The Democrats Cannot Afford to Lose in November

The Democrats Cannot Afford to Lose in November

But nobody believes they can win.

(The Sturdy Table/Shutterstock)

The Democrats may be in a dilemma, and we can only speculate about how they’ll deal with it. Only a clone of Jake Tapper or Joy Reid wouldn’t notice that Joe Biden is in an advanced state of dementia and may not be able to win in November if his support continues to erode. It may also be hard for the DNC to get a replacement for their floundering incumbent so late in the contest, even if Joe and Jill agree to depart. The Democrats will need a pinch hitter who can hit a homer. Their only credible candidate may be Michelle Obama, who doesn’t seem eager to run and whose victory even if she entered the fray is hardly assured. 

Unfortunately, the Democrats also can’t afford to lose. They have too much at stake in this hotly fought race to allow Trump to take back the presidency. Here I’m speaking not so much about their nutty woke projects and Green Energy schemes. Even more importantly, the Dems are fighting to hold on to their empire. At least since Obama politicized the federal administration from the left and made entire departments of government subservient to his ideology and the DNP, the Dems have been engaging in some very nasty politics. 

This includes among other activities that will likely come under scrutiny the present lawfare against Trump, the dubious FISA warrant issued to spy on the other party in 2016, the dehumanizing treatment of Trump’s former staff members, the truly brutal punishment meted out to the J6ers, the FBI’s possible complicity in the occupation of the Capitol buildings on January 6, Democratic support for criminal actors during the “Summer of Love” following the death of George Floyd, and the Biden family’s money laundering activities.

It’s not that Trump, pace the MSM, has been eager to carry out a revenge tour. He has said very little on this subject, unless goaded, and usually assures his listener that “my success will be my best revenge.” But the media and those they serve know something unpleasant may be coming unless the Dems can prevail in the fall. Furthermore, if the Republicans win Congress together with the presidency, it seems unlikely that massive investigations of the preceding Democratic administration and its partisans in the government won’t be taking place. And as much as the media may try to protect the besieged Left, some of the revelations that surface will stick to their targets. Moreover, those who have betrayed public trust by working for the Democrats in a highly partisan manner will likely be removed; the Obama-Biden party will lose many of the staffing gains they have achieved in the last 16 years.

It’s unlikely the Dems will allow any of this to happen without first pulling out all stops. They will do everything possible to rig the election in their favor, including the granting of citizenship to illegals, where possible, and arranging to allow other illegals to vote by removing all election integrity safeguards. We may also expect to see drop boxes filled with lots of questionable ballots and Democratic lawyers and their media advocates defending them as valid votes.  

There may also be the (predictable) black swan, perhaps a widely announced media report that Trump attends neo-Nazi gatherings or was once heard making disparaging remarks about some racial minority. Like the Russia collusion charge, this fabrication can be pushed up until the November election, and leftist organizations like the SPLC and the ADL can be enlisted to confirm it. It also wouldn’t surprise me if some Democratic prosecutor in a heavily Democratic district didn’t accuse Trump of some new “felony,” a criminal allegation manufactured for the occasion like the one devised against Trump in New York City. Anything that diverts attention from Biden’s advanced senility and less than inspiring record as chief executive will do.

The problem, as Greg Gutfeld noted, is that no one but very partisan Democrats would believe Biden actually won, no matter how well-engineered the trickery. A certain implausibility would be attached to his victory, and at least half the country would reject the election results. That may be the Catch-22 situation in which the Dems now find themselves. They are stuck with a disastrously poor candidate, who can’t run on real issues, like border security, energy costs, controlling crime, and halting inflation. Unfortunately, he seems to have caused lots of things to become a lot worse since he took office. 

