Month: July 2024

McCracken’s genealogical research discloses that Harris’s four-times-paternal-great-grandfather, Hamilton Brown, was born in Co Antrim in 1776, the same year as the US Declaration of Independence.

Brown migrated to Jamaica, then a British colony, where he became a passionate slave owner on the sugar plantations that formed the backbone of the island’s economy.

He resisted the abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire in 1832 and even traveled back to Antrim to replace his slaves with workers from his native county.

Donald Harris, a Stanford University economics professor and Kamala Harris’s father, acknowledged their lineage to Hamilton Brown, Kamala’s slave-owning great-great-great-great grandfather, in an article titled “Reflections of a Jamaican Father.” He wrote:

“My roots go back, within my lifetime, to my paternal grandmother Miss Chrishy (née Christiana Brown, descendant of Hamilton Brown who is on record as plantation and slave owner and founder of Brown’s Town) and to my maternal grandmother Miss Iris (née Iris Finegan, farmer and educator, from Aenon Town and Inverness, ancestry unknown to me).

The Harris name comes from my paternal grandfather Joseph Alexander Harris, landowner and agricultural ‘produce’ exporter (mostly pimento or allspice), who died in 1939 one year after I was born and is buried in the church yard of the magnificent Anglican Church which Hamilton Brown built in Brown’s Town (and where, as a child, I learned the catechism, was baptised and confirmed, and served as an acolyte).”

More from Daily Mail:

Northern Irish historian Stephen McCracken said today that Brown was a ‘notorious’ slaver and ‘not nice fellow’ who was born in Antrim but later settled in Jamaica. 

‘I actually thought this was going to be a nice story, like (former US presidents) McKinley, Nixon, Jackson, Roosevelt, all of whom have links to Antrim, but it wasn’t’, he said. 

Brown travelled to London to protest against the abolition of slavery and then turned his attention to Irish migrants when he was no longer allowed to enslave Africans, Mr McCracken told the Belfast Telegraph.

Mr McCracken has examined Kamala’s UK roots after it was discovered she has ancestry in Co Antrim through Hamilton Brown.

‘Hamilton Brown was a notorious figure, and not a nice fellow,’ he said.

‘Hamilton was born in Antrim, just north of Ballymoney, before he moved to Jamaica as a teenager. That’s where he became a bookmaker, and then a plantation owner, and therefore a slave owner.

‘His gravestone is in Saint Ann in Jamaica, which lists his birthplace as Antrim.

‘He had numerous slaves, in fact Hamilton Brown routinely travelled back and forth to London to protest the abolishment of slavery. 

‘He would come back to Ireland to take migrants back to Jamaica to work once slavery was abolished. A quote refers to him as “making slaves of migrants” in Ireland.’

In 2019, it was reported that Brown owned at least 121 slaves in 1826.

Read more here.

 

The post FLASHBACK: Kamala Harris is a Descendant of a ‘Notorious’ Irish Slave Owner on Sugar Plantations in Jamaica appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

FBI Director Chris Wray admits to Congress that the FBI is not investigating why President Trump was allowed on stage after a suspect on a roof with a gun was identified at the rally.

FBI Director Chris Wray testified Wednesday morning in front of the House Judiciary Committee on the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump.

The 45th President and GOP nominee for president in 2024 was shot at his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

The Secret Service, FBI, and local government officials allowed the young sniper to crawl up a roof and fire off several shots at President Trump before government snipers shot him dead.

During his testimony Chris Wray admitted that his agency was not investigating why President Trump was allowed on stage when the would-be assassin was identified near the building by government officials and on the roof before the shooting took place.

Wray made the comments during questioning by Rep. Dan Bishop.

Chris Wray admitted Crooks fired off eight shots before he was killed.

Chris Wray: (01:13) We have recovered eight cartridges on the roof.

Rep. Dan Bishop (01:19) Why was crooks allowed to get off eight shots?

Chris Wray (01:23) Well, that, I think, is something we’re still digging into. Again, maybe this is a good place for me to make clear the different investigations that are going on. Because certainly…

Chris Wray then admitted that the FBI was not investigating why Trump was allowed on the stage. That seems odd.

Rep. Dan Bishop: …I think the American people want to know. Why was President Trump not kept off the stage?

Chris Wray: We don’t know the answer to that, but I want to be clear, and this is important because I think it goes to questions that I can and cannot answer.

