Month: June 2024

Credit: MSNBC/ @LibsofTikTok

The mask fell off one far-left Democrat Congresswoman this week while discussing the horrific rape of a 13-year-old girl in New York City by an illegal alien from Ecuador.

As The New York Post reported, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), the Congressional “Progressive” Caucus chairwoman, sat down with MSNBC’s lead clown Joy Reid on Tuesday to discuss illegal immigration into America and Joe Biden’s amnesty of thousands of illegals.

During the discussion, Jayapal and Reid jointly agreed there is “a lot of fear-mongering” over immigration despite the huge crime wave sweeping America, which is partly a result of Biden’s open border policies.

Jayapal then claimed without evidence that she had seen polls showing that Americans still support open immigration while touting her “experience” working on this issue.

“And I think it’s kind of remarkable that the polls I look at, the national polls, actually Americans still support immigrants, they support immigration,” Jayapal said. “It’s just that they would like to see a system that actually works and that can keep them safe and secure.”

“And actually,” Jayapal continued while chuckling, “I’ve been working on this issue for twenty years, since before I came to Congress in the streets as an activist.”

Reid proceeded to play news clips of network coverage of the illegal alien r*pe.

“Let me show you, this is one of the reasons that people have these sort of thinking, this sort of thinking,” Reid said. “Here’s the three cable networks reporting of this. Our banner said, ‘Soon Biden announces legal protections for undocumented spouses of US citizens.’ CNN’s banner said ‘Biden announces new protections for undocumented spouses.’ Here was Fox’s banner: ‘Migrant arrested for raping 13-year-old.’”

“Ha, Yes!” replied a laughing Jayapal.

WATCH:

Jayapal actually laughs as Reid is reading the headline.

Disgusting people. https://t.co/99muPbeYUJ

— Dave Rubin (@RubinReport) June 20, 2024

“I think that’s part of the problem, is that you have a lot of fear-mongering,” Reid said.

An enraged Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) later weighed on the segment, rightfully calling it “utterly sick” and another case of the Democrat elite not caring about Americans suffering under lawless immigration policies.

Joy Reid and Pramila Jayapal laughed at an illegal alien attacking a 13-year-old girl in New York.

This audio is utterly sick.

The Democrat elite do not care that Americans are suffering because of the open border.

They are disgustingly out of touch.https://t.co/5o2vHLoCxA pic.twitter.com/A0rHj6PvcY

— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) June 21, 2024

The Gateway Pundit previously reported an illegal alien from Ecuador has arrested in New York City for a horrific sexual assault on an innocent 13-year-old girl last week at a Queens park.

The attacker, later identified by police as 25-year-old Christian Geovanny Inga-Landi, grabbed the child and her male friend, who were walking home from school through Kissena Park in Flushing Meadows. He proceeded to force them into an isolated area at roughly 3:30 p.m. last Thursday.

He tied the two children by the wrists with a shoelace and then r*ped the little girl. Following the sexual assault, he allegedly stole the kids’ cell phones, told them not to do anything for 20 minutes, and ran away like the coward he is.

The New York Post then obtained video footage and photos that show Inga-Landi cowering in fear on the sidewalk early Tuesday as an angry mob beat the tar out of him and calls him “a rapist.”

Inga-Landi faces multiple charges, including rape, kidnapping and sex abuse.

The post DISGUSTING: Radical-Left Democrat Congresswoman Laughs at News Coverage of Illegal Alien Who R*ped Innocent Teen Girl in NYC (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

From left: Special Counsel Jack Smith, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon and former President Donald Trump. (@axios / X screen shot)

Judge Aileen Cannon on Friday heard challenges to Jack Smith’s special counsel appointment.

Cannon did not issue a ruling after the hearing concluded.

President Trump previously filed a motion to dismiss Jack Smith’s classified documents charges based on the “unlawful appointment and funding of Special Counsel.”

Day one of the expanded evidentiary hearing was held on Friday.

