President Trump is in more danger right now than at any other moment in his life.
As violent rhetoric from the left escalates and political hatred is normalized, the Secret Service is being pushed into an impossible position where every public appearance carries real risk. From packed rallies to high-profile stops like the recent Iowa appearance, the threat environment is intensifying fast.
The language coming from the left is no longer political criticism.
It is dehumanization.
Trump is still openly being called Hitler by Democrats and media figures, rhetoric that is quietly used to justify violence. Even more disturbing, an Ohio attorney general candidate recently went so far as to publicly call for Trump’s execution. This is not fringe internet talk.
This is the normalization of political violence from people seeking power.
Grant warns these are frightening times and raises serious questions about whether limiting public appearances may now be necessary for the President’s own safety. When political opponents begin talking like executioners instead of elected officials, the threat is no longer theoretical. It is real, and it is escalating. Secret Service, you have been warned, now please keep our Commander in Chief safe.
Germany’s globalist political establishment, which has imposed a catastrophic multiculturalism at any cost ideology upon its population, is once again confronting the human cost of its failed migration experiment, after a shocking and senseless killing at a Hamburg subway station exposed the consequences of policies long insulated from accountability.
Late Thursday evening, an 18-year-old German woman was brutally murdered at Hamburg’s Wandsbek-Markt station when a 25-year-old Sudanese migrant grabbed her and forced both of them onto the tracks in front of an oncoming train. Both died instantly, according to police, Remix News reports.
Investigators say the attacker and victim did not know one another and had been standing separately on the platform before the assault. The man reportedly approached without warning as the train entered the station, dragging the young woman into the path of the subway.
One eyewitness described the scene to Focus magazine, saying, “Unfortunately, I cannot judge that with the colored one. The woman was very young.” Police confirmed that witnesses were provided psychological counseling at the scene of the horrific murder as investigators reviewed security footage.
Horrific news coming out of Hamburg, Germany.
A woman was minding her own business waiting for a subway train last night when she was grabbed by a strange man, who threw them both under an arriving train.
Both died instantly. They did not know one another.
Authorities later identified the suspect as a South Sudanese national who arrived in Germany in mid-2024 through a federal humanitarian intake program. According to reports, he held a valid residence permit and was living in municipal accommodation at the time of the attack.
The murder briefly shut down Hamburg’s U1 subway line overnight and triggered a large emergency response involving police, fire crews, and Germany’s Red Cross crisis teams. Though for many Germans, the disruption felt grimly familiar—yet another teenage European girl murdered by a military aged migrant male from a culture alien to the West.
This killing is only the latest in a disturbing pattern of unprovoked violence at German train stations over the past several years. In August 2024, a 31-year-old Iraqi asylum seeker pushed a 16-year-old Ukrainian girl onto the tracks in Lower Saxony while she was speaking with her grandfather by phone.
That perpetrator, despite being legally required to leave Germany, avoided prison after prosecutors ruled him criminally irresponsible due to alleged schizophrenia. The girl died instantly.
In January 2023, a Syrian national threw a 16-year-old schoolgirl onto railway tracks in North Rhine-Westphalia, then jumped down himself before calmly boarding his train.
Even prominent critics of radical Islam have not been spared. In November 2025, Berlin educator Hudhaifa Al-Mashhadani survived an attempted push at a Neukölln subway station, later saying, “The man then hit me on the head… It was over in a few seconds.”
Earlier incidents include a 2023 case in Pforzheim, where an Algerian and a Tunisian migrant allegedly shoved a man onto the tracks for refusing to give them a cigarette. The victim was assaulted again while trying to climb back up.
These are not isolated tragedies, but symptoms of a political model that prioritizes ideological multiculturalism and replacism over public safety. Germany’s ruling class invited millions of unvetted, military-aged men from radically alien ultures into the country—and now insists that citizens accept the consequences in silence.
