President Trump Calls on Congress to Defund “Horrible” NPR and PBS: “Rid Our Country of This Giant SCAM, Both Being Arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party”

President Trump has called on Congress to “immediately” defund National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) following a House Oversight DOGE subcommittee hearing, which exposed the stations’ already well-known bias and radical content.

Don’t miss this opportunity to rid our Country of this giant SCAM, both being arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party,” the President told Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Republicans on the committee grilled NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger on Wednesday over their anti-Trump bias and the extreme, woke programming on the stations. This includes documentaries about transvestites and transitioning, “Racist Trees,” and exposing young children, including toddlers, to so-called educational programming that featured a cross-dressing freak.

Meanwhile, the Democrats defended this depravity, decried Republicans for exposing the garbage that taxpayers are funding, and ranted about saving Elmo. Far-left dummy Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) lost it at one point and went on a vulgar race-baiting tirade, where she called the GOP’s agenda “bullsh*t.

At one point, NPR CEO Paula Kerger lied under oath about their transgender programming for three-year-olds, but Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who chairs the subcommittee examining the waste and abuse of tax dollars, brought the receipts.

Greene played a clip for the committee that showed the “predator” cross-dresser luring young children by singing a spin-off of ‘Wheels on the Bus,’ shaking his hips and shoulders, and showing a close-up shot of his mouth. “The hips on the drag queen, go, swish, swish, swish, swish, swish, swish” and “the shoulders on the drag queen, go, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy. The mouth on the drag queen goes blah blah blah all through the town,” he sang to the little boys and girls.

WATCH: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Plays SICK PBS Programming That Indoctrinates 3 Year-Old-Children With Drag Queens After PBS CEO Lies Under Oath in DOGE Hearing

What kind of weirdo wants young children exposed to this perverted content?

Greene, in her closing statement on Wednesday, demanded “the complete and total defund and dismantling of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.” She added, “Every single day, private businesses operate on their own without government funding. We believe that you all can hate us on your own dime.”

After the hearing, President Trump concurred with Greene and demanded that the Republicans in Congress “JUST SAY NO” and defund the biased leftwing propaganda stations.

Trump: NPR and PBS, two horrible and completely biased platforms (Networks!), should be DEFUNDED by Congress, IMMEDIATELY. Republicans, don’t miss this opportunity to rid our Country of this giant SCAM, both being arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party. JUST SAY NO AND, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!

The post President Trump Calls on Congress to Defund “Horrible” NPR and PBS: “Rid Our Country of This Giant SCAM, Both Being Arms of the Radical Left Democrat Party” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Utah Becomes First State to Ban Fluoride in Public Water Supply

Utah made history on Thursday by becoming the first state in the nation to ban the addition of fluoride to its public water systems.

The ban does not remove naturally occurring fluoride from public water but prohibits artificially adding it.

Governor Spencer Cox has signed the bill into law, which will take effect on May 7, 2025.

State Representative Kari Lisonbee and Senator Kirk Cullimore introduced the legislation on the grounds of “personal liberty and clean water.”

“This is about giving Utahns the right to choose what goes into their bodies,” Rep. Lisonbee said in a statement following the bill’s passage. “For too long, we’ve accepted fluoridation without questioning its necessity or safety. Utah is taking a stand for personal liberty and clean water.”

During a legislative session, Sen. Cullimore echoed Rep. Lisonbee’s sentiment, saying, “Communities should have the autonomy to decide what’s best for their water, not have it dictated by outdated mandates.”

“We’ve heard from constituents who want fluoride out, and we’ve delivered.”

United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has previously said water fluoridation is “industrial waste” and vowed that the Trump administration would advise all water systems to remove it.

“On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water,” Kennedy wrote in a post on X back in November. “Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease.”

On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease. President…

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) November 2, 2024

Kennedy added that Donald and Melania Trump want to “Make America Healthy Again.”

The American Dental Association (ADA) has condemned Utah’s decision, with President Linda Edgar stating, “Decades of research show that water fluoridation is safe and one of the most effective ways to prevent tooth decay, especially for children in underserved areas. Utah’s rollback could lead to a dental health crisis.”

The post Utah Becomes First State to Ban Fluoride in Public Water Supply appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Delta Plane Nearly Crashes into Air Force Jet at DCA After January Helicopter Collision

Video shows the moment a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter, left, struck an American Airlines passenger jet, right, on Wednesday night. (CNN / YouTube screen shot)

A Delta Air Lines plane nearly collided midair with a T-38 Air Force jet near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) on Friday in an incident that the FAA is investigating. 

