While Ireland Deteriorates with Unchecked Migration, Government Lectures Grandparents on Hugging Their Grandchildren ‘Without Consent’

Dublin, Ireland Anti-Mass Migration Protest via Twitter

Like many countries in Europe, the very essence of Irish culture is being destroyed from within as Ireland grapples with the violent consequences of a torrent of migrants flowing into the country without any apparent limit and the financial and social implications that follow.

Reports suggest there are at least 322 plantations spread across the country, some in rural parts of the island nation, which are changing the very fabric of the nation.

In 2025, MMA Champion Conor McGregor visited the White House for St. Patrick’s Day and delivered a devastating message about what is happening in his homeland thanks to Ireland’s globalist leaders.

A Sudanese was charged over a medieval, barbaric knife attack in north Belfast that left a man with horrific injuries.

The Gateway Pundit reported on the stabbing of five people, including children, in 2023 in Dublin by an Algerian migrant.

Protests have erupted across the country, including in Ballinrobe, Co Mayo, over plans to bring 50 male migrants to the small town.

The International Protection Accommodation Service reported roughly 33,250 people in its accommodation system at the end of 2025, a 450 percent increase since 2021.

Yet what does the Irish government choose to focus on?

Grandparents hugging their grandchildren ‘without consent’.

In a video put out by the Irish government, the narrator notes, “Not everyone wants a hug,” as two grandparents lean in to love on their granddaughter, “Even from the people who love them.”

“Awkward? Maybe. Important? Absolutely.”

“We-consent is here to help.”

Watch:

 

The post While Ireland Deteriorates with Unchecked Migration, Government Lectures Grandparents on Hugging Their Grandchildren ‘Without Consent’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Apple’s $2,000 Flex: What’s Really Inside?

Apple’s first foldable iPhone was engineered and launched as a top-tier luxury device, and the company built the buying experience to match: high price, carefully staged availability, and a retail rollout designed to put the product in customers’ hands with theater and control rather than chaos.

At a Glance

  • Apple introduced iPhone Duo, its first foldable iPhone, as a flagship-class device.
  • Pricing starts around $2,000, positioning Duo at the apex of the iPhone line.
  • Preorders opened a week ahead of the in-store debut, channeling early demand online.
  • Apple’s global retail launch emphasized demonstrations and assisted shopping in stores.

What Apple Launched: A Foldable iPhone Positioned as Luxury

Apple formally unveiled iPhone Duo as its inaugural foldable iPhone, making a clear statement about where foldables belong in the iPhone hierarchy: at the very top. The announcement placed Duo as a showcase for Apple’s foldable engineering and software, not as a mass-market experiment. That strategic framing matters. It tells you who it’s built for—early adopters comfortable paying for novelty and refinement—and how Apple intends to pace production, marketing, and channel allocation in the first cycle of an entirely new form factor.

The price seals that message. Duo starts at roughly $2,000, with mainstream business and consumer reporting pegging the entry configuration at $1,999 and running materially higher at the top end. That pricing pushes Duo beyond “premium smartphone” into luxury electronics territory, where exclusivity, craftsmanship, and first-adopter status are part of the product proposition as much as the spec sheet.

How Apple Structured Demand: Preorders, Then Theatrical Retail

Apple opened preorders one week before physical retail availability, a cadence it has used repeatedly to meter early demand and tune store-day operations. Preorders went live October 16 at 5 a.m. Pacific on Apple’s website and in the Apple Store app; in-store sales followed on October 23. That gap does more than build anticipation—it shifts the heaviest surge of demand into a controlled digital queue, sets delivery expectations early, and gives Apple retail the ability to plan demonstrations and assisted purchases without fielding an undifferentiated crush of walk-ins.

On retail launch day, Apple’s own account emphasized that Duo “made its debut at Apple Store locations worldwide,” with customers filling stores while team members provided demonstrations and shopping support. This is classic Apple choreography: prime the channel with preorders, then stage an in-person experience where staff can educate, up-sell, and make the device feel scarce but attainable. The company’s public materials highlighted availability across apple.com, the Apple Store app, and physical stores—language shaped to communicate access while keeping flexibility around mix and timing in each channel.

Scarcity, Exclusivity, and the First-Run Playbook

With a new form factor, the question consumers invariably ask—“Will I get one on launch day?”—has less to do with a binary of “shortage” versus “plenty” and more to do with placement along a familiar spectrum: high demand, conservative early production, and deliberate allocation converge to produce the perception of rarity. Historically, Apple launches have generated queues, constrained configurations, or elongated ship times, and analysts habitually disagree about the relative weight of demand versus supply. That ambiguity isn’t new; it’s the baseline whenever Apple debuts a device with new manufacturing steps or novel components.

The Duo’s price intensifies that dynamic. At $2,000 and up, the product competes with luxury electronics and boutique laptops more than mainstream phones. In luxury markets, scarcity signals status and reduces price sensitivity among target buyers. It also changes how to interpret lines outside a store or a sold-out color on day one: in many cases, that is the intended customer experience—evidence that you are buying into something leading-edge, not merely an appliance with a SKU.

Mechanics Behind a Foldable First Generation

First-generation foldables concentrate complexity in three places: the display stack, hinge assembly, and software choreography across states (folded, partially open, fully open). Apple’s industrial design favors tight tolerances, longevity targets measured in years, and a “disappearing act” approach to the seam or crease; those priorities ripple back through the supply chain. Early runs of any such device will be gated by yield on specialized parts, new assembly sequences, and the need to validate durability envelopes at scale. Apple’s preorder-first cadence allows the company to align these manufacturing realities with the customer-facing story—early adopters can signal demand, while Apple tunes mix and throughput before the retail show begins.