The contrast with the United States could not be clearer. As Germany’s leaders dismantled borders and outsourced security to wishful thinking, President Donald Trump chose enforcement, sovereignty, and national strength.
Under Trump, America rejected the globalist logic that hollowed out Western nations. His administration restored border control, unapologetically defended law enforcement, and rebuilt domestic industry—including American steel—as a foundation of national resilience.
Germany ignored that lesson. Its political elites dismantled both security and social cohesion, trusting programs to manage risks that can no longer be managed.
The Hamburg murder is now being investigated as a homicide, but the deeper responsibility lies far beyond one individual. It rests with a political establishment that knowingly created the conditions for such violence.
Ordinary Germans are paying the price—in train stations, public squares, and everyday life—while those who designed the system remain protected from its outcomes.
Carney is in constant collision course with his bigger neighbor Trump.
The western hemisphere continues to reel over Donald J. Trump’s territorial ambitions.
Yesterday, reports arose saying Trump’s officials had secretly contacted a separatist group in the key oil-producing Canadian region of Alberta.
There is a strong movement in the province for secession from the country due to the woke energy policies and the redistribution of oil revenues in favor of other regions.
As we would expect, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was greatly incensed by that.
Carney and the Alberta provincial premier said that the US ‘should respect Canadian sovereignty’.
“Carney said they ‘expect the US administration to respect Canadian sovereignty – I’m always clear with President Trump to that effect’.
Similarly, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said she expected US officials to leave discussions about the province’s ‘democratic process’ to Albertans and Canadians.”
PM Carney on separatists seeking assistance from the Trump administration: “I expect the US administration to respect Canadian sovereignty. I’m always clear in my conversation with President Trump to that effect.” pic.twitter.com/2IJjauMZMN
Danielle Smith on separatists seeking assistance from the Trump administration: “I would expect that the US administration would respect Canadian sovereignty and that they would confine their discussion about Alberta’s democratic process to Albertans and to Canadians.” pic.twitter.com/bbujbvmhl5
Alberta separatists are in the process of collecting signatures for a petition leading to a referendum on leaving Canada.
“British Columbia Premier David Eby said that ‘to go to a country and ask for assistance in breaking up Canada – there’s an old-fashioned word for that, and that word is ‘treason’’.”
David Eby on Alberta separatists seeking assistance from the U.S.: “To go to a foreign country and to ask for assistance in breaking up Canada, there’s an old-fashioned word for that. And that word is treason.” pic.twitter.com/DD3tGE0HSh
Jeffrey Rath, co-founder of the Alberta Prosperity Project, said that his group has travelled to Washington on three occasions in the last year.
He described the trips as ‘private citizens on a fact-finding basis’.
“Their meetings with senior officials were conducted as ‘a feasibility study’ on a possible $500bn (£362bn) line of credit should the province separate, he said, adding that his group was not soliciting funding.”
Woke Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar was sprayed with a liquid later identified as largely apple cider vinegar when a man rushed the stage during a Minneapolis town hall on immigration and federal enforcement on Jan. 27. President Donald Trump was informed and asked about the incident by ABC News and said he “doesn’t think” about her, calling her “a fraud” and asserting that “she probably had herself sprayed, knowing her.”
At a Minneapolis press briefing after the incident, Omar said “every time the President of the United States chooses to use hateful rhetoric to talk about me and the community that I represent, my death threats skyrocket,” adding that she does not believe she would need such extensive security if Trump were not in office, insinuating it’s the President’s fault she got squirted on. Social media erupted with posts and some right‑wing commentators echoed Trump’s insinuation by speculating that the widely recorded syringe attack was staged for political gain.
Asked directly on CNN how she responded to Trump’s claim that the squirting was staged — the anchor recounted his remark and pressed, “So when he claims it’s staged, you say…?” — Omar failed to address the allegation and deflected with their responses to political violence. “The difference between the president and I is that I was raised to be a decent human being, and my faith teaches me to have compassion — and he lacks both of those things,” she said, noting that she had publicly condemned the attempted assassination of Trump and called for “calmness and decency” after that attack.