One hundred thirty-one passengers and five crew members were reportedly on board the flight to Minneapolis-St. Paul, as the four T-38 jets performed a flyover several miles from the airport at Arlington National Cemetery.

The near-collision occurred due to a “loss of separation,” meaning the aircraft were closer to each other than allowed by minimum safety standards.

Notably, this comes two months after an American Airlines flight collided with a military helicopter, claiming 67 lives at DCA.

The radical left is blaming President Trump for FAA staffing shortages and the January crash, as well as others that have occurred since. However, as The Gateway Pundit reported, under Biden, the FAA turned away 1,000 air traffic controller applicants because of Marxist DEI policies.

Buttigieg Roasted For Blaming Helicopter-Plane Collision on President Trump After FAA Turned Down 1,000 ATC Applicants Because of DEI Policies

It would appear that incompetent DEI air traffic controllers could be to blame for allowing the passenger jet to depart during the Air Force flyover.

Per Fox:

Delta Air Lines Flight 2983, an Airbus A319 headed to Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSP), departed its DCA gate at 2:55 p.m. local time and was cleared for takeoff around 3:15 p.m., the FAA and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) told Fox News Digital.

Meanwhile, four U.S. Air Force T-38 Talons were inbound to Arlington National Cemetery for a flyover, according to the FAA and U.S. Air Force.

The Delta aircraft received an “onboard alert” that another aircraft was nearby, and air traffic controllers issued corrective instructions to both aircraft, according to the FAA.

The NTSB said it was aware of “a loss of separation” between Delta flight 2983 and other aircraft, shortly after takeoff from DCA.

The post Delta Plane Nearly Crashes into Air Force Jet at DCA After January Helicopter Collision appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Wisconsin AG Sues to Stop Elon Musk’s Million Dollar Voter Check Handouts

Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul has filed a lawsuit to block Elon Musk from awarding $1 million checks to two Wisconsin voters before Tuesday’s state Supreme Court election.

The X owner is working to rally support for conservative Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel.

Kaul’s lawsuit, filed in Dane County Circuit Court, alleges that Musk’s prizes violate Wisconsin state election laws, prohibiting offering anything valuable to influence voter behavior.

The case was originally assigned to Judge Susan Crawford, Schimel’s liberal opponent in the Supreme Court race, but she said she would recuse herself.

Musk announced in an X post on Friday that he would be handing out two $1 million checks to individuals at an event in Wisconsin on Sunday, March 30, 2025, as a gesture of “appreciation for you taking the time to vote.”

BREAKING: Elon Musk will hold a Town Hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin on Sunday at 6:30pm CT. Entrance is limited to those who have signed the petition in opposition to activist judges. It will be livestreamed on . pic.twitter.com/Z9qeGFVLU7

— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) March 28, 2025

“I will also personally hand over two checks for a million dollars each in appreciation for you taking the time to vote. This is super important,” Musk said.

Kaul quickly responded to the news by saying, “The Wisconsin Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that elections in Wisconsin are safe, secure, free, and fair. We are aware of the offer recently posted by Elon Musk to award a million dollars to two people at an event in Wisconsin this weekend.”

Seemingly keeping in line with state law, Musk clarified that the checks were tied to a petition rather than voting directly.

“On Sunday night, I will give a talk in Wisconsin. To clarify a previous post, entrance is limited to those who have signed the petition in opposition to activist judges,” Musk said in his follow-up.

On Sunday night, I will give a talk in Wisconsin.

To clarify a previous post, entrance is limited to those who have signed the petition in opposition to activist judges.

I will also hand over checks for a million dollars to 2 people to be spokesmen for the petition.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 28, 2025

Musk has now said that the million dollar checks are being paid to petition signers to act as “spokesmen” for the petition.

The post Wisconsin AG Sues to Stop Elon Musk’s Million Dollar Voter Check Handouts appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Utah Becomes First State to Ban Pride Flags on Government Property, Including Schools

“Pride flag” by quinn.anya is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

On Friday, Utah became the first state in the nation to enact a law prohibiting the display of LGBTQ Pride flags and other unsanctioned flags on government property, including public schools.

The legislation, HB77, or the “Flag Display Amendments,” was passed by the Utah Legislature earlier this month and became law without Governor Spencer Cox’s signature because he declined to sign or veto it.

