Bill Clinton’s Hands Shake Uncontrollably While Delivering Speech In Oklahoma City (VIDEO)

Screenshot of Bill Clinton via CSPAN X Account

Former President Bill Clinton took a trip to Oklahoma City on Saturday morning to attend a ceremony remembering the lives lost at the deadly Oklahoma City bombing.

While speaking at the ceremony, Clinton shared, “I still remember as if it were 30 minutes ago, coming here with Hillary to that memorial service and saying: ‘You have lost too much, but you have not lost everything. You have certainly not lost America, and we will be with you for as many tomorrows as it takes.”

He added, “I do think we’ve kept that commitment.”

The deadly Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, after a truck bomb exploded at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, which claimed the lives of 168 people, including 19 children.

While delivering his speech at the ceremony, Clinton’s hands appear to shake uncontrollably.

Clinton previously addressed the hand tremors and said he does not have Parkinson’s.

“If I had Parkinson’s, I wanted to know so I could prepare. And I had it tested and the doctor said ‘no.’ He says it’s just a normal aging phenomenon,” Clinton previously said.

WATCH:

Former President @BillClinton at Oklahoma City Bombing 30th Anniversary Remembrance Ceremony: “If our lives are going to be dominated by the effort to dominate people we disagree with we’re going to put the 250 year old march toward a more perfect union at risk.” pic.twitter.com/71TYyKGGrZ

— CSPAN (@cspan) April 19, 2025

Per CBS:

Thirty years after the deadliest homegrown attack in U.S. history, former President Bill Clinton returned to Oklahoma City on Saturday to remember the people who were killed and comfort those affected by the bombing.

Clinton was president on April 19, 1995, when a truck bomb exploded, destroying a nine-story federal building in downtown Oklahoma City. He delivered the keynote address at a remembrance ceremony near the Oklahoma City National Memorial Museum.

Clinton, now 78, was widely praised for how he helped the city grapple with its grief in the wake of the bombing, which killed 168 people, including 19 children. He says it was a day in his presidency that he will never forget.

“I still remember as if it were 30 minutes ago, coming here with Hillary to that memorial service and saying: ‘You have lost too much, but you have not lost everything. You have certainly not lost America, and we will be with you for as many tomorrows as it takes,’” Clinton said, recalling his first visit to Oklahoma City just days after the bombing, when he spoke at a memorial service for the for the victims. “I do think we’ve kept that commitment.”

In the last two decades, the 78-year-old Clinton has faced several health scares.

In 2021, he was hospitalized for a sepsis infection, and in 2004, he underwent a quadruple bypass operation on his heart.

READ:

Bill Clinton Hangs Onto Hillary as He Leaves SoCal Hospital After Several Days of Treatment for Sepsis Infection (VIDEO)

The post Bill Clinton’s Hands Shake Uncontrollably While Delivering Speech In Oklahoma City (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

War Room’s Steve Bannon Discusses with Raheem Kassam the Democrat Party and Their Favoring of Terrorists Over the United States and the Constitution (VIDEO)

Steve Bannon talks with Raheem Kassam of The National Pulse on 4/19/25

War Room’s Steve Bannon talked with senior editor of the The National Pulse Raheem Kassam on Saturday about the Democrat party and their favoring of terrorists over the safety of the United States and the Constitution.

“It’s so amazing how many of the issues that were driving the fight for independence back then are still today fighting, you know, in this fight for independence,” Bannon said.

“Just like back in the Revolution, there are, these are unbridgeable gaps,” Bannon continued.

“They want this country’s sovereignty sucked away, and there is no, you can’t, it’s not a debate, right? They are not gonna listen to you and so we are down to a political fight, and one side is gonna win and one side is gonna lose,” Bannon continued.

“I know there are lots of you out there who kind of think that you know, surely we will at some point come to an accommodation, surely at some point there will be a compromise, surely at some point in the nation we will come together,” Kassam said.

