“I’ve Heard From Him” – Biden When Asked If It’s Acceptable That He Hasn’t Heard From the Secret Service Director Since Trump Assassination Attempt – The SS Director is a WOMAN! (VIDEO)

Joe Biden sat down for an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt to discuss the assassination attempt against President Trump.

A bullet grazed President Trump’s ear on Saturday during his Pennsylvania rally.

In an appalling breach of security, a gunman was able to climb on top of a roof next to Trump’s Butler, Pennsylvania rally and put Trump in his scope.

President Trump raised his fist and shouted, “Fight! Fight! Fight!” after a bullet grazed his ear.

WATCH:

Trump just got shot in the head and got up like a fucking gangster and fist pumped

pic.twitter.com/3TAzY5mI5E

— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) July 13, 2024

Lester Holt asked Biden if it is acceptable that he has not heard from his DEI Secret Service Director.

“Is it acceptable that you have still not heard, at least publicly, from the Secret Service Director?” Lester Holt asked Biden.

“Oh, I’ve heard from him,” Biden said.

The Secret Service Director, Kimberly Cheatle, is a WOMAN!

Lester Holt swooped in to save Joe Biden: “Have you heard from her publicly?”

Biden looked spooked as he realized the Secret Service Director is not a “he.”

He quickly thought of a lie.

“Publicly I’ve sat down in the Situation Room downstairs – the Secret Service, the FBI, National Security agencies – Homeland Security – all the major elements,” Biden said.

WATCH:

“Is it acceptable that you have still not heard, at least publicly, from the Secret Service Director?”

BIDEN: “Oh, I’ve heard from him.”

The Director of Secret Service is a woman. pic.twitter.com/pkO5VnkddN

— Bobby LaValley (@Bobby_LaVallley) July 16, 2024

The post “I’ve Heard From Him” – Biden When Asked If It’s Acceptable That He Hasn’t Heard From the Secret Service Director Since Trump Assassination Attempt – The SS Director is a WOMAN! (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Return of Reformists in Iran: A Path to Diplomatic Engagement?

The Return of Reformists in Iran: A Path to Diplomatic Engagement?

Negotiations will be more complex than in 2015, but are still the best chance for regional stability and safety.


Credit: Borna_Mirahmadian

The unexpected return of reformists to power in Iran has sparked renewed hopes for diplomatic engagement and a new agreement between Iran and the West concerning Tehran’s rapidly expanding nuclear program. During his campaign, President-elect Masoud Pezeshkian vowed to pursue diplomatic negotiations to lift economic sanctions on Iran. The involvement of Javad Zarif and his former deputy, Abbas Araghchi—both central figures in the original Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) negotiations and likely candidates for significant roles in Pezeshkian’s administration—signifies a serious commitment to renewed diplomacy with the West.

Kamal Kharrazi, the head of Iran’s Strategic Council of Foreign Relations and an advisor to the supreme leader, has emphasized the importance of lifting sanctions in his congratulatory message to Pezeshkian. Kharrazi’s message has been perceived as an indication that the Supreme Leader is also likely to support a new round of negotiations aimed at sanctions relief in exchange for concessions on Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Despite these positive signals, the road to a new deal is fraught with challenges, requiring substantial political will and compromise from both Tehran and Washington. Since the U.S. withdrawal from the agreement in 2018, Iran’s nuclear program has advanced substantially. As a result, a new deal cannot simply reinstate the prior restrictions or return to the original breakout times outlined in the JCPOA. Tehran’s enhanced nuclear capabilities and technological progress have outpaced earlier limits. Consequently, Washington must recalibrate its objectives to align with this evolved reality. The primary goal should be to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon by containing its program, rolling it back as much as feasible, and enhancing monitoring and inspections to quickly detect any breaches or attempts at weaponization.

Negotiations over sanctions relief will be complex, given Tehran’s experiences with past U.S. administrations. The failed 2021–22 negotiations under the Biden administration to restore the JCPOA highlighted Iran’s insistence on verification mechanisms and guarantees to prevent future American withdrawal. Nevertheless, securing such guarantees will be impossible without the backing of the U.S. Congress, which remains largely opposed to easing sanctions on Iran. For these talks to succeed, innovative approaches must be developed both in terms of the scope of the agreement and the mechanisms for verifying compliance and ensuring some of the economic benefits Iran seeks from a deal.