Omar went on to accuse Trump and his administration of lying about the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, calling them “assassinations”, pointing to what she described as his contradictory statements about her. She suggested he was exhibiting “some sort of dementia” and said it might be time to consider invoking the 25th Amendment.
Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!
We all know Mike Lindell has been working tirelessly to expose Leftist frauds.
And woke corporations have dropped MyPillow products because of his efforts.
Now is your chance to support Mike — and get a set of his wonderful and luxurious bed sheets, too!
It’s an amazing deal on Mike’s Giza Dreams Bedsheets – now they are as low as $29.98 for a set of twin sheets! Order now because when they’re gone, they’re gone.
— “These sheets feel so soft and smooth when you slide into bed! They start off cool- which I love since I bought these for my camper bed! They do warm up to cozy but not hot during the night which I really love on cold fall nights.”
— “These sheets are the nicest I’ve ever owned. They are so soft and comfortable and fit my large extra mattress with a foam topper perfectly”
— “I purchased 2 sets of Giza dream sheets. I’m sold! The sheets are so comfortable & I love how they feel. So much I’m going to purchase 2 more sets. Another good thing the fitted sheet stays tucked under the mattress. Deep pockets. I promise you will love these sheets!!!”
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is currently holding a press conference on the Department of Justice’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act as the Administration comes under fire for not releasing all of the Epstein files as required by the law passed late last year.
Blanche opened the press conference, announcing that the Department of Justice is producing more than 3 million pages, more than 2,000 videos, and 180,000 images.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche will speak with reporters Friday morning as Justice Department (DOJ) continues to work its way through files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The Trump administration has received criticism over how slow the documents, required to be made public by law, have been released. DOJ officials have defended the timeline, however, citing the need for robust redactions to protect victims.
Blanche’s press conference also comes hours after the arrest of Don Lemon and other journalists by federal authorities. Lemon had drawn scrutiny from the administration in recent days over his coverage of anti-immigration enforcement protests at a church in Minnesota. Demonstrators targeted the church because one of its pastors was also an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official.
Blanche has defended the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the wake of two fatal shootings of U.S. residents and cast blame on Gov. Tim Walz (D) and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey (D) for the turmoil.
Elizabeth MacDonald: Okay, that was for our left Congresswoman, Ilhan Omar, claiming the Justice Department and Congress probing her sudden skyrocketing wealth to $30 million in just one year, that they have a problem with her living the American dream. You heard her say the goddamn United States of America. We’ve got new questions on where she and her husband got all that money.
Joining us now, Forbes Media Chair, Editor-in-Chief Steve Forbes. Steve, new information coming in in Forbes magazine, your magazine has a report of this, too. That the state of Delaware and Washington, DC, canceled the registrations for Omar’s husband’s investment firm, Rose Lake, for not paying its back taxes. We saw it owed more than $400,000 to Delaware and nearly $1,800 to DC. She’s claiming it’s worth $25 million from less than a grand a year before. How can his investment firm not afford to pay taxes? It’s supposedly worth an estimated 75 million to 150 million. This is really weird stuff.
Steve Forbes: Well, weird is not the word for it. There’s another word for it called crooked, and that’s why we have to have an investigation into this. As you know, the Biden administration started to examine her finances and that of her husband. And surprise, surprise, that investigation went nowhere. But it’s amazing how people can go into Congress and then become these entrepreneurial investing geniuses…
…She had under $1,000 of net worth, and her husband didn’t have much, and suddenly now they’re multimillionaires. Is there a money laundering operation here? And in terms of the firms themselves, they have a sketchy background, that winery in California that she and her husband own. Where did that come from? Where’s the wine there? And nobody can seem to find it. So there’s a lot of smelly stuff here. And that’s why in the American dream, her version of the American dream is the Al Capone version of the American dream, Tony Soprano version of the American Dream, and that is steal it, steal it from the taxpayers. And so there’s a lot of stuff here. And so when somebody cloaks themselves in the, Oh, the American dream… And, so you have numbers like this from minus $1,000 to $30, $40 million, you know something is not right.