Biden is also unable to communicate coherently and wanders around in obvious confusion unless someone helps him on and off platforms. That such a pathetic figure, who either mumbles helplessly as he tries to read from his teleprompter or tells obvious, embarrassing lies in interviews, can win a presidential race is itself suspect. That he can win against a vigorous opponent who showed far greater competency in the same office will look mighty strange. There’s no way the Dems would be able to deal with this credibility gap. But the last thing they can afford to do is lose the presidential race.   

The post The Democrats Cannot Afford to Lose in November appeared first on The American Conservative.

NATO Must Make a Nuclear Deal With Russia

NATO Must Make a Nuclear Deal With Russia

The specter of nuclear war is closer than ever in the Ukraine conflict.


Credit: Mil.gov.ua

NATO’s 75th anniversary might seem to some like a good opportunity for the alliance to double down on its core mission: deterring and, if necessary, defending member states from Russian aggression. But increasing defense capabilities alone isn’t enough to reduce the risk of conflict with Russia. NATO, and especially the United States, should consider negotiations with Russia to reduce the dangerous nuclear risks that have been exacerbated by the Ukraine conflict.

This task is particularly salient with the recent addition of Finland and Sweden to NATO—two countries in Russia’s vicinity that abandoned neutrality for the U.S. security umbrella, which now runs from the High North to the Black Sea. Moscow will have to rely even more on its nuclear arsenal to compensate for conventional military inferiority relative to NATO. Nuclear weapons will feature prominently in future crises as a coercive tool to convince adversaries to settle disputes on Moscow’s terms. Indeed, Russian nuclear threats have, so far, successfully deterred NATO from directly intervening in Ukraine. They have given Russia a competitive risk-taking advantage in a conflict where its interests are inherently greater than those of NATO and the U.S.

Russia’s nonstrategic, or “tactical,” nuclear weapons provide its political leadership with flexible and discriminate strike options, such as sea- and air-launched cruise missiles, short-range ballistic missiles, and gravity bombs. According to the latest assessment from the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), Russia’s nuclear arsenal includes more than 1,500 nonstrategic warheads that can be delivered by air, land, and sea platforms, almost all of which are dual-capable. Though these warheads are kept in storage, the FAS assessment noted that “many regional storage sites are located relatively close to their launcher garrisons and in practice warheads could be transferred to their launch units on short notice.”

With significantly lower yields than strategic warheads, Russia could conduct a “limited” nuclear strike that leaves room for further escalation unless its opponent settles on terms acceptable to Moscow. Options for a limited strike include attacking Ukrainian military logistics hubs, concentrated defensive positions, or military-industrial facilities. Another low-yield “nuclear shock” option available to the Russian political leadership is a demonstration test—a measure that multiple high-profile Russian analysts have argued will stop NATO from further escalating the war.

Russia’s nuclear threats should not be dismissed as empty signaling. The Russian Defense Ministry has held several exercises with its strategic nuclear forces since the war began. For the first time last month, Russia announced it was conducting drills for “the preparation and use of non-strategic nuclear weapons” with Kinzhal and Iskander missiles in the Southern Military District bordering Ukraine. Both missile systems have been used extensively in Ukraine with increasing lethality. Notably, Russian officials said the latest drill was a response to statements from France’s President Emmanuel Macron and the United Kingdom’s Foreign Minister David Cameron that NATO forces might intervene if Ukrainian lines collapse, and Ukraine could use British-supplied weapons to strike targets in Russia.

The drills aren’t for show. They reinforce the combat credibility of Russia’s nuclear forces by serving as a concrete reminder that it can execute tactical strikes. Consider that the United States routinely tests its nuclear forces for the same reason: “to demonstrate the readiness of U.S. nuclear forces and provide confidence in the lethality and effectiveness of the nation’s nuclear deterrent.”

Another worrying sign that the Ukraine conflict has worsened nuclear security in Europe was the deployment of dozens of tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus in March. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Belarusian officials have framed the deployment as a response to NATO’s military buildup in Eastern Europe. In tandem with Russia’s tactical nuclear exercise, last month Belarus held drills involving Iskander missiles and dual-capable fighter jets.