According to NBC News, President Trump’s lawyers “argued that an officer like the special counsel must be appointed “by law” and that the special counsel should be categorized as a “principal officer” and subject to Senate confirmation. The statutory text cited by the special counsel’s office “does not authorize” the U.S. attorney general’s appointment of the special counsel, his lawyer, Emil Bove, argued.”

Cannon appeared skeptical of Trump’s legal team’s argument that a special counsel is a “principal officer.” The defense argued that giving an attorney general power to appoint a special counsel with the authority of a US Attorney is akin to a shadow government (since only a US president can appoint a US Attorney and the Senate must confirm).

“That sounds very ominous, a shadow government. But what does that mean?” Cannon asked, according to NBC News.

Notes from an excruciating Trump classified docs hearing in Ft Pierce on Appointment of Special Counsel:

— Judge Cannon seemed skeptical of Trump motion asking her to rule that SC is a “principal officer” and unlawfully appointed

— Trump position seemed to rest heavily on AG…

— Hugo Lowell (@hugolowell) June 21, 2024

However, Cannon did question whether Attorney General Merrick had any oversight role in seeking the indictment against Trump.

Jack Smith’s prosecutor James Pearce refused to answer and claimed it would be against policy to answer the question.

“Why would there be any heartburn to answer whether the attorney general signed off on the indictment?” Cannon asked.

“Before court adjourned, Cannon asked prosecutors and the defense to file any supplemental materials, including statutory citations and case law, in filings with a maximum of five pages.” NBC News reported.

Judge Cannon seemed more amenable to SC argument and the amicus that SC is “inferior officer”

— AG can remove SC at any time and has authority to override SC decisions, so SC is inferior officer

— 28 USC 533 explicitly says AG can appoint people to prosecute crimes against the…

— Hugo Lowell (@hugolowell) June 21, 2024

Judge Cannon last month indefinitely postponed the classified documents case after Special Counsel Jack Smith admitted to tampering with evidence.

The Judge vacated the May 20, 2024 trial date. It may be several months until Judge Cannon sets a new trial date.

Jack Smith admitted the FBI messed with the boxes containing “classified” documents they seized from Trump and can’t be sure the order or the placement of the documents.

The DOJ previously assured the Court that the placement of classified documents as originally found had been maintained – THEY LIED!

The DOJ in August 2022 lied to the Court when they claimed the red, blue and yellow sheets shown in the viral photo of the classified documents indicated their classification status.

The post Judge Cannon Holds Hearing on Validity of Jack Smith’s Special Counsel Appointment – Here Are the Details appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said last week that she will bring force an inherent contempt vote to the House floor after the DOJ declined to prosecute US Attorney General Merrick Garland.

“Under inherent contempt proceedings, the House or Senate has its Sergeant-At-Arms, or deputy, take a person into custody for proceedings to be held in Congress,” according to the National Constitution Center.

The Justice Department won’t prosecute Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress over the Biden audio tapes.

In a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday, the department said, “The department has determined that the responses by Attorney General Garland to the subpoenas issued by the committees did not constitute a crime, and accordingly the department will not bring the congressional contempt citation before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute the Attorney General.”

“The DOJ is not above the law. Garland is not above the law. Inherent contempt will be called up and brought to the floor,” Anna Paulina Luna said.

“I already filed the resolution and I will be calling up the vote,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said on Friday afternoon.

Senior Congressional Correspondent for Fox News Chard Pergram wrote, “Fox is told that Democrats would likely move to table or kill the resolution to hold Garland in “inherent contempt.” Thus, the vote is one step removed from an actual up/down vote on inherent contempt. If the House moves to the table, the issue is dead. However, if the House rejects tabling the measure, it proceeds to hold a vote on actual inherent contempt. Fox is told that Garland has reached out to moderate Republicans, pushing them to reject inherent contempt.”

2) The last time Congress used its inherent contempt powers, it held a Commerce Department official who refused to cooperate at the Willard Hotel in Washington for ten days in 1934.

Fox is told that Democrats would likely move to table or kill the resolution to hold Garland in…

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) June 21, 2024

In a series of explosive posts, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has launched a scathing attack on Attorney General Merrick Garland.