Elizabeth MacDonald:There’s no evidence, public evidence, there’s even a winery. She valued it at five million. His investment firm is real. Well, it’s supposedly real. It’s DC headquarters appear to share office space at a WeWork, Steve. There’s no track record of his firm managing money, doing M&A deals, no clients we see, investment deals or any work that’s been done. They say they do work in 80 nations they’re operating in. There’s no SEC registrations from them as investment advisors. What is going on here? This increasingly looks sketchy, both the winery and his investment firm.
Steve Forbes: …Suddenly, all that 30 million, I think you’re going to find, I’ll make a speculation or prediction, that 30 million came from sources that are illegal, period.
Steve Forbes, chairman and editor-in-chief of Forbes, says Ilhan Omar and her husband are running a money laundering operation
Ilhan Omar’s husbands investment firm was looked into, THERE IS NO RECORDS OF THEM MANAGING MONEY, “NO CLIENTS”
Don Lemon speaks out after helping lead a leftist riot in a St. Paul church nd allegedly committing multiple crimes in the process. Credit: X/Screenshot
Former CNN hack Don Lemon has been arrested for actions earlier this month inside a St. Paul church.
As NBC reported, he was covering the Grammy awards on Thursday night when federal agents took him into custody.
He is facing conspiracy against rights charges and violation of the FACE Act.
Lemon’s attorney,Abbe Lowell, released the following statement:
Instead of investigating the federal agents who killed two peaceful Minnesota protesters, the Trump Justice Department is devoting its time, attention and resources to this arrest, and that is the real indictment of wrongdoing in this case.
This unprecedented attack on the First Amendment and transparent attempt to distract attention from the many crises facing this administration will not stand.
Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed Lemon’s arrest and added that three additional agitators: Trahern Jeen Crews, Georgia Fort, and Jamael Lydell Lundy were apprehended as well.
At my direction, early this morning federal agents arrested Don Lemon, Trahern Jeen Crews, Georgia Fort, and Jamael Lydell Lundy, in connection with the coordinated attack on Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, radical anti-ICE agitators stormed Cities Church in St. Paul on January 18, interrupting Christians in the middle of worship.
Instead of condemning the mob’s conduct or defending the constitutional right to religious assembly, far-left ‘reporter’ Lemon inserted himself into the chaos—live-streaming the scene and aggressively confronting congregants who were already shaken by the intrusion.
This is the beginning of what’s going to happen here,” Lemon said as anti-ICE protestors shouted down the pastor and harassed parishioners.
“They’ve stopped the service — a lot of people, a number of people have left,” Lemon said.
Lemon later rushed to the church altar and tried to lecture a pastor about the First Amendment. This just further incited the wicked mob of demons.
As TGP readers know, the First Amendment DOES NOT protect against unlawful assembly, which is what this riot was.
A corrupt magistrate judge named Douglas L. Micko previously refused to sign off on an arrest warrant for Lemon, likely because the judge’s wife works as an Assistant Attorney General in Minnesota AG Keith Ellison’s office.
Newly released footage analysed and distributed by BBC News in partnership with The News Movement appears to show Alex Pretti spitting toward or on a federal immigration agent and twice kicking a federal law enforcement in its rear, shattering the taillight, during a 13 January confrontation with ICE agents, 11 days before he was fatally shot by federal officers.
In the video, verified by BBC journalists and other outlets, after Pretti’s aggression, agents are seen exiting the SUV, grabbing Pretti by the jacket, tackling him to the pavement and pinning him down as tear gas or chemical irritants are deployed into the surrounding crowd. CBS News, ABC News and local affiliates report that Pretti’s family and attorney have confirmed it is him in the footage and say he was injured in the encounter but did not seek medical treatment at the time.