Analysts correctly point out that Belarus’s hosting of nuclear weapons doesn’t increase the material threat to NATO since the missiles and bombs deployed there could still hit allied territory if launched from Kaliningrad or Russia proper. But the option to launch an attack from Belarus provides the Russian political leadership with more flexibility on the escalation ladder. For instance, if NATO intervened directly, Moscow could launch a limited attack against Ukraine using nuclear weapons based in Belarus. Since the attack originated from Belarus this would lower the risk of a retaliatory NATO strike against Russia that would surely lead to a more violent nuclear response.

Russia’s increased reliance on nuclear weapons won’t change with a political settlement in Ukraine; NATO will remain a conventionally superior opponent. But the Russia–Ukraine war is the most likely reason nuclear weapons could be used in Europe, a prospect that President Joe Biden equated with the Cuban Missile Crisis and the possibility of “Armageddon.”

Still, NATO and the United States should work toward an agreement with Russia that eliminates the most immediate pathways for nuclear escalation. This would involve a commitment to keep Ukraine out of NATO and NATO forces and infrastructure out of Ukraine—a policy directly in line with the U.S. interest of avoiding a war with Russia. Instead, a posture of armed neutrality would help Ukraine defend itself against renewed Russian aggression without running the risk of a direct NATO–Russia war.

NATO has accepted an uncomfortably high risk of nuclear escalation in Ukraine for too long. On its 75th anniversary, the alliance should not court the same fate it prudently avoided throughout the Cold War.

The post NATO Must Make a Nuclear Deal With Russia appeared first on The American Conservative.

Detroit Rapper ‘Icewear Vezzo’ Explains Why He is Supporting Trump in 2024 (VIDEO)

This past weekend when Trump held an event in Detroit, a rapper named Icewear Vezzo was approached by a reporter and explained why he is supporting Donald Trump this November.

His answer was very logical. He simply explained that he has now lived under the policies of both men and he likes Trump’s policies better.

Millions of Americans are reaching this same simple conclusion right now.

Axios reported:

Former President Trump swapped his typical campaign message in favor of one that catered to working-class Black Detroiters on Saturday.

Why it matters: Trump’s campaign stop to an overwhelmingly Democratic-voting area is part of his campaign’s effort to attract Black voters.

What they’re saying: The former president focused on criminal justice reform, his support for funding historically Black colleges and school choice, while listening to issues facing Black business owners. He didn’t mention his felony convictions from his New York criminal trial…

Local celebrities attended the event, including rappers Sada Baby, Icewear Vezzo and Peezy, telling reporters they support the former president.

See the video below:

ICEWEAR VEZZO: “I’m not voting based off of personal feelings, I’m voting based off personal experience. I’ve experienced Trump as president. I’ve experienced Joe Biden as president — and I like TRUMP as president more.” pic.twitter.com/36UH5Aicsu

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 17, 2024

According to Rap-Up, Vezzo is already facing ‘backlash’ for openly supporting Trump:

Peezy And Icewear Vezzo Face Backlash For Linking With Donald Trump

Politics is always a tricky topic within social circles. Saturday (June 15), Peezy and Icewear Vezzo found out the hard way after posting pictures with Donald Trump during his visit to Detroit, Michigan.

In Peezy’s Instagram post, he said, “I Told Donald Trump If We Can Bring The ACT BACK We Can MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. And I Got Trump Coming To Sloppy Crab TONIGHT. WE LIT.” Shortly after, he commented, “Can anybody explain why they are so mad? I thought we was free to vote for whoever we want?? What’s the problem? Does everybody have to be a follower? Do you all hate free thinkers?”

One fan responded, “Dude will brag about slanging dope and killing his own people… and identify with a guy who despises guys like him… make it make sense.” Another user stated, “Rappers stay falling for this s**t every time [the] election [is] around the corner that’s why them n**gas gotta stay out [of] politics.”