Reports are emerging that Garland is personally reaching out to moderate Republicans, urging them to vote against holding him in ‘inherent contempt.’

Rep. Luna wrote:

“It’s being reported Garland is CALLING moderate Republicans asking them to vote against holding him in inherent contempt. Garland, you can make this all go away by handing over the tapes. You’re willfully ignoring congressional issued subpoenas…

Garland is now calling Republican members of congress pressuring them to NOT vote for inherent contempt. This is the definition of corruption. He thinks he is above the law and can tell members of congress what to do.

Why is Garland fighting so hard to hide the tapes? What is on the tapes that is causing him to behave in criminal fashion in an effort to protect Biden? Any other American would be in jail for doing what he is doing.

Garland, release the tapes to Congress and allow us to listen to them.

Garland, why don’t you give me call as well. You should have my cell phone number. I’d like to hear your pitch on why you think you should not be held accountable?”

The post “This is the Definition of Corruption” — AG Merrick Garland is Now Calling GOP Lawmakers, Coercing Them Not to Vote for ‘Inherent Contempt’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Arizona Senate candidate and Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb recently appeared on Spanish language network Univision and told the host that he has “seen no evidence” that the 2020 and 2022 elections in Arizona were stolen from Trump and Kari Lake.

Previously, in a February 2023 Congressional Homeland Security Committee Hearing, Lamb said Trump lost his election, and he has “seen zero evidence” that election fraud had an impact on the 2020 election in Arizona — even after Kari Lake’s rigged election, in which the primary election was wrought with irregularities and 60% of machines failed in the general election.

This time, Lamb clarified that he has not seen any evidence of this fraud, “at least not in my county.”

However, in Mark Lamb’s County’s 2022 primary election, they ran out of Republican ballots at polling locations and turned voters away from the polls. Prior to this, Pinal sent 63,000 erroneous ballots to voters leading up to the August 2nd Primary Election.

Then, after the 2022 General Election, Virginia Ross–who had previously resigned from her role as County Recorder to be appointed as Elections Director after the sham 2022 Primary Election–fled the state after she collected a $25,000 bonus for running a clean election. However, it was later discovered that a significant miscount impacted the results of the race, which was hidden from the judge in Abe Hamadeh’s lawsuit to overturn the election. Hamadeh allegedly lost his election for Attorney General by 280 votes.

Additionally, Pinal County Attorney Ken Volkner–who came under fire for his role in suppressing evidence that Pinal County had not counted hundreds of ballots favoring Republican candidates–also reportedly hired far-left law firm Coppersmith & Brockelman PLC to perform an analysis of the 2022 primary election after the county ran out of ballots. Coppersmith & Brockelman PLC is the same law firm that represented Katie Hobbs as Secretary of State in lawsuits challenging the 2022 elections and later seemingly played a role in funneling dark money to Katie Hobbs’ inaugural 501(c)(4) nonprofit. Hobbs is now under investigation by multiple Arizona law enforcement agencies after reportedly receiving $400,000 from a group home company, which later made millions in return after being awarded Department of Child Safety contracts.

The Gateway Pundit recently outlined in a report that Kari Lake is leading by a landslide in the polls for Arizona’s Senate seat. However, things may turn sour once again for the Trump-Endorsed candidate, who almost lost the 2022 primary to mass voter disenfranchisement and potential fraud, namely in Mark Lamb’s Pinal County.

EXCLUSIVE: Poll Shows Kari Lake DOMINATING in GOP U.S. Senate Primary but Will Arizona’s Rigged Elections Favor Mark Lamb Who Has “Seen Zero Evidence” of Election Fraud? (VIDEO)

While interviewing on Spanish language network Univision, Lamb told the host that he has “seen no evidence” that the 2020 and 2022 elections in Arizona were stolen from Trump and Kari Lake.

With these statements and previous ones by Mark Lamb, who saw shady election irregularities and illegalities in his own county, many could be worried that the fix is in despite Lake leading by a whopping 30 or more points in recent polls. How can we trust a law enforcement official who has done nothing to fight election fraud in his own county and won’t even admit the issues?