Our investigation, the FBI’s mandate, is focused on the shooter and all things related to his attack. Now, obviously, I understand very much the intense interest and focus on the Secret Services, performance, actions, decision making, et cetera. There are two separate After Action Reviews, the DHS Inspector General and the outside independent panel that’s been convenient or focused on that. Now, our investigation will- Everybody understands it.

Rep. Dan Bishop: Here’s the problem. We’re out 13 days, and you say we’ve been disclosing. We had the colonel from the Pennsylvania State Police in front of Homeland yesterday. He was quite candid. He disclosed to us that Butler emergency services unit personnel were posted into the windows on the second floor of the AGR building, that they left there to go pursue the person that they spotted, Crooks. That they texted a photo of Crooks to the PSP representative in the Command Center. That information was relayed to the United States Secret Service. They asked it to be texted to someone else. That was many minutes before President Trump took the stand. What we don’t know is why were they not keeping him off the stand? And to the extent, I know we always hear when there’s a criminal investigation, you got to wait for that to develop. But do you have any reason to Do you have any other target of your criminal investigation other than Crooks? Who’s dead.

Wray continued to stonewall.

Here is the video.

We need answers and transparency.

The sooner the better. pic.twitter.com/xV5Nksjptl

— Rep. Dan Bishop (@RepDanBishop) July 24, 2024

The post Chris Wray Admits FBI Is Not Looking Into Why Trump Was Allowed on Stage After Would-Be Assassin Was Spotted an Hour Before Shooting Started (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Representative Eli Crane of Arizona, during Tuesday’s U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security hearing, asked Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Col. Christopher Paris questions regarding Trump rally shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks’s home.

The former Navy Seal, representing Arizona’s 2nd Congressional District, asked Col. Paris, “Did your team make entry and conduct any investigation of the suspect’s home?”

Paris responded, “I believe we had people that participated in securing it; there were bomb assets that we provided on the night of.”

Crane continued, “Did you get any reports from any of your agents of anything fishy at the home?”

Paris answered, “I was briefed on uh..” before Crane asked, “Was there any silverware found in the home or trash?”

Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner responded, “I have nothing in the briefing I was given.”

Crane added, “Was it extremely clean, almost like a medical lab? Were you given any of those reports?”

“I wasn’t given any of those details,” added Paris.

Rep. Crane concluded his questioning by saying “That’s what I’m hearing, interesting.”

WATCH:

“I was a Sniper in the Seal Teams, Colonel, and this is just obvious…”

“Are you surprised that a lot of Americans think there might be more to this story?” pic.twitter.com/q1aCOjI2JL

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) July 23, 2024

Here’s the full video:

A 20-year-old kid with no camouflage:
Crawled up a white roof with an AR-15
Fired shots at Trump from within 150 yards
Flew a drone to conduct site surveillance
Was spotted with a rangefinder

Meanwhile, USSS missed the most obvious spot for counter sniper operations… pic.twitter.com/QSOPzY8WIK

— Rep. Eli Crane (@RepEliCrane) July 24, 2024

The post Rep. Eli Crane Reveals Trump Shooter’s Home Was Reportedly Scrubbed Clean Like “Medical Lab” and No Silverware or Trash Was Found in Home (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Credit: @StefWKight

The corporate media’s whitewashing of Kamala Harris’s dangerous record is kicking into overdrive as they try to desperately keep President Trump from winning a second term. Conservative social media users caught one outlet’s “reporter” in the act of doing precisely this and did not mince words.

Axios published an article on Wednesday titled “Harris border confusion haunts her new campaign.” The outlet notes that Joe Biden asked Harris to help him with the immigration crisis, which has arguably become her most significant vulnerability as her presidential campaign gets underway.

But Axios then runs cover for Harris and states that Biden never named her border czar.

This would certainly come as a surprise to millions of Americans if true.

Credit: Axios

But as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) notes, the same reporter, Stef W. Knight, who authored today’s article, wrote a piece titled “Biden Puts Harris in Charge of Border Crisis” just over three years ago.

The same “journalist,” @StefWKight, also wrote an article with this headline in March of 2021.

Why does the media constantly lie and think you’ll believe them? https://t.co/uEniqnObXH pic.twitter.com/PYVjJwO0xJ

— Marjorie Taylor Greene (@mtgreenee) July 24, 2024

Not only that, Free Beacon writer Peter J. Haason points out that Knight described Harris as the BORDER CZAR in her March 2021 article, completely blowing up her lie.

How dare conservatives rely on Axios and the rest of the corporate media’s reporting to tag Harris accurately?

Oh weird because I read this in Axios: https://t.co/8gnRoCfP28 pic.twitter.com/9O0ZBlMspb

— Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) July 24, 2024

Unsurprisingly, other X users had harsh words for Knight for spreading fake news.