The political landscape in both Tehran and Washington offers limited maneuverability for a new nuclear deal. In both capitals, significant resistance is anticipated against any agreement. Even if negotiations commence immediately after Pezeshkian’s administration takes office, President Biden is unlikely to commit to serious talks with the November election approaching. Likewise, Iranian officials are expected to withhold major concessions until the election outcomes are clear, preferring to maintain leverage for subsequent negotiations with a potential Trump administration. Both the U.S. Congress and the Iranian parliament are poised to oppose any new deal vigorously. Consequently, Pezeshkian and the next U.S. president will confront the formidable challenge of advocating for a new deal amidst opposition within their respective capitals.

Another critical factor for Tehran will be its relationship with Moscow. Iran has deepened its ties with Russia, particularly since the onset of the conflict in Ukraine, by supplying military drones used against Ukrainian targets. Russia has facilitated Iran’s integration into multilateral forums like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS+, and has been working with Iran on evading Western sanctions. It is improbable that Iran’s military and security establishments, along with the supreme leader, would endorse a deal that significantly undermines its relations with Moscow.

The West must strategically separate its tensions with Moscow over Ukraine from its negotiations with Iran. Maintaining the integrity of the P5+1 framework is essential for coordinating efforts to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons—a scenario that would destabilize the region further and is also not in Moscow’s interests.

Opponents of negotiations with Iran in Washington argue that any sanctions relief will empower a regime known for suppressing its citizens’ rights and supporting anti-Israel militia groups across the region. While these concerns are valid, there is no better short-term alternative to contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions than a limited negotiated agreement aimed at preventing the Islamic Republic from acquiring a nuclear weapon for as long as possible. Achieving such a deal not only forestalls the immediate threat but also empowers moderate voices in Tehran and creates an opportunity for future negotiations over other malign activities of the Iranian regime. Without an agreement, the region faces the risk of dealing with a more belligerent Islamic Republic with nuclear capabilities. The costs of failing to reach an agreement are far too great for the region.

The post The Return of Reformists in Iran: A Path to Diplomatic Engagement? appeared first on The American Conservative.

The Revolutionary Change in the RNC Platform

The Revolutionary Change in the RNC Platform

While social and economic points carried the news cycle, it is the GOP’s fresh foreign policy that shows the party’s new direction.

When I caught an early morning flight from Boise, Idaho to Milwaukee, Wisconsin, I had one goal in mind: to help craft a Republican Party platform that reflected an America First foreign policy.

A lot of ink has been spilled in the past week about changes in the party platform related to social issues, along with discussions about how the GOP under Donald Trump has modified positions like trade and entitlements. But too little has been said about the policy program the president has the most control over—functionally more than the Constitution permits—and the decisions that’ll be life or death for Americans in uniform.

This year, in a reversal of standard practice, the Republican National Committee presented delegates with a finished product. The platform committee approved the document in less than an hour with no amendments and only a few minutes of debate.

Written in Donald Trump’s familiar style, the entire platform cover to cover is a mere sixteen pages, fifty shorter than the most recent 2016 platform. But its brevity matches its clarity.

The 2016 platform reads like a warmed-over Weekly Standard editorial circa 2002, with the same apologia for the crimes of the Bush administration and the wayward wishful thinking that has defined our post-Cold War policymakers. In sharp contrast, the new 2024 platform, with MAGA gusto, promises to use “that great [military] strength sparingly, and only in clear instances where our National Interests are threatened…” Furthermore, it acknowledges the wisdom that “War breeds inflation,” and that the goal of a second Trump term is to “PREVENT WORLD WAR THREE, RESTORE PEACE IN EUROPE AND IN THE MIDDLE EAST….”

I unequivocally support these beliefs, and that’s why I voted in favor of adopting the platform.