Lamb posted the interview to his YouTube page late last month.

Watch below:

Host: Does Mark Lamb Trust in the apparatus for elections?

Lamb: I trust.

Host: In your perspective, the election was stolen from Kari Lake and Donald Trump?

Lamb: Well, I have seen no evidence of that, at least not in my county.

The post WATCH: “Not In My County” – Kari Lake’s Senate Primary Opponent Mark Lamb Ignores Fraud in His County, Says He Has “Seen No Evidence” That Elections Were Rigged Against Donald Trump and Kari Lake appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe Biden is currently hiding at Camp David and doing debate prep.

President Trump and Joe Biden will face off in the first presidential debate next Thursday. The debate will be hosted by CNN in Atlanta.

The microphones will be muted except when it is the candidate’s ‘turn’ to speak.

Campaign staff may not interact with the candidates during breaks and no props are allowed.

The bar is set so low for feeble Biden that all he has to do is show up and not keel over and he will be applauded.

According to ABC News, part of Biden’s “debate prep” includes rehearsing standing for 90 minutes (and doping).

He’s completely shot.

WATCH:

Part of Biden’s “debate prep” includes rehearsing standing for 90 straight minutes (in addition to getting juiced) pic.twitter.com/tLJ0BpD5uT

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 21, 2024

Standing for 90 minutes?

Biden can barely walk!

On Thursday evening Joe Biden arrived at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Catoctin Mountain Park in Maryland where he will be hiding and doped up until next week’s presidential debate.

Biden’s stiffened gait alarmed the public. He staggered and swayed as he made his way to Marine One en route to Camp David.

WATCH:

Biden arrives at Camp David, where he’ll be holed away — and heavily doped up — ahead of the debate.

He has zero public events on his schedule until Thursday. pic.twitter.com/3C3iCuZOzg

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 21, 2024

The post HE’S SHOT: Joe Biden’s “Debate Prep” Includes Rehearsing Standing For 90 Minutes Straight appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the constitutional challenge to a federal law banning gun possession by a citizen who has a domestic violence restraining order. The vote on case United States vs. Rahimi was 8-1, only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. The decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts.

You can read the decision here.

A ‘restraining order’ in most courts in most states is very easy to obtain. To obtain a ‘restraining order’, generally a person seeking one needs to show either a specific instance or instances of abuse or harassment such as sexual assault or just a threat of further abusive behavior or harassment.

In law these are crimes where simple words, and importantly the impressions of other people, can generate criminal charges. Before an accused person ever has a trial, they can lose their gun rights because of an accusation where the only evidence is an angry ex-spouse’s words and recollections.

To prove this kind of evidence in court, most jurisdictions allow people to simply tell the judge their side of the story. Personal testimony, eyewitness testimony, a police report, medical records, photographs, all suffice as evidence in a hearing where the judge determines whether or not a person is a threat to another.

Over the past few decades, as well, feminists have greatly changed the definition of what constitutes ‘domestic violence.’

Here is how the Department of Justice currently defines “Domestic Violence”:

Domestic violence is a pattern of abusive behavior in any relationship that is used by one partner to gain or maintain power and control over another intimate partner. Domestic violence can be physical, sexual, emotional, economic, psychological, or technological actions or threats of actions or other patterns of coercive behavior that influence another person within an intimate partner relationship. This includes any behaviors that intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, blame, hurt, injure, or wound someone.

Even the mildest criticisms of this expansive definition of domestic violence are aggressively tone policed by the mainstream media. In February, one sign at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which listed an expansive list of domestic violence as negatively impacting families, was covered by Newsweek.

At CPAC: a billboard decrying “Nuking the nuclear family.” It criticizes
“Overly broad definitions of domestic violence”
“Restraining orders without evidence of abuse”
“False allegations”
“Presumption of guilt”
“Ignoring that domestic violence is an equal opportunity problem” pic.twitter.com/PUjMIL6IfU

— Eric Michael Garcia (@EricMGarcia) February 23, 2024

The challenge to the federal law in the Rahimi case, found at 18 U. S. C. §922(g)(8), asked whether the federal law in question “fits within our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

The plaintiff is Zackey Rahimi, a citizen of Texas.