On the software side, Apple typically treats a new form factor as a platform event. The operating system must fluidly adapt UI and windowing across modes, keep application state persistent through transitions, and deliver that “of course it works this way” feeling that hides the underlying complexity. That integration work often lands just-in-time with hardware availability; staging the debut via preorders and a guided retail launch gives Apple room to ship day-one updates and coach customers in-store on how to extract value from new interaction patterns.

Where the Real Consumer Decisions Live

For prospective buyers, the practical question isn’t whether Duo is “available” in the abstract; it’s how to navigate channels and timing. Apple’s own materials specify two clear paths: preorder online during the advance window, or engage with the retail experience on launch day and beyond. Each path has trade-offs. Preordering maximizes the odds of securing a preferred configuration and an early delivery date, while retail provides hands-on evaluation—vital for a device whose hinge feel, crease visibility, and two-state ergonomics will make or break long-term satisfaction.

Price and storage choices also shape outcomes. At luxury price points, buyers often skew toward higher storage tiers and premium finishes, compressing availability in those SKUs first. That behavior can ripple into perceived scarcity—one configuration sells out while another remains bookable—and it mirrors patterns seen in earlier iPhone cycles when specific color/storage combinations were harder to secure even as other variants remained orderable.

What This Signals About Apple’s Strategy

Duo’s launch signals two strategic through-lines. First, Apple believes foldables have matured enough—material science, hinge reliability, panel lifespan, and software coherence—to warrant an iPhone-class treatment, not a side project. Second, the company intends to shape demand through premium positioning rather than chase volume out of the gate. By pricing Duo at the top of the range, front-loading preorders, and centering the retail debut on guided experiences, Apple preserves optionality: it can dial production as yields improve, expand color or storage mixes as the supply base stabilizes, and roll learnings into subsequent revisions without flooding channels.

For consumers, the takeaway is straightforward. If Duo fits your budget and you want it early, align with Apple’s cadence: preorder windows for speed, store visits for certainty and fit. If price or timing is flexible, second-wave inventory typically smooths out as production ramps and configuration pressure eases. Foldables reward patience—both for the manufacturing system and for buyers deciding how a new form factor fits daily life. With iPhone Duo, Apple has designed the product and the buying journey to meet at that intersection of desire, access, and showmanship—and, by intent, not everyone will arrive there on the same day.

Sources:

apple.com, biz.heraldcorp.com

Lula Wins in Brazil, but Bolsonaro Refuses to Concede

Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva won a historic fourth term on Sunday in a polarized runoff election against the right-wing candidate Flavio Bolsonaro. Lula won 51.8 percent of the vote with all the votes counted, according to results announced by Brazil’s electoral court.

Bolsonaro refused to concede and asked for the election to be annulled, pointing to a last-minute decision from a Supreme Court justice to extend voting for two hours. He observed that the justice, Cristiano Zanin, is Lula’s former lawyer, but both candidates had requested extensions.

The results defied preelection polls and marked a setback for the rising Latin American right.

Bolsonaro is the son of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, whom Lula defeated in 2022. The elder Bolsonaro was sentenced to prison for plotting a coup to remain in power.

The post Lula Wins in Brazil, but Bolsonaro Refuses to Concede appeared first on The American Conservative.

Ukraine Field Report: Russian Drone Kills Three in Synelnykove as Ukraine Hits Missile Parts Plant in Oryol

Fire in a five-story residential building in Hlukhiv, Sumy Oblast, after Russian strikes on October 24, 2026. Photo courtesy of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine/DSNS of Sumy Oblast.

Russian drones, missiles and guided bombs struck cities across Ukraine between October 23 and 24, killing civilians in five oblasts. Regional reports compiled by the Kyiv Independent put the toll through the morning of October 24 at four killed and 78 injured. Overnight into October 24, Russia launched 126 drones, 61 of them jet-powered, and air defenses downed or suppressed 101.

On the morning of October 24, a drone destroyed a one-story private house in Kyiv’s Obolon district and started a fire, injuring two people, one of whom was hospitalized. Ballistic missiles struck the capital two days earlier.

In the north, a Russian strike on an enterprise in Chernihiv on October 23 killed a man and injured 18 people, seven of whom were hospitalized, regional head Viacheslav Chaus said. On October 24, drones hit a warehouse in the city, injuring two women, and Gerbera drones damaged administrative buildings in Novhorod-Siverskyi.

Over the 24 hours to the morning of October 24, Russian forces carried out more than 40 attacks on 25 settlements in 16 communities of Sumy Oblast, injuring seven people in the Hlukhiv community. On October 24, a drone struck a cattle farm in the Buryn community, killing a 31-year-old worker. A drone also hit a five-story apartment building in Hlukhiv, setting an apartment and the roof on fire, and rescuers saved three people.

Russia struck energy infrastructure and a civilian enterprise in the Zhytomyr community, with no casualties. Drones set fires across western Ukraine earlier this month.

In the east, Russian forces attacked Kharkiv and 15 settlements in the region with missiles, guided bombs and drones, regional head Oleh Syniehubov said. A 12-year-old girl was wounded and two men were wounded in Cherkaski Tyshky, while four people, including a 13-year-old boy, suffered acute stress reactions.