This is typical for the left. They punish people for thinking the wrong way.

The post Detroit Rapper ‘Icewear Vezzo’ Explains Why He is Supporting Trump in 2024 (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

POLL: Trump Takes Lead Over Biden in Vital Swing State of Pennsylvania

Trump has taken the lead over Biden in Pennsylvania, according to new polling from Marist.

Once again, Pennsylvania is going to play a major role in the election. Democrats see the state as a must-win for Biden, but Trump won the state in 2016 and could certainly take it again in 2024.

If Biden loses here in November, it definitely narrows his path to 270 votes in the Electoral College.

Breitbart News reported:

Poll: Trump Leads Biden in Key Swing State of Pennsylvania

Former President Donald Trump is edging out President Joe Biden in the key swing state of Pennsylvania, a recent Marist Poll found.

The survey, taken June 3-6, 2024, following the Manhattan jury’s controversial guilty verdict in Trump’s business records trial, shows Trump edging Biden out by two points in the Keystone State. The former president garners 47 percent support to Biden’s 45 percent.

Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. comes in a distant third place with three percent support, while one percent go for Green Party candidate Jill Stein, one percent go for Cornel West, and less than one percent go for Libertarian candidate Chase Oliver. Another two percent remain undecided.

The survey also found Trump edging out Biden among independent voters in Pennsylvania with 42 percent support to Biden’s 40 percent support. Eight percent of independents go for Kennedy, followed by three percent for West and three percent for Stein.

Marist Poll noted that Biden had the advantage among independents in the Keystone State in 2020 by an eight-point margin.

See the breakdown below:

2024 Pennsylvania GE:

Trump 47% (+2)
Biden 45%
Kennedy 3%
West 1%
Stein 1%
Oliver 0%

.@maristpoll, 1,181 RV, 6/3-6https://t.co/2PGamRYgz4

— Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) June 17, 2024

Trump is headed to Philadelphia later this week.

️PHILADELPHIA, PA!
️Saturday, June 22nd
The Liacouras Center
7:00pmE
️https://t.co/BJEjTMtIZ4 pic.twitter.com/nA4fCXvcoX

— Dan Scavino Jr. (@DanScavino) June 17, 2024

The Trump campaign is very wise to keep visiting these blue cities. You do not see Biden going into heavily red areas.

The post POLL: Trump Takes Lead Over Biden in Vital Swing State of Pennsylvania appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Pizza Hut Closes 15 Locations Amid Major Franchisee Dispute — 129 More at Risk of Closing

A significant number of Pizza Hut restaurants face closure due to an ongoing financial dispute with one of its major franchisees.

As reported by Daily Mail, a total of 150 restaurants are set to close, with an additional 129 across Illinois, Georgia, South Carolina, and Wisconsin on the brink of shutting down as part of the dispute.

The closure wave began unexpectedly in Northwest Indiana, where several Pizza Hut outlets ceased operations. Signs on the doors read “location closed” or “We apologize for any inconvenience. We are temporarily closed,” NWI.com first reported.

Pizza Hut’s website also listed locations in Merrillville, Crown Point, Hobart, Lowell, Cedar Lake, Winfield, Valparaiso, Chesterton, Portage and Michigan City as closed.

Pizza Hut’s headquarters in Plano, Texas said the closures should hopefully be temporary but cautioned that not all locations may reopen.

The root of the issue lies in the contractual disagreements and financial strain between Pizza Hut and Texas-based EYM Group, which operates multiple restaurant brands nationwide.

According to court records, the franchisee defaulted on its payments to Pizza Hut, failing to pay 3 million owed in late 2022 and 2.6 million owed in 2023. EYM Group has been seeking to sell its Pizza Hut restaurants, citing inflation, labor costs, a lack of innovation, and other factors as contributing to its financial struggles.

In a lawsuit filed by EYM Group against Pizza Hut, the franchisee alleged that Pizza Hut has failed to keep up with modern business practices and failed to invest heavily in digital and delivery.