“I hate to break it to you, but right now, in this very moment, you have I would say, the predominant majority of the Democrat party, its institutions, its think tanks, its elected representative and its base all over the country that are more in favor of foreign terrorists, groups and people whether it be gangbangers or Hamas, than they are in favor of the United States, its Constitution, its manufacturing base, its own people,” Kassam said.

“It is a fight, it is a fight to the finish and the finish line looks like what the country ends up being like,” Kassam said.

Kassam explained that the Supreme Court’s decision to block President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a hurdle and that we should not give up hope.

“This Supreme Court decision this morning, it’s a hurdle, and nobody should be slumped in their chairs and thinking, oh my gosh, we lost this fight,” Kassam said.

Kassam also explained that the Colonists commitment to freedom changed the course of history with the American Revolution.

“For the British Parliament, all the way through to the Colonists living next door to these people, people like Jefferson were saying, what the heck are you talking about? And over time and with patience and with you know with eloquence and stick-to-itiveness, they actually ended up forming majority of people who ended up changing history forever,” Kassam continued.

Watch:

The post War Room’s Steve Bannon Discusses with Raheem Kassam the Democrat Party and Their Favoring of Terrorists Over the United States and the Constitution (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

UK on Edge After Mystery Drones Spotted Over King Charles Residence – No-Fly Zone in Place Over Sandringham After Incident During Visit by Ukraine’s Zelensky

Drones over Sandringham: a real threat or just another ‘Russian peril’ narrative?

The United Kingdom is worried about its King’s security after unidentified drones were seen over Charles Royal residence of Sandringham.

A no-fly zone has been put in place over the King’s home after the scare occurred during the Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to the estate.

Sky News reported:

“The restrictions were requested by security services on 4 March – days after Charles hosted Volodymyr Zelenskyy – and came into force on 10 March.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander signed off on the order that restricts aircraft from flying below 2,000 feet at Sandringham ‘for reasons of public safety and security’.”

‘Spooks fear threat’: intelligence services are worried.

“The order states: ‘These regulations impose restrictions on flying in the vicinity of Sandringham House, Norfolk. In view of the need for security for members of the Royal Family and other dignitaries staying at or visiting Sandringham House and at the request of the security services, it has been agreed by the Civil Aviation Authority and the Department for Transport that flying should be restricted in the vicinity of that location for reasons of public safety and security’.”

The King hosted Zelensky back in March while he was in the UK for a defense summit held in London.

“Drones on the estate sparked a major security operation, with one traced to a man sitting in a car nearby and the source of others believed to be unknown, The Sun reported.”

Read more:

‘Special Relationship’: Trump To Visit the United Kingdom in September, Stay at Windsor Castle and Spend Time With the Royal Family

The post UK on Edge After Mystery Drones Spotted Over King Charles Residence – No-Fly Zone in Place Over Sandringham After Incident During Visit by Ukraine’s Zelensky appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Test Scores Plummet for Low-Income Students as Woke Agenda Ruins U.S. Schools – “Five Alarm Fire”

NAEP test scores for America’s most vulnerable students have collapsed — and the timeline tells the story mainstream media won’t: the “Great Awokening” is failing the very kids it claimed it was trying to help.

A recent New York Times article accidentally admits what conservative education reformers and frustrated parents have long warned: academic standards in America are collapsing — and it’s the poor, working-class, and disadvantaged kids who are being hurt the most.

In a piece titled “The Pandemic Is Not the Only Reason U.S. Students Are Losing Ground”, the Times finally acknowledges that the nation’s lowest-performing students began falling behind years before COVID — right around 2013. That timeline is key, because it coincides not only with the decline of the Bush-era No Child Left Behind legislation but also the rise of radical progressive dogma in public education — a cultural shift critics have called the “Great Awokening.”

NAEP, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, data show that from 2003 to 2013, even the bottom 10% of test takers — the kids most in need of educational support — were slowly gaining ground. But starting around 2013, that trend reversed. Since then, the lowest scorers on math and reading tests in both 4th and 8th grade have steadily declined, with the drop accelerating after 2020.

“Today, the country’s lowest-scoring students are in free fall,” the Times concedes.