Strikes damaged two enterprises, an apartment building, four private houses, seven cars, a circus building, an office, a gas station and a garage. On October 24, a missile strike on warehouses in Lozova killed a 45-year-old man and injured two others, and Russian forces twice hit a shopping center in the city’s Osnovianskyi district.

In Donetsk Oblast, regional head Vadym Filashkin reported that attacks killed one person and injured 14 in Kramatorsk, where 27 apartment buildings, three administrative buildings and an enterprise were damaged. Police said three children were among the wounded. In Sloviansk, one person was killed, four were injured, and three apartment buildings, two private houses, two shops, a gas station and six cars were damaged. Aerial bombs also fell on Sloviansk last week.

Russian forces attacked four districts of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast nearly 70 times on October 23, killing one person in Dnipro and injuring 11, regional head Oleksandr Hanzha said. On October 24, a drone hit an apartment building in Synelnykove, killing three people and injuring 14, including an 11-year-old girl. In the Nikopol district, attacks killed two women and injured five, including a 14-year-old boy.

In the south, Russian forces attacked Kherson and 35 settlements in the region, injuring six people and damaging an apartment building, a private house and cars, regional head Oleksandr Prokudin said. In Odesa Oblast, Governor Oleh Kiper said strikes on October 23 damaged civilian, recreational and industrial facilities, injuring three people. In Zaporizhzhia, a daytime strike on October 24 hit an infrastructure facility, injuring two people.

Ukraine’s General Staff reported Russian losses of 1,980 personnel on October 23, bringing the total to about 1,576,600. Ukraine does not publish its own losses.

The General Staff also confirmed hitting the main production building of Proton-Electrotex in Oryol between October 23 and 24, saying the strike hampers production of cruise and ballistic missile components. It also reported strikes on the Tolyattikauchuk complex in Tolyatti and an aircraft at Yeysk airfield.

Ukrainian human rights commissioner Dmytro Lubinets said, on October 24, that Ukraine and Russia agreed on a ceasefire for a humanitarian mission in occupied Oleshky, beginning October 27 at 3:00 a.m. Kyiv time.

On October 23, Rep. Gregory Meeks and Sen. Peter Welch led four other Democratic lawmakers in a letter demanding that Elon Musk explain why Ukrainian forces lost access on October 13 to Starshield, the military version of Starlink. They cited reports that Musk personally ordered a speed cap, despite his statement that limits are decided by the U.S. military and the president. The lawmakers gave Musk until October 31 to respond. On October 22, President Donald Trump said Musk had already lifted the limits.

Bloomberg reported on October 23 that Germany is negotiating to buy thousands of deep-strike weapons from several European manufacturers as deliveries of U.S. Tomahawk missiles are delayed. The talks include a contract worth more than €1 billion ($1.12 billion) with U.S. startup Covenant for its Anthem ground-launched cruise missile, as well as co-production and purchase of Ukrainian Bars missiles.

 

The post Ukraine Field Report: Russian Drone Kills Three in Synelnykove as Ukraine Hits Missile Parts Plant in Oryol appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Write-In Stuff

The Write-In Stuff

Must all change always be for the worst?

Voting booths in polling place
(DigitalVision/Getty Images)

I was an election junkie at an early age. I stayed up late into the night of November 5, 1968, pulling for that old windbag Hubert Humphrey. (I’m told that I cried upon waking to his defeat the next morning, though maybe I just didn’t want to go to school.) I began collecting campaign buttons and political ephemera in 1972—anyone wanna buy a bag of 100 “Nixon Now” pinbacks?—and however deep my adult anarchist streak runs I have always enjoyed the act of voting: walking to the polling place, joking with the election ladies, and pulling the lever for friends or no-hope longshots.

Ah, but those days are gone. The lever machines were junked as a result of the second President Bush’s tech-soiled Help America Vote Act, and the longshots were wiped out by the Aqualung-ish second Governor Cuomo’s election “reforms,” which made it nearly impossible for third parties and independents to achieve ballot access in New York State. 

Must all change always be for the worst?

In classic “arsenic or cyanide, sir?” fashion, New Yorkers are given the Hobson’s choice between a Democratic Party that has lost any connection to rural and working-class Americans and a Republican Party that is running this year on the Iran War and building more data centers. Whoopee!

Ever Pollyanna, I tease out the silver lining in this assault on democracy by scribbling write-in votes, so on November 3, 2026, I’ll be doing just that. And y’know, it’s kinda fun.

In the governor’s race, Donald Trump’s non-support chased Rep. Elise Stefanik, who might have given incumbent Kathy Hochul a run for her donors’ money, out of the race, making way for the charisma-deficient Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman. On one of Mr. Blakeman’s earliest forays Upstate he toured our lovely green and hilly Southern Tier, the northern tip of Appalachia. Dumbfounded by its lack of resemblance to Long Island, he remarked disapprovingly on what he saw as the life-worn people and shabby towns and rusted old pickups, speculating that if only the hicks would embrace fracking they’d be happy as clams, their prosperous asses perched on the seats of spanking new pickup trucks. Stay on Long Island, Bruce.

My fervent friend Howard is writing in Jesus Christ for governor this year. “Sister” Jeanette Chin, street lady and holy fool of Manhattan, was beloved by Catholic Workers for her favorite saying: “I vote for Jesus because Jesus votes for everybody.” I agree wholeheartedly with the good sister, so I’ll go halfway and write in the Catholic Worker founder and saint-in-waiting Dorothy Day for chief executive of New York.