CNN, in a separate reconstruction of the shooting that killed Pretti, previously reported that, according to people briefed on the case, the Jan. 13 clash left him with a broken rib roughly a week before agents shot him multiple times after resisting arrest during agents attempts to carry out Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis. These two reports seem to line up and actually reveal, Alex Pretti clearly displayed violent behavior at so called “peaceful protests.”
The newly surfaced video has intensified debate over Pretti’s actions, with some critics arguing on social media that spitting at officers and damaging a federal vehicle showed him to be an aggressor and undermined portrayals of him as a purely peaceful protester. On Truth Social and X, high‑profile conservative accounts amplified the clip, with some users labeling Pretti a “domestic terrorist” and suggesting the earlier tail light incident showed a pattern of hostility toward law enforcement.
Comment threads on Facebook posts by local TV stations sharing the video are filled with users condemning Pretti for “fighting with a federal agent” or mocking supporters who question the footage’s authenticity, even as others are attempting to insist that nothing in the January 13 video justifies his later killing.
Sponsor | https://www.purgestore.com | Use promo code DREW for 20% off and support The Gateway Pundit today!
If I told you that 82 senior citizens that average 75 years old donated $11,516,000 in over 537,000 separate individual donations would you believe me?
Me neither!
According to the FEC, this group of senior citizens that average 75 years of age did just that!
Note: (The ages were determined with google searches that included the addresses and names.)
These donations of more than half a million separate donations (allegedly) only average $21.41 each.
Why?
That way the “masters of political money laundering” had hoped to stay “under the radar”. It worked for almost two decades. In the last few years investigative reporters such as James O Keefe, Peter Bernegger and Bob Cushman have foiled this great conspiracy that is believed to have laundered somewhere over a billion dollars in the last two decades through ActBlue with the probable complicity of the FEC.
This is what we call “smurfing” AKA money laundering.
This is illegal!
What is smurfing? “Smurfing” involves making many small financial transactions to avoid reporting thresholds (e.g., for money laundering). In political campaign law there are two important functions which are “bypassed”.
It is generally required that the actual name of the donor be assigned to each donation.
There are strict limits on how much an individual may contribute.
In “smurfing” (i.e. money laundering) these laws are ignored.
(Note: This report is an expansion of a previous analysis of 72 smurfs. This report adds 10 smurfs that are found contributing to Missouri Congressman Wesly Bell.)
82 Smurfs Exposed!
Screenshot
The 82 smurf table above was accomplished by combining previously discovered smurfs as follows:
20 smurfs attributed to Cory Booker (Corey Booker was the common denominator in terms of campaign committees that paid large sum of money to the business interests of Judge Mechan’s daughter. All 20 smurfs donated to Bookers campaign committee thru ActBlue.)I have reported my findings of laundered money to the Judge Merchan family in a letter to the judiciary Committee/ Jim Jordan. In my research utilizing the FEC database I identified 20 money mules AKA “Smurfs” whose identities that I believed were stolen to launder money to money to various democratic entities. Isn’t it remarkable that just 20 individuals are shown to have donated about 2.6 million dollars in about 188,000 donations! Note Loren Merchan is the daughter of Judge Juan Merchan.)
22 smurfs attributed to Mark Kelly (AZ Senator and The Seditious Six Leader) – bjhi89In late 2025 and early 2026, U.S. Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ), a retired Navy captain and astronaut, became the subject of intense scrutiny and administrative action by the Department of Defense (DoD) under Secretary Pete Hegseth, following accusations of “sedition” made by President Donald Trump.
The “Seditious” Allegation – The Video: In November 2025, Senator Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds released a video message to U.S. service members, stating: “Our laws are clear: you can refuse illegal orders”.
