U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is in Asheville, North Carolina, today, hosting a two-day G20 finance ministers and central bank governors meeting.
During an interview with CNBC’s Sara Eisen on Monday morning, Eisen asked whether markets should treat the latest U.S.–Canada tariff fight as a “tit-for-tat trade war.”
Bessent took the opportunity to dismiss Canada’s leverage and mock Ottawa’s posture.
Sara Eisen: And finally, are you meeting with your Canadian counterpart here?
Secretary Bessent: I am.
Sara Eisen: Because I guess markets wondering if we’re now in a tit-for-tat trade war with Canada.
Secretary Bessent: Well, I don’t think you can be in a tit-for-tat with someone who’s 13 times larger than you are.
Sara Eisen: They say they’re doing okay.
Secretary Bessent: What else are they going to say?
You know, look, I think this is very unfortunate that Prime Minister Carney has turned this into a political shouting match. I mean, we’re not at war with Canada.
How are we going to be at war with Canada?
What are they going to take their two submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sic them on us?
You know, he came to power on an anti-American, anti-Trump agenda. He was 20 points behind in the poll, and then he started this.
And it’s unfortunate that he’s not doing what’s best for the Canadian people.
He’s doing what is best for the Liberal Party, what’s best for Mark Carney.
And in the long run, the Canadian people are going to see through that.
And, you know, I will say that they were offered the best trade deal of any, any country on the globe, and he chose to walk away from it at the last minute.
Watch:
LMAO! Scott Bessent is absolutely CLOWNING ON Canada after their “threats” against us
“What are they gonna do? Take their 2 submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sic them on us?”
“I don’t think you can be in a tit-for-tat with someone who’s 13 times larger than you are!” pic.twitter.com/zV3TYMsX3T
A federal grand jury issued a subpoena to James Comey’s mole, Daniel Richman, as part of a new investigation into Comey’s leaking classified information to The New York Times.
After James Comey was fired as FBI Director by President Trump in May 2017, he gave contents of his classified ‘Trump memos’ to his friend and Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman.
Richman then leaked contents of the classified memos to The New York Times.
The leak of Comey’s ‘Trump memos’ by Daniel Richman to the New York Times in May of 2017, triggered the appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel.
The DOJ launched a new investigation into Comey’s classified leaks to the media through Daniel Richman after a judge previously blocked the DOJ from obtaining Richman’s electronics.
A federal grand jury issued a subpoena to former FBI Director James Comey’s longtime friend and advisor on Monday as part of a new investigation into Comey allegedly leaking classified information to the media.
The subpoena targets former Comey adviser Daniel Richman and indicates that the Justice Department has launched a fresh investigation into the leak of classified information to the New York Times. The issue was also investigated under President Donald Trump’s first term, but was cut off when former President Joe Biden entered office.
James Comey knew his ‘friend’ Daniel Richman was talking to the media, backing up claims in then-Interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan’s case against the former FBI Director.
Comey was clearly working with Daniel Richman to anonymously leak information about Hillary Clinton’s email scandal to the New York Times.
This contradicts Comey’s claims that he was being maliciously prosecuted.
Trump U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan files public response to James Comey’s motion to dismiss his indictment for vindictive prosecution.
Exhibit 13 includes bombshell, damning evidence of then-FBI Director Comey’s handwritten note–on FBI director letterhead–evidencing… pic.twitter.com/IsRwSZDg7P
Last year, a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted James Comey. He was indicted on two counts – false statements and obstruction of a congressional proceeding.
The charges were related to Comey’s testimony to Senate investigators in September 2020 about whether he authorized leaks to the media.
Newly released November 2016 emails reveal that James Comey was guiding his media mole, Daniel Richman, and authorized leaks to the media.
Comey’s case was eventually thrown out after a Clinton judge dismissed the case based on the Appointments Clause.
Last year, Daniel Richman filed a lawsuit and sought to block the Justice Department from accessing his files as the Trump Administration moved to hit James Comey with another indictment.
The feds seized materials from Daniel Richman several years ago, and he asked a judge to block the DOJ from accessing his files.
US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, a Clinton appointee, would not let the feds search Richman’s personal computer hard drive for additional classified information without a search warrant.