“Our” congresswoman, the Republican Claudia Tenney, represents a hideously gerrymandered district into which the Democrats shoved as many of Upstate’s disproportionately Republican voters as could fit. How embarrassing is she? In 2025 La Tenney introduced legislation to make Donald Trump’s birthday a national holiday. There is probably no degrading act she would not perform for Forever War Don, up to and including calling the humble Great Lake thirty miles to our north “Lake America.”

How, O Lord, did we fall so far and so fast? For the House I’ll write in my late friend and our ten-term congressman Barber Conable, a brilliant and witty and entirely honorable (he refused any individual campaign contribution of greater than $50, even in the Watergate-flooded year of 1974) decentralist rural Republican of a sort who existed in a better country.

My pal Chuck, our retired county judge, a man of probity and intellect and humor, surely is superior in every respect to Attorney General Letitia James, whose lack of commitment to protecting the liberties of New Yorkers would make a Stasi apparatchik blush. He’ll still spend summers on the golf course, but Chuck would make a fine part-time AG.

Few state governments are as profligate as New York’s, so for comptroller I’ll pencil in my late friend Jim, the cheapest man in Batavia, a guy who would call my dad crowing in triumph if he found a dime in the racetrack parking lot.

The only vote I’ll cast for someone whose name actually appears on the ballot will be for our state assemblyman, Steve Hawley, ebulliently mischievous Republican tribune of rural New York. Picking up the mantle formerly lofted by William Randolph Hearst, Bella Abzug, and Norman Mailer, Steve has proposed the division of New York into two or more states, an idea so sane, so logical, and so much less bureaucratic and inhuman than the status quo that it appalls the power-lusters. (The first Governor Cuomo called the division of New York “divisive”—well, yeah, I guess it is….)

A lot of air has gone out of the balloon since 1968. I don’t cry over election results anymore. Maybe I should.

The post The Write-In Stuff appeared first on The American Conservative.

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Myles Morell Speaks with Grieving Mother after 12-Year-Old Michigan Girl’s Suicide – Her Story Is Heart-Wrenching

 

Myles Moewll interviews a grieving Michigan mother who lost her daughter.

An organization called the MAHA Institute has been hosting events across the country to promote the ever-growing Make America Healthy Again movement. Their latest event in Washington, DC raised questions on the harmful affects of social media.

During the panel, Charay Gadd, a Mom from Michigan tearfully told a heartbreaking story about how her daughter, London Izabella-Ryén Gadd died at only twelve years old.

According to Gadd, her daughter died of a pill overdose after being prescribed SSRI and blamed what she called “failures” that range from medical professionals, social media, and mental health systems.

Wanting more answers to this tragic story, I sat down with Gadd in an exclusive interview:

“We later learned that social media was harming London and she was struggling, but at the time we were unaware of it. Medical professionals never brought it up as maybe a root cause of what had been going on,” Gadd told me.

Gadd then talked about social media platforms sending “self-harm and suicidal content” to her daughter whenever she would search up subjects like “alligator skin boots” or the “pookie lip trend”

“I was aware of the addictive portions of it, but not the evil I call it. it messed with her. It messed with her psyche. I mean we all know our children’s brains are still developing, and it was reshaping it.”

Gadd noted that her daughter came to her to express that something was wrong.

“As a mother, all I knew was to reach out to medical professionals and so we were led to an inpatient facility in Michigan, and I entrusted because that was pretty much the only source that I thought at the time that I had.”

After admitting her daughter, medical professionals were in touch with Gadd less than twelve hours later, recommending the use of Prozac.

Initially hesitant, the psychiatrist that Gadd was in touch with eventually convinced her to put her daughter on the medication, telling her “It’s the safest drug out there,” with the psychiatrist even insisting that they would put their own child on it.

Gadd then told me that her daughter used the same medication eight months prior on five milligrams and expressed that she “didn’t like how she felt on it.” The psychiatrist insisted that Gadd “didn’t give it long enough,” and even put in the medical records that Gadd herself said that she didn’t give it long enough.

Gadd agreed to go through with having her daughter take ten milligrams of Prozac, but three days later she found out that it was increased to twenty milligrams without her approval and that she “found her name on verbal consent that she had never seen.”

By the time Gadd found out about this, the damage was done and it was too late.

“If the social media hadn’t played a part in this, she would have never been prescribed this medication,” Gadd told me.

The grieving mother is now dedicating her time and energy to prevent this situation from happening to other families:

“I wanna give people and families resources that I never had. I wanna give them the education on these medications to make their own informed consent decisions.”

Gadd is also lobbying for a bill in Michigan dubbed “London’s Law.” The bill is named after her daughter and would allow greater access for parents to view their children’s algorithm history on social media. She also called for pharmacogenomic testing to ensure certain medicines are compatible with the gene variants in children and wants to raise funding so lower income families can afford these tests.

America is undergoing a mental health crisis and social media has played a huge role  in this. Given the vulnerabilities of a developing child’s mind, Gabb supports banning social media for users that are 16 and under.

“If children were just sent inspirational content and these platforms were accountable that they had to, you know, follow these laws, instead of basically being able do whatever they please and send the content without any kind of filtering.”

Gadd ends the conversation by demanding accountability from the medical professionals:

“If I say ‘Okay, well, I have Prozac. The doctor just prescribed you 10 milligrams of Prozac. Why don’t you wanna take mine?’ I would be prosecuted because the medication might potentially harm you. You know? I just don’t understand where the accountability is.”

The tragic loss of Gadd’s daughter can lead to intense debates on the negative effects social media media can have on the youth and if further restrictions should be implemented to protect children’s developing minds.