Plaintiff Zackey Rahimi

Rahimi was subject to a domestic violence order after an altercation with a girlfriend in a parking lot where the girlfriend alleges he fired off a shot, either at her or at a witness nearby. The girlfriend filed for a restraining order and alleged that he was mean to her many times in the past. The restraining order was granted for a term of two years, where he was not to contact the girlfriend and was not allowed to own or possess guns during this period of time.

Later, after the police investigated claims that he violated the restraining order, they searched his home and found the guns which were prohibited by the restraining order.

Not a single Trump-appointed or Bush Jr.-appointed Supreme Court Justice sided with the gun rights of Plaintiff Rahimi. Clarence Thomas was the lone dissent.

Justice Thomas said in dissent: “Not a single historical regulation justifies the statute at issue.”

Thomas noted the massive due process violations at stake, and disproportionate penalties in the law when he said the federal law, “strips an individual of his ability to possess firearms and ammunition without any due process. Rather, the ban is an automatic, uncontestable consequence of certain orders. There is no hearing or opportunity to be heard on the statute’s applicability, and a court need not decide whether a person should be disarmed under §922(g)(8).”

Thomas continued, “The only process §922(g)(8) requires is that provided (or not) for the underlying restraining order. Despite §922(g)(8)’s broad scope and lack of process, it carries strong penalties. Any violation of §922(g)(8) is a felony punishable by up to 15 years’ imprisonment. And, a conviction for violating §922(g)(8) itself triggers a permanent, life-long prohibition on possessing firearms and ammunition. §922(g)(1).”

Thomas prophetically says, when referencing the ability of courts to suspend the gun rights of people simply accused of domestic violence, “in the interest of ensuring the Government can regulate one subset of society, today’s decision puts at risk the Second Amendment rights of many more.”

The post Supreme Court 8-1: Citizens Lose All Gun Rights for 2 Years When Accused of Domestic Violence appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

CBS News did a segment that purported to show a “cheap fake” video that was supposedly manipulated to make President Joe Biden look bad, but the two clips were virtually identical. (@DontWalkRUN / X screenshot)

President Trump, in a Thursday Instagram post, trolled the Biden Regime’s propaganda arm for claiming that authentic videos of Biden breaking down mentally in public were nefariously edited or AI-created “cheap fakes” to make him look bad.

The controversy centers around viral video clips, one showing Biden being led offstage by Barack Obama after freezing up at a Democratic fundraiser.

Additionally, Joe Biden had a disastrous trip to the G7 Summit in Europe last week, where he wandered off confusedly during parachuting displays with world leaders and head-bumped Pope Francis.

Trump’s meme defines a “cheap fake” as “any unedited video of Joe Biden’s cognitive decline that the Biden administration does not want the public to see”:

Via @realdonaldtrump on Instagram:

As The Gateway Pundit reported, during a press conference, DEI White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre lashed out at conservative media outlets for circulating videos of Biden being pulled off the stage by his handler-in-chief, Barack Obama. She described the unedited clips as “a cheap fake video done in bad faith.”

Karine Jean-Pierre Furious as Unedited Clips of Biden Freezing Up and Being Led Offstage by Obama Spread Like Wildfire Online — Calling it a ‘Cheap Fake Video Done in Bad Faith’ (VIDEO)

White House Senior Deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates defended Biden on Sunday in comments that attacked the New York Post and other conservative websites for their reporting on the incident.

“Fresh off being fact checked by at least 6 mainstream outlets for lying about @POTUS with cheap fakes, Rupert Murdoch’s sad little super pac, the New York Post, is back to disrespecting it’s readers & itself once again. Their ethical standards could deal with a little unfreezing,” he wrote.

