WaPo Tries Pitting Donald Against Melania, Completely Misses One Huge Problem

The establishment media have really been scraping the bottom of the barrel this election, in their desperate search for mud to fling at their arch-nemesis Donald Trump.

From the wailing and gnashing of teeth that ensued when Trump’s half-a-billion dollar bond was reduced to $175 million by the New York appellate court, to the pearl clutching over the willful misunderstanding of Trump’s “bloodbath” metaphor, the establishment media types have been tying themselves in knots in their quest to smear Trump’s name.

And now, The Washington Post has increased its contribution to this embarrassing enterprise by trying to manufacture some conflict between Trump and his wife, Melania.

The Post began the attempt right in the title, which alleged that “Trump’s mother-in-law came into the country by a process he derided.”

What exactly did The Post mean by this headline?

Based on an analysis of immigration records released on Monday, The Post was able to track the steps by which Trump’s mother-in-law, Amalija Knavs, who died in January at the age of 78, came into the country.

The Post reported that Knavs was able to enter the country and eventually become a citizen thanks to the family-based process of immigration which, the Post noted, Trump publicly spoke out against and sought to overhaul during the course of his presidency.

Meaning, as The Post explained, according to United States law dating back to 1965, citizens can apply for their parents or minor children to come into the country without a lengthy visa waiting period.

According to the recently released records, Melania Trump did just that for her parents in 1997, and then again when her parents applied for green cards in 2008. Legal permanent residency was granted on March 16, 2010. Knavs and her husband, Viktor, didn’t became U.S. citizens until Aug. 9, 2018.

Clearly, then, what The Post tried to imply was that, had Trump been president in the late 90’s or early 2000’s, then his in-laws could never have become citizens and, therefore, Mr. and Mrs. Trump cannot be in harmony with each other as a result.

What The Post missed, however, was that Trump never had anything against immigration in and of itself..

For one, if Trump and his wife ever clashed over thse issues, they presumably dealt with those issues, and subsequently moved on from them, years ago.

For another, what Trump objected to, as president and as a presidential candidate, were the illegal methods of immigration, and the breakdown of a process that once worked, but now has been abused by bad actors to allow unacceptable levels of chain migration.

Trump, via the RAISE Act, wanted to limit this family sponsorship to spouses and minor children, removing parents from the fast track of sponsorship and instating a system that would prioritize skilled workers.

As The Federalist explained at the time, had this act passed, it would have reformed U.S. immigration to follow similar systems that had been standard in countries like Canada and Australia for years.

The point of the bill was not to eliminate the United States’ immigration processes, but to reform them.

What The Post failed to understand was that Trump, and, indeed, conservatives in general, were actually pro-immigration.

Instead, conservatives’ stance on immigration has been to prioritize those immigrants that would be materially good for the United States, and who would actively benefit American society.

Of course, legitimate asylum requests did not fall under that stipulation, but overall, that is what differentiated the conservative position on immigration from that of the left.

Those on the left have been actively advocating for allowing immigrants who are actively harmful to American society, as the tragic series of murders and assaults of American citizens has sadly demonstrated.

And that was what the Post failed to understand in its weak attempt to pit Trump and his wife against each other.

Conservatives never hated immigration.

What Trump and conservatives hated was illegal immigration.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post WaPo Tries Pitting Donald Against Melania, Completely Misses One Huge Problem appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Diddy’s $40 Million Mansion That Was Raided Has Underwater Tunnel

The Gateway Pundit reported on Monday that Homeland Security agents raided rapper Sean ‘Diddy’ Comb’s $40 million mansion as part of an ongoing sex trafficking investigation.

Combs was notably missing during the raid and was reportedly in Miami when the raid took place.

The Los Angeles Times reported Comb’s mansion, located in Holmby Hills, Los Angeles, measures 17,000 square feet and has a 3,000 square-foot guesthouse.

The outlet also noted Comb’s mansion had an underwater swimming tunnel that connects to a grotto.

 

Diddy’s $40M Los Angeles house has grotto, underwater tunnel and more: Reports https://t.co/wDy1CNbT5a

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) March 28, 2024

Per Fox 5 Atlanta:

Music producer and rapper Sean “Diddy” Combs purchased his swanky $40 million Los Angeles estate in 2014.

Located in the lavish neighborhood of Holmby Hills, the home measures 17,000 square feet and has a 3,000 square-foot guesthouse, according to TMZ.