Judge Kollar-Kotelly previously ordered the DOJ to return all materials it seized from Comey’s media mole a week after she blocked federal prosecutors from accessing key evidence in the criminal case against James Comey.
There’s fear that the Kiev blackouts from last winter will return even worse
First, food shortages – now, blackouts and lack of heating?
After Volodymyr Zelensky launched a 40-day campaign of missile and drone strikes against Russian economic infrastructure, Moscow has retaliated with overwhelming force.
The recent wave of attacks, besides targeting military sites, weapons and ammo depots, has also destroyed around 90% of Ukraine’s commercial warehouses, and now there’s widespread reports of empty shelves in the country’s markets and grocery stores.
Empty shelves in Kiev
But with the upcoming winter, there’s widespread fear that the situation will become much worse, as the Russian forces are preparing for a ‘significant offensive against Ukrainian energy infrastructure’.
This has been announced today by the Russian defense ministry.
BREAKING – Russia says preparing ‘massive strikes’ against Ukraine’s energy sector: ministry
“In a post on Telegram, the ministry said Russian forces had ‘begun preparations to launch massive strikes against Ukraine’s energy facilities’, describing the move as retribution for Kiev’s targeting of Russian energy infrastructure.
Earlier this month, Ukrainian Energy Minister Denys Shmyhal told POLITICO that ‘Putin wants to finish off (Ukraine’s) energy system’ and that Kyiv would work on strengthening its energy and infrastructure resilience to avoid a repeat of last winter’s freezing blackouts.”
“The warning revives fears of a repeat of last winter, when Moscow’s bombardment of Ukrainian power plants devastated the country’s grid and left millions without heat or electricity in sub-zero temperatures.
[…] Overall, Russia launched two Iskander-M ballistic missiles and 130 drones of various types between late Saturday and early Sunday, the Ukrainian air force said.”
Ex-wife of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could cause significant harm to the Royal Family with her revelations.
After getting thrown out of Royal Lodge mansion along with former prince Andrew, Sarah Ferguson did her best to disappear from public view – but now she is back with a vengeance.
Fergie is now reported to be negotiating to appear in a television documentary to tell ‘her side of the story’ regarding her long association with late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Sarah Ferguson ‘set for tell-all TV documentary’ after shock return to UKhttps://t.co/ceLx3Y5ezm
“The former Duchess of York is said to be weighing up “many approaches” from producers keen for her to tell her version of her alleged role in the Epstein scandal.
However, she was considering working on her own program to retain control of the narrative, The Sun reported.”
Former Editor of The Sun Kelvin Mackenzie reacts to reports Sarah Ferguson is set for a ‘tell-all TV documentary’ following her shock return to the UK.
Ferguson and Andrew lost their royal titles and privileges in the wake of relentless revelations of their close friendship with Epstein.
“Ms Ferguson is believed to have been staying at a chalet in Verbier, a Swiss ski resort. The property belonged to Paddy McNally, a racing tycoon who was one of her closest friends. McNally died last month aged 88.”
But now, she will reportedly rent a six-bedroom gated property in the Home Counties, and is expected to move into the house as soon as next week.
“A source told [The Sun]: ‘Fergie has been bombarded with requests from all over the world to do sit-down interviews, especially with the big streamers, to tell her side of the story. She is looking at her options. For her, it’s more about retaining editorial control rather than making money. Sarah has a tight-knit group of friends and is extremely well connected. She would only allow someone she knew well to tell her story’.”
For most of us, Microsoft Office has been the go-to software for getting things done. Many of us use Word for documents, Excel for spreadsheets — and a lot of us use Outlook and PowerPoint.
The problem is that Microsoft Office is free on a work computer — but costs a fortune on a home computer. To buy Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and all the other parts of Microsoft Office can reach a stunning $219.99.
The package includes MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, OneNote, Publisher & Access.
People are saying:
– “All the apps in Office without having to be on a yearly subscription, and at a reasonable price. Download link and license key provided quickly after purchase.”
– “I like the fact it is the full deal – and that I don’t have to deal with a yearly subscription. It is good for as long as own this computer. So, I am luckier than last time – this should last me at least 5 years as I now have a brand new computer.”