“By pretending the President taking in an applauding crowd for a few seconds is somehow wrong, all they’re really admitting is – once again – is they can’t take on the leadership that’s fueling the strongest economic growth in the world & bringing violent crime to a 50 year low.”

Fresh off of numerous embarrassing videos of Biden circulating and going viral, Biden will be hiding and doped up until next week’s presidential debate hosted by CNN in Atlanta, The Gateway Pundit reported earlier.

President Trump has called for Biden to take a drug test before the debate. However, the White House has refused to confirm or deny whether or not Joe Biden plans to use drugs to enhance his debate performance.

The post EPIC: President Trump Trolls White House “Cheap Fake” Narrative With Hilarious Meme appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Screenshot

A 36-year-old tourist was brutally lynched and his body set on fire by an enraged mob in Madyan, a town in Pakistan’s northwestern province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The incident, as reported by Al Jazeera, occurred following allegations that the man had desecrated the Quran, Islam’s holy book.

According to Swat police officials, the man was accused of “insulting the Quran.” The specifics of his alleged actions remain unclear.

“Our police team reached the main market in Madyan to arrest the man and took him to the police station, but the crowd demanded to have him handed over,” a police official told Al Jazeera.

The situation escalated when hundreds gathered outside the Madyan police station where the man was held. The mob attacked the premises, dragged out the man, and killed him.

A police source at central Swat police headquarters stated that the man had been “tortured to death”.

A horrifying video on social media shows a large crowd chanting religious slogans around a burning body.

WATCH: (GRAPHIC: Viewer discretion is advised.)

Man accused of blasphemy burnt alive by Pakistani Muslims. #Pakistan is a medieval retarded terrorist country. pic.twitter.com/9KjV9Iq7GY

— Geert Wilders (@geertwilderspvv) June 21, 2024

Pakistani Muslim Mob BURN TOURIST ALIVE for committing ‘blasphemy’ against Islam.

The man was lynched by a several hundred strong group in the Swat region of Pakistan, with the mob accusing the man of desecration of the Holy Book after he allegedly burnt several pages.

The… pic.twitter.com/NufWXKK653

— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) June 21, 2024

CTV reported:

The suspect, identified as Mohammad Ismail, was a tourist from the eastern Punjab province and was staying at a hotel in the town when a mob accused him of burning pages from the Quran.

Khan said Ismail was being questioned by police when the mob attacked the police station and clashed with officers. The mob later snatched Ismail, killed him and burned his body, he said.

Police have not yet arrested any of the attackers, Khan said.

Blasphemy accusations are common in Pakistan. Under the country’s blasphemy laws, anyone found guilty of insulting Islam or Islamic religious figures can be sentenced to death. While authorities have yet to carry out a death sentence for blasphemy, accusations can cause riots and incite mobs to violence.

Last month, a mob in Pakistan’s eastern Punjab province attacked a 72-year-old Christian man after accusing him of desecrating pages of the Quran. He later died at a hospital.

The post HORROR: Pakistani Muslim Mob Lynches and Burns Tourist Alive Over Allegations of Desecrating Islam’s Holy Book appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Biden pokes black voter

Few cities have enjoyed the amount of attention and questionable favoritism from Joe Biden quite like Milwaukee. His pandering began almost immediately: Biden chose Milwaukee for his first official presidential trip to promote his controversial Covid relief plan.

This wasn’t a one-time fluke. Biden returned last December and again in March, shortly after securing the 2024 Democratic nomination. And unlike his usual quick exits, Biden didn’t rush back to the White House; he stayed overnight in the city’s lavish Pfister Hotel.

Biden’s repeated trips to Milwaukee reveal a clear agenda—courting key swing states while neglecting broader national issues. This pattern highlights where his true priorities lie: not with the American people, but with partisan politics and cozying up to strategic urban centers.

Politico reports,

In fact, his administration always seems to have a presence here: Vice President Kamala Harris, Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison and a handful of Cabinet officials have also visited Wisconsin’s largest city just since the start of the year, promoting various initiatives or federal dollars directed its way.