The European-style villa has a 35-seat theater, a gym, a wine room and even has an underwater swimming tunnel which connects to a grotto, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The mansion is fairly new; built in 2014, it comes with eight bedrooms and 11 bathrooms. There’s also a separate spa house which comes with a steam room, massage room and a beauty salon, TMZ reported.

The Miami Herald reported that federal agents had confiscated electronic devices at Combs’ home and detained his associates while conducting the raid.

In a separate raid in Florida, one of Diddy’s associates, Brendon Paul, who is referred to as Diddy’s “drug mule” in the sex trafficking lawsuit, was arrested by Miami-Dade Police at the Opa-Locka airport on Monday

New bodycam video shows the alleged “drug mule” for hip hop mogul P. Diddy getting arrested Monday at a Miami airport. Former Syracuse basketball player #BrendanPaul was placed into cuffs and faces two felony charges. Paul’s arrest comes after #Diddy’s homes in Los Angeles and… pic.twitter.com/E1Xkmgcn54

— Law&Crime Network (@LawCrimeNetwork) March 28, 2024

Paul was charged with possession of cocaine.

The post Diddy’s $40 Million Mansion That Was Raided Has Underwater Tunnel appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Federal Judge Has Bad News for Hunter Biden, Says There’s Zero Evidence His Charges Are Politically Motivated

There were allegations aplenty at a Wednesday hearing on the federal tax charges against Hunter Biden, but what bothered U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi was the paucity of facts connecting the charges with efforts by congressional Republicans to probe the murky depths of the Biden family’s finances.

Although Scarsi did not make a decision, he signaled in the Los Angeles hearing that defense arguments that the Biden administration’s Justice Department was doing former President Donald Trump’s bidding were not persuasive, according to CNN.

Scarsi, who is dealing with nine motions from Hunter Biden’s attorneys, said he would issue a ruling by April 17, according to The Washington Post.

One motion claiming “selective and vindictive” prosecution appeared to irk the judge.

“One of the big hurdles that this motion has is that it’s not filed with any evidence,” Scarsi said.

He said the facts will win the day, not the politics surrounding the case.

“We are just looking at the facts and law,” the judge said. “All of the aspersions cast off one another just roll off.”

If Scarsi rules against Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son will go to trial in June. There is also the option to make a deal with prosecutors, but the last deal made with Hunter Biden blew up in July in spectacular fashion, lighting off the chain of events that brought his attorneys to court on Wednesday in California.

Biden attorney Abbe Lowell said it was wrong that after prosecutors initially charged the president’s son with misdemeanors in a plea deal that drew outrage from Republicans, he should face three felony charges now as well as six misdemeanors.

Lowell said the tougher charges are proof that special prosecutor David Weiss, who as the U.S. attorney for Delaware led the initial Hunter Biden probe that ended with misdemeanor charges, gave into a public pressure campaign orchestrated by congressional Republicans.

Scarsi asked the attorney for anything more than timing to connect those dots.

“It’s a timeline,” Lowell said. “But it’s a juicy timeline.”

Prosecutor Leo Wise said once the plea deal collapsed, the Justice Department was not bound by its terms.

The hearing also batted about an immunity deal that was part of the initial agreement to settle tax and gun charges against Hunter Biden, which Biden’s lawyers claim should still be in effect.

However, as noted by the New York Post, neither the judge who had to approve the deal nor Delaware Chief U.S. Probation Officer Margaret Bray ever signed the agreement, which former Biden defense attorney Christopher Clark called “null and void.”

Wise said Biden’s team “flipped” its position, not the government.

“There was a good faith belief that Mr. Biden was going to plead guilty,” he said.

Scarsi appeared puzzled by the deal, asking at one point, “Why would he plead guilty if he had immunity?”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The post Federal Judge Has Bad News for Hunter Biden, Says There’s Zero Evidence His Charges Are Politically Motivated appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Trump Reportedly Gave Generous Donation to Foundation That Paid Off Family Mortgage of Slain NYPD Officer Jonathan Diller

On Thursday it was reported that President Trump gave a generous donation to Tunnel to Towers, the foundation that paid off the family mortgage of slain NYPD officer Jonathan Diller.

David Zere reports President Trump paid off the Diller family mortgage pic.twitter.com/fOwEtbVt6x

— Karli Bonne’ (@KarluskaP) March 28, 2024

The Tunnel to Towers Foundation announced a mortgage payoff for the family of Jonathan Diller.