Getting paid to lie must be nice. Should be ashamed of yourself

— Storm Paglia (@storm_paglia) July 24, 2024

Stalin would be proud of you, Stef.

— Allen (@AllenIn2112) July 24, 2024

This is absurd gaslighting. It’s so incredibly ridiculous it’s wild. Jaw droppingly dishonest! The utter lack of integrity is a sight to behold. Well done!

— RGWNCC41 (@SeniorVPofOps) July 24, 2024

“If the entire border crisis was represented by the Empire State Building, then the portion that VP Harris managed would only be the size of a postage stamp at the very top.”

– Stef W Kight, loyal soldier in the resistance

— Wesley Mullins (@wesleyamullins) July 24, 2024

Your reporting is definitely “a slice” of the truth.

— Parker Thayer (@ParkerThayer) July 24, 2024

The corporate media’s lies to paint Harris as the Democrats’ chosen one are only beginning, and this alone makes her a dangerous foe. To prevail in November, conservatives must counter these prevarications at every turn, and the Trump campaign must spare no expense in exposing Americans to Harris’s true nature.

The post CAUGHT REDHANDED: Axios Writer’s Claim That Kamala Harris was Never Named Border Czar Backfires Spectacularly After X Users Discover What She Wrote Three Years Ago appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Rep. Emilia Sykes (D-OH) distances herself from Kamala Harris.

Rep. Emilia Sykes (D-OH) is running for re-election in Ohio’s 13th Congressional District against Republican Kevin Coughlin in a vulnerable district for Democrats.

Coughlin previously represented the 46th district in the Ohio House of Representatives from 1997 to 2001 and was appointed to the Ohio Senate for the 27th district, where he was subsequently elected to two full terms.

Sykes has consistently voted as a far-leftist and recently voted no on the Safe Act, which prohibits illegal immigrants from voting in our elections.

When a reporter attempted to press Sykes on Kamala Harris’ failed record on immigration and her utter disaster as ‘Border Czar,’ Sykes could not get away fast enough.

Sykes was asked, “Hello, Congresswoman, do you think that Kamala Harris did a good job as the border czar?”

Sykes ignored the question and kept speed walking.

The questioner pressed for an answer, asking again, “Congresswoman, do you think Kamala Harris did a good job as the border czar? Yes or no?”

In an effort to be snaking in the face on an important and substantive question, Sykes replied, “I don’t know who Kamala Harris is,” apparently taking issue with the pronunciation of Kamala’s name, which we have now learned is a form of “right-wing hate.”

“She’s the vice president,” the questioner said before Sykes disappeared to hide in her office.

Watch:

How many vulnerable Democrats will run from Kamala’s disastrous record in the lead-up to Election Day?

The post Vulnerable House Dem Runs from Questions About Kamala’s Disasterous Record as Border Czar: “I Don’t Know Who Kamala Harris Is” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The world’s richest man stunned Democrats when, only hours after the assassination attempt on President Trump at his Butler, PA rally, he announced that he was endorsing Trump in his re-election bid.

I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery pic.twitter.com/ZdxkF63EqF

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 13, 2024

It was also revealed that Elon Musk would donate an astounding $45 million to President Trump’s campaign each month through the November election.

Trump reacts to Elon Musk endorsing him and pledging $45 million a month to his campaign.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/8RR1TX7u77

— AF Post (@AFpost) July 20, 2024

Musk, who has been increasingly vocal about the illegal alien invasion on our southern border, has used his “X” platform (formerly Twitter) to raise awareness about the Democrat Party’s plan to register millions of illegal aliens to vote in upcoming elections, which would steal votes from American citizens and turn America into a one-party hell hole run by corrupt tyrants and woke, anti-American thugs.

“X” user Owen Gregorian tweeted a portion of an article from the left-leaning UK publication, The Independent where they report that Musk is warning 2024 will be the last election ‘actually decided by US citizens.’

The billionaire’s claim came as House Republicans moved to restrict voting to US citizens only.

Elon Musk has claimed that the 2024 presidential election would likely be the last to be decided by US citizens, blaming an “influx” of illegal immigrants being allowed to vote.

The South African-born billionaire’s comments on his social media platform, X, came in response to news that Republicans in the House of Representatives passed a bill requiring citizenship status to be added to the ten-yearly census, despite opposition from the White House.