– “Downloaded and installed without any problem – seems like a good deal. Word can open and edit PDF files so no need for another PDF editor.”
Included in the package are:
Lifetime license for MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, OneNote, Publisher & Access
One-time purchase installed on 1 computer for use at home or work
Instant Delivery & Download – access your software license keys and download links instantly
Free customer service – only the best support!
Normally, a lifetime license to Microsoft Office Professional 2021 would set you back $219.99 — for a limited time, you can get it on sale for only $29.97.
Denmark is under pressure for its decades-long ‘IUD’ campaign.
Against the background of Donald J. Trump’s vows to control the Danish autonomous territory of Greenland, the relationship between Greenland and Denmark is under tremendous stress.
After the publication of two contradictory expert reports, heated debates continue on the nature of the campaign of forced contraception of almost half of Inuit women.
Major developments re: Donald Trump’s designs on Greenland:
Greenland’s official genocide report finds a reasonable basis to believe Denmark violated the Genocide Convention by implanting Greenlandic girls with birth-control devices without consent.
“Did Denmark commit genocide against the Greenlandic people between 1960 and the 1990s? […] On Friday 28 August, two expert reports, made public by the Greenlandic government, were supposed to provide the beginning of an answer. But their divergent conclusions have caused even more confusion.”
It’s estimated that over 4,000 Greenlandic women were affected, starting as young as 12 and 13 years old.
“Breaking the silence, some of them recount the trauma they felt when the IUD was inserted into their uterus. Many say they did not give their consent. This forced sterilization will have serious consequences. Some have infections and become sterile. Others repress the memory and discover, years later during a medical examination, the presence of this contraceptive that prevents them from having children.”
The birth rate in Greenland, then the highest in the world, collapsed from the 1970’s onward.
“The Social Democrats of Siumut and the nationalists of Naleraq demand that Denmark be brought before an international court. For her part, the Minister of Health, Mariane Paviasen, said that she could not ‘affirm, on behalf of the government, that there was genocide’ and that the debate should continue.
The Greenlandic government, on the other hand, is proposing to set up a reconciliation commission. Not to ‘assign responsibility’, but to ‘shed light on the truth from a perspective of reconciliation’, explained Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen.”
Denmark’s Parliament overwhelmingly approved compensation for Greenlandic women and girls who had IUDs inserted without their consent or without adequate informed consent.
The case concerns procedures carried out under Danish authorities between 1960 and 1991, with some of those… pic.twitter.com/DupJQg9RPN
The far-left Washington Post just did what the legacy media always does when American troops are in harm’s way and a Republican is running the Pentagon.
They published material from a classified Secretary of Defense Orders Book, the document that maps warships, aircraft, weapons systems, and personnel worldwide, and dressed it up as a hit piece on Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.
The Washington Post reported Sunday that several senior military leaders warned War Secretary Pete Hegseth that maintaining a force of more than 50,000 American troops in the Middle East is unsustainable and could weaken the United States’ ability to respond to threats elsewhere.
The newspaper acknowledged that its reporting was based on information contained in the classified Aug. 14 edition of the Secretary of Defense Orders Book, or SDOB.
The classified orders book reportedly details the worldwide availability and allocation of American warships, aircraft, weapons systems, and military personnel. It also contains sensitive assessments submitted by America’s senior commanders.
According to the Post, some troops deployed to the Middle East were ordered to remain through September, while others could remain into 2027.
Four senior commanders reportedly submitted formal “non-concurs” expressing disagreement with the proposed extensions:
Adm. Daryl Caudle, Chief of Naval Operations
Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, Commander of U.S. European Command
Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Commander of U.S. Southern Command
Adm. Samuel Paparo, Commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command
A “non-concur” does not mean that a commander is refusing to follow an order. It records a commander’s professional disagreement while acknowledging that the order will still be executed.
Washington Post military affairs reporter Dan Lamothe eagerly amplified the purported contents of the classified document.
“Four-stars all non-concurring with prolonging operations against Iran as they are into 2027, per this Washington Post exclusive,” Lamothe wrote, before listing the four commanders.
DataRepublican argued that the commanders’ assessments were not the most alarming part of the story. The real scandal, she said, was that someone apparently handed information from one of the Pentagon’s most sensitive force-allocation documents to the Washington Post.