Tunnel to Towers is honored to announce a mortgage payoff for the family of NYPD Officer Jonathan Diller, who was fatally shot and killed during a routine traffic stop on March 25th. Officer Diller is survived by his loving wife, Stephanie, and their one-year-old son. pic.twitter.com/GYXzSlOco4

— Tunnel to Towers Foundation (@Tunnel2Towers) March 28, 2024

Earlier this week Jonathan Diller was killed by a career criminal with 21 previous arrests and 9 felony charges during a routine traffic stop in Queens.

Officer Diller left behind a beautiful wife and a baby boy.

BREAKING: NBC confirms that Trump will be attending the wake for Officer Diller in NYC tomorrow.

Diller was kiIIed by a career criminal with 21 previous arrests and nine felony charges.

Still no comment from Biden or the WH. pic.twitter.com/3YW6hyQ7FL

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 27, 2024

President Trump on Thursday arrived at the wake of slain NYPD officer Jonathan Diller.

WATCH:

BREAKING: Donald Trump arrives at the wake of slain NYPD officer Jonathan Diller while Joe Biden, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton are also in New York, but at a fundraiser with Lizzo pic.twitter.com/tcOaoMNIg1

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) March 28, 2024

Biden was also in New York on Thursday, however, he was too busy attending a ritzy fundraiser with out-of-touch celebrities to make time for a fallen police officer.

Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Bill Clinton are at a $500,000 per ticket fundraiser with Lizzo. A $100,000 ‘donation’ will get you a photo with Biden, Obama, and Clinton by famed photog Annie Leibovitz.

Barack Obama followed feeble Joe Biden down the shorter staircase after they landed in New York City for their day of hobnobbing with celebrities.

WATCH:

HUMILIATING: Obama follows Biden down the short stairs after landing in New York City for their day of ritzy fundraisingpic.twitter.com/uCQJGoadhY

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 28, 2024

The post Trump Reportedly Gave Generous Donation to Foundation That Paid Off Family Mortgage of Slain NYPD Officer Jonathan Diller appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Explosive Whistleblower Revelation: Avenatti’s Alleged Insider Knowledge Could Turn Stormy Daniels Case Upside Down

In a groundbreaking development that could significantly impact the ongoing legal battles and public perception surrounding former President Donald Trump, whistleblower Tony Seruga has come forward with allegations that could reshape the narrative of the Stormy Daniels scandal. Seruga, known for his background in intelligence contracting and a significant following on social media, claims that conservative commentator Michael Avenatti disclosed to him details of an affair between Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels dating back to 2006, along with a hush money scheme aimed at the Trump Organization before the 2016 election.

According to Seruga, Avenatti, who once shared office space with him in Newport Beach, CA, was not just a bystander but an active participant in discussions about the alleged affair and the subsequent financial arrangements made to keep it under wraps. This revelation comes at a time when Trump is preparing to testify in a related trial in New York City, a case he has consistently labeled as baseless and politically motivated.

So Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels had a sexual relationship (both were married at the time BTW) and then concocted an extortion scheme against Donald Trump.
************* pic.twitter.com/W1Wjmn3dWw

— Jason Neptune (@SobrietyCM) March 28, 2024

The whistleblower’s account adds a new layer of complexity to the already convoluted legal saga involving Trump, Avenatti, and Daniels. Seruga’s detailed recounting of his interactions with Avenatti, including the latter’s boastful admissions to various individuals such as ex-NBA star Dennis Rodman, suggests a deeper level of premeditation and manipulation than previously understood.

This information, if verified, could potentially undermine the credibility of the charges against Trump, portraying them as part of a broader attempt by political adversaries to entangle him in legal difficulties. The aim, as suggested by some observers, is to financially and politically cripple Trump, preventing him from mounting a successful political comeback.

.
Today we look at FRAUD and CONSPIRACY

What do Stormy Daniels, Michael Cohen, John Stewart, Joe Biden & Alejandro Mayorkas have in common?

They are all FRAUDULANT*

* allegedly pic.twitter.com/eY0GxFblVT

— Truth Slinger X (@TruthSlingerX) March 28, 2024

The timing of Seruga’s disclosure is particularly noteworthy, given Trump’s imminent court appearance. It raises questions about the motivations behind the legal actions taken against him and whether they are driven by a genuine pursuit of justice or are merely politically charged efforts to diminish his standing.