Effective May 7, 2025, the law restricts flag displays to a specific list, including the U.S. flag, the Utah state flag, military flags, and a few other approved categories.

There will be a $500 daily fine for any flag violations.

The legislation was introduced by Representative Trevor Lee and co-sponsored by Senator Dan McCay, both Republicans.

Originally, the bill only targeted public schools but was expanded to include all government buildings and property.

HB77 passed the Utah House in February with a vote of 49-20, as some Republicans joined Democrats in opposition. The Senate approved it in March with a 21-8 vote, again seeing bipartisan dissent from Senators Daniel Thatcher and Todd Weiler, who voted with Democrats.

“We want to make sure that if there is something that’s considered political and makes someone feel uncomfortable, that they shouldn’t have to worry about the government pushing and enforcing or pushing any type of ideology on anyone,” Lee said during a Senate Education Committee hearing in February.

The post Utah Becomes First State to Ban Pride Flags on Government Property, Including Schools appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Gabbard Revokes Security Clearances From Biden, Harris, Clinton, Cheney

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced Friday night that she has revoked the security clearance of former President Joe Biden. Other anti-Trump figures, ranging from the former Vice President Kamala Harris to the former Rep. Liz Cheney, also had their security clearances revoked. 

Per @POTUS directive, I have revoked former President Joe Biden’s security clearance, and revoked clearances and access to classified information for Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Fiona Hill, and Alexander Vindman.

— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) March 28, 2025

The decision to revoke the clearances followed a White House memo from last week requesting the revocations. Gabbard’s announcement omitted some of the persons named, such as the former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and the former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.

The post Gabbard Revokes Security Clearances From Biden, Harris, Clinton, Cheney appeared first on The American Conservative.

Feds Investigating Maine DOE Over Allegations That Schools Are Hiding Gender Transitions from Parents

The U.S. Department of Education has launched an investigation into the Maine Department of Education over allegations that schools in the state may have violated federal law by hiding student gender transitions from parents.

The probe, announced on Friday, will look for breaches of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

The U.S. D.O.E. said in a press release:

This investigation comes amid reports that dozens of Maine school districts are violating or misusing FERPA by maintaining policies that infringe on parents’ rights. The districts’ policies allegedly allow for schools to create “gender plans” supporting a student’s “transgender identity” and then claim those plans are not education records under FERPA and therefore not available to parents.

This action, alongside SPPO’s investigation initiated yesterday into the California Department of Education, is in furtherance of U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon’s directives to strengthen FERPA enforcement by taking action against schools misusing FERPA and clearing the backlog of complaints submitted to SPPO that accumulated under the Biden Administration.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Education said in a statement, “We take seriously any allegations that schools or state agencies may be denying parents their lawful rights to access their children’s education records. This investigation will determine if Maine’s policies and practices align with federal law.”

“Parents and guardians have the right to access their child’s education records to guide and safeguard their child’s mental, emotional, and physical well-being. Any policy to the contrary is both illegal and immoral,” said Secretary of Education Linda McMahon. “A few weeks ago, I had the opportunity to meet with several young people who shared their detransitioning stories. It is deeply concerning to hear that teachers and school counselors in Maine are reportedly encouraging and helping students to undergo so-called ‘gender transitions’ while keeping parents in the dark. The Trump Administration will enforce all federal laws to safeguard students and families.”

Parents Defending Education Founder and President Nicole Neily said of the investigation, “Under the previous Administration, we were fighting to protect our children from irreversible ‘sex changes’ – a path too often facilitated by school personnel who we entrusted with our children. We are proud to stand with President Trump and Secretary McMahon to hold school districts accountable and ensure no child is socially transitioned behind parent’s backs by teachers or administrators,”

Maine’s Department of Education has not yet issued a statement addressing the matter.

Last month, the Department of Education launched an investigation into Maine’s compliance with Title IX laws after Democrat Maine Governor Janet Mills clashed with President Donald Trump at a National Governors Association (NGA) meeting over biological males competing against females. During the meeting, she claimed that she would see Trump in court to fight him over the issue.

“Today the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) sent a letter to the Maine Department of Education Commissioner Pender Makin announcing that OCR is initiating a directed investigation of the Maine Department of Education (MDOE) amid allegations that it continues to allow male athletes to compete in girls’ interscholastic athletics and that it has denied female athletes female-only intimate facilities, thereby violating federal antidiscrimination law,” the DOE said in a press release.