DataRepublican wrote:
“Hello Mr. Lamothe,
Four generals’ analysis is not the important point here. The article says that the information comes from Aug. 14 Secretary of Defense Orders Book (SDOB).
As that article explains, the SDOB is classified and lays out the worldwide availability of warships, aircrafts, weapons systems, personnel, along with assessments from senior commanders. That includes which leaders “non-concurred” which you are amplifying.
This is one of the most serious leaks I have ever seen, and you are using this to score partisan points against Hegseth.
You and your miltwitter journalist sphere spent a whole week hammering a DOGE-affiliated analyst for refusing to leak sensitive documents, accusing her of violating “ethics.”
Perhaps the ethics were just arbitrary conveniences all along. Perhaps the professional code exists to protect the true raison d’etre that you and the rest of legacy Pentagon press corps exist by:
By your twisted morality, it’s fine to handle materials that might very well undermine an active war and publish whatever you’d like from them in order to score political points against Pete Hegseth. Just as long as you “disclose,” that makes it fine for WaPo to protect traitors running in our midst.
And in your personal case, “disclosing” apparently doesn’t extend to fellowships at CNAS and other engagement heavily funded by the military-industrial complex.
The United States is engaged in active combat operations. WaPo holds material that may very well undermine the safety of Americans in harms way. WaPo took routine discussion of a serious internal force-allocation problem, and elevated that into cheap partisan shots.
The one without ethics here is the entire staff of the Washington Post who did not immediately turn in this traitor as soon as they received the material.”
Hello Mr. Lamothe,
Four generals’ analysis is not the important point here. The article says that the information comes from Aug. 14 Secretary of Defense Orders Book (SDOB).
As that article explains, the SDOB is classified and lays out the worldwide availability of warships,…
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) August 30, 2026
“Publishing highly classified assessments from the Secretary’s orders book is a crime.
It’s a betrayal of the force. And much of what they’re publishing is inaccurate.
Of course, we demand candid military advice. Non-concurs are standard. The Secretary sees them constantly. That’s how you run a real military.
We are in great shape around the world. This story isn’t about readiness.
It’s TDS and PDS — they hate President Trump and Secretary Hegseth more than they love America.”
Lamothe responded by wrapping himself in the banner of “independent journalism.”
“Fact check: Independent journalism is not a crime,” Lamothe wrote. “It’s also especially important at a time when government officials are withholding key details and concerns about a war being fought on behalf of the American people with their taxpayer dollars.”
The Washington Post also defended its actions.
“We’re confident in our reporting, our sourcing and the constitutional protections that guarantee the rights of news organizations to publish information in the public interest that holds officials accountable,” Washington Post spokesperson Olivia Petersen said in a statement.
“The assertion that such publication is a crime is both incorrect and irresponsible.”
They always say “public interest” when the target is Trump or Hegseth. They never say “public interest” when the leak would embarrass a Democrat administration or expose how Biden’s team hid Abbey Gate documents in safes.
But the Post’s statement conveniently sidestepped the most important question: Who had access to the classified Secretary of Defense Orders Book, and who handed its contents to the newspaper?
The legal protections claimed by the Post do not automatically shield the government employee or military official who allegedly provided the classified information. That person could face serious criminal exposure if an investigation determines the disclosure was unauthorized.
Nigerian Christians are suffering roadside ambushes and intentional crop destruction at the hands of Fulani Muslims. Photo by local journalist Paul.
Fulani bandits blocked the Gusau-Funtua Federal Highway near Unguwar Chida village in Tsafe Local Government Area, Zamfara State, at about 4:05 p.m. on August 25. The attackers opened fire on two commercial vehicles, an unregistered Sharon car and a Sokoto State Transport Authority bus. Eight travelers were killed, eight were abducted, and nine others sustained gunshot wounds.
Hours later, at about 6:45 p.m., the same group attacked Magazu village in Tsafe LGA, wounding a 35-year-old resident with a stray bullet. Police and military forces pursued the attackers and reported killing 17 suspected Fulani bandits in a subsequent gun battle near the Funtua-Gusau highway, according to a statement from Police Public Relations Officer DSP Yazid Abubakar.