With London’s Law and Gadd’s desire to turn the non-profit initiative Unscripted Minds into a full non-profit, the debate surrounding children’s usage of social media continues.

The post EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Myles Morell Speaks with Grieving Mother after 12-Year-Old Michigan Girl’s Suicide – Her Story Is Heart-Wrenching appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

At Least One Dem Group Understands the Party’s Failings

At Least One Dem Group Understands the Party’s Failings

The Rural Urban Bridge Initiative is giving good advice to blue politicians.

Cedar Falls, Iowa

Republicans should start worrying—and not just about a difficult midterm election season. A small Democratic organization may have figured out the reason for the party’s failures among rural, post-industrial, and non-college educated voters (shorthand here: the Midwest) and devised a way to win them back.

In Ohio, I saw the Democrats’ failures happen in real time: their abandonment of the Midwest. Factories and mills closed down, and family farms were consumed by mega-agricultural concerns. The people who had made their livings in those ways were simply left behind, like the now-rusted machinery strewn across the landscape. Generations of solidly Democratic voters were bewildered. They had done the right thing. They had voted Democrat. Now, who in government even knew they existed?

Not Hillary. On September 9, 2016, Clinton explained Donald Trump’s political appeal. She divided his supporters into two groups. One group felt the government and the economy had failed them. The other, she said, constituted a “basket of deplorables”—racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, and Islamophobic, everything her coastal supporters and media champions were not. She added that some were “irredeemable,” leaving open the question of how they might fare under another Clinton administration (Midwesterners remembered what NAFTA—a legacy of her husband’s presidency—did to the region). Hillary argued Trump gave legitimacy to dangerous people and ideas. That was bad, but it was the succinctness of the term “deplorables” that for practical purposes ended Clinton’s campaign that afternoon. She and her supporters did not just hate Trump’s politics, they deplored his voters as people. Clinton changed politics by transforming a political disagreement into a judgment about the character of millions of Americans.

Democrats did not suddenly abandon the Midwest. They gradually lost their cultural and political connection to large portions of it (recall Barack Obama’s 2008 remark that economically frustrated voters there “cling” to guns and religion). The Dems deprioritized most of the heartland, confident in their ability to win elections with just the coasts and some blue patches inland. It did not work.

Vitriol toward Trump voters is the default attitude among the “resistance” and many progressive politicians today. Hypocritically, Democrats never held Obama to the torch for his murder of hundreds of civilians by drone, yet those same Dems blame Republican voters personally for drug boats being blown up in the Caribbean. They wish ill on the Midwest not only because of who they voted for, but who they actually are as people. The term “MAGA” as a pejorative has been expanded to all Republican supporters and construed to mean opposition to democracy and even basic decency. I should know. It is a helluva thing to be shunned at Thanksgiving by my own liberal relatives.

But now, a political organization is seeing clearly how wrong the Democrats played all this—and wants to fix the problem. A newsletter from the group declares: “holding individual voters accountable for the egregious things Trump has done might feel like an act of justice, but it’s a strategic pitfall.”

The Rural Urban Bridge Initiative (RUBI) is a Democratic organization which seeks nothing less than to transform the default position of most progressives. They know that personal animosity toward Trump supporters repels voters who might otherwise switch sides for a new-style Democrat, a no-nonsense heartland state governor perhaps. They see the hatred of the person, not the idea, as a failed moral posture, one that threatens our core rights of speech and debate. Albeit for selfish reasons (to get more Democratic votes), they abhor the banning of controversial speakers on campus, the one-sidedness of modern media, and the nasty glee over the assassination attempts on the president. Never mind the actual killing of people like Charlie Kirk.

The founders and principals of RUBI are media unknowns, albeit with biographies that span from old-school Democrat to near-libertarian. Many are (or were) farmers. They are trying to produce handbooks and talking points to guide blue politicians looking to gain ground in red and purple districts. Their goal is not to turn the Midwest all blue again, but to turn the tide in elections where victory and defeat are separated by only a few percentage points.

One of their products is the 2026 Rural and Factory Town Candidate Toolkit. The guide reminds Dems of some rough math. “Criticizing the opposition,” it says,

[BLOCK]is insufficient when only 39 percent of the electorate has a favorable view of Democrats. In most rural and factory-town districts, working-class voters are the majority…. It’s not possible to win without regaining working-class support and, as of July, only 31 percent of high school grads and 42 percent of voters with some college said they planned to vote for Democrats in the midterms.[/BLOCK]

What to do? There’s a lot of general helpful information in the Toolkit, but a key point is this:

[BLOCK]Focus on what’s important to voters in your district. Talk like a neighbor, not like a politician or activist. Talk less about Trump/GOP/saving democracy and more about what you will do… Voters need a reason to vote for you. Democrats cannot win simply by getting more votes in cities and suburbs. Somebody has to build a bridge.[/BLOCK]

That last one captures the group’s overall political strategy.

Much of the guidance from RUBI is not new, albeit worthy of reiteration: Talk about local issues. Meet people where they live. Build trust. Hold community events, like park cleanups, at which Democrats and Republicans can work together. Don’t hold voters personally responsible for things politicians do. Respect free speech and viewpoint diversity.

RUBI cites a poll of factory town voters which found that 59 percent perceived Democrats as being “obsessed with LGBT issues instead of focusing on kitchen table economic issues.” RUBI urges candidates to avoid bolstering that impression.  It seems like common sense until you look at the likely 2028 presidential candidates, like Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Pete Buttigieg, AOC, all of whom often seem to have not gotten the memo.