The Reaction: President Trump accused the lawmakers of “seditious behavior,” initially suggesting in a social media post that it was “punishable by DEATH”. Pentagon Action: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth labelled the comments as “seditious in nature” and a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Hegseth claimed that by telling troops to refuse orders, Kelly was undermining the chain of command and engaging in “reckless misconduct”.
10 smurfs attributed to Fani Willis (Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her office were removed from the Trump case after the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled there was an appearance of impropriety tied to Willis’ romantic relationship with the special prosecutor she appointed to lead the case. A replacement prosecutor dismissed the case in November.)
10 smurfs attributed to Tim Walz ( Governor Tim Walz faces intense criticism, primarily from Republicans, for massive fraud in Minnesota’s social programs (like child care and school meals) occurring under his watch, with allegations of “money laundering” through fraudulent claims. President Trump has vowed to get to the truth in this case.)
10 smurfs attributed to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. (In January 2026, U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) is at the center of intense scrutiny and multiple investigations related to large-scale fraud within Minnesota’s Somali community and her own personal finances.)
10 Smurfs attributed to Missouri Congressman Wesley Bell.
Wesley Bell, the U.S. Representative for Missouri’s 1st District and former St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney, has faced several controversies and “problems” involving campaign finances, government spending, and political backlash
Campaign Funds Used for Luxury Vehicle: In 2024, Bell’s campaign reportedly spent $35,000 to purchase a luxury Denali Ultimate SUV, a move that has drawn scrutiny from ethics watchdogs regarding the personal use of campaign funds.
Staffer Altercation: During a heated town hall in August 2025, a staffer or associate of Bell was reportedly involved in a physical altercation with a protester, leading to further local condemnation.
Money Laundering Recipients of 82 Smurfs
Screenshot
82 Smurfs feeding the Democratic Party Money Laundering
The chart above shows some of the primary recipients of the 11.5 million dollars that pretty much describes the Democratic Party. There are more but this cross-section should serve as a clear indication of the purposeful management/direction of this Massive Money Laundering effort.
It seems clear to this reporter that the purpose of this smurfing (money laundering) is to provide “under the cover of darkness” large sums of money to Democratic candidates and committees and escape the limits of contributions and the revelations of the source of this money.
What is ActBlue?
ActBlue describes itself as:
“ActBlue is an American Democratic Party political action committee and fundraising platform founded in 2004. ActBlue is a major part of the Democratic Party’s fundraising infrastructure. As of 2025, ActBlue reports that it has raised $16 billion for Democratic candidates and causes since it was established.”
According to AI:
“Current Events and Investigations (2025–2026)
DOJ Investigation: In April 2025, following a presidential memorandum, the Department of Justice began investigating allegations of “straw donor” schemes and foreign contributions through the platform.
Congressional Subpoenas: As of mid-2025, several House committees issued subpoenas to ActBlue and its employees, alleging a lack of security protocols like CVV verification. ActBlue has maintained that these investigations are “politically motivated attacks” and noted that they began requiring CVV codes for all new donations in 2023.
Internal Restructuring: In early 2025, the organization saw the resignation of seven senior staffers, leading to concerns from employee unions about organizational stability.”
According to Conservatives
“In 2026, conservative figures and Republican lawmakers characterize ActBlue not just as a fundraising tool, but as a primary target for investigations into campaign finance irregularities and potential foreign interference.
According to prominent conservative perspectives:
A “Conduit” for Fraudulent Donations: Republican officials, including President Donald Trump and House Oversight chairs, have alleged that ActBlue’s platform facilitates “straw” or “dummy” donations. A 2025 House Republican report accused the platform of allowing “donation fraud” and “laundering” by failing to implement rigorous security protocols.
A Vulnerability for Foreign Interference: Conservatives claim ActBlue’s past failure to require credit card CVV codes and its acceptance of prepaid gift cards created “potential vulnerabilities” that hostile foreign powers—such as China, Russia, or Iran—could exploit to illegally influence U.S. elections.