The only problem is, Milwaukee isn’t returning the affection — not even close — and that could be a big problem for Biden. Polls suggest the president is trailing his 2020 performance in the city and surrounding county. In Wisconsin’s April Democratic primary, his performance within the city limits lagged well behind the rest of the state.

The threat is in plain sight on the North Side, amid the theatrical black walls and candy red barber chairs of Zoe’s Barber Elite & Beauty Salon. The barbershop was recently selected for a pilot program by the voter advocacy group Black Men Vote, largely because it is located in one of the majority Black precincts that’s seen voter participation deteriorate from the sky-high levels of the Obama era when Black voter participation surged in Milwaukee to 70 percent in 2008 and then 77 percent in 2012.

The idea is for barbers like Lorenzo Davis, the owner, to serve as ambassadors for voting in their communities, to help reverse what the group sees as the disengagement of Black men from the electoral process.

Davis, for his part, appears to be sold on Trump. “He’s about business,” Davis said to me when I asked who he planned to vote for in 2024. “I agree with him that we should have more American-made products.”

Erin Schaff / The New York Times via Redux

There’s an obvious reason behind Joe Biden’s excessive Milwaukee visits: Black voters.

This influential group can determine if Wisconsin stays blue or flips red this fall. Yet, their serious doubts about Biden’s broken promises raised concerns about his campaign.

Despite Milwaukee’s Democratic leanings, Biden faces a real danger—a lackluster turnout among Black voters here could cost him this crucial swing state and jeopardize his entire reelection bid.

Biden’s desperate attempts to court this voting bloc reveal his increasing electoral risks.

The post 2024 Could Be Decided By Black Voters in Milwaukee — It’s Not Looking Good For Biden appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Joe Biden is not having an easy time on social media lately. In a message posted on Thursday, the 20th, on X, formerly known as Twitter, Biden recalled the January 6, 2020 attacks on the Capitol and mentioned the upcoming elections.

Biden also spoke about President Donald Trump, in an attempt to link the Republican to the January 6th attacks.

In a shallow and somewhat senseless message, Biden wrote:

“We’re approaching the first presidential election since the January 6 insurrection.

We know who Donald Trump is.

The question we have to answer is: Who are we? That’s what’s at stake.”

 

We’re approaching the first presidential election since the January 6 insurrection.

We know who Donald Trump is.

The question we have to answer is: Who are we? That’s what’s at stake.

— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) June 20, 2024

 

Several users mocked Biden’s tweet in the replies. A user named Greg responded:

I am Greg.

I am greg.

— greg (@greg16676935420) June 20, 2024

Another user refuted Biden’s insinuation by suggesting that President Trump was not responsible for the insurrection.

Do you mean that “insurrection” where Donald Trump told everyone to be peaceful?

You mean that “insurrection” where Donald Trump told everyone to go be peaceful?

— Planet Of Memes (@PlanetOfMemes) June 20, 2024

Reporter Jennifer Lynn Lawrence was even more emphatic in her opinion, recalling the Democrats’ scheme in the 2020 elections:

You and the democrats are the ones who planned & who are behind what happened at the Capitol and we have the receipts to prove it. Then tried to pin it on “MAGA” to fortify the election you stole in Nov of 2020.

You and the democrats are the ones who planned & who are behind what happened at the Capitol and we have the receipts to prove it. Then tried to pin it on “MAGA” to fortify the election you stole in Nov of 2020. @JoeBiden

— Jennifer Lynn Lawrence (@JenLawrence21) June 20, 2024

Another user sarcastically responded to Biden’s message, believing it to be the first one posted by Joe.

“This is the first tweet on this account I might actually believe is from Joe Biden, since they don’t seem to know who they are.”

This is the first tweet on this account I might actually believe is from Joe Biden, since they don’t seem to know who they are.

— Greg J. Marchand MD (@MarchandSurgery) June 21, 2024

While President Trump’s campaign thrives with increasing support from the American public, Biden seems more and more lost in himself – and on his social media, as well.

The post HAHA! Biden’s Weak Jab at Trump Backfires Hilariously on Social Media appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.