The American Enterprise Institute says this data represents a “five alarm fire” about America’s educational progress.

Leftists are dismissing the data as reflecting nothing more than racial differences and cheating on the NAEP tests and aren’t worth worrying about.

This isn’t about kids in the top percentile doing marginally worse. It’s the bottom quartile — disproportionately made up of students with disabilities, English-language learners, and children from low-income families — who are bearing the brunt of the educational collapse. According to the data, even as higher-achieving students began to stabilize post-pandemic, these students continued to lose ground.

The top-scorers are treading water during the woke era’s schooling, but the bottom-scorers are watching their scores fall off a cliff.

“Equity” in Practice: Woke Policy, Declining Academic Performance

While the New York Times scrambles to blame factors like the Great Recession, smartphone use, and the expiration of Bush-era school accountability laws, it refuses to confront the elephant in the classroom: the sweeping transformation of public education into a laboratory for progressive social experiments.

Since 2013, public schools have been rapidly reengineered to prioritize equity over excellence, activism over academics, and “lived experience” over logic and literacy. Standardized testing, discipline, gifted programs, and even math instruction have been attacked as “racist.” Phonics and factual history have been replaced by feelings, narratives, and DEI training sessions.

As author and writer Steve Sailer noted in his Substack commentary on the same NAEP trends, the decline isn’t random: “White collar kids do okay going to school on Zoom, but blue collar kids benefit from going to school in person and being talked at by middle class grown-ups.”

That’s two years after 2013 — just when schools began fully embracing identity politics, anti-merit ideology, and cultural radicalism under the guise of “inclusive education.”

The shift from teaching core subjects to indoctrinating students with gender theory, racial resentment, and anti-American narratives didn’t just waste classroom time — it has eroded the structure and authority that vulnerable students rely on to succeed.

Collapse by Design?

Under No Child Left Behind, schools had to show results. Teachers were pressured to produce gains in reading and math, and test scores were scrutinized by parents and administrators alike. That model may have been stressful and controversial — but according to the standardized scores it worked, particularly for kids who lacked academic resources and other support structures at home.

When that system collapsed — first under Obama-era waivers and later through bipartisan neglect — schools were cut loose from accountability just as the “equity” movement took over. The new focus? Group identity, social justice, “anti-racism,” and vague “trauma-informed” teaching. And what followed?

A measurable, decade-long collapse in performance — felt most acutely by the very children the Left claims to champion.

The bottom 10% didn’t just lose ground. They were left behind by design, as public education stopped being about equal opportunity and started being about ideological conformity.

The current collapse in academic performance among low-income students also eerily echoes the Cloward-Piven strategy, a radical political theory developed in the 1960s by sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Their idea was to overwhelm and destabilize public systems — like welfare — by deliberately increasing dependency and pushing those systems to a breaking point, thereby creating a crisis that could be used to justify sweeping federal intervention and structural transformation. In today’s education system, a similar pattern has emerged: discipline is dismantled, academic standards are eroded, and merit is decried as oppressive — all under the guise of “equity.” As a result, schools fail the very students they’re meant to uplift, fueling a larger political agenda of centralization, dependency, and permanent grievance. Whether intentional or not, the net effect resembles Cloward and Piven’s original vision: a failed system that paves the way for radical change under crisis conditions.

Mainstream Media Catches On — But Still Misses the Point – And Protect the Left-Wing Agenda at Work

The Times article, to its credit, documents the trend. But like so many left-wing corporate media outlets, refuses to say the quiet part out loud. Instead, it tiptoes around the decline and tosses out generic explanations:

“Researchers point to a number of educational and societal changes over the past decade, including a retrenchment in school accountability, the lasting effects of the Great Recession and the rise of smartphones…”

But none of those factors explain the intensity of the drop after 2013. Nor do they account for why scores among high-achieving students have remained relatively steady while only the bottom performers plummeted.

What does explain it? A loss of structure. A loss of rigor. A classroom environment now hostile to objective standards, discipline, and academic excellence.