“The letter also notifies MDOE that OCR is launching an investigation into Maine School Administrative District #51 (MSAD #51), after it was reported that Greely High School, a school under its jurisdiction, is continuing to allow at least one male student to compete in girls’ categories.”

Acting assistant secretary for civil rights Craig Trainor added:

“Maine would have you believe that it has no choice in how it treats women and girls in athletics – that is, that it must follow its state laws and allow male athletes to compete against women and girls. Let me be clear: If Maine wants to continue to receive federal funds from the Education Department, it has to follow Title IX. If it wants to forgo federal funds and continue to trample the rights of its young female athletes, that, too, is its choice. OCR will do everything in its power to ensure taxpayers are not funding blatant civil rights violators.”

The Department of Education found Maine’s Department of Education to be in violation of Title IX on March 19.

The post Feds Investigating Maine DOE Over Allegations That Schools Are Hiding Gender Transitions from Parents appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Love Him or Hate Him, Trump Has Kept His Campaign Promises

Photo Courtesy of Trump White House Archived

 

The media and the Democrats are going nuts, calling Trump a coward, a dictator, and a liar. But the man has spent the last eight years fighting the entire Democratic establishment, the mainstream media, and Hollywood—and he’s still standing. So, the idea that he’s a coward seems completely unfounded.

As for the “dictator” label, Trump’s actions are completely consistent with the promises he made to voters. Which brings us to the false claim that he’s a liar. In the history of politics, there may be no better example of someone winning an election and then working night and day—against a hostile press and entrenched political opposition—to fulfill the promises he made on the campaign trail.

People who don’t like DOGE, or the elimination of the Department of Education, or any number of Trump’s other policies keep asking: “Is this what you voted for?” And Trump voters answer truthfully: “Yes. This is exactly what I voted for.” He promised, and he delivered.

Here’s a list of campaign promises Donald Trump has fulfilled in just the first three months of his second term (2025):

In his second term, President Trump has moved quickly to fulfill a wide range of campaign promises. One of the most notable actions was the creation of the Department of Government Oversight and Efficiency (DOGE), a new federal agency established to streamline bureaucracy, eliminate redundant programs, and root out corruption in Washington. Alongside that, he abolished the Department of Education, returning control of school funding and curriculum oversight to the states—a long-standing conservative goal.

Trump also reintroduced Schedule F, a directive allowing the easier removal of federal employees considered disloyal or obstructive, as part of his broader effort to dismantle what he calls the “deep state.” This restructuring of the federal workforce ties into his broader agenda of restoring accountability in Washington.

On immigration and border security, the administration has ordered mass deportations, revived Title 42-style expulsions, and expanded border wall construction. The National Guard and active-duty troops have been deployed to assist with enforcement. In addition, Trump signed an executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented immigrants, though the policy is still under legal review.

Trade and economic nationalism have also returned to the forefront. Trump reimposed tariffs on China and Mexico, strengthened Buy American rules for federal purchases, and suspended U.S. contributions to global climate and development funds. He has emphasized energy independence by authorizing new drilling projects on federal land, reviving the Keystone XL pipeline, and rolling back Biden-era environmental regulations. The U.S. has once again withdrawn from international climate agreements.

In cultural and social policy, Trump has issued executive orders banning federal DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) programs and defunding gender transition procedures in federally funded healthcare. He also blocked funding for schools that promote critical race theory or radical gender ideology, while reinforcing protections for religious liberty in federal institutions.

The administration has taken aggressive steps to defend free speech, targeting what it describes as government collusion with social media companies and mandating that colleges uphold free speech protections as a condition of federal funding.

Law enforcement and public safety have been another priority. Trump has expanded federal funding for police departments, increased penalties for assaulting officers, and authorized “Law and Order Zones” to enhance public safety in high-crime areas. He also issued mass pardons for individuals prosecuted in connection with the January 6 Capitol events.

On foreign policy, Trump has reassessed U.S. aid to Ukraine, sanctioned Iran, and reversed all remaining concessions tied to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action — commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). He has also taken symbolic steps toward renewing talks to purchase Greenland, citing national security concerns.

In the health sector, Trump eliminated vaccine mandates within federal agencies and dissolved pandemic-era surveillance offices. He also moved to streamline access to VA healthcare and has expanded the military’s focus on space and hypersonic weapons development.