“Unanimous Democrat opposition to requiring citizenship for apportionment of House seats and Presidential electoral college votes says it all,” Mr. Musk said on Thursday in reply to news that Dems voted along party lines on Wednesday and opposed the bill.

“The Democratic Party goal is to disenfranchise US citizens by importing as many illegal immigrants as possible.

“Given the massive influx of illegals from every country on Earth, 2024 will probably be the last election actually decided by US citizens,” he claimed.

Elon Musk says 2024 will be last election ‘actually decided by US citizens’

The billionaire’s claim came as House Republicans moved to restrict voting to US citizens only

Elon Musk has claimed that the 2024 presidential election would likely be the last to be decided by US… pic.twitter.com/AzBMmkH2Vf

— Owen Gregorian (@OwenGregorian) May 10, 2024

In addition to warning about the serious threat our nation faces, if we allow illegal aliens to register to vote in our elections, Musk has recently been saying that states need to ditch electronic voting machines and tabulators.

“Kanekoa The Great,” who has almost one million followers on “X,” recently tweeted about Elon Musk’s suggestions for making our elections more secure, which include voting in person, using only paper ballots, and same-day counting.

Kanekoa The Great wrote:

@elonmusk says elections should be in person with paper ballots and same-day counting.

It is crucial to differentiate between “paper ballots” and “hand-marked paper ballots” because voting machine companies have employed a misleading tactic.

About 20% of the country uses ballot marking device (BMD) voting machines.

These BMDs print out a summary card that some election officials refer to as a “paper ballot” or, more accurately, a “machine-marked paper ballot.”

These “machine-marked paper ballots” include a barcode or QR code above or below human-readable text.

The barcode or QR code, which humans cannot read, is the only part of the ballot counted as the vote.

Election security experts warn that these voting machines are the most susceptible to hacking because hackers can manipulate these barcodes or QR codes to change votes without the voter knowing.

The paper might read Trump, but the barcode could actually be tallying a vote for Biden, and the voter would be unaware.

Moreover, studies show that most voters do not review the human-readable text printed on their “machine-marked paper ballot” before submitting it.

The solution is to get rid of ballot marking devices and to use “hand-marked paper ballots.”

Elon Musk responded with four simple words: “No machines at all.”

No machines at all

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 21, 2024

Yesterday, independent investigator extraordinaire Yehuda Miller created a video specifically designed to catch Elon Musk’s eye.

The awesome conservative commentator George Behizy retweeted his video to his 217K followers.

Yehuda Miller is most well-known for being the king of uncovering dirty deeds by corrupt elected officials like Michigan’s dirty AG Dana Nessel, via FOIA requests.

In his video below, Yehuda can be seen wheeling up in a Tesla Cybertruck. As he exits the space-age-like vehicle, Miller makes his way to the back, where he holds up what he claims is the hard drive containing evidence Mesa County, Colorado Clerk Tina Peters helped investigators obtain from a Dominion voting machine she allowed them to access. Tina Peters, who is a gold star mom, is now facing up to 20 years in prison for what many claim was an act that was perfectly legal under CO. state law.

Yehuda Miller begins, “We are in the national cyber crisis, our electronic voting machines are essentially one big black box. We would never know what was inside a dominion voting machine if not for a brave 68-year-old Goldstar mom named Tina Peters, who had a duty as the election Clark and Mesa Colorado to preserve the election records. When she believed they were coming to destroy the records, she imaged the hard drive for the whole world to learn the truth.”

Miller pleads for Musk to help get to help save Tina Peters and get to help de-code the contents of the hard drive.”Now she faces 20 years [in prison]! Her trial starts next week, Elon—this is a personal appeal to you. Your technology expertise can be the deciding factor here.”

Please reach out—to everyone watching this!” Miller says as he holds up what appears to be a hard drive. Miller then pleads to X users to help him get Elon’s attention so he can implore the tech genius to help save the innocent election clerk, whose stated intent was to ensure the election equipment used in the 2020 election could be trusted. “Let’s unleash the power of X to save Tina Peters!” Miller says as the video ends.

I’m not sure how to help.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 23, 2024

Elon Musk responded by saying he doesn’t know what he can do. Over 1,000 “X” users, including Yehuda Miller, were quick to tell him what they thought Elon could do.

Yehuda responded: “Thank you for replying to this, @elonmusk. All we need is for your world-class engineers to analyze the data and reveal the truth about the machines to the world.

AZ US Senate candidate Kari Lake responded to Elon, explaining who Tina Peters is: “Tina Peters is a Gold Star Mom and an Election Integrity Patriot.”