The Great Awokening’s Real Legacy: Failing the Poor & Needy

The real tragedy here isn’t just statistical. It’s generational. A full decade of failed educational ideology — imposed top-down by activists, bureaucrats, and DEI consultants — has robbed an entire cohort of students of their chance to succeed.

And while elites send their kids to prep schools and STEM camps, low-income children are being experimented on with race essentialism, TikTok therapy sessions, and Critical Theory disguised as compassion.

The “Great Awokening” was never about helping the poor. It was about seizing cultural power — and now, the consequences are being measured in test scores, dropout rates, and shattered futures.

These reports are further proof that President Trump’s efforts last month to dismantle the Department of Education were long overdue.

The post Test Scores Plummet for Low-Income Students as Woke Agenda Ruins U.S. Schools – “Five Alarm Fire” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NYPD Chief Files Lawsuit Against NYC Councilwoman Who BIT HIM During Protest (VIDEO)

An NYPD chief has filed a lawsuit against the New York City councilwoman who bit him during a protest in July, one day after criminal charges against her were dropped.

Frank DiGiacomo, deputy chief of Patrol Brooklyn South, filed a lawsuit against Councilwoman Susan Zhuang in the Brooklyn Supreme Court earlier this month.

The incident occurred at a protest called “Residents Against Homeless Shelters” in Gravesend. The participants were protesting the noise from the construction of a large shelter planned to house 150 homeless men.

Zhuang had allegedly bitten DiGiacomo to prevent him from arresting another woman who was pushing the police barricades at the officers.

The assault was also captured on camera.

BREAKING: NYC Councilwoman Susan Zhuang (D) caught on video BITING an NYPD officer pic.twitter.com/hy05ZVC67g

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) July 18, 2024

The bite broke the skin and left cuts and tooth marks on DiGiacomo’s arm. The officer had to be treated with an “anti-viral cocktail” and a tetanus shot.

The New York Post reports:

Before the criminal case was dropped, Zhuang, 39, and DiGiacomo met as part of a “restorative justice” program, according to the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office.

The face-to-face and ultimate dismissal of the criminal charges was “based on the wishes of the victim and the defendant’s willingness to make amends,” Brooklyn DA spokesman Oren Yaniv said in a statement at the time.

“This case was resolved through a restorative justice process that created space for dialogue, accountability, and healing,” touted the statement.

But despite the apparent kumbaya moment, DiGiacomo is proceeding with the lawsuit accusing Zhuang of negligence and of leaving him “permanently injured” and suffering from great “trauma and distress,” court records show.

The post NYPD Chief Files Lawsuit Against NYC Councilwoman Who BIT HIM During Protest (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

INFURIATING: Trump Admin Releases Photos of Suspected Venezuelan Tren de Aragua Gang Members with Serious Criminal Records After SCOTUS Blocks Deportation

The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s effort to deport dozens of Venezuelan illegal aliens—many of them accused violent criminals—under the historic Alien Enemies Act of 1798 (AEA).

The ruling came after a late-night emergency appeal filed by the far-left American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

The far-left ACLU’s case is currently under review by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. After receiving a tip that illegal aliens were being loaded onto buses for removal, the ACLU rushed to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking an emergency injunction to block the deportations.

While waiting for the Fifth Circuit to act, the Court issued an unsigned order siding with the ACLU’s appeal, temporarily halting the removal of dozens of Venezuelans detained at the Bluebonnet Detention Center in Texas.

According to ACLU, “Plaintiffs learned that the government has begun giving notices of removal to class members, in English only, which do not say how much time individuals have to contest their removal or even how to do so… And officers last night told class members that they will be removed within 24 hours, which expires as early as this afternoon. Upon information and belief, individuals have already been loaded on to buses.”

The court neither granted nor denied the application filed by the detainees’ attorneys but effectively put the case on hold, impacting individuals currently detained in the Northern District of Texas.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito strongly dissented from the majority ruling.