In a separate attack at about 9 p.m. on August 28, a woman, Mrs. Helen John, was killed by suspected Fulani assailants in Batok 2 Village, Riyom Local Government Area, Plateau State. Nigerian troops responding to reports of sporadic gunfire discovered her body. A preliminary investigation indicated that the assailants had laid an ambush, concealing themselves in a maize farm near her residence before attacking her as she performed household chores. Her body was handed over to community leaders, while security forces began efforts to track down and arrest the assailants.
A third ambush, reported by a stringer in Bassa Local Government Area, Plateau State, followed the same pattern.
At about 8:00 a.m. on August 25, 2026, suspected Fulani herdsmen laid an ambush along a road in Miango, Bassa LGA, approximately 30 kilometers west of Jos. They attacked two Christian villagers, Joseph Rugu, 45, and Chayi Demi, 40, as they returned from a funeral, killing both with machetes.
In a separate incident at approximately 1:00 a.m. on August 26, Fulani militias entered Zherenvi, Rewienku, and destroyed 19 hectares of tomato, cabbage, and green bean crops, as well as more than 20 hectares of cornfields, using machetes and other means.
Fulani herders often use their cattle to destroy crops in the fields of Christian farmers or use machetes to destroy vegetables, leaving Christian families with nothing to eat.
In a press release signed by National Publicity Secretary Joseph Chudu Yonkpa, the Irigwe Youth Movement (IYM) characterized the destruction as an attempt to weaponize poverty against Irigwe farmers, who were already facing high costs for fertilizer and other agricultural inputs.
The IYM called on Operation Enduring Peace (OPEP) in Plateau State, the Nigerian Police, Operation Rainbow, and other security agencies to investigate, arrest those responsible, and ensure that affected farmers receive compensation. It also called on the Executive Chairman of Bassa LGA, Hon. Dr. Joshua Sunday Riti, the Plateau State Emergency Management Agency (PLASEMA), and the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) to conduct an independent investigation into the extent of the damage and provide humanitarian relief.
The group urged Irigwe residents not to take the law into their own hands and to allow security agencies to continue their work.
On August 25, farm destruction in Nzhwerenvi Rewienku Village affected 11 identified farmers, with individual losses ranging from one to five hectares of cabbage and two to 2.5 hectares of tomatoes. Residents identified four suspected perpetrators. On August 26, the destruction of cornfields affected seven farmers, with individual losses ranging from two to four hectares.
Rev. David Rabo, a 56-year-old Christian resident and church elder from Nyang’o, Bassa Local Government Area, Plateau State, provided the account of the August 25 ambush near Miango as a firsthand witness in the affected community. He is affiliated with ECWA Rotsu, an Evangelical Church Winning All congregation, though he clarified he is not the resident pastor there.
Rabo described his community as agrarian, with residents engaged in both dry-season and rain-season farming and few other sources of employment aside from a handful of local institutions, including ECWA Secondary School and a rest home. He said the community is Christian and that residents are “doing well in serving God,” though he said some have grown desperate in their faith, having “met some people who think that if we have a God, why is it that the God is not protecting us.”
On security, Rabo said “the issue of security in our area is just something that is worrisome,” adding that the community has cried out to the government “that there is no help.” He said soldiers are scattered in the area but that “these killings continue,” noting three people were killed within the span of a week, including Joseph Rugu, 45, and Chayi Demi, 40, who had traveled to a burial in a neighboring village and were ambushed while returning home at around 8 a.m. He said the victims were “ambushed, shot, macheted,” and that their bodies were not recovered until the following morning.
Rabo attributed the attack to Fulani assailants, though he acknowledged there were no eyewitnesses to the ambush itself, saying the identification was “based on history and pattern.” He said his community has no conflict with any other neighboring tribe, only with Fulani herdsmen who “leave their place, come and attack us.” He said the responsible parties live in Fulani settlements “north and south” of his community, near the Bassa area, and said the same attackers destroyed roughly 11 farms of grown maize the same night.
Asked about motive, Rabo said the disputes center on land, with Fulani herdsmen claiming the community’s “soil, our water, our grass is good for their cattle.” He said this justification has at times been stated directly. “Sometimes they say it. They are living among us.”