Moreover, the involvement of high-profile figures like Dennis Rodman in the discussions about the hush money scheme underscores the surreal and complex web of relationships that define this case. It paints a picture of a scandal that extends beyond the legal realm into the domain of celebrity and public spectacle.

As Trump faces continued legal challenges, the revelations brought forth by Seruga could provide him with ammunition to challenge the legitimacy of the accusations against him. They also serve as a reminder of the intricate and often murky interplay between law, politics, and media in shaping public narratives.

In conclusion, the whistleblower’s claims represent a potentially pivotal moment in the ongoing saga surrounding Trump, Avenatti, and Daniels. As the legal and political drama unfolds, the truth of these allegations and their implications for all involved parties remain to be seen. What is clear, however, is that this story is far from over, with potential repercussions that could extend well beyond the courtroom.

The post Explosive Whistleblower Revelation: Avenatti’s Alleged Insider Knowledge Could Turn Stormy Daniels Case Upside Down appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Who’s Behind The Account? Court Claims Trump Attacked Judge Merchan’s Daughter Based on Social Media Account That No Longer Belongs to Her

Far left Judge Juan Manuel Merchan

A spokesperson for the New York Office of Court Administration said President Trump lashed out at Judge Juan Merchan’s daughter based on a social media account that no longer belongs to her.

President Trump on Wednesday said the daughter of the far-left judge who just hit him with a gag order in the Stormy Daniels ‘hush payment’ case posted a photo of him behind bars.

Trump called on NY Judge Juan Merchan to recuse himself after his daughter who represents “Crooked Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Adam “Shifty” Schiff, and other Radical Liberals,” posted a picture of him in jail.

An X account that Trump alleged belonged to Loren Merchan (The Gateway Pundit was unable to confirmed it was her account) posted a photo of Trump behind bars. The photo has since been changed to a picture of Kamala Harris.

Trump’s lawyers previously moved to force Judge Merchan to recuse himself after it was revealed his daughter Loren Merchan worked with the Biden-Harris campaign.

On Wednesday Trump went off on the judge in a series of Truth Social posts and called for him to recuse himself from the case after accusing his daughter of posting a photo of him in jail.

“Judge Juan Merchan, who is suffering from an acute case of Trump Derangement Syndrome (whose daughter represents Crooked Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Adam “Shifty” Schiff, and other Radical Liberals, has just posted a picture of me behind bars, her obvious goal, and makes it completely impossible for me to get a fair trial) has now issued another illegal, un-American, unConstitutional “order,” as he continues to try and take away my Rights. This Judge, by issuing a vicious “Gag Order,” is wrongfully attempting to deprive me of my First Amendment Right to speak out against the Weaponization of Law Enforcement, including the fact that Crooked Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, and their Hacks and Thugs are tracking and following me all across the Country, obsessively trying to persecute me, while everyone knows I have done nothing wrong!” Trump said on Wednesday.

In a bizarre twist, a spokesperson for the court said the X account no longer belongs to Juan Merchan’s daughter.

So who is running the account?

“The X, formerly Twitter, account being attributed to Judge Merchan’s daughter no longer belongs to her since she deleted it approximately a year ago,” state OCA spokesperson Al Baker said in a statement to The Hill on Thursday.

“It is not linked to her email address, nor has she posted under that screenname since she deleted the account,” Baker continued. “Rather, it represents the reconstitution, last April, and manipulation of an account she long ago abandoned.”

According to The Spectator, analysis of the Twitter ID reveals Loren Merchan changed her Twitter name.

“Analysis of the Twitter ID associated with the account shows that Judge Juan Merchan’s daughter Loren’s known Twitter account, that she has used since 2016, had its name changed and was set private at some point last spring,” The Spectator reported.

“The same Twitter ID associated with Loren Merchan’s original Twitter account name, @LorenM426, is now attached to a new name, @LorenM0604, that has a profile picture of Loren Merchan, the same number of followers and posts as the account created in 2016, viewable in archives of the account. It is unclear who runs this account.” The Spectator said.

It is unclear why Loren Merchan changed her Twitter name.

It is also unclear who runs the new X account that used to belong to Loren Merchan.