Another “X” user wrote, “All voting system code should be open source,” a sentiment most voters would agree with, but not likely to become a reality anytime soon.

Diligent Denizon explained to Musk: “I think he’s asking you to use xAi or one of your other engineering companies to look under the hood and see how they’re potentially cheating or unsecured.”

“X” user Adam Lowitsz suggested Musk help but find a way to protect himself, as Dominion appears to have successfully sued others for questioning what’s under the hood. “Before you do decide to help check with your legal department first, the Democrats are already going after you heavily. It’s probably best to outsource it to another company and donate to that company . This affords you legal protection and separates you from direct involvement,” he wrote.

And finally, Tina Peters herself responded. “Thank you I’m grateful for the outpouring of support and standing up to stop the [S]elections-please go to http://TinaPeters.us/reports
@PatriotMarkCook has the image and can help.
http://FreeTina.com has trial dates. The world needs to know,” Peters said, as she tagged her attorney Stephanie Lambert and former billionaire Patrick Byrne, who, along with My Pillow founder Mike Lindell, have been helping Tina Peters with her lawsuits.

The post Independent Investigator Yehuda Miller Asks Elon Musk To Help CO. County Clerk Tina Peters By Examining Her Hard Drive Copy of Dominion Voting Machine —Elon Responds appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

By Wayne Allyn Root

Donald J. Trump is not supposed to be alive. It’s literally a miracle that President Trump is still standing. There was clearly a conspiracy by the highest levels of government, the Deep State, DC Swamp and Democrats to have him murdered on Saturday, July 13th.

Only divine intervention kept their plan from working.

Trump was winning by a landslide, destroying Joe Biden in every poll, and about to preside over the most popular and successful political convention in history while unifying the entire country.

But the forces of evil running our country thought they had the solution- eliminate him.

The Deep State is in shock that Trump survived, let alone turn lemons into lemonade. The assassination attempt gave Trump the most heroic, iconic image in the history of modern American politics.

Everything that has happened since has been a result of the shock, panic and desperation of the Democrats and Deep State. They needed to come up with a Plan B fast.

First, Biden just happened to suffer a serious “medical emergency” in Las Vegas. Next, Nancy Pelosi read him “the riot act” and threatened to enforce the 25thamendment to have him forcibly removed from office. Biden’s family agreed to his resignation and hastily produced a letter of resignation with a signature that clearly doesn’t match Biden’s.

Next this panicked Deep State cabal quickly anointed Vice President Kamala Harris as Biden’s replacement, and twisted the arms of everyone in the Democrat Party to endorse her- despite serious misgivings.

Except the Obamas.

Now Democrats appear to be stuck with the cackling moron- clearly the worst candidate in history. Back in the 2020 presidential race, Kamala couldn’t attract one delegate and was forced to drop out. She couldn’t even attract black support as the only black candidate in a Democrat primary dominated by black voters.

Then she went onto become the most unpopular Vice President in modern history; lower in the polls than even Biden (the most unpopular president in a century); failing at every assignment; loathed by her boss Joe Biden (who rarely spoke to her); and despised by everyone that worked for her too (92% of her staff quit).

Clearly “Everyone Hates Kamala.”

This is who Democrats have chosen to lead the battle against a formidable President Trump? It makes no sense. Don’t take my word for it. The NY Times recently analyzed every contender to replace Biden and declared Kamala “the least electable.”

Clearly, they’ve made a terrible error, forced by the panic from Trump’s miraculous survival.

The question is “What Comes Next?”

The first poll by Harris X/Forbes shows Trump winning by double digits. Thirteen polls at Real Clear Politics all give the lead to Trump. 13-0 to start is a pretty good indicator Kamala’s honeymoon is already over.

More important is the opinion of the bettors- who are far more accurate than polls. Polymarket bettors give Trump an insurmountable 35-point lead. In individual swing states, the bettors give Trump 30-point leads in Nevada and Arizona, a 40-point lead in Georgia and a 42-point lead in North Carolina.

Which means the bettors (who put their money where their mouth is) think Kamala has literally no chance at victory.

Something is wrong. Democrats must have something up their sleeve. Because this decision to back Kamala makes no sense. And they’re too smart and cunning to make an unforced error like this.

But maybe, just maybe, the answer is…

They don’t care who the candidate is. Anyone will do. Even the least electable choice.

Is the goal now to plan and coordinate crisis and chaos for the Fall election season, to distract from Democrats pulling off another rigged and stolen election?

What evil plans could be on the menu?

First, will Biden soon step down from the presidency? That would make Kamala the incumbent President of the United States, and the first female president.