Rabo said he was not aware of Fulani settlements engaging in violence against one another over grazing land. All of the violence has been directed against Christians. Because Christian communities have no weapons, either the government will have to intervene, disarm the Fulani, and protect Christians, or God will have to change the hearts of the Fulani.
In this vein, Rabo said, “There are some that you need them to say, ‘This thing, we don’t want it.’”
President Donald J. Trump, on Sunday morning, launched a blistering Truth Social broadside against NBC’s Kristen Welker after the “Meet the Fake Press” hostess claimed the President has had “mixed results” with his midterm endorsements.
According to a Fox News endorsement tracker, all 24 Trump-backed Senate candidates won their Republican primaries. Trump-endorsed House candidates won 214 of 218 races, an approximately 98% success rate.
Welker made the comment during a pre-show hit on NBC’s Washington affiliate WRC-TV, not even on the main Meet the Press broadcast.
She acknowledged Trump “loom[s] large” over the midterms, then immediately undercut him: “He’s had some mixed results, but most recently, his pick of Senator Darline Graham… was successful.”
Kristen Welker, the Unpopular “Hostess” of the once great Meet the Press, now considered Meet the Fake Press, just stated that Donald Trump has “mixed results” on his Endorsements of Candidates, when the recent WINS of Darline Graham and Mike Mazzei, stand at 100% for the U.S. Senate, and 98% for the U.S. House, recently and over the longterm.
How can anyone be allowed to say this, working for freely given Public Airwaves? Results are attached. Because of this purposeful inaccuracy, she will be reported to the FCC for rebuke or punishment.
Unfortunately, she is not the only one. The Radical Left News is going out of their way to harass, demean, and libel anything “TRUMP.”
Their new weapon is to say that my 99% SUCCESS Rate on Endorsements, 100% on Senatorial Endorsements (Many of whom were not even given a shot of winning until I Endorsed!), is either a mixed result, or not very good. In actuality, it is, without question, the strongest Endorsement in the History of Politics.
If it were not, I would be the first to admit it. Darline Graham’s run for the Senate was the biggest story in all of Politics, because she wasn’t expected to win, and then, when I Endorsed her, and she easily won, the story of her Victory was hardly covered by anybody.
Likewise, the future Governor of Oklahoma, who was behind in every Poll, I Endorsed him, he won, and the story was barely covered! The Press is a Disgrace to our Nation, and I hope that Chairman Brendan Carr, and the fine people of his Commission, will take this Threat to our Country very seriously.
Thank you for your attention to this very important matter of Fake Polls and Commentary!
NBC immediately circled the wagons around Welker.
“Kristen is one of the best in the business and we stand by her,” an NBC spokesperson told Fox News.
The fake news media spent years falsely insisting that Trump had lost his grip on Republican voters.
Now his candidates are winning virtually every congressional primary, and NBC still calls the results “mixed.”
It is ironic that in the same week that the Lindsay Clancy murder trial was wrapping up, the New York Post would run an article about moms being diagnosed with the alleged mental disorder ADHD. And regardless of the outcome, the Clancy trial, if anything, has shined a very bright light on the over-drugging of women as a method of behavioral “treatment,” making the Post’s article completely tone-deaf.
Surprisingly, of all the subjective psychiatric mental disorders Clancy had been diagnosed with, ADHDwas not one of them. But like Clancy’s diagnoses of depression, anxiety, bipolar I and II when it comes to ADHD, there just is no objective identifiable abnormality. The fact is there is no blood test, scan, or biomarker that identifies any sort of ADHD brain malfunction that can be targeted for treatment. It is also a fact that all ADHD diagnosing depends on verbal communication about personal history and behavior.
The gist of the Post’s article is that women are apparently learning from their own daughters struggle and according to one mother, “it kind of felt like my own childhood was being repeated in front of me.” Maybe. Sounds normal, but there isn’t any real difference in adult women and young girls diagnosing of ADHD other than one is current behavior and the other is historical.
According to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, (DSM-5), children ages 16 and under must meet 6 out of 9 symptoms such as running around, climbing on furniture, unable to sit still, missing school assignments, disorganized bedrooms, not paying attention in class, interrupting teachers or engaging in physically dangerous play.