According to the lawsuit from EYM Group, per NWI.com:

“Pizza Hut has a great responsibility to its franchisees. It has not kept up with the heavy competition from its competitors, e.g., Dominos, Little Caesars. Pizza Hut has failed to keep up with modern times.

“Pizza Hut failed to adapt to modern business practices. Pizza Hut didn’t observe carefully enough how people had begun to live. Pizza Hut failed to keep up with new technology. Pizza Hut failed to heavily invest in digital and delivery. Pizza Hut has no distinct identity like others. Pizza Hut has no image or identity that sticks with patrons. Pizza Hut lost its brand identity. Pizza Hut took millennials for granted, which are a demographic with money that should have been the target of ad campaigns. Pizza is a millennial approved food. Pizza Hut neglected loyal customers as well as its franchisees.

“Pizza Hut’s modern gourmet menus flopped and did not target existing customers. Pizza Hut failed to innovate; in fact it rarely offers new items.

“Pizza Hut’s revamped menu failed and scared off loyal customers. Pizza Hut cut its research and development budget and it has showed. In recent years, the best Pizza Hut has managed to do is change the cheese in its Stuffed Crust from mozzarella to cheddar, or trot out an occasional, ill-fated appetizer like the Stuffed Cheez-It or the Philly steak melt! Then despite Pizza Hut becoming the official pizza of the NFL, the Pizza Hut online ordering system failed during the Super Bowl, costing franchisees monetary losses on a day they should be profiting.”

Pizza Hut filed a lawsuit on June 7 alleging a breach of contract by EYM. This followed a similar lawsuit filed by EYM against Pizza Hut on March 15.

EYM Group and Pizza Hut reached a forbearance agreement last August. However, EYM alleges that Pizza Hut is violating the terms of this agreement and trying to force it to sell its 15 locations in Indiana for $100,000 per store.

EYM Group originally paid $8.56 million for its Indiana restaurants ($600,000 to build), which employ more than 200 workers. It accuses Pizza Hut of sabotaging its efforts to sell these establishments.

“Pizza Hut is saying, if you don’t sign our draconian paperwork today, then we will make sure the bank calls your loans on Tuesday,” EYM Group said in a lawsuit. “Pizza Hut has a well-earned reputation for using strong-arm tactics to pressure its franchisees. Pizza Hut knows exactly what it is doing.”

More from Daily Mail:

Staff at Pizza Huts in Indiana posted on social media that they were given no warning ahead of the closures. They said they had been told to file for unemployment.

A Pizza Hut spokesperson said: ‘The company is working to transition these locations and expects many of them will reopen soon.’

Pizza Hut has set EYM staggered deadlines for payment in each state. The chain will close down the restaurants in each if the debts are not paid.

The deadline for Indiana was last Wednesday, June 12. The 15 restaurants were shuttered two days later.

‘This is Pizza Hut bosses showing they are not bluffing,’ an insider told DailyMail.com.

Next up is South Carolina with a deadline of June 27. Then it is Illinois on July 7, Georgia on July 11 and Wisconsin on September 5.

The post Pizza Hut Closes 15 Locations Amid Major Franchisee Dispute — 129 More at Risk of Closing appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Rep. Byron Donalds Clashes With NBC News Journo Over Lawfare Campaign Against Trump (VIDEO)

Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida appeared on Meet the Press this week and pushed back on host Peter Alexander over the ongoing campaign of lawfare against Trump.

Donalds pointed out that this is a clear case of election interference while Alexander kept trying to suggest that Biden has nothing to do with it.

Alexander was arguing and seemingly trying to convince Donalds that this is all perfectly normal and on the up and up.

This is so typical of the media. They think their job is to fight with Republicans on behalf of the Democrat party.