Target of Presidential and State-Level Probes: In April 2025, President Trump signed a memorandum directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate ActBlue for violating federal election laws. State Attorneys General, such as Ken Paxton (Texas) and Jason Miyares (Virginia), have launched their own investigations into “suspicious” donor activity on the platform.
Exploitative Toward Retirees: Some conservative critics point to “anomalous” data showing elderly Americans making thousands of small donations annually, suggesting these individuals may be unaware their names are being used or are being targeted by predatory recurring-donation tactics.”
What is WinRed?
WinRed describes itself as:
“WinRed is the #1 fundraising technology used by conservatives. Donors from across the country can easily connect with causes and candidates that they support.”
_____________________________________
Investigative Reporters Peter Bernegger and Bob Cushman have reported that WinRed also commits money laundering and uses smurfs. Although WinRed appears to “cheat” in a similar fashion as ActBlue, the degree and time duration is only a fraction of ActBlue’s “malignancy”.
Although WinRed was established in 2014, it did not establish itself as a major player until 2020.
WinRed has effectively only functioned for 25% as many years as ActBlue.
Why have the Republicans not championed against this fraud?
Sadly, the Republican Party has not championed the fight against this outrageous fraud. The obvious reason is that many Republicans have either chosen to follow suit in receiving laundered money or have discovered that it was happening when it was too late to return the illegal campaign donations.
What is the biggest problem with this money laundering?
Our beloved country is supposed to have been established as a “government of the people, by the people, for the people”.
That is not what we currently have.
We have a “government of special interests, by special interests, for special interests”.
As long as we allow massive amounts of money to pollute and corrupt our elected officials we will never obtain the representation that we long for, that we deserve. This is precisely why we are at or near an all time low of approval on Congress according to the recent Gallop poll.
Screenshot
Money is coming from outside of our country!
In a very informative news discussion between Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Charlie LeDuff in a “No BS Newshour Episode #395” and campaign strategist Jason Roe (Fraudette Smurf – YouTube) it was stated that ActBlue has allegedly received over 16 billion dollars since 2004. It was also revealed that several senior members of ActBlue have abruptly resigned since allegations of fraud have come forward and several federal investigations have begun in 2025.
Jason Roe stated that people working within political campaigns for many years have been aware of the money laundering that was enabled by ActBlue and that Charlie LeDuff had, within the first few minutes of Episode 395, done a far better job of explaining how ActBlue had laundered money than any mainstream media ever had!
Jason Roe further states that:
This activity is fraud
This activity is money laundering
This activity is funneling money from outside the US
That Republicans are now outraising Democrats for the first time in a decade
A break down of each Smurf group
It is believed that presenting each of the 6 smurf groups individually will make it easier to actually see the big picture of this massive money laundering system by Democratic candidates, committees and other malignant entities.
The Corey Booker Smurfs
The Cory Booker Smurfs were first identified when investigative reporter Bob Cushman researched the money laundering that was flowing to Authentic Campaigns, a company run by Judge Mechan’s daughter.
FOLLOW THE MONEY!
The Freedom Press recently researched the FEC database concerning money that was flowing into Judge Merchan’s daughters company, Authentic Campaigns, and found over $73,000,000, mostly from Democratic campaigns being paid to the judges daughter’s company.
The details of Authentic Campaigns Inc’s money influx can be seen HERE.
The Characteristics of the Cory Booker Smurfs are as follows:
Screenshot
Notice how the seniors involved have an average age of 80 years old and that the average donation is only $13.85. This usage of seniors and small donations was done to attempt to stay under the radar. It is believed that this was not actions by seniors but rather identity theft.
Some consider this senior abuse.
The spreadsheet below is provided to allow the reader to visualize how completely the money laundering was integrated into the Democratic Party. The following candidates, committees and party committees (and others) were the recipients of over 2.6 million dollars from these 20 smurfs.