According to the order:

“There is before the Court an application on behalf of a putative class of detainees seeking an injunction against their removal under the Alien Enemies Act. The matter is currently pending before the Fifth Circuit. Upon action by the Fifth Circuit, the Solicitor General is invited to file a response to the application before this Court as soon as possible.

The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court. See 28 U. S. C. §1651(a). Justice Thomas and Justice Alito dissent from the Court’s order. Statement from Justice Alito to follow.”

In a blistering response, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, exposed the ACLU’s legal maneuvering as dangerous and unserious:

Early this morning, this Court entered an order inviting the Solicitor General to file a response to the application as soon as possible upon action by the Fifth Circuit. 4/19/25 Order. The Court further directed the government “not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court.”

The Fifth Circuit has denied applicants’ motion as premature in a per curiam opinion. The court explained that if respondents were concerned that the government’s position on not removing applicants had changed, “they should have litigated these concerns before the district court in the first instance.”

Instead, applicants “gave the [district] court only 42 minutes to act—and did not give [the government] an opportunity to respond” before proceeding to the court of appeals. The court thus dismissed applicants’ appeal for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction, “for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Ramirez’s concurrence.”

Key Points from Sauer’s Argument:

Premature and Improper: Sauer emphasized that the Supreme Court should not be the first to review a case that has not even been properly evaluated by the lower courts. He called the ACLU’s actions “fatally premature.”

No Threat of Irreparable Harm: The government had already agreed not to deport the named petitioners—identified Venezuelan nationals detained under the Alien Enemies Act—until their habeas corpus petitions were resolved.

Flawed Class Action: Sauer slammed the ACLU’s attempt to certify a class of detainees, arguing it was “manifestly improper.” He pointed out that the petitioners claimed not to be members of Tren de Aragua, making them unfit to represent others who are.

Due Process Fully Respected: Sauer defended the administration’s process, stating that detainees had been given adequate notice and time to file legal challenges and that the government paused deportations for those who filed habeas petitions.

Legal Authority Still Intact: Sauer made it clear that even if the Alien Enemies Act was blocked, the government retains full authority under Title 8 of the U.S. Code to deport individuals affiliated with foreign terrorist organizations.

Now, the Trump administration has released shocking images of several Venezuelan nationals tied to the notorious Tren de Aragua gang.

According to Fox News reporter Bill Melugin, citing a senior administration official, the men pictured were among those set for imminent removal from the U.S. before the Supreme Court intervened.

Their rap sheets include child abuse, felony assault on police officers, drug trafficking, and weapons charges—all swept under the rug by left-wing legal groups determined to obstruct lawful deportation efforts.

The Names They Don’t Want You to See

Henry Jose ROMERO-Gonzalez, a citizen of Venezuela and confirmed TdA gang member.

Multiple pending criminal charges for assault (3x), crimes against a person, and unlawful possession of a weapon.

Credit: Bill Melugin

Alessandro Benedikt PARADES-Worwa, a citizen Venezuela and confirmed TdA gang member.

Criminal charges for aggravated assault with a weapon, pointing and presenting firearms at a person.

Credit: Bill Melugin

Cristian Andres ANDRADE-Vargas, a citizen Venezuela and confirmed TdA gang member.

Criminal charges for larceny and dangerous drugs.

Credit: Bill Melugin

Norge Yunaifer ROSALES-Ceballos, a citizen Venezuela and confirmed TdA gang member.

Criminal conviction for flight to avoid prosecution
Charges for alien smuggling and resisting an officer.

Credit: Bill Melugin

Felix Josue RENDON-Garcia, a citizen Venezuela and confirmed TdA gang member.

Criminal charges for drug possession and dangerous drugs.

Credit: Bill Melugin

Darrin Moises DAZA-Segura, a citizen Venezuela and confirmed TdA gang member.

convictions for burglary and larceny.

Credit: Bill Melugin

The post INFURIATING: Trump Admin Releases Photos of Suspected Venezuelan Tren de Aragua Gang Members with Serious Criminal Records After SCOTUS Blocks Deportation appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NEW: Radical Clinton Judge Prohibits Trump OPM From Firing More Probationary Workers After Supreme Court Ruling

Judge William Alsup / Wikimedia Commons

On Friday evening, US District Judge William Alsup, a Clinton appointee, barred the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) from directing the termination of more probationary employees.