FOX News reported:

Byron Donalds clashes with NBC host over Trump charges: ‘Two-tiered justice…plain to see’

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., sparred with NBC’s Peter Alexander on Sunday’s “Meet the Press” after the host questioned Donalds’ claims of a “two-tiered justice system” under President Biden.

The Florida congressman — who is reportedly on former President Trump’s shortlist for his 2024 running mate — argued that the Supreme Court should step in and overturn Trump’s felony convictions in a Manhattan court last month. He argued the judge had violated Trump’s constitutional rights by not identifying the crime in the original indictment.

“You’re not allowed to do that. Every judge knows this. This is why everybody believes this is going to be overturned on appeal. Because it was meant to interfere with the presidential selection. That’s the problem,” Donalds argued.

However, Alexander staunchly defended Biden’s Justice Department and argued that the prosecution of Hunter Biden proved there was “equal justice.”

See the clips below:

Democrats have weaponized our institutions to target their political rivals & protect themselves.

Their lawfare against Trump is election interference & demonstrates the 2-tiered system of justice in our nation.

This is political.
This is wrong.
This should be taken to SCOTUS. pic.twitter.com/Vmc9zGdQYW

— Congressman Byron Donalds (@RepDonaldsPress) June 16, 2024

“Let me also explain this one.” @RepDonaldsPress to @MeetThePress host @PeterAlexander who asserted: “To be clear, Joe Biden, there is no evidence he had anything to do with this case…Why is it appropriate for Donald Trump to call for prosecuting his political opponents?” #MTP pic.twitter.com/fa7TfYM57m

— Brent Baker (@BrentHBaker) June 16, 2024

Donalds has been a good ally for Trump. it will be interesting to see if he plays a role in the new Trump administration.

The post Rep. Byron Donalds Clashes With NBC News Journo Over Lawfare Campaign Against Trump (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Tom Cotton Defends Trump’s Foreign Policy on CNN: ‘I’ve Noticed That Vladimir Putin Only Invades Ukraine When Democrats Are President’ (VIDEO)

Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas appeared on CNN with Jake Tapper this weekend and made an astute observation about Russia and Ukraine.

He said that he has noticed that Putin tends to only invade Ukraine when a Democrat is president, noting that Putin did not do this while Trump was president.

Cotton pointed to Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan as one reason for it, saying that Putin sensed weakness in Biden after that.

The Daily Wire reports:

Tom Cotton Defends Trump’s Position On Ukraine: ‘Putin Only Invades Ukraine When Democrats Are President’

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) defended former President Donald Trump’s position on Ukraine during an interview over the weekend, noting that the country is only invaded when Democrats are in the White House.

Cotton made the remarks during a Sunday interview with Jake Tapper on CNN’s “State of the Union” when asked about comments that Trump made at a rally where he noted that Ukraine seemingly never stops asking the U.S. for assistance in their war against Russia.

“I think it’s important to look at the context of what’s happened in Ukraine over the last 10 years,” Cotton said. “I have noticed that Vladimir Putin only invades Ukraine when Democrats are president. It happened under Barack Obama. It happened under Joe Biden. It didn’t happen with Donald Trump.”

“In fact, the weapons that Ukraine used in the early days of this war to fend off the Russian invasion are the weapons that Donald Trump sent, that Barack Obama and Joe Biden had refused to send,” he continued.

Here’s the video:

The only time Putin invades Ukraine is when there is a Democratic president.

Joe Biden following Barack Obama’s example of weakness has unleashed chaos in the world and hurt America and our allies. pic.twitter.com/ZZpW3DIpBJ

— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) June 16, 2024

The world was a more stable place on Trump’s watch. Democrats and the media claimed Trump would be a disaster, but it is Biden who has caused the world to fall into chaos.

The post Tom Cotton Defends Trump’s Foreign Policy on CNN: ‘I’ve Noticed That Vladimir Putin Only Invades Ukraine When Democrats Are President’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Secret Service Agent Robbed at Gunpoint During Joe Biden’s Trip to California Resulting in Officer-Involved Shooting

Meanwhile in the Democrat hellhole of California…

Joe Biden’s Secret Service Agent was robbed at gunpoint in Southern California (Orange County) on Saturday.