Next up on the menu is almost certainly a new pandemic. Pick your poison- a resurgence of Covid, Bird Flu, or some as-yet- unnamed, undecided new health panic. This is how Democrats and Deep State traitors open the door to massive cheating with fake mail-in ballots, no Voter ID and no signature match.

Next on the menu is registering 20 to 30 million illegal alien invaders after promising them the world- $10,000 Visa cards, free phones, free lawyers, free housing, free school, free healthcare, tons of welfare and food stamps, and a promise of no deportation.

But Democrats and the Deep State may have a second job for this army of illegals. Will they ask these millions of military-age males to stir up a hornet’s nest of rioting, looting, torching and anarchy in the streets (and on elite college campuses) this Fall?

Democrats love to confuse voters with “the fog of war.” With any luck, this could put the entire nation into shock, despair, fear, intimidation and even lockdown as the election approaches.

Next comes a real war- World War 3. All Democrats and the Deep State need is China threatening Taiwan, Iran threatening Israel, and Russia threatening Europe. More “weapons of mass distraction” to scare and distract the voters, and perhaps even get them to rally around the Democrat President (by then, almost certainly President Kamala Harris).

And we can all expect at least one more assassination attempt on President Trump before November.

Trust me, all or parts of this plan will be carried out in the coming weeks.

With a DEI candidate as weak, incompetent, unqualified and thoroughly unlikeable as Kamala Harris, this is the only way Democrats can hope to hold onto power; stay in control of trillions of dollars of government spending and government contracts; and stay out of prison.

I don’t understand this “Kamala decision,” it makes no sense. But this much I can guarantee- Democrats and the Deep State have something up their sleeve.

Something very evil and shocking is coming.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Watch Wayne’s new TV Show, “The ROOT Reaction” weeknights at 10 PM ET/7 PM Pacific on Real America’s Voice TV, and Wayne’s weekend “America’s Top Ten Countdown” on Saturdays at Noon ET/9 AM PT on Real America’s Voice TV. Watch at RealAmericasVoice.com, or at Rumble, Roku, Pluto, Apple, Dish TV Ch 219, or go to RootforAmerica.com to watch.

The post WAYNE ROOT: The Choice of Kamala Makes No Sense. It’s a Terrible Mistake. But Democrats Have Something Up Their Sleeve. Something Very Evil and Shocking is Coming. appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

In light of recent events, the Secret Service has advised former President Donald Trump to cease holding outdoor rallies due to heightened security concerns. This recommendation follows the attempted assassination during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, where a shooter fired multiple shots at Trump from an elevated position outside the venue​.

The Secret Service, facing scrutiny for the security breach, has increased protective measures for Trump. Still, it wan’t him to adjust.

Bombshell: video of Secret Service stand down leaks! America is now under a deep state coup! https://t.co/4o4WOIAQwl

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) July 23, 2024

Despite these efforts, the Secret Service acknowledged the difficulty of securing outdoor events compared to controlled indoor venues. The shooter, who was quickly neutralized by agents, managed to injure several attendees, prompting the agency to reassess its protocols​​.

Campaign insiders report that Trump’s team is considering relocating future rallies to indoor locations to mitigate risks and ensure tighter security. The campaign has been scouting venues like basketball arenas and convention centers for upcoming events​.

Her resignation isn’t the end of this failure for FORMER Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle, who reported to Mayorkas.

She will not get to slither away and enjoy retirement.

Cheatle and Mayorkas will face accountability for actions, including possible criminal… pic.twitter.com/Gr6dwE3q1p

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) July 23, 2024

The incident has sparked a broader debate about the Secret Service’s ability to protect high-profile figures at public gatherings.

Critics argue that the agency should have anticipated such threats and implemented more robust preventive measures. Meanwhile, the Secret Service maintains that it continually evaluates and adjusts its strategies based on evolving threat landscapes​​.

Trump, known for his large and enthusiastic outdoor crowds, expressed disappointment but acknowledged the necessity of the change for safety reasons. His campaign stated they are committed to maintaining high-energy events while prioritizing the security of attendees and the former president.

This shift in rally strategy comes as Trump ramps up his campaign efforts for the 2024 presidential election. With increased scrutiny on security practices, the Secret Service’s actions will be closely watched as they work to prevent any future incidents​.

The post Secret Service Tells Trump to Stop Having Outdoor Rallies appeared first on The Conservative Brief.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) questioned Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters about her refusal to let him interview Peter Navarro on his podcast./Image: Video screenshot.