Traditionally, a national party platform is more than the president’s personal pitch to voters; it is meant to be a detailed document that local and state candidates can utilize to guide campaigns and shape policy.

As a delegate to the platform committee, I had planned to introduce and argue for specific planks in the foreign policy section to bolster conservatives fighting on the ground and provide auxiliary support for Donald Trump’s stated goals.

That is what I already accomplished last month at the Idaho Republican State Convention, where I successfully led a movement among delegates to include in our party platform a demand that Congress declare war before our state’s National Guard is deployed into combat and defined the governor’s duty to use the National Guard to repel the invasion at our border.

The following prescriptions don’t carry formal weight from the RNC, but they are the views of one veteran and lifelong Republican, and are representative of millions of other veterans and conservatives who seek to restore a semblance of the old, humble republic of our Founding Fathers.

With an invasion at our southern border threatening the territorial integrity of our nation, a national debt growing by billions every second, and deaths of despair sapping away the moral fiber of the American people, we must turn our eyes and our faith back to our own country before it is too late.

America First is not a new or untried idea. It was advocated by George Washington. It was incorporated in the Monroe Doctrine. It was consummated in Donald Trump’s first term. Under its banner, the United States became the strongest and most independent nation in the world.

The Republican Party, under the direction of the president acting as commander-in-chief, will mobilize the National Guard to repel the invasion at our southern border, including defending American land and citizens from cartels and other hostile adversaries.

For almost seventy-five years the American public has been subjected to the odium and infamy of undeclared warfare. Offensive wars of choice must be authorized with a declaration of war by Congress and signed by the president. The people must give informed consent through their elected representatives before America spills blood and treasure on foreign soil. Undeclared wars by unilateral executive decision are antithetical to America First.

The imperial project of neoconservatism and liberal globalism was permanently discredited when empty formulae met reality in the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan.

The Republican Party rejects the spreading of American policy through alien methods; we are unwilling to tyrannize this country in a vain project to de-tyrannize the rest of the world.

From a military standpoint, the United States’ natural geography makes it better situated than any other nation in the world. Even in the Biden administration’s present condition of unpreparedness, no foreign power is able to diminish the political or economic independence of the American people. If we concentrate on our own defense and build the strength that this nation should maintain on its own border and in its own hemisphere, no foreign nation will ever be able to displace us economically or militarily.

The Republican Party earnestly condemns the policy of the present administration in Ukraine as reckless, provocative, and avoidable.

The resuscitation and expansion of the NATO alliance at the direction of the Biden White House invites the United States back to Old Europe, with its lack of political resolve and inability to meet defense spending parameters, in a policy where the American people are asked to furnish their money, their means, and their men to defend a wealthy continent.

If an administration may with impunity ignore the crisis which most animates the public—the unrestricted invasion of the U.S. southern border—and deliberately create a condition of war anywhere on the globe, organize a censorship campaign to suppress the truth, and demand of all citizens a suspension of good judgment and their unanimous support while it chooses to continue a fight undeclared by Congress, then representative government itself is imperiled.

Much as we abhor Russia’s criminal war against Ukraine, and greatly as we regret the blood spilled in Eastern Europe, we more deeply resent the betrayal of American institutions at home. The real firing line is not in the suburbs of Kiev. The foe is in our own household. The Democratic attempt of 1861 was to divide the country. The Democratic attempt of 2024 is to destroy its fundamental principles and domestic security in pursuit of globalism and endless war.

We denounce the mercenary system of foreign policy under the current administration and its indulgence of the military-industrial complex identified by President Dwight D. Eisenhower and reprimanded by President Donald Trump. The exploitation of the U.S. Armed Forces by high finance and politically-connected government contractors degrades their moral standing while a program of military Keynesianism disrupts the economy. Under a return to a Republican administration, patriotism will be given precedence over swollen profits.

As Donald Trump is set to receive the Republican nomination for a third time—only the second man to accomplish that feat, after Richard Nixon—I hope that the American people are given this election season a thorough treatment of our country’s role in the world, accountability for the past two decades of disaster, and a thoughtful alternative of America First.