Biden traveled to Los Angeles over the weekend to attend a ritzy Hollywood fundraiser with Barack Obama.

According to the Tustin Police Department, a member of Biden’s Secret Service detail was robbed at gunpoint on Saturday night which resulted in an officer-involved shooting.

The suspect(s) has not been taken into custody.

“On Saturday, June 15, 2024 at approximately 9:36 pm, Tustin Police Officers responded to a call of a possible robbery that just occurred at the Tustin Fields I residential community. On arrival, officers discovered the victim was a member of the U.S. Secret Service and his bag was stolen at gunpoint. During the incident an officer (agent) involved shooting occurred. The suspect(s) were not located and it is unknown at this time whether the suspect(s) were injured as a result of the incident. Officers have located some of the victim’s belongings in the area and the incident is still being investigated. There is no known threat to the public,” the Tustin Police Department said.

“A 2004-2006 silver Infiniti FX35 or vehicle similar was seen leaving the scene,” the Tustin PD said in a press release on Monday.

BREAKING: A U.S. Secret Service agent was robbed at gunpoint over the weekend during Biden’s trip to California, police say pic.twitter.com/Ulz7N7o8tk

— Jacob Wheeler (@JWheelertv) June 17, 2024

Biden spent the weekend in Los Angeles rubbing elbows with celebrities.

Out-of-touch Hollywood actors and singers like George Clooney, Barbara Streisand and Julia Roberts helped Biden raise money Saturday night at the Peacock Theater.

Biden babbled incoherently about the unemployment rate and lack of jobs under his watch during the fundraiser.

Joe Biden is cooked. Even Barack Obama knows it.

WATCH:

BIDEN: We have the “highest unemployment” in 50 years!

“You know, my, my, my son says, you ought to have a, uh, you know, we all have, uh, various short-term descriptions for your jobs, for what you’re accomplished. You should say, ‘Joe jobs.’” pic.twitter.com/UWa8xEdBB8

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 17, 2024

The post Secret Service Agent Robbed at Gunpoint During Joe Biden’s Trip to California Resulting in Officer-Involved Shooting appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

McMAYHEM: Florida McDonald’s Employee Allegedly Opens Fire at Customers Over Drive-Thru Argument (VIDEO)

Credit: Lakeland Police Department/Fox News

A nasty dispute at a Florida McDonald’s drive-thru turned violent last week.

FOX 35 Orlando reported Lakeland police officers responded to a shooting on June 14 at the McDonalds located on East Memorial Boulevard. Police say 22-year-old Mickey D’s employee Chassidy Gardner started shooting at customers after getting into a verbal altercation.

The Lakeland Police Department revealed the customers were reportedly angry because they felt their food order was wrong and did not exactly behave peacefully either.

Surveillance video footage obtained by the police shows Gardner arguing with the customers at the drive-through window for a few moments. The suspect then throws a drink at them as they leave.

Two customers respond by exiting their vehicle, shoving open the drive-through window, and throwing drinks at Gardner. The employee arms herself with a gun.

The tape next shows Gardner exiting the vehicle to confront the unruly customers.

WATCH:

Police say Gardner fired her gun at the car as it was departing the area. The vehicle was hit at least once.

Gardner was arrrested that same night and booked into the Polk County jail on a charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Credit: Lakeland Police Department

One day later, though, Gardner was released from jail the next day after posting a $15,000 bond according to FOX 35 News.

Fox News reached out to McDonald’s for comment but has not received a response.