So, will it work? Park clean-up projects can make pot-luck friends of political adversaries, but relationships do not automatically translate into votes. No amount of improved messaging, however sincere and clever, can entirely eliminate the genuine disagreements that divide us over guns, abortion, immigration, climate change, and traditional values.

There is also the problem of scale. Creating a new form of political organization in thousands of rural communities requires money, buy-in from compelling candidates, volunteers, and sustained effort. It is much easier to spend millions on anti-ICE advertising in mostly-blue agreeable suburbs than to build relationships in small towns. There is clearly not enough time left before the 2026 midterms to do that, nor even before 2028 if you consider the heavy lift of winning back lost votes in the Midwest. It just may not be possible to build those bridges.

Many national-level Democrats have lost the ability to talk to people they once knew how to represent. But for conservatives, it’s worthwhile to keep an eye on RUBI as, nearly alone among liberal groups, it has the right idea.

The post At Least One Dem Group Understands the Party’s Failings appeared first on The American Conservative.

Biden’s Israel Catastrophe

Biden’s Israel Catastrophe

A veteran journalist reveals how a Democratic White House enabled Israeli atrocities in Gaza.

TOPSHOT-ISRAEL-US-DIPLOMACY-POLITICS
U.S. President Joe Biden poses for a picture with Israeli President Isaac Herzog on July 14, 2022. Both sides vowed to deepen the Jewish state’s integration in the region as they face their common foe Iran. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

Crossing the Red Line: Biden, His Advisors, and Israel’s War in Gaza, by Akbar Shahid Ahmed. W.W. Norton & Company, 368 pages

When confronted with warnings that famine was spreading across northern Gaza in early 2024, members of President Joe Biden’s foreign policy team could not believe what they were being told. The alarming reports came from U.S. agencies and respected international humanitarian groups, but they starkly contradicted Israel’s version of events. 

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and Middle East coordinator Brett McGurk doubted Palestinians were going hungry amid mountains of rubble and corpses because the “people in photographs from Gaza did not look skinny,” reports the investigative journalist Akbar Shahid Ahmed, based on accounts from his anonymous sources.

Not only were staggering numbers of Palestinians desperate for food. They lacked clean drinking water, medicine, and shelter. They were being torn to pieces—in many cases by U.S.-manufactured bombs—as the Israeli military  kept up its relentless offensive. Yet the president and his top aides failed to meaningfully exert their influence to alleviate the suffering. Instead, their response was shaped by credulous deference to the Netanyahu government and disregard for both U.S. and international law.

“Biden’s stubbornness was one of his trademarks; Sullivan and others closest to him began to behave similarly, such as questioning the Palestinian casualty counts, even as they received more and more information from intelligence and humanitarian officials that showed how their policy had failed to ensure that aid reached Gazans,” writes Ahmed in Crossing the Red Line, his must-read reportage on the Biden administration’s refusal to restrain Israel from perpetrating what a growing consensus of scholars, jurists, human rights groups, and an independent U.N. commission now consider a genocide.

A diplomatic correspondent at The Washington Sun, Ahmed made his name during twelve years working at HuffPost, where he won awards for his Mideast coverage. The book draws on this prior work, augmented by interviews with dozens of former officials and a careful review of the documentary evidence.

The result is a meticulously reported, damning portrayal of a president and his tiny clique of decision-makers who, despite their pledge to uphold the “rules-based order,” found themselves enabling Israel to wage war against a civilian population and destabilize the region. Future historians will rely on Ahmed’s account, which reveals how highly credentialed, intelligent officials can close their eyes to what’s in front of them and make policy for an alternative reality.

Among Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s staff, for example, a culture of what one official called “herd impunity” enabled the near-automatic approval of weapons transfers as veteran diplomats discouraged internal dissent. Ahmed reports that Blinken never asked the intelligence community to assess whether Israel was committing war crimes, and officials repeatedly slowed down or subverted internal inquiries. The resulting lack of information allowed the administration to claim, quite conveniently, that it lacked sufficient evidence to cut Israel off from U.S. weapons.

Ahmed’s rendering of Biden’s team evokes nothing so much as President Lyndon Johnson and the “best and the brightest” who sank the United States ever deeper into the Vietnam War. Yet Biden faced an easier task than withdrawing hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops from an unwinnable war. The tools he needed were right in front of him. But time and again he refused to withhold weapons from Israel despite convincing evidence the IDF was indiscriminately leveling entire neighborhoods—even targeting schools, hospitals, and aid stations—in illegal acts of collective punishment. Moreover, Biden provided diplomatic cover for Israel at the UN, shielding Netanyahu from international consequences.

Why did the Biden administration choose this course? Ahmed does not depict U.S. decision-makers as bloodthirsty monsters; rather, one gets the impression they simply wanted to ignore what was happening. Unlike their Israeli counterparts, who publicly declared their intention to render Gaza unlivable, top White House officials displayed callousness, ignorance, myopia, or the all-too-human instinct to blame others rather than oneself. As a consequence, they gaslit the country while licensing ever more Israeli violence. 

Widening the historical lens, Ahmed underscores the importance of U.S. support for Israel and the casual dehumanization of Palestinians going back decades. Thus, after the October 7 horrors inflicted by Hamas, a president was ready to give Israel carte blanche.