The post The Revolutionary Change in the RNC Platform appeared first on The American Conservative.

The Missed Opportunity for Peace at NATO’s Washington Summit

The Missed Opportunity for Peace at NATO’s Washington Summit

The Biden administration is committed to continuing its errors in Ukraine.

Last week, NATO held a summit in Washington celebrating its 75th anniversary. As at other recent summits, the alliance reaffirmed its promise that Ukraine will become a member of NATO at some undisclosed future date. While Ukrainians have shown admirable courage resisting Russia’s invasion of their country, NATO’s insistence that Ukraine will one day join the alliance only incentivizes Russia to continue its aggression. Rather than working to bring about a negotiated settlement, NATO’s policy, driven largely by the Biden administration, will ensure the slaughter in Ukraine continues.

For decades, Russian officials made clear that putting Ukraine in NATO would cross a red line. William J. Burns, then U.S. ambassador to Russia and the current CIA director, candidly asserted in 2008 that,

Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all redlines for the Russian elite (not just Putin). In more than two and a half years of conversations with key Russian players, from knuckle-draggers in the dark recesses of the Kremlin to Putin’s sharpest liberal critics, I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests.

Yet U.S. officials ignored Burns’s astute observation. Despite strong Russian protestations, NATO allies agreed at the 2008 Bucharest summit that both Ukraine and Georgia would become members of the alliance. That fateful decision fundamentally altered Moscow’s threat perception of the United States and NATO. The Washington foreign policy establishment may scoff at the idea that expanding NATO to include Ukraine and Georgia poses a threat to Russia; nevertheless, prudent statecraft requires one to consider how adversaries will perceive and react to your actions.

Adding new countries to NATO should not be an end in itself. Countries should only be invited to join the alliance when doing so improves the security of current members. Ukraine’s addition would do the exact opposite and heighten the risk of a direct NATO–Russia war. The Biden administration’s support of NATO’s promise to bring Ukraine into the alliance at some future date presents a clear logical inconsistency. If Biden believes it is in the U.S. national interest to send American troops to fight and die for Ukraine in the future, why is it not in the U.S. national interest to do so now while Ukraine is being actively attacked?

The simple answer is because it is not in America’s interest to fight a war against Russia—a country that possesses over 5,000 nuclear weapons— on behalf of Ukraine, either now or in the future. Dangling NATO membership to Ukraine is the worst of both worlds. It reinforces Russia’s aggression, provides the hardliners in Moscow with an easy propaganda victory that Russia’s fight is actually with NATO, and leads Ukraine further down a path of false promises and destruction of their country. 

Despite estimates that both sides have suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties, neither Russia nor Ukraine has been able to achieve a decisive victory on the battlefield. As Ukraine’s former Army Commander in Chief Valery Zaluzhny observed in late 2023, the war has reached a stalemate. While Ukraine has proven that it is capable of inflicting significant damage on Russian forces, basic battlefield dynamics as well as the realities of manpower and industrial capacity suggest that Ukraine is unlikely to achieve its stated objective to expel all Russian troops and reclaim all occupied territory, including Crimea. Yet, Russia too, has failed to achieve its objective of regime change in Ukraine, and Moscow has been unable to consolidate control over the four Ukrainian oblasts it annexed in 2022.

History teaches us that most wars end at the negotiating table. For Ukraine, the principal bargaining chip it possesses is a commitment to forgo its NATO aspirations and adopt a policy of neutrality. Indeed, before the war, Moscow proposed a list of security guarantees to lower tensions in Europe which included ruling out Ukraine’s accession into NATO. After the war broke out, Russian and Ukrainian negotiators met in April 2022 to discuss a peace deal, with the Ukrainian side offering to pledge that it would never join NATO. Although the talks did not result in a conclusive peace treaty, probably due in part to Western pressure on Kiev, the reality is that Ukraine was prepared to trade its unlikely NATO hopes for neutrality and peace. This offer remains the key to negotiating an end to the conflict.   