President Trump previously fired tens of thousands of probationary workers as he worked to downsize the federal government and cut waste.

Last month, Judge Alsup ordered the Trump Administration to rehire thousands of fired probationary employees in six federal agencies.

The six government agencies include: VA, DOD, Energy, Interior, Treasury, and Agriculture.

However, last Tuesday, the US Supreme Court temporarily blocked Judge Alsup’s order and sided with the Trump Administration.

On Friday evening, Judge Alsup called the “boiler template” used to fire the federal workers “a sham” and prohibited the OPM from directing the termination of more probationary employees.

Agencies, however, are allowed to fire workers individually based on performance.

JUST IN: Judge William Alsup reimposes injunction against Trump admin’s mass firing of probationary workers at some fed agencies. But he will allow agencies to assert they made individualized decisions to fire. Doc: https://t.co/DP3tKS9t1V

— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) April 18, 2025

In a separate case, a federal appeals court last Wednesday cleared the way for President Trump to fire thousands of probationary workers across 18 federal agencies.

Last month, a federal judge ordered the Trump Administration to rehire approximately 20,000 probationary workers across 18 different agencies.

US District Judge James Bredar, an Obama appointee, said the Trump Administration cannot conduct massive layoffs without warning the workers.

“When the federal government terminates large numbers of its employees, including those still on probation because they were recently hired or promoted, it must follow certain rules,” the judge wrote in a 56-page order. “Some of those rules are intended to help states manage the consequences of sudden, mass layoffs.”

Judge Bredar extended his block but only in DC and the 19 states that filed a lawsuit. The judge did not issue a nationwide injunction.

The Virginia-based Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, granted the Trump Administration a motion for a stay of the preliminary injunction pending appeal.

The three-judge panel included: Allison Rushing (Trump), Harvie Wilkinson (Reagan), and DeAndrea Benjamin (Biden).

“The Supreme Court has stayed a similar preliminary injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,” the judge wrote, citing last Tuesday’s decision from the Supreme Court in a separate case.

The post NEW: Radical Clinton Judge Prohibits Trump OPM From Firing More Probationary Workers After Supreme Court Ruling appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Chris Van Hollen’s El Salvador Visit May Violate the Logan Act — and Trigger Criminal Charges

Senator Chris Van Hollen’s sudden trip to El Salvador to try to free deportee Kilmar Abrego Garcia may have been illegal.

Van Hollen traveled to the Central American nation on Thursday to meet with Abrego Garcia and lobby for his return to the United Statesm despite the fact that he is not a citizen.

Legal experts and conservative commentators are increasingly arguing Maryland Democrat may have violated The Logan Act, which prohibits unauthorized diplomacy with foreign nations.

The 1799 statute, named after Pennsylvania Senator George Logan, bans communication with foreign officials “with intent to influence the[ir] measures … in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States.”

The Logan Act was previously weaponized by Democrats to harass President Trump’s former National Security advisor Michael Flynn.

While punishment involves a fine or imprisonement of up to three years, nobody has ever been convicted under the act, which is largely seen as symbolic.

The American Accountability Foundation sent a letter to Senate leadership on Thursday highlighting the Trump administration’s evidence that Kilmar Abrego Garcia has connections to the violent transnational gang MS-13, which is designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

“Mr. Abrego-Garcia is essentially an enemy combatant in the ongoing invasion of the United States by transnational gangs,” AAF President Thomas Jones wrote to the heads of the Senate Ethics Committee and Majority Leader John Thune, in a letter obtained by The New York Post.

“Despite the overwhelming evidence, Senator Van Hollen decided that he would use Senate funds to fly to El Salvador and advocate for an enemy of the United States,” the letter said.