In response to President Trump’s policy agenda in his second term—particularly the formation of DOGE (Department of Government Oversight and Efficiency) and the abolishment of the Department of Education—there has been a significant surge in political resistance, including calls for civil disobedience.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) has been among the most vocal critics, openly calling for “mass peaceful resistance” and hinting at the need for civil disobedience in defiance of what she describes as “authoritarian overreach.” While AOC stopped short of directly calling for violence, her remarks were interpreted by some as a green light for aggressive public demonstrations. Other progressive lawmakers and activists have echoed similar sentiments, framing Trump’s policies as illegitimate and dangerous to democracy.

At the same time, prominent media figures and celebrities have added fuel to the fire, with several using their platforms to support disruptive protests. Some fringe commentators have even advocated for direct action and unrest, and there have been isolated outbreaks of vandalism and riots in major cities—especially where DOGE offices were opened.

A noticeable amount of this anger has also been directed at Elon Musk, due to his high-profile support for DOGE and his broader alignment with Trump’s deregulation and free speech initiatives. Musk’s companies have been the target of protest and online boycott campaigns, and some physical DOGE facilities reportedly funded through Musk’s ventures have faced threats and demonstrations. Tesla dealerships have been subjected to occupation, vandalism, and fires.

The democrats/liberals call the opposition to Trump a defense of democracy, while Republicans view it as a breakdown of law and order in response to a duly elected president carrying out his agenda. The Biden-aligned opposition sees DOGE as a tool for authoritarian control; Trump’s supporters view it as long-overdue government reform.

Whether you agree with his policies or not, Trump is neither a coward nor a liar. He is doing exactly what he said he would. His electoral base demanded bold change—and he’s delivering. That’s not dictatorship. That’s keeping promises.

The post Love Him or Hate Him, Trump Has Kept His Campaign Promises appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

FCC Chair Launches Investigation into Disney Over Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices

Disneyland is having an “After Dark: Pride Nite” event in June at Disneyland in Anaheim, California. (@Disney / Twitter)

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced the launch of an investigation into The Walt Disney Company and its ABC subsidiary, focusing on the company’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) practices.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said the probe aims to determine whether Disney’s DEI initiatives comply with FCC equal employment opportunity regulations.

Chairman Carr’s investigation centers on concerns that Disney’s DEI efforts may constitute what he referred to as “invidious forms of discrimination.”

In a letter to Disney CEO Bob Iger, posted publicly on X, Carr wrote, “I want to ensure that Disney and ABC have not been violating FCC equal employment opportunity regulations by promoting invidious forms of DEI discrimination.”

I have asked the @FCC’s Enforcement Bureau to open an investigation into Disney & ABC.

While Disney started as an iconic American company, it recently went all in on DEI.

I am concerned that their DEI practices may violate FCC prohibitions on invidious forms of discrimination. pic.twitter.com/E31QwwFcxA

— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) March 28, 2025

“Although your company recently made some changes to how it brands certain efforts, it is not clear that the underlying policies have changed in a fundamental manner — nor that past practices complied with relevant FCC regulations,” Carr continued.

Carr’s letter further noted, “In order to aid the FCC’s investigation into these matters, the Commission’s Enforcement Bureau will be engaging with your company to obtain an accounting of Disney and ABC’s DEI programs, policies, and practices.”

The investigation follows Disney’s recent scaling back of certain DEI initiatives, including the termination of its “Reimagine Tomorrow” program, which aimed to “amplify underrepresented voices.”

Despite some changes, Carr pointed to an alleged creation of “racially-segregated affinity groups and spaces” and ABC’s “inclusion standards” which mandate that 50 percent of regular characters must be from “underrepresented groups.”

In February, Carr initiated similar investigations into Comcast, the parent of NBCUniversal, and Verizon.

Disney issued a brief statement in response to the FCC letter, which read as follows: “We are reviewing the Federal Communications Commission’s letter, and we look forward to engaging with the commission to answer its questions.”

The post FCC Chair Launches Investigation into Disney Over Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Practices appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Signal Chat Scandal—A Tempest in a Teacup, Not an Actionable Offense

Secretary of Defense Hegseth — Photo courtesy of NBC News, screenshot from YouTube

 

On March 28, 2025, a firestorm erupted in the United States over a leaked Signal chat involving high-ranking defense and intelligence officials, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and an unexpected interloper: a journalist from The Atlantic. The chat allegedly contained operational details about Yemen strikes—timing, targets, even specific weapons like F-18s and drones. Outrage ensued.