The Washington NATO summit was a prime opportunity for the alliance and Ukraine to work in tandem to develop a serious diplomatic proposal to end the war, rather than encourage further suffering, death, and devastation. For its part, the Biden administration should have found the courage to lead the alliance to this conclusion. Unfortunately, the meat grinder in Ukraine can be expected to continue.

The post The Missed Opportunity for Peace at NATO’s Washington Summit appeared first on The American Conservative.

President Trump Takes the Stage at the RNC Convention with Bandaged Ear to Thunderous Applause (VIDEO)

President Trump and his family took the stage at the RNC Convention in Milwaukee to thunderous applause Monday evening.

This is President Trump’s first public appearance since the attempted assassination.

President Trump arrived in Milwaukee on Sunday just 24 hours after an attempted assassination.

A bullet took a chunk of Trump’s ear off after a gunman climbed a roof and shot at Trump from an elevated position during Saturday’s Pennsylvania rally.

Trump entered the convention with a bandage on his ear.

WATCH:

BREAKING: Donald Trump enters the RNC Convention with a bandage on his ear after assassination attempt

pic.twitter.com/E5u9DPQkLd

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 16, 2024

Trump’s family joined him on stage.

WATCH:

WOW—Happening now at the 2024 Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. #RNCConvention pic.twitter.com/WkcXT6OtgI

— Dan Scavino Jr. (@DanScavino) July 16, 2024

American singer and songwriter Lee Greenwood gave an incredible introduction to President Trump.

WATCH:

Lee Greenwood gives an incredible introduction to Donald Trump as he enters the RNC Convention

Grab your tissues. pic.twitter.com/tgrwlCG1K7

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 16, 2024

The GOP officially nominated Donald Trump as its presidential nominee on Monday at the RNC convention in Milwaukee.

Trump was nominated shortly after he announced JD Vance as his running mate.

The post President Trump Takes the Stage at the RNC Convention with Bandaged Ear to Thunderous Applause (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Meathead Rob Reiner and Other Hollywood Liberals Lose Their Minds Over Dismissal of Trump Documents Case

Now that the Jack Smith classified documents case against Trump has been dismissed, some people on the left are in total meltdown mode.

Things are especially bad in Hollywood.

Noted Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferer Rob Reiner and his fellow travelers in the entertainment industry are losing what’s left of their minds.

Breitbart News reports:

Hollywood Celebrities Freak over Dismissal of Trump Documents Case: ‘We Are Officially a Banana Republic’

Self-awareness was in short supply Monday as left-wing Hollywood celebrities freaked out over a federal court’s decision to dismiss the “documents” case against former President Donald Trump, with various stars claiming the ruling represented the politicization of the judicial system.

Absent from their vitriol was any mention of how the Biden administration has weaponized the judiciary against former President Donald Trump in an apparent attempt to hurt his chances of winning back the White House in November. Many of the same celebrities have cheered the recent lawfare indictments against Trump, with some wishing to see him end up behind bars.

On Monday, the stars were in no mood for self-reflection as they decried the Florida federal court’s ruling that throws out Biden administration appointee Jack Smith’s case against the 45th president.

Take a look at their tweets below:

Rob Reiner

With Judge Cannon’s dismissal of the Trump stolen documents case, we’re seeing the beginning of the end of the Rule of Law in America.

— Rob Reiner (@robreiner) July 15, 2024

Kathy Griffin

Tell me again how the founders thought of everything. https://t.co/U5rlGHWwKN

— Kathy Griffin (@kathygriffin) July 15, 2024

Bette Midler

Like a slow moving train wreck, brick by brick they are dismantling these United States. What they don’t realize is what a horrible world they will get when they get what they think they want. https://t.co/KV2SsCp9TR

— bettemidler (@BetteMidler) July 15, 2024

Stephen King

I fear for my country.

— Stephen King (@StephenKing) July 15, 2024

Jon Cryer

When you appoint the judges, you get away with the crimes.