I said my main goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar. Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return. pic.twitter.com/U9y2gZpxCb

— Senator Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) April 18, 2025

The AAF is also calling on Thune to direct the Secretary of the Senate to deny funding for Chris Van Hollen’s trip to El Salvador and is urging the Senate Ethics Committee to investigate Van Hollen for violations of The Logan Act.

“Van Hollen was in El Salvador meeting with leaders of the Salvadorian government to attempt to secure Mr. Garcia’s release,” Jones wrote in the letter.

“It is hard to imagine a more hostile intrusion into U.S. foreign policy than attempting to smuggle a foreign enemy combatant into the United States.”

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, 29, was living in Maryland before being deported to El Salvador last month, one of roughly 260 suspected gang members removed under President Trump’s invocation of the 18th-century Alien and Enemies Act.

Similar deportation efforts have since been blocked by Democratic judges and even the Supreme Court.

On Friday, House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer denied requests by House Democrats also to visit El Salvador to meet with Abrego Garcia.

If you also wish to meet with him, you can spend your own money,” he wrote in a letter to Democratic Reps. Robert Garcia of California and Maxwell Alejandro Frost of Florida.

”But I will not approve a single dime of taxpayer funds for use on the excursion you have requested.“

House Oversight Chair James Comer Denies Democrats Taxpayer Funds to Visit MS-13 Gang Member in El Salvador: ‘Spend Your Own Money’

The post Chris Van Hollen’s El Salvador Visit May Violate the Logan Act — and Trigger Criminal Charges appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

‘Part of the F-cking Problem’: Austin Metcalf’s Father Insists Race Played No Role in His Death, Condemns People Protesting on Son’s Behalf (VIDEOS)

Screenshot: Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) / X

Austin Metcalf’s father, Jeff Metcalf, has condemned people protesting on his son’s behalf — demanding that they are “part of the f-cking problem” and insisting that race played no role in his death.

There were two dueling rallies in Frisco, Texas, on Saturday: one supporting justice for Metcalf, and another demanding freedom for his killer, Karmelo Anthony.

Two opposing protests set for April 19 in Frisco, Texas.

Austin Metcalf’s supporters are calling for Karmelo Anthony to be returned to custody. Karmelo Anthony’s supporters are demanding charges be dropped, and Austin’s brother be charged because they’re not serious “people.” pic.twitter.com/65ngl48kE7

— Francesco (@frandalorian) April 19, 2025

Jeff Metcalf sent a representative to a “Protect White Americans” rally, being led by J6ers Philip Anderson, who is black, and Jake Lang, who is white.

The representative put Austin Metcalf’s father on speakerphone so that he could disavow the people demanding justice for his son. He demanded they stop using his son’s image to “fuel their cause.”

Watch the video by Tony Ortiz of Current Revolt:

Metcalf’s father on the phone with Jake Lang telling Lang he’s “part of the problem” and that Lang is creating more of a race divide. Mecalf’s father says he doesn’t condone anything Lang does. Lang accuses him of “white guilt.” pic.twitter.com/3MAvZkTwM7

— Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) (@CurrentRevolt) April 19, 2025

Lang and Anderson stood their ground and accused Metcalf of having “white guilt,” which the organizer said would lead to “thousands more Austin Metcalfs.”

“You are part of the f-cking problem, my friend, you are trying to cause more race divide than bridging the gap,” Jeff Metcalf said. “I do not condone anything you do.”

“That’s called white guilt,” Lang fired back.

“Black man here, you are being weak,” Anderson interjected.

Austin Metcalf’s dad is a pussy.

He didn’t hear a single word that was said at the protest but he condemned it because his black friend called him and told him to condemn it.

All we did was say that anti white racism, killing white people, and making a joke out of white people…

— Philip Anderson (@VoteHarrisOut) April 19, 2025

Black Violence Against White Americans will DECREASE in 2025-2026 because we have show! strength today!!

When others allowed FEAR & COWARDICE to dictate their inaction

We faced HEAD ON the Epidemic of Black Violence in America!