During Tuesday’s House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) pushed Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters about her refusal to let him interview political prisoner Peter Navarro for his podcast.

Navarro, a renowned economist who worked in the Trump administration and whose report exposed the widespread fraud that took place during the 2020 presidential election, was imprisoned for four months by the Biden regime for failing to comply with a subpoena during Liz Cheney’s shame January 6th investigation.

Last week, Navarro was released and immediately headed for Milwaukee to speak at the RNC where he received a hero’s welcome.

While serving his politically motivated sentence, Rep. Gaetz attempted to arrange an interview with Navarro, but was denied because, according to Federal Bureau of Prisons, Navarro  is “too notorious” for such a meeting to take place.

During the Judiciary Committee hearing, Gaetz pushed Peters on her decision.

Rep. Gaetz: Director Peters, do you remember telling me that Peter Navarro was “too notorious” when I wanted to interview him during his incarceration?

Peters: Congressman, we had a long conversation about your desire to have us help facilitate Mr. Strand to appear on your podcast. Nope,nope, no this is Navarro.

Rep. Gaetz: I’m asking about Mr. Navarro. Do you remember telling me he was too notorious?

Peters: Oh, sorry. Congressman, yes.

Rep. Gaetz: I want to get into how you determine that an inmate is too notorious for an interview or not too notorious for an interview. What is the standard that you apply?

Peters: So, congressman, I think it’s really important for the committee to understand that the request was about him appearing on a podcast. It wasn’t about facilitating a meeting with the two of you, which my office followed up and said we would clearly facilitate. There’s only one avenue, as we talked about in our policy, around being able to appear on a podcast, and that’s our media policy. And you, with your personal podcast, that is not official…..

Rep. Gaetz: No, it’s my official podcast. Members of Congress do podcasts to function as video newsletters to tell the American people what’s going on? So I wanted to interview Navarro. You said he was too notorious. You’ve acknowledged that was the basis. So I want to know now what test you apply to determine that someone is or is not too notorious.

Peters: Again, congressman, while I shared that information with you in a one-on-one briefing, the crux of the denial was that we were not able to help facilitate an incarcerated individual to appear on a podcast.

Rep. Gaetz: No, no, no. That wasn’t what you said. You said it was… You acknowledged it was this notoriety factor. The reason I ask is because Michael Avenatti gave an interview from federal prison. I guess, why is it that Michael Avenatti is authorized to do an interview from federal prison, but Peter Navarro isn’t.

Peters: Congressman, I met with you to be as helpful as possible to discuss…

Rep. Gaetz: That wasn’t helpful.

No, because here’s what it looks like. You’ve acknowledged that the reason you didn’t let me interview Navarro was because you said he was too notorious. And then I’ve spent more than a minute trying to get you to explain what the test is for that notoriety. And you can’t explain one. You just keep going back to, ‘Well, we couldn’t facilitate you. We’re trying to be helpful.’ That wasn’t helpful.

And when you have standards that are subject to just any interpretation you want, then you carry with the entire bureau the belief that you guys are just being arbitrary. Because when John Gotti is allowed to do an interview for federal prison and Peter Navarro isn’t, it’s hard to ascertain how Gotti would be less notorious.

It animates the concern that you heard expressed by the chairman, whether it’s Galanis or Navarro or Bannon or whomever. Whatever, that you guys are trying to make it harder on people who are expressing views that you don’t particularly like. That’s going to be a prop. We’re going to have to put into law or oversight or something the ability to get to these people because we’re not going to accept just you making a determination that Avenatti is not too notorious, but Navarro is.

Watch:

Gaetz also pushed Peters to commit to allowing him to interview Steve Bannon, who currently sits in prison for his refusal to testify before the sham committee.

Rep. Gaetz: You heard the chairman say in his opening remarks that we want to go to Danbury Prison in Connecticut, and we want to go there to see Mr. Bannon. Is there going to be any problem in the next few weeks approving a visit with the chairman of this committee to go to Danbury?

Peters: As the congressman and I talked about during a one-on-one conversation yesterday, and as I will say to the Committee, we will be happy to review that request and make that accommodation as you submit that request to the Office of Legislative Affairs.

Rep. Gaetz: Okay, I appreciate the commitment to review it, but are you committing to approve it?

Peters: Congressmen, those approvals actually happen through the Office of Legislative affairs….

Rep. Gaetz: They work for you.

Peters: I can’t foresee an issue with the approval of that.

Rep. Gaetz: This is a legislative affair. You’re testifying before your oversight subcommittee. Why don’t you just tell us that you’ll approve our trip to go to Danbury?