— Jon Cryer (@MrJonCryer) July 15, 2024

Mia Farrow

Jaw dropper.
Judge Aileen Cannon has dismissed the entire Trump classified documents case. She claims the case should be thrown out because the appointment of special counsel Jack Smith violates the Constitution. Her decision is sure to be appealed. https://t.co/Xm8xmNULy0

— Mia Farrow ️‍ (@MiaFarrow) July 15, 2024

Daryl Hannah

The stupid doesn’t seem to stop
11th circuit make it stop https://t.co/VlwcHjiAc0

— Daryl Hannah (@dhlovelife) July 15, 2024

These people just can’t help themselves. It’s sad.

The post Meathead Rob Reiner and Other Hollywood Liberals Lose Their Minds Over Dismissal of Trump Documents Case appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Failed Trump Assassin Purchased Ladder and 50 Rounds of Ammo on the Morning of the Rally, According to New Report

Failed Trump assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks appears to have purchased the ladder he used to scale the building and 50 rounds of ammunition on the morning of the Butler, Pennsylvania, rally.

According to a report from CNN citing law enforcement officials, Crooks bought the ladder from Home Depot on the day he tried to assassinate Trump from the roof of a nearby building.

If this report is accurate and to be believed, Crooks may have made it past law enforcement and the Secret Service carrying a very tall ladder and used it to climb the building unnoticed.

CNN reports:

On Friday, he went to a shooting range where he was a member, and practiced firing, a law enforcement official told CNN. The next morning, Crooks went to a Home Depot, where he bought a five-foot ladder, and a gun store, where he purchased 50 rounds of ammunition, the official said.

Then, Crooks drove his Hyundai Sonata about an hour north, joining thousands of people from around the region who flocked to Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. He parked the car outside the rally, with an improvised explosive device hidden in the trunk that was wired to a transmitter he carried, the official said. Then, investigators believe, he used his newly-bought ladder to scale a nearby building, and opened fire on the former president.

The report noted, “It’s not clear whether Crooks used the ammunition or the ladder that he bought on Saturday during his attack later that day.” However, a ladder was prominently propped up against the building where Crooks would shoot from.

Crooks also had a detonator on his person and explosives attached to a receiver in his vehicle’s trunk.

Oddly, the report says that no motives have been found for the shooting and that his online history does not reveal a “political or ideological impetus for the shooting.” His activities online suggest an interest in coding and gaming.

There is no evidence of him searching online for how to create an explosive device, the report claims.

The gun that Crooks used was legally purchased and owned by his father.

The report concluded, “The shooter’s parents, who have been cooperating with law enforcement since the shooting, have told investigators that Crooks did not appear to have friends and did not appear to have any political leanings, a law enforcement official told CNN. But they didn’t seem to know much about what was going on in his life recently, law enforcement sources said.”

The post Failed Trump Assassin Purchased Ladder and 50 Rounds of Ammo on the Morning of the Rally, According to New Report appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

MSNBC Wingnut Joy Reid Absolves Her Network of All Blame, Calls Trump Greatest Promoter of Political Violence (VIDEO)

MSNBC is at the Republican National Convention this week and Joy Reid is being allowed to speak for some reason.

Last week she was comparing Trump to Hitler and tonight she is claiming that Trump is the greatest promoter of political violence. The man was shot just days ago, but she is blaming him for political violence. She also took the opportunity to absolve MSNBC of all blame in the lack of confidence in the media.

How does this woman still have a job talking about politics on TV?

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

I will say that the kind of universal kind of reaction that I’m getting, whether it’s civilians or, you know, professionals, is really a deep concern and lack of confidence in not us at this table or us at MSNBC, but us as the media writ large. And a fear that what’s going to happen now is that the Republican Party will do what they do.

They’re in the middle of a campaign. They’re, you know, the convention started today. That the media will acquiesce to trying to convince people that the things they’ve been experiencing for the last, you know, five, six years didn’t happen.

That the greatest purveyor and promoter of political violence really, you know, since anyone can remember, since George Wallace, I think, you know, that we just haven’t experienced that kind of open, you know, sort of incitement of violence or sort of luxuriating in the idea of violence. It’s just not something we’re used to anymore in American politics. And then we had to get used to that being a thing.

And people are concerned and expressing concern that we won’t be the guardians of memory. And that we will allow Donald Trump, as he is, you know, bathed in the glory and grandeur of his party, to rewrite himself as both a hero and a victim. That people who are the most vulnerable to not just the things he’s done, but the things he’s promising to do.