The post Who’s Behind The Account? Court Claims Trump Attacked Judge Merchan’s Daughter Based on Social Media Account That No Longer Belongs to Her appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Beyond the Headlines with Elijah Schaffer: SHOCKING New Details in Trump and Stormy Daniels Case REVEALED (Video)

Shortly after the 2016 election, one name was constantly on the headlines and in the news – Stormy Daniels. But after raking Trump across the coals for YEARS regarding his alleged dealings with her, is it possible there’s MORE to the story – more that the general population wasn’t told in order to misalign Trump? Elijah Schaffer discusses more on today’s Beyond the Headlines!

The post Beyond the Headlines with Elijah Schaffer: SHOCKING New Details in Trump and Stormy Daniels Case REVEALED (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Speaker Johnson to Deliver Impeachment Articles Against Mayorkas to Senate on April 10

House Speaker Mike Johnson on Thursday notified Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that the House will deliver the articles of impeachment against DHS Chief Alejandro Mayorkas to the Senate on April 10.

“Together with the 11 House impeachment managers, I sent a letter to Senator Schumer telling him we’ll deliver the articles of Secretary Mayorkas’ impeachment to the Senate on April 10th and that he must hold a full trial,” Speaker Johnson said.

“The American people deserve accountability,” he added.

Together with the 11 House impeachment managers, I sent a letter to Senator Schumer telling him we’ll deliver the articles of Secretary Mayorkas’ impeachment to the Senate on April 10th and that he must hold a full trial.

The American people deserve accountability. pic.twitter.com/HHchkcnJO9

— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) March 28, 2024

The American people demanded that Congress hold Mayorkas accountable for violating immigration laws and his oath.

The resolution, H. Res. 863, accused Secretary Mayorkas of high crimes and misdemeanors, setting the stage for a contentious vote in the House of Representatives.

Specifically, the two articles contained in the resolution accuse Mayorkas of “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” in enforcing border policy and “breach of public trust.”

Last month Alejandro Mayorkas was impeached in the House of Representatives by a vote of 214 to 213. Mayorkas was the first cabinet secretary to be impeached in nearly 150 years and the first sitting cabinet secretary in history to be impeached.

More than 11 million illegals – mainly military-age males – have invaded the US on Joe Biden’s open border invitation.

As Mayorkas faced impeachment for overseeing the invasion, he blamed Climate Change for the flood of illegals.

BREAKING: Video from a contact on the ground in Eagle Pass, TX right now shows a mass of thousands of migrants waiting to be processed by Border Patrol after they crossed illegally today. I’ve spent hundreds of days there over the last 2+ years and I’ve never seen it like this. pic.twitter.com/JPNYY7sPxI

— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) December 19, 2023

Instead of protecting the US border and instructing agents to stop the invasion, Mayorkas was too busy warning them to be ‘respectful’ and ask the illegals their preferred pronouns.

The post Speaker Johnson to Deliver Impeachment Articles Against Mayorkas to Senate on April 10 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

CDC Hazmat Containers on Board the Dali! Could the Baltimore Bridge Crash Have been an Attack? (VIDEO)

Investigators are now telling us it could take 24 months to find answers surrounding one of the worst maritime crashes in American History. This is as we learn an elite Coast Guard team is inspecting 13 Centers for Disease Control containers that were on board labeled with the warning “Hazardous Materials.” This raises all kinds of questions. Why is the CDC sending Hazmat containers to Sir Lanka? That is where the Dali was headed when it left the Port of Baltimore before crashing into the Scott Key Francis Bridge.

Investigative Reporter Lara Logan is also sounding the alarm. Her sources insist the crash could have been part of a cyber attack designed to bring the economy to a halt.

Also, the ship’s operator, Synergy Marine, has an in-depth Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion program. DEI is now at the forefront of the culture wars and may be responsible for the increasing transportation safety issues we are seeing across the country.

The post CDC Hazmat Containers on Board the Dali! Could the Baltimore Bridge Crash Have been an Attack? (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Congress Must Pass the Safer Supervision Act

Scrumshus, Wikimedia Commons
This story originally was published by Real Clear WireBy Newt Gingrich
Real Clear Wire

It’s no secret that the American people are more concerned about crime and safety than almost any point in the last 30 years. Headlines are dominated by acts of violence and lawlessness, instilling fear, panic, and anger in the hearts of many hardworking citizens.

The leftwing defund the police battle cry has been totally destructive. However, those of us who really want public safety should not pretend all our policing strategies are perfect.

Our nation’s public safety systems are not immune from the bloat, waste, and ineffectiveness that naturally grows in massive government operations.