Peters: That approval rests with the Department. We have a long-standing process of reviewing.

Rep. Gaetz: You lead the Department. There’s not some other person. You’re the head of the Department. Why can’t you just say we can go?

Peters: We have a long-standing process of those requests being reviewed by the department, and I will encourage my team to work closely with the Department in reviewing that request.

Rep. Gaetz: That is just a total non-answer. I mean, this is what we get, Mr. Chairman. This is what we get. Arbitrary standards, non-answers, and frankly, if we continue to fund it and tolerate, it’s all we’re going to get. I would encourage some robust oversight here. I would not want to be in a position where you guys denied this request.

Finally, I would just say with my final few seconds, Mr. Biggs and I were in really one of the most impressive prisons in the world, Saccat in El Salvador, and there was concern expressed by the Minister of Justice there that that the Mexican Mafia is operating out of our prisons, and they’re able to conduct criminal enterprises and use communication capabilities.

So I hope you would just take for the record, perhaps, a review of what the Mexican Mafia’s activities are. I’d love to hear about it. Finally, just want to echo everyone on the committee’s very thoughtful and appropriate remarks about our colleague, Sheila Jackson Lee. It only seems appropriate to offer that after the gavel has been wrong because that’s when Ms. Jackson-Lea did some of her most outstanding work. I yield back.

Watch:

BREAKING: Federal Bureau of Prisons Director REFUSES to commit to allowing Congress to see Steve Bannon in prison! pic.twitter.com/Oz68zXxYXZ

— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) July 23, 2024

 

The post Matt Gaetz Pushes Federal Bureau of Prisons Director About Refusal To Let Him Interview Political Prisoner Peter Navarro, Presses for Answer to Interview Steve Bannon (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Kamala Harris kept hundreds of black men in prison longer than their release date so the state could have cheap labor. This photo is a collage of the black men she kept in bondage past their release date.

Kamala Harris kept hundreds of black men in prison past their release date so she could use these men for $2 a day for cheap California state labor.

That alone should have disqualified Kamala Harris from public office.
Extending prison sentences for cheap labor sounds like criminal activity.

Back in February 2019 Jackie Kucinich at The Daily Beast wrote about Kamala Harris’s Attorney General office keeping inmates locked up so the state could use them for cheap labor.

Just like slavers.

Kamala also locked up 1,500 people for marijuana violations.

The Daily Beast reported this in February 2019:

Ordered to reduce the population of California’s overcrowded prisons, lawyers from then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office made the case that some non-violent offenders needed to stay incarcerated or else the prison system would lose a source of cheap labor.

In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Plata that California’s prisons were so overcrowded that they violated the Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Three years later, in early 2014, the state was ordered to allow non-violent, second time offenders who have served half of their sentence to be eligible for parole.

By September 2014, plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit were back in court, accusing California of slow-walking the process, which lawyers for Harris’ office denied.

According to court filings, lawyers for the state said California met benchmarks, and argued that if certain potential parolees were given a faster track out of prison, it would negatively affect the prison’s labor programs, including one that allowed certain inmates to fight California’s wildfires for about $2 a day.

“Extending 2-for-1 credits to all minimum custody inmates at this time would severely impact fire camp participation—a dangerous outcome while California is in the middle of a difficult fire season and severe drought,” lawyers for Harris wrote in the filing, noting that the fire camp program required physical fitness in addition to a level of clearance that allowed the felon to be offsite.

Not only that, they noted, draining the prisons of “minimum custody inmates” would deplete the labor force both internally and in local communities where low-level, non-violent offenders worked for pennies on the dollar collecting trash and tending to city parks. A federal three-judge panel ordered both sides to confer about the plaintiffs’ demands, and the state agreed to extend the 2-for-1 credits to all eligible minimum security prisoners.

This is the Democrat Party’s nominee for President of the United States!

And, far left VICE released video back in October 2019 as Kamala’s presidential campaign was swirling down the toilet.

According to VICE — Back when she was San Francisco D.A., U.S. Senator Kamala Harris, now a presidential contender and a self-described “progressive prosecutor,” cost the city of San Francisco millions of dollars and cost Jamal Trulove more than six years of his life. Harris allowed the people working under her to pursue a murder charge against Trulove that was ultimately overturned by an appeals court. Harris has yet to account for this incident.

Democrats are trying to make the public believe Kamala is for the minority and black communities. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The post NEVER FORGET… Kamala Harris Kept Black Men in Prison Past Their Release Date in California So She Could Milk Them for Cheap Labor appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.