Gretchen Whitmer
DNC
DCCC
DSCC
Progressive Takeover
Hillary Clinton
Kamala Harris
Joe Biden
Cory Booker
Mark Kelly
Nancy Pelosi
Chuck Schumer
Adam Schiff
Elissa Slotkin
Raphael Warnock
Jon Ossoff
Elizabeth Warren
Amy Klobuchar
Gary Peters
John Fetterman
Hakeem Jeffries
Maggie For NH
Screenshot
Mark Kelly Smurfs
Screenshot
The 22 Mark Kelly Smurfs are “alleged” to have donated about 4.8 million dollars in about 134,000 separate donations which only average $35.91 each. This malfeasance is clearly illegally manufactured fiction. We await the investigation that Trump ordered AG Pam Bondi to conduct!
Screenshot
The above chart visually demonstrates the amazing degree that the “manufactured, fraudulent donations from the Mark Kelly Smurfs support the Democratic Party!
More detail can be gleaned from the following report regarding the “Money Laundering by the Seditious Six” HERE.
Fani Willis Smurfs
Screenshot
The Fani Willis Smurf Characteristics study above demonstrates the “alleged” 1.7 million dollars that were made in over 73,000 donations by these 10 seniors. The average age of these ten smurfs is 70 years of age. The average donation is only $24.24 which is well below the “radar threshold” that the criminals that performed this malfeasance hoped would keep them safe from justice.
It won’t!
Screenshot
The criminals that manufactured this money laundering did an excellent job of integrating the laundered money into the structure of the Democratic Party. The above chart that shows the recipients of the Fani Willis Smurfs.
More detailed can be obtained from this report concerning money laundering by Fani Willis HERE.
Tim Walz Smurfs
Screenshot
The (10) Tim Walz smurfs above have “allegedly” donated over $650,000.00 in 38,928 separate donations that only average $16.80 each. The average age of this group of smurfs is 75 years old.
Screenshot
The state of Minnesota reports that Tim Walz has received over $13,446,000 in 49,432 donations. The average equates to $272.00.
Ilhan Omar Smurfs
Screenshot
The 10 Ilhan Omar Smurfs shown have “allegedly” donated over one half a million dollars in 51,381 donations that only average $9.86 each. The average age of this group of “smurfs” is 75 years old.
Screenshot
The state of Minnesota reports that Ilhan Omar has received over $20,000,000 in 176,921 donations, primarily over the past 9 years.
Wesley Bell Smurfs
A friend of mine recently inspired me to take a look at politicians from Missouri. I decided to begin by looking at Congressman Wesly Bell.
I began by looking at Wesley Bell’s campaign donations and looking for the types of donations that suggest the alleged donor is a smurf. I follow up suspicious donors by downloading the last two decades of donations of that suspected smurf to anyone.
When I see unbelieveable history such as 4,000 separate donations that total over 119,000 dollars, I identify that individual as a smurf. I then look up that person’s age to see if it seems to be another case of stolen senior identity. It almost always is.
This time I decided that I would compare my findings to those of Peter Bernegger. Peter has a website that I encourage you to check out. It is https://electionwatch.info.
Peter and his team of database experts have painstakingly analyzed every zip code in America looking for smurfs (money laundering). He has found and documented thousands of smurfs and made that information publicly available.
His computerized method is far faster than mine and his assumptions/definitions (AKA algorithms) are somewhat different but he is able to process far more information than I can.
I am happy to see that despite our different approaches we still attain similar results. In the case of my (10) Wesley Bell Smurf analyses, you can see the comparison of Cushman’s results and Bernegger’s results.
The fact that there are differences does not matter. If a person commits 1400 or 1600 cases of money laundering, should the question of guilt be any different?
Screenshot
These 10 smurfs are alleged to have donated over $1,150,000 in 52,000 separate donations. This author does not believe that this actually occurred. ActBlue has some serious explaining to do!
Screenshot
Detailed Comparison of Wesly Bell’s Smurfs By Analysis Version