Amazing job @VoteHarrisOut

A true brother ‍ pic.twitter.com/ntgOOcjq3u

— Jake Lang – January 6 Political Prisoner (@JakeLangJ6) April 19, 2025

Bruce Carter of Team Black Males winning is here on behalf of Mecalf’s dad to tell Jake Lang to stop using his son’s name and this incident for events. pic.twitter.com/rUoc76XNaW

— Tony Ortiz (Current Revolt) (@CurrentRevolt) April 19, 2025

Anthony fatally stabbed 17-year-old Metcalf in the heart at a track meet in Frisco on April 2. He died in the arms of his twin brother.

According to reports, the confrontation began when Metcalf asked Anthony to move from under the Memorial High School team’s tent since he did not attend the school. The incident culminated in Anthony pulling a knife from his backpack and stabbing the honor roll student in the chest.

The Anthony family has since raised nearly $500,000 on GiveSendGo. They have purchased a new Cadillac and moved into a $900,000 home.

Fundraiser Brings in Over $160,000 for Teen Track Star Austin Metcalf’s KILLER

Jeff Metcalf was forcibly removed by police from a press conference held by the Anthony family earlier in the week. It is unclear why he was in attendance. He has been condemning anyone discussing race concerning his son’s case since the day after his murder.

Anthony has admitted to the stabbing and is charged with first-degree murder. He was released from custody last week after his bond was lowered to $250,000.

The post ‘Part of the F-cking Problem’: Austin Metcalf’s Father Insists Race Played No Role in His Death, Condemns People Protesting on Son’s Behalf (VIDEOS) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Kids Are Alright: New Poll Finds Gen Z Voters Under 21 Lean Republican by 11.7 Points

A new poll has found that Gen Z voters under 21 lean Republican by 11.7 points.

The poll’s findings are particularly shocking given that young voters have traditionally leaned to the left.

According to the new Yale Youth Poll, voters aged 22 to 29 lean Democrat by 6.4 points.

“When asked whether they would vote for the Democratic or Republican candidate in the 2026 congressional elections in their district, voters aged 22–29 favored the Democratic candidate by a margin of 6.4 points, but voters aged 18–21 favored the Republican by a margin of 11.7 points.”

Though the young voters plan to vote Republican, they do not necessarily agree with the GOP on all issues.

The pollsters report:

The survey included a range of questions on subjects from higher education to immigration to what the federal budget is spent on. The poll also implemented two A/B tests to gauge the effect of framing progressive policies as “human rights” and whether providing voters with basic information about government finances changes their views on the federal deficit, tax rates, and spending levels. The first message test found that arguing for progressive policies on homelessness on the grounds of “human rights” reduced support for the progressive position by 22 points.

The widest generational divides appeared on immigration and protest rights. While voters overall opposed allowing asylum seekers who enter the country illegally to stay by a 2-point margin, young voters supported allowing them to remain by a 25-point margin. On the question of whether international students should be deported for protesting the war in Gaza, voters overall opposed deportation by 36 points, while young voters opposed deportation by 65 points.

Voters under 30 were nearly split on whether teens aged 13 to 17 should be allowed access to gender transition treatments, opposing it by just a 0.1-point margin in comparison to the broader electorate, which opposed it by 24 points. They also differed on campus speech, with young voters supporting universities making political or social statements by a 6-point margin, while the broader electorate opposed such statements by a 13-point margin.

Young voters’ views on institutional trust and democratic reform followed a similar pattern. Young voters were more likely to say the Supreme Court rules based on ideology or partisanship rather than legal reasoning, whereas voters overall saw the Supreme Court as ruling based on the legal merits of cases.

These positions, which seem to swing left on some issues and right on others, suggest that young people are becoming increasingly unpredictable in their political alliances — possibly due to a lack of trust in the Democrat Party.

The Yale Youth Poll surveyed 4,100 registered voters from April 1 to April 3, with an oversample of 2,024 voters between 18 and 29. The margin of error was +/- 1.9 percentage points for the full sample and +/- 1.8 percentage points for the young voters.

The post The Kids Are Alright: New Poll Finds Gen Z Voters Under 21 Lean Republican by 11.7 Points appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.