Democratic pundits and politicians have called for Hegseth’s resignation, condemning the incident as a national security breach. Yet, as the dust settles, a closer examination suggests this may be less a crime than a colossal embarrassment—one that raises questions of carelessness rather than criminality.

Let’s start with the basics. Was it illegal for these officials to use Signal, an encrypted messaging app, for official communications? The short answer is no—not inherently. Signal isn’t a government-approved platform like SIPRNet for classified exchanges, and Pentagon rules generally bar commercial apps from handling “non-public DoD information” without authorization. Yet, officials across administrations have used it for unclassified coordination, often with tacit approval. The legality hinges not on the app but on what was shared. If the chat was just logistical chatter, it might be a procedural misstep, not a crime. If it included classified battle plans, that’s dicier—but more on that later. For now, the mere existence of a Signal group isn’t the smoking gun critics claim.

Next, the million-dollar question: Was the leaked information top secret, secret, or even classified at all? We don’t know—and that’s the crux of the issue. *The Atlantic* reported specifics—“1415: Strike Drones on Target”—that experts say scream “Secret” or “Top Secret,” given their operational sensitivity. Former Pentagon officials have called it a textbook security breach, arguing that such details could tip off adversaries like the Houthis, endangering troops and missions. Yet the Trump administration insists nothing classified was shared, and Hegseth, as the original classifying authority, could theoretically declassify it on the fly (though there’s no sign he did).

Classification matters, but it’s not the whole story—under the Espionage Act, even unclassified “national defense information” (NDI) can be protected if its disclosure harms the U.S. or benefits a foreign adversary. However, that determination is subjective. In this case, the information was released after the fact, making it difficult to prove any actual harm.

So, is it criminal to expose such information to an unauthorized person—like a journalist accidentally added to the chat? Not necessarily. The Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. § 793) requires intent—willfully sharing NDI with “reason to believe” it could hurt the nation. Penalties are steep—up to 10 years in prison—but accidental leaks rarely meet this bar. Think Jack Teixeira or Chelsea Manning, who deliberately dumped secrets. Here, reports suggest Rep. Michael Waltz added the wrong number, a blunder, not a plot. If true, intent’s absent, and criminal charges crumble. Even if the info was classified, unintentional exposure might violate DoD policy—think reprimands or firings—but it’s not automatically a crime.

For sensitive-but-unclassified data, the risk is even lower: a slap on the wrist, not handcuffs. Gross negligence could theoretically trigger legal heat, but prosecutions for that are vanishingly rare.

This brings us to the heart of the uproar: if it wasn’t intentional, can anyone be charged with revealing state secrets? Probably not. The law’s high bar for intent shields the chat’s participants from espionage rap sheets. No evidence suggests they meant to spill beans to *The Atlantic*. At worst, it’s carelessness—sloppy tradecraft in an era of heightened scrutiny. Critics might argue that negligence this egregious borders on reckless endangerment, especially if it named an undercover CIA officer (as reported).

But without intent, it’s a stretch to call it a crime. Investigations—by Congress, the DoD Inspector General, or the FBI—might probe damage and accountability, but don’t expect indictments.

The Federal Records Act adds fuel to the fire: Signal’s auto-delete feature could skirt transparency laws, heightening perceptions of incompetence or even a cover-up. Yet carelessness isn’t a crime, and there’s no evidence of any deliberate concealment. So why the calls for resignation? Critics cite public trust, but the real drivers are politics and optics. Democrats, who opposed Hegseth’s confirmation from the start, are seizing on any reason to oust him. The irony? If he’s fired, he’d simply be replaced by another Trump appointee they’d equally despise.

In truth, the entire ‘Signal-gate’ uproar is an exercise in distraction and frustrated outrage. What’s really fueling their anger isn’t just this incident—it’s their broader disdain for Trump and Musk. With three years and nine months left in this administration, and no way to change that, they’re left to nitpick, bicker, and vent their fury, hoping to build a platform for the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

Let’s not overreact. No troops died. No operation failed (that we know). The journalist didn’t publish until after the strikes, limiting immediate harm. Compare this to Edward Snowden’s mass leaks or Reality Winner’s espionage conviction—this is a fumble, not treason. Hegseth’s defenders argue it’s a partisan pile-on, with Democrats exploiting a mistake to kneecap a Trump loyalist. The furor feels outsized for an unproven breach.

Here’s my take: the legal case is weak. No intent, no clear crime, just a mess of unknowns.

The post The Signal Chat Scandal—A Tempest in a Teacup, Not an Actionable Offense appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.