Here’s the video:

Joy Reid: Donald Trump Is “The Greatest Purveyor And Promoter Of Political Violence”https://t.co/OarCwAvoJi pic.twitter.com/Wa32DVSO2c

— RCP Video (@rcpvideo) July 16, 2024

Joy lives in an alternate reality. It’s amazing that anyone listens to her.

The post MSNBC Wingnut Joy Reid Absolves Her Network of All Blame, Calls Trump Greatest Promoter of Political Violence (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Rep. Boebert Introduces Legislation to Hold Secret Service Director Accountable for Trump Shooting

Credit: Gage Skidmore

Rep. Lauren Boebert has introduced legislation to hold Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle accountable for the agency’s failure to protect President Trump during Saturday’s Butler, Pennsylvania, campaign rally.

The Secret Service Accountability Act explicitly prohibits any federal funds from being used to pay the salary or expenses of Kimberly Cheatle, the Director of the United States Secret Service.

A press release from the congresswoman’s office explains, “According to the United States Secret Service agency website, Cheatle is responsible for executing the agency’s integrated mission of ‘protection and investigations by leading a diverse workforce.’ Cheatle is directly responsible for prioritizing woke DEI practices rather than focusing on hiring the best people to work for the agency.”

Boebert’s office noted that House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer has asked Director Cheatle to appear before the Committee on Monday, July 22, “to answer questions about the security failures that led to the failed assassination attempt on President Trump.”

“Saturday’s assassination attempt on President Trump’s life was either intentional or the result of gross incompetence by the United States Secret Service. Under Director Cheatle’s failed leadership, the United States Secret Service has prioritized woke DEI policies over the core responsibilities of the Secret Service, including protecting our nation’s leaders. This lack of leadership contributed to the first assassination attempt of a President in 43 years. Director Cheatle has got to go!” Rep. Boebert said of the legislation.

The Secret Service Accountability Act is co-sponsored by South Carolina Rep. Jeff Duncan, Tennessee Rep. Diana Harshbarger, Florida Rep. Cory Mills, Tennessee Rep. Tim Burchett, Alabama Rep. Barry Moore, Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles, Oklahoma Rep. Josh Brecheen, and Florida Rep. Bill Posey.

The post Rep. Boebert Introduces Legislation to Hold Secret Service Director Accountable for Trump Shooting appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Elon Musk Reportedly Plans to Donate Approximately $45 Million a Month to New Pro-Trump Super PAC

Elon Musk reportedly plans to donate approximately $45 million per month to a new pro-Trump Super PAC.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, the brand new America PAC is also backed by Palantir Technologies co-founder Joe Lonsdale, former U.S. ambassador to Canada Kelly Craft and her husband, Joe Craft, who is chief executive of coal producer Alliance Resource Partners, and the Winklevoss twins.

The report explains that the America PAC was formed in June and focuses on registering voters, convincing them to vote early, and requesting mail-in ballots in swing states.

WSJ reports, “The coalition assessed that the Democrats have historically had very robust “get out the vote” campaigns and took note of the amounts of money that the Biden administration has dedicated to so-called “on the ground” efforts in swing states. America PAC will try to counter that.”

Musk has reportedly already donated to the PAC, but he was not listed on a Monday filing that shows it has raised over $8 million, according to a report from Reuters.

The report added that Lonsdale Enterprises and the Winklevoss Twins were listed as donors—Lonsdale donated $1 million, and Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss each pitched in $250,000.

Musk endorsed Trump shortly after the former president was shot at his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday.

I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery pic.twitter.com/ZdxkF63EqF

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 13, 2024

“I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery,” Musk wrote on X.

Last time America had a candidate this tough was Theodore Roosevelt

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 13, 2024

In a follow-up post, Musk wrote, “The Last time America had a candidate this tough was Theodore Roosevelt.”

The post Elon Musk Reportedly Plans to Donate Approximately $45 Million a Month to New Pro-Trump Super PAC appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.