Biden’s Gaza policy also flowed from the disastrous experience of the Global War on Terror and “a refusal among policy elites to reckon with its flaws,” says Ahmed, which fostered “comfort with jaw-dropping atrocities and dehumanizing of people in the region.” “Within America’s system of checks and balances,” he writes, this “limited scrutiny of presidents and their aides, reversing progress toward transparency… while holding few liable for abuses or crimes committed in the name of U.S. national security.” 

Biden’s approach was myopic, of course. He believed Netanyahu would repay his goodwill with restraint if asked. Instead, the Israeli prime minister bullied and humiliated him whenever a glint of daylight appeared between their governments. Beyond some tough talk, Biden rarely used the United States’ considerable leverage to curb his partner’s excesses.

The exceptions proved the rule. It was easy to ignore the killings of hundreds of nameless, faceless Palestinian aid workers — or simply blame Hamas for every IDF misstep. But on April 1, 2024, Israeli drones incinerated an aid convoy belonging to the celebrity chef Jose Andres’ World Central Kitchen. Seven people, including a U.S.-Canadian citizen, were killed. This could not be ignored. The next day, “USAID experts privately made their most serious assessment yet of Palestinian suffering… famine was likely occurring in Gaza, the humanitarian analysts wrote in a message sent to the White House and U.S. diplomats globally,” Ahmed tells us. “The rapid spread of hunger was ‘unprecedented in modern history.’”

On April 4, Biden called Netanyahu and demanded Israel let more aid into Gaza. For the first time in six months of war, the administration strictly adhered to the international standard that food, water, and medicine must be provided to civilians. Ahmed notes that the president’s newly stiffened spine encouraged “his aides to be more proactive about advice from experts they had discounted for months” out of fear of annoying the president and the Israelis. It worked: Israel opened new routes for supplies to enter Gaza, and as the mere talk of “either Biden or Congress restricting weapons continued… more changes in Israel’s behavior followed.” More trucks were suddenly allowed into Gaza, undermining past claims that aid wasn’t being deliberately restricted.

But such episodes of moral courage were rare. Cowardice usually ruled the day; and indeed, the administration failed its next major test. After drawing a red line against an Israeli invasion of Rafah in southern Gaza, the Biden administration undercut its credibility and botched a pause on shipments of some 2,000-lb. bombs. Says Ahmed:

They retreated to their pattern of sending more U.S. weapons to Israel as it committed apparent war crimes, and claiming Netanyahu would accept an American-brokered ceasefire — though his defiance of Biden and disregard for Palestinian survival were at their peak.

For all their professed expertise and political skill, Biden and his circle failed to truly grasp that the Israeli political establishment had no interest in a peace deal that might somehow lead to a Palestinian state. “Focusing on Netanyahu as the source of Israeli obstinacy misread his country’s politics and the effect of decades-old norms in U.S.-Israeli relations,” Ahmed writes.

Netanyahu and the fanatics in his coalition were bent on conquest and ethnic cleansing—and not in Gaza alone. They eventually expanded their war to southern Lebanon, while also giving free rein to rampaging settlers in the West Bank. Herein lies another disastrous Biden legacy. His failure to restrain Israel in 2023-24 dramatically accelerated the regional instability the increasingly enfeebled president said he and he alone was qualified to prevent. Put another way, Biden’s “ghastly and self-defeating Gaza policy” paved the road to Trump’s war, on behalf of Israel, against Iran. 

There’s another galling continuity to consider here, too: the lack of accountability. When it comes to foreign policy, being colossally wrong rarely threatens one’s career. McGurk now opines about national security on CNN. Blinken and Sullivan hold positions at prestigious universities. But thanks to Akbar Shahid Ahmed, their failures will not remain hidden from history. What’s left to be uncovered are the bodies of thousands of Palestinians, buried under Gaza’s rubble, whom they did so little to protect.

The post Biden’s Israel Catastrophe appeared first on The American Conservative.

George Soros’s Spawn Congratulates Commie Lula da Silva in Surprise Victory Over Pro-America Flavio Bolsonaro

Screenshot: Alex Soros/Instagram

Alex Soros, spawn of wicked billionaire George Soros, congratulated commie Lula da Silva on Sunday following his controversial presidential election win.

Soros: Lula Lula Lula! Congrats to Brazil for standing up against authoritarianism once again!

Alex is as despicable as his father. They want Brazil tied to communist China and led into the abyss by a ruthless socialist leader.

Lula’s personal attorney, who sits on the Supreme Court, kept precincts open for extra hours to benefit Lula.

To be fair, conservative Flavio Bolsonaro would have a difficult time winning in a country that only uses electronic voting machines… And, no paper trail.  A despot’s dream.

God bless Brazil tonight and always.

And, never forget…
The Biden State Department funded censorship ecosystem in Brazil to subvert the Bolsonaro administration.

In January 2023, as The Gateway Pundit reported that the Biden regime began deported Brazilian opposition leaders back to Brazil following the surprise election victory by socialist criminal Lula da Silva.

The Biden Regime sends former Brazilian Chief of Police Anderson Torres from Florida back to Brazil and the Lula gulags in January 2023.

In July 2024, Brazil’s Federal Police indicted popular former President Jair Bolsonaro for ‘money laundering and criminal association.’ The charges were reportedly related to ‘undeclared diamonds’ received from Saudi Arabia during his time in office.

This was nothing new. The Lula regime has been targeting and persecuting Bolsonaro and his supporters since the day they took office in 2023. Lula, the communist, was taking lessons from the Biden regime and their brazen and nonstop political persecution of President Donald Trump, parents, devout Catholics, pro-Life activists, and Trump supporters since taking office in 2021.