The post McMAYHEM: Florida McDonald’s Employee Allegedly Opens Fire at Customers Over Drive-Thru Argument (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Ashli Babbitt Lawsuit Against Feds Moved from San Diego to Washington DC – Assigned to Far Left Anti-Trump Judge Appointed by Biden

Image courtesy of @JudicialWatch

Nearly three years after the protests on January 6, 2021, Judicial Watch filed a $30 million wrongful death suit against the federal government for the Capitol Police shooting of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt.

The Washington Examiner reported that the suit was filed on behalf of Babbitt’s estate and her husband, Aaron Babbitt, and claims the officer who shot Babbitt was “incompetent” and “dangerous” and should have recognized Babbitt posed no threat to Congress when she entered the House speaker’s lobby.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton shared on X at the time, “We just filed an important lawsuit.  A $30 million dollar wrongful death action against the United States government on behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s husband and her estate. Ashli Babbit was killed for no good reason that day. Shot and killed by Lt. Michael Byrd.”

“Judicial Watch is seeking accountability from the United States government, that is responsible for that awful and unjustified shooting death.”

“Remember, the only homicide on January 6 was the unlawful shooting death, as our lawsuit alleges, of poor Ashli Babbitt. She deserves justice.  She deserves accountability. And I tell you, Judicial Watch, and I know all of our supporters, are honored to be able to pursue this lawsuit to get justice for Ashli.”

JUSTICE! Judicial Watch Files Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Ashli Babbitt Killing!@TomFittonhttps://t.co/3bjPFl65EN pic.twitter.com/SzHIUKkhHq

— Judicial Watch (@JudicialWatch) January 5, 2024

According to the suit, “Ashli remained conscious for minutes or longer after being shot by Lt. Byrd. Ashli experienced extreme pain, suffering, mental anguish, and intense fear before slipping into pre-terminal unconsciousness. The autopsy report identified the cause of death as a ‘gunshot wound to left anterior shoulder’ with an onset interval of ‘minutes.’ The fact that Ashli was alive and conscious in extreme pain and suffering is documented in videos of the shooting. Furthermore, nothing about the wound track described in the autopsy report would be expected to result in immediate death or instantaneous loss of consciousness, and Ashli’s lungs contained blood, further confirming that she was alive and breathing after being shot. Ashli was pronounced dead at Washington Hospital Center at 3:15 p.m. The medical examiner determined that the manner of death was homicide.”

In April, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton warned his audience that the Biden DOJ was trying to “forum shop” the Ashli Babbitt filing in order to rig the lawsuit by her family over her homicide in the US Capitol.

Tom told his audience, “The request for a change in venue is clearly influenced by Defendant’s strongest motivation for changing venue, which is to select the forum where it feels it would receive a favorable process and outcome based on adversity against January 6 participants. By its motion, Defendant hopes to unfairly and unjustly connect Ashli Babbitt to violence, injuries, and deaths for which she is blameless and connect her by association to thousands of individuals convicted of misdemeanors and felonies for which she was never charged and is unable to present a defense due to the lawless actions of one of Defendant’s employees in shooting and killing her.”

On Monday Tom Fitton reported that the DOJ was successful in their attempts to move the Ashli Babbitt case from her home district in San Diego to the far left Washington DC district. The case was assigned to Judge Jia Cobb, a far left attorney who was appointed by Joe Biden.

This seems to keep happening in America today.

UPDATE: Federal court grants Biden DOJ request to move $30 million Ashli Babbitt wrongful death lawsuit from Ashli’s home in San Diego to Washington DC. The case was just assigned to Judge Jia Cobb, who was appointed to the bench by President Biden in 2021. https://t.co/wKCCv3anVk

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) June 17, 2024

Judge Jia Cobb oversaw J6 prisoner Ryan Samsel’s case who nearly died in prison.

J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel Can’t Walk, Suffers Life Threatening Condition In Solitary Confinment And Judge, Marshals, Guards, Congress Could Not Care Less

The post Ashli Babbitt Lawsuit Against Feds Moved from San Diego to Washington DC – Assigned to Far Left Anti-Trump Judge Appointed by Biden appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.