The federal supervised release system is a glaring example of such government bloat. Originally conceived as a mechanism to ensure accountability of individuals exiting federal prison – and guide their safe reintegration into society – this system has followed the typical trajectory of government programs. It has ballooned to triple its size over the last quarter-century. It now drains $500 million from taxpayers each year.

Our public safety return on this colossal investment is a system that squanders resources monitoring those who pose no threat – and neglects keeping a close eye on high-risk individuals. It also destabilizes communities and leaves them exposed to crime. In fact, the federal supervised release system doesn’t work for anyone – those under supervision, officers, the economy, or law-abiding citizens.

Hard data supports this disappointing picture. Long supervision sentences often lead to poorer public safety outcomes. This leaves us all more vulnerable. Something must change.

The bipartisan Safer Supervision Act is one solution. This legislation is a crucial step towards reducing the size of government, safeguarding economic freedom, and enhancing public safety – all of which are core conservative principles.

Consider this real-life example from the current broken system. Almost two decades ago, Daniel Lynn Brown was convicted of drug charges. He served 15 years and was released under the First Step Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law. He was placed on 10-year federal supervision, which began in April of 2020.

Nearly four years later, Brown has committed zero violations. He’s also maintained full-time employment as a project manager at a construction company, purchased two homes, and been a devoted father to his five      children.

Yet, Brown remains under federal supervision. He’s not allowed to travel without approval from his probation officer – which has led him to turn down numerous work opportunities, including a “dream job” helping ex-prisoners turn their lives around. Random drug testing and check-ins with his probation officer take him away from work and family obligations. Despite posing no public safety risk, Brown remains trapped in an ever-expanding government bureaucracy.

Browns’ experience flies in the face of basic conservative values. The government exists to keep us safe and protect our rights. Keeping Brown on needless federal supervision does neither. Instead, it wastes our tax dollars and keeps him from reaching his full potential.

Under the Safer Supervision Act, Daniel would have a clear path off of supervision at the halfway point of his term. He would receive guidance on how to request early termination, whether he qualified for presumptive early termination based on his good conduct and compliance, the factors weighed by the court, and the ability to request legal counsel, if needed.

This streamlined process, with clear standards for, or against, early termination, would better safeguard law enforcement resources and reduce wasteful spending – all while incentivizing good behavior, compliance with conditions, and rehabilitation.

Moreover, under the Safer Supervision Act, courts would conduct individualized assessments for each person placed on federal supervision. This would ensure that the government only imposes this sentence when a legitimate public safety interest is served and with conditions that keep communities protected. This would help shift compliance toward a meaningful measure of rehabilitation and success, rather than simply an exercise in arbitrary and complex rule-following.

As President Ronald Reagan said in his 1985 State of the Union address, “Every dollar the federal government does not take from us, every decision it does not make for us will make our economy stronger, our lives more abundant, our future more free.” President Reagan was right then and now. I’d add to his remarks that every dollar we don’t throw away supervising people such as Brown is a dollar that could be spent protecting Americans from real danger.

This is why the Safer Supervision Act has earned the endorsement of the Federal Law Enforcement Officer Association. Unlike Department of Justice bureaucrats, these men and women are focused on protecting crime victims, encouraging rehabilitation, and seeing that people become productive, law-abiding members of society. These officers’ caseloads can sometimes exceed 100 cases per officer – about 50 percent higher than recommended. They know better than anyone how the current system wastes time and resources.

Across the country, conservative leaders have been fighting for commonsense reforms that keep the peace and rein in big government. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed legislation that helped low-risk, nonviolent offenders find paths to rehabilitation. The result was a 29 percent drop in crime and a more than $2 billion-savings in prison costs. Oklahoma and Missouri both shrunk their prison populations by creating similar pathways to redemption for low-risk offenders.

It’s little wonder that conservative leaders at the federal level are champions for the Safer Supervision Act. Congressmen Wesley Hunt, Burgess Owens, and Byron Daniels; Sens. John Cornyn and Mike Lee; and more support this bill.

With a national election on the horizon, passing the Safer Supervision Act would send a clear message: When it comes to keeping Americans safe and cutting government waste, conservatives mean business.

I urge you to contact your Senators and Member of Congress and tell them to pass the Safer Supervision Act.

For more commentary from Newt Gingrich, visit Gingrich360.com. Also, subscribe to the Newt’s World podcast.

The post Congress Must Pass the Safer Supervision Act appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.