s post. They reminded Obama that he not only spied on Trump’s first presidential campaign, but he also ordered the Russian Hoax to undermine his presidency.
Obama clearly has no shame or leg to stand on when it comes to scolding Trump.
@BarackObama Barack Hussein Obama ORDERED the CIA and FBI make up evidence to target President Trump as “Russian agent”
You should be rotting in a jail cell not making pathetic posts defending a criminal illegal alien. https://t.co/YH1Dhmr3px
I guess Abama forgot how his DOJ targeted Trump before he left the Presidency and how Biden targeted Trump throughout Biden’s Presidency as well. I guess Obama favors people who are now Socialists, steal money in Minnesota from taxpayers and favor a Senate candidate in Michigan whose mother-in-law belonged to the Muslin brotherhood a terrorist organization.
Barack Obama, the man who used the full weight of the intelligence agencies and Justice Department to spy on Donald Trump and push a fabricated Russia hoax in an attempt to undermine his presidency, now wants to lecture everyone about the weaponization of justice. The man is so jealous of Trump he can’t help himself.
@BarackObama didn’t you go after Trump with the Russian hoax using the FBI? and then look at what Joe Biden did during his administration. in the case of Trump he is going after legitimate bad actors are that are working to destroy our country
@BarackObama This comment is rich after you knowingly targeted Trump in 2016. As usual, you jump to a conclusion before the evidence has been presented (Trayvon Martin, Henry Louis Gates).
(@JDHaltigan) 
(@DrewPavlou) 
PROTESTERS IN PARIS are now trying to reach MACRON’S PRESIDENTIAL PALACE
(@TRobinsonNewEra) 
https://t.co/xe4hqpoQq3