Brazil Protestor Commits Suicide in “Lulag” Concentration Camp, Death Toll Allegedly Reaches 4, Children Held in Prison

So it should come as no surprise that the Biden regime was openly supporting Lula da Silva, the socialist tyrant in Brazil, prior to the presidential elections. And now we know that the US State Department was funding the censorship ecosystem in Brazil with tens of millions of dollars.

Foreign Policy reported, prior to the 2022 Brazilian presidential elections, that Joe Biden and the CIA were working to ensure a Lula win in Brazil.

“How Team Biden Tried to Coup-Proof Brazil’s Elections,” read the headline.

According to reports, top Biden officials from the White House, Defense Department, State Department, and CIA all participated in threats against the Bolsonaro administration during rare, escalating diplomatic meetings.

Joe Biden’s CIA director, William Burns, and National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, both traveled to Brazil to meet with senior Brazilian officials and warn them that Bolsonaro should stop casting doubt on his country’s electoral process. It was the opening gambit in a quiet campaign by Washington to replace Bolsonaro, the popular people’s candidate, with the socialist tool Lula da Silva.

* * * * * * * * * *

In August 2024, the CEO of the popular messaging app Telegram was arrested at Le Bourget airport in France for refusing to comply with the country’s censorship laws. Pavel Durov, 39, was arrested on the tarmac as he got off his private jet from Azerbaijan.

Mike Benz, the founder and Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online later released a video explaining who he believes is behind this arrest – The US State Department.

Mike Benz was interviewed by Tucker Carlson. During their conversation, Benz discussed how the State Department spent tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to build the censorship ecosystem in Brazil.

The Biden regime and our Deep State superiors spent millions to replace the pro-freedom Bolsonaro administration with the communist Lula de-Silva.

Congress should immediately begin investigating the Biden regime for their nefarious foreign policy operations to replace pro-Americans populist leaders with communist tyrants.  And, Old Broken Joe and Kamala need to explain to the American people why this was necessary.

The post George Soros’s Spawn Congratulates Commie Lula da Silva in Surprise Victory Over Pro-America Flavio Bolsonaro appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

BREAKING: Flavio Bolsonaro Calls for Election to be “Annulled” – Extending Voting Hours Has NEVER Happened Before in Brazil’s History!

Flavio Bolsonaro calls for election results to be annulled in Brazil after last minute move by socialist Lula to keep the polls open late!

Conservative Flavio Bolsonaro called for Sunday’s presidential results to be annulled in Brazil.

This comes after socialist tyrant Lula da Silva callled his personal attorney and Brazilian Justice Christiano Zanin to hold the polls open for two extra hours. Lula arrested the former pro-American leader Jair Bolsonaro following the previous election and is still persecuting the man – like a typical communist.

Flavio Bolsonaro was predicted to win on EVERY single polling aggregator in the country.

Flavio Bolsonaro spoke out after the results were called. He called the results INVALID and stated Lula stole the election from him.

Flavio Bolsonaro: “What happened today was not something normal. In fact, it was something unacceptable. At 5:01 pm, Justice Zanin makes a decision extending the election hours by 2 hours. This has never happened before in the history of Brazil… A Supreme Court justice, for the first time in history—Lula’s former lawyer—issued a unilateral decree at the request of a former law partner of his, and changed the rules of the game in the middle of the game!… At 5:01 PM, Justice Zanin—who is not part of the Superior Electoral Court—trampling over the specialized electoral court, made a decision extending voting by two hours. This had never happened in the history of Brazil!”

The The president of Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court, Judge Kassio Nunes Marques, has just issued a devastating warning:
There was absolutely no rule that allowed extending the voting by two hours.

It was an unprecedented order from a Supreme Court magistrate allied with Lula, which ended up benefiting his regions.

He also warned that it was materially impossible, in just a few hours, to guarantee that a judicial decision of that magnitude would not cause side effects—especially technological ones—capable of significantly altering the vote count.

VISIONS OF 2020–

Here’s the back story…

Lula da Silva and his personal attorney and Supreme Court Justice Christiano Zanin and conservative Flavio Bolsonaro

The Brazilian Presidential Election is being held today in one of Latin America’s few remaining leftist controlled countries.

Socialist Lula da Silva is locked in a tight race with Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of former persecuted president Jair Bolsonaro.

Cuba-aligned socialist Lula da Silva is up against Flavio Bolsonaro in today’s runoff election in Brazil.

Earlier today, President Lula da Silva’s “personal attorney” and Supreme Court Justice Christiano Justin extended election hours after complaints by Lula!

They call Justice Cristiano Zanin “Lula’s justice” (or “ministro do Lula”) because he was Lula’s personal lawyer who successfully defended him in the Lava Jato cases, and Lula later appointed him to Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court (STF).

Unbelievable!

Ballot counting in Brazil’s 2026 presidential runoff (Lula vs. Flávio Bolsonaro) was set to begin at 17:00 Brasília time (5 p.m. local) on October 25, when polls were originally scheduled to close.⁠Oglobo.globo

Brazil uses a unified Brasília schedule for elections, electronic voting machines transmit results quickly, and the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) typically starts publishing partial totals right after closing.

A last-minute Supreme Court decision by Justice Cristiano Zanin extended voting by two hours (until 19:00 Brasília) over transport and weather issues.

The post BREAKING: Flavio Bolsonaro Calls for Election to be “Annulled” – Extending Voting Hours Has NEVER Happened Before in Brazil’s History! appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.