Adult women, on the other hand, 17 and older, must meet only 5 out of 9 symptoms like restlessness, leg jiggling, a drive to always stay busy, missing work deadlines, struggling to balance chores/bills, losing focus, impulsive spending, interrupting conversations and making hasty decisions.
There you go, ladies, meet any five of these extraordinarily subjective behaviors and, voila, you have the mental disorder ADHD. In fact, the author of the article writes, “the reality is, ADHD can be a superpower…” One could argue that the reality is not who experiences these behaviors, but rather who doesn’t lose focus, spend too much money on things we really don’t need, and interrupt when others are talking? One could argue that the person who doesn’t exhibit these completely normal behaviors might be on some other psychiatric drug that renders the patient feeling nothing, allowing for any behavior to be appropriate.
Nevertheless, even though there is no malfunction of the brain that is ADHD, it is one of the top psychiatric diagnoses and drugging is the go-to “treatment.” Of course, the word “treatment” must be used lightly because there is no targeted abnormality but, rather, the chemical drug will change someone’s behavior. For example, methylphenidate (Ritalin, Concerta and Focalin) is a Schedule II controlled substance which means it carries a high potential for abuse and severe psychological or physical dependence. These stimulants reportedly help improve focus, reduce impulsivity and control hyperactive behavior in children and adults. According to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), like cocaine, “these drugs are considered dangerous.”
On the flip side, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) report that “the mode of action in man is not completely understood…there is neither specific evidence which clearly establishes the mechanism whereby Ritalin produces its mental and behavioral effects in children, nor conclusive evidence regarding how these effects relate to the condition of the central nervous system.” In other words, the FDA hasn’t got a clue how the drug “works” as “treatment” for the alleged ADHD.
There are, however, very real serious side effects associated with ADHD “treatments” that may need to be considered as part of that whole “superpower” thing, including irritability, anxiety, restlessness, sleep disorder, aggression, depression, abnormal behavior, confused state, nervousness, hallucinations, anger, suicidal ideation, altered mood, mania and abnormal thinking to name a few.
Then there is that other sticky matter of women who also may have been diagnosed with any number of other alleged mental disorders, like Lindsay Clancy, including depression, bipolar and anxiety. Are these women now embracing ADHD drugs on top of other mind-altering drug “treatments?”
Given the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that 20 million women in the U.S. take drugs as “treatment” for depression, it seems possible that there could be some serious crossover cocktail “treatments.” Women make up more than half of the population using antipsychotics and one in five women take an antianxiety medication.
Given these staggering drugging data, it seems impossible that there are any women left in the U.S. who aren’t drugged for some alleged mental disorder and, adding the alleged ADHD to the psychiatric assault on women, makes it a perfect diagnosing storm. The nation is already dealing with tens of millions of women on cocktails of mind-altering drugs. Is it necessary to add the alleged ADHD drug “treatment” to the cocktail?
Presumably so. One woman interviewed for the New York Post article reported “there is no shame in needing help to feel like the best version of yourself.” Perhaps. But Lindsay Clancy wanted to be the best version of herself for her kids and sought psychiatric help. Five psychiatric diagnoses and 32 prescriptions of 13 mind-altering drugs later, would anyone seriously agree that Clancy was “helped” to be the “best version” of herself by the cocktails of psychiatric drugs prescribed?
What you can do. Sign the Petition calling for federal hearings!
Donate! Every dollar you give is a powerful statement, a resounding declaration that the struggles of these families will no longer be ignored. Your generosity today will echo through generations, ensuring that the rights and well-being of children are fiercely guarded. Don’t let another family navigate this journey alone. Donate now and join us in creating a world where every child’s mind is nurtured, respected, and given the opportunity to thrive. As a 501(c)3 organization, your donation to AbleChild is not only an investment in the well-being of vulnerable children but also a tax-deductible contribution to a cause that transcends individual lives
LMAO! Scott Bessent is absolutely CLOWNING ON Canada after their “threats” against us
Mike Davis 
Freeview 236, Sky 512, Virgin 604
GB News on YouTube: 
Major developments re: Donald Trump’s designs on Greenland:
